Single particle damage events in candidate star camera sensors Pauli Marshall', Cheryl Marshall2, Elizabeth Polidan3, Augustyn Wacyznski3 and Scott Johnson3 'NASA GSFC Consultant, 2NASA GSFC 3Global Science and Technology, NASA-GSFC Phone: 434-376-3402 [email protected] Outline Solar and trapped protons and shielding - Energy range and mechanisms Proton interactions in Si - - Ionization (Total Ionizing Dose TID) - Displacement damage (trapping and increased leakage) - - Single event transient effects important but not covered here Displacement damage effects in detectors - Dark current dependence on temperature - c'Universal" damage constant for "bulk" dark current - Damage distributions, hot pixels & random telegraph noise - Electric field enhancement of leakage currents Hot pixel mechanisms, introduction rates, and annealing - Onsrbit HST measurements - Laboratory measurements (WFC3 CCDs) - Implications for star camera applications: CCDs, APS, CIDs, hybrids 1 1 10 100 1000 PROTON ENERGY (MeV) Nonionizing energy loss correlates with displacement damage as LET does with ionizing dose (rads(Si)) C.J. Dale et a/., "A Comparison of Monte Carlo and Analytic Treatments of Displacement Damage in Microvolumes, IEEE MS, Vd. 41. 1994. I Vaca nc y -l nt ers t it ial able Defect - @ E 3 0 =%m..mI Displacement Damage U<ITING STABLE pARTlcLE DEFECT 0 /fa*'\ ; 0 0 0 0,a 0 0 0 4'0 0 0 0 0 0 f 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o INCIDENT Interstitial PARTICLE I-$ Vacancy -I e Dopant or Impurity Atom -Stable divacancy complex defects may also form and are important for dark current generation * Resented by Paul W We 281h Anrud #AS Gudara 6 Cow Ws-. Eb-eckmdgc. CdOraJo.F rsrUn, E9 Mo5 4 2 Proton Spectra Behind Thick Shields Trapped proton environment decrea-se s exponentially with energy and is populated out to 400 MeV Lower energy protons are stopped more easily, but all protons lose energy when transported through shield - Behind 1 inch AI, the average proton energy is >80 MeV - >Relatively few protons below 30 MeV Need to anticipate the damage mechanisms for higher energy protons (> 50 MeV) + I I A PROTON ENERGY 6-10 MeV > 20 MeV Log N b I I RECOIL ENERGY II I 11--22 kkeeVV 1122--2200 kkeeVV 3 Electrical Effects of Proton-Induced Defects -1.0@2S! Conduction Band \ 4 : \ + r. I ~~~ ' ValenceBand Generation Trapping Recombination Compensation Dark Current and Tern peratu r e mamimmu - E E E l n +Leakage W n gT emperamel fEad = 0.63 eV) Jd is bulk leakage or dark current: not FET leakage Kdariks damage factor 8 Eadi s activation energy g 3 Ed = 0.63 e V -! I k is Boltman's constant 01 I k = 8.62 E45 e V/T 2 0 0 2 2 0 240 260 280 300 Temperature (degrees Kehn'n) Tis Temperature in Kelvin Srour and Lo find that proton induced leakage from a variety of studies exhibit an activation energy of from 0.62 to 0.64 eV, and 0.63 works well for both pre and post radiation - [l]" Universal Damage Factor for Radiation-Induced Dark Current in Si Devices,' J.R. Srourand D.H. Lo, IEEETrans. Nucl. Sci., NS-47. No. 6. Dec. 2000. pp. 2451-59 W e dbY W d the tahAnru4 AAS Gud.rra 6 Omw m W .,- cdonfo.F abruTy $9- 8 4 Temporal Dark Current Fluctuations in a Pixel I 1 I I EEV ccws, 10 MeV protons 9 I A DARK CURRENT CWCd) Nonunifonnity 4 B 12 I I 1 I I I I Can Be Significant a 12Mev PROTONS Concern 000u(pERIuENT - C A L ~ T n N Measurements at 293' Kelvin High Energy Tails Due to statistics of Nuclear Reactions DAMAGE ENERGY (WV) CID Pixel volume is 1300 cubic microns: or -1/8" of reference volume after roughly 40 krad(Si) damage for highest damage level shown, so consider -300 nA/cm2 at mom temperature and -258" K to reach 10 nNcdf or the average J, *Expect more broadening of distribution due to higher proton energies P. W. Marshall, et al., ?roton-Induced Displacement Damage DistribOtions and Extremes in Silicon Microvolumes," lEEE Trans. On Nucl. Sci, NS-37. No. 6, 1990. bj'w UasM d LheZUh ARud AAS G WL Co nbd m.Be cLemdge, CdSdQ. FmbQZOOS 10 5 .- @ - HST Hot Pixels on Orbit Annealing 4l e n n m o c m m i i WFC, hot pix > 0.04 e/s . i " . I . " I ' . ' Accumulation of 0 hot pixels mandates monthly warm-ups to -0C Similar annealing 0 results observed in ng 3 HST instruments 0.2 0 1st laboratory s measurements made for WFC3 I Months 11 WFC3 Hot Pixel Experiment (1) mExI0 E H E . B i l A Hubble Space Telescope Wide Field Camera 3 E2V CCD was irradiated 0 while operating at -83 "C and the dark current studied as a function of temperature while the CCD was warmed up to a +30"C. Populations of 0 hot pixels (defined 0 immediately After Inadation as pixels having A[+1PA RqeercAiefldnES&Ynega rs Upper limit due to 55 Fe contamination more than a given 105 dark current -m :'/ threshold) were E I-d '04 - twrahcektheedrt oai hdoetn ptiifxye l I-0 encountered at any - 103 F fluence is a new hot pixel or an Threshold = 144 e-/h 8 Fluence (of 63 MeV protonslcrn2) ReMled by Pad Mastd d lheZ67h Arm& AASGuida'xe 6 CDnW cadaacc. Becktnidge. Cdora& Febmq5-9 2005 12 6 WFC3 Hot Pixel Experiment (2) @ ~ O O € C B ! 0 H H 6 B i l Hot pixel populations tracked during warm-up and cool-down. Annealing process undenrray by 40C and continues through wanner temperatures with no sharp activation energy. *The peak annealing rate at 0°C is an artifact caused by the saturation of hot pixels. WFC3 Hot Pixel Experiment (3) -@@El0 m e H B B I l Mean dark current slightly 105 elevated, but still less than 2 eJh Shape of tails 104 ears annealed changing Annealed hot +54 103 6 pixels become warm pixels 102 2 months annealed 10' 10 0 1 10 100 1000 10000 Dark Rate (e-/h) 7 0 Depending on the application either CTE (for CCDs) or dark current can be the driving radiation effect. Hot pixels may be caused by small (Coulomb) events in 0 high field regions and by rare nuclear reactions. Observed in CCDs, CIDs, APS and Si hybrid devices 0 If your tracker is cooled (even modestly) then you will 0 underestimatet he number of hot pixels by following usual proton test procedures at room temperature. .This can overwhelm the capacity of the tracker software. 8