NEO Biblio 2011 - Hogrefe Psykologiförlaget AB

152 Pages·2011·2.12 MB·English

by  Dawn Pittaro

6/30/11
1
NEO Inventories
Bibliography for the
NEO Personality Inventory-3 (NEO-PI-3)
Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R™)
and NEO Five-Factor Inventory-3 (NEO-FFI-3)
______________________________________________________________________
Paul T. Costa, Jr., Ph.D., and Robert R. McCrae, Ph.D.

Note: Articles are listed under one heading, but may be relevant to several. Users
are advised to search the entire bibliography for relevant terms.

Personality Structure and Assessment................................................................. 2

Personality Correlates ................................................................................. 31

Counseling, Clinical Psychology, and Psychiatry ..................................... 62

Stress, Coping, and Well-Being .................................................................. 90

Behavioral and Molecular Genetics ........................................................... 99

Personality Development and Aging ........................................................ 107

Health Psychology, Behavioral Medicine, and Biological Psychology .. 117

Industrial/Organizational and Career Psychology ................................. 134

Reviews and Commentary ........................................................................ 148

Translations ................................................................................................ 150
6/30/11
2
Personality Structure and Assessment
Ahn, C. K., & Chae, J. H. (1997). Standardization of the Korean version of the Revised NEO Personality
Inventory. Korean Journal of Counseling & Psychotherapy, 9, 443-473.
AkIn, A., Eroglu, Y., KayIs, A. R., & SatIcI, S. A. (2010). The validity and reliability of the Turkish
version of the relational-interdependent self-construal scale. Procedia - Social and Behavioral
Sciences, 5, 579-584.
Akrami, N., Hedlund, L., & Ekehammar, B. (2007). Personality scale response latencies as self-schema
indicators: The inverted-U effect revisited. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 611-618.
Allik, J., & McCrae, R. R. (2004). Escapable conclusions: Toomela (2003) and the universality of trait
structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 261-265.
Allik, J., Mõttus, R., & Realo, A. (2010). Does national character reflect mean personality traits when
both are measured by the same instrument? Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 62-69.
Allik, J., Realo, A., Mõttus, R., & Kuppens, P. (2010). Generalizability of self-other agreement from one
personality trait to another. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 128-132.
Allik, J., Realo, A., Mõttus, R., Borkenau, P., Kuppens, P., & Hrebícková, M. (2010). How people see
others is different from how people see themselves: a replicable pattern across cultures. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 870-882.
Allik, J., Realo, A., Mõttus, R., Esko, T., Pullat, J., & Metspalu, A. (2010). Variance determines self-
observer agreement on the Big Five personality traits. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 421-
426.
Almeida, L., Azevedo, B., Nunes, T., Vaz-da-Silva, M., & Soares-da-Silva, P. (2007). Why healthy
subjects volunteer for Phase I studies and how they perceive their participation? European Journal of
Clinical Pharmacology, 63, 1085-1094.
Aluja, A., García, Ó., & García, L. F. (2002). A comparative study of Zuckerman’s three structural
models for personality through the NEO-PI-R, ZKPQ-III-R, EPQ-RS and Goldberg’s 50-bipolar
adjectives. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 713-726.
Aluja, A., García, Ó., & García, L. F. (2003). Psychometric proterties of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman
personality questionnaire (ZKPQ-III-R): A study of a shortened form. Personality and Individual
Differences, 34, 1083-1098.
Aluja, A., Garcia, O., & Garcia, L. F. (2004). Replicability of the three, four and five Zuckerman's
personality super-factors: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of the EPQ-RS, ZKPQ and
NEO-PI-R. Personality & Individual Differences, 36, 1093-1108.
Aluja, A., Garcia, O., Garcia, L. F., & Seisdedos, N. (2005). Invariance of the NEO-PI-R factor structure
across exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Personality and Individual Differences, 38,
1879-1889.
Aluja, A., Garcia, O., Rossier, J., & Garcia, L. F. (2005). Comparison of the NEO-FFI, the NEO-FFI-R
and an alternative short version of the NEO-PI-R (NEO-60) in Swiss and Spanish samples.
Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 591-604.
Aluja, A., Kuhlman, M., & Zuckerman, M. (2010). Development of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman-Aluja
Personality Questionnaire (ZKA-PQ): A factor/facet version of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personality
Questionnaire (ZKPQ). Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, 416-431.
Aluja, A., Rossier, J., Garcia, L. F., & Verardi, S. (2005). The 16PF5 and the NEO-PI-R in Spanish and
Swiss samples: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Individual Differences, 26, 53-62.
Andersen., P., & Nordvik, H. (2002). Possible Barnum effect in the Five-Factor Model: Do respondents
accept random NEO Personality Inventory-Revised scores as their actual trait profile? Psychological
Reports, 90, 539-545.
Angleitner, A., & Ostendorf, F. (1994). Temperament and the Big Five factors of personality. In C. F.
Halverson, Jr., G. A. Kohnstamm, & R. P. Martin (Eds.), The developing structure of temperament
and personality from infancy to adulthood (pp. 69-90). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6/30/11
3
Angleitner, A., Riemann, R., & Spinath, F. M. (2004). Investigating the ZKPQ-III-R: Psychometric
properties, relations to the Five-Factor Model, and genetic and environmental Influences on its scales
and facets. In R. M. Stelmack, (Ed), On the psychobiology of personality: Essays in honor of Marvin
Zuckerman. (89-105). New York: Elsevier Science.
Ansell, E. B., & Pincus, A. L. (2004). Interpersonal perceptions of the Five-Factor Model of personality:
An examination using the structural summary method for circumplex data. Multivariate Behavior
Research, 39, 167-201.
Asendorpf, J. B., Borkenau, P., Ostendorf, F., & van Aken, M. A. G. (2001). Carving personality
description at its joints: Confirmation of three replicable personality prototypes for both children and
adults. European Journal of Personality, 15, 169-198.
Austin, E. J., Deary, I. J., & Egan, V. (2006). Individual differences in response scale use: Mixed Rasch
modelling of responses to NEO-FFI items. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1235-1245.
Austin, E. J., Deary, I. J., Gibson, G. J., McGregor, M. J., & Schouten, E. (1998). Individual response
spread in self-report scales: Personality correlations and consequences. Personality and Individual
Differences, 24, 421-438.
Avdeyeva, T. V. (2005). Testing the cross-cultural generalizability of personality types: A Philippine
study. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 66(1-B), 198.
Averill, J. R. (1999). Individual differences in emotional creativity: Structure and correlates. Journal of
Personality, 67, 331-371.
Avia, M. D., Sanz, J., Sanchez, M., & Silva, F.(1993, July). The Five-Factor Model in Spain: Relations of
the NEO-PI with other variables. In M. D. Avia (Chair), The Five-Factor Model in Europe: Recent
developments. Symposium presented at the Sixth Meeting of the International Society for the Study
of Individual Differences, Baltimore, MD.
Avia, M. D., Sanz, J., Sánchez-Bernardos, Martínez-Arias, Silva, R., & Graña, J. L. (1995). The Five-
Factor Model--II. Relations of the NEO-PI with other personality variables. Personality and
Individual Differences, 19, 81-97.
Aziz, S. & Jackson, C. J. (2001). A comparison between three- and Five-Factor Models of Pakistani
personality data. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 1311-1319.
Bäccman, C., & Carlstedt, B. (2010). A construct validation of a Profession-Focused Personality
Questionnaire (PQ) Versus the FFPI and the SIMP. European Journal of Psychological Assessment,
26, 136-142.
Backenstrass, M., Joest, K., Gehrig, N., Pfeiffer, N., Mearns, J., & Catanzaro, S. J. (2010). The German
version of the Generalized Expectancies for Negative Mood Regulation Scale: A construct validity
study. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 26, 28-38.
Bäckström, M., Björklund, F., & Larsson, M. R. (2009). Five-factor inventories have a major general
factor related to social desirability which can be reduced by framing items neutrally. Journal of
Research in Personality, 43, 335-344.
Baeckstroem, M., & Holmes, B. M. (2001). Measuring adult attachment: A construct validation of two
self-report instruments. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,42, 79-86.
Baer, R. A. (Chair). (2000, August). Validity scales for the NEO-PI-R. Symposium presented at the 108th
Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
Bagby, R. M., & Marshall, M. B. (2003). Positive impression management and its influence on the
Revised NEO Personality Inventory: A comparison of analog and differential prevalence group
designs. Psychological Assessment, 2002, 15, 333-339.
Ballenger, J. F.. Detecting positive impression management on the NEO-PI-R in a clinical population.
Dissertation Abstracts International, 61(7), 3829B.
Balluerka, N., Gorostiaga, A., Alonso-Arbiol, I., & Haranburu, M. (2007). Test adaptation to other
cultures: A practical approach. Psicothema, 19, 124-133.
Barbaranelli, C. (1993). Il modello dei Cinque Fattori: Analisi congiunta delle Comrey Personality Scales,
del Questionario dei Cinque Fattori e del NEO Personality Inventory [The Five-Factor Model:
Compared analyses of Comrey Personality Scales, Five-Factor Questionnaire, and NEO Personality
6/30/11
4
Inventory]. Ricerche-di-Psicologia, 17, 33-51.
Barbaranelli, C. (2002). Evaluating cluster analysis solutions: An application to the Italian NEO
Personality Inventory. European Journal of Personality, 16, S43-S55.
Becker, G. (2006). NEO-FFI scores in college men and women: A view from McDonald’s unified
treatment of test theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 911-941.
Becker, P. (1996). How big are the Big Five? Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische
Psychologie, 17, 209-221.
Becker, P. (1999). Beyond the Big Five. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 511-530.
Becker, P. (2004). About invariance and intercorrelation of factores in the Revised NEO Personality
Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and the Trier Integrated Personality Inventory (TIPI). Diagnostica, 50, 39-48.
Beckmann, N., Wood, R. E., & Minbashian, A. (2010). It depends how you look at it: On the relationship
between Neuroticism and Conscientiousness at the within- and the between-person levels of analysis.
Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 593-601.
Bedford, A., Watson, R., Henry, J. D., Crawford, J. R., & Deary, I. J. (2010). Mokken scaling analyses of
the Personal Disturbance Scale (DSSI/sAD) in large clinical and non-clinical samples. Personality
and Individual Differences, 50, 38-42.
Benet-Martínez, V., & John, O. P. (1998). Los Cinco Grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: Multi-
trait, multi-method analyses of the Big Five in Spanish and English. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 75, 729-750.
Berry, D. S., & Hansen, J. S. (1996). Positive affect, negative affect, and social interaction. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 796-809.
Berry, D. T. R., Bagby, R. M., Smerz, J., Rinaldo, J. C., Caldwell-Andrews, A., & Baer, R. A. (2001).
Effectiveness of NEO-PI-R research validity scales for discriminating analog malingering and
genuine psychopathology. Journal of Personality Assessment, 76, 496-516.
Blackburn, R., Renwick, S. J., D; Donnelly, J. P., & Logan, C. (2004). Big Five or Big Two?
Superordinate factors in the NEO Five Factor Inventory and the Antisocial Personality Questionnaire.
Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 957-970.
Blais, M. A. (2010). The common structure of normal personality and psychopathology: Preliminary
exploration in a non-patient sample Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 322-326.
Bleidorn, W., Kandler, C., Hülsheger, U. R., Riemann, R., Angleitner, A., & Spinath, F. M. (2010).
Nature and nurture of the interplay between personality traits and major life goals. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 366-379.
Blickle, G. (1995). Conceptualization and measurement of argumentativeness: A decade later.
Psychological Reports, 77, 99-110.
Bodunov, M., V., Bezdenezhnykh, B. N., & Akexandrov, Y. I. (1996). Peculiarities of psychodiagnostic
test item responses and the structure of individual experience [Russian]. Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal,
17, 87-96.
Boehm, B., Asendorpf, J. B., & Avia, M. D. (2002). Replicable types and subtypes of personality:
Spanish NEO-PI samples. European Journal of Personality, 16, S25-S41.
Borkanau, P., & Ostendorf, F. (1989). Untersuchungen zum Fünf-Factoren-Modell der Persönlichkeit und
seiner diagnostischen Erfassung [Investigations of the Five-Factor Model of personality and its
assessment]. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 10, 239-251.
Borkenau, P., & Liebler, A. (1992). Trait inferences: Sources of validity of zero acquaintance. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 645-657.
Borkenau, P., & Liebler, A. (1995). Observable attributes as manifestations and cues of personality and
intelligence. Journal of Personality, 63, 1-25.
Borkenau, P., & Ostendorf, F. (1990). Comparing exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: A study
on the 5-factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 515-524.
Borkenau, P., & Ostendorf, F. (1991). Ein Fragebogen zur Erfassung fünf robuster Persönlichkeits-
faktoren [A questionnaire for assessing five robust personality factors]. Diagnostica, 37, 29-41.
Borkenau, P., & Ostendorf, F. (1992). Social desirability scales as moderator and suppressor variables.
6/30/11
5
European Journal of Personality, 6, 199-214.
Borkenau, P., Brecke, S., Möttig, C., & Paelecke, M. (2009). Extraversion is accurately perceived after a
50-ms exposure to a face. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 703-706.
Borkenau, P., Mauer, N. Riemann, R., Spinath, F. M., & Angleitner, A. (2004). Thin slices of behavior as
cues of personality and intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 599-614.
Botwin, M. D., & Foley, P. J. (1988, August). Replication of the NEO-PI and its relation to EPQ. Paper
presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Atlanta, GA.
Bowler, M. C., Bowler, J. L., & Phillips, B. C. (2009). The Big-5 ± 2? The impact of cognitive
complexity on the factor structure of the five-factor model. Personality and Individual Differences,
47, 979-984.
Boyle, G. & Smari, J. (1997). The Big Five and the problem of measurement in the psychology of
personality. Nordisk Psykologi, 49, 12-21.
Bradshaw, S. D. (1997). Impression management and the NEO Five-Factor Inventory: Cause for concern?
Psychological Reports, 80, 832-834.
Bratko, D., Vukosav, Z., Zarevski, P., & Vranic, A. (2002). The relations of shyness and assertiveness
traits with the dimensions of the FFM in adolescence. Review of Psychology, 9, 17-23.
Brookings, J. B., Zembar, M. J., & Hochstetler, G. M. (2003). An interpersonal circumplex/five-factor
analysis of the Rejection Sensitivity Questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 449-
461.
Byravan, A., & Ramanaiah, N. V. (1995). Structure of the 16 PF Fifth Edition from the perspective of the
Five-Factor Model. Psychological Reports, 76, 555-560. [See also Psychological Reports, 77, 1307-
1311.]
Caldwell-Andrews, A., Baer, R. A., & Berry, D. T. (2000). Effects of response sets on NEO-PI-R scores
and their relations to external criteria. Journal of Personality Assessment, 74, 472-488.
Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., & Comrey, A. L. (1995). Factor analysis of the NEO-PI Inventory and
the Comrey Personality Scales in an Italian sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 18, 193-
200.
Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., & Livi, S. (1994). Mapping personality dimensions in the Big Five
model. European Review of Applied Psychology, 44, 9-15.
Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Borgogni, L., Perugini, M. (1993). The “Big Five Questionnaire”: A new
questionnaire to assess the Five-Factor Model. Personality and Individual Differences, 15, 281-288.
Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Hahn, R., & Comrey, A. L. (2001). Factor analyses of the NEO-PI-R
Inventory and the Comrey Personality Scales in Italy and the United States. Personality and
Individual Differences, 30, 217-228.
Caprara, G. V., Caprara, M., & Steca, P. (2003). Personality’s correlates of adult development and aging.
European Psychologist, 8, 131-147.
Carmona Monge, F. J., Peñacoba-Puente, C., Marín Morales, D., & Carretero Abellán, I. (in press). Factor
structure, validity and reliability of the Spanish version of the Cambridge Worry Scale. Midwifery.
Carrillo-de-la-Pena, M. T. (1995, July). Impulsiveness and sensitivity to reward: Their place in Eysenck's
and Costa and McCrae's personality spaces. Paper presented at the Seventh Meeting of the
International Society for the Study of Individual Differences, Warsaw, Poland.
Caruso, J. C. (2000). Reliability generalization of the NEO Personality scales. Educational and
Psychological Measurement, 60, 236-254.
Caruso, J. C., & Cliff, N. (1997). An examination of the Five-Factor Model of normal personality
variation with reliable component analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 23, 317-325.
Casey, M. M. (1999). Response latency to computer administered personality inventory items: A method
to control for reading speed and item length. Dissertation Abstracts International, 59(8), 4530B.
Catanzaro, J. M. (1997). The effect of response latencies on the validity of personality scales.
Dissertation Abstracts International, 58(4), 2112B.
Cattell, H. E. P. (1995). Some comments on a factor analysis of the 16PF and the NEO Personality
Inventory-Revised. Psychological Reports, 77, 1307-1311.
6/30/11
6
Cawley, M. J. (2000). A virtues approach to personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 997-
1013.
Chapman, B. P. (2007). Bandwidth and fidelity on the NEO Five-Factor Inventory: Replicability and
reliability of Saucier's (1998) item cluster subcomponents. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88,
220-234.
Chapman, B. P., & Hayslip, B., Jr. (2005). Incremental validity of a measure of emotional intelligence.
Journal of Personality Assessment, 85, 154-169.
Chen, M. C., & Piedmont, R. L. (1999). Development and validation of the NEO-PI-R for a Taiwanese
sample. In T. Sugiman, M. Karasawa, J. H. Liu, & C. Ward (Eds.), Progress in Asian social
psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 105-119). Seoul, South Korea: Kyoyook-Kwahak-Sa Publishing.
Cheng, C., Cheng Pik Yee, L., Ng Ching Man, A., & Yip Juen Juen, F. (1991). Validation of the eight-
factor model of Chinese personality across instruments. Unpublished manuscript, Chinese University
of Hong Kong.
Cheung, F. M., Cheung, S. F., Leong, K., Ward, C., & Leong, F. (2003). The English version of the
Chinese Personality Assessment Inventory. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 417-432.
Cheung, F. M., Leong, K., Zhang, J. X, Sun, H. F., Gan, Y. Q., Song, W. Z., & Xie, D. (2001).
Indigenous Chinese personality constructs: Is the Five-Factor Model complete? Journal of Cross-
Cultural Psychology, 32, 407-433.
Cheung, F.M., Cheung, S.F., Zhang, J.X., Leung, K., Leong, F., & Yeh, K.H. (2008). Relevance of
Openness as a personality dimension in Chinese culture: Aspects of its cultural relevance. Journal of
Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39, 81-108.
Church, A. T. (1994). Relating the Tellegen and Five-Factor Models of personality structure. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 898-909.
Church, A. T., & Burke, P. J.(1994). Exploratory and confirmatory test of the Big Five and Tellegen’s
three-and four-dimensional models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 93-114.
Church, A. T., & Katigbak, M. S. (2002). The Five-Factor Model in the Philippines: Investigating trait
structure and levels across cultures. In R. R. McCrae & J. Allik (Eds.), The Five-Factor Model of
personality across cultures (pp. 129-154). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
Church, A. T., Katigbak, M. S., & del Prado, A. (in press). Cultural similarities and differences in
perceived affordances of situations for Big Five behaviors. Journal of Research in Personality.
Church, A. T., Katigbak, M. S., & del Prado, A. M. (2010). Cultural similarities and differences in
perceived affordances of situations for Big Five behaviors. Journal of Research in Personality, 44,
78-90.
Church, A. T., Katigbak, M. S., & Reyes, J. A. S. (1998). Further exploration of Filipino personality
structure using the lexical approach: Do the Big-Five or Big-Seven dimensions emerge? European
Journal of Personality, 12, 249-269.
Church, A. T., Reyes, J. A. S., Katigbak, M. S., & Grimm, S. D. (1997). Filipino personality structure and
the Big Five Model: A lexical approach. Journal of Personality, 65, 477-528.
Clark, W. B., & Newberry, B. H. (1995, July). Temperament and the five-factor personality formulations:
Some initial findings. Paper presented at the Seventh Meeting of the International Society for the
Study of Individual Differences, Warsaw, Poland.
Conn, S. R. (1993, August). Relationship between 16PF Fifth Edition Global Factors and the Personality
Research Form, California Psychological Inventory, NEO Personality Inventory, and the Myers-
Briggs Type Indicator: A study of construct validity. In P. Farber (Chair), The Revised 16PF—
psychometric issues. Symposium presented at the Annual Convention of the American Psychological
Association, Toronto, Canada.
Conn, S. R., & Rieke, M. L. (Eds.). (1994). The 16PF Fifth Edition technical manual. Champaign, IL:
Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.
Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (2002). Looking backward: Changes in the mean levels of personality
traits from 80 to 12. In D. Cervone & W. Mischel (Eds.), Advances in personality science (pp. 219-
6/30/11
7
237). New York: Guilford.
Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1986). Major contributions to personality psychology. In S. Modgil &
C. Modgil (Eds.), Hans Eysenck: Consensus and controversy (pp. 63-72, 86, 87). Barcombe Lewes
Sussex, England: Falmer.
Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1988). From catalog to classification: Murray’s needs and the Five-
Factor Model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 258-265.
Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1989, November). What lies beneath the Big Five? Facet scales for
Agreeableness and Conscientiousness. In O. P. John (Chair), The Big Five: Historical perspective
and current research. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the Society for Multivariate
Experimental Psychology, Honolulu, HI.
Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and Individual
Differences, 13, 653-665.
Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Reply to Eysenck. Personality and Individual Differences, 13,
861-865.
Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1995). Domains and facets: Hierarchical personality assessment using
the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64, 21-50.
Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1995). Primary traits of Eysenck's P-E-N system: Three- and five-
factor solutions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 308-317.
Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1995). Solid ground in the wetlands of personality: A reply to Block.
Psychological Bulletin, 117, 216-220.
Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1997). Stability and change in personality assessment: The Revised
NEO Personality Inventory in the Year 2000. Journal of Personality Assessment,. 68, 86-94.
Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1998). Trait theories of personality. In D. F. Barone, M. Hersen, & V.
B. Van Hasselt (Eds.), Advanced personality (pp. 103-121). New York: Plenum.
Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (2000). A theoretical context for adult temperament. In T. D. Wachs &
G. A. Kohnstamm (Eds.), Temperament in context (pp.1-21). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates.
Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (2006). Trait and factor theories. In J. C. Thomas & D. L. Segal (Eds.),
Comprehensive handbook of personality and psychopathology (Vol. I, pp. 96-114). New York:
Wiley.
Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (in press). The Five-Factor Model and the NEO Inventories. In J. M.
Butcher (Ed.), Oxford handbook of personality and clinical assessment. New York: Oxford
University Press.
Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (in press). The Revised NEO Personality Inventory. In S. R. Briggs, J.
Cheek. & E. Donahue (Eds.), Handbook of adult personality inventories. New York: Plenum.
Costa, P. T., Jr., Herbst, J. H., McCrae, R. R., Samuels, J., & Ozer, D. J. (2002). The replicability and
utility of three personality types. European Journal of Personality, 16, S73-S87.
Costa, P. T., Jr., McCrae, R. R., & Dye, D. A. (1991). Facet scales for Agreeableness and
Conscientiousness: A revision of the NEO Personality Inventory. Personality and Individual
Differences, 12, 887-898.
Costa, P. T., Jr., McCrae, R. R., & Jónsson, F. H. (2002). Validity and utility of the Revised NEO
Personality Inventory: Examples from Europe. In B. De Raad & M. Perugini (Eds.), Big Five
assessment (pp. 61-77). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe & Huber.
Costa, P. T., Jr., McCrae, R. R., & Martin, T. A. (2008). Incipient adult personality: The NEO-PI-3 in
middle-school-aged children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 26, 71-89.
Couch, L. L., Adams, J. M., & Jones, W. H. (1996). The assessment of trust orientation. Journal of
Personality Assessment, 67, 305-323.
Craig, R. J., Loheide, R. A., Rudolph, B., Leifer, M., & Rudin, N. (1998). Relationship between
psychological needs and the Five-Factor Model of personality classification. Journal of Research in
Personality, 32, 519-527.
Crandall, B. D. (N.D.). Item response latency in computerized personality assessment and the effect of
6/30/11
8
socially desirable responding. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences &
Engineering, 59(3-B), 1363.
Crocetti, E., Schwartz, S. J., Fermani, A., & Meeus, W. (2010). The Utrecht-Management of Identity
Commitments Scale (U-MICS): Italian validation and cross-national comparisons. European Journal
of Psychological Assessment, 26, 172-186.
Curtis, G., Kieffer, K. M, & Schinka, J. A. (2000, August). Further attempts to confirm the factor
structure of the NEO-PI-R. Paper presented at the 108th Annual Convention of the American
Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
Cyders, M. A., & Coskunpinar, A. (2010). Is urgency emotionality? Separating urgent behaviors from
effects of emotional experiences. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 839-844.
Dai, X., Yao, S. & Cai, T. (2004). Reliability and validity of the NEO-PI-R in Mainland China. [Chinese].
Chinese Mental Health Journal, 18, 171-174.
Davidson, W. B., & Logan, S. M. (1998). The development and validation of a brief Q-sort measure of
personality, the Angelo Q-Set. Psychology: A Quarterly Journal of Human Behavior, 35, 18-26.
De Clercq, B., De Fruyt, F., & Van Leeuwen, K. (2004). A “little-five” lexically based perspective on
personality disorder symptoms in adolescence. Journal of Personality Disorders, 18, 479-499.
De Fruyt, F., & Furnham, A. (2000). Advances in the assessment of the Five-Factor Model. Psychologica
Belgica, 40, 51-75.
De Fruyt, F., & Mervielde, I. (1998). The assessment of the Big Five in the Dutch language domain.
Psychologica Belgica, 38, 1-22.
De Fruyt, F., McCrae, R. R., Szirmák, Z., & Nagy, J. (2004). The Five-Factor Personality Inventory as a
measure of the Five-Factor Model: Belgian, American, and Hungarian comparisons with the NEO-
PI-R. Assessment, 11, 207-215.
De Fruyt, F., Mervielde, I., & Van Leeuwen, K. (2002). The consistency of personality type classification
across samples and five-factor measures. European Journal of Personality, 16, S57-S72.
De Fruyt, F., Van De Wiele, L, & Van Heeringen, C. (2000). Cloninger's psychobiological model of
temperament and character and the Five-Factor Model of personality. Personality and Individual
Differences, 29, 441-452.
De Leo, J. A., Van Dam, N. T., Hobkirk, A. L., & Earleywine, M. (in press). Examining bias in the
impulsive sensation seeking (ImpSS) Scale using Differential Item Functioning (DIF) - An item
response analysis. Personality and Individual Differences.
De Raad, B., & Perugini, M. (Eds.). (2002). Big Five assessment. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrete & Huber.
de Vries, R. E. (in press). No evidence for a general factor of personality in the HEXACO Personality
Inventory. Journal of Research in Personality.
Decuyper, M., De Fruyt, F., & Buschman, J. (in press). Personality dimensions measured using the
Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI) and NEO-FFI on a Polish sample. International Journal
of Methods in Psychiatric Research.
Deinzer, R., Steyer, R., Eid, M., Notz, P., Schwenkmezger, P., Ostendorf, F., & Neubauer, A. (1995).
Situational effects in trait assessment: the FPI, NEO-FFI, and EPI questionnaires. European Journal
of Personality, 9, 1-23.
Deitsch, S. E. (1997). Structure of personality: An evaluation of alternative models. Dissertation
Abstracts International, 57(11), 7263B/
Deniston, W. M., & Ramanaiah, N. V. (1993). California Psychological Inventory and the Five-Factor
Model of personality. Psychological Reports, 73, 491-496.
Detwiler, F. R. J. (1996). The Jackson Personality Inventory and the Five-Factor Model of personality.
Dissertation Abstracts International, 57(6), 4084B.
Detwiler, F. R. J., & Ramanaiah, N. V. (1996). Structure of the Jackson Personality Inventory from the
perspective of the Five-Factor Model. Psychological Reports, 79, 411-416.
DeYoung, C. G., Higgins, D. M., & Peterson, J. B. (2001, February). Socially desirable responding is
related to higher-order factors in the Big Five. Paper presented at the 2nd Annual Meeting of the
Society for Personality and Social Psychology, San Antonio
6/30/11
9
DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the
Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 880-896.
Digman, J. M. (1997). Higher-order factors of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 73, 1246-1256.
Doerfler, T., & Hornke, L. F. (2010). Working style and Extraversion: New insights into the nature of
item response latencies in computer-based intelligence testing. Journal of Research in Personality,
44, 159-162.
Dollinger, S. J., Leong, F. T. L., & Ulicni, S. K. (1996). On traits and values: With special reference to
Openness to Experience. Journal of Research in Personality, 30, 23-41.
Dollinger, S. J., Preston, L. A., O'Brian, S. P., & DiLalla, D. L. (1996). Individuality and relatedness of
the self: An autophotographic study. Journal of Personality and Individual Differences, 71, 1268-
1278.
Draguns, J. G., Krylova, A. V., Oryol, V. E., Rukavishnikov, A. A., & Martin, T. A. (2000). Personality
characteristics of the Nentsy in the Russian Arctic: A comparison with ethnic Russians by means of
NEO-PI-R and POI. American Behavioral Scientist, 126-140.
Draycott, S. G., & Kline, P. (1995). The Big Three or the Big Five--the EPQ-R vs. the NEO-PI: A
research note, replication and elaboration. Personality and Individual Differences, 18, 801-804.
Dumenci, L. (1995). The relation between the Structure of Temperament Questionnaire and other
personality domains. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 850-857.
Dunkley, D. M., & Kyparissis, A. (in press). What is DAS self-critical perfectionism really measuring?
Relations with the Five-Factor Model of personality and depressive symptoms. Personality and
Individual Differences.
Dunkley, D. M., Sanislow, C. A., Grilo, C. M., & McGlashan, T. H. (2004). Validity of DAS
perfectionism and need for approval in relation to the Five-Factor Model of personality. Personality
and Individual Differences, 37, 1391-1400.
Egan, V., Deary, I., & Austin, E. (2000). The NEO-FFI: Emerging British norms and an item-level
analysis suggest N, A, and C are more reliable than O and E. Personality and Individual Differences,
29, 907-920.
Egberink, I. J. L., Meijer, R. R., & Veldkamp, B. P. (2010). Conscientiousness in the workplace:
Applying mixture IRT to investigate scalability and predictive validity. Journal of Research in
Personality, 44, 232-244.
Ehrhart, M. G., Ehrhart, K. H., Roesch, S. C., Chung-Herrera, K. N., & Bradshaw, K. (2009). Testing the
latent factor structure and construct validity of the Ten-Item Personality Inventory. Personality and
Individual Differences, 47, 900-905.
Eidecker, J., Glöckner-Rist, A., & Gerlach, A. L. (2010). Dimensional structure of the Social Interaction
Anxiety Scale according to the analysis of data obtained with a German version. Journal of Anxiety
Disorders, 24, 596-605.
Eigenberger, M. E. (2002). Traits and biology: A response to Joseph and Howley. Psychological Reports,
91, 255-256.
El-Ansarey, B. M. (1997). The psychometric properties of NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI-S) based
on the Kuwaiti society. Derasat Nafseyah, 7, 277-310.
Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2002). Approach-avoidance motivation in personality: Approach and
avoidance temperaments and goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 804-818.
Endler, N. S., Rutherford, A., & Denisoff, E. (1997). Neuroticism: How does one slice the PI(E)?
European Journal of Personality, 11, 133-145.
English, A. D. (2004). When personality traits need a frame of reference: Enhancing the predictive
validity of non-cognitive measures. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences
and Engineering, 64(11-B), 5829.
Evans, D. E., & Rothbart, M. K. (2009). A two-factor model of temperament. Personality and Individual
Differences, 47, 565-570.
Ferguson, E., & Patterson, F. (1998). The Five-Factor Model of personality: Openness a distinct but
6/30/11
10
related construct. Personality and Individual Differences, 24, 789-796.
Fiori, M., & Antonakis, J. (2010). The ability model of emotional intelligence: Searching for valid
measures. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 329-334.
Foltz, C., Morse, J. Q., Calvo, N., & Barber, J. P. (1997). Self- and observer ratings on the NEO-FFI in
couples: Initial evidence of the psychometric poroperties of an observer form. Assessment, 4, 287-
295.
FormyDuval, D. L., Williams, J. E., Patterson, D. J., & Fogle, E. E. (1995). A "Big Five" scoring system
for the item pool of the Adjective Check List. Journal of Personality Assessment, 65, 59-76.
Fortunato, V. J. (2004). A comparison of the construct validity of three measures of negative affectivity.
Educational & Psychological Measurement, 64, 271-289.
Fournier M. A., Moskowitz, D. S., & Zuroff, D. C. (2009). The interpersonal signature. Journal of
Research in Personality, 43, 155-162.
Funder, D. C., Kolar, D. C., & Blackman, M. C. (1995). Agreement among judges of personality:
Interpersonal relations, similarity, and acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
69, 656-672.
Funder, D., C., Furr, R. M., & Colvin, C. R. (2000). The Riverside Behavioral Q-sort: A tool for the
description of social behavior. Journal of Personality, 68, 451-490.
Furnham, A. (1996). The Big Five versus the big four: The relationship between the Myers-Briggs Type
Indicator (MBTI) and NEO-PI Five-Factor Model of personality. Personality and Individual
Differences, 21, 303-307.
Furnham, A. (1997). Knowing and faking one's five-factor personality score. Journal of Personality
Assessment, 69, 229-243.
Furnham, A. (2008). Psychometric correlates of FIRO-B scores: Locating the FIRO-B scores in
personality factor space. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 16, 30-45.
Furnham, A. (2008). Relationship among four Big Five measures of different length. Psychological
Reports, 102, 312-316.
Furnham, A., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2004). Estimating one's own personality and intelligence scores.
British Journal of Psychology, 95, 149-160.
Furnham, A., & Dissou, G. (2007). The relationship between self-estimated and test-derived scores of
personality and intelligence. Journal of Individual Differences, 28, 37-44.
Gable, S. L., Reis, H. T., & Elliot, A. J. (2003). Evidence for bivariate systems: An empirical test of
appetition and aversion across domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 349-372.
Gallucci, M., Lauriola, M., Leone, L., Livi, S., & Perugini, M. (1994, July). Comparing different MTMM
methods on the Big Five domain. Paper presented at the 7th European Conference on Personality,
Madrid, Spain.
Garcia, L. F., Aluja, A., Garcia, O., & Colom, R. (2007). Do parents and children know each other? A
study about agreement on personality within families. Psicothema, 19, 120-123.
Garcia, L. F., Aluja, A., Garcia, O., & Cuevas, L. (2005). Is Openness to Experience an independent
personality dimension? Convergent and discriminant validity of the Openness domain and its NEO-
PI-R facets. Journal of Individual Differences, 26, 132-138.
Gay, P., Courvoisier, D. S., Billieux, J., Rochat, L., Schmidt, R. E., & Vand de Linden, M. (in press). Can
the distinction between intentional and unintentional interference control help differentiate varieties
of impulsivity? Journal of Research in Personality.
Gerbing, D. W., & Tuley, M. R. (1991). The 16PF related to the Five-Factor Model of personality:
Multiple indicator measurement versus the a priori scales. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 26,
271-289.
Gignac, G. E., & Powell, M. B. (2009). A psychometric evaluation of the Gudjonsson Suggestibility
Scales: Problems associated with measuring suggestibility as a difference score composite.
Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 88-93.
Gignac, G. E., Bates, T. C., & Jang, K. L. (2007). Implications relevant to CFA model misfit, reliability,
and the Five-Factor Model as measured by the NEO-FFI. Personality and Individual Differences, 43,