OXFORD POLITICAL THEORY Oxford Political Theory presents the best new work in contemporary political theory. It is intended to be broad in scope, including original contributions to political philosophy, and also work in applied political theory. The series will contain works of outstanding quality with no restric tion as to approach or subject matter. OTHER TITLES IN THIS SERIES Justice as Impartiality Brian Barry Real Freedom for All: What (if Anything) Can Justify Capitalism? Philippe Van Parijs Justificatory Liberalism: An Essay on Metaphysics and Political Theory Gerald Gaus The Politics of Presence Anne Phillips On Nationality David Miller M U L T I C U L T U R AL C I T I Z E N S H IP A LIBERAL THEORY OF MINORITY RIGHTS WILL KYMLICKA CLARENDON PRESS • OXFORD OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS Great Clarendon Street, Oxford ox2 6DP Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide in Oxford New York Auckland Bangkok Buenos Aires Cape Town Chennai Dar es Salaam Delhi Hong Kong Istanbul Karachi Kolkata Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Mumbai Nairobi • Sao Paulo Shanghai Tokyo Toronto Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries Published in the United States by Oxford University Press Inc., New York © Will Kymlicka 1995 The moral rights of the author have been asserted Database right Oxford University Press (maker) First published 1995 First issued in paperback 1996 Reprinted in paperback 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2003 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above. You must not circulate this book in any other binding or cover and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Data available Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Kymlicka, Will. Multicultural citizenship : a liberal theory of minority right / Will Kiymlicka. (Oxford political theory) Includes bibliographical references. 1. Minorities—Civil rights. 2. Ethnic groups—Civil rights. 3. Liberalism. 4. Multiculturalism. I. Title. II. Series. JF1061.K96 1995 323.1—dc20 95-5110 ISBN 0-19-827949-3 ISBN 0-19-829091-8 (pbk.) 9 10 8 Printed in Great Britain on acid-free paper by Biddies Ltd www. biddies, co. uk ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS MY greatest debt, as always, is to Susan Donaldson. Virtually every thing I write is first read by Sue, and every idea in this book has been shaped by our discussions. When Novalis said 'It is certain any con viction gains infinitely the moment another soul will believe in it,' he could have been talking about my reliance on Sue's advice and opinions. Over the last few years, as this book has taken shape, I have been moving back and forth between academic and government employ ment, both of which I enjoy in small doses. My ability to maintain this peripatetic lifestyle has depended on the support of a wide range of people and institutions, including Peter Heap and Leslie Seidle at the Institute for Research on Public Policy, Greg Gauld at Multiculturalism and Citizenship Canada, Barry Hoffmaster at the Westminster Institute for Ethics, Judith Nolte at the Royal Commission on New Reproductive Technologies, John Leyden at Carleton University, and Hilliard Aronovitch at the University of Ottawa. I am grateful to each for the interesting work they have sent my way, and for sparing me from the work I wished to avoid. I would also like to thank the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada for funding. My affiliation with the University of Ottawa has been loose, but none the less very rewarding. As a bilingual university with a mandate to serve both . the anglophone and francophone communities in Canada, it is ideally suited for research on minority rights. I would like to thank Wayne Norman and Donald Lenihan, my colleagues in the philosophy department, for many hours of discussion on these topics. I owe a special debt to Wayne, who has provided thorough comments on this book. Chapter 9 is based on some work we co- authored. I also learned a great deal from the students in a graduate seminar I taught at the University in the spring of 1994, who cheer fully pointed out many problems with an earlier draft of this book. I would also like to thank Brian Anderson, Lise Charlebois, and Patricia Ivan for excellent research assistance; Beverley Slopen, Dominic Byatt, and Tim Barton for smoothing the publishing process; and many, many friends and colleagues for their comments, discus sions, and papers, including Roberto Alejandro, Michael Asch, Judith Baker, Daniel Bell, Allen Buchanan, Alan Cairns, Joseph Carens, vi Acknowledgements G. A. Cohen, Raphael Cohen-Almagor, David Dyzenhaus, Avigail Eisenberg, Leslie Green, Amy Gutmann, Moshe Halbertal, Robert Howse, Tom Hurka, Jane Jenson, Dave Knott, Chandran Kukathas, Guy Laforest, Brian Langille, Jacob Levy, Dominique Leydet, Michael McDonald, Stephen Macedo, Patrick Macklem, Colin Macleod, Andrew Mason, David Miller, Tariq Modood, Margaret Moore, Glyn Morgan, James Nickel, Susan Moller Okin, Michael Oliver, Tom Palmer, Bhikhu Parekh, Filimon Peonidis, Anne Phillips, Robert Post, Kurt Priensberg, Maurice Rickard, Arthur Ripstein, John Russell, Alan Ryan, Sibyl Schwarzenbach, Michel Seymour, Michael Smith, Andrew Stark, John Tomasi, Mark Tunick, Mary Ellen Turpel, Jeremy Waldron, Peter G. White, Melissa Williams, and Iris Marion Young. I would like to give special thanks to my parents. They have always supported my work, and have taken a particular interest in this pro ject, which touches closely on their own lives. Finally, I would like to thank Codie and Luke. Like most dogs, they are baffled, and sometimes exasperated, by the amount of time humans spend poring over the printed word. But they kept me com pany on some long nights, and I am grateful for that. Many of the arguments in this book have been worked out in a series of papers I have written over the last few years, although most have been extensively rewritten: 'Three Forms of Group-Differentiated Citizenship in Canada', in Seyla Benhabib (ed.), Democracy and Difference: Changing Boundaries of the Political (Princeton University Press, forthcoming) (Chapter 2); 'Individual and Community Rights', in Judith Baker (ed.), Group Rights (University of Toronto Press, 1994) (Chapter 3); 'Liberalism and the Politicization of Ethnicity', Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, 4/2 (1991) (Chapter 4); 'Dworkin on Freedom and Culture', in J. Burley (ed.), Reading Dworkin (Basil Blackwell, forthcoming) (Chapter 5); 'Group Representation in Canadian Polities', in L. Seidle (ed.), Equity and Community: The Charter, Interest Advocacy, and Representation (Institute for Research on Public Policy, 1993) (Chapter 7); 'Two Models of Pluralism and Tolerance', Analyse und Kritik, 14/1 (1992) and 'The Rights of Minority Cultures: Reply to Kukathas', Political Theory, 20/1 (1992) (Chapter 8); Recent Work in Citizenship Theory (Department of Multiculturalism and Citizenship, Government of Canada, 1992), and 'Return of the Citizen', Ethics, 104/2 (1994) (with W. J. Norman) (Chapter 9). Acknowledgements vii A Note on the Jacket Illustration The jacket illustration is a painting called 'The Peaceable Kingdom', by Edward Hicks, painted around 1834. It illustrates the signing of a treaty in 1682 between a group of Quakers and three local Indian tribes, the Leeni Lenape, Susquehannock, and Shawnee, allowing for the establishment of a Quaker community in Pennsylvania. (The Quakers were one of the few groups to honour their treaty commitments.) Hicks, a devout Quaker, viewed this treaty as the beginning of the 'peaceable kingdom' prophesied in Isaiah, in which love will replace hostility and competition both amongst humans and in the natural world (e.g. 'the lion will lie down with the lamb'). I chose this painting because it portrays and celebrates a form of multicul- turalism that we often ignore. Most discussions of 'multiculturalism', at least in North America, focus on the case of immigrants, and the accommodation of their ethnic and racial differences within the larger society. Less attention has been paid to the situation of indigenous peoples and other non immigrant 'national minorities' whose homeland has been incorporated into the boundaries of a larger state, through conquest, colonization, or federa tion. Treaties are a common means of regulating the interaction between dominant groups and national minorities. They reflect the idea that the two nations in a multination state treat each other as equals, and respect each other's right to speak for and govern themselves. Many people view such treaties as outmoded or irrelevant, and they have generally been ignored or violated by the majority whenever they were inconvenient. However, I think the underlying ideal is worth studying, and celebrating, and may indeed be vital to creating a more peaceable kingdom in the modern world. CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. THE POLITICS OF MULTICULTURAL ISM 10 3. INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND COLLECTIVE RIGHTS 34 4. RETHINKING THE LIBERAL TRADITION 49 5. FREEDOM AND CULTURE 75 6. JUSTICE AND MINORITY RIGHTS 107 7. ENSURING A VOICE FOR MINORITIES 131 8. TOLERATION AND ITS LIMITS 152 9. THE TIES THAT BIND 173 10. CONCLUSION 193 Notes 196 Bibliography 240 Index 265