Chapter 17 Method Development for Calculating Minor Actinide Transmutation in a Fast Reactor ToshikazuTakeda,KojiFujimura,andRyotaYamada Abstract Toeffectivelytransmuteminoractinides(MAs),whichhavelong-lived radioactivity and high decay heat, fast reactors are very promising because many minor actinides can be loaded and transmutation rates are high compared to light water reactors. With the increase of loaded minor actinides, the neutron spectrum becomes hard and core safety parameters will deteriorate. Especially, the sodium voidreactivityincreaseswithMAadditiontocores.Toovercomethedifficulty,we proposeMAtransmutationfastreactorsusingcoreconceptswithasodiumplenum andinternalblanketregioninreactorcores.Therefore,coresbecomecomplex,and calculationaccuracybecomespoor.Toaccuratelyevaluatetheneutronicproperties suchasMAtransmutationrateandsodiumvoidreactivity,weimprovedcalculation methods. Inthis chapter we show new methods for calculating MA transmutation rates for each MA nuclide, for calculating the uncertainty of MA transmutation usingsensitivities.Anewsensitivityisderivedthatisdefinedasarelativechange of core parameters relative to infinite-dilution cross sections, not effective cross sections.Toeliminatebiasfactorsinestimatingcoreparameteruncertainties,anew method is proposed. This method is used to reduce the calculation uncertainty throughtheuseofadjustedcrosssections. Keywords Calculation methods • Fast reactors • Minor actinide • Sensitivity •Sodiumvoidreactivity•Transmutation 17.1 Introduction The importance of nuclear energy, as a realistic option to solve the issues of the depletionofenergyresourcesandtheglobalenvironment,hasbeenacknowledged worldwide. However, acceptance of large-scale contributions would depend on satisfactionofkeydriverstoenhancesustainabilityintermsofeconomics,safety, T.Takeda(*)•R.Yamada ResearchInstituteofNuclearEngineering,UniversityofFukui,Fukui,Japan e-mail:[email protected] K.Fujimura HitachiWorks,Hitachi-GENuclearEnergy,Ltd.,Ibaraki,Japan ©TheAuthor(s)2015 179 K.Nakajima(ed.),NuclearBack-endandTransmutationTechnologyforWaste Disposal,DOI10.1007/978-4-431-55111-9_17 180 T.Takedaetal. adequacyofnaturalresources,wastereduction,nonproliferation,andpublicaccep- tance. Fast reactors with fuel recycle enhance the sustainability indices signifi- cantly,leadingtothefocusonsodium-cooledfastreactors(SFR)intheGeneration IV International Forum (GIF) and theInternational Project on Innovative Nuclear Reactors and Fuel Cycles (INPRO) initiative of the International Atomic Energy Agency(IAEA). The necessary condition for successful fast reactor deployment is the under- standingandassessmentofinnovativetechnologicalanddesignoptions,basedon bothpastknowledgeandexperience,aswellasonongoingresearchandtechnology development efforts. The severe accident at Tokyo Electric Power Company’s FukushimaDai-IchiNuclearPowerStationcausedbytheGreatEastJapanEarth- quakeandtsunamionMarch11,2011promptedallcountriestoredefinetheirfast reactor programs. To achieve the successful deployment of fast reactors, drastic safety enhancement is the most important issue to be established, especially in Japan,wheretherestartofnuclearpowerplantsoncethesehavebeenstoppedisa seriousmatterofargument. Thesafetyaspectsoffastreactors(FRs)havebeenreviewed[1–4]inrepresen- tative countries that have developed or have a plan to develop fast reactors in the nearfuture,especiallyaftertheFukushimaaccident.Thesecountriesareimproving thesafetyofSFRsbyconsideringtheDiD(defenseindepth).ThedesignsofSFRs shouldhavetolerancetoDBA(designbasisaccidents)andBDBA(beyonddesign basis accident) caused by internal and external events. The inherent safety and passive safety should be effectively utilized for reactor shutdown and reactor cooling. Forthecaseofsevereaccidents,itisindispensablefirsttoshutdown the reactors.Furthermore,decayheatremovalisalsoindispensableeveninthecaseof SBO (station black out). For SFRs, natural circulation can be expected in the sodium heat transport systems and the decay heat can be removal to atmosphere bytheaircoolingsystem. In Japan, the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology haslaunchedanationalprojectentitled“Technologydevelopmentfortheenviron- mentalburdenreduction”in2013.Thepresentstudyisoneofthestudiesadoptedas thenationalproject.Theobjectiveofthestudyistheefficientandsafetransmuta- tion and volume reduction of MAs with long-lived radioactivity and high decay heat containedin HLW insodium-cooled fast reactors. We are aimingto develop MAtransmutationcoreconceptsharmonizingMAtransmutationperformancewith coresafety.ThecoreconceptisshowninChap.2.Also,weareaimingtoimprove design accuracy related to MA transmutation performance. To validate and improve design accuracy of the high safety and high MA transmutation perfor- manceofSFRcores,wedevelopedmethodsforcalculatingtransmutationratesof individualMAnuclidesandestimatingtheuncertaintyofMAtransmutation. AnewdefinitionoftransmutationratesofindividualMAnuclidesisderivedin Chap. 3. Using the definition, one can understand the physical meanings of trans- mutation for individual MA nuclides. Sensitivities are required to estimate the uncertainty of MA transmutation rates from cross-section errors. In Chap. 4, sen- sitivity calculation methods are derived. First, the sensitivity calculation method 17 MethodDevelopmentforCalculatingMinorActinideTransmutationinaFast... 181 relativetoinfinite-dilutioncrosssectionsisintroduced.TheMAtransmutationrates areburn-upproperties.Thus,thesensitivitycalculationmethodforburn-up-depen- dent properties is derived. Finally, we investigate how many energy groups are requiredin sensitivity calculations. Calculated MA transmutation rates have large uncertaintiesresultingfromthelargeuncertaintiesinMAcrosssections.Toreduce theseuncertaintiesinMAtransmutationrates,weintroduceanewmethodtoreduce predictionuncertaintiesofMAtransmutation rates inChap.5.Inthismethod, we eliminate bias factors included in experiments and calculations by using ratios of thecalculationtotheexperimentofcoreperformanceparameters.Afterremoving thebiasfactors,thecrosssectionisadjustedusingmeasureddata.Theconclusions areshowninChap.6. 17.2 MA Transmutation Core Concept MAtransmutationcoreconceptsaredevelopedbyconsideringtheamountofMA loadingandthesafety-relatedcoreparameters.IncreaseofMAloadinginthecore ofaSFRmakestheamountofMAtransmutationlarge,whichmaydecreaselong- termradiotoxicityanddecayheatofMA.Ontheotherhand,loadingalargeamount of MA into the core of a SFR increases the sodium void reactivity. Therefore, harmonization of MA transmutation and sodium void reactivity is a key issue in designingthecoreconcepts.Asanexample,Fig.17.1showstherelationshipofMA contentandsodiumvoidreactivity;whentheMAcontentisabout10%,thesodium voidreactivityincreasesbyabout1$. AhomogeneousMA-loadedcoreof750MWewasdesignedintheFaCTproject [1, 2] (Fig. 17.2). The configuration of this core is a conventional homogeneous core and homogeneous MA loading into the core fuel increases sodium void reactivity.Therefore, MA content inthe corefuelassemblyislimitedtolessthan about 5 wt%. On the other hand, the safety issue has become more and more important sincetheFukushimaDaiichiNPPaccident.Further,lowvoidreactivity SFR designing has been pursued in Russia and France [5]. In this study, the coexistence of enhanced MA transmutation and zero void reactivity, that is, the harmonizationofMAtransmutationandcoresafety,issetasanobjective. Hitachi proposed an axially heterogeneous core (AHC) concept with sodium plenum[6,7].Itwasclarifiedthatanincreaseoffluxlevelatthetopofthecorefuel causedbythepresenceoftheinternalblanketanddecreaseoftheheightoftheinner corefuelgreatlydecreasedsodiumvoidreactivity.Inthecoreconcept,sodiumvoid reactivity can be extremely reduced without disrupting core performance for normaloperation.ThedifferenceincoreconfigurationsbetweentheHitachiAHC withsodiumplenumproposedinFR‘91[6]andtheASTRIDACV[5],whichhas been recently studied in France, is that absorber material is loaded in the upper shieldfortheASTRIDACV. We are going to optimize the specifications of the core shown in Fig. 17.3 to realize the high MA transmutation and zero sodium void reactivity. Figure 17.4 182 T.Takedaetal. Fig.17.1 Dependencyofsodiumvoidreactivityonminoractinide(MA)content Fig.17.2 CoreconfigurationofthehomogeneousMA-loadedcore shows the axial distribution of coolant density and the density coefficient of that core.Thesodiumdensitycoefficient(%Δk/kk0/Δρ)inthesodiumplenumbecomes positive. On the other hand, sodium density change (Δρ) in the sodium plenum becomes negative because of the increase of coolant temperature for an accident such as ULOF (unprotected loss of flow accident). Therefore, net sodium void reactivitybecomesnegative. Themechanismforreducingsodiumvoidreactivityofthecoreisthattheaxial neutronleakageislargelyenhancedwithcoolantvoidinginthesodiumplenum.It is known that the evaluated leakage component of sodium void reactivity with diffusion theory might be overestimated by about 50 %. Therefore, calculation 17 MethodDevelopmentforCalculatingMinorActinideTransmutationinaFast... 183 Fig.17.3 Verticalviewof axiallyheterogeneouscore withsodiumplenum Fig.17.4 Axialdistributionofcoolantdensityanddensitycoefficient accuracy for sodium void reactivity of the core with a sodium plenum might be poor. Thus, we should consider change of the neutron spectrum in the heteroge- neousMAloadedcore.Figure17.5showstheneutronspectraforMOXdriverfuel without MA and 10 % MA-mixed fuels in transmutation target with and without Zr-Hx.Thespectrumof10%MA-mixedfuelintransmutationtargetwithoutZr-Hx is slightly softer than that of the MOX driver fuel withoutMA, becausethe 10 % MA-mixed fuel in the transmutation target has no fissile plutonium but the MOX driver fuel includes 239Pu and 241Pu. The neutron spectrum of the moderator mixturetargetfuelisclearlysofterthanotherfuels. 184 T.Takedaetal. Fig.17.5 NeutronspectraforMOXfuelandMAtransmutationtargetfuels 17.3 MA Transmutation Rate LetusfirstintroduceadefinitionoftransmutationratesofindividualMAnuclides fueledinareactorcore.Thecalculationmethodofthetransmutationraterelativeto the nuclides is as follows. First, conventional burn-up calculations are carried out andburn-up-dependentfluxineachregioniscalculated,whichisusedinthesecond step calculation. In the second step, we consider only the relevant MA in each regionandperformburn-upcalculationsusingthefluxobtainedinthefirststep. Inthissecondstepofcalculation,nuclidekisproducedfromtheoriginalnuclide l.Therearemanypassesofreactionsoftransmutationoftheinitialnuclide(shown by N) and the production of N as is shown in Fig. 17.6. We can calculate the productionrateofnuclidekattimeTfromtheinitialnuclidelas P ¼Ne ðTÞ=Ne ð0Þ ð17:1Þ lk k l whereNe ð0Þisnumberdensityofnuclidelattime0andNe ðTÞisnumberdensityof l k nuclide k at time T, assuming nuclide lis present aloneat t¼0.Using Ne ðTÞ, the k overallfission(seeFig.17.6)relativetotheinitialnuclideliscalculatedas XZT OFl ¼ σkðtÞNe ðtÞϕðtÞdt ð17:2Þ f k k 0 whereσk(t)isfissioncrosssectionofnuclidekattimet,ϕ(t)isneutronfluxattime f t, and Σ is summation over all nuclides k resulting from initial nuclide l; this 17 MethodDevelopmentforCalculatingMinorActinideTransmutationinaFast... 185 Fig.17.6 TransmutationofinitialMAnuclidesandproductionoftheMAnuclide includes all the fissions from the initial nuclide l. Furthermore, the production of otherMAnuclidesexcepttheinitialnuclidelcanbecalculatedby X OMAl ¼Ne ð0Þ P ð17:3Þ l lk k∈MA,k6¼l ThePuandUproductionfromnuclidelisgivenby X PUl ¼Ne ð0Þ P ð17:4Þ l lk k∈U,Pu TheproductionofMAnuclidelfromPuandUisgivenby X PUMl ¼ Ne ð0ÞP ð17:5Þ k kl k∈U,Pu TheproductionofMAnuclidelfromotherMAisgivenby X MAMl ¼ Ne ð0ÞP ð17:6Þ k kl k∈MA,k6¼l UsingEqs.(17.2),(17.3),(17.4),(17.5),and(17.6),thenettransmutationofnuclide liscalculatedby 186 T.Takedaetal. TRl ¼OFlþOMAlþPUl(cid:2)PUMl(cid:2)MAMl ð17:7Þ In Fig. 17.6, the individual parameters OMAl, PUl, PUMl, MAMl, and OFl are shown.PUMlandMAMldenotetheproductionsoftherelevantMAnuclidefrom fuel (Pu, U) and other MA nuclides, respectively. Thus, there are minus signs in these parameters in Eq. (17.7), whereas other parameters show the elimination of therelevantMAnuclide,sothesignsarepositive. When weconsider thetotalMA transmutation forallMAnuclides,thesecond andthefifthtermscanceleachother,sothewholetransmutationisgivenby X X (cid:2) (cid:3) TR¼ TRl ¼ OFlþPUl(cid:2)PUMl ð17:8Þ l∈MA l∈MA Therefore,wecandefinetheMAtransmutationofMAnuclidelby TRl ¼OFlþPUl(cid:2)PUMl ð17:9Þ Thus, the transmutation rate is composed of two terms: the first is the amount of incineration rate by fission and the second is the net transmutation rate to fuel (UandPu).Thefirstfissionratesofindividualnuclidescontainthedirectfissionof the relevant nuclide plus the fission of other nuclides transmuted by decays or neutron reactions as “overall fission” [OFl in Eq. (17.9)] (Fig. 17.7). It was found that the indirect fission contribution by 238Pu and 239Pu is remarkably large for nuclides239Npand241Am.ThenetproductionratesofUandPuarecalculatedfrom the difference between the production rates of U and Pu from the relevant MA nuclide and the MA production from the initial U and Pu. Figure 17.7 shows the overall fission rate of 237Np in a thermal advanced pressurized water reactor (APWR) and two fast reactors, a MOX-fueled sodium-cooled fast reactor and a metal-fueledlead-cooledfastreactor[8].Inthethermalreactor,theoverallfission rateisabout5%inonecycleandisverysmallcomparedwiththefastreactors.In fast reactors, the direct fission of 237Np is rather large, and the 238Pu fission contributionisalsolarge.The239Pufissioncontributionissmallforfastreactors. Wearedevelopingacalculationcodesystembasedontheforegoingmethodand are planning to apply the system to MA transmutation core design. In the core design we consider a homogeneous MA loading core, and a heterogeneous MA loadingcore,inwhichMAisloadedinspecialassemblieswithmoderators. 17 MethodDevelopmentforCalculatingMinorActinideTransmutationinaFast... 187 Fig.17.7 Calculationexampleofoverallfissionrateof237Npbydevelopedcalculation.APWR advancedpressurizedwaterreactor 17.4 Sensitivity Calculation Method 17.4.1 Sensitivity to Infinite-Dilution Cross Section Core characteristics such as k , power distribution, and control rod worth are eff calculated by using effective cross section in deterministic methods. Sensitivities are usually calculated by using sensitivity calculation codes such as SAGEP [9], SAGEP-T[10],andSAINT[11].However,thesensitivitiesareforrelativechanges of effective cross sections. Here we derive a calculation method of sensitivities relative to infinite-dilution cross sections for fast reactor analysis. Usually the effective cross sections are calculated by using the Bondarenko self-shielding factor method, the subgroup method. In that method the effective cross sections areexpressedbytheinfinite-dilutioncrosssectionandtheself-shieldingfactorsf σe¼f (cid:3)σ ð17:10Þ Theself-shieldingfactorsdependonthebackgroundcrosssectionandtemperature. Thebackgroundcrosssectionfornuclidei0inahomogeneousmediumiscalculated bytheformula X 1 σbi0 ¼Ni0k6¼i0 Nk(cid:3)σtk ð17:11Þ whereN istheatomicnumberdensityoflightnuclidekandσk isthemicroscopic k t totalcrosssection.Thesensitivitycoefficientisdefinedbytherelativechangesof thecorecharacteristicscausedbytherelativechangesofthecrosssections.Herewe 188 T.Takedaetal. consider the following two sensitivities, the sensitivity S, which results from the relative change of the infinite-dilution cross sections, and the approximate sensi- e tivity S, which is the result of the relative change of the effective cross sections. FromEq.(17.10),thechangeoftheeffectivecrosssectioncanbeexpressedby dσe df dσ ¼ þ ð17:12Þ σe f σ Therefore, the improved sensitivity is expressed by using the approximate sensi- tivityasfollows: (cid:4) (cid:5) dR=R dR=R df=f S(cid:4) ¼ (cid:3) 1þ ð17:13Þ dσ=σ dσe=σe dσ=σ Sensitivitiesand cross sectionsare dependent on nuclides,reactiontypes(suchas fission, capture, and scattering), and energy groups. Here we consider the case where there is a perturbation in σ of nuclide i, reaction type j, in energy group g. Thisperturbationcausesachangeintheself-shieldingfactorfofnuclidei0,reaction j0,inenergygroupg0.Thesecondtermoftheright-handsideofEq.(17.14)hasto cover the contributions for all nuclides i0, reaction types j0, in energy groups g0; therefore,wehavetotakethesummationoveri0,j0,andg0.Thesensitivityforthe nuclidei,reactiontypej,inenergygroupgisgivenby XX dfi0=fi0 Si,j,g ¼eSi,j,gþ eSi0,j0,g0 (cid:3)dσji0=σj0i ð17:14Þ 0 0 j j i j The first term is the direct contribution to S; it can be calculated using the conventional tools evaluating sensitivity coefficients such as SAGEP, SAGEP-T, and SAINT. The second term represents the indirect contribution through the change of self-shielding factor. These coefficients can be calculated as follows: hereweapplytheresonanceapproximationforheavynuclides,whichissuitablefor treatingfastreactorswithhardneutronspectraratherthanlightwaterreactors.The self-shieldingeffectdependsontheneutronspectrum;wheretheneutronspectrum fortheheavynuclidei0 iswrittenas 1 1 ϕðEÞ/ (cid:3) ð17:15Þ σi0ðEÞþσi0 E t b Equation(17.15)indicatesthatwhenσi0(E)andσi0 changebythesamefactor,the t b neutronspectrumremainsthesame;thisshowsthattheratiohhasaneffectonthe neutronspectrum,andalsoontheself-shieldingfactor.Followingasimilarmethod [12],thecoefficientinthesecondtermoftheright-handsideofEq.(17.14)iscalled TERMandcanbewrittenas
Description: