NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY – CURRENT APPLICATIONS IN CLINICAL PRACTICE Edited by Oliver F. Bathe Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy – Current Applications in Clinical Practice Edited by Oliver F. Bathe Published by InTech Janeza Trdine 9, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia Copyright © 2011 InTech All chapters are Open Access distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license, which allows users to download, copy and build upon published articles even for commercial purposes, as long as the author and publisher are properly credited, which ensures maximum dissemination and a wider impact of our publications. After this work has been published by InTech, authors have the right to republish it, in whole or part, in any publication of which they are the author, and to make other personal use of the work. Any republication, referencing or personal use of the work must explicitly identify the original source. As for readers, this license allows users to download, copy and build upon published chapters even for commercial purposes, as long as the author and publisher are properly credited, which ensures maximum dissemination and a wider impact of our publications. Notice Statements and opinions expressed in the chapters are these of the individual contributors and not necessarily those of the editors or publisher. No responsibility is accepted for the accuracy of information contained in the published chapters. The publisher assumes no responsibility for any damage or injury to persons or property arising out of the use of any materials, instructions, methods or ideas contained in the book. Publishing Process Manager Niksa Mandic Technical Editor Teodora Smiljanic Cover Designer InTech Design Team First published January, 2012 Printed in Croatia A free online edition of this book is available at www.intechopen.com Additional hard copies can be obtained from [email protected] Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy – Current Applications in Clinical Practice, Edited by Oliver F. Bathe p. cm. ISBN 978-953-307-994-3 Contents Preface IX Chapter 1 Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in Breast Cancer 1 Vladimir F. Semiglazov and Vladislav V. Semiglazov Chapter 2 Neoadjuvant Therapy in Breast Cancer 23 Angela Lewis Traylor, Nathalie Johnson and Esther Han Chapter 3 Surgical Intervention Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer 31 Michelle Sowden, Baiba Grube, Brigid Killilea and Donald Lannin Chapter 4 Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Extra-Pulmonary Neuroendocrine Carcinoma 41 Halfdan Sorbye Chapter 5 Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Gynecologic Cancers 59 Prapaporn Suprasert Chapter 6 Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Ovarian Cancer 73 Jasmeet Chadha Singh and Amy Tiersten Chapter 7 Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Cervical Cancer 81 Lua Eiriksson, Gennady Miroshnichenko and Allan Covens Chapter 8 Percutaneous Pelvic Perfusion with Extracorporeal Chemofiltration for Advanced Uterine Cervical Carcinoma 109 Takeshi Maruo, Satoru Motoyama, Shinya Hamana, Shigeki Yoshida, Masashi Deguchi, Mineo Yamasaki and Yanson Ku Chapter 9 Neoadjuvant Treatment for Oesophago-Gastric Cancer 123 John E. Anderson and Jo-Etienne Abela VI Contents Chapter 10 Developments in Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy in Rectal Cancer 135 Sofia Conde, Margarida Borrego and Anabela Sá Chapter 11 Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Colorectal Liver Metastases 157 Pamela C. Hebbard, Yarrow J. McConnell and Oliver F. Bathe Chapter 12 Chemotherapy in the Combined Modality Treatment of Penile Carcinoma 181 Jennifer Wang and Lance C. Pagliaro Chapter 13 Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Extremity or Trunk, Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors, and Retroperitoneal Sarcoma 193 Lloyd Mack and Walley Temple Chapter 14 Effects of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in High-Grade Non-Metastatic Osteosarcoma of Extremities 213 Milan Samardziski, Vesna Janevska, Beti Zafirova-Ivanovska, Violeta Vasilevska and Slavica Kraleva Chapter 15 Chemotherapy and Mechanisms of Resistance in Breast Cancer 235 Andre Lima de Oliveira, Roberto Euzebio dos Santos and Fabio Francisco Oliveira Rodrigues Preface It was not so long ago that the therapeutic mainstays for solid tumors consisted of surgery and radiation. The discovery that nitrogen mustard and antifolates (methotrexate) could be used to induce remissions in childhood leukemia (Farber & Diamond, 1948; Goodman, Wintrobe et al., 1946) heralded a new therapeutic approach. Since then, the most significant therapeutic advances in oncology have been related to the discovery of novel systemic agents. In the context of solid tumors, systemic chemotherapy has allowed the oncologist to address the systemic nature of cancer, which has frequently metastasized by the time it has manifested clinically. But with progress, new questions arise. As more agents become available, the most efficacious agents or combinations must be defined. Optimal treatment algorithms also involve minimizing toxicity and maximizing quality of life. And how should chemotherapy be administered in conjunction with surgery? It is known, based on animal studies and the “cell kill” hypothesis proposed by Skipper and co-workers, i.e. a given dose of chemotherapy kills a constant fraction of tumor cells (Skipper, Schabel & Wilcox, 1964; Wilcox, Griswold, Laster, Schabel & Skipper, 1965), that cytotoxic drugs are most effective when used for smaller tumors. Therefore, there is a strong rationale for administering chemotherapy on an adjuvant basis, after surgical removal of gross disease, for treatment of any remaining microscopic disease. Indeed, this strategy has been shown effective in clinical studies, through the pioneering efforts of such investigators as Emil Frei (for osteosarcoma), Bernard Fisher, Gianni Bonadonna and Umberto Veronesi (for breast cancer), as well as a number of cooperative groups for colorectal cancer (Bonadonna et al., 1976; Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group, 1984; Higgins, Amadeo, McElhinney, McCaughan, & Keehn, 1984; Jaffe, Frei, Traggis, & Bishop, 1974; Panettiere et al., 1988; Wolmark et al., 1988). As a result of early successes, the majority of clinical trials investigating the combination of surgery and systemic therapy have involved the adjuvant approach. The rationale for administration of chemotherapy prior to surgery – neoadjuvant chemotherapy – is very different. Indeed, there is little evidence so far that it improves survival over adjuvant chemotherapy. In general, neoadjuvant chemotherapy provides early treatment of systemic and micrometastatic disease. Many patients who have had X Preface surgery do not recover sufficiently to receive adjuvant chemotherapy; therefore, giving it before surgery ensures delivery of systemic therapy to a larger proportion of individuals. Administration of chemotherapy in the presence of gross, measurable disease provides information on the sensitivity of a given tumor to a particular chemotherapeutic regimen, perhaps guiding the choice of agents postoperatively (when disease is no longer visible). In some instances, downstaging may reduce disfigurement, dysfunction and morbidity associated with extensive resections, such as in rectal cancers, vulvar carcinomas and penile carcinomas. Downstaging with neoadjuvant chemotherapy may also convert an unresectable cancer to a resectable cancer, such as in colorectal liver metastases. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy may facilitate selection of candidates for surgery: it may be argued that individuals who have progression on chemotherapy or who cannot tolerate chemotherapy would not fare well with aggressive locoregional treatments. Finally, some systemic agents (most notably angiogenesis inhibitors) are not known to be effective in the adjuvant setting (Kemeny et al.; Van Cutsem, Lambrechts, Prenen, Jain, & Carmeliet). Therefore, administration prior to surgery may enhance delivery in conditions where they are effective. As with any treatment strategy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy also has some potential disadvantages. If progression occurs, a previously resectable tumor may become unresectable. Toxicities, including thromboembolic complications and lasting organ toxicity may increase the risk of subsequent surgery. To detractors, such outcomes would represent a disadvantage. Moreover, there is the problem of surgical planning following a complete response. Therefore, there is a need to seriously study the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in each specific instance, where different chemotherapeutic regimens are utilized for various types of cancer. In general, data supporting the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy are more plentiful for the more common tumors. For example, data related to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer, rectal cancer and metastatic colorectal cancer are accumulating rapidly, and the role of this treatment approach is slowly becoming elucidated. For less common tumors, very few data are available to support the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and research on this treatment approach is just beginning. In such instances, the experiences related to more common tumor types may inform trials on these more rare clinical entities. Interest in neoadjuvant chemotherapy also intensifies with the availability of more effective systemic agents. For example, in the case of extremity sarcoma, while neoadjuvant chemotherapy may reduce locoregional recurrence, the paucity of systemic agents with a high response rate may limit its utility for limb salvage, limiting its application outside of clinical trials. As systemic agents are developed that reliably shrink sarcomas, it can be expected that the interest in a neoadjuvant approach will increase. Certainly, this was the case for gastrointestinal stromal tumors once imitinib became available; the interest in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases has similarly surged since the availability of more effective chemotherapies.