ebook img

Multimedia Quality Assessment PDF

19 Pages·2010·4.93 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Multimedia Quality Assessment

Multimedia Quality Assessment Pengpeng Ni Context Simula Research Laboratory AS 2010-04-29 Content ✴ What is multimedia “quality”? ✴ How to measure multimedia “quality”? ✴ What are the difficulties and challenges? Quality of Service requirements in distributed multimedia systems Network Quality Link Quality Capacity Bitrate Coverage Frame/Bit/Packet loss Handoff Delay User Perceived Quality Speech fidelity Audio fidelity Image fidelity Video fidelity Quality of service (QoS) is defined in [ITU-T E.800] as the collective effect of performance which determines the degree of satisfaction of a user of the service. Quality of Experience (QoE) : The overall acceptability of an application or service, as perceived subjectively by the end-user. ✴ QoE includes the complete end-to-end system effects. ✴ Context Over acceptability may be influenced by user expectations and context. Quality of Service vs Quality of Experience ✴ QoS: Value of the average userʼs experience richness estimated by a service/product/content provider - Service provider-centric concept ✴ QoE: Value (estimated or actually measured ) of a specific userʼs experience richness. - User centric concept ✴ QoE is the dual and extended view of QoS problem Human centered multimedia services need measure/ predict QoE accurately. How is the quality of multimedia experience measured today? ✴ Subjective evaluation - Mean Opinion Score (MOS) rating test ✴ Objective quality metrics, estimating subjective MOS. - MOS predictors based on fidelity measures, examples include PSNR, SSIM, etc. Subjective evaluation tests ✴ International recommendation for subjective test methodologies: -Recommendation ITU-R BT. 500-11 “Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures” (1974-2002). -Recommendation ITU-T P. 910 “Subjective video quality assessment methods for multimedia applications” (1999). -Recommendation ITU-R BT. 1788 “Methodology for the subjective assessment of video quality in multimedia applications” (2007). ✴ Viewing condition, Test material, Test procedure, Measurement scales and basic statistics for data analysis. Subjective Test Methodology I Double Stimulus (DS) method Explicit reference 5  Impercep)ble 4  Percep)ble  but  not  annoying 3  Slightly  annoying 2  Annoying 1  Very  annoying Hidden reference A B Excellent A B Bad Categorical or Numerical Scale Subjective Test Methodology II Single Stimulus (SS) methods Categorical scale 5  Excellent 5  Impercep)ble 4  Good 4  Percep)ble  but  not  annoying 3  Fair 3  Slightly  annoying 2  Poor 2  Annoying 1  Bad 1  Very  annoying A 11-grade numerical categorical scale shows best results in SS method

Description:
Mean Opinion Score (MOS) rating test 4 Percep ble but not annoying. 3 Slightly annoying ✴Scores distributions across subjects is assumed to be.
See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.