ebook img

Module Theory: Papers and Problems from The Special Session Sponsored by The American Mathematical Society at The University of Washington Proceedings, Seattle, August 15–18, 1977 PDF

243 Pages·1979·2.26 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Module Theory: Papers and Problems from The Special Session Sponsored by The American Mathematical Society at The University of Washington Proceedings, Seattle, August 15–18, 1977

Lecture Notes ni Mathematics Edited yb .A Dold dna .B nnamkcE 700 Module Theory srepaP dna Problems from ehT Special Session Sponsored yb ehT American Mathematical Society ta ehT University of Washington ,sgnideecorP Seattle, August 15-18, 7791 Edited yb Carl Faith dna Sylvia Wiegand galreV-regnirpS Berlin Heidelberg New kroY 1979 Editors Carl Faith Department of Mathematics Rutgers, The State University New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903/USA aivlyS dnageiW tnemtrapeD scit faomehtaM ytisrevinU a fkosarbeN ,nlocniL aksarbeN ASU/88586 .z~ @ .taC ,21 9791 .ZRM AMS Subject Classifications (1970): 13A15,13 B 20,13 B99,13 C10,13 C15, 13D05, 13F05, 13F15, 13F20, 13H10, 16A08, 16A34, 16A52, 16A62, 16A64, 16A66, 18G XX. ISBN 3-540-09107-6 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New¥ork ISBN 0-387-09107-6 Springer-Verlag NewYork Heidelberg Berlin This work All is subject to rights copyright. era whole the whether or reserved, reprinting, specifically those of translation, is concerned, of the part material reproduction of broadcasting, re-use illustrations, yb or photocopying machine similar means, dna storage ni data § Under 54 Copyright banks. of the German waL where copies era to the fee is a payable use, for than private other made to fee the of amount the publisher, eb determined yb publisher. the with agreement © yb Berlin Springer-Verlag Heidelberg 9791 Printed ni Germany Printing dna binding: Offsetdruck, Beltz Hemsbach/Bergstr. 012345-0413/1412 I" am going ot hang up the gloves next year" (Nathan Jacobson) DEDICA TION The contributors and particpants of the Special Session dedicate this volume ot Nathan Jacobson ni admiration , and gratitude for showing us what ot do in the ring (theory). PREFACE The editors wish to thank the participants and contributors for their splendid cooperation, and for their joe de vvre which made the Special Session so much fun. The senior editor has grouped the contributed papers along ideological lines whenever possible, although, like much ideology, these are far-fetched in many cases. tI therefore would serve no useful purpose ot expose this here, but the reading si certainly better served this way than the old ABC way. One ought to mention that Dr. J.T. Stafford appeared first ni the program, as a guest of the Society introduced by the senior editor, and that Dr. Warfeld' s paper just has to follow Stafford' s . Et cetera. LIST OF PARTICIPANTS AND CONTRIBUTORS G. Azumaya .S Mohamed Indiana University Kuwait University Bloomington, IN 47401 Kuwait J. Beaehy .B .L Osofsky Northern Illinois Univ. Rutgers University DeKalb, IL 60115 New Brunswick, NJ 08903 A. .K Boyle .Z Papp University of Wisconsin George Mason University Milwaukee, WI 53706 Fairfax, VA 22030 .V Camillo X. Smith University of Iowa University of Texas lowa City, IA 52240 Austin, TX 78712 C. Faith J. T. Stafford Rutgers University Brandeis University New Brunswick, NJ 08903 Waltham, HA 02154 K. R. Fuller M. .L Teply University of lowa University of Florida Iowa City, IA 52240 Gainesville, FL 32611 F. Hansen R. Warfield, Jr. Universit~t Bochum University of Washington D - 4630 Boehum Seattle, WA 98195 M. Hochster R. Wiegand University of Michigan University of Nebraska Ann Arbor, MI 48109 Lincoln, NB 68588 L. S. Levy .S Wiegand University of Wisconsin University of Nebraska Madison, WI 53706 Lincoln, NB 68588 E. Matlis Northwestern University Evanston, IL 60201 TABLE OF CONTENTS Papers J. Toby STAFFORD: Cancellation for Nonprojective Modules ..... 3 Robert B. WARFIELD, Jr.: Stable Generation of Modules ........ 16 Goro AZUMAYA: Some Aspects of Fuller's Theorem ............... 34 John A BEACHY: On Inversive Localization ..................... 46 Ann K. BOYLE and Edmund H. FELLER : Semicritical Modules and k-Primitive Rings. 57 K.R. FULLER and. A Note on Loewy Rings and Chain Conditions V.P. CAMILLO on Primitive Ideals ........................ 75 Saad MOHAMED and Bruno J. FfOLLER : Decompositions of Dual-Continuous Modules .. 87 Friedhelm HANSEN and On the Gabriel Dimension and Sub- Mark L. TEPLY : idealizer Rings ....................... 95 Melvin HOCHSTER: Big and Small Cohen-Macaulay Modules ........ 119 Roger WIEGAND: Rings of Bounded Module Type .................. 143 Carl FAITH: Injective Quotient Rings of Commutative Rings .... 151 Zoltan PAPP: Spectrum, Topologies and Sheaves for Left Noetherian Rings ................................ 204 Problems John BEACHY: Fully left bounded left Noetherian rings ........ 217 Carl FAITH: Bounded prime rings, pseudo-Frobenius rings, the Jacobson radical of a ring ....................... 218 Melvin HOCHSTER: Commutative Noetherian local rings .......... 224 Saad MOHAMED: Continuous and dual-continuous modules ......... 226 Zoltan PAPP: Left stable left Noetherian rings ............... 228 × Martha SMITH: Finitely generated algebras over a field ....... 229 J. Toby STAFFORD: Simple Noetherian rings .................... 230 Mark TEPLY: Subidealizers .................................... 232 Robert B. WARFIELD~ Jr.: Equivalence of matrices~ prime rings~ number of generators~ stable spaces . 235 PA PE RA CANCELLATION FOR NONPROJECTIVE MODULES J. T. Stafford Brandeis University Waltham, Massachusetts 02154 In 7 Serre showed that, given a commutative Noetherian ring R and a projective, finitely generated R-module M with f - rk(M) ~ dim(max(R)) + ,i then M ~ M' ~R. When Bass considered this result in I, he was able to remove the projectivity condition. He was further able to show that~ if M ~ R ~ N • R, then M ~ N. However for this cancellation theorem he still had to require that M had a "large" projective direct summand. Thus the obvious question remains as to whether this second result still holds without the projectivity condition. In this paper we answer this question affirmatively. This comes as a corollary of the main results of this paper~ where we prove that the above two theorems hold for modules over fully bounded J-Noetherian rings. Of course, to do this we need a definition of rank that requires no localization. For this purpose we use the r - rk of 8 (which for a finitely generated module over a commutative Noetherian ring is equivalent to f - rk). In fact the proofs given here closely follow those given in 8, where versions of the above two theorems were proved for noncommuta- tive Noetherian rings. However the results given there used~ for the di- mension on the ring, the Krull dimension of Rentschler and Gabriel 6, which, of course, is in general larger than dim(max(R)). However it was claimed that the methods used in 8 would answer the question posed above~ and this paper can be considered as a substantiation of that assertion. Throughout this paper all rings will contain an identity and all modules will be unitary. ~i. Notation and Preliminary Results. The results of this paper hold for a more general class of rings than Noetherian rings and we start by defining that class. The notation comes from 3. Let R be a ring and I an ideal of R. Then I is call~d a J-ideal (respectively a J-prime) if I is an ideal (respectively a prime ideal) that is the intersection of the maximal ideals containing it. The ring is called J-Noetherian if it has the ascending chain condition on J-ideals. Define J-dim R to be the maximal length n of chains of J-primes, Jo ~ Jl ~ "'" ~Jn ~ R. If R is commutative then these concepts coincide with the ones used by Bass. In particular, R is J-Noetherian if and only if the max spectrum of R is Noetherian, in which case J-dim R = dim(max(R)). As mentioned in the introduction, we will prove the results of this paper for more than just commutative rings. Define a prime ring R to be left bounded if any essential left ideal contains a non-zero ideal. Define a ring R to be fully left bounded Goldie if every prime factor ring is left bounded and left Goldie. For example, commutative rings, PI rings, and FBN rings are fully left bounded Goldie. One of the crutial facts that we need about these rings is the following.

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.