Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research University of Al-Qadisiyah / College of Medicine Department of Microbiology Molecular Characterization of Antibacterial Resistant Genes in Escherichia coli Isolated from Clinical Samples A Thesis Submitted to the Council of the College of Medicine / University of Al-Qadisiyah in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of Master of Science in Medical Microbiology By Alaa Hamza Jaber Al-Jelehawy B.Sc. Laboratory Investigation / Kufa University (2014) Supervised by Assistant Professor Assistant Professor Assistant Dr. Ibtisam H. Al-Azawi Dr. Aqeel R. Hassa October 2016 A.D. Muharram Al-Haram 1438 A. ميحرلا نحمرلا للها مسب ًاميظَع َكْيَلَع للها لُـُْضَف َنَاَكَو مُلَْعَت نُُْكَُْت مَلاَم َكملََّعَو ميظعلا يلعلا للها قدص ءاسنلا ةروس )111( ةيلآا Dedication This work is dedicated To Al-Imam Ali (Aleh Alsalam) To My dear country (Iraq) And to The spirit of my father Alaa 2016 Acknowledgements In the name of God the most merciful compassionate, the peace and the mercy upen our Messenger prophet Mohammed and his sanctified household. All thanks to God for granting me with will, strength, and patience with which this research had been accomplished. I would like to express my gratitude to the deanery of College of Medicine and the headship of Department of Microbiology for the support and facilities I received. It is a pleasure to express my deep appreciation to my supervisors: Assistant Professor Dr. Ibtisam H. Al-Azawi and Assistant Professor Dr. Aqeel R. Hassan, for their valuable guidance, assistance, streanth, and motivation throughout the cource of preparing my thesis, during the progress of the present work. I am grateful to the Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Kufa for providing me with facilities to complete this research. I'd like to express my sincere thanks and appreciation to Assist Prof. Dr. Ahmed Abduljabbar Jaloob Al-Janaby for his support and advice. I'd like to express my deep appreciation to Dr. Arshad Nori Al- Dujaili, Head of the Department of Biology, and to Dr.Mohammed Alzeyadi for his support and advice. I would like to thank Prof. Dr. Ali Muhsin Al-Mohana Department of Microbiology / College of Medicine / Kufa University for his valuable advices. I would like to thank Prof. Dr. Abdulkareem A. Mahmood. / College of Medicine / Kufa University for his valuable advices. Last but not the the least, I am indeed grateful to my family for their understanding, and their great help in accomplishing my study. To all, please accept my truthful thanks. Alaa 2016 Summary: This study was designed to identify the distribution of some genes responsible for antibacterial resistance in Escherichia coli isolated from different clinical samples by using phenotypic methods and genotypic technique (by monoplex PCR). A total of 400 samples were collected from urine (n=100), stool (n=75), and blood (n=45) from patients admitted to the Al-Hamza Hospital in Al-Diwaniya City and Al-Sadder medical City in Al-Najaf Governorate-Iraq. The results demonstrated that there were 220 specimens (55%) were diagnosed as gram negative bacteria. From total of 220 specimens there were 49 isolates (22.27%) identified as E. coli by cultural, biochemical characteristics and Vitek-2 system. The susceptibility of E. coli isolates towards 14 type of antibiotics were tested using disk diffusion method. The results showed that all isolates of E. coli (100%) were resistant to cefotaxime, 39 (79.59%) isolates were multidrug resistant, 9 isolates (18.36%) were extensive drug resistant. This study proved that 47 isolates (95.91%) were resistant to ampicillin and tobramycin, 41isolates (83.67%) were resistant to amoxicillin+clavulanic acid. The results of the present study demonstrated that 39 isolates (79.59%) and 38 isolates (77.55%) of E.coli were resistant to ceftriaxone and ceftazidime respectively. The current study showed that 34 isolates of E. coli (69.38%) were resistant to azteronam, 26 isolates (53.06%) were resistant to nalidixic acid, 21 isolates (42.85%) were resistant to ciprofloxacin & gentamycin, 17 isolates (34.69%) were resistant to cefoxitin, 8 isolates (16.32%) were resistant to chloramphenicol, 6 isolates (12.24%) and 2 isolates (4.08%) were resistant to nitrofurantoin & imipenem respectively. On the other hand, all of E. coli isolates (49) were detected as the potential ESBL-producers by using confirmatory method (double disk synergy test), the results showed that out of 49 isolates of E. coli examined in this study, ESBL were detected in only one isolates (2.04%). Polymerase Chain Reaction has been used to detect of some genes encoding for antimicrobial resistance in E. coli isolates. Regarding genes that responsible for ESBL enzymes (bla , bla and bla ), the CTX-M OXA TEM current results proved that bla genes have highest rate (100%) TEM followed by bla and bla (91.83 %) for each. CTX-M OXA Finally, present study showed some plasmid mediated quinolones resistance genes (qnrA, qnrB and qnrS). Results demonstrated that these genes have the same percentage (100%). List of contents Numbers Title page Summery 1-11 List of contents V11-111 List of tables V11- V111 List of figures V111 List of abbreviation IX-X Chapter One Introduction and Literature Review 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Aim of study 3 1.2 Literature Review 4 1.2.1 Taxonomy and Description 4 1.2.2 Growth culture 5 1.2.3 Pathogenicity 5 1.2.3.1 Enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC) 6 1.2.3.2 Enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) 7 1.2.3.3 Enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC) 8 1.2.3.4 Eenterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) 8 1.2.3.5 Enteroaggregative E. coli (EAggEC) 9 1.2.3.6 Diffusely adherent E. coli (DAEC) 11 1.2.4 Antibiotics resistance 11 1.2.4.1 Genetics of bacterial antibiotics resistance 13 1.2.4.1.1 Antibiotic resistance via mutations 13 Antibiotic resistance via horizontal gene 1.2.4.1.2 13 transfer 1.2.5 β-lactam antibiotics 14 1.2.5.1 Mechanism of β-lactams action 14 1.2.6 β-lactamase inhibitors 14 1.2.7 β- Lactamase 16 1.2.7.1 Classification of β-lactamases 16 1.2.7.2 Mechanism of action of β-lactamases 16 1.2.7.3 Type of β-Lactamase 17 1.2.7.3.1 Extended spectrum β-lactamases 17 1.2.7.3.2 Carbapenemases 19 1.2.7.3.3 AmpC β-lactamases 19 Molecular Mechanisms of Action of 1.2.8 01 Quinolones 1.2.9 Plasmid-Mediated Quinolone Resistance 01 Chapter Two Materials and Methods 2 Materials and methods 03 2.1 Materials 03 2.1.1 Instruments and Equipments 03 2.1.2 Biological and Chemical Materials 04 2.1.3 Culture Media 05 2.1.4 Antibiotics 06 Antibiotic 2.1.4.1 06 discs standard Strain 2.1.5 07 Bacterium 0.1.6 PCR Materials 07 2.1.6.1 Master Mix 07 PCR Amplification PMQR 2.1.6.2 08 Primers 2.1.6.3 PCR Amplification ESBLs Primers 08 2.2 Methods 09 2.2.2 Preparation of Buffers and Solutions 09 McFarland (0.5) Turbidity 2.2.2.1 09 Standard 2.2.2.2 Normal Saline solution 09 Phosphate buffer 2.2.2.3 09 solution(PBS) 2.2.2.4 Urea solution 31 2.2.2.5 EDTA Solutions for disks preparation 31 2.2.3 β-lactam Antibiotic Solutions 31 2.2.4 Solutions used for β-lactamase detection 31 2.2.5 Solutions Used in DNA Extraction 31 2.2.5.1 Tris-EDTA Buffer (TE) Buffer 31 2.2.5.2 Salt-Tris-EDTA (STE) Buffer 31
Description: