Medical Law and Ethics The International Library of Essays in Law and Legal Theory Second Series Series Editor: Tom D. Campbell Titles in the Series: Freedom of Speech, Volumes I and II Anti-Discrimination Law Larry Alexander Christopher McCrudden Privacy Medical Law and Ethics Eric Barendt Sheila McLean Comparative Legal Cultures Mediation John Bell Carrie Menkel-Meadow Contract Law, Volumes I and II Environmental Law Brian Bix Peter S. Menell Corporate Law Criminal Law William W. Bratton Thomas Morawetz Law and Democracy Law and Language Tom D. Campbell and Adrienne Stone Thomas Morawetz Legal Positivism Law and Anthropology Tom D. Campbell Martha Mundy Administrative Law Gender and Justice Peter Cane Ngaire Naffine International Trade Law Law and Economics Ronald A. Cass and Michael S. Knoll Eric A. Posner Sociological Perspectives on Law, Japanese Law Volumes I and II J. Mark Ramseyer Roger Cotterrell Justice Intellectual Property Wojciech Sadurski Peter Drahos The Rule of Law Family, State and Law, Volumes I and II Frederick Schauer Michael D. Freeman Regulation Natural Law Colin Scott Robert P. George War Crimes Commercial Law Gerry Simpson Clayton P. Gillette Restitution Competition Law Lionel D. Smith Rosa Greaves Company Law and Society Chinese Law and Legal Theory David Sugar man Perry Keller Freedom of Information International Law, Volumes I and II Robert G Vaughn Martti Koskenniemi and David Kennedy Tort Law Constitutional Law Ernest J. Weinrib Ian D. Loveland Rights Interpretation of Law Robin West D. Neil MacCormick and Fernando Atria Welfare Law Human Rights Lucy A. Williams Robert McCorquodale Medical Law and Ethics Edited by Sheila McLean University of Glasgow, UK First published 2002 by Dartmouth Publishing Company and Ashgate Publishing Reissued 2018 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017, USA Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an info rm a business Copyright © Sheila McLean 2002. For copyright of individual articles please refer to the Acknowledgements. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe. Publisher's Note The publisher has gone to great lengths to ensure the quality of this reprint but points out that some imperfections in the original copies may be apparent. Disclaimer The publisher has made every effort to trace copyright holders and welcomes correspondence from those they have been unable to contact. A Library of Congress record exists under LC control number: 200 I 022937 ISBN 13: 978-1-138-73097-7 (hbk) ISBN 13: 978-1-315-18807-2 (ebk) Contents Acknowledgements vii Series Preface ix Introduction xi PART I NEGLIGENCE/CONSENT 1 Marjorie Maguire Shultz (1985), 'From Informed Consent to Patient Choice: A New Protected Interest', Yale Law Journal, 95, pp. 219-99. 3 2 Gerald Robertson (1981), 'Informed Consent to Medical Treatment', Law Quarterly Review, 97, pp. 102-26. 85 3 Danuta Mendelson (1996), 'Historical Evolution and Modern Implications of Concepts of Consent to, and Refusal of, Medical Treatment in the Law of Trespass', The Journal of Legal Medicine, 17, pp. 1-71. Ill 4 Allen Buchanan (1978), 'Medical Paternalism', Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1, pp. 370-90. 183 PART II REPRODUCTION 5 Ronald Dworkin (1993), 'The Morality of Abortion', in Ronald Dworkin (éd.), Life's Dominion, London: HarperCollins, pp. 30-67, 245-7. 207 6 Sheila A.M. McLean (1990), 'Abortion Law: Is Consensual Reform Possible?', Journal of Law and Society, 17, pp. 106-23. 249 7 David W. Meyers (1970), 'Compulsory Sterilisation and Castration', in David W. Meyers, The Human Body and the Law, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 26-47, 167-73. 267 8 Margaret Brazier (1999), 'Regulating the Reproduction Business?', Medical Law Review, 7, pp. 166-93. 297 9 Susan S. Mattingly (1992), 'The Maternal-Fetal Dyad: Exploring the Two-Patient Obstetric Model', Hastings Center Report, 92, January-February, pp. 13-18. 325 10 Dawn E. Johnsen (1986), 'The Creation of Fetal Rights: Conflicts with Women's Constitutional Rights to Liberty, Privacy, and Equal Protection', Yale Law Journal, 95, pp. 599-625. 331 11 George J. Annas (1988), 'She's Going to Die: The Case of Angela C\ Hastings Center Report, 88, February-March, pp. 23-5. 359 12 J.K. Mason (2000), 'Unwanted Pregnancy: A Case of Retroversion?', Edinburgh Law Review, 4, pp. 191-206. 363 vi Medical Law and Ethics PART III HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION AND RESEARCH 13 Henry K. Beecher (1966), 'Ethics and Clinical Research', New England Journal of Medicine, 274, pp. 1354-60. 381 14 Alastair V. Campbell (1989), 'A Report from New Zealand: An "Unfortunate Experiment" ', Bioethics, 3, pp. 59-66. 389 15 Ian Kennedy (1998), 'Research and Experimentation', in Ian Kennedy and Andrew Grubb (eds), Principles of Medical Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 714-46. 397 PART IV DEATH AND DYING 16 Helga Kuhse (1999), 'Some Reflections on the Problem of Advance Directives, Personhood, and Personal Identity', Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 9, pp. 347-64. 433 17 John A. Robertson (1991), 'Second Thoughts on Living Wills', Hastings Center Report, November-December, pp. 6-9. 451 18 Joanne Lynn and Joan M. Teno (1993), 'After the Patient Self-Determination Act: The Need for Empirical Research on Formal Advance Directives', Hastings Center Report, 23, January-February, pp. 20-24. 455 19 Linda L. Emanuel and Ezekiel J. Emanuel (1993), 'Decisions at the End of Life: Guided by Communities of Patients', Hastings Center Report, 23, September- October, pp. 6-14. 461 20 Ann Sommerville (1996), 'Are Advance Directives Really the Answer? And What was the Question?', in Sheila A.M. McLean (éd.), Death, Dying and the Law, Aldershot: Dartmouth, pp. 29^7. 471 21 John Keown (1995), 'Euthanasia in the Netherlands: Sliding Down the Slippery Slope?', in John Keown (éd.), Euthanasia Examined: Ethical, Clinical and Legal Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 261-96. 491 22 John Griffiths (1995), 'Assisted Suicide in the Netherlands: The Chabot Case', Modern Law Review, 58, pp. 232-48, 895-7. 527 23 Jonathan Glover (1977), 'Not Striving to Keep Alive', in Jonathan Glover (éd.), Causing Death and Saving Lives, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, pp. 92-116, 304-305. 547 Name Index 575 Acknowledgements The editor and publishers wish to thank the following for permission to use copyright material. Ashgate Publishing Limited for the essay: Ann Sommerville (1996), 'Are Advance Directives Really the Answer? And What was the Question?', in Sheila A.M. McLean (éd.), Death, Dying and the Law, Aldershot: Dartmouth, pp. 29-47. Blackwell Publishers for the essays: Sheila A.M. McLean (1990), 'Abortion Law: Is Consensual Reform Possible?', Journal of Law and Society, 17, pp. 106-23; Alastair V. Campbell (1989), 'A Report from New Zealand: An "Unfortunate Experiment'", Bioethics, 3, pp. 59-66; John Griffiths (1995), 'Assisted Suicide in the Netherlands: The Chabot Case', Modern Law Review, 58, pp. 232-48, 895-7. Copyright © 1995 The Modern Law Review. Cambridge University Press for the essay: John Keown (1995), 'Euthanasia in the Netherlands: Sliding Down the Slippery Slope?', in John Keown (éd.), Euthanasia Examined: Ethical, Clinical and Legal Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 261-96. HarperCollins Publishers for the essay: Ronald Dworkin (1993), 'The Morality of Abortion', in Ronald Dworkin (éd.), Life's Dominion, London: HarperCollins, pp. 30-67, 245-7. Hastings Center for the essays: Susan S. Mattingly (1992), 'The Maternal-Fetal Dyad: Exploring the Two-Patient Obstetric Model', Hastings Center Report, 92, January-February, pp. 13-18; George J. Annas (1988), 'She's Going to Die: The Case of Angela C\ Hastings Center Report, 88, February-March, pp. 23-5; John A. Robertson (1991), 'Second Thoughts on Living Wills', Hastings Center Report, November-December, pp. 6-9; Joanne Lynn and Joan M. Teno (1993), 'After the Patient Self-Determination Act: The Need for Empirical Research on Formal Advance Directives', Hastings Center Report, 23, January-February, pp. 20-24; Linda L. Emanuel and Ezekiel J. Emanuel (1993), 'Decisions at the End of Life: Guided by Communities of Patients', Hastings Center Report, 23, September-October, pp. 6-14. Copyright © Hastings Center. Johns Hopkins University Press for the essay: Helga Kuhse (1999), 'Some Reflections on the Problem of Advance Directives, Personhood, and Personal Identity', Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 9, pp. 347-64. Copyright © 1999 The Johns Hopkins University Press. Massachusetts Medical Society for the essay: Henry K. Beecher (1966), 'Ethics and Clinical Research', New England Journal of Medicine, 21 A, pp. 1354-60. Copyright © 1966 Massachusetts Medical Society. David W. Meyers (1970), 'Compulsory Sterilisation and Castration', in David W. Meyers, The Human Body and the Law, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 26-47, 167-73. Copyright © D.W. Meyers. VIU Medical Law and Ethics Oxford University Press for the essays: Margaret Brazier (1999), 'Regulating the Reproduction Business?', Medical Law Review, 1, pp. 166-93. Copyright © 1999 Oxford University Press; Ian Kennedy (1998), 'Research and Experimentation', in Ian Kennedy and Andrew Grubb (eds), Principles of Medical Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 714-46. Copyright © 1998 Oxford University Press. Reprinted from Principles of Medical Law, edited by Ian Kennedy and Andrew Grubb (1998) by permission of Oxford University Press. Penguin UK for the essay: Jonathan Glover (1977), 'Not Striving to Keep Alive', in Jonathan Glover (éd.), Causing Death and Saving Lives, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, Chapters 7 and 8, pp. 92-116, 304-305. Copyright © 1977 Jonathan Glover. Princeton University Press for the essay: Allen Buchanan (1978), 'Medical Paternalism', Philosophy and Public Affairs, 7, pp. 370-90. Copyright © 1978 Princeton University Press. Sweet & Maxwell Ltd for the essay: Gerald Robertson (1981), 'Informed Consent to Medical Treatment', Law Quarterly Review, 97, pp. 102-26. Taylor & Francis Ltd for the essay: Danuta Mendelson ( 1996), 'Historical Evolution and Modern Implications of Concepts of Consent to, and Refusal of, Medical Treatment in the Law of Trespass', The Journal of Legal Medicine, 17, pp. 1-71. http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals T&T Clark Ltd for the essay: J.K. Mason (2000), 'Unwanted Pregnancy: A Case of Retroversion?', Edinburgh Law Review, 4, pp. 191-206. Yale Law Journal for the essays: Marjorie Maguire Shultz (1985), 'From Informed Consent to Patient Choice: A New Protected Interest', Yale Law Journal, 95, pp. 219-99. Reprinted by permission of The Yale Law Journal Company and William S. Hein Company from The Yale Law Journal, 95, pp. 219-99; Dawn E. Johnsen (1986), 'The Creation of Fetal Rights: Conflicts with Women's Constitutional Rights to Liberty, Privacy, and Equal Protection', Yale Law Journal, 95, pp. 599-625. Reprinted by permission of The Yale Law Journal Company and William S. Hein Company from The Yale Law Journal, 95, pp. 599-625. Every effort has been made to trace all the copyright holders, but if any have been inadvertently overlooked the publishers will be pleased to make the necessary arrangement at the first opportunity. Preface to the Second Series The first series of the International Library of Essays in Law and Legal Theory has established itself as a major research resource with fifty-eight volumes of the most significant theoretical essays in contemporary legal studies. Each volume contains essays of central theoretical importance in its subject area and the series as a whole makes available an extensive range of valuable material of considerable interest to those involved in research, teaching and the study of law. The rapid growth of theoretically interesting scholarly work in law has created a demand for a second series which includes more recent publications of note and earlier essays to which renewed attention is being given. It also affords the opportunity to extend the areas of law covered in the first series. The new series follows the successful pattern of reproducing entire essays with the original page numbers as an aid to comprehensive research and accurate referencing. Editors have selected not only the most influential essays but also those which they consider to be of greatest continuing importance. The objective of the second series is to enlarge the scope of the library, include significant recent work and reflect a variety of editorial perspectives. Each volume is edited by an expert in the specific area who makes the selection on the basis of the quality, influence and significance of the essays, taking care to include essays which are not readily available. Each volume contains a substantial introduction explaining the context and significance of the essays selected. I am most grateful for the care which volume editors have taken in carrying out the complex task of selecting and presenting essays which meet the exacting criteria set for the series. TOM CAMPBELL Series Editor Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics Charles Sturt University