Morphology of the aortic arch: a factor determining aortic hemodynamics and the load on the heart ? Celine Joos Supervisors: Prof. dr. ir. Patrick Segers, Dr. Laurent Demulier (UZ Gent) Counsellor: Alessandra Bavo Master’s dissertation submitted in order to obtain the academic degree of Master of Science in Biomedical Engineering Department of Electronics and Information Systems Chair: Prof. dr. ir. Rik Van de Walle Faculty of Engineering and Architecture Academic year 2015-2016 The author, Celine Joos, gives permission to make this master dissertation available for consultation and to copy parts of this master dissertation for personal use. In the case of any other use, the copyright terms have to be respected, in particular with regard to the obligation to state expressly the source when quoting results from this master dissertation - 10/06/2016. Preface In this section I would like to thank some people for their intellectual and psychological support. Whenitcomestotheintellectualpartofthestory, ProfessorSegersandAlessandraarethe two major players. I would like to thank them for their valuable insights while generating the models, adapting the solution methods and interpreting the results. For the correction of this typoscript special thanks go to Alessandra for her extra-ordinary efforts and late nights. Further should be thanked: Dr. Demulier for his interesting idea which led to the production of this work and Dr. Devos for the generation of the high quality data. Psychological support came especially from Koen, Gerlinde, FM, Joke, Nika and my par- ents. Thank you. Abstract Abnormalities of the aortic arch, as the most proximal site of the cardiovascular system, are of great interest due to its major role in blood distribution to all downstream members. By means of running computational fluid dynamic simulations on (1) idealized geometries and (2) realistic patient-specific geometries the aortic blood flow patterns related to the morphology of the aortic arch are investigated. Three separate morphologies - the physio- logicalromanesquearchmorphologyandtheabnormalcrenelandgothicarchmorphologies - are compared. Although the helical blood flow patterns in the aorta are necessary for proper function- ing of the cardiovascular system, the abnormal gothic arch geometry is associated with a more widespread helical flow pattern compared to arches with less sharp angles. From the preliminary results of this work, it could be hypothesized that the pronounced helical flow reducestheaxialbloodvelocitytoomuchandsoreducestheefficiencyofthecardiovascular system. Furthermore, the gothic arch morphology, which is known to be correlated with hypertension induces larger pressure variations when compared to a romanesque or crenel morphology, which can result in an increased cardiac load. So, it can be hypothesized that abnormal arch geometry leads to adverse effects on cardiovascular functioning due to (1) an overexpression of the helical flow pattern and to (2) larger pressure variations. Morphology of the Aortic Arch: A Factor Determining Aortic Hemodynamics and the Load of the Heart? Celine Joos Supervisors: Patrick Segers, Alessandra Bavo, Laurent Demulier enumerated. The disturbed flow patterns are often Abstract By means of running computational fluid dynamic encountered at certain sites in the human arterial system: at simulations on (1) idealized geometries and (2) realistic patient- the outer wall of arterial bifurcations and the inner wall of specific geometries the aortic blood flow patterns related to the curved vessels. Hypertension, another promotor for various morphology of the aortic arch are investigated. Three separate vascular disorders (acute aortic dissection, aortic dilatation morphologies - the physiological romanesque arch morphology and aneurysm formation) occurs in 50\% of the adult Turner and the abnormal crenel and gothic arch morphologies - are population. De Groote et al. (2014) found that hypertension is compared. independently associated with abnormal arch geometry in TS Although the helical blood flow patterns in the aorta are patients. necessary for proper functioning of the cardiovascular system, In the analysis of Ou et al (2004) three categories of the abnormal gothic arch geometry is associated with a more widespread helical flow pattern compared to arches with less geometries are classified: the romanesque, the crenel and the sharp angles. From the preliminary results of this work, it could gothic morphology (Figure 1). be hypothesized that the pronounced helical flow reduces the axial blood velocity too much and therefore reduces the efficiency of the cardiovascular system. Furthermore, the gothic arch morphology, which is known to be correlated with hypertension induces larger pressure variations when compared to a romanesque or crenel morphology, which can result in an increased cardiac load. So, it can be hypothesized that abnormal arch geometry leads to adverse effects on cardiovascular functioning due to (1) an overexpression of the helical flow pattern and to (2) larger pressure variations. Keywords CFD simulations, aortic arch morphology, Turner syndrome, helical blood flow patterns Figure 1: Three different morphologies of the aortic shape (adapted I. INTRODUCTION from Ou et al., 2004) In vascular diseases, the local blood flow characteristics (Ullrich-)Turner syndrome (TS) is the most common play a significant role in the development and progression of chromosomal abnormality in females and is associated with the pathology and should therefore be studied in detail. A several co-morbidities. It is a congenital endocrine disorder in detailed knowledge of pressure and flow distributions in the which one of the two X sex chromosomes is lacking (= arterial tree is also indispensable in diagnostics and planning monosomy X = karyotype 45,X) or abnormal. The prevalence of treatment. Modeling of the cardiovascular system is one is 1 in 2000-3500 live-born females way to acquire this knowledge. The main goal of this thesis is The presence of congenital heart diseases is a clinical to provide a simple yet reliable tool to numerically investigate feature developed in 30-50% of TS cases. The most important the fluid dynamics of the aortic arch and identify the possible malformations are, among others: dilatation of the ascending correlations between abnormal flow patterns and the different aorta, a bicuspid aortic valve, aortic coarctation or narrowing, morphologies. an elongated transverse arch, aberrant right subclavian artery, and aortic arch hypoplasia (Mortensen et al., 2010). It should be emphasized that these cardiovascular abnormalities often II. MATERIALS AND METHODS occur simultaneously and increase the overall burden for the Generally, the patient-specific computational fluid patient. The prevalence of a geometrically abnormal arch is 30 dynamics (CFD) model generation and solution can be to 50% in TS patients. described in seven main stages: (1) Medical imaging, (2) Vascular disorders are primarily related to arteriosclerosis. segmentation and reconstruction, (3) discretization, (4) The development of arteriosclerosis is a multifactorial process Boundary conditions (BCs) and modeling assumptions, (5) influenced by a combination of several modifiable (obesity) numerical simulation, (6) post-processing and (7) validation and non-modifiable (age) risk factors. Among the risk factors (Figure 2 and 3). hemodynamic parameters, such as disturbed blood flow, low wall shear rate and wall shear stress (WSS) can be A. Idealized geometries As various cardiac malformations often occur simultaneously in patients, it is difficult to independently investigate the impact of the distorted geometry on the hemodynamics. To isolate the effect of the aortic arch morphology on the fluid dynamics, simplified CFD models, which resemble the anatomical arch shapes in the cases of interest, are derived. As the idealized geometries were generated in Siemens NX 9.0, this one step replaces the first two stages, being medical imaging and segmentation/reconstruction (Figure 2). The dimensions for the generation of the geometries are averaged from the patient-specific data and are in agreement with literature data. Figure 2: Applied workflow for the idealized geometries Figure 4: Four patient-specific aorta models with their distinct unique shapes B. Patient-specific geometries The first patient (P1) shows a romanesque aortic arch, a dilated aortic root and a common ostium of the brachiocephalic trunk (BC) and left common carotid artery (LCC). P2 is a patient with a crenel-shaped arch, a dilated left subclavian artery (LS) and a common ostium of the BC and LCC. The subject with the aortic arch most resembling the gothic shape (P3) has a right-turning aorta and four, instead of three, supra-aortic arteries. The right common carotid artery (RCC) and the right subclavian (RS) artery do not originate from a common brachiocephalic trunk, but branch off separately. The right subclavian artery is, in this case, the third branching off from the main aorta. A patient (P4) with a very asymmetrical and dysmorphic aorta was chosen. This case cannot be classified into one of the main categories; the aorta is elongated, it shows a coarctation and a dilated LS. To create the patient-specific 3D computer models of the relevant vasculature, the Vascular Modeling ToolKit Lab software (VMTKLab by Orobix, Bergamo, Italy) is used. The Figure 3: Applied workflow for the patient-specific geometries contrast-enhanced MR-images were segmented in order to Four geometrically relevant models (Figure 4) of patients identify the contours of the vascular tissue. After pre- with a congenital cardiovascular disease were chosen from a processing this extracted geometry defines the computational medical database of 80 subjects who suffer from Turner’s domain. Due to the high quality of the images this step of the syndrome. All subjects received a three-yearly MRI as part of model generation is quite simple, but nevertheless very their medical follow up. Based on the quality of the MRI operator dependent. images, the shape of the arch and the availability of additional clinical data, relevant subjects were selected. C. Meshing and elements In three of the cases, the shape of the arch was classified as To solve the Navier-Stokes equations numerically, the flow in Ou et al. (2004) resulting in romanesque, crenel and gothic domain has to be split into control volumes (cells) in order to arches. The fourth case was chosen because of the complexity compute the solution. A tetrahedral mesh is used due to the of its arch shape: the presence of a highly distorted geometry complexity of the patient-specific geometries. To have a more did not allow for a classification, but it was considered an reliable description of the WSS at the wall, a boundary layer interesting testing case for the purposes of this work (Figure was generated to guarantee a layer of refined cells. A mesh 4). sensitivity study is conducted. With ANSYS-ICEM (Ansys Inc., USA) grids with 350.000 - 400.000 elements are E. Hemodynamic parameters obtained for the simplified geometries. For the patient-specific The wall shear stress (WSS) is defined as the tangential geometries the meshes are larger, up to 900.000 elements. force per unit area that is exerted by the flowing fluid on the surface of the conduit tube. In arteries in specific, the WSS is D. Boundary conditions and modeling assumptions the mechanical force generated by the blood flow to shear the Flow recordings were available from MR analysis in a plane endothelial layer of the vessel wall. The wall shear stress τ is w perpendicular on (1) ascending and descending aorta and (2) calculated as: the supra-aortic arteries. Reynolds and Womersley numbers are listed in Table 1. (1) Table 1: Reynolds and Womersley numbers with (cid:181) the dynamic viscosity, y the direction perpendicular to Remean Repeak Wo the wall and v the velocity tangent to the wall. P1 600 2900 24 To obtain one single value for the wall shear stress over one P2 1000 4300 15 heart cycle, the time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS) is P3 900 4000 18 commonly used. The TAWSS is calculated by averaging the P4 800 2800 16 norm of the time dependent wall shear vector, τ, over one cardiac cycle with period T: Time-dependent flat velocity profiles are imposed at the inlets. For the idealized geometries the profile is averaged from the available patient-specific velocity profiles. The peak velocity is 0,46 m/s, the average velocity over an entire cycle (2) 0,12 m/s. The pulse period of this waveform is 1s. This results with n the number of time steps in the CFD simulation. in an average Reynolds number of 600, a maximum Reynolds number of 3400 and a Womersley number of 17. Blood flow is normally assumed to be laminar in large vessels because the III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION mean flow velocity is predicted to be sufficiently low to result in a relatively low Reynolds number. For pulsatile unsteady A. Flow patterns flow, turbulence occurs at a Reynolds number much larger The gothic arch geometry is associated with a more than expected for steady flow because accelerating flow is widespread helical flow pattern compared to arches with less more stable than decelerating flow (Tse et al., 2013). sharp angles (Figure 5). The outflow discharges were derived from the flow According to literature (Morbiducci et al., 2009; Lee et al., recordings (Table 2). For the idealized geometries the flow 2014) it can be concluded that helical blood flow patterns are split distribution of P1 is used. necessary for proper functioning of the cardiovascular system. Table 2: Flow split distributions The helical pattern seems to prevent energy dissipation by keeping the flow laminar and facilitates ventricular ejection. P1 P2 P3 P4 Additionally the oxygen transfer is promoted and the BC 11,5 27,0 / 13,5 concentration of low-density lipoproteins on the luminal LCC 10,5 3,0 5,5 8,0 surface is reduced. LS 8,0 3,0 3,0 3,0 From the preliminary results of this work, it could be RCC / / 9,0 / hypothesized that the pronounced helical flow, promoted by RS / / 5,5 / the acute angle in the gothic morphology, reduces the axial OUTLET 70,0 67,0 77,0 75,5 blood velocity too much and therefore reduces the efficiency of the cardiovascular system. Blood is considered an istotropic, incompressible, homogeneous, Newtonian, viscous fluid in large arteries with the dynamic viscosity of 0.0035 Pa s and the mass density of 1060 kg/m3. The aortic wall is assumed to be rigid with no- slip condition at the wall. Three cardiac cycles were simulated in a test phase. No significant difference was observed in the results (< 2% difference in outlet velocity at peak systole) of the second and the third cycle. Therefore, only two cycles, with time steps of 5 ms for the idealized geometries and 2 ms for the patient- specific geometries, for the remaining simulations are computed. The convergence criterion selected is the relative reduction of the residuals of the Navier-Stokes equations of three orders of magnitude. The simulations are performed on a high performance Linux computing cluster (6 CPU’s) dedicated to computational mechanics of Ghent University and are performed in ANSYS Fluent 14.0. B. WSS Figure 6: TAWSS for the simplified geometries (High scale) - left: romanesque arch - middle: crenel arch — right: gothic arch High TAWSS values are around 1,5-3 Pa. Only in the abnormal arches TAWSS > 3,5 Pa are observed. High TAWSS values are more frequently detected in the gothic arch than in the other. The TAWSS values in the arch are of the same order of magnitude as the values reported from the FSI model of (Lantz et al., 2011). The occurrence of high TAWSS expresses regions with high risk of vasodilation and then remodeling to a larger diameter with the same arterial structure (Ku et al., 1997). From a fluid mechanical standpoint, this implies that there is a higher chance for remodeling in a gothic arch than in a romanesque or crenel one. C. Pressure While velocities can be obtained from in vivo measurements, it is extremely difficult to obtain quantitative information on pressure. As the current work focuses on CFD simulations, all the results are reported in terms of pressure drop. The absolute pressure does not influence the velocity Figure 5: Streamlines for the patient-specific geometries of P1, P2 field, as the pressure gradient is present in the Navier-Stokes and P3 in the decelerating phase (late systole) equations. features of pathological arches to verify the preliminary results obtained in the simplified model, to gain deeper insights on the pathological fluid-dynamics of the desired arch morphology and to propose a comparative study on the impact of the shape of the arch on the overall hemodynamics of the region. REFERENCES [1] K. De Groote, D. Devos, K. Van Herck, L. Demulier, W Buysse, J. De Schepper, and D. De Wolf. Abnormal aortic arch morphology in turner syndrome patients is a risk factor for hypertension. Heart Vessels, 2014. [2] J. Lantz, J. Renner, and M. Karlsson. Wall shear stress in a subject specific human aorta - influence of fluid-structure interaction. Figure 7: Pressure drop along the centerline at peak systole for the International Journal of Applied Mechanics, 3(4):759—778, 2011. simplified geometries [3] Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 37(3):516—531, 2009. The most significant result of the pressure analysis of the [4] D.N. Ku. Blood flow in arteries. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, idealized geometries is that the romanesque arch always 29:399—434, 1997. shows the smallest pressure gradient when compared to the [5] C.-H. Lee, K.-S. Liu, G.-H. Jhong, S.-J. Liu, M.-Y. Hsu, C.-J. Wang, other geometries (Figure 7). In fact, this geometry is the most and K.C. Hung. Finite element analysis of helical flows in human comparable to the physiological configuration, in which the aortic arch: A novel index. Biomi- crofluidics, 8:1—13, 2014. heart is optimized to minimize the energy consumption. In the [6] U. Morbiducci, R. Ponzini, G. Rizzo, M. Cadioli, A. Esposito, F. De Cobelli, A. Del Maschio, F.M. Montevecchi, and A. Redaelli. In vivo pathological cases, the abnormal shape forces the heart to a quantification of helical blood flow in human aorta by time-resolved higher energy consumption to overcome the increased three-dimensional cine phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging. pressure gradient in the aortic arch. The analysis of the [7] K.H. Mortensen, B.E. Hjerrild, N.H. Andersen, K.E. S¿rensen, A. patient-specific cases yields the same results. H¿rlyck, E.M. Ped- ersen, E. Lundorf, J.S. Christiansen, and C.H. Gravholt. Abnormalities of the major intrathoracic arteries in turner syndrome as revealed by magnetic resonance imaging. Cardiology in the Young, 20:191—200, 2010. [8] P. Ou, D. Bonnet, L. Auriacombe, E. Pedroni, F. Balleux, Sidi D., and E. Mousseaux. Late systemic hypertension and aortic arch geometry after successful repair of coarctation of the aorta. European Heart Journal, 25:1853—1859, 2004. [9] K.M. Tse, R. Chang, H.P. Lee, S.P. Lim, S.K. Venkatesh, and P. Ho. A computational fluid dynamics study on geometrical influence of the aorta on haemodynamics. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 43:829—838, 2013. Figure 8: Pressure drop along the centerline at peak systole for P4 It is noteworthy that P4 shows a pressure drop (Figure 8) which is one order of magnitude larger than the remaining patients (not shown). The coarctation is the most obvious cause for this large pressure drop across the arch, but the sharp angle and the tortuosity of the geometry also introduce additional hydraulic resistance. IV. CONCLUSION Disturbed hemodynamics poses a severe risk in terms of development of cardiovascular diseases. Blood flow in the human aorta is of particular interest because the highly curved aorta is the largest vessel in the human vascular system and plays a major role in blood distribution to all downstream members. Secondary flow motions are considered to facilitate ventricular ejection, promote oxygen transfer and reduce the risk of atherosclerosis. So, a better understanding of the mechanism of flows in the aortic arch is important. In conclusion, this work aimed to investigate the influence of the arch morphology on the flow field with two separated but complementary models. A simplified model approach was adopted to separate the shape of the arch from the remaining complications present in a more refined model. The second adopted modeling modality was a CFD patient-specific model. With this technique we targeted the patient-specific
Description: