Networked Forces in Stability Operations 101st Airborne Division, 3/2 and 1/25 Stryker Brigades in Northern Iraq Daniel Gonzales, John Hollywood, Jerry M. Sollinger, James McFadden, John DeJarnette, Sarah Harting, Donald Temple Prepared for the Office of the Secretary of Defense Approved for public release; distribution unlimited NATIONAL DEFENSE RESEARCH INSTITUTE The research described in this report was prepared for the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD). The research was conducted in the RAND National Defense Research Institute, a federally funded research and development center sponsored by the OSD, the Joint Staff, the Unified Combatant Commands, the Department of the Navy, the Marine Corps, the defense agencies, and the defense Intelligence Community under Contract DASW01-01-C-0004. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Networked forces in stability operations : 101st Airborne Division, 3/2 and 1/25 Stryker brigades in northern Iraq / Daniel Gonzales ... [et al.]. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 978-0-8330-4303-0 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Command and control systems—United States—Evaluation—Case studies. 2. Communications, Military—Evaluation—Case studies. 3. Stryker brigade combat teams—Evaluation—Case studies. 4. United States. Army. Airborne Division, 101st—History—21st century. 5. United States—Armed Forces—Stability operations—Evaluation. 6. Iraq War, 2003–—Campaigns. I. Gonzales, Daniel, 1956– UA943.N48 2007 956.7044'342—dc22 2007041879 Public release of this report was granted by the Chief of the DoD Office of Security Review on 17 September 2007, per DD Form 1910. The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit research organization providing objective analysis and effective solutions that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors around the world. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. R ® is a registered trademark. © Copyright 2007 RAND Corporation All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from RAND. Published 2007 by the RAND Corporation 1776 Main Street, P.O. Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138 1200 South Hayes Street, Arlington, VA 22202-5050 4570 Fifth Avenue, Suite 600, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-2665 RAND URL: http://www.rand.org/ To order RAND documents or to obtain additional information, contact Distribution Services: Telephone: (310) 451-7002; Fax: (310) 451-6915; Email: [email protected] Preface This case study report examines the network-centric operations (NCO) capabilities and the operations of Stryker brigades and the 101st Airborne Division that conducted stability operations in Iraq in the 2003 to 2005 time frame. We investigate how the NCO capabilities and other resources available to these units were utilized to conduct stability and counterinsurgency operations and whether these capabilities resulted in improved mission effectiveness. The monograph should interest U.S. Army and joint task force designers, those concerned with the development of digital battle command and communications sys- tems, and those interested in the implications of NCO for the transformation of mili- tary forces. This research was sponsored by the Office of Force Transformation and con- ducted within the Acquisition and Technology Policy Center of the RAND National Defense Research Institute, a federally funded research and development center spon- sored by the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, the unified combatant commands, the Department of the Navy, the Marine Corps, the defense agencies, and the defense Intelligence Community. For more information on RAND’s Acquisition and Technology Policy Center, contact the director, Philip Antón. He can be reached by email, Philip_Anton@ rand.org; by phone at 310-393-0411, ext. 7798; or by mail at RAND, 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, California, 90407-2138. More information about RAND is available at www.rand.org. iii Contents Preface................................................................................................. iii Figures................................................................................................. ix Tables .................................................................................................. xi Summary.............................................................................................xiii Acknowledgments................................................................................ xxxv Abbreviations.................................................................................... xxxvii CHAPTER ONE Introduction........................................................................................... 1 Background............................................................................................. 1 Objectives............................................................................................... 3 Analytic Approach..................................................................................... 4 Sources of Information................................................................................ 9 Organization of Monograph.........................................................................10 CHAPTER TWO Iraqi Operational Setting and Unit Characteristics ..........................................13 Characteristics of Anti-Iraqi Forces ................................................................16 Phases of the Insurgency.............................................................................17 Unit Organization ....................................................................................18 Areas of Operation................................................................................... 20 AO Sizes, Personnel, Funding, and Attached Units............................................. 23 Timeline of Events .................................................................................. 28 U.S. Casualties ....................................................................................... 36 v vi Networked Forces in Stability Operations: 101st ABD, 3/2 and 1/25 SBCTs in Northern Iraq CHAPTER THREE Force Networking, Quality of Information, and Quality of Shared Situation Awareness ........................................................................................39 Networking Systems..................................................................................39 Effect of Networking Systems on Quality of Information...................................... 48 Specific Effects of Networking Systems on Quality of Information .......................... 54 Effect of Networking Systems on Quality of Collaboration.................................... 56 Quality of Shared Situation Awareness.............................................................58 CHAPTER FOUR Tactical Stability Missions, NCO-Enabled Processes, and Tactical Mission Effectiveness .....................................................................................65 Tactical Military Operations in Stability Operations.............................................65 NCO-Enabled Processes ........................................................................... 68 Speed and Agility of Command.....................................................................69 Responsive Maneuver.................................................................................72 Networking with Aerial Support and Surveillance Assets .......................................74 Robustness to Enemy Attack........................................................................75 Stability Operations Intelligence Needs............................................................91 CHAPTER FIVE Mission Effectiveness in Stability Operations..................................................95 U.S. Strategic Objectives and MNF–I Campaign Plan..........................................95 Assessment Framework ............................................................................. 98 Assessment of Effectiveness—Political Progress................................................. 101 Assessment of Effectiveness—Defeating Terrorists and Containing the Insurgency....... 108 Summary of Mission Effectiveness................................................................ 123 CHAPTER SIX Summary: Findings and Recommendations.................................................. 129 Assessment of 101st ABD Mission Effectiveness in Stability Operations.................... 129 Assessment of 3/2 SBCT Mission Effectiveness in Stability Operations..................... 133 Assessment of 1/25 SBCT Mission Effectiveness in Stability Operations.................... 136 Role of NCO Capabilities in Improving Force Effectiveness in Stability Operations ..... 139 Summary of Network and Intelligence Capabilities............................................ 142 Contents vii Additional Findings................................................................................. 144 Recommendations .................................................................................. 145 APPENDIX A. Director, Office of Force Transformation, Study Authorization Memorandum... 147 B. SBCT Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures Used in OIF.............................. 151 C. Detailed Results of the Quality of Information and Collaboration Surveys....... 161 D. Iraqi National Elections...................................................................... 165 Bibliography........................................................................................ 171 Figures S.1. Civilians Killed in All of Iraq and in Mosul .........................................xv S.2. U.S. Personnel Killed and Wounded in Action per Enemy Attack............... xvi S.3. U.S. Personnel Killed and Wounded in Action per Offensive Operation ....... xvi S.4. Key Factors Influencing 101st ABD Performance in Stability Operations .... xviii S.5. Key Factors Influencing 3/2 SBCT Performance in Stability Operations ..... xxii S.6. Key Factors Influencing 1/25 SBCT Performance in Stability Operations..... xxv S.7. Adaptation of Materiel and Nonmateriel NCO Force Elements.................xxix 1.1. NCO Conceptual Framework .......................................................... 6 1.2. NCO Analysis Approach ................................................................ 8 2.1. The “Sunni Triangle” and U.S. Unit Operating Areas..............................14 2.2. Locations of Frequent U.S. Military Casualties Between May 2003 and July 2005.......................................................................................15 2.3. 101st ABD, 3/2 SBCT, and 1/25 SBCT Organizational Structures...............19 2.4. 101st ABD and 3/2 SBCT Area of Operations ......................................21 2.5. The 1/25 SBCT Area of Operations.................................................. 22 2.6. Causes of Death for U.S. Troops ......................................................31 2.7. U.S. Military Casualties in OIF since March 19, 2003.............................37 3.1. 101st ABD Infantry Brigade Network............................................... 40 3.2. 3/2 SBCT Communications Network............................................... 42 3.3. IKSS Network........................................................................... 44 3.4. UAV Imagery Received by Rover III..................................................45 3.5. Predator Control Using Rover III and SIPRNET MIRC ......................... 46 3.6. C2/BC Systems ..........................................................................47 3.7. Quality of Information for Cordon-and-Search and Knock-and-Raid Missions...................................................................................52 3.8. Quality of Information for Convoy Missions........................................53 3.9. Survey Results on Quality of Collaboration..........................................57 ix
Description: