MAPS OF LUNAR HEMISPHERES ASTROPHYSICS AND SPACE SCIENCE LIBRARY A SERIES OF BOOKS ON THE RECENT DEVELOPMENTS OF SPACE SCIENCE AND OF GENERAL GEOPHYSICS AND ASTROPHYSICS PUBLISHED IN CONNECTION WITH THE JOURNAL SPACE SCIENCE REVIEWS Editorial Board J. E. BLAMONT, Laboratoire d'Aeronomie, Verrieres, France R. L. F. BOYD, University College, London, England L. GOLDBERG, Kitt Peak Nat. Observatory, Tucson, Ariz., U.S.A. C. DE JAGER, University of Utrecht, Holland Z. KOPAL, University of Manchester, Manchester, England G. H. LUDWIG, NASA, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md., U.S.A. R. L tiST, Institut fur Extraterrestrische Physik, Garsching-Miinchen, Germany B. M. MCCORMAC, Lockheed Palo Alto Research Laboratory, Palo Alto, Cali/., U.S.A. H. E. NEWELL, NASA, Washington, D.C., U.S.A. I.. I. SEDOV, Academy of Sciences of the U.S.S.R., Moscow, U.S.S.R. Z. SVESTKA, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany Secretary of the Editorial Board W. DE GRAAFF, Sterrewacht 'Sonnenborgh', University of Utrecht, Utrecht, Holland VOLUME 33 ANTONIN RDKL Prague, Czechoslovakia MAPS OF LUNAR HEMISPHERES GIVING THE VIEWS OF THE LUNAR GLOBE FROM SIX CARDINAL DIRECTIONS IN SPACE WITH A FOREWORD BY ZDENEK KOPAL EXIRA MATERIALS extras.springer.com SPRINGER-SCIENCE+BUSINESS MEDIA, B.V. Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 77-179896 ISBN 978-94-010-2881-3 ISBN 978-94-010-2879-0 (eBook) DOl 10 .1007/978-94-010-2879-0 All Rights Reserved Copyright (Booklet) © 1972 by Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht Originally published by D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland in 1972 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 1972 No part of this book may be reproduced in any form, by print, photoprint, microfilm, or any other means, without written permission from the publisher \dditionalmaterial to thi, hook rail he d()\~lIlo:Hkd from htt(I:lle"\tra'.'llrillg(·r.rnm .. TABLE OF CONTENTS MAPPING OF THE MOON - Foreword by Zdenek Kopal MAPS OF LUNAR HEMISPHERES 5 1. Coordinates of Places on the Lunar Surface 5 2. Orientation of the Six Maps of the Lunar Hemisphere and their Representation 6 3. Construction of the Maps 7 4. Lunar Nomenclature 8 I NDEX OF NAMED FORMATIONS 12 MAPPING OF THE MOON Manned landings on the Moon since 1969 have invoked new widespread interest on the part of lay as well as scientific public in our satellite and in the topography of its surface. The origin of human interest in details visible on the lunar surface goes back much further in the annals of history, and antedates the advent of telescopic astronomy in the early years of the 17th century. The Moon became, in fact, the first celestial body (other than the Earth) whose surface invited description in cartographic form. The first map of the Moon which came down to us - by William Gilbert (1540-1603) - must have been completed almost ten years before Galileo Galilei or Thomas Harriott turned their early telescopes to the Moon in 1609 and depicted for us what they saw. Since that time up to the past ten years, astronomical telescopes have remained our only link with our satellite, and the sole source of information on the topography of its surface; their increasing power of resolution has enabled us to make the degree of this acquaintance progressively more intimate. In the early part of the 17th century - at the time of Galileo Galilei - the optical power of telescopes then available enabled the early observers to resolve on the Moon details some 20-25 km in size. In the 3t centuries which elapsed since that time a greatly increased optical resolution of astronomical telescopes permitted resolution on the lunar surface, at favourable times, of details down to about 300 m. Below this limit, the telescopic outlines of individual surface features become irretrievably blurred in a haze arising from the diffraction of light (due to finite aperture of the telescope), unsteadiness of atmospheric 'seeing', or photographic plate grain. Moreover, due to the synchronism between the axial rotation of our satellite and its revolution around the Earth, only one-half of its face is accessible to direct ob servation at any particular time. It is true that, on account of librations exhibited by our satellite in the course of its motion, not less than 59% of the entire lunar globe can be seen from the Earth at one time or another; only 41% being permanently in visible; and an equal amount never disappearing; the remainder being alternately visible and invisible. The Moon does not, therefore, show us always exactly the same face; only approximately so; but the limb regions are usually seen in so fore shortened a form that the amount of detail recognisable then from the Earth is severely limited. A dramatic emergence of long-range space probes since 1959 has thoroughly changed the situation. On 7th of October 1959 - a memorable date in the annals of our science - the Russian spacecraft Luna 3 unveiled for us for the first time some of the principal features of a major part of the Moon's far side (to a resolution compar able with that of Galileo's first lunar observations in 1609); and subsequent space craft that followed in rapid succession soon overshadowed this initial exploit in 2 MAPS OF LUNAR HEMISPHERES range as well as accuracy. In particular, the American Lunar Orbiters 1-5 of 1966- 1968 have provided us with an almost complete photographic coverage of the lunar surface, on a resolution far greater than that attainable by any existing telescopes from the distance of the Earth. This is not the place in which to give a description of more technical aspects of these spacecraft. Suffice it to say that almost the entire surface of the Moon (with the exception of a small patch of lunar ground near the south pole) of 38 million km2 was photographed by them largely from overhead vantage points (thus obviating the effects of foreshortening) with a resolution between 100-200 m on the lunar surface; while almost 100000 km2 of the lunar front side was photographed by the Orbiters' large-aperture optics to a ground resolution of a few meters. As a result of this highly successful programme - augmented since by a large amount of additional photo graphy taken during the orbital stages of subsequent Apollo missions - we now possess a photographic coverage of the lunar surface almost as complete as aerial photography surveys of our own Earth. This total wealth of new topographic data, which has so suddenly come in our possession, has so far been utilized only to a limited extent for the purposes of lunar cartography; and the present new maps of the Moon constructed by Ing. Antonin Riikl, represent a significant contribution to the subject accomplished with their aid. His contribution can, moreover, claim originality not only by virtue of the novelty of the material on which his work was based, but also by the new way of its presentation. His six maps present to the reader the Moon as it would look from six mutually perpendi cular cardinal directions in space - its near and far side, its eastern and western hemi spheres, as well as the hemispheres seen from both poles. Not many people may hope to see the Moon from all these vantage points within our lifetime. However, space craft created by human hand have already seen it for us through their cameras; and of what they saw, Riikl's maps give (on their scale) a full and faithful account. His maps Nos. 2 and 4-6 of the Moon as seen from the East and West, as well as from both poles, are the first of their kind in the world selenographicalliterature. Antonin Riikl is, moreover, the first selenographer to have adopted for his work the Lambert azimuthal representation - i.e., one permitting him to project the actual lunar hemispheres on to plane maps, on which the relative areas of all parts are directly comparable on the same scale. This constitutes an attractive feature for a more general user interested mainly in appearances, and even more so for serious students of quantitative properties of the surface of our satellite. Another important and useful feature of Riikl's present maps is the fact that they are provided with the latest version of the nomenclature describing diverse lunar forma tions on both the front and far side of our satellite. Its details will be explained to us by Riikl more fully in the second part of this introduction; here we wish to mention briefly its origin and aims. The origin of the nomenclature now in use on the lunar surface -like on the Earth - was purely utilitarian and mnemotechnic: namely, to facilitate reference to individual features in terms more picturesque than numerical values of local coordinates (the MAPPING OF THE MOON 3 latter were not introduced to the Moon till around 1750 by Tobias Mayer). While the terrestrial geographic terminology had taken many centuries for its development, the parallel evolution on the Moon had much less time at its disposal so far. The first attempt to name formations seen on the Moon goes back to William Gilbert before 1603; though it extended only to spots visible with the naked eye. In contrast to Plutarch (and later Galileo), Gilbert regarded the predominant bright regions on the Moon to be seas, and dark regions as continents - possibly because he may have thought that seas predominated on the Moon as they did on the surface of the Earth. One lunar 'sea' well-known to us - Mare Crisium near the northeast limb of the visible face of our satellite - received from Gilbert the name of 'Britannia'; but other regions named by him are difficult to identify on our maps today. Galileo Galilei - rather surprisingly - did not name any feature on the Moon, described by him in general terms in his Sidereus Nuncius of 1610; and neither did Thomas Harriott (the latter referred to lunar features marked on his drawings by numbers). The first attempts at selenographic terminology in the telescopic era - by Langren (1645) or Hevelius (1647) - were based on heraldry or other similar ephemeral considerations; and as such are of only historical interest today. They do offer, how ever, some points of interest; and one can only marvel at the serendipity which led Hevelius in 1647 to bestow on the northern shores of the future Mare Tranquillitatis - the region where the first men landed on the Moon in July 1969 - the name of 'Apollonia'. The system of lunar nomenclature which eventually took root was that of Giovanni Battista Riccioli (1651), because it was also the first to be based on some logical scheme. In order to describe the lunar face, Riccioli used the names of philosophers and scholars (rather than of princes or other potentates) of antiquity -like Pythagoras or Thales, Aristoteles or Plato, and Archimedes with Aristarchus or Herodotus - to bestow on craters of the Moon's northern hemisphere; while the southern hemisphere became the domain of the famous savants of the Renaissance - like Copernicus, Regiomontanus, or Tycho - rubbing shoulders with saints (Theophilus, Cyrillus, or Catharina) and distinguished ecclesiastics (Clavius). Moreover, the names of the pupils and other epigons of great men were (in several instances) given by Riccioli to smaller formations in the neighbourhood of those called after their masters; so that they could continue to sit symbolically at their feet on the Moon as well. Riccioli was also the first selenographer to respect the principle of bestowing on lunar formations only the names of the savants of the past. Unlike Langren (who called one of the largest visible craters after himself), Riccioli wisely abstained from such an exhibitionism; though a crater was eventually named after him by his succes sors. Not all principles which guided Riccioli were respected too closely by his follow ers. The number of named lunar formations has continued, however, to grow in the course of time. Over five hundred of these can now be found on maps of the visible side of the Moon; and almost the same number has quite recently been appended to the Moon's far side. A full list of these has been compiled by Ing. Riikl to accompany his maps. 4 MAPS OF LUNAR HEMISPHERES It is, however, rather questionable whether many of these names will be used in practice elsewhere than on maps - especially those on the Moon's far side which can be seen only by astronauts. Nevertheless, some will undoubtedly survive the onslaught of digitization on scientific information in the decades and centuries to come - in the same way as ancient names of the stars in the sky may survive side by side with their more prosaic catalogue designations - to bear a witness to the fact that there was once romance in the sky, and ancestor-worship on the Moon. Both may be gone with the wind before stars have moved too far in their courses, and leave us on the Earth seeking solace in old Roman proverb that "Res victrix diis placuit, res victa Catoni". Manchester, England ZDENEK KOP AL