ebook img

Multilateral aid 2010 PDF

212 Pages·2011·2.832 MB·English
by  OECD
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Multilateral aid 2010

2 0 0 8 D A C 2008 DAC Report on Multilateral Aid R e p Multilateral aid accounts for over a third of total ODA. The scale at which the multilateral o 2008 DAC Report r system is used reflects donors’ views of it as an important aid channel. However, a clearer t o picture of the multilateral system is needed to analyse this channel, and the first ever OECD n M Development Assistance Committee (DAC) report on multilateral aid aims to address this u on Multilateral Aid gap. The report provides a snapshot of the multilateral aid architecture, from the funding lt of multilateral organisations by DAC members to their own multilateral aid strategies and ila t e policies. The report also highlights issues such as fragmentation, multilateral effectiveness, r a reform processes and partner country views. l A id www.oecd.org/dac/scalingup 2008 DAC Report on Multilateral Aid DAC RepoRt on MultilAteRAl AiD, 2008 – © oeCD 2009 ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT the oeCD is a unique forum where the governments of 30 democracies work together to address the economic, social and environmental challenges of globalisation. the oeCD is also at the forefront of efforts to understand and to help governments respond to new developments and concerns, such as corporate governance, the information economy and the challenges of an ageing population. the organisation provides a setting where governments can compare policy experiences, seek answers to common problems, identify good practice and work to co-ordinate domestic and international policies. the oeCD member countries are: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, iceland, ireland, italy, Japan, Korea, luxembourg, Mexico, the netherlands, new Zealand, norway, poland, portugal, the Slovak Republic, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, turkey, the united Kingdom and the united States. the Commission of the european Communities takes part in the work of the oeCD. Publié en français sous le titre : Rapport 2008 du CAD sur l’aide multilatérale DAC RepoRt on MultilAteRAl AiD, 2008 – © oeCD 2009 tABle oF ContentS – 3 Table of Contents Acronyms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 Executive Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Chapter 1. Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Chapter 2 . Multilateral Aid at a Glance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Historical trends in multilateral aid............................................................ 21 Allocations to multilateral agencies ........................................................... 24 Gross disbursements and credit reflows........................................................ 26 total use of the multilateral system............................................................ 26 use of the multilateral system by non-DAC countries ............................................. 31 Chapter 3. Multilateral Aid Policies of DAC Donors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .34 Multilateral partners ....................................................................... 34 Multilateral strategies ...................................................................... 35 Managing multilateral assistance ............................................................. 41 DAC peer review and other national review recommendations for multilateral engagement ............... 42 Allocation and scaling up of multilateral aid .................................................... 43 Chapter 4. Bilateral and Multilateral Allocations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 Geographical distribution of oDA ............................................................ 47 Distribution of oDA by income of partner country ............................................... 49 Distribution of oDA by sector................................................................ 50 Multilateral aid to health and infrastructure..................................................... 51 Multilateral allocation systems ............................................................... 53 Chapter 5. International Organisations that Receive ODA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 proliferation of organisations ................................................................ 59 From the global to the tiny................................................................... 60 Agriculture, livestock and fisheries organisations ................................................ 60 Chapter 6. Multilateral Fragmentation and Opportunities for Better Division of Labour . . . . . . .65 Multilateral concentration and fragmentation at the global level..................................... 65 Multilateral concentration and fragmentation at partner country level ................................ 69 in-country division of labour ................................................................ 73 Reflections on division of labour among multilateral organisations .................................. 76 DAC RepoRt on MultilAteRAl AiD, 2008 – © oeCD 2009 4 – tABle oF ContentS Chapter 7. Multilateral Aid Effectiveness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78 paris Declaration – Are the multilaterals on track? ............................................... 78 Multilateral organisations performance Assessment network (MopAn) ............................. 82 internal performance monitoring in multilateral organisations...................................... 83 Common performance Assessment System (CoMpAS) ........................................... 84 iFAD report on development effectiveness...................................................... 85 Bilateral agency assessments of multilateral organisation effectiveness............................... 86 Further reflections on assessment tools ........................................................ 88 Chapter 8. Partner Country Views on Multilateral Organisations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .92 perceptions of multilateral performance........................................................ 92 Reflections on partner country views.......................................................... 94 Chapter 9. Reforms in the Multilateral System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .96 “Delivering as one”: united nations at the country level .......................................... 96 Reforming the Bretton Woods institutions11..........................................................................................100 Reforms in regional development banks....................................................... 102 external aid management reform in the european Commission .................................... 103 Reflections on multilateral reforms........................................................... 104 Appendix . DAC Donors’ Multilateral Aid: Trends and Policy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 Australia................................................................................ 108 Austria ..................................................................................113 Belgium .................................................................................117 Canada................................................................................. 121 Denmark ............................................................................... 125 european Commission......................................................................131 Finland................................................................................. 135 France.................................................................................. 139 Germany ................................................................................143 Greece ................................................................................. 148 ireland ................................................................................. 152 italy ................................................................................... 156 Japan .................................................................................. 159 luxembourg............................................................................. 164 netherlands ............................................................................. 168 new Zealand .............................................................................173 norway..................................................................................178 portugal ................................................................................ 182 Spain .................................................................................. 186 Sweden................................................................................. 192 Switzerland ............................................................................. 196 united Kingdom ......................................................................... 201 united States ............................................................................ 205 DAC RepoRt on MultilAteRAl AiD, 2008 – © oeCD 2009 tABle oF ContentS – 5 Boxes Box 2.1. Definitions and main categories of multilateral institutions ................................... 21 Box 2.2. DAC data collection from multilateral agencies............................................. 29 Box 3.1. ireland’s rationale for multilateral engagement.............................................. 35 Box 3.2. Sweden’s multilateral strategy .......................................................... 37 Box 3.3. Switzerland’s multilateral strategy ....................................................... 38 Box 3.4. ilo perspective...................................................................... 40 Box 3.5. Management of european Commission assistance........................................... 42 Box 3.6. DFiD performance funding ............................................................ 43 Box 3.7. uK and Spain – Scaling up aid to multilateral organisations................................... 45 Box 4.1. Multilateral development bank resource allocation systems ................................... 54 Box 4.2. united nations Development Assistance Framework (unDAF) ............................... 56 Box 6.1. Harmonisation and division of labour in uganda............................................ 73 Box 6.2. international principles of good practice on in-country division of labour........................ 74 Box 6.3. Development partnerships and division of labour in tanzania ................................. 75 Box 7.1. Multilateral organisations performance Assessment network (MopAn) approach to assessing the effectiveness of multilateral organisations................................................. 83 Box 7.2. professional peer reviews of the evaluation function in multilateral organisations.................. 84 Box 9.1. Joint donor mission to selected “Delivering as one” pilot countries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 Box 9.2. “Delivering as one” in Mozambique .................................................... 100 Figures Figure 0.1. Gross ODA by DAC member countries 1987-2006 ........................................ 12 Figure 0.2. Relationship between bilateral, non-core and core multilateral oDA in 2006 ................... 13 Figure 2.1. Gross oDA provided by DAC member countries 1987-2006................................. 22 Figure 2.2. DAC member countries’ multilateral oDA as share of total oDA 1987-2006 ................... 23 Figure 2.3. Multilateral oDA disbursements by DAC member countries 2004-06......................... 23 Figure 2.4. Multilateral oDA as share of total oDA by DAC member countries (excluding debt relief) ............................................................... 24 Figure 2.5. DAC member countries’ multilateral oDA (core contributions) to major agencies 1987-2006....... 25 Figure 2.6. oDA gross disbursements (core contributions) and reflows 1997-2006, cumulative (excluding debt relief) ............................................................... 27 Figure 2.7. non-core funding provided to multilaterals, 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 Figure 3.1. DAC member countries: Advantages of and priorities for engaging with multilateral agencies...... 34 Figure 4.1. Distribution of multilateral and bilateral aid by region 2006................................. 48 Figure 4.2. Distribution of bilateral and multilateral aid to fragile states 2006............................ 48 Figure 4.3. Multilateral non-core funding by region and fragile states 2006.............................. 49 Figure 4.4. Distribution of bilateral and multilateral aid to countries by income 2006...................... 50 Figure 4.5. Distribution of bilateral and multilateral aid by sector 2004-06 .............................. 50 Figure 4.6. Multilateral non-core funding by sector 2006 ............................................ 51 Figure 4.7. Multilateral aid to the health sector by country income and agency, 2004-06.................... 52 Figure 4.8. Multilateral aid for infrastructure and services 2004-06.................................... 52 Figure 5.1. Founding of international organisations by decade and sector................................ 60 Figure 6.1. Composition of gross multilateral oDA 2005 and 2006..................................... 66 Figure 6.2. number of multilateral agencies per country 2005-06 ..................................... 68 Figure 6.3. number of multilateral agencies collectively contributing less than 10% of a country’s aid, 2005-06 68 DAC RepoRt on MultilAteRAl AiD, 2008 – © oeCD 2009 6 – tABle oF ContentS Tables table 2.1. Core contributions provided by DAC member countries to the major multilateral agencies, 2004-06.. 25 table 2.2. non-core funds channelled through multilaterals: Creditor Reporting System and donor estimates .. 28 table 2.3. norway’s core contributions to multilateral agencies and aid channelled through multilaterals, 2006 ... 31 table 2.4. non-DAC donor oDA, 2004-06........................................................ 32 table 2.5. Korea: Core contributions to multilateral agencies and aid channelled through multilaterals . . . . . . . . 33 table 5.1. international agriculture, livestock and fisheries agencies receiving oDA....................... 62 table 6.1. Concentration of multilateral agencies, 2005-06 ........................................... 67 table 6.2. Country programmable aid by donor and partner country, 2005-06............................ 71 table 7.1. paris Declaration indicators and targets for multilateral donors ............................... 80 table 7.2. Responses of 54 partner countries to the 2008 monitoring survey of progress on the paris Declaration... 81 table 7.3. Multilateral progress 2006–08 on nine indicators .......................................... 82 DAC RepoRt on MultilAteRAl AiD, 2008 – © oeCD 2009 ACRonyMS – 7 Acronyms AAA Accra Agenda for Action AfDB African Development Bank AfDF African Development Fund AMCs Advance Market Commitments AsDB Asian Development Bank AsDF Asian Development Fund BADeA* Arab Bank for economic Development in Africa BMZ* Federal Ministry for economic Co-operation and Development (Germany) CABei Central American Bank of economic integration CarDB Caribbean Development Bank CeB Chief executives Board for Coordination (un) CGiAR Consultative Group on international Agricultural Research CiDA Canadian international Development Agency CpA Country programmable Aid CpiA Country policy and institutional Assessment CRS Creditor Reporting System (oeCD) DAC Development Assistance Committee (oeCD) Danida Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark DFiD Department for international Development (uK) DG Directorate General DoCo Development operations Coordination office (un) Dol Division of labour DpG Development partners Group (tanzania) eBRD european Bank for Reconstruction and Development eC european Commission eCHo european Commission's Humanitarian Aid office eCoSoC economic and Social Council (united nations) eCoWAS economic Community of West African States eDF european Development Fund eu european union DAC RepoRt on MultilAteRAl AiD, 2008 – © oeCD 2009 8 – ACRonyMS GAVi Global Alliance for Vaccines and immunization GeF the Global environment Facility Gni Gross national income HipC Heavily indebted poor Country (World Bank initiative) iAti international Aid transparency initiative iBRD international Bank for Reconstruction and Development iCpD international Conference for population and Development iCRC international Committee of the Red Cross iDA international Development Association iDB inter-American Development Bank iDB Sp.Fund inter-American Development Fund for Special operations iDCD inter-Departmental Committee on Development (ireland) iFAD international Fund for Agricultural Development iFFim international Finance Facility for immunisation iFis international Financial institutions ilo international labour organization iMF international Monetary Fund iMF-pRGF international Monetary Fund – poverty Reduction and Growth Facility trust ioM international organization for Migration JMAp Joint Management Action plan (Bretton Woods institutions) lDC least Developed Country lHi legal Harmonisation initiative liC low-income Country MDBs Multilateral Development Banks MDGs Millennium Development Goals MDRi Multilateral Debt Relief initiative MeFF Multilateral effectiveness Framework MfDR Managing for Development Results MiGA Multilateral investment Guarantee Agency MopAn Multilateral organisations performance Assessment network nepAD new partnership for Africa’s Development oCHA office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (un) oDA official Development Assistance oDi overseas Development institute (uK) oeCD organisation for economic Co-operation and Development oei organización de estados iberoamericanos oHCHR office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights opeC organization of the petroleum exporting Countries oSCe organization for Security and Cooperation in europe pAF performance Assessment Framework pBA performance Based Allocation pius project implementation units DAC RepoRt on MultilAteRAl AiD, 2008 – © oeCD 2009 ACRonyMS – 9 pMF performance Management Framework RBM Results Based Management RBSA Regular Budget Supplementary Account RC Resident Coordinator SDC Swiss Agency for Development and Co-operation SeCAB Secretaría ejecutiva del Convenio Andrés Bello SeCo State Secretariat of economic Affairs (Switzerland) SWAp Sector-Wide Approach tCpR triennial Comprehensive policy Review the Global Fund the Global Fund to Fight AiDS, tuberculosis and Malaria un united nations unAiDS Joint un programme on HiV/AiDS unCt un Country team unDAF un Development Assistance Framework unDG un Development Group unDp un Development programme unDpKo un Department of peacekeeping operations unep un environment programme unFpA un population Fund unHCR office of the un High Commissioner for Refugees uniCeF un Children’s Fund uniDo un industrial Development organisation uniFeM un Development Fund for Women unoDC un office for Drugs and Crime unRWA un Relief and Works Agency for palestine Refugees in the near east untA un Regular programme of technical Assistance WADB West African Development Bank WFp World Food programme WHo World Health organization * Acronym in original language. DAC RepoRt on MultilAteRAl AiD, 2008 – © oeCD 2009

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.