ebook img

Near-bottom and pelagic gammaridean amphipods in the Western Indian Ocean PDF

2004·23 MB·
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Near-bottom and pelagic gammaridean amphipods in the Western Indian Ocean

NEAR-BOTTOM AND PELAGIC GAMMARIDEAN AMPHIPODS IN THE WESTERN INDIAN OCEAN by GEORGYI M. VINOGRADOV A.N. SevertzovInstitute oftheProblems ofEvolution (formerlyInstitute ofAnimalEvolutionaryMorphology andEcology) of theRussian Academy ofScience, 33 LeninAvenue, Moscow 117071, Russia. With 10 figs and 2 tables [MSacceptedAugust 1997] ABSTRACT BetweenOctober 1988andFebruary 1989,acollectionofpelagicandbenthopelagicgammaridswas taken during the seventeenth cruise of R/V Vityaz in the tropical (Seamount Error, Mozambique Channel and Saya de Malha Bank) and subtropical (Walters Shoal) regions ofthe Western Indian Ocean. A total of2 362 specimens of34 gammaridean species were found, four ofwhich {Amaryllis maculata,Scopelocheiropsissublitoralis Ichnopus walkeriandRegalia oculata) aredescribedasnew , to science. Comparison ofthe near-bottom and pelagic samples permitted detection of a group of animals mainly confined to the near-bottom water. A key to lysianassoid amphipods of the genus Trischizostoma is given. CONTENTS PAGE Introduction 40 Materials andmethods 41 Descriptionofmaterial 43 Keyto abbreviations infigures 43 Listofspecies 43 Keytothe genus Trischizostoma 46 Discussion 77 StationList: TablesA-D 80 Acknowledgements 83 References 84 Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 112 (3), 2004:39-88, 10 figs, 2 tables 39 40 ANNALSOFTHESOUTHAFRICANMUSEUM INTRODUCTION Amphipods form an important element ofmarine pelagic communities. They inhabit the surfaceanddeepwatersoftheoceanatalllatitudesfromtheequatortothepolarareas. They do notusually form dense populations, buttheir diversity and the diversity oftheir life-forms can be high. All amphipods are ofbenthic origin, but representatives oftheir different suborders have radiated into pelagic biotopes to differing extents. Unlike the hyperiids, whichhavebecome completelypelagic, andthe caprellids and ingolphyellids, which have practically no pelagic representatives, some Gammaridea have penetrated into this biotope. The overwhelming majority of marine gammarids are benthic epifaunal species. However,onlyafewbenthicgammarideans(mainlyinhabitantsofsecludedbiotopes,e.g. wood-borers, some symbionts ofbenthic animals or highly specialized phytal animals) never leave the sea floor. The majority ofbenthic gammarideans, representing the most diverse life-forms, enter the pelagial some way or other. All stages of expansion into pelagic waters may be traced among them. Some may rise briefly into the near-bottom layer, some make regular migrations into the meroplankton, others may have a long pelagic life without losing all connection with the bottom and, ultimately there are those withapurelypelagicwayoflife (Vinogradov 1992, 1995). Lessthan4percentofmarine gammaridean species are inthis finalcategory: about 100 species of50 genera, almostall ofthembelonging to families which also have benthic representatives. Usually it is thepurelypelagic gammarideans that are capturedby samplers operating at a considerable distance from the bottom. Other gammarideans from the near-bottom layersaredifficulttocatchandthereforearepoorlyrepresentedincollections. Itisclearly necessary to carry out near-bottom trawlings as well as pelagic ones in order to obtain a completepictureofapelagicgammaridean'staxocene. However,near-bottomtrawlingis fraught with considerable technical difficulties, and consequently the ocean's near-bottomlayershavebeenstudiedtoaconsiderablylesserextentthanpurelypelagicor benthic communities. This is certainlytrue ofthe IndianOcean, where thepurelypelagic gammaridean faunahasbeeninvestigatedindetailbypastexpeditions (oftheR/VDana, Siboga, Vityaz(old)1 andothers). Thenear-bottomfaunaisknowntoamuchlesserextent. In 1974, during the seventeenth cruise of the Russian R/V Akademik Kurchatov to Peruvian coasts, hauls inthe near-bottom layerwere successfully carried out forthe first timeusing anIsaacs-Kiddmidwatertrawlwithapressurevibrationtransducer, the signal ofwhich was transmitted through the cable rope to the frequency meter mounted on the vessel. The transducerreading permitted continuous information on the precise depth of thetrawl,andsimultaneousmeasurementofbottomdepthwiththeechosounderpermitted deployment ofthe trawl in the immediate proximity ofthe bottom. In 1987 this method was used extensively during the eighteenth cruise of R/V Professor Stockman to the 1 'Old' Vityaz, historicallythethirdRussianresearchvesselbearingthisname,operatedbetween 1949and1979. Expeditionsofthe'new' Vityaz(sometimesincorrectlymentionedinarticlesas Vityaz-IVorVityaz-IT)beganin 1981. .. GAMMARIDEANAMPHIPODSINTHE WESTERNINDIANOCEAN 41 Pacific submerged ridges, Nazka and Sala-y-Gomez (Rudjakov & Zaikin 1990). That cruise, inparticular, gatheredagreatdeal ofnear-bottomgammarideanmaterial fromthis region (Vinogradov 19906). MATERIALS AND METHODS Between October 1988 and February 1989, analogous works were carried out during the seventeenth cruise of R/V Vityaz (new) in the tropical (Seamount Error Mountain (EM), Mozambique Channel (MC) and Saya de Malha Bank (SdM)) and subtropical (Walters Shoal (W))regions oftheWestern IndianOcean2 The specimens ofpelagic and . benthopelagic gammarideans collected by this expedition are the basis of the present work. Animals were collected with the following apparatus: 1 Samyshev-Aseev modification of the Isaacs-Kidd midwater trawl (IKSAMT) with transducer(see above). Trawlmouthareawas 5.5 m2 thenetwas 25 m long andmade , mm mm m completely out of5 mesh, a sieve frame (1.3 mesh, 5 length) was fitted at the cod-end. Two types ofhaul were performed: near-bottom trawling at distances of m 10-30 fromthebottom(NBT) andpelagictrawlingfarfromthebottom(PT). Inall, 28 hauls were carried out in tropical regions and 24 on the Walters Shoal, yielding 1 788 and 502 gammarideans, respectively. 2. Towed underwater apparatus 'Sound', or 'Zvuk' in the Russian language (TUA 'Sound') (Biryukovetal. 1990). Forplanktonstudiestheconstructionoftheapparatus was modified by the addition of a sampler consisting oftwo nets with mouth area 0.12 m2andmeshsize 0.178 mm. Thenetswere openedandclosedsuccessivelyusing the Tucker principle. Control signals for operation of the release gear are applied autonomously at each of the locks. Constancy of distance from the bottom was maintainedby the winch operatorusing TV images during tows nearthe bottom, and bytheapparatus' ownecho-sounderinothercases. Hauls of30to 60 minutes duration were made at distances of2 m and 30 m fromthe bottom (mfb) at each station. In all, 35 stations were sampled with the TUA (15 on the Walters Shoal) from which 61 gammarideans were taken (Note: apreliminary list ofthese species was published by Vinogradov (1990a). Here it is made more precise and given in the final variant (Table 1)). 3 BigJudayplanktonnet(BDN37/50)withmoutharea0.1m2andmeshsize0.18mm 4. Oceanicmodel ofJudayplanktonnet(ODN 80/113)withmoutharea0.5 m2 andmesh size 0.18 mm. OnecanfinddetaileddescriptionsoftheWaltersShoalandzoogeographicalanalysisofitspositioninCollete& Parin(1991). . 42 ANNALSOFTHESOUTHAFRICANMUSEUM StandardcatchinglayersduringstationswiththeJudaynetswere 1 000-500, 500-250, m 250-100, 100-50 and 50-0 from the surface. Ifocean depth at the pointwas less than m I 000 m, the lower limit ofthe deepest haul was selected at a distance of50 from the bottom. The Juday net hauls were usually accompaniedby hauls with the TUA 'Sound'. Inthis case 'Sound' worksreceivedthenext stationnumber(forexample, st. 2648-ODN and st. 2649-TUA), but catches were carried out in the same point. Only II gammarideans were taken in all catches byboth models ofthe Juday nets. Detailed information on the hauls yielding gammarideans is given in Station List (Tables A-D, pages 80 to 83). All the gammarideans captured are considered below3 , togetherwithdataonthe samplinggear, stationnumber,region,timeofcapture (D-day; N - night), depth and characteristics ofthe haul (NBT-PT for IKSAMT, n mfb for TUA 'Sound'). TABLE 1 Gammaridean abundances at different distances above the seabed (onbasis ofhauls ofTUA 'Sound' and Juday nets, number ofindividuals) Group Species TUA'Sound' Judaynets 2mfb 30mfb (near-bottomhauls) Pelagic Cyphocarisanonyx 5 3 - - C. challengeri 2 1 - Stenopleuraatlantica 1 1 - - *Eusirella lelegansjuv. 2 *Stenopleuroidesmacrops 18 4 - *Halicemacronyx - 1 - - Bathystegocephalusglobosus 1 1 Parandaniaboecki 1 - - Benthopelagic *Orchomenepelagica 1 - - *Eurythenesgryllusjuv - 1 - *Ichnopuswalkerisp. nov. 3 - - - - *Scopelocheiropsissublitoralissp. nov. 2 *Parargissacurticornis - 1 - *Ampeliscabrevicornis 1 - - *Stegocephaloidesattingens 5 - 2 *!Eusiruscrosnieri(damagedspcm.) 2 1 - *Paramoeraaustrina 1 - - - *Halicoidestambiella 2 2 *Halicoidesdiscoveryi - 1 1 NB: asterisk(*) indicates amphipodswhichwerefoundonlyinthenear-bottomhauls (inallmaterial). ForadescriptionofthecollectionofhyperiideanamphipodstakenbythesecatchesfromtheWaltersShoals^e G.Vinogradov(1993). GAMMARIDEANAMPHIPODSINTHE WESTERNINDIANOCEAN 43 DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL KEY TO ABBREVIATIONS IN FIGURES Ai-Aii-antennae I and II; L- lower lip; Md-mandible; Mxi-Mxii-maxillae I and II; Mxp-maxilliped; Pi-PVii-pereopods I-VII (pereopods I and II = gnathopods I and II); Epm - epimeron III; Ui-Uiii- uropods I—III; T - telson. LIST OF SPECIES Lysianassoidae Trischizostoma barnardi Trischizostoma tanjae Amaryllis maculata sp. nov. Erikus dahli Cyphocaris anonyx Cyphocaris challengeri Cyphocaris richardi Cyphocarisfaurei Cyphocaris cornuta Paracyphocarispraedator Scopelocheiropsis sublitoralis sp. nov. Eurythenesgryllus Eurythenes obesus Ichnopuspelagicus Ichnopus walked sp. nov. Thoriella islandica Orchomenellapelagica Hyperiopsidae Parargissa curticornis Stegocephalidae Parandania boecki Bathystegocephalusglobosus Stegocephaloides attingens Pardaliscidae Halice tenella Halice macronyx Halicoides discoveryi Halicoides tambiella — 44 ANNALSOFTHESOUTHAFRICANMUSEUM Ampeliscidae Ampelisca brevicornis Synopiidae Synopia variabilis Eusiridae Eusirus crosnieri Eusiropsis riisei Eusirella lelegans Stenopleura atlantica Stenopleuroides macrops Regalia oculata sp. nov. Paramoera austrina Superfamily LYSIANASSOIDAE (= Family Lysianassidae s.l.) Trischizostoma Boeck, 1861 The species belonging to this genus are semiparasitic. They have strong prehensile pereopods andnarrowpiercingmouthparts. The genus falls into two distinctgroups. The firstgroupincludes T serratum, T. remipesandT.paucispinosum,characterizedbytelson cleft to middle and weakly specialized mouthparts. They are symbionts of benthic animals, e.g. sponges (K. Barnard 1925). Representatives ofthe secondgroupriseup into the water column where they occupy an atypical ecological niche for gammaridean amphipods. Theyareectoparasitesoffishes,mainlyofsharks(Stephensen 1935;Vader—& Romppainen 1985). These species have telson small entire (only one T. crosnieri weakly cleft) and highly specialized mouthparts, e.g. maxillae are elongated stylets, mandibles are narrow and have well-developed incisors, maxillipeds are considerably reduced, and they have digitate grooved innerplates. It is a long time since the existing key to Trischizostoma was published in English4 (J.L. Barnard 1961) andthegenusnowincludesmorethantwicethenumberofspeciesas it did then (see Ledoyer 1978; G. Vinogradov 19906, 1991; Lowry & Stoddart 1993, 1994).Anewkeythatincludesallthe Trischizostomaspeciesknownto 1996isprovided. 4 Russiankeyto the genus Trischizostoma was publishedbyVinogradov (1991) anddoesnotincluderecently describedT crosnieriand T. richeri(seeLowry&Stoddart 1993, 1994). GAMMARJDEANAMPHIPODSINTHE WESTERNINDIANOCEAN 45 Trischizostoma barnardi G. Vinogradov, 1990 Trischizostoma barnardiG. Vinogradov, 1990/?: 37. Material m— IKSAMT: st. 2598 (MC), D, PT 400 1 specimen, 7 mm. Distribution Formerly recorded from the Pacific Ocean (submerged Nazka Ridge). Trischizostoma tanjae G. Vinogradov, 1991 Trischizostoma tanjae G. Vinogradov, 1991: 26. Material m— IKSAMT: st. 2575 (EM), D,NBT 380^100 5 cf, 5-7.5 mm; st. 2576 (EM), D, PT 50-0 m—1 ?, 6 mm; st. 2823 (EM), D, NBT 390^100 m—139 specimens, 5-7 mm; st. 2826 (EM), N, NBT 390-370 m—3 ?, 7.5-8 mm, 1 o\ 7.5 mm, 7juv., 5-7 mm. Description The description of T. tanjae published elsewhere was based on this collection, all specimens ofwhichmustbe regarded as type material. The holotype (? reif. 5 mm, from st. 2575) and most ofthe paratypes are stored in the Zoological Museum ofthe Moscow State University, Moscow (ZMMU), holotype No Mb-032 and paratypes No Mb-1013 (104specimens)andMb-1033. However,25paratypesfromst. 2823 havebeendeposited in the SouthAfricanMuseum (catalogue numbers SAM-A40854 to SAM-A40878). Distribution Found only nearthe submerged ErrorMountain (Indian Ocean). Remarks Sharks, ashas alreadybeennoted, arethetypicalhostsoffish-associatedsemiparasitic Trischizostoma. On the Error Mountain, near-bottom catches of commercial fish and shrimp trawls included numerous sharks Halaelurus hispindus (Scyliorhinidae). Sharks madeup 12percentofthetotalnumberofcaughtfishes(Scherbatchev 1989).Halaelurus hispindus may be a host ofT tanjae. During the Vityaz cruise, many H. hispindus were caughtnearthe SocotraIsland, butunfortunatelyno IKSAMTtrawlingwas done thereto catch amphipods. In otherregions, neitherH. hispindus nor T tanjae were found. 46 ANNALSOFTHESOUTHAFRICANMUSEUM KEY TO THE GENUS TRISCHIZOSTOMA 1A. Telson partly cleft 2 IB. Telson entire 5 2A. Pereopod I dactyl innermargin serrate T. serratum 2B. Pereopod I dactyl innermargin smooth 3 3A. Palm ofpereopod I very spinose 4 3B. Palm ofpereopod I scarcely spinose T.pincispinosum 4A. 6th article ofpereopod I 1.5 times as wide as long. 7th article ofpereopodVII slender (normal dactyl) T. crosnieri 4B. 6th article ofpereopod I 2-3 times as wide as long. 7th article of pereopodVII oval T. remipes 5A. Maxillipedal palp much longerthan outerplates ofmaxillipeds 6 5B. Maxillipedal palp not longerthan outerplates ofmaxillipeds 12 6A. Pereopod I 6th article oval, width exceeding lengthby at least 1.5 times 7 6B. Pereopod I 6th article ofanother shape. Widthnever exceeding lengthbymore than 1.5 times. Iflength:width ratio approximates to 1.5, the posteriormargin of6th article forms a distinct angle withpalmarmargin so that article is nearly triangular 10 7A. Pereopod I 6th article spiniferous palmarmarginwithouttriangularprocesses 8 7B. Pereopod I 6th article spiniferous palmarmarginwithtriangularprocesses T. denticulatum5 8A. Pereopod II 5th article as long as or slightly longerthan 3rd article and twice as long as oval 6th article. Pereopod III 2nd article twice as long as 5th article. PereopodVI 2nd article as long as 4th and 5th articles combined 9 8B. Pereopod II 5th article shorterthan 3rd article and not more than 1.5 times as long as pyriform 6th article. Pereopod III 2nd article not longerthan 5th article. Pereopod VI 2nd article shorterthan 4th and 5th articles combined T. macrochela6 Ledoyer(1978)didnotfindeyesinT. denticulatumbutsuggestedthattheymayhavedisappearedasaresultof preservationofthespecimen. Sothischaracterisnotincludedinthiskey. The description of T. macrochela erroneously reported that the palp of maxilla I is completely absent (Vinogradov 19906). Repeated investigation of the holotype shows that a very delicate 1-articulated rudimentarypalpofmaxillaI(withoutanysetae)ispresentin T. macrochela. GAMMARIDEANAMPHIPODSINTHE WESTERNINDIANOCEAN 47 9A. Rostrum length greater than halfhead. Pereopod VI 2nd article length hardly exceeds its width T. longirostra 9B. Rostrum length does not exceed halfofhead. Pereopod VI 2nd article length clearly exceeds its width T. richeri 10A. Coxa II maximum height equal to that ofthe corresponding pereonite. Rostrum horizontal, its top reaching beyond peduncle ofantenna I 11 10B. Coxa II maximum height equal to halfheight ofcorresponding pereonite. Rostrum rounded, its top not reaching beyond peduncle ofantenna I ... T. nicaeense 11A. Coxae II to VII decreasing in height progressively. Pereopod I 6th article approximately triangular, with pronounced angle between palmar and posteriormargins T. rashii 11B. Coxae II to IV equally high. Coxa V halfas high as coxa IV. Other coxae decreasing in heightprogressively. Pereopod I 6th article irregularly rounded T. circulare 12A. Maxillipedal palp halfas long as outerplates ofmaxillipeds. Pereopod I 6th article spiniferous palmarmargin is even. Pereopods V to VII 2nd articles posteriormargins rounded lobate T. nascaensis 12B. Maxillipedal palp is slightly shorterthan outerplates ofmaxillipeds. Pereopod I 6th article spiniferous palmarmargin forming declivitous serrations orpronounced outgrowth. At leastpereopod VII 2nd article posteriormargin is concave or skewed distally 13 13A. Pereopod II 6th article length exceeds width. Maxillipedal palp with all 3 articles approximately equal in length 14 13B. Pereopod II 6th article width exceeds length. Maxillipedal palp 2nd article twice as long as first orthird T. tanjae 14A. Pereopod I 6th article spiniferous palmarmarginwith declivitous serrations. PereopodV 2nd article posterodistalmargin skewed. Uropod III rami halfas long as peduncle T. barnardi 14B. Pereopod I 6th article spiniferous palmarmarginwith a ridge oflarge outgrowths. PereopodV 2nd article posterodistal margin forming around lobe. Uropod III rami slightly longerthanpeduncle T. cristochelata ANNALSOFTHESOUTHAFRICANMUSEUM

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.