ebook img

Nationality, Citizenship and Ethno-Cultural Membership. Preferential Admission Policies of EU ... PDF

256 Pages·2012·2.08 MB·English
by  
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Nationality, Citizenship and Ethno-Cultural Membership. Preferential Admission Policies of EU ...

Nationality, Citizenship and Ethno-Cultural Membership. Preferential Admission Policies of EU Countries Costica Dumbrava Thesis submitted for assessment with a view to obtaining the degree of Doctor of Political and Social Sciences of the European University Institute Florence, December 2012 European University Institute Department of Political and Social Sciences Nationality, Citizenship and Ethno-Cultural Membership. Preferential Admission Policies of EU Countries Costica Dumbrava Thesis submitted for assessment with a view to obtaining the degree of Doctor of Political and Social Sciences of the European University Institute Examining Board Prof. Rainer Bauböck (European University Institute) Prof. Ruth Rubio Marín (European University Institute) Prof. Joseph Carens (University of Toronto) Prof. David Owen (University of Southampton) © Costica Dumbrava 2012 No part of this thesis may be copied, reproduced or transmitted without prior permission of the author Dumbrava, Costica (2012), Nationality, Citizenship and Ethno-cultural Membership: Preferential admission policies of EU Countr ies European University Institute DOI: 10.2870/72944 Abstract In this thesis, I analyse justifications for preferential admission to citizenship based upon ethno-cultural grounds. My point of departure is the puzzling observation that, in matters of membership, states not only differentiate between citizens and foreigners, but also between different categories of foreigners, as well as between different categories of citizens. In the first part of this work, I explore possible justifications for boundaries of membership. I look into arguments of justice, nationalism, liberalism and democracy in order to identify principles for demarcating boundaries and for assessing various claims of inclusion/exclusion. In the second part, I address more specific questions related to the regulation of admission to citizenship. For this purpose, I examine a set of concrete rules of citizenship presently enforced by 27 EU countries. My proposal is to overcome the boundary problem by shifting the focus from the constitution of the boundary towards policies of boundary making. I affirm the principle of general openness of membership that is intended to provide normative corrections to the actual structure of boundaries. Against the common view that perceives citizenship as a fruit that is soft on the inside and hard on the outside, I argue that citizenship should be seen as soft on the inside and even softer on the outside. In order to respond to different claims of admission, I suggest breaking up the unitary concept of citizenship and distinguishing between legal, political, and identity memberships. This proposal is not meant to weaken or devaluate citizenship, but to reaffirm its essentially political value. By rejecting ideas of automatic and inherited citizenship and by insisting upon democratic recognition and commitment to political membership, I aim at recasting admission to citizenship as a transformative process through which individuals not merely receive membership but become members in a political community. I Dumbrava, Costica (2012), Nationality, Citizenship and Ethno-cultural Membership: Preferential admission policies of EU Countr ies European University Institute DOI: 10.2870/72944 II Dumbrava, Costica (2012), Nationality, Citizenship and Ethno-cultural Membership: Preferential admission policies of EU Countr ies European University Institute DOI: 10.2870/72944 Acknowledgements I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my supervisor, Rainer Bauböck, for his help and encouragement. His professional excellence and personal spark have been a true inspiration for my endeavours. I am grateful to my professors at the European University Institute who directed me and enthused me. I should mention here the names of Peter Mair, Christine Chwaszcza and Michael Keating. I am indebted to my colleagues from the EUDO Observatory on Citizenship for their guidance and support. I am particularly thankful to Jo Shaw, Gerard-René de Groot, and Maarten Vink. I am grateful to Iseult Honohan for her valuable comments on several parts of this dissertation. I would like to thank the jury members: Ruth Rubio Marín, Joseph Carens and David Owen for their willing reviews and helpful comments. I am obliged to all my colleagues and friends who helped me and encouraged me throughout these long years of searching. I am especially thankful to Ciarán J. Burke, Tomasz Gabor, Oleg Bernaz, Marija Bartl, Roxana Bărbulescu, Andrei Stavilă, and Henio Hoyo. I should not forget my football teammates from Squadra Fantastica and Loko-motiv Fiesole. I would like to acknowledge the financial support of the European University Institute. I am thankful to the whole EUI community that stood by me and my fellow Romanian researchers in difficult times. I am greatly indebted to my wife for her professional, moral and emotional support and for her great patience at all times. I dedicate this dissertation to Giulia. III Dumbrava, Costica (2012), Nationality, Citizenship and Ethno-cultural Membership: Preferential admission policies of EU Countr ies European University Institute DOI: 10.2870/72944 IV Dumbrava, Costica (2012), Nationality, Citizenship and Ethno-cultural Membership: Preferential admission policies of EU Countr ies European University Institute DOI: 10.2870/72944 Table of Contents 1.  INTRODUCTION  ..........................................................................................................................................  1   1.1  NORMATIVE  CITIZENSHIP  ..........................................................................................................................................  3   1.1.1  “Inward-­‐Looking”  Citizenship  ........................................................................................................................  3   1.1.2  Citizenship  and  Exclusion  ................................................................................................................................  6   1.1.3  Immigration  and  Citizenship  ..........................................................................................................................  7   1.1.4  ‘Citizenhood’  and  Boundary  ............................................................................................................................  8   1.2  ETHNO-­‐CULTURAL  CITIZENSHIP  ...........................................................................................................................  11   1.2.1  Citizenship  De-­‐Nationalised  .........................................................................................................................  11   1.2.2  Citizenship  Re-­‐Nationalised  .........................................................................................................................  14   1.2.3  Ethno-­‐Cultural  Preferentialism  ..................................................................................................................  17   1.3  THE  STRUCTURE  OF  THE  THESIS  ...........................................................................................................................  21   2.  JUSTIFICATIONS  FOR  MEMBESRHIP(S)  ...........................................................................................  23   2.1  BOUNDARIES  OF  JUSTICE  .........................................................................................................................................  25   2.1.1  Boundaries  of  Cooperation  ...........................................................................................................................  26   2.1.2  Boundaries  of  Coercion  ..................................................................................................................................  29   2.1.3  Just  Compensation  ............................................................................................................................................  31   2.1.4  Justice  and  Membership  .................................................................................................................................  34   2.2  NATIONALIST  BOUNDARIES  ....................................................................................................................................  37   2.2.1  The  Morality  of  Nations  .................................................................................................................................  38   2.2.2  National  Self-­‐Determination  .......................................................................................................................  41   Walzer  –  The  Right  of  Communities  to  Self-­‐Definition  ..............................................................................................................  41   Miller  –  Statist  Nationality  .....................................................................................................................................................................  43   Tamir  –  The  Individual  Right  to  Culture  ..........................................................................................................................................  47   Gans  –  National-­‐Based  Admission  ......................................................................................................................................................  48   2.2.3  Nationalism  and  Membership  .....................................................................................................................  50   2.3  LIBERAL  AND  DEMOCRATIC  PROPOSALS  ..............................................................................................................  53   2.3.1  Consent  and  Freedom  of  Association  .......................................................................................................  54   2.3.2  All  Affected  Interests  .......................................................................................................................................  58   2.3.3  Subjection  to  State  Coercive  Power  ..........................................................................................................  59   2.3.4  Genuine  Membership  ......................................................................................................................................  65   2.3.5  Democratic  Recognition  ................................................................................................................................  68   2.4  CHAPTER  CONCLUSIONS  ..........................................................................................................................................  75   3.  NATIONALITY  IN  PUBLIC  INTERNATIONAL  LAW  .........................................................................  81   3.1  NATIONALITY  AND  STATE  SOVEREIGNTY  ............................................................................................................  83   3.1.1  Nationality  as  Domaine  Reservé  ................................................................................................................  83   3.1.2  The  Doctrine  of  Genuine  Link  ......................................................................................................................  85   3.1.3  The  Principle  of  Avoiding  Multiple  Nationality  ...................................................................................  89   3.2  NATIONALITY  AND  HUMAN  RIGHTS  ......................................................................................................................  93   3.2.1  The  Principle  of  Avoiding  Statelessness  ..................................................................................................  94   3.2.2  The  Principle  of  Non-­‐Discrimination  .......................................................................................................  95   3.3  NATIONALITY,  NATIONALISM  AND  MINORITY  PROTECTION  ........................................................................  101   3.3.1  The  Principle  of  Self-­‐Determination  ......................................................................................................  101   3.3.2  Nationality  and  the  Protection  of  Ethno-­‐National  Minorities  ...................................................  104   3.3.3  Kin-­‐States  and  Kin  Minorities  ..................................................................................................................  107   3.4  MEMBER  STATE  NATIONALITY  AND  THE  EUROPEAN  UNION  .......................................................................  113   3.4.1  EU  Citizenship  and  Member  State  Nationality  .................................................................................  113   3.4.2  Solidarity  among  Member  States  ...........................................................................................................  117   3.4.3  Respect  for  National  Identities  ................................................................................................................  118   3.5  CHAPTER  CONCLUSIONS  .......................................................................................................................................  121   V Dumbrava, Costica (2012), Nationality, Citizenship and Ethno-cultural Membership: Preferential admission policies of EU Countr ies European University Institute DOI: 10.2870/72944 4.  BIRTHRIGHT  CITIZENSHIP  ...............................................................................................................  125   4.1  RULES  OF  BIRTHRIGHT  CITIZENSHIP  IN  THE  EU27  .......................................................................................  127   4.1.1  Rules  of  Ius  Sanguinis  ..................................................................................................................................  127   4.1.2  Rules  of  Ius  Soli  ...............................................................................................................................................  128   4.2  BIRTHRIGHT  STATUS  AND  LEGAL  PROTECTION  ..............................................................................................  131   4.2.1  Arbitrary  Status  .............................................................................................................................................  131   4.2.2  Legal  Protection  .............................................................................................................................................  133   4.3  BIRTHRIGHT  STATUS  AND  POLITICAL  MEMBERSHIP  .....................................................................................  139   4.3.1  Liberal  Consent  ...............................................................................................................................................  139   4.3.2  Democratic  Continuity  ................................................................................................................................  145   4.4  ETHNO-­‐CULTURAL  BIRTHRIGHT  CITIZENSHIP  ................................................................................................  149   4.4.1  Historical  Perspective  ..................................................................................................................................  149   4.4.2  Perpetual  Ius  Sanguinis  Abroad  ..............................................................................................................  150   4.4.3  Absent  or  Inadequate  Ius  Soli  ..................................................................................................................  152   4.5  CHAPTER  CONCLUSIONS  .......................................................................................................................................  155   5.  NATURALISATION  ................................................................................................................................  157   5.1  RULES  OF  REGULAR  NATURALISATION  IN  EU27  ............................................................................................  159   5.1.1  Residence  ...........................................................................................................................................................  159   5.1.2  Multiple  Citizenship  ......................................................................................................................................  159   5.1.3  Knowledge  and  Skills  ...................................................................................................................................  160   5.1.4  Self-­‐Sufficiency  and  Good  Character  .....................................................................................................  161   5.2  SOCIO-­‐CULTURAL  INTEGRATION  ........................................................................................................................  163   5.2.1  Turning  Residents  into  Citizens  ...............................................................................................................  165   5.2.2  Making  Loyal  Citizens  ..................................................................................................................................  166   5.2.3  Making  Skilled  Citizens  ...............................................................................................................................  168   5.2.4  Making  Worthy  Citizens  .............................................................................................................................  171   5.2.5  Welcoming  Ethno-­‐Cultural  Siblings  ......................................................................................................  173   5.3  FROM  INTEGRATION  TO  RECOGNITION  .............................................................................................................  177   5.4  CHAPTER  CONCLUSIONS  .......................................................................................................................................  183   6.  PREFERENTIAL  ADMISSION  .............................................................................................................  185   6.1  RULES  OF  PREFERENTIAL  ADMISSION  IN  EU27  .............................................................................................  187   6.1.1  Former  Citizens  and  Descendants  ..........................................................................................................  188   6.1.2  Citizens  of  Particular  States  ......................................................................................................................  191   6.1.3  Ethno-­‐Cultural  Relatives  ............................................................................................................................  193   6.2  ETHNO-­‐CULTURAL  PREFERENTIALISM  .............................................................................................................  197   6.2.1  Political  Self-­‐Definition  ...............................................................................................................................  198   6.2.2  Duties  of  Justice  ..............................................................................................................................................  199   6.2.3  National  Survival  ...........................................................................................................................................  202   6.3  EXTERNAL  CITIZENSHIP  .......................................................................................................................................  211   6.3.1  Citizenship  Equality  ......................................................................................................................................  217   6.3.2  Special  Contribution  .....................................................................................................................................  218   6.3.3  Special  Ties  .......................................................................................................................................................  221   6.4  CHAPTER  CONCLUSIONS  .......................................................................................................................................  223   7.  CONCLUSIONS  ........................................................................................................................................  227   REFERENCES  ...............................................................................................................................................  233   VI Dumbrava, Costica (2012), Nationality, Citizenship and Ethno-cultural Membership: Preferential admission policies of EU Countr ies European University Institute DOI: 10.2870/72944 1. INTRODUCTION Rules of citizenship distinguish between members and non-members of particular political communities. While recognising certain individuals as citizens, these rules turn all others into foreigners. However, rules of citizenship do not only differentiate between citizens and non- citizens; they also differentiate between different categories of citizens and foreigners. In particular circumstances, certain categories of citizens are deemed worthier than others to uphold the status of citizenship. By virtue of certain personal characteristics or of some special relationship with the state, certain foreigners are held ‘dearer’, worthier, or more ready for citizenship than others. In these cases, the division is not between citizens and non- citizens, but rather between citizens and lesser citizens, and between foreigners and lesser foreigners. Citizenship does not only help to define membership anew; it also works as a device for the recognition or confirmation of membership for people who are allegedly in a special relationship with the community of members. In this respect, those persons who are like citizens in some essential ways are recognised and accepted as citizens. This sort of preferential admission can take different forms. A socialist state may recognize as citizens only those individuals who are commitment to socialism. A theocratic state may reserve membership only to individuals of its particular faith. A state that defines itself essentially as an ethno-national community may ask new members to prove that they share or celebrate some fundamental ethno-cultural features. In this thesis, I focus on one particular type of preferential admission to citizenship, namely preferential admission based on ethno-cultural grounds. The key question is: what are the justifications for ethno-cultural preferences in admission to citizenship? I address the issue of preferential admission to citizenship in the light of both general normative principles and specific legal regulations. First, I look into general normative principles that inform our thinking regarding citizenship and admission. Second, I discuss several rules of admission that are likely to amount to ethno-cultural preferentialism. My intention is to bring the theoretical and the empirical in conversation with one another. After a discussion of theoretical arguments concerning admission to citizenship, I develop a comparative study of citizenship rules in 27 member states of the European Union (EU27). By assessing concrete rules of citizenship against general theoretical principles, I arrive at several normative standards that sketch an applied theory of admission to citizenship. 1 Dumbrava, Costica (2012), Nationality, Citizenship and Ethno-cultural Membership: Preferential admission policies of EU Countr ies European University Institute DOI: 10.2870/72944 In this chapter, I first discuss the concept of citizenship by exposing its inclusionary- exclusionary dialectic. Then, I introduce the issue of ethno-cultural preferentialism in admission to citizenship. 2 Dumbrava, Costica (2012), Nationality, Citizenship and Ethno-cultural Membership: Preferential admission policies of EU Countr ies European University Institute DOI: 10.2870/72944

Description:
In this thesis, I analyse justifications for preferential admission to citizenship based upon ethno-cultural grounds. My point of departure is the puzzling
See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.