ebook img

Measurement of B_s Oscillations and CP Violation Results from D0 PDF

0.96 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Measurement of B_s Oscillations and CP Violation Results from D0

Measurement of B Oscillations and CP Violation s 9 Results from DØ 0 0 J. Ellison, for the DØ Collaboration 2 University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA n a J 0 2 Abstract ] We present a measurement of the B0 −B¯0 oscillation frequency, ∆m , using a combination x s s s of semi-leptonic and hadronic B decay candidates selected from data collected by the DØ e s ExperimentattheFermilabTevatron.WealsopresentseveralresultsonCPviolation,including - p an improved measurement of the B CP-violating phase from a flavor-tagged analysis of B0 → s s e J/ψ+φ decays. h [ 2 Key words: v PACS: 5 3 1 1. Introduction 2 . 1 Among the primary goals of the Tevatron is the observation of B oscillations and the s 0 searchforCPviolationinB-mesondecays.Inthispaperwedescribesomerecentresults 9 in these areas. The data used for the results described here are based on approximately 0 : 1.2−2.8 fb−1 of data collected by the DØ Experiment at the Fermilab Tevatron. The v DØ detector consists of a central tracking system surrounded by a uranium liquid-argon i X calorimeter and an outer muon detection system and is described in [1]. r a 2. Measurement of B Oscillations s InthispaperwereportapreliminarymeasurementoftheB0−B¯0 oscillationfrequency s s ∆m based on the analysis of five decay channels: (1) B0 → D−µ+νX,D− → φπ−; s s s s (2) B0 → D−e + νX,D− → φπ−; (3) B0 → D−µ+νX,D− → K∗0K−; (4) B0 → s s s s s s s D−µ+νX,D− →K0K−;(5)B0 →D−π+,D →φπ−.Thedatasetswereapproximatley s s s s s s 2.4 fb−1 for all channels except (4) whihc used a dataset of 1.2 fb−1. DØ has previously reporteddirectlimitsonB oscillationsusing1fb−1 ofdatainthefirstdecaychannel[2]. s PreprintsubmittedtoElsevier January21,2009 After selection and reconstruction of the B0 decays, the flavor of the B0 at decay is s s determined from the charge of the muon, electron, or pion in the final state. The flavor at production is determined using a combined flavor tagger based on opposite-side and same-side tagging [3]. The effectiveness of the tagging algorithm is characterized by the tagging efficiency (cid:15) and the dilution D defined by D = (N −N )/(N +N ), RS WR RS WR where N and N are the number of right-sign and wrong-sign tags, respectively. RS WR The overall effectiveness of the combined tagger, obtained using B → µνD∗− data and B →J/ψφ data and Monte Carlo, is (cid:15)D2 =4.49±0.88%. s The determination of the proper decay length takes into account possible missing momentum, e.g. due to the presence of a neutrino in the semileptonic decay modes. The properdecaylengthisgivenbycτ =xMK,wherexM isthemeasuredorvisibleproper B0 s decay length, given by (cid:34)d(cid:126)Bs0 ·p(cid:126) (cid:96)Ds−(cid:35) pµDs− xM = T T cM with K = T (p(cid:96)Ds−)2 Bs0 pBs0 T T The K-factor, K, is determined from Monte Carlo. Themeasurementof∆m isaccomplishedusinganunbinnedlikelihhodfittothedata. s The likelihood function is constructed using the probabilities for mixed and unmixed decays, (cid:18) (cid:19) 1 K Kx P (t)= exp − (1−Dcos∆m Kx/c) mix 2cτ cτ s Bs Bs (cid:18) (cid:19) 1 K Kx P (t)= exp − (1+Dcos∆m Kx/c) nomix 2cτ cτ s Bs Bs and accounting for detector resolutions and background contributions. The combined amplitude scan, where the likelihood is modified to include an amplitude term, L ∝ 1±ADcos(∆m Kx/c), is shown in Fig. 1(a). The likelihood as a function of ∆m is s s shown in Fig. 1(b). The measured value of ∆m is obtained from a fit to the likelihood s vs. ∆m in the region of the minimum shown in Fig. 1(b), and yields ∆m = 18.53± s s 0.93(stat.)±0.30(syst.) ps−1. The significance of this result is 2.9 σ. The∆m measurementcanbetranslatedintoaconstrainton|V /V |,andweobtain s td ts (cid:12) (cid:12) (cid:12)(cid:12)Vtd(cid:12)(cid:12)=0.2018±0.005(exp.)+0.0081(theor.) (cid:12)V (cid:12) −0.0060 ts 3. Analysis of B0 → J/ψ+K∗0 and B0 → J/ψ+φ Decays d s Before discussing CP Violation in B0 →J/ψ+φ, we present results of an analysis of s B0 →J/ψ+K∗0 andB0 →J/ψ+φdecays,inwhichCPviolationisneglected.Theaim d s istomeasuretheparameterswhichdescribethetime-dependentangulardistributionsof thesedecayswheretheinitialB mesonflavorisnotdetermined.Therelevantparameters are the linear polarization amplitudes, the strong phases, and the lifetimes. This allows ustoobtainthelifetimeratio,andtestSU(3)flavorsymmetryandfactorization.Thisis achievedbyfittingtothemass,lifetime,andangulardistributionsofthedecayproducts. For details of the analysis see [4]. 2 Fig.1.(a)Bs0 oscillationamplitudeasafunctionof∆ms and(b)Bs0 oscillationlikelihoodasafunction of∆ms. The preliminary results are shown in Table 1. The B results are competitive and d consistentwithpreviousmeasurementsbyCDF,BaBar,andBelle.Themeasurementsof the strong phases indicate the presence of final-state interactions for B0 → J/ψ+K∗0, d since δ is 3.5 σ away from zero. Also, comparison of the polarization amplitudes and 1 strong phases shows no evidence for violation of SU(3) flavor symmetry. Table1 Preliminaryresultsforthelinearpolarizationamplitudes,strongphases,lifetimeandwidthdifference forBd0→J/ψ+K∗0 andBs0→J/ψ+φ.A0 andA(cid:107) arethelinearpolarizationamplitudes,δ1,δ2,and δ(cid:107) are the strong phases, τ is the lifetime, and for the Bs decay, ∆Γs is the width difference between thelightandheavymasseigenstates. 4. Flavor-Tagged Analysis of B0 → J/ψ+φ Decays s The B0 → J/ψ φ decay involves a final state that is a mixture of CP-even and CP- s oddstates.InordertoseparatetheCP-evenandCP-oddstates,weperformamaximum likelihoodfittothemass,lifetime,andtime-dependentangulardistributionsoftheB0 → s J/ψ(→µ+µ−)φ(K+K−) decay. The fit yields the CP-violating phase φ and the width s difference∆Γ ≡Γ −Γ .Thedecaycanbedescribedbythreedecayanglesθ,φ,andψ s L H definedin[5].Weemployinitialstateflavortaggingwhichimprovesthesensitivitytothe 3 Fig.2.(a)Resultsofthefitsintheφs−∆Γs planefortheDØBs→J/ψφanalysisbasedon2.8fb−1 ofdata.(b)FitresultsfromthecombinationoftheDØresultswithCDFresultsbasedon1.35fb−1 of data. CP-violating phase and removes a sign ambiguity on φ for a given ∆Γ present in our s s previous analysis [6]. In the fit, ∆M is constrained to its measured value (from CDF) s and the strong phases are constrained to values measured for B at the B-factories, d allowing some degree of violation of SU(3) symmetry. The B flavor at production is s determined using a combined opposite-side plus sameside tagging algorithm. Confidence level contours in the φ −∆Γ plane are shown in Fig. 2(a). s s The fit yields a likelihood maximum at φ =−0.57+0.24 and ∆Γ =0.19±0.07 ps−1, s −0.30 s where the errors are statistical only. As a result of the constraints on the strong phases, the second maximum, at φ = 2.92+0.30, ∆Γ = −0.19±0.07 ps−1, is disfavored by a s −0.24 s likelihood ratio of 1:29. Fromthefitresultsandstudiesofthesystematicerrorsweobtainthewidthdifference ∆Γ ≡ Γ −Γ = 0.19±0.07(stat)+0.02(syst) ps−1 and the CP-violating phase, φ = s L H −0.01 s −0.57+0.24(stat)+0.07(syst). The allowed 90% C.L. intervals of ∆Γ and φ are 0.06 < −0.30 −0.02 s s ∆Γ <0.30 ps−1 and −1.20<φ <0.06, respectively. The probability to obtain a fitted s s value of φ lower than -0.57 given SM contributions only is 6.6%, which corresponds to s approximately 1.8 σ from the SM prediction. The results have been combined with CDF results by the Heavy Flavor Averaging Group. The CDF results are based on a data set of 1.35 fb−1 and the combination was performed with no constraints on the strong phases. The results are shown in Fig. 2(b). The fit yields two solutions as follows: φ =−2.37+0.38 rad, ∆Γ =−0.15+0.066 ps−1 s −0.27 s −0.059 φ =−0.75+0.27 rad, ∆Γ =0.15+0.059 ps−1 s −0.38 s −0.066 The p-value assuming only SM contributions is 3.1%, corresponding to 2.2 σ from the SM prediction. 4 5. Search for Direct CP Violation in B± → J/ψ K±(π±) Decays DØ has performed a search for direct CP violation by measurement of the charge asymmetry in B± →J/ψ K±(π±) decays [7]. The charge asymmetry is defined by N(B− →J/ψ K−(π−))−N(B+ →J/ψ K+(π+)) A (B+ →J/ψ K+(π+))= CP N(B− →J/ψ K−(π−))+N(B+ →J/ψ K+(π+)) Direct CP violation in these decays leads to a non-zero charge asymmetry. In the SM there is a small level of CP violation: A (B+ →J/ψ K+)≈0.003 [8] and A (B+ → CP CP J/ψ π+)≈0.01 [9]. New physics may significantly enhance A . CP After selection of B± → J/ψ K±(π±) candidates, the invariant mass of the J/ψK is constructed and fit to the sum of contributions from B± → J/ψ K±, B± → J/ψ π±, B± →J/ψ K∗,andcombinatorialbackground.Fromthefitwefindapproximately40,000 B± → J/ψ K± candidates and about 1,600 B± → J/ψ π± candidates. To extract the charge asymmetry the sample is divided into 8 subsamples according to the solenoid polarity, the sign of the pseudorapidity of the J/ψK system, and the charge of the K candidate. A χ2 fit to the number of events in each subsample yields the integrated raw chargeasymmetry.Thisisthencorrectedfortheasymmetryofthekaoninteractionrate on nucleons to obtain the final results: A (B+ →J/ψ K+)=+0.0075±0.0061(stat.)±0.0027(syst.) CP A (B+ →J/ψ π+)=−0.09±0.08(stat.)±0.03(syst.) CP Theresultsareconsistentwiththeworldaverageresults[10].TheprecisionforA (B+ → CP J/ψ π+) is comparable with the current world average, while for A (B+ → J/ψ K+) CP the precision is a significant (factor of 2.5) improvement over the current world average. 6. Search for Direct CP Violation in Semileptonic B Decays s InthissectionwereportanewsearchforCPviolationinthedecayB0 →D−µ+νX, (D− → s s s φπ−, φ → K+K−) by measurement of the charge asymmetry using a time-dependent analysis with flavor tagging. The technique used is similar to that used in the DØ B s oscillation analysis (see Section 2). A fit to the invariant KKπ mass of the selected data is shown in Fig. 3. The sample is divided into 8 subsamples according to solenoid polarity, the sign of the pseudorapidity of the D µ system, and the muon charge. An unbinned likelihood s fit is used to extract the asymmetry. The systematic uncertainties are mainly due to uncertaintiesinthecc¯contribution,uncertaintiesintheefficiencyvsvisibleproperdecay length, and uncertainties in the B →D(∗)µν branching fractions. Accounting for these s s yields the final result: as =−0.0024±0.0117(stat.)+0.0015(syst.) sl −0.0024 This result is consistent with the SM prediction and is the most precise measurement to date. 5 Fig.3.TheKKπ invariantmassdistributionshowingtheµ+D− andµ+D− signalstogetherwiththe s fitresults. 7. Measurement of Br(B0 → D(∗)D(∗)) s s s FortheB0 system,thewidthdifferencebetween∆Γ ≡Γ −Γ isrelatedtothewidth s s L H difference between the CP eigenstates, ∆ΓCP ≡ Γeven −Γodd, by ∆Γ = ∆ΓCP cosφ . s s s s s s The quantity ∆ΓCP can be estimated from the branching fraction Br(B0 →D(∗)D(∗)). s s s s DØhasperformedapreliminarymeasurementofBr(B0 →D(∗)D(∗))basedon2.8fb−1 s s s ofdatausingeventswhichcontaindecaysD+ →φπ+ andD− →φµ−ν (andtheircharge s s conjugates).Thesignalisextractedfroma2-dimensionallikelihoodfittothedatainthe m(D φπ)−m(φµ) plane. The results are [12]: s Br(B0 →D(∗)D(∗))=0.035±0.010(stat.)±0.011(syst.) s s s ∆ΓCP s =0.072±0.021(stat.)±0.022(syst.) Γ s Assuming CP violation in the SM is small, the results are in good agreement with the SM prediction. References [1] V.M. Abazov et al., (The DØ Collaboration), “The Upgraded D0 Detector,” Nucl. Instr. and MethodsA565,463(2006). [2] V.M.Abazovetal.,(TheDØCollaboration),Phys.Rev.Lett.97,021802(2006). [3] V. M. Abazov et al., (The DØ Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 74, 112002 (2006); V. M. Abazov et al.,(TheDØCollaboration),DØConferenceNote5210. [4] V.M.Abazovetal.,(TheDØCollaboration),arXiv:0810.0037,submittedtoPhys.Rev.Lett. [5] V.M.Abazovetal.,(TheDØCollaboration),arXiv:0802.2255,submittedtoPhys,Rev.Lett. [6] V.M.Abazovetal.,(TheDØCollaboration),Phys.Rev.Lett.98,121801(2007). [7] V.M.Abazovetal.,(TheDØCollaboration),Phys.Rev.Lett.100,211802(2008). [8] W.-S.Hou,M.Nagashima,A.Soddu,arXiv:hep-ph/0605080. [9] I.Dunietz,Phys.Lett.BB316,561(1993);W.-S.Hou,arXiv:hep-ph/9905541(1999). [10]C.Amsleretal.,PhysicsLettersB667,1(2008). [11]V.M.Abazovetal.,(TheDØCollaboration),Phys.Rev.Lett.97,021802,(2006). [12]V.M.Abazovetal.,(TheDØCollaboration),arXiv:0811.2173,submittedtoPhys.Rev.Lett. 6

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.