ebook img

Mating experience affecting male discrimination between sexes and female morphs in Ischnura senegalensis (Rambur) (Zygoptera: Coenagrionidae) PDF

2010·1.5 MB·English
by  TakahashiY
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Mating experience affecting male discrimination between sexes and female morphs in Ischnura senegalensis (Rambur) (Zygoptera: Coenagrionidae)

Odonatologica39(I):47-56 March I,2010 Matingexperienceaffecting malediscrimination betweensexes andfemalemorphs in Ischnura senegalensis(Rambur) (Zygoptera: Coenagrionidae) Y.Takahashi and M.Watanabe* GraduateSchool ofLife andEnvironmental Sciences,UniversityofTsukuba,Tsukuba, Ibaraki,305-8572,Japan [email protected] Received October16,2009/ReviewedandAcceptedNovember 25,2009 Ischnura senegalensis9 9 exhibit colourdimorphism,appearingasandromorphs and gynomorphs.Binarychoice experimentsbetween sexesand morphswerecon- ductedinthelaboratory.Virgind3 rearedseparatelyfrom9 9showednopreference between sexesorbetweenmorphs,suggestingthatvirgin 33wereunable torecog- nizepotentialmatesandhad noinnatematingpreferenceforaparticular 9morph. Afterenclosurewith asingle9in asmallcage,33thathad experiencedcopulation significantly preferredthesame 9morphwith whichtheyhadcopulated,while 33 that failedtocopulatewiththe 2showednopreference.The66 thathadexperienced copulationsignificantlypreferred $ 2over33.Therefore,abilityofdStodiscrimi- natebetween sexesand morphswasconfirmed bytheircopulationexperience. INTRODUCTION Differencesin reproductive interestsbetween sexes can lead to sexual conflict overmating frequency(PARKER, 1979),potentiallycausing asexually antago- nistic co-evolution(HOLLAND & RICE, 1998). GAVR1LETS& WAXMAN (2002) suggested thatone ofthe outcomes insexually antagonistic coevolution is femaledivergence withina population, e.g. femalepolymorphism. Inzygop- terans, femalecolourpolymorphism involvesanandromorph, resembling con- specific males,andgynomorphs, exhibiting differentcolourationfromthemales (e.g. ROBERTSON, 1985). ■"Correspondingauthor:[email protected] 48 Y.Takahashi &M.Watanabe Becausefrequencyoffemalemorphs inapopulation variesspatiallyandtem- porally (BERGSTEN etal., 2001; CORDERO RIVERA & EGIDOPEREZ, 1998;CORDERO RIVERA&sAnCHEZ-GUILLEN,2007), formingasearch- -image of the common femalemorph maybe advantageous formales if it in- creases their searching efficiency (FINCKE, 1994). Males have to adjust their mating preference tothechange inthemorphfrequency. Infemale-polymorphic species, frequency-dependence inmalemating preference forfemalemorphs has beenreported inIschnuraelegans(Vander Linden) (VANGOSSUM etal., 1999) and in I. senegalensis (Rambur) (TAKAHASHI & WATANABE, 2009). Such preferentialmatingattemptswithcommonfemalemorphsmightleadtonegative frequency-dependent selection, which is apotential driving forceformaintain- ing themultiplefemalemorphs withinapopulation (SVENSSON & ABBOTT, 2005). Malesencounter variousinsects intheirhabitatthroughout theirlifespan, in- cluding potential mates as well as unsuitableindividuals such as sexually im- mature females, conspecific males or heterospecific individuals. Sinceattempts to mate withunsuitableindividualsare costly interms of timewasted(STOKS & DE BRUYN, 1998),males have to distinguish between potential matesand unsuitableindividualsas wellas betweenmorphs inorderto increase theirmat- ing success. In /. elegans males preferentially attempted to mate with sexually , mature femalesratherthanwithsexually immaturefemales(VAN GOSSUM et al.,2001a) orconspecific males(VANGOSSUM etal., 2005). In Enallagma civile (Elagen), a previous experience by males of encounter- ing aparticular femalemorph increasedtheirmatingpreference forthatmorph (MILLER& FINCKE, 1999).VAN GOSSUM etal.(2001b) showedthatI. el- egansmales reversibly change theirmating preference basedon theexperience. Although MILLER& FINCKE(2004)suggested thatan encounter experience elicitedachange inthemales’matingpreferences, the matingpreferences might beaffected by the type of interactions withthe individualsencountered.Inthe presentstudy, weexaminedtheinnatemalematingpreference forfemalemorphs andsexes,andclarifiedtheeffects of matingexperience on matingpreferences. METHODS STUDYSPECIES— Ischnurasenegalensis(Rambur)femalesexhibit colourdimorphism,witha conspicuousblueandromorphandabrown gynomorph,thoughmales aremonomorphicwithgreen thoraciccolour. Femalemorphswerecontrolled by asingleautosomallocushavingtwoalleles,with expressionlimitedtofemales(Y.Takahashi&M.Watanabe,unpubl.data),asinthecaseofI.demorsa (Hagen)(JOHNSON,1964)andI.damulaCalvert (JOHNSON, 1966).Bothsexesstayatthewater’s edgealldaylong.Copulationsstart in earlymorningand terminate aroundnoon(TAKAHASHI &WATANABE,2009).Femalesoviposit aloneduringtheafternoon withoutcopulation,although malesmakemanyattemptstomatewiththem. PREPARATIONOFTESTSPECIMENS — Inordertoobtaintestspecimens,artificialovipo- sitionby femalescollected fromthefieldwas conductedinthelaboratory.Sexuallymaturefemales MatingexperienceinmaleIschnura senegalensis 49 wereputindividuallyintopetri dishes(ip90mm)forseveraldayswithawetfilter paperasanovipo- sitionsubstrate. Eggslaidonthe filterpaper werekeptinapetri dishfilled withwateratroom tem- perature, and mosthatched 10-11days afteroviposition.Thefirstinstarlarvaeweremovedtolarge plastic containers (8x12 cm,height 5 cm)with asubmergedpolypropylenemesh (5x5 cm,weave size Imm)astheirperchingsites.Theywerefedonlive brineshrimps(Altemiasp.).Whentheyhad grown toapproximately3mm inbody length,theywereplacedindividuallyinplastic bottles(ip3.5 cm, height5.8 cm)in orderto avoid cannibalism. Medium-sized larvae(>5mm)werefedforthree months onlive Tubifexspp. astheir main fooduntil emergence. Atwig about 10cm inlengthwas providedineach bottleasasupportfortheemergence ofthefinal instarlarva. Anindividual identification codewasmarkedontherighthindwingofeachadultwith afinefelt- -tippedpen afterthewingshadhardened. Thesexeswereseparatedinrespectiveflyingcages(40x40x50 cm)with wooden framescovered by polypropylenemesh (weavesize 1 mm).Less thanten adults werereared ineachcage,inordertodecrease therisk ofcannibalism. Theadultswerefedonfruit flies,Drosophilaspp.,whichhad beencultured. Toincrease thehumidityaswell astosupplywater, wemistedinside ofthecage withwater2-3 timesperday. PROCEDUREOFBINARY CHOICE EXPERIMENT - Fivetonine days old sexuallyma- tureadults ofbothsexeswereused asthetest specimensinthebinarychoiceexperiment.Theywere alreadysexuallymature,judgingfromthebody colour and thewingtransparency. Since themale’s matechoicebehaviour mightbe affectedbymaterefusal behaviour aswell asbyunknown female matechoicebehaviour,itwasnecessarytouseimmobile specimensin thebinarychoiceexperiment. Sexuallymature virgin adultsreared inflyingcages werekilled bybeingplacedinafreezer fortwo minutes. Afterthat,theirabdomenswerestraightened,and theirwingswerekeptclosed. Beforethe experiment,two specimenswerepinnedwith amicro-needle (<p0.18mm)ontheupper frameinthe experimentalcage(30x30x30cm wooden framescoveredbypolypropylenemesh,weavesize 1mm) intheperchingposture.Toevaluatethemale’s responseto eachcolourmorph,bothtypesofspeci- menwerepinnednexttoeach other 3cmapart.Thesiteofeachspecimenwaschangedineverytrial. Sincethebodycolouration ofthefreshlykilledspecimensdeterioratedby theevening,newspecimens werepreparedforeachexperimental day. Toinvestigateinnatematingpreferenceformorphsandsexes,abinarychoiceexperimentwascon- ductedusingavirginmalethatwasrearedseparatelyfromfemales afteremergence. Inthemorning (07:00-09:00),themalewasintroduced intoanexperimentalcageinwhichapairconsistingofanan- dromorphand gynomorph,anandromorphandmale,oragynomorphand malewaspinned.Each binarychoiceexperimentwasstoppedwhenthe male‘attacked’ onespecimen,i.e.,when it dashed toafemaleand tried toformatandem withit.Themales’ ‘attacking’behaviour inthe direction of apinnedspecimenwasjudgedasanindicator ofthemale’spreference.Ifamale hadchosen neither specimenwithin fiveminutes,themalewasdiscardedfrom theexperiment. To determinetheeffectofthecopulationexperienceofthemale onmatingpreferenceformorphs or sexes,asinglevirginmale wasintroduced into theexperimentalcage with asingle sexuallyma- turefemale,eitheranandromorphoragynomorph,inthemorning.Themale’smatingattemptsand copulationbehaviour inthecagewereobserved duringtheenclosure periodforabout4hours.Just afterremoval ofthecoexistingfemaleatnoon,thebinarychoiceexperimentbetween andromorph and gynomorph,andromorphandmale,orgynomorphandmale wasconductedforthemales. STATISTICALTEST— Outcomes ofbinarychoiceexperimentswereanalyzedbyperforming binominal tests. Differences and changesin preferenceofmales wereanalyzed bythe Chi-square tests. The programused wasthe Rversion2.7.0(R DevelopmentCoreTeam,2008). 50 Y.Takahashi&M.Watanabe RESULTS MATING PREFERENCEOFVIRGINMALES Ineachbinary choiceexperiment, most males ‘attacked’the killed specimen presented as soonas they wereintroducedintotheexperimental cage.Themales grasped and tried to form atandemwith the specimen. Some males hovered aroundthe specimens justbeforethey ‘attacked’them. Suchbehavioursuggest- edthatthemalesrecognized thepaired specimens simultaneously andthatthey wereableto choosefreely oneofthespecimens inthisexperiment. Inthebinary choiceexperiment betweenandromorph andgynomorph, every virginmaleimmediately attackedto matewiththefemalespecimen. Virgin males thatwereoffspringoftheandromorphs exhibitednopreferenceforfemalemorphs (binomial test,P=0.215) (Tab. I). Alsono preference was foundinvirginmales thatwere offspring of gynomorphs (binomial test,P=1.0); nordidtheoffspring ofunknownfemalemorphs (binomial test, P=1.0). Theselectivity was not sig- nificantlydifferentbetweenmalesderivedfromandromorphs andthosederived fromgynomorphs (x2=0.739, P=0.390), indicatingthatvirginmales didnot dis- tinguish betweenmorphs irrespective oftheirmaternalmorph. AsshowninTableII,virginmalesexhibitednopreferencebetweenmaleandan- dromorph(binomialtest,P=0.860) andbetweenmaleandgynomorph(binomial test,P=0.122). Everymaleattempted to matewiththespecimens presented irre- spective of sex,and formedatandembyattaching theiranalappendages to the pronotumofthe specimen. Theseresults indicatedthatvirgin malescouldnot discriminatepotentialmates fromnonspecific males. DISCRIMINATIONBETWEENFEMALE MORPHS Whenvirginmaleswereenclosedwithasingle virgin or amatedfemaleinthe morning, they repeatedly tried to mate with it,and sometimes grasped it. Few matedfemalesaccepted the male mating attemptthroughout the enclosurepe- riod,showing amaterefusaldisplay, i.e.fluttering theirwings andbending their abdomens.On theotherhand,most virgin femalesaccepted themalesaftersev- TableI Binarychoiceexperimentbetween anandromorphand gynomorphfor virginmales (P-valuesrefertobinomial tests) Maternal morph No. males that No. malesthat P ofmalestested chose andromorph chosegynomorph Andromorph 12 20 0.215 Gynomorph 9 9 1.000 Unknown 37 36 1.000 MatingexperienceinmaleIschnurasenegalensis 51 Table II Binary choice experiment between anandromorph and gynomorphfor virginmale (P-valuesrefertobinomial tests) No.males that No. malesthat P chose male chosefemale Between male and andromorph 17 15 0.860 Betweenmale and gynomorph 18 9 0.122 eral mating attempts. Eachcopulation lasted for about threehours and termi- natedaroundnoon.Figure 1 showsthe outcomeoftheenclosurejustbeforethe binary choiceexperimentsbetween anandromorph andgynomorph. Outof22 malesthatwereenclosedwithanandromorph, ten malessucceededincopulat- ing,and 12males failedto copulate. Outof36malesthatwereenclosedwitha gynomorph, 24 malessucceeded incopulating, and 12malesfailedto copulate. Inthebinarychoiceexperiment intheafternoonfollowingtheenclosure, males ‘attacked’thedeadspecimen ofeach morphas soonas theywereintroducedinto the cage,except fourtestedmales, probably dueto handling damage orweari- ness. Malesthathadsucceededincopulating withanandromorph subsequently tendedto chooseandromorphs andthiswas significant(binomialtest,P=0.008) (Fig. 1). Similarly malesthatsucceeded incopulating witha gynomorph tended to choose gynomorphs, again significatnly (binomial test, P=0.007). Flowever, malesthathadfailedto copulatewithanandromorph oragynomorph intheen- closureperiod showednopreferencebetweenmorphs intheafternoon(binomial test,P=1.0andP=0.754, respectively). DISCRIMINATIONBETWEENSEXES Binary choiceexperimentsbetweenthesexesaftertheenclosureinthemorning wereconductedformalesthathadsucceededincopulating withvirgin females.In thebinarychoiceexperiment betweenafemaleandromorphandmale,malesthat hadcopulated withandromorphs significantly chosethe andromorph (binomial test,P=0.003) (Fig. 2).On theotherhand, inthe binary choiceexperiment be- tween afemalegynomorph andmale,althoughmalesthathadexperienced cop- ulationwitha gynomorph wereapt to prefer to matewithgynomorphs, nosig- nificantdifferencewas found(binomial test, P=0.308). Theproportion ofmales thatchosea gynomorph amongtheexperienced males(62.5%) was significantly higher than thatamong thevirgin males (33.3%) (x2=4.339, P=0.037), indicat- ing thatmaleswereableto improve theirprecision ofmaterecognition through theircopulation experience. 52 Y.Takahashi &M.Watanabe DISCUSSION JOHNSON (1975) suggested that males ofI. demorsaand I. damulahaving an andromorphic genotypeandmaleshaving a gynomorphic genotypeinnately had amating preference for andromorphs and forgynomorphs, respectively. If mating preference of males depends on theirown genotype,thepreference was partially affected by maternalgenotypes. Inthe present study, however, males showed no mating preference irrespective of maternalmorphs, suggesting that no virgin males haveinnate preference fora particularfemalemorph, as inthe caseofEnallagma spp. (FINCKE etal., 2007). Inaddition, no virginmales dis- Fig. 1,Male preferenceforfemalemorphsinthebinarychoice experimentsfollowingenclosurewith afemale. Numerals intheboxes indicatethenumberofmalesthatwereenclosedwith afemale and theresultsoftheirmatingattempt.Nrepresents the numberofmales thatchose thefemale morph in thebinarychoiceexperiments. P-values werecalculated usingbinomial tests. MatingexperienceinmaleIschnurasenegalensis 53 tinguished conspecific males from females, indicating thatvirgin malescannot recognize sexes andmorphs. FINCKE(1994)showedthatmaleslearnedtorecognize potentialmatesthrough theirpriorexperience. WhenI. elegans males hadbeenenclosedwitha particu- larfemalemorph,themaleschanged theirmatingpreference in accordancewith this previous enclosureexperience (VANGOSSUM etal., 2001b). MILLER& FINCKE (1999) suggested thatmalesswitchedtheirmating preference withthe frequency offemalemorphs encountered.Flowever, in I.senegalensis, exposure to aparticular femalemorph withoutcopulation didnotaffectsubsequent mat- ing behaviour, while malesthat experienced copulation preferred to mate with themorphwithwhichthey hadpreviouslymated.Therefore, ourresultsrevealed that copulation experience elicited achange in the matingpreference of I. sen- egalensis males, butencounters didnot. In thepresent study, somemales failed Fig.2.Malepreferenceforfemalemorphsinthebinarychoiceexperiments followingenclosurewith afemale that involved successfulmating.Numerals in theboxes indicatethenumber ofmales that hadmatedwith afemaleofeachmorph.Nrepresentsthenumber ofmales thatchosethespecimen presentedinthebinary choiceexperiments.P-valueswerecalculated usingbinomial tests. 54 Y.Takahashi&M.Watanabe tocopulateaftertandemformationduetofemalerejection. Effectofthetandem formationwithoutcopulation on mating preference needsto beinvestigated. CORDERO RIVERA & SAnCHEZ-GUILLEN (2007) indicated that the matingfrequency ofandromorphs was lowerthan thatof gynomorphs inI. el- egans. ROBERTSON (1985) suggested thatI. ramburi(Selys) malespotentially preferred gynomorphs because andromorphs resemble conspecific males, and thusthemaleshavedifficultyrecognizing anandromorph asapotentialmatedue to male-mimiccolouration.Elowever, inCoenagrion puella(L.), boththecolour andpatternofandromorphs differedfromthoseofconspecific males(JOOP et ah, 2007), indicating that the malesmight be able to distinguish andromorphs fromconspecific males.FINCKE et al.(2007) alsoreported thatthe reflectance spectrum ofthethorax inandromorphs differedfrom that inmales forE. ebri- umandE. hageni (Walsh). Inthepresent study, experienced males distinguished femalesfrommalesirrespective of themorphs ofthefemales,indicatingthatthe colourandpatternaloneoftheandromorphs didnotcause themtobemistaken formalesinI.senegalensis. Inthe field, E. civile(MILLER & FINCKE, 2004) and /. senegalensis males (TAKAHASHI & WATANABE,2009) had no mating preference in the early morning,suggesting thattemporal biasofmales’mating preference disappeared overnight. Becausethematingpreference ofthemalesconformedwiththeircop- ulationexperience, wildmalesmightchange theirmating preference inresponse to theirday-to-daycopulation experience. Thismatingpreference couldhelp the maleseasily distinguishindividualswhoare suitableformatingfromindividuals whoare not. Because mating attempts withunsuitableindividualsare probably costlyintermsoftimewasted (STOKS& DE BRUYN, 1998),learnedmaterec- ognition depending oncopulation experience mightincreasethemating success ofthemales. In I. senegalensis, most females in the field accepted copulation during the morning (TAKAHASHI& WATANABE,2009). If males matedrandomly in themorning withfemalesofeithermorphwithnopreference, thenthemajority ofthemaleswouldmate withthecommon morph inthe population. Therefore, the proportion ofmales that prefer each femalemorph in the afternoonmust coincidewith theproportion ofmorphs inthe femalepopulation.Thissuggests thatchanges in thepreference on thebasisofcopulation experience mightlead to thefrequency-dependent prevalence ofmalematingpreference foreachmorph (TAKAHASHI & WATANABE.2009). InI. senegalensis, femalesforageandoviposit aloneafter dailycopulation ac- tivity, i.e., intheafternoon. Themales tried to matewith foraging andoviposit- ing females, but fewfemalesaccepted thecopulation (SAWADA, 1999).Theat- temptby males to mate inthe afternoon mightinterferewith thebehaviourof femalesof searching for oviposition sites (CORDOBA-AGUILAR, 1993) or withovipositing itself(FINCKE, 1987). Becausemales thatharassed thecom- MatingexperienceinmaleIschnurasenegalensis 55 monmorphwouldoutnumbermalesthatharassedtherare morph, thecommon morphsweremorefrequently harassedby malesencountered(TAKAHASHI & WATANABE, 2010). This suggests thatthe common morph might havetheir reproductive success decreasedmorethantherare morphs. InI. elegans, females ofeach morphexhibiteda negative frequency-dependence intheirreproductive success (SVENSSON etah,2005). Therefore, inI.senegalensis, experience-based behaviouralchange inindividualmalesmightdrivemaintenanceoffemalemulti- plemorphs withinapopulation undernegative frequency-dependent selection. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Y.T.wassupportedby Research FellowshipsoftheJapanSocietyforthe Promotion ofScience forYoungScientists (20-104). REFERENCES BERGSTEN,X,A.TOYRA&A.N.NILSSON,2001. Intraspecificvariation andintersexual corre- lation insecondary sexualcharacters ofthree divingbeetles (Coleoptera:Dytiscidae).Biol. J.Linn. Soc. 73:221-232. CORDERO RIVERA, A.&F. EGIDOPEREZ, 1998. Matingfrequency,populationdensityand femalepolychromatisminthe damselflyIschnuragraellsii: ananalysisoffournatural popu- lations.Etologia6:61-67. CORDERORIVERA, A.& R.A.SANCHEZ-GUILLEN,2007. Male-like females ofadamselfly arenotpreferredby maleseveniftheyarethemajoritymorph.Anim. Behav. 74:247-252. CORDOBA-AGUILAR, A,, 1993.Populationstructure in Ischnura denticollis (Burmeister) (Zy- goptera;Coenagrionidae).Odonatologica22:455-464. FINCKE,O.M., 1987.FemalemonogamyinthedamselflyIschnuraverticalisSay(Zygoptera:Coe- nagrionidae).Odonatologica 16: 129-143. FINCKE, O.M., 1994.Femalecolourpolymorphismindamselflies: failuretorejectthenull hypo- thesis. Anim. Behav.47: 1249-1266. FINCKE, O.M., A. FARGEVIEILLE& T.D. SCHULTZ, 2007. Lack of innate preferencefor morphandspeciesidentityinmate-searchingEnallagmadamselflies. Behav.Ecol. Sociobiol. 61: 1121-1131. GAVRILETS,S.&D.WAXMAN,2002. Sympatricspeciationby sexualconflict.Proc. Nat.Acad Sci. USA 99: 10533-10538. HOLLAND,B,&W.R.RICE, 1998.Chase-awaysexualselection: antagonisticseduction versusre- sistance. Evolution 52: 1-7. JOHNSON, C., 1964. The inheritance offemale dimorphismin the damselfly,Ischnura damula. Genetics 49: 513-519. JOHNSON,C, 1966.Genetics offemale dimorphisminIschnura demorsa.Heredity 21:453-459. JOHNSON, C., 1975. Polymorphismand natural selectionin ischnuran damselflies. Evol. Theory 1:81-90, JOOP,G.,M.T.SIVA-JOTHY&J.ROLFF,2007.Femalecolourpolymorphism:genderandtheeye ofthe beholderin damselflies.Evol. Ecol20: 259-270. MILLER,M.N.&O.M.FINCK.E, 1999. Cuesformaterecognitionand theeffectofpriorexperi- enceonmaterecognitionin Enallagmadamselflies.JInsect Behav. 12:801-814. MILLER,M.N.&O.M.FINCKE, 2004. Mistakes in sexual recognitionamongsympatricZygo- 56 Y.Takahashi &M.Watanabe pteravarywith time ofdayand colourmorphism(Odonata:Coenagrionidae).hit. J. Odo- natol. 7:471-491. PARKER,G.A., 1979.Sexualselection andsexualconflict.In:M.S.Blum&N.A.Blum,[Eds],Sexual selection andreproductivecompetitionin insects, pp. 123-166,Acad. Press,New York. ROBERTSON,H.M.,1985.Femaledimorphismandmatingbehaviour inadamselfly,Ischnuraram- buri:femalesmimickingmales. Anim. Behav. 33: 805-809, SAWADA,K. 1999.Femalesexual receptivityand malecopulaguardingduringprolongedcopula- tionsin thedamselflyIschnura senegalensis(Odonata:Coenagrionidae).J.Ethol. 17:25-31. STOKS, R.& L.DE BRUYN, 1998. Unusualreproductiveassociations ofIschnuraelegans(Vander Linden)males(Zygoptera:Coenagrionidae).Notui odonatol. 5:3-7. SVENSSON, E.I.&J.ABBOTT, 2005.Evolutionary dynamicsandpopulationbiologyofapoly- morphicinsect.J. evol. Biol. 18: 1503-1514. SVENSSON.E.I.,J.ABBOTT&R.HARDING, 2005.Femalepolymorphism,frequencydepend- ence,and rapidevolutionarydynamicsin naturalpopulations.Am. Nat. 165: 567-576, TAKAHASHI, Y.& M.WATANABE,2009.Diurnal changesand frequencydependenceinmale matingpreferenceforfemalemorphsinthedamselfly,Ischnurasenegalensis(Rambur)(Odo- nata:Coenagrionidae).Enl. Sci. 12:219-226. TAKAHASHI,Y.& M.WATANABE,2010.Femalereproductivesuccessisaffectedbyselectivemale harassment inthedamselflyIschnurasenegalensis.Anim. Behav. 79:211-216. VANGOSSUM,H,L. DEBRUYN &R.STOKS,2005, Reversible switchesbetweenmale-male and male-female matingbehaviour bymaledamselflies. Biol. Let. 1:268-270. VAN GOSSUM,H.,R.STOKS&L. DEBRUYN,2001a. Discriminative matechoicein relation withfemale maturation in Ischnura elegans(Odonata:Coenagrionidae).Int.J. Odonatol 4: 83-91. VANGOSSUM,H.,R.STOKS&L. DEBRUYN,2001b.Reversible frequency-dependentswitches inmalematechoice. Proc. R. Soc. Land. (B) 268:83-85. VAN GOSSUM, H., R.STOKS, E.MATTHYSEN, F. VALCK & L.DE BRUYN, 1999. Male choice forfemalecolour morphsin Ischnura elegans(Odonata,Coenagrionidae):Testing thehypotheses.Anim. Behav. 57: 1229-1232.

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.