D L t a P ? A el h s t t M v s t nl e e e s ni t l r t al 6 m u l a n d 0 t Upd g at 20 at syste ents architec ndler undant li red~~n ta~zdard) nism nar meetin e view compon sented ocol ha dancy ween red between paceWire s i e b e t n S oposed Redundancy Mecha ion'made at 2006 MAPLD SpaceWire Sem discussed at SpaceWire Steering Committe n: Provide reliability rationale for proposal y for of interconnection approach needs to are common for redundantnnected systems ltes at 2006 MAPLD SpW Seminar also pr edundancy at physical level for a single pro SpW is some consensus for Physical level redu standardized mecl~anism for how to switch beto ion What makes decision as to when to switch- pper layer? Rased up011 packet activity acknowledgrnei~t (outside - 01- paceWire? Based upol~ con~lectio~l status - Pr ntat sal ctio bilit -co Par ed r here ut n uest U S e o A a s e w T B Q es op li os ev o r r - e r t h - - - P P R C S s aJ C-, cd C-, v3 - F: w Cd 0 0 O.** 5a l-i Y c d " C-, 5 0 40 C/) ;'." &k G C ) O 3 0 C G G R rl