Nationality, Citizenship and Ethno-Cultural Membership. Preferential Admission Policies of EU Countries Costica Dumbrava Thesis submitted for assessment with a view to obtaining the degree of Doctor of Political and Social Sciences of the European University Institute Florence, December 2012 European University Institute Department of Political and Social Sciences Nationality, Citizenship and Ethno-Cultural Membership. Preferential Admission Policies of EU Countries Costica Dumbrava Thesis submitted for assessment with a view to obtaining the degree of Doctor of Political and Social Sciences of the European University Institute Examining Board Prof. Rainer Bauböck (European University Institute) Prof. Ruth Rubio Marín (European University Institute) Prof. Joseph Carens (University of Toronto) Prof. David Owen (University of Southampton) © Costica Dumbrava 2012 No part of this thesis may be copied, reproduced or transmitted without prior permission of the author Dumbrava, Costica (2012), Nationality, Citizenship and Ethno-cultural Membership: Preferential admission policies of EU Countr ies European University Institute DOI: 10.2870/72944 Abstract In this thesis, I analyse justifications for preferential admission to citizenship based upon ethno-cultural grounds. My point of departure is the puzzling observation that, in matters of membership, states not only differentiate between citizens and foreigners, but also between different categories of foreigners, as well as between different categories of citizens. In the first part of this work, I explore possible justifications for boundaries of membership. I look into arguments of justice, nationalism, liberalism and democracy in order to identify principles for demarcating boundaries and for assessing various claims of inclusion/exclusion. In the second part, I address more specific questions related to the regulation of admission to citizenship. For this purpose, I examine a set of concrete rules of citizenship presently enforced by 27 EU countries. My proposal is to overcome the boundary problem by shifting the focus from the constitution of the boundary towards policies of boundary making. I affirm the principle of general openness of membership that is intended to provide normative corrections to the actual structure of boundaries. Against the common view that perceives citizenship as a fruit that is soft on the inside and hard on the outside, I argue that citizenship should be seen as soft on the inside and even softer on the outside. In order to respond to different claims of admission, I suggest breaking up the unitary concept of citizenship and distinguishing between legal, political, and identity memberships. This proposal is not meant to weaken or devaluate citizenship, but to reaffirm its essentially political value. By rejecting ideas of automatic and inherited citizenship and by insisting upon democratic recognition and commitment to political membership, I aim at recasting admission to citizenship as a transformative process through which individuals not merely receive membership but become members in a political community. I Dumbrava, Costica (2012), Nationality, Citizenship and Ethno-cultural Membership: Preferential admission policies of EU Countr ies European University Institute DOI: 10.2870/72944 II Dumbrava, Costica (2012), Nationality, Citizenship and Ethno-cultural Membership: Preferential admission policies of EU Countr ies European University Institute DOI: 10.2870/72944 Acknowledgements I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my supervisor, Rainer Bauböck, for his help and encouragement. His professional excellence and personal spark have been a true inspiration for my endeavours. I am grateful to my professors at the European University Institute who directed me and enthused me. I should mention here the names of Peter Mair, Christine Chwaszcza and Michael Keating. I am indebted to my colleagues from the EUDO Observatory on Citizenship for their guidance and support. I am particularly thankful to Jo Shaw, Gerard-René de Groot, and Maarten Vink. I am grateful to Iseult Honohan for her valuable comments on several parts of this dissertation. I would like to thank the jury members: Ruth Rubio Marín, Joseph Carens and David Owen for their willing reviews and helpful comments. I am obliged to all my colleagues and friends who helped me and encouraged me throughout these long years of searching. I am especially thankful to Ciarán J. Burke, Tomasz Gabor, Oleg Bernaz, Marija Bartl, Roxana Bărbulescu, Andrei Stavilă, and Henio Hoyo. I should not forget my football teammates from Squadra Fantastica and Loko-motiv Fiesole. I would like to acknowledge the financial support of the European University Institute. I am thankful to the whole EUI community that stood by me and my fellow Romanian researchers in difficult times. I am greatly indebted to my wife for her professional, moral and emotional support and for her great patience at all times. I dedicate this dissertation to Giulia. III Dumbrava, Costica (2012), Nationality, Citizenship and Ethno-cultural Membership: Preferential admission policies of EU Countr ies European University Institute DOI: 10.2870/72944 IV Dumbrava, Costica (2012), Nationality, Citizenship and Ethno-cultural Membership: Preferential admission policies of EU Countr ies European University Institute DOI: 10.2870/72944 Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 NORMATIVE CITIZENSHIP .......................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1.1 “Inward-‐Looking” Citizenship ........................................................................................................................ 3 1.1.2 Citizenship and Exclusion ................................................................................................................................ 6 1.1.3 Immigration and Citizenship .......................................................................................................................... 7 1.1.4 ‘Citizenhood’ and Boundary ............................................................................................................................ 8 1.2 ETHNO-‐CULTURAL CITIZENSHIP ........................................................................................................................... 11 1.2.1 Citizenship De-‐Nationalised ......................................................................................................................... 11 1.2.2 Citizenship Re-‐Nationalised ......................................................................................................................... 14 1.2.3 Ethno-‐Cultural Preferentialism .................................................................................................................. 17 1.3 THE STRUCTURE OF THE THESIS ........................................................................................................................... 21 2. JUSTIFICATIONS FOR MEMBESRHIP(S) ........................................................................................... 23 2.1 BOUNDARIES OF JUSTICE ......................................................................................................................................... 25 2.1.1 Boundaries of Cooperation ........................................................................................................................... 26 2.1.2 Boundaries of Coercion .................................................................................................................................. 29 2.1.3 Just Compensation ............................................................................................................................................ 31 2.1.4 Justice and Membership ................................................................................................................................. 34 2.2 NATIONALIST BOUNDARIES .................................................................................................................................... 37 2.2.1 The Morality of Nations ................................................................................................................................. 38 2.2.2 National Self-‐Determination ....................................................................................................................... 41 Walzer – The Right of Communities to Self-‐Definition .............................................................................................................. 41 Miller – Statist Nationality ..................................................................................................................................................................... 43 Tamir – The Individual Right to Culture .......................................................................................................................................... 47 Gans – National-‐Based Admission ...................................................................................................................................................... 48 2.2.3 Nationalism and Membership ..................................................................................................................... 50 2.3 LIBERAL AND DEMOCRATIC PROPOSALS .............................................................................................................. 53 2.3.1 Consent and Freedom of Association ....................................................................................................... 54 2.3.2 All Affected Interests ....................................................................................................................................... 58 2.3.3 Subjection to State Coercive Power .......................................................................................................... 59 2.3.4 Genuine Membership ...................................................................................................................................... 65 2.3.5 Democratic Recognition ................................................................................................................................ 68 2.4 CHAPTER CONCLUSIONS .......................................................................................................................................... 75 3. NATIONALITY IN PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW ......................................................................... 81 3.1 NATIONALITY AND STATE SOVEREIGNTY ............................................................................................................ 83 3.1.1 Nationality as Domaine Reservé ................................................................................................................ 83 3.1.2 The Doctrine of Genuine Link ...................................................................................................................... 85 3.1.3 The Principle of Avoiding Multiple Nationality ................................................................................... 89 3.2 NATIONALITY AND HUMAN RIGHTS ...................................................................................................................... 93 3.2.1 The Principle of Avoiding Statelessness .................................................................................................. 94 3.2.2 The Principle of Non-‐Discrimination ....................................................................................................... 95 3.3 NATIONALITY, NATIONALISM AND MINORITY PROTECTION ........................................................................ 101 3.3.1 The Principle of Self-‐Determination ...................................................................................................... 101 3.3.2 Nationality and the Protection of Ethno-‐National Minorities ................................................... 104 3.3.3 Kin-‐States and Kin Minorities .................................................................................................................. 107 3.4 MEMBER STATE NATIONALITY AND THE EUROPEAN UNION ....................................................................... 113 3.4.1 EU Citizenship and Member State Nationality ................................................................................. 113 3.4.2 Solidarity among Member States ........................................................................................................... 117 3.4.3 Respect for National Identities ................................................................................................................ 118 3.5 CHAPTER CONCLUSIONS ....................................................................................................................................... 121 V Dumbrava, Costica (2012), Nationality, Citizenship and Ethno-cultural Membership: Preferential admission policies of EU Countr ies European University Institute DOI: 10.2870/72944 4. BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP ............................................................................................................... 125 4.1 RULES OF BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP IN THE EU27 ....................................................................................... 127 4.1.1 Rules of Ius Sanguinis .................................................................................................................................. 127 4.1.2 Rules of Ius Soli ............................................................................................................................................... 128 4.2 BIRTHRIGHT STATUS AND LEGAL PROTECTION .............................................................................................. 131 4.2.1 Arbitrary Status ............................................................................................................................................. 131 4.2.2 Legal Protection ............................................................................................................................................. 133 4.3 BIRTHRIGHT STATUS AND POLITICAL MEMBERSHIP ..................................................................................... 139 4.3.1 Liberal Consent ............................................................................................................................................... 139 4.3.2 Democratic Continuity ................................................................................................................................ 145 4.4 ETHNO-‐CULTURAL BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP ................................................................................................ 149 4.4.1 Historical Perspective .................................................................................................................................. 149 4.4.2 Perpetual Ius Sanguinis Abroad .............................................................................................................. 150 4.4.3 Absent or Inadequate Ius Soli .................................................................................................................. 152 4.5 CHAPTER CONCLUSIONS ....................................................................................................................................... 155 5. NATURALISATION ................................................................................................................................ 157 5.1 RULES OF REGULAR NATURALISATION IN EU27 ............................................................................................ 159 5.1.1 Residence ........................................................................................................................................................... 159 5.1.2 Multiple Citizenship ...................................................................................................................................... 159 5.1.3 Knowledge and Skills ................................................................................................................................... 160 5.1.4 Self-‐Sufficiency and Good Character ..................................................................................................... 161 5.2 SOCIO-‐CULTURAL INTEGRATION ........................................................................................................................ 163 5.2.1 Turning Residents into Citizens ............................................................................................................... 165 5.2.2 Making Loyal Citizens .................................................................................................................................. 166 5.2.3 Making Skilled Citizens ............................................................................................................................... 168 5.2.4 Making Worthy Citizens ............................................................................................................................. 171 5.2.5 Welcoming Ethno-‐Cultural Siblings ...................................................................................................... 173 5.3 FROM INTEGRATION TO RECOGNITION ............................................................................................................. 177 5.4 CHAPTER CONCLUSIONS ....................................................................................................................................... 183 6. PREFERENTIAL ADMISSION ............................................................................................................. 185 6.1 RULES OF PREFERENTIAL ADMISSION IN EU27 ............................................................................................. 187 6.1.1 Former Citizens and Descendants .......................................................................................................... 188 6.1.2 Citizens of Particular States ...................................................................................................................... 191 6.1.3 Ethno-‐Cultural Relatives ............................................................................................................................ 193 6.2 ETHNO-‐CULTURAL PREFERENTIALISM ............................................................................................................. 197 6.2.1 Political Self-‐Definition ............................................................................................................................... 198 6.2.2 Duties of Justice .............................................................................................................................................. 199 6.2.3 National Survival ........................................................................................................................................... 202 6.3 EXTERNAL CITIZENSHIP ....................................................................................................................................... 211 6.3.1 Citizenship Equality ...................................................................................................................................... 217 6.3.2 Special Contribution ..................................................................................................................................... 218 6.3.3 Special Ties ....................................................................................................................................................... 221 6.4 CHAPTER CONCLUSIONS ....................................................................................................................................... 223 7. CONCLUSIONS ........................................................................................................................................ 227 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................................... 233 VI Dumbrava, Costica (2012), Nationality, Citizenship and Ethno-cultural Membership: Preferential admission policies of EU Countr ies European University Institute DOI: 10.2870/72944 1. INTRODUCTION Rules of citizenship distinguish between members and non-members of particular political communities. While recognising certain individuals as citizens, these rules turn all others into foreigners. However, rules of citizenship do not only differentiate between citizens and non- citizens; they also differentiate between different categories of citizens and foreigners. In particular circumstances, certain categories of citizens are deemed worthier than others to uphold the status of citizenship. By virtue of certain personal characteristics or of some special relationship with the state, certain foreigners are held ‘dearer’, worthier, or more ready for citizenship than others. In these cases, the division is not between citizens and non- citizens, but rather between citizens and lesser citizens, and between foreigners and lesser foreigners. Citizenship does not only help to define membership anew; it also works as a device for the recognition or confirmation of membership for people who are allegedly in a special relationship with the community of members. In this respect, those persons who are like citizens in some essential ways are recognised and accepted as citizens. This sort of preferential admission can take different forms. A socialist state may recognize as citizens only those individuals who are commitment to socialism. A theocratic state may reserve membership only to individuals of its particular faith. A state that defines itself essentially as an ethno-national community may ask new members to prove that they share or celebrate some fundamental ethno-cultural features. In this thesis, I focus on one particular type of preferential admission to citizenship, namely preferential admission based on ethno-cultural grounds. The key question is: what are the justifications for ethno-cultural preferences in admission to citizenship? I address the issue of preferential admission to citizenship in the light of both general normative principles and specific legal regulations. First, I look into general normative principles that inform our thinking regarding citizenship and admission. Second, I discuss several rules of admission that are likely to amount to ethno-cultural preferentialism. My intention is to bring the theoretical and the empirical in conversation with one another. After a discussion of theoretical arguments concerning admission to citizenship, I develop a comparative study of citizenship rules in 27 member states of the European Union (EU27). By assessing concrete rules of citizenship against general theoretical principles, I arrive at several normative standards that sketch an applied theory of admission to citizenship. 1 Dumbrava, Costica (2012), Nationality, Citizenship and Ethno-cultural Membership: Preferential admission policies of EU Countr ies European University Institute DOI: 10.2870/72944 In this chapter, I first discuss the concept of citizenship by exposing its inclusionary- exclusionary dialectic. Then, I introduce the issue of ethno-cultural preferentialism in admission to citizenship. 2 Dumbrava, Costica (2012), Nationality, Citizenship and Ethno-cultural Membership: Preferential admission policies of EU Countr ies European University Institute DOI: 10.2870/72944
Description: