Table Of Content

Digitized by the Internet Archive 2012 with funding from in LYRASIS Members and Sloan Foundation http://archive.org/details/humaniti2001mary Winter 2001 jinIIVERSi. MARYLAN ,F PRl9 2Dr Maryland EG HUMANITIES b RECEIVED APR — Maryland The Thousand Last Years To Our Readers Well, it seemed only natural that the Maryland Humanities Council should devote an issue of its magazine to the last millennium. After all, it is our job to explore the history and culture that makes Maryland what it is today. And we are historians, so we know the tried and true methods: examine change over time and compare and contrast the major themes and events. At first it seems obvious. We know that over the past 1,000 years, the people who inhabited this land we call Maryland went from hunter-gatherers to farmers to urban industrial laborers to technological and service workers. We know that while they lost some self-sufficiency, they also gained certain freedoms. But the story is a little more complicated than that when we are dealing with 1,000 years of human contributions to our contemporary society. How do we remove ourselves from our modern frames of political, social, and eco- — — nomic reference to understand the people who populated this land for 1,000 years or even 200 years before us? Can we understand that Maryland's population was not fixed into divisions of black and white and native, but fluid and multiple? Can we step out of this time and space to see that our individual perceptions of race and identity and who contributed to Maryland society are cultural constructs of our present day? Will we miss the depth of our past because of our constricted view from the present? Should we consider the indigenous people who were here before the English and Africans began to arrive in this place they called Maryland? Of course, they were here first. The artificial political divisions of the land at that time were theirs, not ours. And since we cannot date exactly when changes in the native population occurred, should we deal with what we know about this population before this millennium began? Well, perhaps so. These questions account for the awkwardly balanced time frames of the articles you will read in this issue. We have asked some Maryland scholars to help transport us to the past. Dennis Curry deals with about 10,000 years of human existence before it was recorded for our region of this planet. Lois Green Carr writes of the seventeenth century and the changes that came with the arrival of the European and African immigrants. Jean Russo continues that examination as Maryland changes from province to state. Ric Cottom explores the nineteenth century and the impact of the war of state against state. And Bob Brugger takes a look at the century we have just left behind. We thank each of them. We also want to thank Julia King, Edward Chaney, and Iris Carter Ford for the clarity of their vision. Barbara Wells Sarudy Executive Director Cover: Seal ofthe State ofMaryland 3 Contents Millennium On the Brink of Contact: Native Maryland, 000-1600 1 By Dennis Curry Maryland's Seventeenth Century MARYLAND By Lois Green Carr HUMANITIES COUNCIL From Revolution to Revolution: Eighteenth-Century Maryland 1 By Jean Russo The Humanities include: Maryland in the Nineteenth Century: War, Memory, and the Archaeology Tragedy ofthe Commons 19 Artcriticism Comparative religion By Robert I. Cottom Ethics History Jurisprudence "Ain'tNothingWhat It Used to Be": Maryland in the Language Twentieth Century 24 Literature By Robert Brugger Philosophy J. Related social sciences Humanities in Maryland Maryland Bookshelf 35 CalendarofHumanities Events 38 An Interview with Carol Benson 45 Maryland HUMANITIES MarylandHumanitiesispublishedfourtimesa Council Staff yearinFebruary,May,September, and CarolBenson, PhD,SeniorProgramDirector November. ItisapublicationoftheMary- JudyD. Dobbs, DeputyDirector landHumanitiesCouncil, anindependent, StephenG. Hardy, PhD, DeputyDirector nonprofit,tax-exemptorganization. Our officesarelocatedatExecutivePlazaOne, BarbaraWellsSarudy, ExecutiveDirector Suite503, 11350McCormickRoad, Hunt BelvaJ.Scott, ProgramDirector Valley,Maryland21031-1002.Issuenumber PollyP.Weber, SeniorProgramOfficer 77.Allstatementsmadearetheopinionsof RobertI.Cottom, PhD, MagazineProductionEditor theauthorsanddonotnecessarilyreflect thoseoftheCouncil. Councilprogramsreceivemajorsupportfrom theNational Endowmentforthe Humani- ties,withadditionalfundingfromthe MarylandDivisionofHistoricalandCultural Programs,corporations, foundations, and individuals. On the Brink of Contact Native Maryland, 1000-1600 by Dennis C. Curry This millennium threatens to be Some two thousand years later, the last millennium to retain around 1000 AD, Native American remnants of the earliest human cultural development in Maryland culture in Maryland. The long, reached a threshold. In archaeo- complex story of humans here logical terms, this was the turning began over ten millennia ago. point at which the Middle Wood- Native tribal groups, with estab- land period with its hunter-gath- lished societies and cultures, did erer/early horticulturalist groups not meet the first arriving Europe- living in scattered hamlets evolved ans until the early 1600s. into groups of agriculturalists Maryland's first human inhabit- consolidating into tribal units and living in aggregated villages. ants, called "Paleoindians" by archaeologists, arrived at the end of Our knowledge of Maryland's the last glacial period, probably Middle Woodland period prior to around 9000 BC. The glacial envi- 1000 is primarily represented by the ronment had changed from its "Selby Bay Complex" in the Coastal chilling cool temperatures with Plain and centered in the Patuxent mastodons and mammoths roam- drainage. In western Maryland, ing over vast grasslands to a warmer much less is known of this period. post-glacial setting of forests The few archaeological sites found inhabited by smaller mammals seem to indicate distant and including elk, moose, deer, and outside cultural influences at — possibly caribou. The Paleoindians work from the Pennsylvania were hunter-gatherers organized Somerset Plateau to the north, from into regional semi-nomadic bands. West Virginia to the southwest, and These first settlers made their homes from the Clemson Island region of around local sources of high the lower Susquehanna to the quality cherts and jaspers, the raw northeast. The intervening eastern materials used for making stone "Theagedmaninhiswyntergarment."From Blue Ridge and Piedmont regions tforoolsm. hTuhnetyinagt,e fwihsahitngt,heayndglgeaatnheedr- JCoohurntWehsiytoef'tsh"ePBircittuirsehsLiobfrSauryn.dryThings. .. .'' ahpabpietaerdtaonhdavmeaybeheanvelarsgeerlvyedunaisn-a ing seasonal resources such as nuts buffer area between the western and tubers. Native American groups and the coastal Selby Bay groups during this During the vast Archaic period, available food resources allowed period. from around 8000 to 1000 BC, these their settlements to become more — early humans gradually adapted to sedentary, and social systems still Early inhabitants of the Selby Bay — continuing environmental changes. centered around bands operated Complex are noted for their arti- They invented the spearthrower as in more well-defined territories and facts made from exotic lithic smaller, more solitary animals such increased in complexity. materials (blue rhyolite, purple as deer began to dominate the The beginnings of the Woodland argillite, brown and green jaspers), region. The retreat of northern period about 1000 BC saw sweeping shell-tempered "Mockley" ceramics, glaciers and the resulting meltwa- lanceolate and stemmed projectile changes across all aspects of this ters began the transformation of points (referred to as the Selby Bay evolving society. As Native Ameri- the lower Susquehanna River into type), large cache blades, 3/4- cans settled into more sedentary the resource-rich estuary we know grooved axes, and two-hole ellipti- hamlets, they developed ceramics today as the Chesapeake Bay. The cal gorgets. The early inhabitants of and began to farm. increased variety and numbers of this period developed extensive Indiansaroundafire. FromJohn White's "PicturesofSundry Things. ..." White accompaniedSirWalterRaleigh 's " expeditionto"Virginia. CourtesyoftheBritishLibrary. procurement and storage/distribu- tion networks. This involved both trade and exchange as well as direct procurement. For instance, argillites from New Jersey may have been obtained through long-distance trade and exchange systems. They also established a direct system for extracting and distributing rhyolite from the Catoctin Mountain region of Maryland. This process involved people travelling from the Patuxent area to the Catoctin area, a distance of 70 miles or more. To make this system work, they developed a series of specialized sites: quarries for the actual extraction of rhyolite; nearby workshops for trans- forming raw blocks of material into transportable, useful forms called blanks; caches for temporary storage of these blanks; and rock- shelters for temporary campsites. clams, deer, beaver, turkey, turtle, Corn and beans first appear at sites During this time, people still sturgeon, acorn, hickory, and dating to around 1000 or slightly needed to hunt and gather their walnut. From these base camps/ earlier. In western Maryland, these food. Hunters were now using the storage sites, leaders would redistrib- crops were probably introduced by newly introduced (around 800) bow ute resources as needed, probably to Monogahela groups from nearby and arrow. In and around the a series of local hamlets. The Pennsylvania. In the Monocacy Patuxent region, archaeologists intensive exploitation and/or River valley, the appearance of have defined two types of sites horticulture of native plants was corn, beans, and squash is coinci- related to Middle Woodland clearly a component of the Selby dent with the immigration of subsistence. The first includes Bay Complex's diverse subsistence northern agricultural peoples (such widespread resource procurement base. as Owasco from New York) into the camps found in strategic settings region. Eventually corn agriculture where resources could easily be The Late Woodland period, begin- reached the Coastal Plain areas of exploited, especially seasonal ones ning in 1000, marked a point in the Potomac and Patuxent, and such as fish, nuts, or large stands of Maryland prehist—ory when all facets throughout the region settlement wild rice. After gathering resources, of native society settlement, patterns shifted to the major the people took their food to subsi—stence, and political struc- floodplains as the need for arable centralized base camps, detected ture began to change. Perhaps the land increased. By around 1400, archaeologically by the presence of most influential change was that most Native Marylanders became large storage pit features. The range Native tribes shifted from hunting reliant on agriculture throughout of resources that archaeologists and gathering to an agriculturally- Maryland, with the exception of have recovered from these storage oriented subsistence. Hunting the Eastern Shore. Here, direct features illustrates the breadth of certainly continued throughout the this food procurement system: Late Woodland period, but their evidence of the use of crops is extremely rare. oysters (from sources 30 miles increasing reliance on agriculture is away), freshwater and marine vividly reflected in the archaeological record. JohnWhite's1585drawingoftheIndianvillageof Pomeioocinmodern-dayNorthCarolina. Villagesin lira Marylandwereprobablysimilar. Thepresenceofa palisade,alsodocumentedinMaryland,atteststo theexistenceofconflictbetweennativegroupsof peopleevenbeforethearrivalofEuropeans. CourtesyoftheBritishLibrary. ossuary burial can be seen as a "community of the dead," reflective of the living communities organized during chiefdoms. After 1400, not only were villages becoming larger and more consoli- dated, but the people within those villages created a stronger communal identity. By 1450, many living in villages built defensive palisades to thwart intertribal hostilities. Initially, hostilities may have been a result of greater territoriality on the part of local groups and the need to control ever larger tracts of Also at this time, the vast trade These burials consist of the skeletal arable land for corn agriculture, but networks of the Middle Woodland remains of the deceased, collected eventually the situation was exacer- period broke down. Settlements after the flesh has decomposed, bated by incursions of foreign shifted to floodplains and grew in bundled together, and reinterred in groups such as the Senecas and size, and aggregated villages re- a secondary grave (often beneath Susquehannocks. Soon, however, — placed the scattered hamlets of the floor of a house). A hundred the ultimate foreigners Europe- — earlier times. Their greater self- years later, especially in the Coastal ans would arrive. reliance on agriculture, the consoli- Plain, all the dead from a village Western Maryland had witnessed dation of people into defined were buried in graves or placed in occupation by the Susquehannocks villages, and the more permanent scaffolds to allow the flesh to from the mid-1500s to the 1620s. nature of these villages reflected the decompose. Then, at regular inter- Captain Henry Fleet's journal places shift from band level to tribal vals, all the individual graves were the Massawomecks somewhere in society in Maryland. Eventually, exhumed and the bones gathered the upper Potomac in the summer this tribalization culminated in the up for communal reburial in one of 1632. From the mid-1600s to the chiefdoms witnessed by the first large, common pit known as an very late 1600s or early 1700s, when European settlers, such as the ossuary. Hundreds of individuals the Shawnee appear, western Piscataway of the lower Potomac were sometimes reburied in Maryland seems to have been region, and the Nanticoke of the ossuaries (one Piscataway ossuary largely uninhabited. Around 1714, Eastern Shore. near Accokeek contained the the Shawnee established King For much of Maryland prehistory, remains of more than 600 people), Opessa's Town at Oldtown, and by remains of those who died were and included all ages, from infants 1721 they had at least three other to the very elderly. interred singly or occasionally with settlements in western Maryland; in one or two others in burial pits. From an archaeological perspective, 1738, however, the Shawnee aban- The individuals may have been these different burial methods doned King Opessa's Town and placed in a flexed or an extended mirror societal changes. Early Maryland at large. position, and grave goods may individual burials served as an In the Piedmont, two different have been included or not, but efficient, practical method of groups appear to have resided in essentially interment consisted of disposal. Later, after groups of the Monocacy valley and the placing the body of the deceased in families had formed villages, middle Potomac region around a grave dug into the earth. Around bundle burials were curated at the 1400: people using shell-tempered 1300, bundle burials begin to household level, indicative of the pottery seem to have expanded into appear at sites in the Piedmont. source of power at the family level. the region from the south and/or And finally, the shift to mass