RESEARCHARTICLE Measures of cardiovascular autonomic activity in insomnia disorder: A systematic review Marina-MarinelaNano1,2,3*,PedroFonseca1,3,RikVullings1,RonaldM.Aarts1,3 1DepartmentofElectricalEngineering,EindhovenUniversityofTechnology,Eindhoven,TheNetherlands, 2SleepMedicineCentreKempenhaeghe,Heeze,TheNetherlands,3PhilipsResearch,HighTechCampus, Eindhoven,TheNetherlands a1111111111 *[email protected] a1111111111 a1111111111 a1111111111 Abstract a1111111111 Background Insomniadisorderisawidespreadsleepdisorderwithaprevalenceofapproximately10%. OPENACCESS Eventhoughthelinkbetweeninsomniaandcardiovascularactivityisnotexactlyclear,itis Citation:NanoM-M,FonsecaP,VullingsR,Aarts generallyassumedthatcardiovascularautonomicmodificationscouldoccurasaresultof RM(2017)Measuresofcardiovascularautonomic sleeplessness,or,alternatively,thatautonomicalterationscouldbeanexpressionofa activityininsomniadisorder:Asystematicreview. PLoSONE12(10):e0186716.https://doi.org/ hyper-arousalstate.Thisreviewinvestigateswhethercardiovascularmeasuresaredifferent 10.1371/journal.pone.0186716 betweeninsomniacsandcontrols. Editor:JacobusP.vanWouwe,TNO, NETHERLANDS Methods Received:June16,2017 Electronicdatabasesweresystematicallysearched,and34studieswereidentified.Heart Accepted:October8,2017 ratevariabilityfeatures,theassociationofcardiacandEEGactivity,physiologiccomplexity measures,andcardiovascularactivity,assessedbymeasuressuchaspre-ejectiontime, Published:October23,2017 bloodpressure,andheartratedynamicswerestudied.Giventheheterogeneityofthestud- Copyright:©2017Nanoetal.Thisisanopen ies,anarrativesynthesisofthefindingswasperformed. accessarticledistributedunderthetermsofthe CreativeCommonsAttributionLicense,which permitsunrestricteduse,distribution,and Results reproductioninanymedium,providedtheoriginal authorandsourcearecredited. Thisreviewstudyfoundoveralldifferencesincardiovascularactivitybetweeninsomniacs andcontrolsinmostoftheobservationalstudies(21/26),whiletheexpressionofcardiovas- DataAvailabilityStatement:Allrelevantdataare withinthepaperanditsSupportingInformation cularregulationvariedbetweentheexaminedinsomniacgroups.Allthestudiesthatinvesti- files. gatedtheassociationofcardiacactivityandEEGpowerreportedanalteredrelation Funding:ThisworkhasbeendoneintheIMPULS betweenautonomicactivityandEEGparametersininsomniacs. framework(EindhovenUniversityofTechnology, PhilipsResearch,SleepMedicineCentre Conclusion Kempenhaeghe).Thefundershadnoroleinthe studydesign,decisiontopublish,orpreparationof Autonomicregulationtendstobeconsistentbetweeninsomniacs,aslongastheyare themanuscript.PhilipsResearchprovidedsupport groupedaccordingtotheirrespectivephenotype,asshownintheinsomniasubgroupwith intheformofsalariesforauthorsPFandRMA,but objectivelyshortsleepduration.Ourhypothesisisthatthesedifferencesintheexpression didnothaveanyadditionalroleinthestudydesign, datacollectionandanalysis,decisiontopublish,or ofcardiovascularactivitycouldbeexplainedbytheheterogeneityofthedisorder.Therefore, PLOSONE|https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186716 October23,2017 1/31 Cardiovascularautonomicactivityininsomniadisorder preparationofthemanuscript.Thespecificrolesof thedeterminationofinsomniaphenotypes,andthestudyofcardiovascularmeasures, theseauthorsarearticulatedinthe‘author ratherthanheartratevariabilityalone,willgivemoreinsightintothelinkbetweeninsomnia contributions’section. andcardiovascularregulation.Thisstudysuggeststhatcardiovascularactivitydiffers Competinginterests:M-MN,PFandRMAdeclare betweeninsomniacsandcontrols.Thesenewfindingsareofinteresttocliniciansand tobeaffiliatedwithPhilipsResearch.RVreports researchersforamoreaccurateinsomniaassessment,andthedevelopmentofpersonal- otherfromNemoHealthcare,outsidehissubmitted work.ThisdoesnotalterouradherencetoallPLOS izedtechnologicalsolutionsininsomnia. ONEpoliciesonsharingdataandmaterials. Introduction Difficultiesinitiatingormaintainingsleepareveryprevalentsleepcomplaintsinthegeneral population[1,2].Ifsleeplessnessmeetspecificdiagnosticcriteriatheterminsomniadisorder isused.MultinationalstudiesthatusedtheDiagnosticandStatisticalManualofMentalDisor- dersfourthedition(DSM-IV)criteriareportedprevalenceratesofinsomniadisorderthat rangefrom3.9%to22.1%,withanaverageofapproximately10%[3].Thisisabroadrange thatreflectsdifferentmodalitiesofinvestigationandthepopulationunderstudy[1].Informa- tionfromnewstudiesontheprevalenceofinsomniadisorderusingDSM-Vcriteria,iscur- rentlylimited. OnthelatestupdateofDSM,insomniadisorderisdefinedasapredominantcomplaintof dissatisfactionwithsleepqualityordurationandisaccompaniedbydifficultiesininitiating sleepatbedtime,frequentorprolongedawakenings,orearly-morningawakening,withan inabilitytoreturntosleep[4].Thissleepdisturbancecausesclinicallysignificantsocial,occu- pational,educational,academic,andbehavioraldistressorimpairment.Thesedifficulties occurdespiteadequateopportunityforsleep.Diagnosisofinsomniaismadewhensleepdiffi- cultiesarepresentfor3ormorenightsperweek,andlastformorethan3months[4].Thus, insomniaisaconditioncharacterizedbybothnocturnalanddiurnalsymptoms. Thecardiovascularautonomicnervoussystem(ANS)appearstobecloselylinkedtosleep andcircadianphysiology,asdemonstratedbythedisruptedautonomiccontrolthataccompa- niessleeploss[5].Additionally,autonomicactivityisintegratedwithcognitionandemotion, amongothers[6].Sleeplossordeficiencycanusuallyoccursasaresultofsleepdeprivation, sleepfragmentation,ordifficultyoffallingasleep.Ininsomniadisordersleeplossisusually causedbydifficultiesofmaintaining(fragmentedsleep)orinitiatingsleep.Inadditiontosleep loss,insomniadisorderisfrequentlyaccompaniedbyvariouschanges,suchascognitive arousal/stress,degradedmood,depressionoranxietyandfatigue[7].Todate,twomajor hypotheseshavebeenmadeaboutthelinkbetweenautonomicfunctionandinsomnia[8]. Accordingtothefirsthypothesis,autonomicmodificationscouldoccurasaresultofsleep fragmentation[9].Thishypothesisissupportedbystudiesshowingthatautonomicarousals withoutcorticalinvolvementareanepiphenomenonofsleepfragmentationandalteredsleep continuity[9].Furthermore,autonomicsleepfragmentationhasbeenlinkedtodiurnal increaseinsympatheticactivityandelevatedbloodpressure(BP)inhealthyelderly[10]. Accordingtothesecondhypothesis,autonomicalterationscouldbeanexpressionofahyper- arousalstate[8].Evidenceofanincreaseinheartrate(HR)andtheabsenceofanormaldrop inautonomicactivityduringfallingasleep,alongwithalterationsofotherphysiologicparame- ters(e.g.bodytemperatures,stresshormones),couldbeconsideredindicatorsofastateof arousalthatpredisposestheindividualtopoorsleep[11–13].Therefore,relevantphysiology dataobtainedbycardiovascularANSmeasuresmayprovidenewinsightintothelinkbetween insomniadisorderandcardiovascularautonomicactivity. PLOSONE|https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186716 October23,2017 2/31 Cardiovascularautonomicactivityininsomniadisorder Whiletworeviews[14,15]examiningheartratevariability(HRV)andonereview[16] investigatingcardiovasculardysfunctionbetweennormalsleepandsleepdisordershavebeen published,theirprimaryfocuswasnotinsomniadisorder,sofindingsregardinginsomnia werenotmethodicallyincorporated.Onereview[17]focusingexclusivelyonHRVandinsom- niawasrecentlypublished.Cardiovascularactivity,comparedtoHRValone,providesamore completeoverviewoftheautonomicactivity.Forinstance,studieshaveshownthattheuseof HRVfortheestimationofautonomicregulationhaslimitations[18]andadditionaldiagnostic valuecanbeobtainedfrommeasuressuchaspre-ejectionperiod(PEP)[19].Inthisstudy,we donotrestrictthereviewtoHRV,asDoddsetal.[17]did,butalsoincorporateothercardio- vascularmeasuresofautonomicactivity,suchasPEP,cardiopulmonarycoupling(CPC),left ventricularejectiontime,BPandHRslopefortheanalysisofHRdynamicsinordertoinvesti- gatewhethercardiovascularactivitymeasuresaredifferentbetweeninsomniacsandcontrols. Inaddition,weaimtoexaminehowinterventionsinfluencecardiovascularactivity. Methods Searchstrategy Forthisreview,thePubMedandScopuselectronicdatabasesweresystematicallysearchedfor articlespublisheduntil9thofOctober2016,usingkeywordstoidentifyallstudiesspecifically designedtodefinecardiovasculardifferencesbetweeninsomniacsandhealthycontrols.A searchofpublicationswasconductedusingthefollowingmedicalsubjectheadingsorkey words:“heartrate”,“cardiac”,“cardio”,“bloodpressure”,“autonomic”,“sympathetic”,“para- sympathetic”,“arterial”,“vascular”,“baroreflex”and“insomnia”.Basedonsearchoptionspro- videdbythetwoelectronicdatabases,thesearchapproachwasadjustedasshowninS1 Appendix.Toensureliteraturesaturation,weexaminedthereferencelistsoftheincluded papersandoftherelevantreviewswhichwereidentifiedbythesearch.Theliteraturesearch waslimitedtostudiesconductedwithhumanparticipants,publishedintheEnglishlanguage. Studyselection Inordertoidentifyrelevantpublications,thefollowingcriteriawereappliedintheinitial stagesofthescrutinyprocess:(1)participantswereadult((cid:21)18yearsold),(2)studiesinclude adultsparticipantsdiagnosedwithinsomnia(observational)ortreatedforinsomnia(interven- tional),(3)comparisonofinsomniacswithcontrolgroup(observationalstudies)orsame groupofinsomniacsbeforeandafterintervention(interventionalstudies),and(4)observa- tionalstudiesincludenon-invasivetechniques,butnotinvitrotests,suchassalivatest.Articles meetingthesecriteriawerecollectedanddatawasextractedforanalysisbythefirstauthor. Afterduplicateremovalstudieswerereviewedforeligibilityusingtitle,abstractandfulltext whenitwasrequired. Cardiovascularmeasuresusedtoexploreautonomicchangesandtheir physiologicalsignificanceinterpretation Inthissection,cardiovascularmeasuresusedinliteraturetoinvestigateandstudyautonomic changesareintroduced.Additionally,theirphysiologicalinterpretationispresented. Overthepastyears,differentmethodsofcardiovascularautonomicactivityandHRVquan- tificationhavebeendeveloped,suchasfrequency,time-frequency,temporal,geometrical,and nonlinearanalysis[20].Autonomiccardiovascularmeasurescanbeexaminedtraditionally throughthequantificationofaverageHRandBP[5]andmorerecentlythroughnon-linear approachesbyusingdetrendedfluctuationanalysis(DFA),[21]entropyderived[15,22–24], PLOSONE|https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186716 October23,2017 3/31 Cardiovascularautonomicactivityininsomniadisorder Table1.Summaryoftimedomaincardiovascularmeasuresandtheirphysiologicalinterpretation. Feature Description ANSinterpretation Study PEP thetimefromtheonsetoftheECGQ-wavetotheopeningofthe amarkerofbeta-adrenergicsympatheticactivity [12,59–64] aorticvalve RPP theproductofHRandSBP indexoftheoverallcardiacworkload [63] SDNN standarddeviationofRRorNNintervalsforadesiredperiodand bothsympatheticandparasympatheticactivityand [8,13,47,60, ismeasuredinms thereforeprovidesanindexofoverallHRV 64–67] RMSSD squarerootofthemeansquareddifferencesofsuccessiveNN parasympatheticactivity [8,13,47,60, intervalsforadesiredperiod,measuredinms 61,64–67] pNN50 percentageofsuccessiveNNintervalsthatdiffermorethan50 parasympatheticactivity [8,13,60,64– ms 66] Abbreviations—ANS:Autonomicnervoussystem,ECG:electrocardiogram,HRV:heartratevariability,ms:milliseconds,PEP:pre-ejectiontime,RPP:rate pressureproduct,RRtimeseries:thetimeelapsedbetweentwosuccessiveR-wavesoftheQRScomplexontheelectrocardiogram,study:representsthe studiesthatthefeaturewasused,Note:Abbreviationnotmentionedherearedescribedinthe“Description”columnofthetable. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186716.t001 Poincare´Plot[25],andLempel-Ziv[26,27]measures.Asdescribedindetailpreviously[5], HRandBPvariationscanbeexpressedbythestandarddeviationaroundthemean,orbytheir rhythmicandnon-rhythmiccomponents.RRtimeseries(thetimeelapsedbetweentwosuc- cessiveR-wavesoftheQRScomplexontheelectrocardiogram(ECG))andBPalsoshow short-termoscillationsinafrequencyrangebetween0and0.5Hz.Traditionally,HRVand cardiovascularparametersaremeasuredinthetimeandfrequencydomain. StandardHRVanalysishasbeenwellsummarizedbythetaskforceoftheEuropeansociety ofcardiology[28].ThemostcommonlyusedtimedomainmeasuresaredescribedinTable1. Ratepressureproduct(RPP)isanindexoftheoverallcardiacworkload[29],andiscalculated asfollows:HR(cid:3)systolicBP/100[30].HRandBPphysiologicallydecreaseatnight,compared toduringtheday.SystolicBPreductionatleast10%duringsleep,comparedtodaytime,is commonlyreferredtoas“dipping”.ThePEPisinfluencedbysympatheticactivity[5]. Inthefrequencydomain,HRVisevaluatedbyspectralanalysis.Asdescribedindetailpre- viously[5,28,31],spectralanalysisofRRintervalsandBPvariabilitygivesinformationon howpowerofthesignalisdistributedasafunctionofthefrequency.KayandMarplepre- sentedanextensivesummaryofseveraltechniquesusedforspectralanalysis[32].Methodsfor powerspectraldensityestimationcanbegenerallyclassifiedasnon-parametricandparametric [28].Thetwomostcommonapproaches[33,34]usedforspectralanalysisofRRtimeseries areFouriertransform(FFT)[31]andautoregressivemodel(AR)[35].Thehighfrequency power(HF)components(0.15-0.4Hz)reflecttherespiration-drivenmodulationofsinus rhythm,andhavebeenusedasanindexoftonicvagaldrive[5,28,31,34,36,37].Thephysio- logicalsignificanceoftheverylowfrequency(VLF)componentisstillunclear,andlimited datasuggestthatitmightreflectvagalandrein-angiotensinsystemeffectsonHR[14,28,31, 34].Thephysiologicalinterpretationofthelowfrequency(LF)powercomponents(0.04-0.15 Hz)iscontroversial.Somestudies[28,31,38]supporttheconclusionthatLFpowerisconsid- eredtoreflectbothsympatheticandvagalmodulationoftheheart,whileotherstudies[5,39] indicatethatitmightbeanindexofthebaroreflexsensitivity(BRS)forcontrolofHR.More- over,forsomeresearchers[28,37,40,41],LFisseenasamarkerofsympatheticmodulation, particularlywhenitisexpressedinnormalizedunits.LFrhythmcanalsobemodulatedby irregularbreathingpatterns[5].Consequently,theLF/HFratioisconsideredbysome researcherstoexpresssympatho-vagalbalance,andbyothers,toreflectonlysympathetic PLOSONE|https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186716 October23,2017 4/31 Cardiovascularautonomicactivityininsomniadisorder modulations[28].ItshouldbenotedthatEckbergetal.[42]questionedtheuseoftheLFasan indicatorofsympatho-vagaltonebalance.Asdescribedpreviously[28],thesedisagreements intheinterpretationofLFcanbeattributedtothefactthatseveralconditionsassociatedwith sympatheticactivation,cancauseadecreaseintheabsolutepoweroftheLFcomponent.For example,duringsympatheticactivation,tachycardiafollows,andisusuallycharacterizedbya reductionintotalpower,whiletheoppositehappensduringvagalactivation[28].Inthisway, whentheLFismeasuredinmillisecondssquared,thevariationsintotalpoweraffectLFand HFinthesamedirection(fordetailssee[28]).Duetothereductionintotalpower,LFcould remainunalteredifitismeasuredinmillisecondssquared.Nevertheless,ifnormalizationis performed,anincreaseinLFbecomesmoreevident[28].Otherreasonsthatcouldexplainthis discrepancyincludethefactthatrespirationparametersandbehaviorareinfluencedbyage andactivity,amongothers.Forinstance,duringtasks,individualdifferencesmightexhibita widerangeofspontaneousbreathingrates,whichmayresultinacontributiontotheHFband byindividualswithfasterbreathingfrequencies,andacontributiontotheLFbandbyindivid- ualswithslowerbreathingfrequencies[43]. RegardingBPvariability,LF componentsinsystolicBPvariabilityareconsideredan BP indexofefferentsympatheticvascularmodulation,whereastheHF componentsexpress BP mechanicaleffectsofrespirationonbloodpressurechanges[5].BRSregulatesBPinorderto preservestability.BRScanbemeasuredbyeitherprovocationofthecarotidbaroreceptors withphenylephrineorbythespectraltechniquewhichquantifiesspontaneousfluctuationsof thesystolicbloodpressurespectralpowerandthecorrespondingRRtimeseriesspectral powerindifferentfrequencybands[44–46].Thelatterapproachwasfirstintroducedby Robbeetal.[45]andisusedbytheauthorsofthereviewedstudies[47].TheαBRSiscomputed usingthesquarerootoftheratioofRRtimeseriesandsystolicBPpowerspectraintheLFand HFbands(αLFandαHF)[47–49].Theα-indexiscomputedonlywhenthesquaredcoherence function(k2)ofthesystolicBPandRRtimeseriesexceeded0.56[47–49].αTotalisdefinedas themeanofαLFandαHF.TF-BRS(theevaluationofthetransferfunctionbetweentimeseries ofsystolicBPandRRtimeseries)iscomputedbyaveragingthegainfunctionintheLFband regardlessofagivencoherencebetweensystolicBPandRRtimeseries[47,48,50].TheαLF describesthegainoftherelationbetweentheBPandRRtimeseriespowerspectraintheLF band[47,48,50].TheαLFcomponentdescribesthegaininthespectralbandoftherespiration frequency.αTotalgivesanassessmentoftheoverallbaroreceptorgain[51]. Recently,newmethodshavebeenusedfortheanalysisofHRV,inordertoconsiderthe non-stationarycharacteristicsoftheECGsignalandthenon-linearfluctuationsinHR.These techniquesattempttocharacterizecardiovascularANSintermsofregularityandcomplexity, basedoninformationcarriedbyRRtimeseriesthroughtheuseofentropyderivedandLem- pel-Zivmeasures[22,23,26,27].Sampleentropyisthenegativelogarithmofconditional probabilityofthesequencesofRRtimeseries.Highsampleentropyshowsthatthereisalow probabilityofrepeatedsequencesintheRRtimeseries,whichmeanslowerregularityand morecomplexityintheRRtimeseries[22,52].Multiscaleentropyisestimatedbasedonthe computationofthesampleentropyoverarangeoftemporalscales[23](Formoredetails aboutsampleandmultiscaleentropysee[22,23]).TheLempel-Zivcomplexityalgorithmpro- videsinformationregardingthecomplexityofRRtimeseries[27].Complexityisrelatedtothe numberofdistinctpatternsalongtheRRtimeseriesandtherateoftheiroccurrencewithina givensequence[26].(FormoredetailsregardingtheLempel-Zivcomplexityalgorithmand thecodingprocedureusedinthereviewedstudiessee[53,54]).Detrendedfluctuationanalysis (DFA)examinesthefractalscalingpropertiesofHRfluctuationsinthenon-stationaryRR timeseriesondifferenttimescalesforthedetectionoflong-rangecorrelationbetweentheRR intervals[21].CPCwasintroducedbyThomasetal.[55]astheproductofthecoherenceand PLOSONE|https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186716 October23,2017 5/31 Cardiovascularautonomicactivityininsomniadisorder Table2.Summaryofnonlinearcardiovascularmeasures. Feature Description Study entropyofRRtimeseries anon-linearmeasurewhichexaminestheregularityofRRtime [53, seriesanditincreaseswithgreaterdegreeofirregularityreachinga 68] maximumatcompletelyrandomsystem Lempel-Zivcomplexityof anon-linearmeasurethatestimatesthecomplexityofRRtime [53] RRtimeseries seriesandquantifiestherateofnewpatternsalongthesequence DFAofRRtimeseries anon-linearmeasurethatcharacterizesthepatternofvariationand [53] long-rangecorrelationsofRRtimeseriesacrossmultipletime scales Abbreviations—DFA:detrendedfluctuationanalysis,RRtimeseries:thetimeelapsedbetweentwo successiveR-wavesoftheQRScomplexontheelectrocardiogram,study:representsthestudiesthatthe featurewasused,Note:Abbreviationnotmentionedherearedescribedinthe“Description”columnofthe table. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186716.t002 cross-spectralpoweroftheRRorNNtimeseriesandtheECG-derivedrespiratorytimeseries. ECG-spectrographicvariableswerefoundtocorrelatestronglywithEEGmeasuresofsleep stability,suggestingthattheresultingsleepspectrogramcanclassifysleepas“stable”(high-fre- quencycouplingband(0.1—0.4Hz)(HFC))and“unstable”(low-frequencycouplingband (0.1—0.4Hz)(LFC))[55–57].Thecardiovascularmeasuresandtheirinterpretationthatare usedinthereviewedstudiesarepresentedinTables1,2and3.Fordetailsaboutthe Table3.Summaryofthefrequencycardiovascularmeasuresandtheirphysiologicalinterpretation. Feature Description ANSinterpretation Study Total varianceofallRRorNNintervalsmeasuredinms2 [59,60] power VLF Lowfrequencypower(0.003—0.04Hz)measuredinms2 parasympatheticactivityandrenin- [68] angiotensinsystemeffectsonHR LF verylowfrequencypower(0.04—0.15Hz)measuredinms2 measurethatincludesbothsympathetic [8,11–13,47,59,60, andvagalinfluence* 64–67,69–78] LF lowfrequencypower(0.04—0.15Hz)normalizedusingtotalpower markerofsympatheticmodulation* [8,11–13,47,59,60, norm 64–67,69–78] HF highfrequencypower(0.15—0.4Hz)measuredinms2 markerofparasympathetic/vagalactivity [8,13,47,60,64–67] HF highfrequencypower(0.15—0.4Hz)normalizedusingtotalpower markerofparasympathetic/vagalactivity [8,13,47,60,64–67] norm LF/HF ratioofLFtoHF reflectssympatho/vagalbalanceor [8,11,13,59,60,64– sympatheticmodulations* 67,69–71,73–77] 1/f slopeofthepower-lowregressionlineofRRtimeseriesfittedtothe [53] powerspectrumforf<0.01Hz CPC theproductofthecoherenceandcross-spectralpoweroftheRRorNN [57] timeseriesandtheECG-derivedrespiratorytimeseries αLF thesquaredrootoftheratioofRRtimeseriesandsystolicBPpower [47] spectrainthe(0.04-0.15Hz)frequencybandmeasuredinms/mmHg αHF thesquaredrootoftheratioofRRtimeseriesandsystolicBPpower [47] spectrainthe(0.15-0.4Hz)frequencybandmeasuredinms/mmHg αTotal meanofαLFandαHFmeasuredinms/mmHg [47] Abbreviations—ANS:autonomicnervoussystem,CPC:cardiopulmonarycoupling,HRV:heartratevariability,mmHg:millimeterofmercury,ms: milliseconds,Totalpower:varianceofallNNorRRintervals,study:representsthestudiesthatthefeaturewasused *:theinterpretationiscontroversial,Note:Abbreviationnotmentionedherearedescribedinthe“Description”columnofthetable. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186716.t003 PLOSONE|https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186716 October23,2017 6/31 Cardiovascularautonomicactivityininsomniadisorder Fig1.Studysearchandselectionformeasuresofcardiovascularactivityininsomniacsandcontrols. ModifiedPRISMA2009flowdiagram[89]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186716.g001 descriptionandANSinterpretationcolumnsoftheTables1,2,and3pleasesee[5,14,21–23, 28,47–51,53–55,58]. Results Reviewedstudies Theinitialcombineddatabasesearchgenerated709records.Afterduplicateremovaland Englishlanguagerestriction,427electronicrecordswereidentifiedandscreenedforeligibility. Themanualsearchofreferencelistsofrelevantpapersandreviewsidentifiedthreepapers [53,64,72].Threeadditionalstudies[79–81]wereaddedtoexplainthetransitionfrom“poor” sleeperstoclinicallydefinedinsomniacs.Thevastmajorityofthesearticles(n=366)were excludedbytitleorabstractalone(seeFig1)basedoncriteriamentionedearlier.Fulltextarti- cleswereobtainedforthe61remainingarticles.Ultimately,34studieswereidentifiedthatmet theinclusioncriteriaforthisreview.Twentysixobservationalstudies([8,11–13,47,53,57, 59–63,65,66,68–73,82–87])andeightinterventionalstudies([64,67,74–78,88]).Study detailssuchasdiagnosticcriteria,demographics,numberofparticipants,insomniaseverity, andtypeofinterventionarepresentedinTables4and5. Observationalstudies Studieswithoutspecificdiagnosticcriteriaforinsomniadisorder. Instudieswithout specificdiagnosticcriteriaforinsomniadisorder,physiologicaldifferencesduringsleepwere investigatedbetweenthe“poor”and“good”sleepergroups[79],aswellassubjectswithsleep- PLOSONE|https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186716 October23,2017 7/31 Cardiovascularautonomicactivityininsomniadisorder Table4.Characteristicsofthe26observationalstudies. Authors Sample,SexAge Diagnosticcriteria InsomniaSeverity SleepEfficiency Monitoringandanalysis (mean±std, (Insomniacs- details range) Controls) Stepanski Insomniacs: DIMS(psychophysiologicalor ND <85%—>90% Monitoringtime:duringsleep etal.[82] 24M idiopathicinsomnia)andSE<85% (PSGof1night) andamorningtask,ECG 34.5±8.3,ND ononePSGnight samplingrate:ND,Periodof analysis:averagedoveran Controls: hour,Spectralanalysis 25M technique:Notapplicable 34.0±7.6,ND Bonnetetal. Insomniacs: Subjectivelyreportedinsomnia Insomniacssubjectively 82±11%—93 Monitoringtime:during [11] 12(M&F) for(cid:21)4nightsperweekforayear reported:i)asleepproblem; ±3.2% sleep,ECGsamplingrate: 31.2±6.8,ND AND(SOL>30minorSE<85%)on ii)(SOL(cid:21)45minOR 500Hz,Periodofanalysis:5 bothPSGnights WASO(cid:21)60min)for(cid:21)4 min,Spectralanalysis Controls: nightsperweekandiii) technique:BMDPTl 25(M&F) condition>1year Program 29.1±5.2,ND deZambotti Insomniacs: DSM-IVcriteriaforprimary PSQI:9.67±1.67,AIS: 91(±5)%—96 Monitoringtime:during etal.[59] 9(4M) insomniaandsubjectivelyreported 10.00±3.16,HS:44.56± (±3)% sleep,ECGsamplingrate: 23.0±2.4,20-26 insomniahistoryfor(cid:21)1year 4.03 500Hz,Periodofanalysis:2 min,Spectralanalysis Controls: technique:FFT 9(4M) 23.6±3.2,19-28 deZambotti Insomniacs: ResearchDiagnosticCriteriafor PSQI:10.0±2.0,AIS:15.8 87.1(±8.4)%— Monitoringtime:during etal.[60] 13(8F) primaryinsomniaand(PSQI(cid:21)5, ±3.3,Lengthofinsomnia 94.0(±3.9)% sleep,ECGsamplingrate: 23.0±2.4,20-28 ISI(cid:21)11) (months):58.5±39.9 512Hz,Periodofanalysis:2 mininfrequencydomainand Controls: 5minintimedomain, 14(7F) Spectralanalysistechnique: 23.6±3.2,23-28 FFT Spiegelhalder Insomniacs: DSM-IV.Forsecondanalysis: PSQI:11.2±2.8,BDI:9.7 85.8(±9.8)%— Monitoringtime:during etal.[13] 58(36F) INSDSE(cid:21)85%vsISSD ±6.6,Lengthofinsomnia 89.0(±9.2)% sleep,ECGsamplingrate: 39.5±11.8,ND SE<85%basedonPSG (years):10.9±9.9 (2ndPSGnight) 400Hz,Periodofanalysis:5 min,Spectralanalysis Controls: technique:FFT 48(27F) 37.3±11.4,ND Bianchietal. Insomniacs: ND—subjectsunderwent ND ND Monitoringtime:during [53] 11(M&F) polysomnographicevaluation sleep,ECGsamplingrate: 39.5±11.8,35-50 128Hz,Periodofanalysis: ND,Spectralanalysis Controls: technique:ND 17(M&F) 37.3±11.4,40-50 Jurystaal.[69] Insomniacs: DSMIVandICSD-R(revised NDclearly.Availablesleep 74(±9)%—90 Monitoringtime:during 14M edition)forchronicprimary characteristicsforrevision (±3)% sleep,ECGsamplingrate: 42±12,16-63 insomnia,subjectivecomplaints 200Hz,Periodofanalysis:2 for(cid:21)1month,SE<85% min,Spectralanalysis Controls: technique:FFT 14M 41±10,16-55 Farinaal.[8] Insomniacs: ICSD-2forprimaryinsomnia Meandurationof 82.4(±22)%— Monitoringtime:during 85(38M) insomnia>2years 86.9(±14.2)% sleep,ECGsamplingrate: 53.2±13.6,27-81 256Hz,Periodofanalysis:5 min,Spectralanalysis Controls: technique:Autoregressive 55(23M) Model 54.2±13.9,27-76 (Continued) PLOSONE|https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186716 October23,2017 8/31 Cardiovascularautonomicactivityininsomniadisorder Table4. (Continued) Authors Sample,SexAge Diagnosticcriteria InsomniaSeverity SleepEfficiency Monitoringandanalysis (mean±std, (Insomniacs- details range) Controls) Mazzaetal. Insomniacs: Diagnosisofchronic ValidatedItalianversionof 86.2(±8.5)%— Monitoringtime:during [70] 6(2F) benzodiazepineabuseaccording thePSQI>5,ESS>6 92.0(±5.3)% sleep,ECGsamplingrate: 53.3±14.9,34-70 totheDSM-IV-TR.Inallcases ND,Periodofanalysis:ND, patientswereinitiallyprescribed Spectralanalysistechnique: Controls: forthetreatmentofchronic AutoregressiveModel 55(32F) insomnia 54.2±13.0,27-76 Lanfranchi Insomniacs: DSM-IV-Rforchronicinsomnia Allsubjectssufferedfrom 65(±12)%—92 Monitoringtime:during etal.[83] 13(9F) andmeetthefollowingcriteria: mixed(difficultiesinitiating (±7)% daytimeandsleep,ECG 42±9,30-60 SubjectivelyreportedSOLand/or andmaintainingsleep) samplingrate:256Hz, WASO>30min,TST<6.5h, insomnia,ISI:18.2±2.1, Periodofanalysis:averaged Controls: SE<85%ii)presenceof BDI:9.5±2.1 overonehour,Spectral 13(9F) insomnia(cid:21)3nightsperweek analysistechnique:NA 42±7,30-60 for(cid:21)6monthsiii)ISI(cid:21)15 Fangetal.[65] Insomniacs: DSM-IVforprimaryinsomniaand SubjectivelyreportedSOL 90.2(±4.8)%— Monitoringtime:during 18(6M) atleastoneofthefollowingcriteria and/orWASO>30min, 96.9(±2.1)% daytime,ECGsamplingrate: 34.2±14.5,20-60 onbothactigraphyanddiary TST<6.5,SE<85%b) (basedon 500Hz,Periodofanalysis:5 measures:i)WASO>30min,ii) presenceofinsomnia(cid:21)3 actigraphy) min,Spectralanalysis Controls: TST(cid:20)6.5h,ii)SE(cid:20)85% nightsperweekfor(cid:21)6 technique:FFT 21(7M) months(c)ISI(cid:21)15.23 27.8±8.7,20-50 Varkevisser Insomniacs: ICSD-Rforchronic Availablecharacteristics 73.3(±3.6)%— Monitoringtime:during etal.[61] 11(6M) psychophysiologicinsomnia(with (basedonactigraphy)for 82.3(±6.7)% daytime,ECGsamplingrate: 43.8±8.9,31-54 ambulatoryPSG) revision (basedon 1000Hz,Periodofanalysis: actigraphy) averagedover30sec Controls: segments,Spectralanalysis 13(7M) technique:NA 44.9±7.7,33-53 Yangetal.[68] Insomniacs: DSM-IVforprimaryinsomnia PSQI:10.7±3.9,BDI: ND Monitoringtime:during 47(4M) 10.9±6.5.Available daytimeandsleep,ECG 41.6±11.7,23-63 characteristicsforrevision samplingrate:ND,Periodof analysis:ND,Spectral Controls: analysistechnique:ND 88(4M) 24.8±2.7,22-64 Floametal. Insomniacs: DSM-Vforprimaryinsomnia PSQI:11.2±0.7,insomnia ND Monitoringtime:during [84] 29(19F) disorder duration(years):6.4±0.8, daytime,ECGsamplingrate: 25.3±1.6,18-55 actigraphybasedSOL: NA,Periodofanalysis: 27±4,WASO:30±3,SFI: averageofthe5 Controls: 15.5±1.4 measurementsovera 19(13F) 15-minperiodSpectral 25.4±1.4,ND analysistechnique:NA Covassinetal. Insomniacs: DSM-IVforprimaryinsomniaforat Insomniaforatleast1year 90.6(±5.1)%— Monitoringtime:during [62] 8(4M) least1yearandPSQI:(cid:21)6, andPSQI:9.6±1.3,AIS 96.3(±2.4)% daytime,ECGsamplingrate: 22.9±2.4,ND AIS(cid:21)6,ISI:(cid:21)11 10.8±2.4,ISI:14.0±2.7, 500Hz,Periodofanalysis: SOL:16.9±14.7,WASO: averagedover30sec Controls: 27.1±19.1 segments,Spectralanalysis 8(4M) technique:NA 24.8±2.7,ND Jiangetal.[66] Insomniacs: DSM-IVforprimaryinsomnia PSQI:8.6±2.3 ND Monitoringtime:during 55(25M) daytime,ECGsamplingrate: 30.4±8.4,22-38 ND,Periodofanalysis:ND, Spectralanalysistechnique: Controls: ND 63(29M) 31.3±7.7,23-39 (Continued) PLOSONE|https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186716 October23,2017 9/31 Cardiovascularautonomicactivityininsomniadisorder Table4. (Continued) Authors Sample,SexAge Diagnosticcriteria InsomniaSeverity SleepEfficiency Monitoringandanalysis (mean±std, (Insomniacs- details range) Controls) Cellinietal. Insomniacs: ResearchDiagnosticCriteriafor PSQI:10.0±2.0,AIS: 87(±8)%—95 Monitoringtime:during [63] 13(8F) primaryinsomnia,subjectively 15.77±3.27,SOL: (±3)% daytime,ECGsamplingrate: 24.4±1.6,20-28 reportedsymptoms±6months 16.19±16.42,WASO: 512Hz,Periodofanalysis:3 and(PSQI(cid:21)5,ISI(cid:21)11) 45.88±30.17 min,Spectralanalysis Controls: technique:FFT 14(6F) 23.3±2.5,20-28 Baglionietal. Insomniacs: DSM-IV ISI:12.09±3.32 ND Monitoringtime:during [85] 21(19F) daytime,ECGsamplingrate: 22.8±3.31,18-30 ND,Periodofanalysis:ND clearly,Spectralanalysis Controls: technique:NA 18(12F) 22.0±2.64,18-30 Peteretal.[47] Insomniacs: DSM-IVandPSQI(cid:21)5 PSQIrange:10-17and ND Monitoringtime:during 21(18F) sleepcharacteristics daytime,ECGandBP 48.2±10.4,18-75 availableforrevision samplingrate:200,Periodof analysis:5-7min,Spectral Controls: analysistechnique:FFT 21(18F) 48.5±11.1,18-75 Nelsonetal. Insomniacs: DSM-IVandPSQI(cid:21)5 PSQI:9.5±3.0,BDI: ND Monitoringtime:during [86] 34(18F) 10.3±6.0.Available sleep,ECGsamplingrate: 21.1±4.9,18-45 characteristicsforrevision ND,Periodofanalysis:ND, Spectralanalysistechnique: Controls: NA 38(26F) 20.5±2.2,18-45 deZambotti Insomniacs: DSM-IVforprimaryinsomniaand PSQI:9.6±1.3,AIS: 90.0(±4)%—95.0 Monitoringtime:duringsleep etal.[12] 8(4F) PSQI:(cid:21)6,AIS(cid:21)6,ISI:(cid:21)11 9.6±3.2,ISI:13.4±3.3 (±2)% onset,ECGsamplingrate: 23.3±2.4,20-26 Availablecharacteristicsfor 500Hz,Periodofanalysis: revision 2.5min,Spectralanalysis Controls: technique:FFT 8(5F) 23.3±3.2,19-28 Tsaietal.[87] Insomniacs: Subjectivelyreporteddifficultyof PSQI:11.3±2.2,SOL: 90.1(±8.7)%— Monitoringtime:duringsleep 19(13F) fallingasleep(cid:21)20-30minfor(cid:21)3 25.9±40.9.Availablesleep 94.8(±2.8)% onset,ECGsamplingrate: 22.9±1.6,20-25 daysperweekover6monthsand characteristicsforrevision 500Hz,Periodofanalysis: daytimeconsequencesandPSQI: NA,Spectralanalysis Controls: >5.Definedas technique:NA 14(5F) psychophysiologicalinsomnia 22.4±1.1,20-25 basedontheobjectivefinding Maesetal.[71] Insomniacs: DSM-IV-TRandsubjective SOL:33.8±17.1,Mean 79.1(±10.1)%— Monitoringtime:duringsleep 17F SOL>30min,atleast5nightsper durationofinsomnia 89.0(±6.8)% onsetandfirstNREMcycle, 36.2±9.6,19-53 week 10.8±10.9years.Available ECGsamplingrate:1000 sleepcharacteristicsfor Hz,Periodofanalysis:5min, Controls: revision Spectralanalysistechnique: 11F FFT 37.6±12.6,21-59 Rothenberger Insomniacs: Self-reportInsomniaSymptom ND ND Monitoringtime:during etal.[72] 19F Questionnaire(Incorporatedto sleep,ECGsamplingrate: 52.1±2.2,ND defineDSM-IVcriteriaforinsomnia 1024Hz,Periodofanalysis: andResearchDiagnosticCriteria) 2min,Spectralanalysis Controls: technique:FFT 146F 52.1±2.2,ND (Continued) PLOSONE|https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186716 October23,2017 10/31
Description: