MEASURED TONES The interplay of physics and music Second edition Ian Johnston Institute of Physics Publishing Bristol and Philadelphia Copyright © 2002 IOP Publishing Ltd. (cid:1)c IOPPublishingLtd2002 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recordingorotherwise, withoutthepriorpermission of the publisher. Multiple copying is permitted in accordance with the terms of licencesissuedbytheCopyrightLicensingAgencyunderthetermsofitsagreement withUniversitiesUK(UUK). BritishLibraryCataloguing-in-PublicationData AcataloguerecordforthisbookisavailablefromtheBritishLibrary. ISBN0750307625 LibraryofCongressCataloging-in-PublicationDataareavailable Firstpublished1989 Reprintedwithcorrections1993 Reprinted1994,1997,2001 Secondedition2002 Reprintedwithcorrections2003 CommissioningEditor: JamesRevill ProductionEditor: SimonLaurenson ProductionControl: SarahPlenty CoverDesign: Fre´de´riqueSwist MarketingExecutive: LauraSerratrice Published by Institute of Physics Publishing, wholly owned by The Institute of Physics,London InstituteofPhysicsPublishing,DiracHouse,TempleBack,BristolBS16BE,UK USOffice: InstituteofPhysicsPublishing,ThePublicLedgerBuilding,Suite929, 150SouthIndependenceMallWest,Philadelphia,PA19106,USA FirstprintedintheUKbyAntonyRoweLtd,Chippenham,Wiltshire ReprintedintheUKbyMPGBooksLtd,Bodmin,Cornwall Copyright © 2002 IOP Publishing Ltd. Acknowledgments Theproductionofabookofthischaracterwouldbeimpossiblewithouta largenumberofillustrations,particularlyofmusicalinstruments. Wehave tried to obtain permission for all illustrations which are still in copyright, butthereareoneortwowherewehavebeenunsuccessful. Mythanksare duetothefollowingorganizationsandindividualswhogavetheirpermis- siontousematerial: H.Bagot,p.276l;BostonSymphonyOrchestra,p.178;CordonArt,Baarn, Holland(forM.C.Escherheirs)p.111u,p.112u;DiagramVisualInforma- tion Ltd, p.224u, p.270u, p.303u; Dover Publications Inc, p.57u, p.59ul, p.60ul, p.118ul, p.137, p.167; and (from Music, A Pictorial Archive of WoodcutsandEngravingsbyJimHarter1980)p.41,p.43ul,p.54u,p.118m, p.120u, p.123l, p.125u, p.211l, p.213, p.224l, p.226l, p.227ul, p.230ul, p.231, p.232, p.269ul, p.273, p.274; Harper and Row Inc (from Harper’s Dictionary of Music by Christine Ammer, drawings by C.M. Ciampa and K.L. Donlon, 1972) p.87l, p.89u, p.218l, p.270l, p.271m, p.272u, p.275u; S. Levarie, p.2, p.275l; Lord Rennell of Rodd, p.338; Macmillan Pub- lishers Ltd (fromThe New Grove Dictionary Of Music and Musiciansed. Stanley Sadie, 1980) p.303l; McGraw-Hill Publishing Co. (from R.D. Chellis,PileFoundations,1961),p.63;OxfordUniversityPress(fromThe New Oxford Companion to Music, ed Denis Arnold, 1983) p.128, p.307; The Ann Ronan Picture Library, p.21, p.22, p.24, p.27, p.72, p.93, p.154, p.185,p.236,p.237;W.J.Strong,p.276u,p.277l;UnwinHymanLtd(from C.A. Ronan The Astronomers, 1964) p.11, p.23; John Wiley and Sons (from J.W. Kane and M.M. Sternheim, Life Science Physics 1978) p.241; MichaelNicholson/CORBIS,p.107;Bettmann/CORBIS,p.107. Copyright © 2002 IOP Publishing Ltd. Contents List of tables x Prologue xii 1. Why these and not others? 1 Lengthofstrings.Harmoniousintervals.Pythagoras.Pentatonic andPythagoreanscales. Ptolemy. Boethius. 2. Music and scientific method 17 Medieval music. Josquin. Copernicus. Kepler. Galileo. Vi- brations. Pendulumsandstrings. Consonance. Measurementof frequency. Standardsofpitch. Interlude 1. Brass instruments 37 3. The harmonies of a mechanical universe 56 Mechanical forces. Energy. Oscillation theory. Mersenne’s Laws. Baroquemusic. Instruments. Equaltemperament. Interlude 2. The piano 74 4. Overtones of enlightenment 86 Newton and the Age of Reason. Visualization of oscillations. Overtones. Harmonicanalysisandsynthesis. Rameauandhar- mony. EndoftheEnlightenment. Interlude 3. The violin 109 Copyright © 2002 IOP Publishing Ltd. 5. Over the waves 131 Wave theory. Speed of sound. Wave properties: reflection, ab- sorption,diffraction. HuygensandYoung. Standingwaves. Interlude 4. Acoustics in architecture 152 6. The romance of electricity 171 TheRomanticmovement. Studyofelectricity,Faraday. Acous- tics. Energy coupling and acoustic impedance. Mismatch the- orem. Standingwavesinaircolumns. Interlude 5. Woodwind instruments 195 7. Summertime in Heidelberg 221 Wagner and Helmholtz. Theory of resonance. Working of the ear. Pitch recognition and discrimination. Psycho-acoustics. Theoryofconsonance. Interlude 6. Percussion instruments 247 8. O brave new world 265 Communication devices: microphones, gramophones, valves, transistors. Effect on music. Modern sound engineering: fre- quencyresponse,transients. Technology. Interlude 7. Electronic instruments 287 9. I think, therefore I am 304 Theoryofcommunication. Information. Computers. Computer composition. Interlude 8. Sublimest of instruments, the voice 319 Epilogue 339 Copyright © 2002 IOP Publishing Ltd. Appendix 1. Musical notation 341 Appendix 2. Logarithms 346 Appendix 3. Measurement of pitch intervals 350 Appendix 4. Measurement of loudness 353 Appendix 5. Acoustic impedance 357 Appendix 6. Pentatonic scales 363 Bibliography 369 Accompanying web site 375 Copyright © 2002 IOP Publishing Ltd. List of Tables Just scale frequencies 36 Vibration frequencies, cylinders and cones 43 The harmonic series 46 Equal tempered and just scales 72 Physical properties of strings 75 Fourier harmonics 98 Representative wavelengths in air 141 Standing waves on a string 151 Absorption coefficients of materials 160 Standing waves, closed pipe 186 Standing waves, open pipe 186 Vibration frequencies, closed/open pipes 187 Loudness levels 238 Vibration frequencies of a membrane 253 Vibration frequencies of a metal bar 259 Copyright © 2002 IOP Publishing Ltd. Representative formant frequencies 332 Musical notation, duration 342 Musical notation, pitch 345 Powers of ten 346 Logarithms (integer) 347 Logarithms (fractional) 348 Pythagorean tuning 352 Just tuning 352 Equal tempered tuning 352 Acoustic power, representative instruments 353 Intensity, representative instruments 354 Loudness, decibel scale 355 Representative impedance mismatches 359 Copyright © 2002 IOP Publishing Ltd. Prologue The purpose of this book is easy to explain. I am a physicist and not a musician. Yet I am interested in music and am aware of just how much thetwofieldshavetooffertooneanother. Iwouldliketomakethismore widely known. I believe that your enjoyment of music can be increased therebyandsocanyourunderstandingofphysics. Whateveryourinterest, alittlebitofextraknowledgecanonlyhelp. Itisassimpleasthat. Thereareofcoursemanybooksonthissubject. Theyareusuallywrit- tenbyphysicists(Ihaveneverseenonewrittenbyamusiciantellingscien- tistswhattheyshouldknowaboutmusic). Mostofthemhavewhatseems tomeagravefault: theypresupposeacertainframeofmindintheirread- ers. Theirearlychaptersaredevotedtosimplephysics—vibrations,waves, Fourier analysis, etc. The second half deals with musical instruments, ar- chitectural acoustics, scales, electrical recording and reproduction. It is a classicalscientificapproach—theoryfirstandapplicationslater. Thetroubleisthatthisapproachreallyonlysuitsscientificallyminded readers. MostmusicalpeoplethatIknow,findthephysicalconceptsquite obscure,andhavegreatdifficultyrecallingthemforlaterapplications. So Iwanttotryadifferentapproach,todevelopthephysicalconceptsandthe musical applications together. This approach will make for rather an un- usualordering. Forexample, itispossibletounderstandalotaboutbrass instruments with relatively little physical knowledge, so I will talk about them quite early. But woodwinds are much more complicated theoreti- cally,andmustwaittilltowardstheend. Theveryfirsttopicwillbemusi- calscalesandconsonance,whichisanextremelysubtlemusicalquestion, butcanbediscussedwithonlyafewverysimplescientificobservations. So my plan has been firstly to explain the physics that is involved in music, trying all the time to simplify the details as much as possible. To thisendIhavescrupulouslyavoidedalgebraicmathematicalequations,in the belief that they tend to frighten non-scientists. It seems to me that if they are written out in words, they look more user-friendly. Secondly, I have tried at each stage to make it clear where the physics is important in a musical context. However I am not a expert on music or musicology— although I think that everything I have to say is perfectly well known and accepted, and can be checked in one of the standard musical encyclope- dias. So please keep in mind that, when I talk about musical matters, I Copyright © 2002 IOP Publishing Ltd. amtryingtosaythatthephysicalconceptshaveapplicationhere, without beingdefinitive. One word of warning. I have arranged the material historically, be- causethatseemsanaturalandlogicalorderingfortheapproachIwantto take. Physicalideashavetobeunderstoodinsequence,theeasyonesfirst and later ones building on the earlier. And by and large, that is how they developed. So this book will, in parts, read like a history of the subject. Butitisimportant,Ithink,tomakeitclearthatthisdoesnotclaimtobea serioushistoricalwork. Scientists, when trying to explain science, have always used an ‘his- torical’ approach—thumbnail sketches of great figures, the dates and cir- cumstances of various discoveries, and so on. A lot of what they say is probably apocryphal. Did Archimedes really jump out his bath shouting “Eureka!”? DidRo¨ntgenreallydiscoverX-raysbyleavingalumpofpitch- blendeonsomeunexposedfilm? Inaway,literalhistoricalaccuracyisnot important. The message usually is: “This is a simple and easy to observe fact, but it is not trivial. There was certainly a time when people did not knowitordidnotrealizeitssignificance”. Itmaybethatmyapproachinthisbookshouldbeputintothis‘apoc- ryphal history of science’ category. To give you one example, many his- torians and philosophers of science (though not working scientists) seem to dislike the idea that science ‘progresses’. The story, as I tell it, very definitely progresses from the time of Pythagoras to the present day. I havechosenpeopleandideastotalkaboutinordertobuildupacomplete picture,eachconceptrestingonthefoundationofthepreviousones. Ide- liberately chose not to talk about the dead ends, the ideas that didn’t lead anywhere,regardlessofwhetherornotthispresentsanaccuratepictureof howscienceisactuallydone. NeverthelessIhavetriedtobeasaccurateas Icaninmyuseofhistoricalinformation,andIhavebeencarefultoinclude areferencebibliographyfromwhichyoucancheckonwhatIhavesaidor canfollowitfurtherifyouwish. But most importantly, I have never attempted to explain a physical idea in any but modern terms. To present a correct explanation of some effectbytalkingaboutanincorrectexplanationfirst,usuallyjustincreases confusion in the reader’s mind, no matter how valid that approach might be in historical terms. In the end, the history is there as a context for the physicsandthemusic. ItisalsotherebecauseIfinditinteresting. Ihope youdotoo. Lastly, my treatment of musical instruments, for reasons that I have hintedatearlier, willnotfitintothissimplehistoricalordering. SoIhave called the chapters dealing with them interludes, and you can skip over them if you are looking for a connected story. Within these interludes I have talked about the historical development of each class of instrument becauseitisusuallyeasiertoappreciatethephysicsinthesimplerinstru- Copyright © 2002 IOP Publishing Ltd.