ebook img

Nanoscale inhomogeneities: A new path toward high Curie temperature ferromagnetism in diluted materials PDF

3.9 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Nanoscale inhomogeneities: A new path toward high Curie temperature ferromagnetism in diluted materials

Nanoscale inhomogeneities: A new path toward high Curie temperature ferromagnetism in diluted materials Akash Chakraborty Institut N´eel, CNRS, D´epartement MCBT, 25 avenue des Martyrs, B.P. 166, 38042 Grenoble Cedex 09, France 2 1 0 Richard Bouzerar 2 n Institut N´eel, CNRS, D´epartement MCBT, 25 avenue des Martyrs, a J B.P. 166, 38042 Grenoble Cedex 09, France and 2 2 European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, ] i B.P. 220, F-38043 Grenoble Cedex, France c s - l Stefan Kettemann r t m Division of Advanced Materials Science, . t a Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH), m - Pohang 790-784, South Korea and d n School of Engineering and Science, Jacobs University Bremen, o c [ Campus Ring 1, D-28759 Bremen, Germany 2 v Georges Bouzerar∗ 5 5 Institut N´eel, CNRS, D´epartement MCBT, 25 avenue des Martyrs, 3 4 . B.P. 166, 38042 Grenoble Cedex 09, France and 1 1 School of Engineering and Science, Jacobs University Bremen, 1 1 : Campus Ring 1, D-28759 Bremen, Germany v i X (Dated: January 24, 2012) r a 1 Abstract Room temperature ferromagnetism has been one of the most sought after topics in today’s emerging field of spintronics. It is strongly believed that defect- and inhomogeneity- free sample growth should be the optimal route for achieving room-temperature ferromagnetism and huge efforts are made in order to grow samples as “clean” as possible. However, until now, in the dilute regimeithasbeendifficulttoobtainCurietemperatureslargerthanthatmeasuredinwellannealed samples of (Ga,Mn)As (∼190 K for 12% doping). In the present work, we propose an innovative path to room temperature ferromagnetism in diluted magnetic semiconductors. We theoretically show that even a very small concentration of nanoscale inhomogeneities can lead to a tremendous boost of the critical temperatures: up to a 1600% increase compared to the homogeneous case. In addition to a very detailed analysis, we also give a plausible explanation for the wide variation of the critical temperatures observed in (Ga,Mn)N and provide a better understanding of the likely origin of very high Curie temperatures measured occasionally in some cases. The colossal increase oftheorderingtemperaturesbynanoscaleclusterinclusionsshouldopenupanewdirectiontoward the synthesis of materials relevant for spintronic functionalities. PACS numbers: 75.50.Pp, 75.30.Kz, 75.40.-s 2 I. INTRODUCTION The hope of attaining ferromagnetic order at room temperature and above, has spurred a huge interest in the field of diluted magnetic semiconductors (DMSs)1–3 and diluted mag- neticoxides(DMOs)4–6. Extensiveexperimentalaswellastheoreticaleffortshavebeenmade to predict high Curie temperatures (T ) in these materials. Among the various materials C widely studied, one of particular interest is (Ga,Mn)N, a wide-band-gap DMS. Different ex- perimental results have reported T ’s varying as widely as 10 to 940 K7–11 with a typical Mn C content between 7 and 9%. However, recent theoretical studies, based on model calculations, have predicted a T of 30 K in homogeneously diluted and uncompensated Ga Mn N for C 1−x x x=0.0612, which is in good agreement with results obtained from ab initio based studies13 combined with the self-consistent local random-phase approximation (SC-LRPA) method. On the other hand, using the same ab initio couplings, the Monte Carlo studies lead to T C of 35 K for x=0.0614,15 in Ga Mn N. These theoretical calculations predict the highest 1−x x reachable T in homogeneously diluted Ga Mn N. Then how can we explain the very high C 1−x x Curie temperatures observed by some experimental groups? We will provide an answer in the following. From these observations crucial questions arise. How do we explain the huge fluctua- tions of the critical temperatures in these materials? Is there a systematic way to boost the critical temperatures beyond that expected in the homogeneous compounds (inhomo- geneity free)? After observation of ferromagnetic order in Mn-doped Germanium (T =116 C K for x=0.035)16, several experimental studies reported quite high critical temperatures in (Ge,Mn)films17–20. However, theunderlyingreasonswerenotreallyclear. InRef.21 scanning photoelectron microscopy measurements revealed stripe-shaped Mn rich microstructures which were believed to be the origin of ferromagnetism in Ge Mn . More recent experi- 1−x x mental studies have revealed self-organized Mn rich nanocolumns formation in Ge Mn , 1−x x which gave rise to a very high T (≥400 K)22 for x=0.06. Magnetotransport measurements, C in this case, have also shown a large anomalous Hall effect up to room temperature. The spinodal decomposition (alternating regions of low and high concentration of magnetic im- purities) was suggested to be the reason for the high temperature ferromagnetism in this case. Similar nanometer-sized clusters, with increased Mn content compared to the sur- rounding matrix, were also detected by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis 3 in Ge Mn 23. In recent experimental studies on (Zn,Co)O24, the authors claimed the 0.95 0.05 existence of two types of nanosized ferromagnetic Co clusters. The first were spherical with diameters of about 5 nm leading to critical temperatures of ∼100 K and the others were columnar about 4 nm wide, with a maximum height of 60 nm, leading to significantly larger critical temperatures of ∼300 K. These results were confirmed by high-resolution transmis- sion electron microscopy (HRTEM). Hence this kind of anisotropic nanoscale inhomogeneity can lead to interesting magnetic and transport properties. Inspite of the existence of several experimental studies, the effect of impurity clustering on magnetism in DMSs and DMOs has been weakly studied on the theoretical front. Ab initio based studies for these type of in- homogeneous disordered systems are difficult due to the large size of supercells required and no standard methods have been proposed as yet. In Ref.25 the authors have simulated the spinodal decomposition in DMS by using Monte Carlo methods and they have predicted an above-room-temperatureT forthespinodalphasein(Ga,Mn)Asand(Ga,Mn)N,calculated C from the “standard” random-phase approximation (RPA). Here “standard” means that the crucial self consistency was not implemented in the RPA calculations. However these high T s were found for samples containing a relatively high concentration of Mn, above 20%, C far from the dilute regime. On the other hand in the dilute case, for approximately 5% of Mn, the authors have found a suppression of the critical temperatures in the presence of spinodal decomposition phases. Note also that the calculations were limited to small system sizes compared to the typical size of the inhomogeneities and the average was done over few configurations only (typically 10). In Ref.26 the authors have presented density-functional theory (DFT) based calculations of N-doped Mn clusters, and have given a hypothesis that a high Curie temperature detected in some of the GaMnN samples is a result of the forma- tion of small Mn clusters carrying giant magnetic moments. The large variation in Curie temperatures could be attributed to the formation of N induced Mn clusters of different sizes in samples grown under different conditions. Their analysis suggests the importance of the growth mechanism in these kind of materials. Similar density-functional calculations on the effect of microscopic Mn clustering on the Curie temperatures of (Ga,Mn)N were also reported in Ref.27. However the T ’s were calculated from the mean-field approximation, C which is already known to overestimate the Curie temperatures in homogeneously diluted semiconductors. Inthisarticle, wepresentageneralizedandcomprehensivestudyoftheeffectofnanoscale 4 FIG. 1: (Color online)Snapshots corresponding to four different concentrations of nanospheres x ns (a)0.02,(b)0.04,(c)0.06and(d)0.08. Thegrey(red)atomsdenotetheimpuritiesinside(outside) the nanospheres. Here L=36, r =2a (a is the lattice spacing) and x =0.8. 0 in inhomogeneitiesontheCurietemperaturesindilutedmagneticsystems. Thecalculationsare performed on very large systems (finite size analysis is provided) and a systematic sampling is done over several hundreds of disorder configurations. In contrast to previous studies, we report giant effects on the T in dilute materials. In some particular cases the T can be C C enhanced by up to 1600% compared to that of the homogeneously diluted system. There are several factors that lead to these effects, such as the concentration of inhomogeneities in the system, the size of the inhomogeneities, the concentration of magnetic impurities inside the inhomogeneities and also the range of the exchange interactions between the impurities. In the following we shall see how these physical parameters play an important role and affect the critical temperatures. 5 II. MODEL AND METHOD For simplicity we have assumed here a simple cubic crystalline structure and the con- clusions that will be drawn will be general. The sizes vary from L=32 to L=44. The inhomogeneities considered here are of spherical shape of radii r . For the sake of clarity 0 and to avoid additional parameters, in our calculations the total concentration of impuri- ties in the whole system is fixed to x=0.07. In the following we denote the concentration of nanospheres by x =N /N, where N is the total number of sites included in all the ns S S nanospheres and N=L3 is the total number of sites. The concentration of impurities inside each nanosphere is defined by x . We denote the total number of impurities and the number in of impurities inside the nanospheres by Ntot and Nin (=x N ) respectively. We choose imp imp in S the nanospheres in such a manner so as to restrict their overlap with each other. In Fig. 1 four typical random configurations corresponding to four different concentra- tion of nanospheres x (0.02, 0.04, 0.06 and 0.08) are depicted. As we increase the number ns of nanospheres in the system x increases and consequently the concentration outside de- ns creases, since the total concentration (x) is fixed. Now to evaluate the T , the effective C (cid:80) diluted Heisenberg Hamiltonian H =- J S ·S , is treated within the SC-LRPA the- Heis i,j ij i j ory. The self-consistent local RPA is a semi-analytical approach based on finite temperature Green’s functions. It is essentially an extension of the standard RPA to the case of disor- dered systems. Here the thermal fluctuations are treated within the RPA and the disorder is treated exactly without any approximations. The Curie temperature of a system containing N localized spins is obtained from the expression imp 2 1 (cid:88) 1 k T = S(S +1) (1) B C 3 N F imp i i where 1 (cid:90) ∞ (cid:61)G (E) ii F = − dE (2) i 2πλ E i −∞ We define the retarded Green’s function as G (ω)=(cid:82)∞ G (t)eiωtdt=(cid:104)(cid:104)S+;S−(cid:105)(cid:105). The ij −∞ ij i j set of parameters λ =lim (cid:104)Sz(cid:105)/m, where m is the average magnetization, are calculated i T→TC i self-consistently(moredetailscanbefoundinRef1,13). TheT iscalculatedforeachrandom C configurationandthenaveragedoverafewhundredconfigurationsofdisorder. Theaccuracy and reliability of the SC-LRPA to treat disorder and/or dilution has been demonstrated 6 TABLE I: The ratio, (cid:104)Rhom(cid:105), of the homogeneous Curie temperatures for different x to that of x=0.07, for λ=a and a/2 . x (cid:104)Rhom(cid:105) (λ=a) (cid:104)Rhom(cid:105) (λ=a/2) 0.8 9.7 22 0.7 8.9 20 0.6 7.9 17 0.4 5.2 11 several times in the past1,12,28. The exchange couplings in a DMS, as found from ab initio based calculations, are rel- atively short range in nature and almost exponentially decaying14,15. Thus in the present study we have assumed generalized couplings of the form J =J exp(− | r | /λ), where ij 0 r=r -r and λ is the damping parameter. In (Ga,Mn)As, for about 5% Mn a fit of the ab i j initio magnetic couplings provides a value of λ of the order of a/2. Note that in the case of (Ga,Mn)N the ab initio couplings are of even shorter range. Thus we focus here on two par- ticular cases, λ=a and λ=a/2, where a is the lattice spacing. Although these length scales are comparable, in the presence of inhomogeneities the effects on the critical temperatures will be very drastic. In order to measure directly the effects of nanoscale inhomogeneities, the averaged Curie temperatures (cid:104)Tinh(cid:105) are scaled with respect to the averaged Curie tem- C peratures of the homogeneously diluted system (cid:104)Thom(cid:105) for x=0.07, their ratio is denoted by C (cid:104)R (cid:105). The averaged Curie temperatures (cid:104)Thom(cid:105) for the homogeneous systems are found to C C be 0.9 J and 0.05 J , for λ=a and a/2 respectively, for x=0.07. 0 0 In Table (I) we provide the averaged Curie temperatures for 80%, 70%, 60% and 40% homogeneously distributed magnetic impurities scaled with respect to that of the 7% ho- mogeneous case, for λ=a and a/2. The ratio is denoted by (cid:104)Rhom(cid:105). These values will be relevant in the discussions to follow, where we consider these types of concentrations inside the nanospheres. 7 x 0 0.0175 0.035 0.0525 0.07 ns 4 (a) r=a 0 x =0.8 3.5 rr00==√2a2a r0 in r=2a 3 0 r=√5a 0 r=√6a 〉 2.5 0 C r=√6a R 0 〈 2 1.5 1 VCA 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Nin / Ntot imp imp 2.7 (b) x =0.8 r=2a x in 2.4 0 in x =0.7 in 2.1 x =0.6 〉 in C1.8 R 〈 1.5 x =0.4 in 1.2 VCA 0.9 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Nin / Ntot imp imp FIG. 2: (Color online)(cid:104)R (cid:105)=(cid:104)TCinh(cid:105) as a function of Nin /Ntot =xinx for λ=a. (a) Results C (cid:104)Thom(cid:105) imp imp x ns C for a fixed concentration inside the nanospheres (x =0.8) and different radii r . The upper x in 0 axis represents the values of x corresponding to x =0.8. The long black arrow indicates the ns in direction of increasing r . (b) Results for a fixed radius (r =2a) and different concentration inside 0 0 the nanospheres. The long black arrow indicates the direction of increasing x . The solid red line in indicates the TVCA scaled with respect to (cid:104)Thom(cid:105). In the figures, squares correspond to L=32 and C C circles to L=36. III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Figure 2(a) shows (cid:104)R (cid:105) as a function of Nin /Ntot corresponding to the case of λ=a. The C imp imp concentration inside the nanospheres is fixed at x =0.8 and the T is calculated for spheres in C of different radii. For this concentration inside x , each nanosphere contains 5, 15, 26, 45, in 8 √ √ √ and 64 impurities for r =a, 2a, 2a, 5a, and 6a respectively. Nin /Ntot =0 corresponds 0 imp imp to the homogeneously diluted case (absence of inhomogeneities). We observe a clear increase in the critical temperatures with increasing fraction of impurities inside the nanospheres as well as with the nanospheres’ size. For about 80% of the total impurities inside the nanospheres, T is enhanced by up to 150% for the smallest nanospheres with r =a, and C 0 √ by almost 350% for the ones of radius r = 6a, which is rather significant. This increase for 0 √ r = 6a is more than one-third of that found for the 80% homogeneously distributed case 0 (Table I). Thus the clustering of magnetic impurities does lead to a considerable increase of the critical temperatures due to the strong interactions within the nanospheres. The other important point to take note of is the T obtained from the mean field virtual crystal C approximation(VCA),TVCA=2x(cid:80) n J ,wheren isthenumberofatomsinthei-thshell. It C 3 i i i i is well known that the VCA overestimates the true critical temperatures, often very strongly. However, the present results show that in the presence of inhomogeneities the VCA value can no longer serve as an upper bound. Indeed, as can be seen here, for a relatively small concentration of nanospheres (x ∼0.2) the VCA value is already exceeded and for higher ns density of nanospheres the VCA actually strongly underestimates the critical temperatures in these systems. Let us now focus on the case where the nanospheres are of fixed radius (r =2a) and 0 the concentration inside the nanospheres vary (Fig. 2(b)).(cid:104)R (cid:105) is plotted as a function of C Nin /Ntot for different x . The curves show an overall monotonous increase with increasing imp imp in concentration of nanospheres. However, the enhancement of the critical temperatures is also controlled by the concentration of impurities inside the nanospheres. Decreasing the concentration inside the nanospheres effectively means reducing the number of impurities inside a cluster of the same size, and thus reducing inter nanosphere interactions. This could explain the relatively small increase in the T values with decreasing x . However, as will C in be seen in the following, the variation of the critical temperatures is more complex than this simple picture. Thus we find that not only the relative number of impurities inside the nanospheres but also the concentration inside the nanospheres have a drastic effect on the critical temperatures in these systems. Now we move to the case of the shorter-ranged couplings, λ=a/2, which will appear even more interesting and which lead to unexpected effects. Figure 3(a) shows the (cid:104)R (cid:105) as a C function of Nin /Ntot for a fixed x =0.8. T is calculated for nanospheres of different radii imp imp in C 9 x 0 0.0175 0.035 0.0525 0.07 ns 21 (a) r x =0.8 18 r=√6a 0 in 0 15 r=√5a 0 〉 12 C R 〈 9 r=2a 0 6 3 r0=√2a VCA r=a 0 0 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Nin / Ntot imp imp 11 10 (b) xin=0.8 r=2a 0 9 xin x =0.7 8 in 7 〉 6 C R x =0.6 〈 5 in 4 VCA 3 2 1 x =0.4 in 0 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Nin / Ntot imp imp FIG. 3: (Color online)(cid:104)R (cid:105)=(cid:104)TCinh(cid:105) as a function of Nin /Ntot =xinx corresponding to λ=a/2. C (cid:104)Thom(cid:105) imp imp x ns C (a) Results for a fixed concentration inside the nanospheres (x =0.8) and different radii r . The in 0 upper x axis represents the values of x corresponding to x =0.8. The long black arrow indicates ns in the direction of increasing r . (b)Results for a fixed radius (r =2a) and different concentration 0 0 inside the nanospheres. The long black arrow indicates the direction of increasing x . The solid in red line indicates the TVCA scaled with respect to (cid:104)Thom(cid:105). In the figures, squares correspond to C C L=32, circles to L=36, triangles to L=40, and diamonds to L=44. √ √ √ (r =a, 2a,2a, 5aand 6a). WehaveconsideredsystemsizesvaryingfromL=32toL=44 0 to check for the finite-size effects. The L=44 systems typically contain ∼6000 impurities. In contrast to the case of λ=a discussed above, the variation of T with Nin /Ntot is not C imp imp monotonous anymore. Here we see a colossal effect of the size of the nanospheres on the 10

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.