Preface To date no antibacterial compounds identified by target based screening have advanced into clinical testing much less been used clinically to treat bacterial infections. This well-noted futility has led some to suggest that this approach willneverproveproductive,thatthemajorityof“novel”targetsarenot“drugg- able,”andthatindustryresearchdollarsarebetterspentelsewhere.Afterall,even the most stubborn of bacterial infections rarely, if ever, require more than six months of treatment, and the average course of therapy is under seven days. It hasbeenreasonedthatitmakesmorecommercialsensetotreatchronicconditions requiringyearsoftherapyratherthancuringdiseaseswithshortcoursesoftreat- ment.Theuseofthispharmaceuticalindustrycalculushaslongbeentherationale used for the chronic underresourcing of antibacterial research programs (not to mentionanemicpublicfundingforthestudyofpathogenicbacteriaandantibacte- rial drug resistance) but this actually flies in the face of commercial and public health realities. Not only are infectious disease therapeutics the second largest source of revenue for pharmaceutical companies (behind cardiovascular drugs), with antibacterial drugstaking the lion’s share,but there are also nofewer than six branded products garnering over $1 billion annually, despite fierce generic competition.Nootherareaoftherapeuticfocuscanboastthislevelofcommercial, not to mention therapeutic success. Thereislessargumentontheneedfornewantibacterialagentsandthera- peutic strategiesto avoidthe emergenceand disseminationof resistantbacteria. Partandparceloftheresistanceproblemaredramaticallychangingdemographics iii iv Preface consistingofanagingpopulationwithadeclineintherobustresponsetoinfec- tions.Thishasproducedapopulationthatisbecomingincreasinglyimmunosup- pressed.Indevelopingcountriesperiodicmalnutrition,poorsanitation,thespread ofHIVinfection,and,almostparadoxically,increasingpopulationdensity,cou- pled with the ready availability of cheap, generic antibacterials (often of poor quality), are leading to a mushrooming of resistant bacterial strains. In sum, bacterial diseasesin general, andantibiotic-resistant bacterialinfections specifi- cally,areincreasinginbothdevelopinganddevelopedcountries.Ironically,even improvedtherapiesforotherdiseasesarecontributingtoanincreaseininfectious diseases, e.g. immune suppressive therapies in transplant patients, aggressive chemotherapeutic practices in oncology, and most recently the use of TNF-(cid:1) antagonistsintreatingrheumatoidarthritis.Alongwiththisincreasedsusceptibil- itytoinfection,ithasbeenwelldocumentedthatanumberofpathogens,including Streptococcuspneumoniae,Staphylococcusaureus,andMycobacteriumtubercu- losis,havedevelopedresistancetoarangeofantimicrobialsatanalarmingrate. Yet despite the well-documented commercial opportunity and the clear unmet medical need many large pharmaceutical companies are withdrawing from this field.Contributingtothediminishinginterestistheperceivedinabilityoftarget- based screening to produce commercially successful antibacterials. Some in the industry are now convinced that this approach was doomed from the start. This is reminiscentof prevailing public and scientific opinionprior to the firstsuccessfuldemonstrationofpoweredflightbytheWrightbrothers.Priorto theirsuccessatKittyHawkthereweremanywell-documentedattemptsatpow- eredflightthatliterallycrashedandburned.WhydidOrvilleandWilburWright succeed where so many others had so visibly, repeatedly—and at times tragi- cally—failed?Threereasonsareprominent:(1)expertise:especially(asbicycle builders)intheuseofdurable,lightweightmaterials,andtheabilitytolearnfrom thefailuresoftheircompetitors,(2)resources:theWrightshadadequate,although not copious, financial backing, and (3) a sensitive assay: the Wrights used the winds of Kitty Hawk to produce additional lift and built what was essentially a glider with an engine. A fourth reason is persistence: they were undeterred by thefailureofothers,patientlyworkinginasystematicfashiontosolveproblems. Anotherimportantpointtoconsiderintarget-basedscreeningforantibacte- rialagentsisthat,inthepursuitofbroad-spectrumagents,thegoalisnotanew molecular entity that is a potent inhibitor of a single molecular target. Rather, we aresearching for inhibitors ofa family ofrelated but not identicaltargets in a wide range of pathogenic bacteria. Several groups have been successful at identifying narrow-spectrum inhibitors with excellent in vitro potency and even efficacyinanimalmodelsofinfection.Butsuchnarrow-spectrumagentsarenot considered commercially or therapeutically viable because the vast majority of therapeutic applications involve empiric therapy (where an antibacterial drug is administereduponpresentationofsymptomsbutpriortotheidentificationofthe Preface v The Wright Brothers Memorial in Kitty Hawk, N.C. The reconstructed hangerandcampbuildingisattheleftcenter.Inthedistance,thegraniteMemorial Pylon,completedin1932,sitsatopKillDevilHill.Thewalkwaytotherighthas four stone markers, representing the distances of the four flights made on Dec. 17,1903.Thefourthmarker,representingthelongestflightof852feet,isatthe far right of the photograph. The inscription on the Memorial Pylon reads: IN COMMEMORATION OF THE CONQUEST OF THE AIR BY THE BROTHERS WILBUR AND ORVILLE WRIGHT CONCEIVED BY GENIUS, ACHIEVED BY DAUNTLESS RESOLUTION AND UNCONQUERABLE FAITH infectiousagent).Thiswillbethefocusofmostantibacterialdiscoveryprograms unlessanduntilrapid(read“bedside”)diagnosticsbecomewidelyavailable.Even then, the enormous expense to bring a drug to market (currently estimated at $700–800million)makesanarrow-spectrumagentadifficultcommercialpropo- sition. Therefore the assumption made here is that goal of antibacterial drug discovery is a novel class of broad-spectrum agent so the themes of the target classes below are, for the most part, those that are generally well conserved (genetically and structurally) among pathogenic bacteria. vi Preface Thenotionthatthemereidentificationofnewtargetswouldquicklyresult in a flood of novel antibiotics was naive. The rapid delivery of the genomic sequencesofpathogenicbacteriaoverthepasteightyearsraisedtheexpectation that a large number of new targets for therapy would be identified. Indeed, a number of groups have done precisely that using a variety of clever strategies. Genomictargetidentificationcertainlyhasresultedinamorerationalandacceler- atedprocessinantibiotictargetscreening.Italsosuggestedseveralnewwaysto return to cell-based antimicrobial screens in a targeted approach with increased sensitivitytoinhibitors.However,thebottleneckhasshiftedfromtargetidentifi- cation to the process of identifying inhibitors that have the potential to become leads, that is, to be modified to drug-like characteristics. This is a difficult and empiricprocess,involvingthebalanceofcontinuedorimprovedtargetinhibition withinstillingtheproperpharmacologicalpropertiesandlackofhumantoxicity inthecandidatemolecule.Thegenomics-approachgoalistodeliveranincreasing numberofantibacterialinhibitorsagainstabroaderrangeoftargetsintheexpecta- tionthatasmallsubsetofthesemoleculeswillindeedbeamenabletotheneces- sary pharmacological modifications for safe and effective use as antibiotics. Inthisbook,abroadrangeofgenomics-basedapproachestotheproblemof identifyingnovelantibioticclassesarepresented.Thechaptersfocusondifferent aspectsoftheproblemspresentedinidentifying,selecting,andprosecutingnovel antibacterial targets. Much like the approach to powered flight a hundred years ago,itisstilltooearlytosaywhichtechniqueswillultimatelyyieldsuccess.But given the stakes, we must maintain the same faith in our goals as those early pioneers of the air. Finally, we would like to express our gratitude to the expert authors who agreed to contribute to this endeavor. Their creativity and diligence in the field areclearfromthecaliberoftheworkpresented.WealsothankAnitaLekhwani andDanaBigelowofMarcelDekker,Inc.,fortheireffortsinbringingthisproject forward. Thomas J. Dougherty Steven J. Projan Contents Preface iii Contributors ix 1. Global Aspects of Antibiotic Resistance 1 Julian Davies 2. Genomics of Bacterial Pathogens 9 Steven R. Gill, Karen E. Nelson, and Claire M. Fraser 3. Bioinformatics, Genomics, and Antimicrobial Drug Discovery 27 Brian A. Dougherty and Daniel B. Davison 4. The Pathway Tools Software and Its Role in Antimicrobial Drug Discovery 43 Peter D. Karp 5. Genomic Strategies in Antibacterial Drug Discovery 55 Christopher P. Gray and Wolfgang Keck 6. Genomics-Based Approaches to Novel Antimicrobial Target Discovery 71 Thomas J. Dougherty, John F. Barrett, and Michael J. Pucci 7. Pathogenesis Genes as Novel Targets 97 Andrea Marra vii viii Contents 8. Application of Genomics to the Discovery of New Drugs Against Tuberculosis 111 Richard A. Slayden, Dean C. Crick, Michael R. McNeil, and Patrick J. Brennan 9. Phenotype MicroArrays: Their Use in Antibiotic Discovery 135 Barry R. Bochner 10. Microbial Proteomics: New Approaches for Therapeutic Vaccines and Drug Discovery 147 C. Patrick McAtee 11. Surrogate Ligand-Based Assay Systems for Discovery of Antibacterial Agents for Genomic Targets 173 Dale J. Christensen and Paul T. Hamilton 12. Expression Profiling Uses in Antibacterial Chemotherapy Development 187 Paul M. Dunman and Steven J. Projan 13. Using Fungal Genomes for the Discovery, Development, and Clinical Application of Novel and Current Antifungal Therapeutics 201 Todd A. Black, Joan K. Brieland, Jonathan Greene, Catherine Hardalo, Scott S. Walker, and Guillaume Cottarel 14. Genomics in Novel Natural Products Generation 221 Zhiqiang An and William R. Strohl Index 239 Contributors ZhiqiangAn MerckResearchLaboratories,Merck&Co.,Rahway,NewJer- sey, U.S.A. John F. Barrett Merck Research Laboratories, Merck & Co., Rahway, New Jersey, U.S.A. Todd A. Black Chemotherapy and Molecular Genetics, Schering-Plough Re- search Institute, Kenilworth, New Jersey, U.S.A. BarryR.Bochner Research&Development,Biolog,Inc.,Hayward,Califor- nia, U.S.A. Patrick J. Brennan Department of Microbiology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, U.S.A. Joan K. Brieland Chemotherapy and Molecular Genetics, Schering-Plough Research Institute, Kenilworth, New Jersey, U.S.A. Dale J. Christensen Karo Bio USA, Inc., Durham, North Carolina, U.S.A. ix x Contributors Guillaume Cottarel Genome Therapeutics Corp., Waltham, Massachusetts, U.S.A. Dean C. Crick Department of Microbiology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, U.S.A. Julian Davies Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of BritishColumbia, andCubistPharmaceuticals, Inc.,Vancouver, BritishColum- bia, Canada DanielB.Davison DepartmentofBioinformatics,Bristol-MyersSquibbPhar- maceutical Research Institute Pennington, New Jersey, U.S.A. BrianA.Dougherty DepartmentofAppliedGenomics,Bristol-MyersSquibb Pharmaceutical Research Institute, Wallingford, Connecticut, U.S.A. ThomasJ.Dougherty MolecularScience,PfizerGlobalResearchandDevel- opment, Groton, Connecticut, U.S.A. PaulM.Dunman InfectiousDisease-AntibacterialResearch,WyethResearch, Pearl River, New York, U.S.A. ClaireM.Fraser TheInstituteforGenomeResearch(TIGR),Rockville,Mary- land, U.S.A. Steven R. Gill The Institute forGenomic Research (TIGR), Rockville, Mary- land, U.S.A. Christopher P. Gray Morphochem AG, Basel, Switzerland Jonathan Greene Bioinformatics, Schering-Plough Research Institute, Ken- ilworth, New Jersey, U.S.A. Paul T. Hamilton Karo Bio USA, Inc., Durham, North Carolina, U.S.A. Catherine Hardalo Clinical Research, Infectious Diseases, Schering-Plough Research Institute, Kenilworth, New Jersey, U.S.A. PeterD.Karp BioinformaticsResearchGroup,SRIInternational,MenloPark, California, U.S.A. Wolfgang Keck Morphochem AG, Basel, Switzerland Contributors xi AndreaMarra AntibacterialsDiscovery,PfizerGlobalResearchandDevelop- ment, Groton, Connecticut, U.S.A. C. Patrick McAtee Lexicon Genetics, Inc., The Woodlands, Texas, U.S.A. Michael R. McNeil Department of Microbiology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, U.S.A. KarenE.Nelson TheInstituteforGenomicResearch(TIGR),Rockville,Mary- land, U.S.A. Steven J. Projan Wyeth Research, Pearl River, New York, U.S.A. MichaelJ.Pucci AchillionPharmaceuticals,NewHaven,Connecticut,U.S.A. RichardA.Slayden DepartmentofMicrobiology,ColoradoStateUniversity, Fort Collins, Colorado, U.S.A. WilliamR.Strohl MerckResearchLaboratories,Merck&Co.,Rahway,New Jersey, U.S.A. ScottS.Walker ChemotherapyandMolecularGenetics,Schering-PloughRe- search Institute, Kenilworth, New Jersey, U.S.A.
Description: