Muslims and Citizens This page intentionally left blank (cid:2) Muslims and Citizens Islam, Politics, and the French Revolution Ian Coller new haven and london Published with assistance from the Annie Burr Lewis Fund. Copyright © 2020 by Ian Coller. All rights reserved. This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, including illustrations, in any form (beyond that copying permitted by Sections 107 and 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law and except by reviewers for the public press), without written permission from the publishers. Yale University Press books may be purchased in quantity for educational, business, or promotional use. For information, please e-mail [email protected] (U.S. offi ce) or [email protected] (U.K. offi ce). Set in Fournier MT type by IDS Infotech, Ltd. Printed in the United States of America. Library of Congress Control Number: 2019939489 ISBN 978-0-300-24336-9 (hardcover : alk. paper) A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. This paper meets the requirements of ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992 (Permanence of Paper). 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Contents Preface vii Introduction 1 Prologue 15 1. Paris Turned Turk 24 2. The Turban and the Axe 41 3. The Rights of Muslims 61 4. The Turbans of Liberty 82 5. The Constitutional Mosque 104 6. The Muslim Republic 125 7. Islam in the Temple of Reason 148 8. The Muslim Jacobins 169 9. Robespierre Mahomet 190 10. Bonaparte’s Burka 210 Epilogue: 1799 230 Notes 241 Bibliography 297 Index 343 This page intentionally left blank Preface In 2011, a wave of revolutions began in Tunisia and grew in force until it toppled dictatorships in Tunis, Cairo, and Tripoli; shook regimes in Bahrain, Yemen, Morocco, and Iran; and sent shock waves across Africa, Asia, Europe, and the Americas. Some commentators rushed to dub this the “Arab 1789”—as though it had taken the Arab world more than two centuries to catch up with the West. When I visited Tunis in May 2011, it was clear that this was not a delayed sequel but a seizing of historical agency in its own right—a revolution that set its own precedent, and was at the same time part of a larger seismic wave. Instead of seeing Tunisia through the lens of 1789, I saw—and felt—the experience of the French Revolution anew through the sense of universal possibility that knew no frontier of category or nation. I wanted to ask a different question about 1789, seeing it not as a matrix for thinking about later revolutions but rather as a simultaneous historical expe- rience. It is a self-evident proposition that Muslims were part of the world of the French Revolution. Yet that simultaneity has proven almost impossible for many historians to imagine: the “Muslim world,” they insist, existed in a different temporality altogether. Three decades ago, some historians came to the conclusion that the French Revolution was over—terminé—with the collapse of communism and the Soviet Union, which curiously coincided with the celebration of the bicentenary of 1789. In reality all that was “over” was an interpretation that had tied itself to this particular world-historical outcome. The waning of the classical paradigm liberated studies of the French Revolution to explore a multiplicity of other dimensions of this rich, varied, and fascinating moment. The shift in interpretation has not reduced the signifi cance of 1789: on the contrary, it has opened up a wider fi eld for understanding the ways in which the French Revolution shaped our shared modern world. This book sets out to contribute to a rethinking of the Revolution for the modern age, with a vii viii preface belief that its principles still have much to offer: it is not a scientifi c anatomy, but a living refl ection. In writing this book I was fortunate to receive a generous grant from the Australian Research Council to complete much of the research; the library staff at the University of California, Irvine, and La Trobe University provided me with invaluable support. The earliest period in the gestation of the book was spent at the European University Institute in Florence, where I benefi ted from stimulating conversations in a glorious setting, and my ideas were further extended in a visiting appointment at the University of Paris 8 in 2012. I am deeply grateful to my colleagues at La Trobe University for their support and collegiality. Since arriving at UCI, I have been fortunate to gain a wonderful range of friends and colleagues in French, European, and world history who have pushed me to think further and refi ne my arguments. Initial sketches of some of the arguments made here were published in edited collections, and I would like to thank Lynn Hunt, Suzanne Desan, William Nelson, Alan Forrest, Matthias Middell, Patricia Lorcin, Todd Shepard, Glenda Sluga, Tim Rowse, John Harvey, Konstantina Zanou, and Maurizio Isabella for all they have offered me in critical feedback and enrichment. As always, I owe a huge debt to Peter McPhee, an extraordinarily generous mentor and model, and I have benefi ted immensely from the critical advice of Tim Tackett, a towering authority on the French Revolution. I was fortu- nate to benefi t from the brilliance of the late Chris Bayly, a sorely missed mentor and friend. I owe thanks and love to many friends and family: my brothers, Ross and Matt; my sister, Jen, and her children, Leo and Lara; and my father, Bruce, a constant support. I dedicate this book to the memory of my mother, Mair, an endless inspiration and an incalculable loss. Introduction When the French arrived on the shores of Egypt in July 1798, they carried with them a brochure printed in Arabic headed by a laurel-wreathed vignette of Marianne carrying the familiar symbols of a pike topped by a liberty cap, and the fasces of the French Republic bound around an axe. Beneath this offi cial stamp ran a long string of Arabic text: “In the name of Allah, the most gracious, the most merciful, there is no God but God, he has no son, and no associate in his kingdom.” This statement of faith—a compilation of the basmala, the shahada, and the renunciation of shirk, idolatry—was made in the name of the republic. The document went further, declaring, “Tell your people that the French are also sincere Muslims” (qu¯lu¯ li-ummatikum ‘an al-fara¯nsawiyya hum aydhan muslim¯ın kha¯lis¯ın). What led these revolutionary Frenchmen to assert that they were Muslims? In his fi nal years Napoléon Bonaparte explained it as a ruse to win local support. Could Bonaparte or any other Frenchman really have imagined that Egyptian Muslims would believe it? My answer is yes. Over the course of the preceding decade, the French had come in some sense to believe it them- selves, or at least to imagine it was a plausible assertion. For reasons that emerged from 1789 and the events that followed, the revolutionaries of the 1790s came to conceive that Muslims would indeed welcome their arrival. Egypt, they believed, could serve as the bridge for the onward march of the French Revolution into Africa and Asia. The proclamation proudly cited the Revolution’s destructive assault on the Roman Catholic Church as proof that the French had abandoned doctrines incompatible with Islam. Some Frenchmen did indeed convert—notably General Jacques-Abdullah 1