ebook img

NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS) 20170001311: Searching for EM Signals Coincident with aLIGO GW Candidates Using the Fermi GBM PDF

1.9 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS) 20170001311: Searching for EM Signals Coincident with aLIGO GW Candidates Using the Fermi GBM

Searching for EM Signals Coincident with aLIGO GW Candidates using the Fermi GBM Tyson B. Littenberg (NASA/MSFC) on behalf of the 
 Fermi GBM Team, LIGO Scientific Collaboration, and Virgo Scientific Collaboration LIGO/Virgo & Fermi GBM Partnership • GBM & LVC have a unique data-sharing agreement • GBM receives GW candidates in low- latency for GRB follow-up • GBM provides sub-threshold GRBs to LVC for GW follow-up LIGO/Virgo & Fermi GBM Partnership This report focuses on searching for GBM counterparts to CBC triggers. Onboard All Sky triggered “Burst” search search Sub- All Sky threshold GBM “CBC ” LVC targeted search search Sub- Targeted threshold GRB un-targeted Follow-up search The GBM+LVC follow-up searches • During O1 • GBM searched for offline CBC triggers in archival data and received “EM Alerts” for low- latency analysis • GW Offline Analysis: • Combine GstLAL & PyCBC coincidences • Use best calibration at the time (not final, but little difference in triggers) • GBM Analysis • Search for contemporaneous triggered and un-targeted GRBs • Use trigger time to seed sub-threshold targeted GBM search O1 analysis All results are still under review by LVC & GBM Selecting GW triggers PRELIMINARY Background sample Search sample • PyCBC & GstLAL offline using best -2 10 calibration available at the time -3 10 • Search sample: FAR < ~1/day -4 10 -5 10 • Background sample: FAR > -6 ~1/15min W 10 G -7 R 10 • Triggers combined into superset. A F -8 LVT151012 10 • For overlapping triggers higher 10-9 FAR discarded -10 10 GW150914
 GW151226
 -11 10 -12 10 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 t - t (days) start Search for coincident GBM triggers PRELIMINARY 1 • Find time offset between each GRB 0.9 background search found by GBM and it’s nearest CBC 0.8 trigger 0.7 • No discernible difference between 0.6 background and search . f . d 0.5 . c • 90% of samples (bkgd and search) 0.4 had offsets > +/- 104 s with nearest 0.3 triggered GRB 0.2 • No candidates from search sample 0.1 occurred within O(100) seconds of 0 2 3 4 5 a triggered GRB 10 10 10 10 |∆T| (s) Targeted search (GBM sub-threshold events) PRELIMINARY • Search algorithm developed by L. • GW150914 seed produces most Blackburn et al
 significant search result w/ FAR~2x10-4 Hz.
 [Astrophys.J.Suppl. 217 (2015) no.1, 8] [Astrophys.J. 826 (2016) no.1, L6] • Search performed over 3 template • 2nd lowest FAR is chance coincidence spectra: “soft,” “normal,” and “hard” with solar flare Combining targeted-search results PRELIMINARY • Computing False Alarm Probability [Astrophys.J. 826 (2016) no.1, L6]: • GBM transient found in follow-up of GW150914 has lowest FAP of combined search (~2x10-3 ) • GW150914-GBM significance is too low to declare an unambiguous EM counterpart. More observations are needed to reach a sound conclusion. • No other candidates had FAR< 1/100 LIGO/Virgo & Fermi GBM Partnership [Goldstein et al, arXiv:1612.02395] • New in O2 • Low latency, autonomous, sub-threshold targeted GBM search for CBC online triggers • Manual follow-up of significant “burst” candidates. • LVC receives sub threshold GBM candidates from “un-targeted” search.

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.