Curtin Business School School of Information Systems Modeling end-user adoption of e-government services in Abu Dhabi Eltahir Fadul Kabbar This thesis is presented for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy of Curtin University July 2016 Declaration To the best of my knowledge and belief, this thesis contains no material previously published by any other person except where due acknowledgment has been made. This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any university. The research presented and reported in this thesis was conducted in accordance with the National Health and Medical Research Council National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research (2007) – updated March 2014. The proposed research study received human research ethics approval from the Curtin University Human Research Ethics Committee (EC00262), Approval Number IS_10_15 (20 October 2010) and IS_14_06 (24 February 2014). Signature: …………………………………………. Date: …11/07/2016……………………... i Abstract A number of recent reports indicate that several governments around the world are increasingly using internet technologies to provide public services. These services range from providing the most basic informational website to deploying smart government services using sophisticated tools for managing interactions between government agencies and beyond government. This has resulted in the development of many e-government initiatives that aim to enhance the delivery of government services to citizens and improve interactions with business and industry. The e- government initiatives in various countries have focused on replacing their traditional government services with ‘online’ alternatives. To accomplish this, governments have spent a lot of money to create the technology infrastructure required to enable end- users to access a variety of online services. A number of studies have examined the supply-side of e-government; however, it is evident from the available literature that very few researchers have investigated the demand for e-government services from the perspective of the end-users. Further, the literature on technology adoption indicates that the perceptions and attitudes of potential adopters’ regarding new innovations are critical to the successful acceptance of these innovations. The aim of this research project is to examine the factors that influence the uptake of e-government services by end-users in Abu Dhabi. This project was completed in two phases. In the first phase, the researcher used a qualitative approach to collect data from the study participants using two rounds of semi-structured interviews. A sample of Abu Dhabi residents were interviewed in order to determine the critical factors that influence their use (or lack of use) of e- government services. Drawing on existing technology adoption literature and models (such as DOI, TAM & UTAUT) and the findings from the qualitative phase, a theoretical model that summarizes the six domains that emerged as a result of using the qualitative research approach, as well as the relationships between these domains, ii was developed. The discovered domains were: Perceived Online Safety, Online Experiences, Individual Significant Others, Motivations, Trust and Intention to Use. The second phase of the study used a quantitative research method to assess the study hypotheses formulated after completing the qualitative phase. During the quantitative phase, a survey instrument was developed, tested and validated before it was used to collect data from a cross-sectional sample of Abu Dhabi residents. The quantitative data was then analyzed using Structural Equation Modelling techniques. The results obtained confirmed that Online Experiences and Individual Significant Others are significant factors in predicting end-users’ acceptance of e-government, explaining 54% of the variance. The results also indicate that Trust is not a significant factor, contrary to findings in prior literature. Finally, by providing insights into end-users’ perceptions of e-government services, the findings of this study contribute to the literature on e-government adoption which has hitherto been limited, especially in a non-western context. The study also contributes a “grassroots” and validated e-government adoption model. The findings of this study will be useful to both e-government researchers and practitioners interested in promoting e-government. iii Acknowledgments I would like to express my thanks and appreciation to many people without whom this thesis would have not been what it is. First and foremost I would like to thank my wife, Selma Abdallah Khalied, for her unconditional love, patience, support, and encouragement. Without her support, I would not be where I am today. I would like also to extend my thanks to my parents Fadul Kabbar and Fathia Altahir and to my children Lena, Ahmad, Anas, Ayah and Ameen for their love and invaluable support. I owe a debt of gratitude to my supervisor and mentor, Prof. Peter Dell, for his guidance, help, support, and for the freedom he gave me to find my own path. Peter is an outstanding teacher and supervisor whose deep knowledge, patience, words of wisdom and positive criticism helped me complete this study. Peter, I am grateful for the encouragement, dedication and moral support that you provided me from the very beginning of this project and throughout this incredible journey during which I learnt so many things. I thoroughly enjoyed the countless number of meetings that we had over the past few years. My thanks and appreciation also goes to my thesis committee, Prof. Heinz Dreher (Chairperson of the committee) and Associate Prof. John Venable (co-supervisor), from the School of Information Systems at Curtin University, for their help and guidance especially during the candidacy phase of this project. I would like to thank the Higher Colleges of Technology (HCT), UAE, for providing the financial support that enabled me to present a part of Chapter Two of this study at an international conference. I would like to extend my thanks to all of my colleagues at HCT for their moral support. Finally, I also extend my sincere gratitude and appreciation to the study participants, from whom I learnt so many things; unfortunately, they cannot be named but they know who they are. iv Table of Contents Declaration ..................................................................................................................... i Abstract ......................................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgments ......................................................................................................... iv Table of Contents ........................................................................................................... v List of Figures ............................................................................................................... viii List of Tables .................................................................................................................. x List of Appendices ......................................................................................................... xi 1. CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION ............................................................................... 1 1.1 Study Objectives ................................................................................................ 1 1.2 The Study Location ............................................................................................ 3 1.3 Thesis Structure ................................................................................................. 4 2. CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW ....................................................................... 7 2.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Theoretical Frameworks Review ....................................................................... 9 2.2.1 Diffusion of Innovation Theory (DOI) .............................................................. 10 2.2.2 Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) and Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) ... 19 2.2.3 Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) ............................................................ 24 2.2.4 The Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) ................................................................... 28 2.2.5 The Motivational Model (MM) ........................................................................ 33 2.2.6 The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) .............. 35 2.3 E-government adoption literature review ...................................................... 42 2.3.1 Application of UTAUT in e-government context ............................................. 42 2.3.2 Other models of e-government adoption ....................................................... 46 2.4 Conclusion ....................................................................................................... 50 3. CHAPTER THREE: RESEARCH METHODS .................................................................. 53 3.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 53 3.2 Research Aim and Objectives .......................................................................... 53 3.3 Research Significance ...................................................................................... 54 v 3.4 Research Questions ......................................................................................... 54 3.5 Research Approach .......................................................................................... 55 3.5.1 Mixed Methods Research ................................................................................ 55 3.5.2 Qualitative Phase ............................................................................................. 62 3.5.3 Quantitative Phase .......................................................................................... 70 3.6 Ethical Considerations ..................................................................................... 85 3.6.1 Informed Consent ............................................................................................ 85 3.6.2 Confidentiality and Anonymity ........................................................................ 86 4. CHAPTER FOUR: QUALITATIVE PHASE .................................................................... 88 4.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 88 4.2 The Interview Process ...................................................................................... 88 4.3 Analytical Method Used .................................................................................. 92 4.4 Findings and Discussion ................................................................................... 96 4.4.1 The Interviewees ............................................................................................. 96 4.4.2 Identification of e-government Adoption-related Topics ............................... 98 4.5 Summary ........................................................................................................ 127 5 CHAPTER FIVE: QUANTITATIVE PHASE ................................................................. 129 5.1 Introduction ................................................................................................... 129 5.2 The Hypothetico-Deductive Process ............................................................. 130 5.3 The Theoretical Research Model ................................................................... 131 5.3.1 The Study Constructs ..................................................................................... 132 5.3.2 Research Hypotheses .................................................................................... 139 5.3.3 Controls ......................................................................................................... 147 5.4 Instrument Development .............................................................................. 147 5.5 The Sample .................................................................................................... 149 5.6 Screening the Dataset.................................................................................... 153 5.6.1 Missing Data .................................................................................................. 154 5.6.2 Outliers .......................................................................................................... 154 5.6.3 Normality of Data .......................................................................................... 155 5.7 Data Analysis and Results .............................................................................. 156 5.7.1 Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) ............................................................ 157 vi 5.7.2 Results of Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) ................................................. 158 5.7.3 Cluster Analysis .............................................................................................. 166 5.7.4 Results of Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) .............................................. 170 5.8 The Structural Models ................................................................................... 176 5.8.1 Hypotheses Testing Results ........................................................................... 179 5.9 Chapter Summary .......................................................................................... 182 6 CHAPTER SIX: DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS .................................................... 183 6.1 Introduction ................................................................................................... 183 6.2 Revisiting the Research Questions ................................................................ 183 6.2.1 RQ1: What are end-users’ perceptions of electronic interaction with government agencies? .................................................................................. 184 6.2.2 RQ2: What makes end-users decide to use or not to use e-government services? ................................................................................ 186 6.2.3 RQ3: What are the relationships between the factors affecting e-government adoption? ....................................................................................................... 195 6.2.4 RQ4: What are the similarities and/or differences between the factors influencing UAE nationals and expats adoption of e-government services? 196 6.3 The Study Contributions and Recommendations .......................................... 197 6.3.1 Methodological and Empirical Contribution ................................................. 197 6.3.2 Theoretical and Practical Contributions ........................................................ 199 6.4 Limitations and Future Research ................................................................... 202 6.4.1 Study Limitations ........................................................................................... 202 6.4.2 Direction for Future Research ....................................................................... 203 6.5 Summary ........................................................................................................ 204 References ................................................................................................................. 206 Appendices ................................................................................................................ 220 vii List of Figures Figure 2-1: A model of Five Stages in the Innovation-Decision Process (Rogers, 2003) ................................................................................. 12 Figure 2-2: Adopter categorization based on innovativeness (Rogers, 2003) ................. 16 Figure 2-3: Diffusion Process (Rogers, 2003). .................................................................. 18 Figure 2-4 Factors determining a person’s behaviour (Ajzen and Fishbein, 1980, p8) ..................................................................... 20 Figure 2-5 Theory of Planned Behaviour ......................................................................... 21 Figure 2-6: TAM (Davis et al., 1989) ................................................................................. 25 Figure 2-7: TAM2 (Venkatesh & Davis, 2000 p.188). ....................................................... 27 Figure 2-8: Bandura's SCT ................................................................................................ 29 Figure 2-9: The Model of PC Utilization. Thompson et al. (1991) ................................... 32 Figure 2-10: Extended Model of PC Utilization (MPCU). Thompson et al. (1994) .......... 32 Figure 2-11: Types of Motivations. Deci and Ryan (2000b, p. 72) ................................... 35 Figure 2-12: UTAUT model. Source: Venkatesh et al. (2003) .......................................... 37 Figure 2-13 : UTAUT2 Venkatesh et al. (2012) ................................................................. 41 Figure 2-14: eGAM Model by Shareef et al. (2011). ........................................................ 47 Figure 2-15: E-government adoption model in Pakistan (Rehman et al. 2012) .............. 50 Figure 3-1: Mixed Methods. Johnson et al. (2007, p. 124) .............................................. 57 Figure 3-2: Classification of the different types of mixed-methods research designs. ... 59 Figure 3-3: Flowchart of the basic Procedures in implementing an exploratory design. Creswell and Plano (2011, p. 88) ..................................................... 60 Figure 3-4: Summary of the Research Approach Adopted .............................................. 61 Figure 3-5: Outcomes from Omitted Validities (from Straub, 1989 p. 152). ................... 76 Figure 3-6: Questions Answered by the Validities (Straub 1989, p.150). ........................ 77 Figure 4-1: Qualitative data analysis approach. .............................................................. 94 Figure 4-2: Taxonomic Analysis of e-government Adoption ......................................... 121 Figure 4-3: Domain-Relationships Model ...................................................................... 126 viii Figure 5-1: Research Theoretical Framework ................................................................ 134 Figure 5-2: Sample Gender and Citizenship Distribution ............................................... 152 Figure 5-3: Sample Age group distribution .................................................................... 152 Figure 5-4: Sample Educational Attainment Distribution. ............................................. 153 Figure 5-5: Normal P-P Plot of Regression Standardized Residual ................................ 155 Figure 5-6: Six-Stage Process for Structural Equation Modeling. .................................. 159 Figure 5-7: Cluster Analysis Models Summary and Cluster Sizes. ................................. 168 Figure 5-8: Cluster Comparison. .................................................................................... 168 Figure 5-9: Scatter Diagram of ITU vs. MOT and TRU. ................................................... 169 Figure 5-10: CFA measurement theory model for E-government Adoption. ................ 172 Figure 5-11: Scatterplot diagrams using Regression Standardized Residual of the study constructs ................................................................................... 178 Figure 5-12: Structural Model with hypotheses test results depicted on paths ........... 181 Figure 6-1 Model of the Significant Factors Affecting ITU ............................................. 186 ix
Description: