ebook img

NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS) 20160001806: Payload Developer Timeline Review PDF

0.17 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS) 20160001806: Payload Developer Timeline Review

MOL The Mission Operations Laboratory Payload Developer Timeline Review POIWG #39 January 26, 2016 Teri Mears EO10/TBE 256-961-2209 [email protected] MOL NASA MSFC Engineering Directorate Huntsville, Alabama The Mission Operations Laboratory Why we need PDs to review the timeline  PD timeline reviews are critical for payload success  Ensures that the POIF team is correctly interpreting payload planning requirements  Finding issues early allows us to optimize the overall timeline for the day and week  Once the STP is finalized and the timeline for the day is “baselined”, it is more difficult to incorporate any changes that impact other activities on the day  Changes after the STP is finalized require TCO to submit a Planning Product Change Request (PPCR)  Help us help you! Page 2 MOL NASA MSFC Engineering Directorate Huntsville, Alabama The Mission Operations Laboratory How can a PD view the timeline?  PDs view the timeline using OPTIMIS Viewer on the MCC-H Gateway at https://ops.jsc.nasa.gov/gateway/, under the Tools tab  Slip or contingency plans, when developed, are available at https://ops.jsc.nasa.gov/apps/prime/ops1alt/  Slip plans are typically developed for visiting vehicle docking/undock and berth/unberth  Viewer training for PDs is available on the POIF SharePoint site (https://aeon.hosc.msfc.nasa.gov)  Other Sites menu, select ISS Remote. Scroll down to the HOSC Training Videos link, then choose the OPTIMIS Viewer Training Videos link on the HOSC Training Videos page Page 3 MOL NASA MSFC Engineering Directorate Huntsville, Alabama The Mission Operations Laboratory How can a PD submit comments?  PDs are welcome and encouraged to review the timeline and provide comments!  A mature version of the WLP is available for review on Thursday, two weeks prior to the execution week  For inclusion in the Final STP timeline, comments must be submitted by 12:00 CT (1800 GMT) on Execution minus 7 (E-7) days.  Comments for Saturday and Sunday should be provided on Friday  The earlier we get comments, the more time we have to optimize the timeline  Comments are provided by sending an email to the PPM console at [email protected] and the TCO console at msfc-prep- [email protected]  We will contact you if we have questions or issues implementing your comments  You should see the comments implemented when the Final STP is published to Viewer by 18:00 CT (2400 GMT) on E-6 Page 4 MOL NASA MSFC Engineering Directorate Huntsville, Alabama The Mission Operations Laboratory Timeline development/review Execution – 3 weeks Execution – 2 weeks Execution – 1 week Execution week M T W R F S S M T W R F S S M T W R F S S M T W R F S S STP Development WLP Development M Timeline ready for T review W Expanded View: STP Development R PREP review 9:30 CT F F E-7 E-6 S S PD comments due Final STP complete 12:00 CT 18:00 CT S S Execution Timeline comments due PREP team review of final STP inputs Final STP complete/posted to Viewer STP finalized by console team (TCO) Page 5 MOL NASA MSFC Engineering Directorate Huntsville, Alabama The Mission Operations Laboratory What does the future hold?  For the future, a better method to collect and store PD comments to the timeline is in development. When this is more mature, we will notify you for testing and feedback on the new process. Page 6 MOL NASA MSFC Engineering Directorate Huntsville, Alabama The Mission Operations Laboratory

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.