EA40CH13-Doyle ARI 23March2012 14:10 Molecular and Fossil Evidence on the Origin of Angiosperms y. nl James A. Doyle go s.oruse viewonal Demepaialr:[email protected],UniversityofCalifornia,Davis,California95616; annualreFor pers w.2. w1 w1/ m 5/2 o0 d fron ownloademonosov Do 26. of L 301-3brary 0:Li ci. 2012.4Scientific ATnhneuA.nRneuva.lERaervtihewPloafnEeatr.tShcai.n2d0P1l2a.n4et0a:r3y0S1c–i2en6cesis KCreeytawceoorudss,molecularsystematics,paleobotany,palynology,phylogeny Earth Planet. Se University - oT1C0noh.lp1iisn1year4ri6agtt/ihcaetlnea(cid:2)n’rcstuhdr2.eoa0vin1:-n2euabraytlhrAe-v0ni4ne2wu7as1l.o1Rr-eg1v0i5e3w1s3. AMthbeoislretcrinuaclcartreadsaintagomnorreplahtoiolongsihciaplsdwiviethrsinityanthgrioosupgehrmthsecoCnrfietramcetohuesvrieeflwecttheadt ev. Stat Allrightsreserved their evolutionary radiation. Despite the early appearance of aquatics and Rw Annu. Mosco 0084-6597/12/0530-0301$20.00 gmrooluepcsulwaritthreseismtphlaettflhoewfierrsst,atnhgeiorespcoerrmdsiswceorneswisoteondtywpiltahntisnwfeirtehnpciensnfartoemly y veinedleaves,multipartedflowers,uniovulateascidiatecarpels,andcolumel- b larmonosulcatepollen.Moleculardataappeartorefutethehypothesisbased onmorphologythatangiospermsandGnetalesareclosestlivingrelatives. Morphologicalanalysesoflivingandfossilseedplantsthatassumemolec- ularrelationshipsidentifyglossopterids,Bennettitales,andCaytoniaasan- giospermrelatives;theseresultsareconsistentwithproposedhomologiesbe- tweenthecupuleofglossopteridsandCaytoniaandtheangiospermbitegmic ovule.Jurassicmoleculardatesfortheangiospermsmaybereconciledwith thefossilrecordifthefirstangiospermswererestrictedtowetforestunder- storyhabitatsanddidnotradiateuntiltheCretaceous. 301 EA40CH13-Doyle ARI 23March2012 14:10 INTRODUCTION Inthepast20years,phylogeneticanalysesofDNAsequencedatahaverevolutionizedthinking abouttheoriginandevolutionofmanygroupsoforganisms.Theimpactofmoleculardatahas beenespeciallyprofoundinangiosperms,orfloweringplants,whichrosetodominanceinmost terrestrialecosystemsduringtheCretaceous.Bythelate1990s,analysesofmultiplegenesledthe AngiospermPhylogenyGroup(1998)toproposeanewhigher-levelphylogeneticclassificationof angiosperms,whichhasremainedremarkablystablewithstudiesofincreasingnumbersofgenes (Angiosperm Phylogeny Group 2009), including nearly complete chloroplast genomes (Jansen etal.2007,Mooreetal.2007).Asinothertaxa,molecularphylogeneticstudiesofangiosperms haverevealedbothagreementswithpreviousideasderivedfromthefossilrecord,whichcould betakenasreaffirmingthevalueofbothfossilandmoleculardata,andapparentconflicts,which y. nl raisequestionsabouttheinterpretationofbothlinesofevidence. go s.oruse Thisreviewexploresareasofcongruenceandconflictandwaysinwhichconflictsmightbe annualreviewFor personal rtloeiefomsanonalwvgroeyiodudsl(ipdcvefeir.nrmDvsiosfiol,cyvoaelertpiso2ry0ninm0,a1eapm)ro.ilImpyhfoaoanrcspuiuzhsniinoedgnse,ratbshptyeahntoyrdarloiinnggsgiefnonoroefmfttihaacnetfigrooairnomigsopeifnwesrootmrfruktsch,.taeAusdrsdeiusisstciktcninencsogtsiwufvuineslhnisneoedwlrueftirlniaoottmnreidnttoshpieltcahifnreeteaspvt,ruoaorlnubed--s ww.12. secondarilyanunderstandingofextrinsicaspects,suchaswhenandwherethesechangesoccurred w1/ m 5/2 andunderwhatenvironmentalselectivepressures. o0 d fron Downloadeomonosov SPrTioArTtoUtSheO1F96T0sH, tEhePfoRsOsilBreLcEorMd oPfRthIeOoRrigTinOanMdOrisLeEoCf aUnLgiAosRpeSrmYsSwTaEsMthoAuTghItCtSo be 26. of L unusuallymysterious,becauseofboththelackoffossiltaxaintermediatebetweenangiosperms 0:301-3Library aannddAotlhbiearngsrtoaugpessoafntdhtehEeacrhlyarCacretetarcoefotuhse.TeahrelireesctoarndgtihosepnecromnsriescteodrdlairngethlyeoBfalerraevmesi,awn,hAicphtihaand, ci. 2012.4Scientific ba2p0epe0ne9a)i,rdetehdna“ttisfiutheddedeognrrlocyuo”pminop“ramirgeoidndawetrietndhfoadnrivmde”rdslieevdemrtsooidfiseuerdgngbteeasxftoiaor.enTsth,hgeeoriCensrguelbttaainccegkotiumosDpirnaersswsoiimonneintah1ra8eta7a9wn(giFtihoriseapdepmromaonrs Earth Planet. Se University - faoonfsgdsTiieolphsroipesseciprotmiirocdtsn.uoriTrneihgtbehienebgaeCatesnrtdetditonaecvcteerhoolaoupnpsigceaeadslwtauhiprteelhoasnrusydtlutswdoiainfesistnthhocerafePtfaoeosrsifmnsiAglixlapyenolerolqloreudnTa,(br1wli9eahs5csi2lciic,hm1apan9tr7deo0siv.)ni,dvwaeddheoedvplioodwsetnluaclnaedteobdnatsflhinoa-st ev. Stat ras in geographic areas where plant megafossils were unknown and broader representation of Rw Annu. Mosco ttaoxraemveaaklianngguiopsptheermvepgoeltlaetniobne.fDoreespthiteemneidar-lEyawrloyrCldrweitdaecesoaums,pwlinhge,repaaslysnoomloegsihcaolusltdudhiaevsefbaieleend y transportedfromtheuplandsifangiospermsweregrowingthere,andfoundthatEarlyCretaceous b angiospermpollenwasmuchlessdiversethanexpectedfromfossilleafidentifications(Scottetal. 1960,Brenner1963).Mostsignificantly,thesequenceofappearanceofmajorangiospermpollen typesagreedwithhypothesesonpollenevolutionderivedfromcomparativemorphologyofRecent plants(Figure 1)(Doyle1969,1978;Muller1970).Thefirstangiospermpollenwasmonosul- cate;thatis,ithadasinglefurrowforpollentubegermination,asingymnosperms,monocots, and “magnoliid dicots,” which were thought to include the most primitive angiosperms. This pollen was identified as angiospermous by its columellar exine structure, with radial rods con- necting the inner and outer wall layers (nexine and tectum, respectively). Such pollen is now known back to the Hauterivian or Valanginian (Trevisan 1988, Hughes 1994, Brenner 1996). Monosulcates were followed by tricolpate pollen, characterized by three longitudinal furrows, 302 Doyle EA40CH13-Doyle ARI 23March2012 14:10 Potomac Stages pollen zones Pollen types Zone IV Triporate Cenomanian Normapolles Zone III 999999...666 MMMyyyaaa Dakota Formation Subzone II-C Triangular tricolporate late i j g Tricolporate h Subzone II-B (prolate) f Albian middle y. nl Subzone II-A go views.oronal use early Tricolpate b e ? BuaVrcaoles ,d Fea Amgauliacão, annualreFor pers 111111222 MMMyyyaaa Zone I a c d Torres Vedras? w.2. Aptian Monosulcate w1 w1/ m 5/2 111222555 MMMyyyaaa Yixian (Archaefructus) 26. Downloaded froof Lomonosov on 0 VHBBaa111ael444uarr555trrn...eei555garm MMMsiivniiyyyaaiiaaaaannnn (Vdeitmoartr esieccn anaslloi etoti)nm se dcbea MTPPPeaiinnorlmnnnnaaaoatttcteeeeollllyyyty ( vvdvAeeiesciiisnnaneceeeciddadt,,ee , tsdpromeh o(nyoVtilhoifltuoetipmhrdmh m)mylalLaurremggaiin)n f t y ghfijpePPPPPsaaiiannlllmmmnnaaaaattttteeeeelllllyyyyy vdvvloeieesibiisnnneeeeedcdddt ,pe ,, tdlcpoao etoaarlnttdnhadaoet tecidedo ( smNmeaplruogmuinnbdit e(Ss)apindopsis) 301-3brary (Rogersia, Ficophyllum) ci. 2012.40:Scientific Li FSDtiorgayutlirege&ra1pHhiicckseeyqu1e9n7c6e),owfimthajcoorrraenlgaitoiosnpseromfpploanllte-nbeaanrdinlegalfotcyaplietsieisnitnhoetPhoertogmeoagcrGaprhoiucpaorefaesa.sAtebrbnreNvoiarttihonA:mMeyraic,am(milloiodnifiyeedarfsroamgo. ev. Earth Planet. SState University - utpGeytsepouaaenarl.eldfl1doyw9riai7ntnn7hat;eth)hS,evecabhlsauArtttalembntBihkaajaen1orr9rreaie8,ttmy3tno;oioaPofrn,e“tnhdtohneirceryAony1tpsm9wt,8”ieia6drnn;edoRolwpeferSgkleaanoctleuoiitdtwu&hedndAeVtsbmoiay(feSnormoariucm1oat9nh,a8oeA9crsf;lnuraDildccLeoaaa,tynuealasernmad1(sB9ietard9h)e2.een;TuMnIdbheiirricdsaod1hit9lsisem7.tE6Th2,ear0s1ibct09oa2(9Nsl;6piSc;oactrpDhetohsrolaealynerplnnke- Rw Annu. Mosco &comMmahomnotyupde2i0n0l2i)v.inTgriecuodlpicaotetss,wweirthejaoipnoerdeiinntthheelmatiedAdllebioafnebaychtrfiucorrlpoowr.aTterpicoolllpeonr,attheesmweorset by joinedintheCenomanian(LateCretaceous)bytriporatepollenoftheNormapollesgroup,with three round apertures, as in wind-pollinated Fagales, which most botanists regarded as highly derived. Theseobservationsledtoaconsensusthatthemainradiationofangiospermsoccurredduring theCretaceous.Severalauthorsnotedthatangiospermsmighthaveexistedearlier,but,ifso,they musthavebeenlowindiversityandadvancementtohaveescapeddetection(e.g.,Doyle1969, Muller1970).Thecongruenceofthestratigraphicsequenceofpollentypesandtheirpresumed evolutionary sequence would make no sense if angiosperms had already diversified in a hidden homelandarea;thereisnoreasontoexpectthatgroupswouldmigrateintobetter-knownareasin theorderinwhichtheyhadevolvedmuchearlier.Axelrod(1970)suggestedthatpollenevolution mighthavelaggedbehindthesystematicdiversificationofangiosperms,butothersarguedthat www.annualreviews.org • OriginofAngiosperms 303 EA40CH13-Doyle ARI 23March2012 14:10 this was inconsistent with the systematic congruence of pollen and classification (Muller 1970, Walker&Doyle1975). ThispicturewasconfirmedbystudiesonCretaceousangiospermleaves,whichhadbeenne- glectedsincetheearly1900s.Leavesweretraditionallythoughttohavelowsystematicvalue,but thisviewwaschangingwithmorerigorousmethodsofanalysisofleafcharactersandsurveysof theirsystematicdistribution(Dilcher1974,Hickey&Wolfe1975,Doyle2007).Studiesofan- giospermleavesinthePotomacGroupoftheeasternUnitedStates(Figure1)showedapattern of morphological diversification through time comparable with that seen in the pollen record (Doyle&Hickey1976,Hickey&Doyle1977),bearinginmindthatthesectionbeginslateinthe monosulcatephase.InthelowerPotomac(ZoneIofBrenner1963),probablyAptiantoearliest Albian (Hochuli et al. 2006), angiosperm leaves are rare, simple, and usually pinnately veined, y. with unusually irregular venation. Similar features occur in Recent “woody magnoliid” groups nl go withmonosulcatepollen.Afewarepalmatelyveined,asin“herbaceousmagnoliids.”Ternately s.oruse dissectedleaves(withthreefolddivisionoftheblade),asintheeudicotorderRanunculales,appear viewonal alongwiththefirstraretricolpatepollen(Vitiphyllum).Moreabundantanddivergentleaftypes annualreFor pers abplepewairthinlivthinegutpripceorlpPaotetogmroaucp(sZ,osnucehIIa,smpeidltdalteealenadvelast(eNAellubmiabni)t,esm)sainmyiloarf twohtihcheaaqreuactoicmgpeanrua-s w.2. Nelumbo(lotus),palmatelylobed“platanoids”comparedwithPlatanus(sycamore),andpinnately w1 w1/ dissected and compound leaves (Sapindopsis) now also known to be related to Platanus (Crane om 05/2 etal.1993).MostoftheseleaveshavemoreregularvenationthanthoseinthelowerPotomac. d fron Consistent sequences are known in western North America, Portugal, Kazakhstan, Colombia, Downloadeomonosov B20ra0Tz9i)hl.,easnedadAvragnecnetsindaid(Dnooytlhea&veHaigcrkeeayt1im97p6a,cPtoonnsd1i9sc8u4s,sMionoshrof&thFerioisri2g0in00o,fAarncghiaonspgeerlsmkys;etthaely. 26. of L providedmoreindicationsoncharacterpolarityandtimingoftheradiationthanonrelationships 0:301-3Library wasitchoomthpaerrissoeendspbleatnwtes.enHoFwageavleers,tahnedyGdindehtaelleps,reafnudtefaovldoerredthtehoorsieesbbaasseeddoonnadnegriivoesdpetramxas,swuicthh ci. 2012.4Scientific msJeuoerdansofsesicru)nl,csaasntuedcphpooalsslseginblol(eDsshooopymtleeor1liod9gs7i(8ea)sc.toMufaotlhlsyetPdoieusrtcmeursisaininot)ne,gscuoomrfyteshnteotsooprfeitrghmiensbc(ieTtnertgieamrsesidcica)o,nnagnsioods-CpcaealrylmteodnoiMavu(emlseoawzinoitlihyc Earth Planet. Se University - tDohluielBtcishoeeegneridinz1-enb9die8nab1gry)i.inndgitshccouevp1eu9rl8iee0soso,ffuthfnoedsseserilsttflaaxonawd(ienGrgsaauonsfdstehfnreu1Cit9sr4e(6tFa,rcSieitsoe1ub9sb8ian4ns;gFi1or9si7ips4ee,rtmDalor.ey2cl0eo0r10d9,w7280a,s0R6fuaer,tt2ahl0lea1rc0rkae,v&b-, ev. Stat 2011),mostlyinthemesofossil(millimeter)sizerange.Contrarytoearlierassumptions,flowers Rw Annu. Mosco aarnedostfutedniewdewllitphrsecsaenrvneindgaeslelicgtnroitnemoriccrhoascrocopayloarnXd-craanymbeiceroxttroamctoegdrafrpohmy(sFerdiiismeetnatls.2b0y09si,eFvirniigs y & Pedersen 2011). Flowers have been the mainstay of angiosperm systematics since Linnaeus, b largelybecausetheyaresorichincharacters.Furthermore,fossilflowersoftenhavepolleninthe stamensoronthestigma,whichallowsintegrationwiththedispersedpollenrecord,andtheycan sometimesbeassociatedwithleavesandwood.Studiesoffossilflowershavebroadlyconfirmed thepicturebasedonpollenandleaves,buttheyprovidemoredetailontheactualcladespresent. However,palynologyremainsvaluablebecauseofitsgeographicandstratigraphiccoverage,which increasesconfidenceininferredevolutionarypatterns. These advances were paralleled by the expansion of cladistic (parsimony) methods for phy- logenyreconstruction,initiallyusingmorphologicaldata.Althoughsomemorphologicalcladistic resultshavebeenrefutedbymolecularanalyses,othersthatwerecontroversialatfirsthavebeen confirmed.Inaddition,thecladisticapproachgreatlyclarifiedevolutionaryquestionsbyforcing 304 Doyle EA40CH13-Doyle ARI 23March2012 14:10 Extant sister group Crown group Stem relatives Crown node Stem lineage y. gonl Stem node s.oruse viewonal Figure2 annualreFor pers Creocnoncesptrtuscitncvhoalvreadctienrrsetalatetisnagtftohsesiclrtoawxanagnrdoutrpeensoodfelaivnidngontatxhaeasntdemthelinuesaegoef.parsimonyoptimizationto w.2. systematists to formulate more explicit hypotheses on phylogeny and its relation to character w1 w1/ evolution,whichisnolessimportantinthepresentmolecularera. om 05/2 Molecular results concern only crown groups (a crown group consists of the most recent d fron commonancestorofalivingcladeandallitsderivatives),andnotthestemlineagesconnecting ownloademonosov c(Droowynleg&rouDposnwoigthhuoene1a9n9o3t)h.eFrr,oomreaxtpinhcytlborgaenncehtiecsp(soteinmtroeflavtiievwes,)tfhreomortihgeinseolfinaenaggieoss(pFeirgmusreca2n) Do be broken into two related problems, which are loosely comparable with the classic questions, 26. of L “Whatwerethefirstangiospermslike?”and“Whatdidtheycomefrom?”Thefirstproblemis 301-3brary wherethecrowngrouptreeisrooted,orwhichextantlinesaremostbasal(attachedtothemost 0:Li basalnodes).Basaldoesnotnecessarilymeanprimitive:Livingrepresentativesofbasallinesare ci. 2012.4Scientific uHpsaourswailmelyvoemnr,yogr(eiovroernreleltahstseesdcphcearcriitaaelcritzieaer)dstrooefloalpitvitviimnegtizoteatxhcaheaalronandcgtte-hdreesattadrteecesotmoonmpotohlnoegatyrn,ecewesaetnocdran(eCsutrisimsepatth&eetChpoerionakncic2pe0lse0tr5oa)fl. Rev. Earth Planet. Sw State University - seatmhtxcaaealtymaecd,blpoeeels,veemei,tsnitoifsoirtneumhttoeoghrrrseeltoeaaupsbrpsaesrsedtsnoewimrcfoietvohooenerdfiao,mdnbuaogutsarittoeofisrflporisneemeecrvmoseonwrusastiatltgrrhorueuotc(htuttgheptrehsosian(usamepstatseoraaepstrets-eatdatbkoesenwabionnnrwacganentpsch,pthierrtiaonslmia.gscTatiheynhr;beBagersasoepetecuromiopsens)sai.dbnbAlpeeeglrtaotoaiownbl.r,ltee2ohmc0ueo0tnbig6ssur)tw.olrkFuhuopocarsttf Annu. Mosco cfrhoamracstterurcsttuarteessaktnnoowdnesinbtehloewouthtgeraonugpiso(sapebromttsoamn-duipnafeprphrooawchn)e.wTahnegseioqsupeesrtmiofnesaitnuvreoslveevoalrviesdk by ofcircularreasoning:Wheretheingrouptreeisrootedmaydependonwhichtaxaareconsidered theclosestoutgroups,andviceversa.Thisproblemisbestresolvedbysimultaneousanalysisof bothingroupandoutgrouptaxa. Most morphological cladistic analyses of seed plants indicated that angiosperms were most closely related to living Gnetales and Mesozoic Bennettitales and Pentoxylon—the anthophyte hypothesis,sonamedbecauseallthesetaxahaveflower-likereproductivestructures.Thisrecalled viewsofArber&Parkin(1907),whoalsoassociatedangiospermswithBennettitalesandGnetales. However, some analyses linked anthophytes with Mesozoic seed ferns (Crane 1985, Doyle & Donoghue 1986), others associated them with coniferophytes (Nixon et al. 1994, Rothwell & Serbet1994),andsomemovedCaytoniauptoapositionsistertotheangiosperms(Doyle1996, 2006,2008;Hilton&Bateman2006).Rootingsoftheangiospermswerealsoinconsistent;the www.annualreviews.org • OriginofAngiosperms 305 EA40CH13-Doyle ARI 23March2012 14:10 basal lines in some analyses had multiparted flowers (Magnoliales: Donoghue & Doyle 1989; Calycanthaceae:Loconte&Stevenson1991;Nymphaeales:Doyle1996),whereasthoseinother analyseshadsimpleflowers(Chloranthaceaeand/orPiperales:Nixonetal.1994,Taylor&Hickey 1996). Molecularstudiesprovidenodirectevidenceonrelationshipsofangiospermswithfossils,but theyalmostuniformlyrejectthemainconclusionabouttheirrelationshipswithlivingtaxathat morphologicalanalysesagreedon,namelytheirconnectionwithGnetales.However,molecular datahaveessentiallyresolvedtherootingproblemandtherebygreatlyclarifiedthemorphology ofthefirstangiosperms.Thenextsectionsexplorethestatusofthesephylogeneticquestionsin light of molecular and fossil data and discuss the problem of the time and environment of the origin of angiosperms. Although the topic is the origin of angiosperms, I devote much space y. to the Cretaceous radiation because its interpretation is essential for reconstructing ancestral nl go statesandgainingperspectiveonconflictsbetweenmolecularandfossilevidenceontheageof s.oruse angiosperms. viewonal annualreFor pers MOLECULARANDFOSSILEVIDENCEONTHEFIRSTANGIOSPERMS w.2. Thefirstmolecularanalysesofangiosperms,basedonsinglegenes,gaveinconsistentrootings. w1 w1/ RibosomalRNAidentifiedNymphaeales(waterlilies)asthesistergroupofallotherangiosperms om 05/2 (Hamby & Zimmer 1992), whereas the chloroplast gene rbcL placed the rootless aquatic Cer- d fron atophyllum in this position (Chase et al. 1993). However, since 1999, multigene analyses have Downloadeomonosov y1ari9ee9lld9ae,rdPgearlreykmiinnassroeknnasbeitltyivaelc.ot1on9sc9ihs9to,eiQncetiuoafneotduastl.gta1rto9isu9tp9ics,aP(lGl.ySr.awSheoalmllt-iss&ueptIplaeolsr.t21e09d0999r)e,.sDTul.htEse.s(SeMoalnattiashlyeeswteassl.(&s2e0eD0F5oi)gn,uowgrhehicu3he) 26. of L placedthreelinescontaining∼175speciesatthebaseofthetree,intheso-calledANITAgrade: 0:301-3Library Aclmadbeoroeflllaia,naassc,rsahmrubblsin,agntdresemoarllsthrereusb,tihneNmeowstCfaamleidlioanribae;iNngymIllpichiuamea(lestsa;raanndisAe)u.s(tAroNbIaTileAysatlaens,das ci. 2012.4Scientific afifonvrgeiAcolmsapdbeeorrsme:lClasph,elNocriyeamsntfphoharamceeaaaleec,so,nroIeltleigcdrioafluoeprs,tnhTaemriirmesdeimnmipae,lseaanflndogwioAesurpsset;rrCombeasria(lteCoypaahn.)ytliTlnuohmee;trMeamla.ga2ni0no0iln7iig)d,am>e,9aid9ne.9au%npeoowff Earth Planet. Se University - mapgnrooadlldnePeonpi.wphWeiytrhlaietltmehiscion(ssietenlnuycsdluetirc,diocicntoosgln,psRAaistraetinisnputogonllcooluecfnlhaMilbaeacesgel(oanpweoo)l;piaapmlvieeaosssn,t,oLbccouaourtttersea;rclacelanusd,dpeCse)taueandrnemidclloeasdtecsev,Paeweerani(tltihanopcttherluitecadroliallniepng,aetmWseofaoisnntrtdmoerfdaaewcrbehiaavisecea)hdl, ev. Stat havepentamerousflowerswithaperianthdifferentiatedintofivesepalsandfivepetals,aswellas Rw Annu. Mosco tricSoolpmoeramteopleoclulelnar.resultsthatcontradictedolderviewswereanticipatedbymorphologicalanal- y yses, such as the monophyly of eudicots and the association of Aristolochiaceae with Piperales b (Dahlgren&Bremer1985,Donoghue&Doyle1989).However,morphologicalstudiesgrouped Piperales,Nymphaeales,andmonocotsineitheraparaphyleticgrade(Dahlgren&Bremer1985) oraclade(Donoghue&Doyle1989),ratherthanplacingNymphaealesintheANITAgradeand Piperales in the magnoliid clade. In these cases, morphology was overruled when morphologi- calcharacterswerecombinedwithsequencesofthreegenes(Doyle&Endress2000).Persisting areasofuncertaintyconcernwhetherAmborellaandNymphaealesformtwosuccessivelinesora cladeandthearrangementofthefivemesangiospermclades.InthecombinedanalysisofDoyle &Endress(2000),carpelfeaturesretainedfromtheANITAgradeoverruledmoleculardatain placingChloranthaceaeatthebaseofmesangiosperms(Figure3).Doyle&Endress(2000)did not include Ceratophyllum, but morphological data of Endress & Doyle (2009) linked it with 306 Doyle EA40CH13-Doyle ARI 23March2012 14:10 Mesangiosperms Magnoliidae Austrobaileyales Piperales Magnoliales Nymphaeales Chloranthaceae Canellales Laurales Monocots Eudicots AmborellaHydatellaceaeArchaefructusCabombaBraseniaNupharMonetianthusBarclayaNymphaeoideaeAustrobaileyaTrimeniaAnacostiaSchisandraceaeIlliciumCeratophyllumHedyosmumplantAsteropollis AscarinaSarcandraChloranthusplantPennipollis CanrightiaPiperaceaeSaururaceaeLactorisAsaroideaeAristolochioideaeWinteraceaeWalkeripollisCanellaceaeMyristicaceaeMagnolioideaeLiriodendronArchaeanthusEndressiniaGalbulimimaDegeneriaEupomatiaAnnonaceaeCalycanthoideaeIdiospermumVirginianthusAtherospermataceaeGomortegaSiparunaceaeHortoniaMollinedioideaeMonimioideaeMauldiniaLauraceaeHernandioideaeGyrocarpoideaeAcorusLiliaciditesAraceaeTofieldiaceaeButomusAponogetonScheuchzeriaMelanthiaceaeNartheciaceaeDioscoreaceaeEupteleaPapaveraceaeCircaeasterLardizabalaceaeMenispermaceaeBerberidaceaeHydrastisGlaucidiumCore Ranunculaceae NelumboNelumbitesPlatanusWest Bros platanoidSapindopsisProteaceaeTrochodendronTetracentronSpanomeraBuxaceae y. nl s.orguse o moOnthoecorts euOdthiceorts viewonal annualreFor pers Stigma w.2. w1 Canal w1/ m 5/2 o0 d fron Ovule ownloademonosov OInunteerr i inntteegguummeenntt Do 301-326. brary of L Carpel formATrsicmideinaitae p caaprpuealn oaf StratLiagtrea Aplhbyian – early Cenomanian ci. 2012.40:Scientific Li EAIPnqlsitccueaiirdvtmieoaectdealiate L(E(iBaanutrcelalyu rB c–dao imrnsr,gei Pdm Tudoidlaerdnr Ael e–slbd AVioaepcndtkira, aenst?)c .) ev. Earth Planet. SState University - FPfDfooihorsgysmyuilllo.retgePa&exr3noaEebptnailcbadclrteeerdespseoa(ots2ifmt0ib1ooa0nss)tsa,lpoaaanfnrdosgtiFimhoresoirpinsmei&roomunPsorepecdoloaesttrisitsoieaonnnnsdh(s2iebp0uas1ds1feirc)do.omCotsnoEalaronnerdasilrnyoedsfseisbcs&aroatefnDdDc.hooCeyysloelielno(2edrt0sic0abal9e.t)eh(,2itbn0had0es8enm)da,omoEsnetnsdpmoraoerfsslfesiomc&susolinaDlsriooianuyndsldeicc(moa2ut0oer0rssp9ethr)o,aoftFlioegrvgirioaiscpleauhtltiidacolan.pt(aoo2,sf0iwt0ciiao9trh)np,sel Rw Annu. Mosco pofrolovcidaelidtiebsywPh.Ker.eEtnadxareoscsc.urorhavebeendescribedinmostdetail.DrawingofalongitudinalsectionofanascidiatecarpelofTrimenia y b Chloranthaceae.Inanalysesofnearlycompletechloroplastgenomes(Jansenetal.2007,Moore etal.2007),AmborellaandNymphaealesformedtwosuccessivelines,Chloranthaceaewerelinked withmagnoliids,andCeratophyllumwaslinkedwitheudicots,butastudyofmitochondrialgenes (Qiuetal.2010)linkedAmborellawithNymphaealesandCeratophyllumwithChloranthaceae.It isnotclearwhethertheseconflictsreflectbiasinoneortheothermoleculardatasetordifferent evolutionaryhistoriesofchloroplastsandmitochondria,owingtoancienthybridizationorlineage sorting(polymorphisminthecommonancestorandlossofdifferentcopiesinitsdescendants). However,an analysis ofslowlyevolving chloroplastgenes (Moore etal.2011), which wereex- pectedtobemorereliable,foundtheCeratophyllum-Chloranthaceaelink,whichmightindicate biasesinthewholechloroplastgenomedatasets. www.annualreviews.org • OriginofAngiosperms 307 EA40CH13-Doyle ARI 23March2012 14:10 These results provide an independent framework for the study of character evolution that helps overcome the problems of circularity and outgroup choice that plagued morphological analyses(Doyle&Endress2000,Zanisetal.2003,Endress&Doyle2009).Byplacingthreelow- diversitylinesbelowthebulkofangiosperms,theANITArootingpresentsanear-idealsituation forreconstructionofancestralstates.Usingparsimony,theancestralstateforsomecharactersis ambiguousowingtovariationamongtheANITAlines,suchaswhetherfloralpartswerearranged inaspiralorinwhorlsofthree,butmanyotherancestralstatesareclear.Thus,wecaninferthat themostrecentcommonancestorofangiospermshadvessellesswood,pinnatelyveinedsimple leaves(Doyle2007),monosulcatepollenwithcolumellarexinestructure(Doyle2005,2009),more thantwowhorlsorseriesofundifferentiatedperianthparts(tepals),numerousstamens,andmore thanoneascidiatecarpelcontainingasinglependentbitegmicovule(Figure3;termsdiscussed y. below)(Endress&Doyle2009).ThetwoarrangementsofAmborellaandNymphaealeshavelittle nl go impactontheseinferences. s.oruse TherelationoftheseresultstotheCretaceousrecordcanbeevaluatedbyoptimizingindividual viewonal charactersoffossilsonamoleculartreeorbyanalyzingadatasetthatincludesbothfossiland annualreFor pers lwivitinhgatdaaxtaa.sTethoefimdeoarlpahpoplroogaicchalmchigahratcbteerasftoortabloetvhidlievnincegaannadlyfosisssi(lHtaexramasnednm&oHleceunldarricchksar2a0c0te8r)s, w.2. for living taxa, but so far moststudies have used a molecular scaffold approach (Springer et al. w1 w1/ 2001),inwhichamorphologicaldatasetforlivingandfossiltaxaisanalyzedwiththearrangement om 05/2 oflivingtaxafixedtoabackbonetreebasedonmoleculardata(Eklundetal.2004,Doyleetal. d fron 2008,Friisetal.2009,Doyle&Endress2010,Friis&Pedersen2011).Thisseemsjustifiedon Downloadeomonosov trbhouebtugthsrteoesuennoadsussguthhmatpthtafiootsntshsilesshahodaudvliedtirobenelatoteifvstefeolydssfiinelswtwhceohufaulrdtaucprtreeo.rbsaabnldytnhoattamffoecsttmthoeletocpuolalrogreylaotfiolinvsihnigpstaaxrae, 26. of L Molecular results confirm that the stratigraphic order of appearance of angiosperm pollen 0:301-3Library tayppeerstucroerrsetastpeonisdsmtoonothsueilrcasteeq,uaesnicne tohfeevooldluetsitonrec(Dogonyilzeab2l0e0a5n,g2i0o0sp9e).rmThpeolilnefne.rrPerdioarnctoesttrhael ci. 2012.4Scientific ActietNsatlIreTaslA.aFnrdoosomsitliingpgho,tllaethnceowrneitftiohnrutehoheusasevtefeeceatxtuuimsrteesadnwldoonuggrldanbbueefloadrriefefixtchiuneletCtsotrreudtciastctueinroeguuswisewhrietfhrwooiumdteplbyoeliclnoegnnsroiedfceBorgeenndnizaeentd-- Earth Planet. Se University - (tosMhuuegsug,alaelnesrctreset1stit9chru7aal0tla,VteeDxaitloneayecnltgeusitmnertuiaacanrtluo.rrs1eee9ti7awct5uat,lshaWteceona-lcloukodmeleuremc&lolaenrlWln,aearacnlmtkdienoragnl1toAh9su8ous4ultc)gra.ohtHbestaohimlweeeyatvyaeelcenrts,uoammtnbodewlemaacssueslfoaaarrnriggtfririnoeoeasmplsleyitmrhmceposlno.ytrTitinghhuiain-st ev. Stat of angiosperms as thought. The continuous-tectate stage may be represented by Hauterivian Rw Annu. Mosco p20o0ll1e)n.withaverrucatetectumreminiscentofAmborella(Hughes1994;Doyle2001,2005;Hesse y Molecular trees imply that tricolpate pollen, the next major fossil type, evolved once from b monosulcateonthelinetoeudicots.Tricolporatepollenwasderivedfromtricolpateseveraltimes, asinferredfromthevariedsculptureoflateAlbiantricolporates(Doyle1969,Furnessetal.2007). Mostbasaleudicotsaretricolpate,butafewshowisolatedoriginsoftricolporatepollen(some Menispermaceae,Sabiaceae,Buxaceae).AmongPentapetalae,tricolpatepollenisretainedinmany SaxifragalesandCaryophyllales,butRosidaeandAsteridaearebasicallytricolporate.Triporate pollenwithgranularexinestructure,asinCenomanianNormapolles,evolvedfromtricolporate withinwind-pollinatedFagales(e.g.,Betulaceae,Juglandaceae)andinthewind-pollinatedsub- groupofRosalesthatwasformerlycalledUrticales(Doyle2009). SimilarcongruencecanbeseenwhencharactersofCretaceousleavesareplottedonmolecular phylogenies(Doyle2007).Theinferredancestralvenationwaspinnate,asinmostlowerPotomac 308 Doyle EA40CH13-Doyle ARI 23March2012 14:10 angiosperms,buttherewerethreeearlyoriginsofpalmatevenation,inNymphaeales,Piperales, andeudicots,consistentwiththepresenceofafewpalmatelyveinedleaftypesinthelowerPotomac andtheirincreasingdiversityintheupperPotomac.Upchurch(1984)notedthatstomatalpatterns inlowerPotomacleavesweremostlikethoseinAmborellaandAustrobaileyales,15yearsbefore thesetaxawererecognizedasbasal. Most phylogenetic analyses of Early Cretaceous angiosperms (see Figure 3) have involved fossilflowers.Someofthebest-studiedlocalities,fromPortugal,wereoriginallythoughttobeas oldasValanginian,butmorerecentcorrelationsimplythatmostofthemarelateearlyAlbian, withTorresVedrasprobablybeingolder(seeSupplementalSection1;followtheSupplemental MaterialslinkfromtheAnnualReviewshomepageathttp://www.annualreviews.org).Original descriptions of taxa that have been analyzed phylogenetically are referenced in Supplemental y. Section2.Mostofthesefossilsappeartobelongonthestemlineagesoflivingfamiliesorlarger nl go clades(seeSupplementalSection3). s.oruse PhylogeneticanalysesshowbetterevidenceforMagnoliidaeandotherbasalgroups,beginning viewonal beforeandcontinuingalongsidetheradiationofeudicots.Doyle&Endress(2010)confirmedand annualreFor pers mreafinnieadn)cowmithpaMrisaognnsoolifaElens,drVeisrsigniinaia(nlattheuAs(pmtiiadnd,lBerAazlbili)aann)dwAitrhchbaaesaanltLhuausr(laalteesAanlbdiaMn–aeualdrliyniCae(lnaote- w.2. Albian–early Cenomanian) with Lauraceae and Hernandiaceae, and Walkeripollis pollen tetrads w1 w1/ (lateBarremian–earlyAptian)withWinteraceae.MonocotsarerepresentedfromtheAptianon- om 05/2 wardbyLiliaciditespollen,withdiagnosticgradedsculpture(Doyle1973,Walker&Walker1984, d fron Doyleetal.2008);byAcaciaephyllum,aleafystemwhoseassignmenttomonocotswasquestioned Downloadeomonosov bnthyeeaGrA-abNnadIsToallAfmogoertnaaodlce.o:(2tM0fa0omn0e)itlbiyaunAttrchaoucnsefi(aeream(rFleyrdiAibslybeDitaanol).y2lien0e1Nt0ayblm)..(pA2h0ta0lee8aa)c;setaantewdo(bFyflrioiinwsfleeotrrsaelas.rc2ee0ns0ec9ceu)srraeenlldyatpAeldnacatoecodtsthiinea 26. of L (early-middleAlbian)inAustrobaileyales(Doyleetal.2008).OtherprobableNymphaealesare 0:301-3Library PJolurdriacnar(pTelalaytlioarfertoaml.t2h0e08la).te Aptian of Brazil (Mohr et al. 2008) and leaves from the Albian of ci. 2012.4Scientific aenuddDicpooaytlmlelian&teesEl:ynpldeorlbetaestsde(2aln0ead1v0ep)sianlansnoadtceoflyrnufidirtismssoeefdctNaefdefilnuleimtaivbeeistseos(fpwmlaiittdhadnNloeiedaluns,mdSblaaot,peihnAedalobdpissaisno)ftwauxitnahiwsPeitxlhautatalrniflcuoso,lwpaaentrdes Earth Planet. Se University - AtCuhnlrebiesitteaarxnciuc-eCoaolluepSsnoporNaamntooearmnmpieaoranalploeflbnloolewutsyneppdreosaslrwlyetihnt(haBttaBosbuiFenxgagaigcenaerlate&eos.ipDTsrhiowlecleihffilelerrresats1ttefl9ao8binr4lia)sl,thhebeevuditdlbaettyhneecaAyesslmfobociaraiyanPt.bieoTennthraeweppeirrttheealslaaeftoenisotisesnidlnofleafoamrLwotaenhtrgees ev. Stat (Friis1984,Friisetal.2006b). Rw Annu. Mosco lumFiofstshilessreefloatremdtaoctlhadeen)oawre-orbemscuarrkeafbalmyiclyonCshpliocuraonutshianceeaaerl(yoranCghiolospraenrmthaflcoeraaesp.lTuhseCseeraintocplhuydle- y monosulcatepollenwithcharacteristicsculptureandathicknexine(Clavatipollenites,Asteropollis, b Pennipollis: Doyle 1969, Walker & Walker 1984, Doyle et al. 2008), leaves with chloranthoid teethandstomata(Upchurch1984),andextremelysimpleflowerswithsingleuniovulatecarpels (Pedersenetal.1991,Friisetal.2000,Eklundetal.2004).SomehavesuggestedthatChloran- thaceae offer an alternative prototype for the angiosperm flower (Nixon et al. 1994, Taylor & Hickey1996),butthisconflictswithmoleculardata,whichplacethefamilysecurelyinthemesan- giosperms,implyingthattheirfloralsimplicityisaresultofreduction(Endress&Doyle2009). Thisviewisconsistentwiththecoevalexistenceofmorecomplexflowersandisfurthersupported by Canrightia (Friis & Pedersen 2011), which resembled Chloranthaceae and Ceratophyllum in havingoneorthotropousovulepercarpelbutretainedbisexualflowerswithseveraltepals,sta- mens,andcarpels.AlthoughChloranthaceaemaynotbeakeytotheoriginofangiosperms,they www.annualreviews.org • OriginofAngiosperms 309 EA40CH13-Doyle ARI 23March2012 14:10 aresignificantasthefirstcommonangiosperms,whichbearsonecologicalcausesfortheriseof thegroup(Feildetal.2004,Feild&Arens2007). SimilardiscussionwasstimulatedbythefindingthatHydatellaceae,minuteaquaticplantswith linearleavesthatwereassumedtobemonocots,areinsteadabasalbranchofNymphaeales(Saarela et al. 2007). Their reproductive structures have been interpreted as inflorescences of unisexual flowers consisting of one stamen or one carpel, but Rudall et al. (2009) suggested instead that theyrepresentanonfloralorprefloralstate.However,thephylogeneticpositionofHydatellaceae impliesthattheirflowersarereduced(Endress&Doyle2009). ArelatedcaseisArchaefructus,anaquaticplantwithfinelydissectedleavesandreproductive axesbearingsingleorpairedstamensandcarpels,fromtheYixianlakebedsofnortheastChina (Sun et al. 1998, 2002). Archaefructus was first reported as the oldest known angiosperm (Sun y. etal.1998),becausetheYixianwasthoughttobeLateJurassic,butthebedshavebeenredated nl go radiometricallyasBarremianorAptian(Zhouetal.2003).AcladisticanalysisbySunetal.(2002) s.oruse placed Archaefructus below all living angiosperms, which led them to suggest that it illustrates viewonal a prefloral stage before the perianth, stamens, and carpels were grouped into typical flowers. annualreFor pers Hthoatwtehveerr,eFprroiidsuecttailv.e(2a0x0es3)wceitreedinthfleorfaecstcethnactesthoefsrteadmuecnedsaunndisceaxrupaellsflaorweeorfst.eTnhineypaailrssoansoetveiddetnhcaet w.2. the ternate pattern of leaf dissection resembles that of Vitiphyllum in the lower Potomac and w1 w1/ Ranunculalesintheeudicots.PhylogeneticanalysesbyDoyle(2008)andEndress&Doyle(2009) om 05/2 nestedArchaefructusintheangiospermcrowngroupwithoneoftwotaxathathaveevensimpler d fron flowers,dependingonthebackbonetree:Ceratophyllum,ifthisplantislinkedwitheudicots,or Downloadeomonosov Hppooylldlleeannt,eglblrauacitneFase.ri.IifsTpehotelalseel.nr(ec2hs0ua0lr3tas)cdqteeurpesesotnifdoAnoerncdhtawhehefreudtchetseucrsraitphreteiosrcneomoreafdiAnasrscfihuganeukfrrneuodctwubnsy,aSistushnmaveoitnsatglp.ma(2ros0ni0mo2so)unwlicoeaurtees 26. of L positionisinRanunculales(Endress&Doyle2009).Underanyofthesehypotheses,Archaefructus 0:301-3Library istoTohfeasrefraonmd oththeebrafsoesosiflsthweitahngeiuodspiceortm-lsikteofheaavteuraesmpaojosreipmrpoabcletmonsifnofrerthreedcaonncgersutreanlcsetaotefst.he ci. 2012.4Scientific la2es0as0of,6c,piaSotulelndenew,tiaatnhl.d2eu0fl1do1iwc)oe.rtV-rliitekicpeohyrfodlluus.rm-ToahncecduYfirisvxweia-inctahFrtpoherelmloaatltedieofsrntutiartlsisco(oSlciponanotcetaarpipnouslsl,esinLmeipneflretuhacetnuPdso:ttLeoremnnaagtce&(DleFoarvyieliess Earth Planet. Se University - &2Ab0up0tHti6oai)nnc,klbyoeuyfitsAo1thl9fare7tice6Yad,ixHapinariednc-kiASesoylBbu&aitarhnrDeAtmormiyicaleoenrlip1oca9art7eA(7Dgp),rtoiaayaitlnnea.sT1lae9rrve9iec2klo,ntlBphoaawrtetnenispninoperlrEloe1ubn9rao9obp6cly,ecuH(erHaseruiilmnigehthshteoesAfe1llarb9ti&9eas4nt)H,B(Haoanrcodrhceuhnmluoiilra2itnh0e1etaa0nas)dlt,. ev. Stat China was at a higher paleolatitude, where tricolpates generally appeared later (Brenner 1976, Rw Annu. Mosco Hpoilclkeenyin&thDeoAypletia1n97o7f,ACrgraennetin&a(LAirdcghaarndg1e9ls8k9y).etTael.rn2a0t0e9ly,Ploubeebdlal2ea0v0e9s).aOlsoneppreodssaitbeiltirtiycoislpthataet y someoralloftheseleavesarenoteudicots,butratherextinctlinesofNymphaeales,asproposed b forArchaefructus.Anotheristhattheyrepresenttaxaontheeudicotstemlineage,beforetheorigin oftricolpatepollen.ParsimonyanalysisimpliesthatdissectedleavesarosewithinRanunculales (Doyle2007),butaccordingtolikelihoodanalysis(Geetaetal.2012)theyprobablyalreadyexisted intheancestorofeudicots.Alternatively,itmaybethattricolpatepollenoccursintheYixianand Argentina but is rare because the first eudicots were low pollen producers. Wang et al. (2000) reported“prototricolpate”pollenfromtheYixian,butitisnotclearthatthesegrainshavethree colpi;atleastone(figure21ofWangetal.2000)maybeacrushedgrainoftheconiferClassopollis. An important result of molecular studies concerns the original morphology of the carpel (Figure 3). The ANITA rooting refutes the older view that the ancestral carpel was plicate (conduplicate),likealeaffoldeddownthemiddleandsealedbyfusionofthemargins,asinsome 310 Doyle
Description: