Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society, 101 (3), Sep-Dec 2004 392-398 MORTALITY OF HERPETOFAUNA, BIRDS AND MAMMALS DUE TO VEHICULAR TRAFFIC IN ETAWAH DISTRICT, UTTAR PRADESH, INDIA 1 K.S. GOPI SUNDAR2 'Accepted February 2003 2Wildlife Institute ofIndia, PB 18, Chandrabani, Dehra Dun 248 001, Uttaranchal, India. Present Address: Indian Cranes and Wetlands Working Group, C/o International Crane Foundation, E-11376, Shady Lane Road, Baraboo, WI-53913, USA and C/o Wildlife Protection Society of India, M-52, Greater Kailash Part-1, New Delhi 110 048, India. Email: [email protected] Roadkillsofherpetofauna,birdsandmammalswereenumeratedalonga20kmstretchofroadinEtawahdistrict,Uttar Pradesh, in an agriculturedominated area.Atotal of133 killsof33 speciesofanimalswere recorded overtwoyears. Amphibians and birds were killed significantly, more during the monsoon, while reptiles and mammals were killed almost equally across seasons. The species killed the most were the Marbled Toad Bufo stomaticus (amphibia), FlapshellTurtleLissemyspunctata(reptile), HouseCrowCorvussplendens(bird)anddomesticDogCamsfamiliaris (mammal). Whenallspeciespresentalongtheroadforthetaxawereconsidered, birdspecieswereleastrepresentedin roadkills(16%), andhigherproportionsofspecieswerekilled intheothertaxa(25-30%).Amphibiansand birdswere killed significantly more in the monsoon, while season did notaffect numbers ofkillsfor herpetofaunaormammals. Mediumsizedbirdsandomnivorebirdspecieswerekilledthemost.Accountingforall birdspeciespresent,numberof birdsofdifferentsizeskilledwas inproportiontothatpresentalongtheroad. Whenguildswereconsidered,omnivore specieswerekilled inmuchhigherproportiontotheiravailabilityalongtheroad.Notaxaofconservationconcernwas killed bytraffic duringthis study. No speciesortaxawaskilledto an extentthat would endangerthe species, though specific studies on species most vulnerable to vehicular traffic will be useful to determine how to prevent such mortalities. Keywords:Frequencyofroadkills,herpetofauna,birds,mammals,Bufostomaticus Lissemyspunctata Corvussplendens , , , Canisfamiliaris INTRODUCTION withspecialreferencetoeffectofhabitatonpatternsofroadkill (Vijayakumaretal.2001),andseasononselectfauna(Kumara Roads have been known to cause ecological effects etal. 2000). Fewstudieshaveexploredcommunitystructure like fragmentation, habitat loss due to deforestation, affect ofvulnerabletaxaalongroads inanagricultural landscape in animal movement, cause changes in animal behaviour, and an effort to understand the potential species that may be cause mortality due to accidents with vehicular traffic (van affected by vehicular traffic (Dhindsa et al. 1988). Most of derZandtelal. 1980;Fahrige/a/. 1995;Goosem 1997; Forman these studies have concentrated on mammals and andAlexander 1998;TrombulakandFrisswell2000;Develey herpetofauna, and reports on bird mortality due to vehicular and Stouffer2001; Serranoeta/. 2002). Vehicleson roadsare traffic are few (Dhindsa etal. 1988, Sharma 1988). None of thought to have overtaken hunting as the leading direct these studies have information on the proportion ofspecies human causeofvertebrate mortality (FormanandAlexander inanareaaffectedbyvehiculartraffic. Istudiedsomeaspects 1998), often endangering local populations ofcommon and offaunalmortalitiesduetovehiculartrafficinEtawahdistrict, threatened species (Clarke et al. 1998; Hodar et al. 2000; Uttar Pradesh, in north central India. The study investigated HuijserandBergers2000). In 1994, Indiahad3 millionkmof the following questions. road,ofwhich 50%weresurfaced(Rajvanshietal. 2001). In 1. What species ofherpetofauna, birds and mammals are Uttar Pradesh alone, atotal length of 1,21,761 km had been mostaffected by vehiculartraffic andwhat proportion addedin 1998-99(Anon2001). Thedirectorindirectimpactof ofspecies present are represented in roadkills? these roadson wild faunahas received very littleattention in 2. Isfaunalmortalityduetovehiculartrafficsimilaracross the country. seasons? There is general awareness of the prevalence of 3. Are all avian groups present along the road (species, mortality due to vehiculartraffic offree-ranging vertebrates families,sizes,guilds)affectedequallybyvehiculartraffic? in India,andreportsofsuchmortalityare increasing(Dhindsa etal. 1988, Sharma 1988, Gokula 1997, Kumaraetal. 2000, STUDY AREA Rajvanshietal. 2001,Vijayakumareial.2001).Thesestudies haveeitherlistedkills(Sharma 1988,Gokula 1997, Rajvanshi The study wascarried outalongthemain road starting etal.2001),oraddressedconcernstofaunainprotectedareas at Etawah town (26° 48' 51" N, 78° 59' 32" E) and endingat VERTEBRATE MORTALITY DUE TO VEHICULAR TRAFFIC Saiphaitown(26°57'51"N,78°57'52"E),onastretchofroad nighttime sampling. Effort was more or less constant over measuring 20 km. The road was metalled, a two-way traffic months and years. Everyanimal found killed due to vehicles route with equal width throughout, and was busy since it was identified to the level possible and removed to avoid wastheonlyconnectingroad between Etawah and Mainpuri repetition. Most kills recorded were fresh with the complete towns. Most ofthe heavy traffic was at night when buses animal available for identification. Onlytwice, kills ofbirds plying northwards and trucks carrying cargo used the route. were ascertained from feathers left over by scavengers. To Daytimetrafficcomprisedprincipallyoftractors,smallerfour- determine the number of species present along the road, wheelers (cars, jeeps), and two-wheelers (scooters, opportunistic observations were maintained and all animals motorbikes, mopeds). Speeds ofthe vehicleswere as high as were identified to the species level. Formammals, bats were 1 10 kmph for four-wheelers, while two-wheelers reached not considered. This enumeration is likely to be a minimum speeds of70 kmph. Three counts ofvehicles, one each in since many nocturnal species could have been missed. For summer,monsoonandwinter,between0730-0845 hrsin2000 birds, all species were classified into five size classes (very showedthatan average of56 vehicles ply every houron the small,small,medium,large,verylarge),andgroupedintoeight roadwithnosignificantdifferenceinnumberofvehiclesacross feeding guilds (aquatic, carnivore, frugivore, granivore, seasons(x2 =l-52,p>0.09). insectivore,nectarivore, omnivore, and scavenger, asperAli 2 Both sides of the road were bordered almost andRipley 1989),andnotediftheycrossedtheroad. Statistical continuously with dry scrub and trees, behind which were analyses were restricted to ascertaining iffrequency ofkills crop fields, groveswith fruittrees or habitation. Majortrees ofindividualtaxaweredifferentacrossseasonsusingx2tests. along the road were Da/bergia sissoo. Ficus benghalensis, Comparisonsacrosstaxawerenotcarriedoutsincedifferences Syzygium cumini Mangifera indica and Psidium gujava, in removal rates of different sized animals, differential , , and the predominant shrubs were Prosopisjuliflora and mortalities during day and night, and seasonal and species Ipomoea aquata with Saccharum sp. grass growing in few differences in densities ofthe various taxa were unknown places. In addition, six village ponds ofvarying sizes, eight and not controlled for. Bias due to the unaccounted animals small (<10 ha) grassy marshlands, one alkaline wasteland, which may have been struck by vehicles, but crawled away nine small towns (<ten houses each) and nine large towns has not been corrected. It is known that speeds ofvehicles, (>ten houses each) bordered this stretch, and one small river intensity oftraffic, the kind of vehicles, width ofthe road, and two canals intersected it. Only three village ponds were habitat conditions etc. also affect mortality (Dhindsa et al. perennial dueto disposal ofsewage intothem, whilethe rest 1988,Goosem 1997,Finderetal. 1999,Clevengeretal.2003); were full only during and immediately after the monsoon, these biases have also not been investigated or controlled drying up in January/February. The region was thus suitable for during this study. foravariety offauna. Three principal seasons could be differentiated based RESULTS onrainfallandtemperatureregimesnamely,winter(November- February),summer/pre-monsoon(March-June)andmonsoon Frequencyofroadkills (July-October). The main crops beside the stretch of road The road was monitored for226 and 230 days in 2000 were barley, fruits, and paddy during May-November, and and2001 respectively,coveringatotalof9,120km.Atotalof wheat and vegetables during November-April. In late June 21 amphibians(threespecies,twofamilies,rateofkill:0.0023/ and early July, most fields were fallow until the rains. The km),34reptiles(sixspecies,fourfamilies,rateofkill: 0.0037/ main source of precipitation was the southwest monsoon km),46birds(17species, 12 families,rateofkill: 0.005/km), with an annual average of 851 mm (1990-2002, District and32mammals(sevenspecies,fourfamilies,0.0035/km)were Collector’sOffice,personalcommunication), andfog/dewin recorded as roadkills (Table 1). Family Bufonidae was winter. Temperaturesvariedbetween 1 °C inwinterto>45 °C represented the most in amphibian kills (13/21), with the insummer. Marbled Toad Bufostomaticus being killed most frequently (9/21).Amongreptiles,the FlapshellTurtleLissemyspunctata METHODS waskilledthemost(10/34)andequal numbersofthefamilies BoidaeandColubridaewerekilled(9/34each).Amongbirds, Road killswere recorded fortwoyearsduringJanuary speciesfromfourfamilies,Corvidae, Stumidae,Ardeidaeand a20w0e0e-kDbeectewmebeenr02600001-.1T0h0e0rhorasdewaacshpsaatmropllliendgodnaeytodrsiixvitnigmeast HRaolulsiedaCe,rowewrCeorkivlulsedspthleenmdoesnts((n6=96%)oafnd46caktitllles,egTraebtlBeub1i).dTchues 20-35 kmph. Presenceofhighwaymenpreventedeveningand ibis(n=5)werekilledmostfrequently.InthefamilySturnidae, J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc., 101 (3), Sep-Dec 2004 393 VERTEBRATE MORTALITY DUE TO VEHICULARTRAFFIC Table 1 Frequencies of roadkills of herpetofauna, birds and mammals in Etawah, Uttar Pradesh, India (January 2000 to December2001) SI. Taxa No of SI. Taxa No of No. individuals No individuals (% of total) (% of total) Amphibians Birds 1. Family Bufonidae 13 (61.91) 1. Family Picidae 1 (02.17) 1 Bufo melanostictus 4 (19.05) 1. Dinopium benghalense 1 (02.17) 2 B stomaticus 9 (42.86) II. Family Upupidae 1 (02.17) II. Family Ranidae 8 (28.57) 2. Upupa epops 1 (02 17) 3. Hoplobatrachus tigerinus 3 (14.29) III. Family Coraciidae 3 (06.52) Unidentified ranids 3 (14 29) 3. Coracais benghalensis 3 (06 52) III. Unidentified frogs 2 (09.52) IV. Family Centropodidae 3 (06.52) Total 21 4 Centropus sinensis 3 (06.52) V. Family Psittacidae 2 (04.35) Reptiles 5. Psittacula krameri 2 (04.35) 1. Family Boidae 9 (26.47) VI. Family Rallidae 5 (10.90) 1. Eryx johnii 9 (26.47) 6 Amaurornis phoenicurus 5 (10 90) II. Family Colubridae 9 (26.47) VII. Family Ardeidae 7 (15.20) 2. Xenochrophis piscator 3 (08.82) 7. Bubulcus ibis 5 (10 90) 3. Oligodon sp 1 (02.94) 8 Ardeola grayii 2 (04 35) 4 Ptyas mucosa 5 (14.71) VIII. Family Corvidae 10 (21.80) III. Family Agamidae 1 (02.94) 9 Corvus splendens 6 (1304) 5. Calotes versicolor 1 (02.94) 10.C. macrorhynchos 4 (08 70) IV. Family Testudidae 10 (29.41) IX. Family Sturnidae 9 (19.60) 6. Lissemys punctata 10 (2941) 11 Sturnus pagadorum 1 (02.17) V. Unidentified reptiles 5 (14.71) 12.S. contra 3 (06.52) Total 34 tZ.Acridotheres tristis 4 (09.70) 14 A. gingianus 1 (02 20) Mammals X. Family Cisticoliidae 2 (04.35) 1. Family Canidae 23 (71.88) 15 Prinia inornata 2 (04.35) 1 Canis familiaris 19 (59.38) XI. Family Sylvidae 1 (02.17) 2. C aureus 3 (09.38) 16 Turdoides malcolmi 1 (02.17) 3. Vulpes benghalensis 1 (03.13) XII. Family Passeridae 2 (04.35) II. Family Felidae 5 (15.63) 17.Passer domesticus 2 (04.35) 4 Felis chaus 1 (03 13) Total 26 5. Domesticcat 4 (12.50) III. Family Herpestidae 3 (09.38) 6 Herpestes javanicus 3 (09 38) Total kills 133 IV. Family Sciuridae 1 (03.13) 7 Funambulus palmarum 1 (03.13) Total 32 all four species present in the area were represented in kills. beingkilled(16%),theothertaxawereverysimilarintermsof Amongmammals, the Family Canidaewasrepresented most proportionofspeciesrepresented inroadkills(25-30%,Table in roadkills (23/32), with Dogs Canisfamiliaris beingkilled 2). Of the species present along the road, all species of themost(19/32).Amongwild species.JackalsC. aureusand small Indian Mongoose Herpestesjavanicus were killed the Table 2 Species richness of herpetofauna, birds and mammals found along the road and as roadkills in Etawah, Uttar Pradesh, most (3/32 each), and one kill each was recorded ofthe Fox India (January 2000-December 2001) Vulpesbenghalensis JungleCatFelischausandPalmSquirrel , Funambuluspalmarum(Table 1). Taxa Number present Numberseen in roadkills Species richness along the road was the lowest for (proportion of total) herpetofaunaandthehighestforbirds(Table2).Atthefamily level,therepresentation inroadkillsvariedwidelyacrosstaxa Families Species Families Species with most ofthe amphibian families present beingkilled and Amphibians 3 10 2 (67) 3 (30) veryfewofthemammal familiespresentbeingrepresented in Reptiles 10 24 4 (40) 6 (25) roadkills(Table2).Atthespecies level, except forbirdsthat Birds 40 104 12 (30) 17 (164) hadaverysmal proportion ofspecies presentalongtheroad Mammals 15 24 4 (29) 7 (27) I 394 J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc.( 101 (3), Sep-Dec 2004 ) VERTEBRATE MORTALITY DUE TO VEHICULAR TRAFFIC Available BRoadkill Available BRoadkill I verysmall small medium large v.large Fig 1: Effectofbodysizeonvulnerabilityofbirdstotrafficin Fig. 2: Representationofguildsofbirdsalongtheroadandin Etawah, UttarPradesh, India roadkillsinEtawah, UttarPradesh, India amphibiansandmammalswereseentocrosstheroadat least (76.5%, Fig. 1). Very small and medium sized birds were once.Amongthereptiles, 16 ofthe 27 speciesseen alongthe represented in roadkills in nearly the same proportions as road(66.6%)wereseentocrosstheroadat leastonceandfor thosepresentalongtheroad,while small and very largebirds birds,89ofthe 104specieslistedalongtheroad(85.6%)were werenotkilled(Fig. 1). Mostkillswereofomnivore(35.3%), seen to cross the road at least once at a height that would insectivore (23.5%), and aquatic species (17.7%, Fig. 2). render them vulnerable to be killed by vehicles. All species Omnivore species were killed in far higher proportion than represented inroadkillswere fromthis list. presentalongthe road, while insectivore and aquatic species werekilled in lesserproportions(Fig.2). Toexamineeffectof Effectofseasonoffrequencyofroadkill size and guild on vulnerability ofbirds to vehicular traffic, There was no significant inter-annual difference in the sample sizes obtained were too small to carry out statistical rateofkills, ornumberofspecieskilled foranytaxa(x2 test, analyses. , p>0.1 inallcases)andkillswerepooledseasonally. Sufficient data for seasonal analyses each year was available only for DISCUSSION birds.Amphibianswerekilleddisproportionatelymore inthe monsoon(x2,=14,p<0.001,Table3)whilereptilesandmammals Herpetofauna were killed in nearly equal numbers in all seasons (x2 tests, Veryfewkillsofamphibianswereobtainedandmostof p>0.1). While birds were killed in nearly equal proportions them were during the monsoon. However, these animals are acrossseasonsin2000(x22=5.33,p>0.05),asignificantlyhigh small and carcasses on roads do not probably last very long number were killed during the monsoon in 2001 (x2 =16.7, on the road, and the estimates obtained during this study p<0.001). Forthepooled information,significantlymorebirds must be taken to be aminimum. An increase in mobility and werekilledduringthemonsoon(x2 =l8.57,p<0.005).Theleast activity ofamphibians due to rains leads to their increased kills foramphibians, reptiles and mammals were in summer, mortality due to vehicular traffic (Vijayakumar et al. 2001). whilebirdswerekilledthe leastduringwinter(Table3). Vijayakumar et al. (2001) recorded much higher rates of roadkillsforbothamphibians(2/km)andreptiles(0.4/km)than Effectofsizeandguildon frequencyofroadkillsofbirds thisstudy, butthesewereobtained fromaforestedarea.There All the bird species represented in road-kills were are no studies on roadkills of herpetofauna in the country resident and diurnal. Most birds killed were ofmedium size from non-forested on non-protected areas to compare the results ofthe present study. Traffic does not seem to be a herTpaebtolfeau3n:a,SebaisrodnsaalndeffmeactmmoanlfsreiqnuEetnacwyaho,f rUotatdakrilPlrsaodfesh majorconcernforamphibiansinEtawah. InMudumalai,Gokula (January 2000-December 2001) (1997) found more kills of snakes during the daytime as compared to evenings and nights. Vijayakumar et al. (2001 Numberkilled found no influence ofrain on mortality rates ofreptiles, as Taxa Summer Monsoon Winter was recorded by this study. Kumara et al. (2000), however, found a significant positive relationship between the rainy Amphibians 2 15 4 Reptiles 11 7 16 season and number of reptiles killed, particularly uropeltid Birds 10 29 7 snakes. When uropeltids were considered separately, other Mammals 8 12 12 snakes showed no relationship between mortality rates and J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc., 101 (3), Sep-Dec 2004 395 VERTEBRATE MORTALITY DUETO VEHICULAR TRAFFIC rainfall, similar to that found in Etawah. Many species of duringthefruitingseasonandresulted inthedeathsofmynas reptilesthatarestrictlyarboreal such asthegeckosandthose andcrowsforagingonfallen fruits. Crowswerefurtherkilled restrictedentirelytocanalsandriverssuchasthehard-shelled whentheywerescavengingroadkills.Theonlyrailidrepresented turtleswere found alongtheroad butwerenotrepresented in inkills,theWhite-breastedWaterhenAmauromisphoenicurus, roadkilIs. Monitor lizards Varanus benghalensis and wasfound living inroadsideponds. Killscouldhave occurred V.Jlavescens were seen killed in other roads in the area, but eitherduringforagingevents orduringterritorial fights with not represented on the study road. conspecifics.Theauthornearlyranoverone individualwhich Amphibians are clearly more susceptible to mortality was engrossed in an aggressive interaction with anotherbird byvehiculartrafficduringtherainsdueto increasedactivity, in the middle ofthe road, and when the motorbike was near most likelyrelatedtobreeding. However,mostreptileskilled them, broke away quite unpredictably and ran towards the in Etawah were inthe winter. The dark surfaces ofthe roads motorbike. Several passerines were also seen to engage in usually retained heat much later than the soil possibly territorial disputes, an activity that would make them more attracting reptiles. Kills of B stomaticus E. johnii and vulnerable to approaching traffic. The Greater Coucal , L. punctata were very high and specific studies on these Centropussinensis was seen to be a nest predator and often species may be worthwhile to ascertain exact causes and carried away eggs and nestlings from nests alongside the reduce or even prevent such high mortalities. road. One kill each was recorded in May, September and November ofthis species. Many species ofbirds were seen Birds nesting along the road during these months. This study suggests that mortality due to vehicular The Lesser Golden-backed Woodpecker Dinopium traffic affects only a small proportion ofspecies in an area, benghalense and Rose-ringed Parakeet Psittacula krameri medium-sized birds are affected the most, omnivore and usually foragedontreetrunksand inthecanopyrespectively insectivore species are more vulnerable than species and were correspondingly under represented in road kills. belonging to other guilds, and most kills occur during the The sole D. benghalense killed during the study was found monsoon. It appears that vehicular traffic causes minimal nearthe entrance ofatermite colony from which alates were mortalitiesofbirds,and isunlikelytobeamatterforconcern. emerging. The bird had flown down to feed on the alates Numbersofbirdsofeachspeciesweremuch lowerinroadkilIs fleeingthecolony, aswasconfirmed byitsstomachcontents. compared to actual numbers alongthe road. Majority ofthe P kramerideathsoccurredwhen flockswerechasedofffrom species present crossed the road implying that the road is adjoining fieldswhile they were depredatingcrops. The two notperceivedasabarrierbymostbirdspeciesandthatalmost parakeets found killed had large quantities ofwheat in their all the birds are vulnerable to vehicular traffic. The rate of stomachs. Occasionally, individuals were seen foraging on roadkills of birds recorded in this study, however, was far fallen fruit ofF. benghalensis and P gujcn>a on the road and lesserthanthatrecordedforasimilarhabitattype inRajasthan, this may lead to deaths occasionally. Ardeids take a longer about200 kmwestofthe studysite. Sharma(1988) recorded timeto attain heightwhen theytake offas comparedto other atotalof219killsof26speciesof19familiesinoneyearina bird species. After taking off from marshlands and ponds stretchoffivekmofroad. HefoundthattheEurasianCollared adjoiningtheroad,theytendedtofly lowovertheroadmaking DoveStreptopeliadecaoctawaskilledthemost in Rajasthan them susceptible to speeding traffic. Though White-necked butwasneverrepresentedinroadkillsinEtawah. InRajasthan, Storks Ciconia episcopus and Sarus Crane Grits antigone aquaticbirdswerekilledthe least,butthegloballythreatened nested along the road on trees and wetlands respectively, sarus crane Grits antigonewas represented in kills. The rate these large waterbirds were not killed by traffic during the of roadkills was 0.12 kills/km (calculated from the study study period. Food on roads and specific behaviour (e.g. assuming that sampling was carried out for 365 days), 24 territoriality) atcertaintimesseem to be responsible forkills times higherthan that recorded duringthis study. There was, ofbirds on roads. Additional species that were found killed however, no information on the species composition ofthe due to traffic on other roads near the study road but not birdcommunityalongtheroad. Thebirdcommunitystructure represented in this studywerethe White-throated Kingfisher islikelytobesimilarwithEtawah,and itisinterestingthatdifferent Halcyonsmyrnensis, Streptopeliadecaocto, Grits antigone , results were recorded. Vegetation structure, traffic intensity, and and Red-vented Bulbul Pycnonotus cafer. other factors such as fallen grain on the road etc. may have contributedtothedifferences inpatternsofroadkills. Mammals InEtawah, presenceoffewfruitingtreesalongtheroad Ofthe seven species ofmammals found killed in the caused largeamountsofripe fruitstobeavailableontheroad study, none were of conservation concern. One species. 396 1 Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc., 101 (3), Sep Dec 2004 1 VERTEBRATE MORTALITY DUE TOVEHICULAR TRAFFIC F.palmarum,wasarborealandtherestweregrounddwelling. studies away from protected and forested areas are required BoththeFox andtheJungleCatwerekilledduringthenight. to ascertain the actual magnitude ofroadkills in relation to The other nocturnal animals that were seen along the road populations of particular species. Studies elsewhere have weretheStriped HyaenaHyaenahyaena,CommonPalmCivet documented that roads perform as physical barriers to Paradoxus hermophroditus and Indian Pangolin Manis movements of animals often changing their behaviour , crassicaudatabutwere notkilled bytraffic duringthe study. (Daveley and Stouffer 2001), and that animal densities are These animals were sighted in the early morning. One Pale affected bythe presenceofroads(Fahrigetal. 1995, van der HedgehogParaechinusmicropuswas foundkilled bytraffic Zandeetal. 1980). Theoverall disturbanceeffectofroadson after the completion of the study. Previous accounts of wildlifewouldthereforebeunderrepresentedbyroadkillsand roadkills on mammals in India have been restricted to animals are possibly affected much more by other effects of protected and forested areas and have documented deaths roads such as habitat fragmentation, stress due to noise of ofmanyspeciesofconservationconcern(Kumaraetal.2000, trafficetc.(vanderZandeetal. 1980,Goosem 1997,Formanand Rajvanshietal.2001). Kumaraetal.(2000)foundnoinfluence Alexander 1998). Consideringthatthe GovernmentofIndia is of either habitat type or season on rates of mortality of undertakingseveral large-scaleexpansionsoftheroadnetwork mammals in a protected area, quite similar to the patterns in Uttar Pradesh and in the rest ofthe country, many more observed in Etawah. Mammals had relatively low mortality studies are required before we can hope to better understand rates in summer. The region along the road was particularly the impactofroadson wildlife inthe Indiancountryside. dry in summermonths and mammals may have moved away ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS atthistime. Most ofthe deaths (6/8) observed in this season wereofdomesticanimals(dogs,n=4,cats,n=2)lendingsome credence to this surmise. This study was conducted while carrying out field studies underthe Project“Impact ofland use changes on the Implicationsofthestudy ecology and habiat ofthe Sarus Crane Grus antigone in the Thisstudysuggeststhatmortalityratesduetovehicular Indo-gangetic flood plains” ofthe Wildlife Institute ofIndia traffic isquite lowforallthetaxastudied,andthatpopulations (WII)and1thanktheDirectorandB.C.Choudhuryforfacilities ofmostspeciesmaynotbesignificantlyaffectedbyroadkills and infrastructure. I was supported by Research Fellowships duetotraffic. Nospecies ofconservation concern was killed awarded by WII. Field assistance was rendered by D. Singh by traffic during this study. The results ofthis study are in andA.Verma. SettingupofafieldstationatEtawahwasmade contrastwiththoseobtainedhornotherregions inthecountry. possibleduetothehospitalityofR.Chauhanandfamily. Ithank Roads in agricultural areas do not seem to be causing large- B. Priya, Sushma and K. Vasudevan for providing useful scale mortalities ofvertebrate fauna. However, many more referencesandN.M. Ishwarforcommentingonapreviousdraft. REFERENCES Ali. S. & S.D. Ripley(1989): Concise handbookofthe birdsofIndia Illinois. Landscape and Urban Planning 44: 77-85. and Pakistan. Oxford University Press, Delhi. Forman, R.T.T. & L.E. Alexander (1998): Roads and their major Anon (2001). India 2001. A reference manual. Publications division, ecological effects. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 29: 207-231. MinistryofInformationandBroadcasting.GovernmentofIndia. Gokula,V.( 997): ImpactofvehiculartrafficonsnakesinMudumalai Clarke, GP.. P.C.L. White & S. Harris (1998): Effect ofroads on Wildlife Sanctuary. Cobra 27: 26-30. badgers Melesmeles populations in south-west England. Biol. Goosem. M. (1997): Internal fragmentation: The effects of roads, Cons. 86: 117-124. highways andpowerlineclearingson movementsandmortality Clevenger.A.P.. B. Chruszcz&K.E. Gunson(2003): Spatial patterns of rainforest vertebrates. Pp. 241-255. In: Tropical forest and factors influencing small vertebrate fauna road-kill remnants: Ecology, management, and conservation of aggregations. Biol. Cons. 109: 15-26. fragmented communities, (Eds: Laurence, W.F. & R.O. Daveley, P.F. & PC. Stouffer(2001): Effectsofroadsonmovements Bierregaard). UniversityofChicagoPress, Chicago. byunderstorybirdsinmixed-speciesflocksinCentralAmazonian FIodar, J.A., J.M. Plueguezuelos & J.C. Poveda (2000): Habitat Brazil. Cons. Biol. 15: 1416-1422. selection ofthe Common Chameleon (Chamaeleochamaeleon Dhindsa,M.S...I.S.Sandhu.PS. Sandhu&H.S.Toor(1988) Roadside (L.)) in an area under development in southern Spain: birds in Punjab (India): relation to mortality from vehicles. implications for conservation. Biol Cons. 94: 63-68. Envtl. Cons. 15: 303-310. Huijser, M.P. & P.J.M. Bergers(2000): Theeffectofroadsandtraffic Fahrig,L.,J.L. Pedlar, S.E. Pope, P.D.Taylor&J.F.Wegner(1995): on hedgehog (Erinaceus europaeus) populations. Biol. Cons. Theeffectofroadtrafficon amphibiandensity. Biol. Cons. 73: 95: 1 1 1-116. 177-182. Kumara,H.N.,A.K. Sharma,A. Kumar& M. Singh(2000): Roadkills Finder, R.A.,J.L. Roseberry &A. Woolf(1999): Site and landscape ofwildfaunainIndiraGandhiWildlifeSanctuary,WesternGhats, conditions at white-tailed deer vehicle collision locations in India: Implicationsformanagement. BiosphereCons 3: 41-47. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc., 101 (3), Sep-Dec 2004 397 VERTEBRATE MORTALITY DUE TO VEHICULARTRAFFIC Rajvanshi, A., V.B. Mathur, GC. Teleki & S.K. Mukherjee (2001): Trombulak, S.C. & C.A. Frisswell (2000): A review ofecological Roads,sensitive habitats andwildlife: environmental guideline effects ofroads on terrestrial and aquatic communities. Cons. for India and south Asia. Wildlife Institute ofIndia, Dehradun Biol. 14: 18-30. and Canadian Environmental Collaborative Ltd., Toronto. VanDerZande,A.N.,W.J.T. Keurs&W.J. VanDerWeijden(1980): Serrano, M., L. Sanz, J. Puig & J. Pons (2002): Landscape The impactofroads on the densities offourbird species in an fragmentation caused by the transport network in Navarra open field habitat - evidence for a long-distance effect. Biol. (Spain):Two-scaleanalysisandlandscapeintegrationassessment. Cons. 18: 299-321. Landscape and Urban Planning 58: 113-123. Vuayakumar,S.P.,K.Vasudevan&N.M.Ishwar(2001):Herpetofaunal Sharma,S.K.(1988): Birdcasualtiesinroadaccidents.J. BombayNat. mortality on roads in the Anamalai hills, southern Western Hist. Soc. 85: 195-197. Ghats. Hamadryad 26: 253-260. 398 J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc., 101 (3), Sep-Dec 2004