Michael Tsarion - Irish Origins of Civilization..

688 Pages·2009·9.44 MB·English

n

The Irish Origins of Civilization

(Volume One)

The Servants of Truth

(Druidic Traditions and Influence Explored)

by Michael Tsarion

◊◊◊ ◊◊◊ ◊◊◊

Far westward lies an isle of ancient fame,
By nature blessed, and Scotia is her name:

An island rich - exhaustless is her store

Of veiny silver and golden ore:

Her verdant fields with milk and honey flow,

Her woolly fleeces vie with virgin snow,

Her waving furrows float with verdant corn,
And Arms and Arts her envied sons adorn

- Donatus -

(Bishop of Fiesole, 802 AD)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction 4

1. Man‘s Irrefutable Errors 12
2. So What About the Irish? 21
3. Atlantis and Ireland 27
4. The Atlanteans Arrive 37
5. The Aryans 57
6. The Druids: Priestarchy of the World 70
7. The Solar Church of Ireland 89
8. The Sun King of Ireland 96
9. Jesus, the Star in the West 105
10. The Disciples of Horus 108
11. The Chaldeans 125
12. The Phoenicians 133
13. American Arya 149
14. The Lost Language of the Ancients 156
15. The Atonists Arrive 176
16. Inheritors of Remnants 192
17. The Occult Origins of Christianity
18. What They Could Not Hide 197

19. The Extermination of the Druids 203
20. The British-Israelite Deception 215
21. The Goddess Problem 240
22. Deception Number One 255
23. Comyns Beaumont 262
24. Conclusion 288

Appendices
1. Druidic Symbolism in Masonry & Judeo-
Christianity 292
2. Recent Discoveries Confirming the Irish
Origins of Civilization 385
3. The Minoan Civilization of Crete 414
4. Conor MacDari 431
5. Comyns Boymont 437
6. Laurence Austine Waddell 443
7. Symbolism of the Serpent 447
8. The Trees of Life 461
9. Rape of Tara 667
Reading List and Sources 679

INTRODUCTION

During the next 10 years, the human race is destined to finally discover the facts about
its true origins and destiny. As part of this discovery, we have to address the
overwhelmingly important question of how the phenomena of evil came into the world
and into the consciousness of Earth‘s human inhabitants. This is a question that
should be on the mind of every living man and woman. It has been with us for millennia
and it will be with the children of the future if we do not come upon the answer now. We
have left the question of evil in the hands of theologians and scientists for too long.
This was surely a mistake for, as the casualty statistics clearly testify, the institutions
of religion and science have been the worst purveyors of evil that this planet has ever
had to endure. After centuries of prevarication and criminality, we can no longer afford
to look to these edifices to answer the all-important conundrum of evil - Michael Tsarion
(Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation)

The object of my book Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation, was
to offer forth a theory concerning the origins of evil. I had long desired to
discover how humankind‘s penchant for sadism, cruelty, and injustice came
about.

The book tells the story of the intervention of alien beings from distant galaxies
who, upon their arrival to our planet, engaged in several genetic hybridization
experiments. As a result of these transgenic experiments, ―homo sapiens‖
inherited a divided biology and psyche. This transgression of biological
sovereignty by the alien visitors caused man to be perpetually at war with
himself. Man‘s schizophrenic nature has given rise to schizogenic societies
infested with injustice, crime, delinquency, and perversity. This is psychology
―101‖ and it remains a self-evident fact regardless of whether the deep
symbiotic connections between mind and world are acknowledged and
accepted or whether they are not.

Sadly, it may take another age before people of today‘s spiritually
impoverished world understand the subtle rapport between microcosm and
macrocosm. Nevertheless, let it be understood clearly and distinctly that
freedom and truth will not visit the world while the hearts and minds of men
remain toxic, immoral, and enslaved. As I assert in my other works, there can
be no hope of positive change in our world until the true origins of evil are
reappraised and understood, and until men take responsibility for their
mutilated psychic condition.

The problems that beset us today, both existentially and socially, have a date
of birth. As I show in my work on Atlantis, we were not always beset by such
chronic psychic and social problems. Historically speaking they are recent
phenomena. They date to about 13,000 years ago and they do not have to

persist. In fact, it is my belief that we are now in the final phase of the old
paradigm. The time is coming when both the protagonists and the antagonists
in the human drama will be compelled to face the legacy of the past and also
the forces that enter their lives to restore balance.

Although I covered some of the key events pertaining to the alien visitation,
and subsequent infection of our perfumed planet by their presence, and
although I did bring things up to the present ―Silicon Age,‖ I stressed that it
was not possible to cover the various exploits and machinations of the visitors
throughout history. Space did not permit me to delineate the fascinating story
of how the surviving Atlanteans and Lemurians (both descendants of the so-
called
―Fallen
Angels‖)
toiled
to
establish
new
civilizations
after

incomprehensibly horrific cataclysms decimated their habitats. It is time now to
address the new world that arose in the aftermath of the ―Age of Catastrophe.‖

◊◊◊

In the present volume, several novel ideas that the reader should be aware of
are presented. The first and most important argument concerns the West to
East migration of the elements of civilization. This theory rests upon the
understanding that there were, in prehistoric times, highly developed
civilizations situated in the Western hemisphere. These civilizations were
brought to an abrupt end approximately 13,000 years BC, by terrestrial
upheavals of an unimaginable scale. The gnosis that had been accumulated
by the advanced inhabitants of these hoary civilizations originated on the
landmasses known today as Ireland, England, Scotland, and Wales. These
countries were once part of Atlantis or, more specifically, of the great continent
of Appalachia. From these locations the gnosis was eventually carried
Eastward across lost land bridges into Europe and Asia.

Secondly, we contend that the term Aryan has been most egregiously
misused. We believe it referred not to race but caste. It was a term that simply
distinguished spiritual and moral status. In our work, therefore, we use the
term to refer to men from any racial stock who had perfected themselves in
schools of initiation and who were adepts of high order. We use the term to
identify the Irish Druids and their Mesolithic ancestors, the European Sami, the
Phoenician and Median Magi, the Egyptian Disciples of Horus, the Mer, the
Ibaru, and any other group of bards, poets, seers, prophets, hierophants,
archimandrites, and architects of distinction. The term Aryan was erroneously
accepted as a racial distinction after its discovery by the eighteenth century
scholar and Chief Justice Sir William Jones of Calcutta. Jones discovered that
the Hindus referred to their ancestors who appeared in Northern India and

Pakistan during the seventh century BC, as the ―Arya.‖ He did not realize that
the term signified spiritual qualities rather than racial, ethnic, or linguistic ones.
As linguists adopt the term to signify a class of languages, so we adopt it in a
purest context to represent those Elders of any racial background possessed
of exalted minds and hearts. We are convinced that our rendition and
interpretation will serve to clarify many historical anomalies and mysteries.
When speaking of the racial origins or nature of the Mesolithic and Megalithic
Irish, we prefer to use the more descriptive and accurate terms ―Nordic,‖
―Gothic,‖ ―Caucasian,‖ and ―Indo-European.‖

Thirdly, we reject the term ―Celtic,‖ and refuse to use it when describing the
ancient inhabitants existing in Ireland before 600 BC. We tentatively accept
that Britain was finally reached by people who have been called ―Goidelic‖ and
―Brythonic‖ Celts after 600 BC; groups that anthropologists and historians
finally had to admit were merely fragments of the larger Indo-European race.
Of these invasions have Tacitus, Caesar, and Pythias the Greek, written.
Nevertheless, we prefer to deal with the pre-Celtic inhabitants and their
antique civilization that had, in remote ages, spread Eastward into Europe and
Asia. We leave the word ―Celtic‖ intact when quoting, confident that the reader
will understand that it is a blanket term often used indiscriminately by authors
referring to Ireland‘s exceptionally gifted inhabitants who are, more correctly,
the ―Mesolithic‖ or even ―Megalithic‖ people; builders of the cyclopean temples
of Ireland and the world that still stand as silent testaments to their august
presence. The Celtic tribes of the Iron Age, believed to have entered Ireland
after 600 BC, built their own civilizations upon the foundations of earlier ones
they found there, which they reckoned had been erected by the ―gods.‖

The Tuatha, G. W. Atkinson supposes, must be the highly intellectual race that
imported into Ireland our Oghams, round towers, architecture, metal work, and, above
all, the exquisite art which has come down to us in our wonderful illuminated Irish
manuscripts. The polished Tuatha were certainly contrasted with the rude Celts. Arthur
Clive declares that civilization came in with an earlier race than the Celts, and retired
with their conquest by the latter - James Bonwick (Irish Druids and Old Irish Religions)

The Tuatha de Danann were the ancient inhabitants of Ireland who were forced to give
way to the Gaels and to become the gods of Celtic imagination, the lords of the
subterranean world. There is no doubt that the name Tuatha de Danann was given to
the pre-Celtic inhabitants of Ireland and that it must have been they who built the
megaliths. Their uncertain origins combined with their curious stone constructions give
them a cloak of mystery...If the Celts drove out the megalithic peoples of Ireland, there
is no reason why the same thing should not have happened on the continent, where
much of the region occupied by the Celts still bears traces of megalithic monuments -
Jean Markale (The Celts)

The first authority to dispense with the term ―Celtic,‖ and to point out its
spuriousness, was the great alternative historian and linguist Professor
Laurence Austine Waddell. Strangely, although they probably were, and are,

familiar with Professor Waddell‘s writings and theories, most historians
(alternative and orthodox) have continued to employ the term ―Celtic‖ even
when it is liable to engender and perpetuate misunderstandings. In our work
we adhere to Professor Waddell‘s sound counsel regarding this unfortunate
but widely used term.

...there is no evidence in the British Isles to suggest that a population group of any size
migrated from the continent in the first millennium BC - Sir Barrington Windsor Cunliffe
(Iron Age Britain)

No traditional or historical reference or record whatever exists of the migration of any
people called "Celts" into Early Britain - Professor L. A. Waddell (Phoenician Origins of the
Britons, Scots, and Anglo-Saxons)

…to speak, as is so commonly done, of "Celtic ancestry," the "Celtic temperament"
and "Celtic fire" amongst any section of the natives of these islands, is, according to
anthropologists, merely imaginary! - ibid

The term ―Celt‖ did not exist in the ancient languages of the Irish, Scots, or
Welsh. There is only the Pictish Khaltis, most likely signifying invaders from
France, Belgium, Germany, Galatia, and the Ukraine. The term ―Celt‖ (Keltoi)
was first employed by the incompetent Greek historian Herodotus to describe
Western Europeans such as the Irish, Scots, and Gauls, etc. After his time
other historians, such as Caesar and Strabo, continued to use this vague term
to broadly denote any foreign tribe that Rome considered barbaric and
antagonistic. Suggestively, however, Caesar, Tacitus, Hecataeus, Strabo, and
Herodatus, never employed the term to describe the people of Britain. And this
at least we find accurate. Possibly, they knew that these Celtic groups were,
as their languages indicate, merely a branch of the Indo-European race that
had inherited their language, customs, traditions, and religion from highly
sophisticated ancestors whom most historians and anthropologists have been
conspicuously reluctant to name or describe, and whose influence had spread
to India, Egypt, China, and the Americas. It is only in relatively recent times
that this ambiguous term ―Celtic‖ has been transposed to define the early Irish.
By the nineteenth century its usage in this regard was common. Nevertheless,
to use the term ―Celtic‖ to signify the racial quality of the ancient Irish is an
utterly futile endeavor since the physiology, stature, and pigmentation of these
peoples is markedly dissimilar from those Pictish, Gaelic, Slavic, Germanic,
Alpine, Iberian, Mediterranean, (―Continental‖) Celtic types that, although
related to Indo-European races, had probably perpetually crossed-bred with
non-Caucasians throughout Europe and Asia.

In the composition of Celtic the old Indo-European predominates enormously. This is
an established fact of great importance - M. R. Dobie (The Rise of the Celts)

So we see that the ambiguous term ―Celtic‖ was introduced at a late date by
Greeks and Romans. Then in the seventeenth century it was re-introduced by
the Welsh antiquarian Edward Lhuyd (1660-1709), and by others of his
sentimental disposition. We would prefer the term be dropped universally
when referring to the racial origins of the ancient Britons and Irish. The Irish
were not ―Celtic.‖ They were Celticized by invading foreign powers; particularly
those from Rome.

Did the islanders really call themselves Celts?...It is extremely doubtful whether the
inhabitants of Ireland ever gave themselves a name of the kind - M. R. Dobie (The Rise of
the Celts)

However, there is one thing that the Romans, modern archaeologists and the Iron Age
islanders themselves would all agree on: they were not Celts. This was an invention of
the 18th century; the name was not used earlier. The idea came from the discovery
around 1700 that the non-English island tongues relate to that of the ancient
continental Gauls, who really were called Celts. This ancient continental ethnic label
was applied to the wider family of languages. But 'Celtic' was soon extended to
describe insular monuments, art, culture and peoples, ancient and modern: island
'Celtic' identity was born, like Britishness, in the 18th century – Dr. Simon James (The
Peoples of Britain)

After its introduction by Edward Lluyd in 1707, the use of the word "Celtic" as an
umbrella term for the pre-Roman peoples of Britain gained considerable popularity in
the nineteenth century, and remains in common usage. However its historical basis is
now seen as dubious by many historians and archaeologists, and this usage has been
called into question. Simon James, formerly of the British Museum…makes the point
that the Romans never used the term "Celtic‖...in reference to the peoples of Britain
and Ireland, and points out that the modern term "Celt" was coined as a useful umbrella
term in the early 18th century to distinguish the non-English inhabitants of the
archipelago when England united with Scotland in 1707 to create the Kingdom of Great
Britain and the later union of Great Britain and Ireland as the United Kingdom in 1800.
Nationalists in Scotland, Ireland and Wales looked for a way to differentiate themselves
from England and assert their right to independence. James then argues that, despite
the obvious linguistic connections, archaeology does not suggest a united Celtic
culture and that the term is misleading, no more (or less) meaningful than "Western" -
(Wikipedia Online Encyclopedia)

The so-called Celtic Question, than which no greater stumbling block in the way of
clear thinking exists…there is practically today a complete unanimity of opinion among
physical anthropologists that the term Celt, if used at all, belongs to the brachycephalic
(round-headed) darkish population of the Alpine (Swiss) highlands…totally lacking in
the British Isles - W. Z. Ripley (Races of Europe)

"Celt" is now a term that skeptics consider so corrupted in the archaeological and
popular literature that it is worthless - Stephen Oppenheimer (The Origins of the British: A
Genetic Detective Story)

The term ―Gaelic‖ (referring to later Celtic arrivals, the ―Goidels‖) is retained
when quoting, and as a traditionally acceptable term for the language spoken

in Ireland from a remote period, influenced by later visitors, and radically
modified after the colonization of Romans, Anglo-Saxons, and Normans. We
hesitate to use the term to designate the primordial inhabitants of Ireland. The
Gaels, or Goidels, were another branch of the Celtic groups from Europe who
allegedly crossed to Ireland around the fourth, fifth, or sixth centuries BC
(depending on which officially posited theory one believes). These Goidels
were known by the Irish mythographers as the ―Milesians‖ or ―Children of Mil.‖
They were descendants of the Scythian ―Celts‖ who had visited Egypt and
returned to their Western homelands after the reign of Pharaoh Akhenaton.
Among their number was Scota, the daughter of the Atonist pharaoh and his
consort Nefertiti.

◊◊◊

In his fine book Dawn of Civilization, Egyptologist Sir G. Maspero expressed a
great historical question that we seek, in our present text, to address and
solve. He asked:

What were the people by whom it (Egyptian Civilization) was developed, the country
whence they came, the Race to which they belonged, is today unknown

The solution to this age-old problem involves a critical look at the information
that has been supplied to us concerning the origin, migration, and dispersion
of the elements of civilization. It involves a reappraisal of Post-Diluvian history
and of the roles played, not only by the empires of Asia Minor and Egypt, but
also by those of Ireland, Scotland, Wales, and England. This work will show
the reader how important the ancient lands, known poetically as Logres and
Albion, were to the future of the world. In this text, we will show that the
civilizing role of these lands has been deliberately obscured due to a
pernicious age-long campaign of knowledge suppression and mass-murder.

The auction of a whole civilization, the finest known, and the extermination of
the Druids, are two of many subjects that are brought into the limelight in these
volumes. It is for this reason that this author first chose, in his previous book,
to deal with Atlantis and Lemuria, since it was from there that the story of the
ancestors of the Gaels and Celts began. If we are to seek out the origins of the
Arthurian legends and of the Welsh, Irish, and Scottish myths, it is to lost
Atlantis and Lemuria that we are to look. And if we are to seek out reasons as
to why the true story of these places and peoples has not hitherto been
revealed, we need to begin with the contingents who dominate and rule
mankind from behind the obvious thrones of religion and politics. As I revealed
in my first book, these ruthless agencies also happen to have their origins in

the ancient past. They are either the biological or ideological descendants of
the sorcerers of Atlantis.

In our text we wish to accomplish three main things. We wish to explore, as
much as may be possible, the evidence for the West to East migration of the
elements of civilization. However, since it is illogical to suppose that any single
volume can hope to furnish complete proof of this thesis, we offer our work as
an introductory overview to stimulate interest with the reminder that it is merely
a progress report on a great study that needs the proverbial jump-start. This
great thesis was first explored at the turn of the last century by Anna Wilkes
and Conor Mac Dari and then, later, by the great Comyns Beaumont. Since
Beaumont‘s time interest has lapsed and we know its controversiality to be the
reason for this. We specifically address the Irish origins of civilization and
begin at least to nullify many of the counter-arguments that deem the elements
of civilization to be of Greek, Roman, and Jewish origin. Furthermore, we
eagerly examine the ancient roots of modern tyranny. The Irish origins of
civilization have been obscured and we find ourselves duly interested in the
nature and agenda of the obscurers. Their contentious work had to be for a
reason and we suppose they have not confined their work of obscuration to
this one area alone. Moreover, as we will show, the millennia-old knowledge
possessed and used to good effect by the ancient Druids and their ancestors
was appropriated by those with no legitimate claim to it. It has been used as a
weapon against humanity. The wielders of the weapon of occult knowledge
will be revealed and their executive branch finally exposed before the world.

We strongly believe and advocate that it is quite impossible for good men to
ever triumph over the malign (and originally alien) Establishment that controls
humankind without a thorough working knowledge of the way in which it
operates to achieve success. If we are to defeat the world‘s merciless and
tyrannical hierarchs we must, like detectives, be thoroughly conversant with
their modus operandi and, like hounds on a trail, must be familiar with their
scent, so to speak. Our adversary is both a mutilator and a scavenger. It is a
virus within the ailing body politic. It is a cunning alien force that has infected
humankind with its own anti-human nature. It is within us as much as it is out
there in our world. We are either of its kind, and under its power, or we are its
sworn opponents. In light of this, my inquiry is not for everyone. It has been
composed for the new generation of Opposers, imbued with an ardent and
unvanquishable Spirit of Rebellion. It is a manifesto for those who will in their
time witness the demise of evil and the ruin of its agents. It is not for those
who cannot comprehend the severity of the infamy in their world or who lack
the Spirit of Contradiction.

It is not this author‘s intention to provide weaponry to those without inherent
systemic strength, will, and passion. My message is intended for those

readers who do understand that the domestic, social, and economic worlds
they live in and labor to perpetuate, like the political parties voted for, have
been created by powerful and sophisticated unseen forces that have, age after
age, placed men, women, and children upon the dark altars of sacrifice as
offerings to their vile perfidious gods. Like Edgar Allen Poe‘s nightmarish
pendulum, the blades of the tyrannical ritual-murderers are now as I write
descending toward the neck of humanity for the last time. Time is short but,
though it may at first seem meager comfort, let us remember that if and when
lightening strikes in a shadow-haunted landscape, we get to see everything
with incredible lucidity. For that incendiary instant nothing is hidden from the
eye. May this work provide such a flash in the dark. May it illumine the
workings of the ingenious machinery of evil that pulverizes truth, freedom, and
virtue, and beneath which the once radiant, truth-intoxicated souls of men now
lie prostrate.

Y Gwir Erbyn Y Byd ("Truth Against the World") - Druidic Motto

CHAPTER 1.

Man's Irrefutable Errors

The Irish are one of the most ancient nations that I know of at this end of the world, and
are from as mighty a race as the world ever brought forth - Edward Spenser (writer, and
British Government official in Ireland, AD 1596)

In this volume we seek to present, in as erudite a manner as possible, the
case for the Irish origins of civilization. We have been driven to publicly
present the fruits of our lifelong inquiry into this subject partly because we wish
to correctly frame our efforts at historical revisionism. Our revisionism exists so
that men might discover what has been hidden from them regarding history
and religion. Only with correct knowledge of the past can men build a sane
world fit to live in. The man living his life in confusion, impotency, and fear, is
the man expertly trained to forget where he has come from. From his
precarious pedestal his vision of the world is skewed and limited and his fall
into the void prevented only by externally provided stabilizers. Such a man
remains existentially weak, like a fragile sapling in danger of breaking in a light
breeze let alone in a mighty storm. Alternatively, the strong man has a sense
of where he has come from. He stands upon his own feet and from a stable
pedestal views both past and future with clear fearless eyes. He does not
prevaricate when it comes to questions of justice. He hastens to challenge
those who would strangle him in webs of ignorance and works relentlessly to
expose the criminality of those who have in ages past massacred his
ancestors, and presently threaten his hard won physical and mental freedom.
The strong man knows his job is to build well upon the solid foundations laid
by his ancestors. He wages perpetual war against those who attempt to burn
down those foundations. Serving the will of his ancestors is the strong man's
passion. The weak man, on the other hand, meekly heeds the commands of
deceivers bent upon using ancient occult knowledge to physically and
spiritually undermine his brothers and sisters in the world. The strong
undefeatable man knows his enemies and how to correctly deal with them. He
has studied their nature and the knowledge they perversely use as a weapon
against him and all humanity.

The simple minded will believe anything: but the wise looketh well into everything he
does - (Proverbs 14:15)

Our revisionist work is certainly controversial, and we acknowledge the
resistance our inquiries will face. Fortunately, the disbelief and consternation

of those unsettled by our revelations mean nothing to us. We are not
motivated by the lure of awards, flowers, and speeches. We are in dread
earnest in our opposition to despots who, on a daily basis, clearly demonstrate
their contempt for truth, freedom, and justice. We stand against the tyrannous
architects of the ―New World Order‖ rising from the ashes of an old order
humanity is not meant to know existed. We oppose this new inhuman Atonist
order without fear or fright, and pity its makers for their psychosis and spiritual
vacuity. Their days of infamy and oppression are coming to an end and it only
remains for us to dig deep the graves into which they will inevitably crash,
along with their treachery and megalomania. To such work we are
temperamentally well suited. Certainly, we are not in opposition to religion as it
is practiced by the sincere independent devotee. We do not seek to intrude
into that space reserved for private worship. But we do stand opposed to the
institutions that have inserted themselves and their mythology between the
individual and his creator. We do not intend to offer any disclaimer and
dedicate ourselves passionately to our free thought and analysis of the
phantasmagorias placed before us by the institutions of the world. Our attitude
is best expressed by the German historian Max Muller who, in 1878, wrote:

A comparison of all the religions of the world, in which none can claim a privileged
position, will no doubt seem to many dangerous and reprehensible...But this I will say,
that, as far as my humble judgment goes, it does not entail the loss of anything that is
essential to true religion, and that, if we strike the balance honestly, the gain is
immeasurably greater than the loss...All truth is safe, and nothing else is safe; and he
who keeps back the truth, or withholds it from men...is either a coward or a criminal, or
both - (The Science of Religion)

What are civilizations made of? How do they come about? Are the foundations
of our civilization strong or weak? Are these questions meaningful to modern
men and women? Perhaps they are, and perhaps not.

In any case, when we examine the deep foundations of
civilization, we discover something fascinating. We
discover that our ancestors had based their lives upon
instruction taken from the heavens above their heads. The
night sky was the veritable altar of ancestral man. All that
occurred in it was reverently observed, recorded, and
contemplated. Was this superstition or something else?
And what could have prompted such devotion? Who first
developed the idea to look up to the starry sky for
instruction? Who first decided to map the rotating paths of
the sun and moon and to demarcate the zodiac's twelve
signs? And was this exercise a misguided waste of time
and energy, or did it matter? Have human civilizations
been founded and guided aright by those whose heads

were well and truly "in the clouds?" Research into these
questions and into "heavenly" matters reveals the zodiac
to be a very mysterious and important phenomenon. It
was referred to as the celestial mystery school for good
reason since, strange as it may seem at first, the zodiac
mirrors consciousness.

The men who looked up into the night sky were really looking into themselves.
The gnosis of the heavens is the gnosis of the soul. Civilizations erected upon
zodiacal principles are erected upon the infinite ancestral reservoir of
knowledge within man's own being. There are no stronger foundations. As the
Hermetic motto states: As Above, So Below.

Our present understanding of the zodiac is
far from that of the ancient magi. The keepers
of the mysteries of the heavens knew the
zodiac to be a projection of the human
unconscious and not merely an external
phenomenon. There was nothing contained
in the heavens and zodiac that did not dwell
within the mind of man. There was nothing in
nature that was not part of man. Nature was
not seen as a having a separate or distinct
life. Its life was man's life. Man's life was
nature's life. Man and nature are one, and
there is no separating the two. This is the
sum of the lost knowledge of the ancients.
The first people in recorded history to study
the operations of the heavens and zodiac,
and to understand the strange but intimate
connections between physical and psychic
energy, were the Druids from the "Fortunate"
or "Blessed Isles." From these Elders the
arcane
archive
of
knowledge
was

surreptitiously appropriated by their enemies,
the servants of darkness, whose biological
and ideological descendants now rule the
world. Despite coming under their vile blood-
soaked hands it has not perished. It took birth
in an age before our own in places lost to
history and time, but not to memory.

Ayn Rand: Russian-American

philosopher and author

This Gnosis is luminous and invincible. It is capable of enlightening those who
approach with reverence and destroying those who refuse to do so.

Civilizations that lose their foundations fall as surely as men without souls.
Such is the law of life. Man can learn this law, and adapt to it, or he can ignore
it. His choice determines his future. As the American philosopher Ayn Rand
said: ―Man is free to choose not to be conscious, but not free to escape the
penalty of unconsciousness: destruction.‖

Most historians accept that Egypt was a cradle of civilization, and that many
cultural idioms and traditions come from there. What has yet to be understood,
however, is the manner in which Egypt inherited its cultural elements from the
lands of the North-West. This fact is not known today because of the threat it
poses to Rome and London, the Vatican and Crown, and to all those who
have profited from the suppression of knowledge. After all, what is the subject
of history? It is the study of the past, certainly. But it is also the study of man. It
is the attempt by men to find out who they are by analyzing and reviewing
what they have been. Even though scientific methodologies have a role within
the subject of history, history is not science. Most importantly, students of
history can easily be misled. A lot of problems and errors can come about
when men attempt to study men. Moreover, the subject itself may be
deliberately manipulated and skewed so that little is truly known.
Paradoxically, it takes time to erase the fallacies that men entertain about the
past. The proof for what we say is evident to those who have taken the time to
think about history and what has been taught to them about the world of the
ancestors. The subject of history is less than 200 years old. In that time men
have convinced themselves of the following suppositions, some of which have
been regarded as irrefutable truths.

There were no advanced pre-diluvian civilizations

Early man was primitive, rude, and malevolent

The Mesolithic and Megalithic sites throughout the world were constructed

by unrelated races

The ambassadors of civilization were Greeks, Romans, and Jews

The various elements of civilization were brought by the "Chosen People"

from East to West

The Jews were uniquely distinguished. They possessed a naturally religious

and moral disposition and were truly a god-inspired ―chosen people‖

The Jews were slaves in Egypt and hard-pressed to preserve their unique

identity and beliefs