©EntomologicaFennica.6September2007 Lusitanoneura gen. n. (Diptera: Mycetophilidae), including a new species from Portugal EugéniaRibeiro&PeterChandler Ribeiro,E.&Chandler,P.2007:Lusitanoneuragen.n.(Diptera:Mycetophili- dae),includinganewspeciesfromPortugal.—Entomol.Fennica18:138–143. AnewgenusoffungusgnatsLusitanoneuragen.n.(Diptera:Mycetophilidae), allied to Ectrepesthoneura Enderlein, 1911, is described to include Ectre- pesthoneura chandleri Caspers, 1991 from Crete and Cyprus and L. grando- lensissp.n.fromPortugal.Thesespeciesareconsideredcongenericwitheach otherbutnotwiththebulkofspecieshithertoassignedtoEctrepesthoneura. E. Ribeiro, Departamento de Biologia Animal/Centro de Biologia Ambiental, FaculdadedeCiênciasdaUniversidadedeLisboa,CampoGrande,BlocoC2, 1749-016,Portugal.E-mail:[email protected] P. Chandler, 606B Berryfield Lane, Melksham, Wilts SN12 6EL, UK. E-mail: [email protected] Received20April2006,accepted20September2006 1.Introduction 2.Genusdescription AprogrammeofMalaisetrappingatsitesinPor- Lusitanoneuragen.n.Ribeiro&Chandler tugalhasbeencarriedoutinrecentyearsbyone ofus(ER)andmaterialwascollectedinto70per Diagnosis. Similar to Ectrepesthoneura in the centethanol.Atoneofthesesitesbothsexesofa followingcharacters:antennalflagellumslender; darkcolouredfungusgnat,whichwasevidently thorax with mediotergite and laterotergite bare; undescribed, were found. This species had the finetibialsetulaenotinregularrows;wingwith wingvenationandmostothercharacterstypical macrotrichiaabsentfromthemembrane;veinSc of the genus Ectrepesthoneura Enderlein, 1911 ending in R; vein R less than twice as long as 1 butobviouslydifferedinstructureofitsmalegen- crossveinr-m;veinR presentandendinginR 4 1; italiafromanypreviouslyknownspecies.Itdid, CuAbranchingveryclosetothebaseofthewing. however,havesomesignificantcharacters,espe- Differing from Ectrepesthoneura as follows: cially of the male genitalia, in common with E. body and legs of more slender build; male mid chandleriCaspersandthesetwospeciesarecon- tibiaunmodified,lackinganyswellingorsecond- sideredtodiffersufficiently fromtheotherspe- ary sexual characters in arrangement of setae; cies assigned to Ectrepesthoneura to propose a gonocoxitesseparatemedially(fusedatleastba- new genus to include them. It is probable that sallyonventralmargininEctrepesthoneuraex- some other species placed in Ectrepesthoneura, cept E. gracilis); gonostylus large but set sub- suchasE.gracilisEdwards,1928willbefoundto apicallywithgonocoxitesbroadlyextendeddor- deservesuchachangeofstatuswhentheworld sally(setclosetoapicalmarginofgonocoxitesin faunaofthisgroupisbetterknown. Ectrepesthoneura); gonostylus broad medially, ENTOMOL.FENNICAVol.18 (cid:127) Lusitanoneuragen.n.(Mycetophilidae) 139 butextendeddorsally andventrally asnarrower broadandapicallytruncate,formingaflapunder lobes (of various form in Ectrepesthoneura but thegenitalia.Tergite9longerthanbroad,atleast usually more compact and without elongate partlycoveringthebaseofthegenitaliadorsally lobes); tergite 9 of various form but differing butdifferinginforminthetwoincludedspecies. fromthatinEctrepesthoneurawhichusuallyhas Gonocoxiteslargeandbroadlaterally,butmedi- itlargeand broadly enclosing thegenitaliador- allyseparatetothebase,withoutanysclerotised sallyandlaterally(exceptE.graciliswhichhasit bridge, linked internally only by gonocoxal shortandsmall). apodemeslinkedtoparameresofaedeagus.Go- Description.Male.Headwithshortbristling. nostyluslargebutsetsubapicallyandnotextend- Ocellithree,inatransverserow,thelateralssitu- ing much beyond tip of gonocoxites distally; atedalmostasfarfromtheeyemarginasfromthe broadmedially,broad,producedtoaslenderlobe medianocellus.Antennaslightlyupturned,with at both dorsal and ventral edges. Cerci short, scapeandpedicelshort;flagellum14segmented, small,inclosecontactwithaedeagus.Aedeagus slender, with elongate flagellomeres, bearing with narrow median sclerotised apodeme and shorthairs;apicalflagellomereslenderwithsmall weaklysclerotisedparamereslaterally. apical protuberance. Proboscis short; palpus Female.Verysimilartomale.Abdomenwith aboutaslongashead,withfourobviouspalpo- segment 7 about half as long as preceding seg- meres,thetwobasalshortandthickandaboutas ments;tergites8and9narrow;sternite8longer, longasbroad,thepenultimatemoreelongateand deeplyemarginatemedially,withroundedlateral theterminalpalpomerelongandslender. lobesbearingsomemarginalsetae.Cercustwo- Thoraxwithbristlingontheprothorax,meso- segmented;basalsegmentbroad,elongate;apical notumandscutellum;bristlingonmesonotumin- segmentshort,rounded. cludingacrostichalanduniserialdorsocentralse- Type-species: Lusitanoneura grandolensis ries and longer setae near side margins. Pleura sp.n. otherwise, laterotergite and mediotergite bare. Etymology.Thegenusisnamedtoreflectthe Katepisternumlargerthananepisternum,bothir- known distribution of the newly described spe- regularly quadrate; laterotergite elongate oval, cies,fromLusitania,LatinforPortugal. shallowlyraisedmedially.Legslongandslender. Tibial spurs elongate, 1:2:2. Mid tibia without any swellingorsensory areaapparent.Midand 3.Speciesdescriptions hindtibiaewithseriesofblacksetae,shorterthan width of tibia. Wing membrane with uniform Lusitanoneuragrandolensissp.n. covering of microtrichia, macrotrichia absent. Ribeiro&Chandler Costaandradialveinsthickenedanddarkerthan otherveins.Costaandradialveinsbearingshort Material examined. Holotype male, Portugal, setae, the veins of median and posterior forks Herdade da Ribeira Abaixo, near Grândola withinconspicuoussmallsetulae.Costaextend- (south-west of Alentejo), found at 150–240 m ingnearlyorquitehalfdistancefromtipofR to a.s.l,22.IV.2001–19.V.2001,Malaisetrap,leg.E. 5 that of M. Vein Sc long, ending in R. Vein R Ribeiro. Paratypes (all same locality as holo- 1 4 present,shortandvertical,endinginR,forming type): 1 # 1 $, 18.XII.1997 – 6.I.1998; 1 #, 1 asmallelongaterectangularradialcell.Crossvein 03.XII.1998–31.I.1999; 1 $, 21.XI.1999–20. r-mdiagonal, long but shorter than both R and XII.1999 (allex Malaisetraps, leg. E. Ribeiro). 1 the stem of median fork. Branches of posterior All type material deposited in Departamento de fork sessile, beginning close to base of wing, BiologiaAnimal/CentrodeBiologiaAmbiental, branchingattheirpointofcontactwiththebaseof Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de veintb.Haltereyellow. Lisboa,Portugal. Abdomenwithsegments1–6normallydevel- Diagnosis.ThisspeciesagreeswithL.chand- oped,withtergitesandsternitesofsimilarlength. leriinexternalcharactersandlackingthemidtib- Tergites of segments 7 and 8 are narrow strips ialorgan.Italsohasagonostylusofsimilarstruc- whiletheirsternitesaremoreelongate;sternite8 ture,beingproducedintoslenderlobesonitsven- 140 Ribeiro&Chandler (cid:127) ENTOMOL.FENNICAVol.18 Fig.2.WingofLusitanoneuragrandolensissp.n. (length3.3mm). seriesofveryshortpandvsetae.Wingclear(Fig. 2).Costaandradialveinsthickenedandbrown- ish,otherveinsyellowish.Costaandradialveins bearing short setae, the series on R extending 5 back to apical half of crossvein r-m. Costa ex- tendingnearlyhalfdistancefromtipofR tothat 5 ofM.Haltereyellow. Fig.1.Lusitanoneuragrandolensissp.n.malehead 1 Abdomen entirely dark, including genitalia, (heightofhead0.6mm).–a.Anteriorviewofhead, butwithbristlingpale.Tergite9(Fig.3c)longer includingbasalthreeflagellomeresofantennae. thanbroad,apicallytruncateandslightlyemargi- –b.Palpus. natemediallyonapicalmargin;coveringthebase ofthegenitaliadorsally,butrelativelysmall,only tral and dorsal margin. It does, however, obvi- about half as long as gonocoxites. Gonocoxites ouslydifferintheformoftergite9,whichissim- (Fig. 3a) broad laterally, with apical margins pleinthenewspeciesbutproducedmediallyinto mainly straight-edged but produced to a point anelongateapicallyroundedprocessinL.chand- apicallyneartheirdorsalmargin;mediallysepa- leri. rate to the base. Gonostylus (Fig. 3b) laterally Description. Male. Head (Fig. 1a) dark flattened,broadandsetosebasallywithaslender brown,withshortdarkbristling.Antennaentirely apicallyasetoselobeatdorsalandventraledges; dark; scape and pedicel about as long as broad; basal part with a rounded protuberance bearing flagellumslender,longerthanheadandthoraxto- long setae, otherwise with scattered fine setae. gether; flagellomeres about 3 times as long as Aedeagus closely apposed to small cerci (Fig. broad, bearing short pale hairs; apical flagello- 3d), with narrow median sclerotised apodeme merealittlelonger.Proboscisshort;palpus(Fig. andweaklysclerotisedparameres. 1b) about as long as eye, with two basal palpo- Female. Very similar to male, apart from meres about as long as broad, the penultimate structure of abdomen as described for genus. moreelongateandtheterminalpalpomereaslong Sternite8withlaterallobesbearingsomestrong as the preceding palpomeres together, mostly marginalsetae(Fig.4). slenderbutslightlyswollenonapicalquarter. Winglength3.3mm(male),3.5mm(female). Thorax dark brown with brownish yellow Etymology.Thenewspeciesisnamedforthe bristling on the prothorax, mesonotumand scu- typelocality. tellum;acrostichalsanddorsocentralsshort,setae Distribution.ThelocalityHerdadedaRibeira near side margins of mesonotum longer; two Abaixo(38º8’N,8º33’W,UTM29SNC3717)is pairsofstrongscutellars.Pleura,laterotergiteand afarmof221hectares,situatedatSantaMarga- mediotergitebare.Legsyellowishbrown,coxae rida da Serra in the Grândola mountains, 7 km darkerbrown,withallbristlingdark.Tibialspurs southofthecityofGrândola. yellow;outerspursonmidandhindtibiaemore Biology.Unknown.Thepredominantbiotope than twice as long as width of tibial apex. Mid wheretheholotypeandonefemaleparatypewere tibiawith2–4aanddsetaeandaseriesofvery found is at 150–240 metres altitude and com- shortpsetae;hindtibiawith6–9a,3–6p-dand prisesacorkoak(Quercussuber)grove,typical ENTOMOL.FENNICAVol.18 (cid:127) Lusitanoneuragen.n.(Mycetophilidae) 141 Fig.3.MalegenitaliaofLusi- tanoneuragrandolensissp.n. (lengthofgonocoxites0.7mm, lengthoftergite90.4mm). –a.Ventralview.–b.Lateral viewofgonostylus.–c.Tergite 9.–d.Ventralviewofaedea- gus,cercislightlydisplacedbe- hind. of the Mediterranean climate of this area. This sitealsohasasignificantpresenceofCistussalvi- folius, C. ladanifer and Lavandula luisieri. The otherearliercollectedspecimenswereinadiffer- ent biotope on the same farm, also a cork oak grovebutassociatedwithameadow. Lusitanoneurachandleri (Caspers,1991),comb.n. Ectrepesthoneurachandleri Fig.4.Lusitanoneuragrandolensissp.n.,lateralview Caspers,1991:325,Figs7–10. ofovipositor(lengthofbasalsegmentofcercus0.25 mm). Additional material examined (in P.J. Chandler collection unless otherwise stated). GREECE, Crete,northofOmalos,1,500ma.s.l,17.V.1982, PRUS,Platres,1,400ma.s.l,21.V.1983,1$,be- smallgorge,1#,leg.I.F.G.McLean;Crete,west sideandaboveCaledonianFalls,GoldenOakfo- of Mesa Potami, 19.V.1982, flowing stream in rest and plane trees by the stream, leg. I.F.G. cultivated area, 1 $, leg. I.F.G. McLean; CY- McLean;AkrountaForest,24.IV.2002,1#,leg. 142 Ribeiro&Chandler (cid:127) ENTOMOL.FENNICAVol.18 P. Gatt (private collection, Malta); Troodos Mountains,Troodosenv.,11.IV.2002,1$,pine forest,leg.J.Rohá(cid:1)ek(SilesianMuseum,Opava, CzechRepublic). Remarks.Caspers(1991)describedthisspe- ciesfromasinglemalefromCreteandreferredto a male and female from Cyprus, but as the ovipositorofthefemalewasinpoorconditionhe did not describe or figure it. The fresh material fromCreteand Cyprusreported by Chandler et al.(2006)andalsolistedaboveenablesthistobe figuredhere. InCaspers’descriptionthereferencetothird segmentofpalpiispresumablytotheterminalor 4thdistinctpalpomere.Thetibialspursaremore stronglydevelopedthaninL.grandolensis,3–4 timesaslongasapicalwidthoftibia.Caspersre- ferred to the slender curved process (termed by him semilunar) from the inner surface of the gonocoxites(asbasimeres),astructurethatisnot developedinthePortuguesespecies.Hisdescrip- tionandfigureofthegonostylusdoesnotindicate the presence of the narrow ventral lobe, which wasprobablyreflexeddorsallyinsituinthespec- imen he figured. The male genitalia are figured here(Fig.5a–b),bothtoshowthisandforcom- Fig.5.Lusitanoneurachandleri(Caspers).–a.Ventral parisonwiththenewspecies. viewofmalegenitalia(lengthofgonocoxites0.6mm). Description of female. Very similar to male, –b.Maletergite9(length0.6mm).–c.Lateralview differinginthegenitalcharacterswhicharesimi- ofovipositor(lengthofbasalsegmentofcercus0.2 lar to the female of L. grandolensis: abdominal mm). segment 7 about half as long as preceding seg- ments;ovipositor(Fig.5c)yellowishbrownwith tergites8and9narrow;sternite8longer,deeply indicated by Caspers (1991) this is a plesio- emarginate medially, with rounded lateral lobes morphouscharacterinMycetophilidae,although bearing fine marginal setae. Cercus two-seg- presentinrelativelyfewextantgenera.Thephy- mented; basal segment broad, elongate; apical logenetic conclusions of Søli (1997) acknowl- segmentshort,rounded.Winglengthoffemales edge the primitive nature of this character in 3.7–3.8mm. Drepanocercus Vockeroth but the position of EctrepesthoneurainthetreesinFigs45and46of thatworksuggeststhatthiscouldbeasecondary 4.Discussion developmentinthisgenus,althoughinthesecond of these trees it does appear in a basal position The species here assigned to the new genus amongthegeneraofLeiinae. LusitanoneuraruntothegenusEctrepesthoneura ThemajorityofspeciesnowplacedinEctre- EnderleininthekeytofamilyMycetophilidaeby pesthoneuraappeartoconstituteamonophyletic Sølietal.(2000),duetopossessingthecharacters group as discussed by Chandler (1980) but the citedasincommonwithitintheabovegenericdi- MediterraneanspeciesE.gracilisEdwards,1928 agnosis.Thepracticallysessileposteriorforkhas was indicated to differ in structure of genitalia beenusedtodefineEctrepesthoneuraasdistinct andhabitus,beingmoreslenderwithlongerlegs fromthealliedgenusTetragoneuraWinnertz.As than other species of the genus and was not in- ENTOMOL.FENNICAVol.18 (cid:127) Lusitanoneuragen.n.(Mycetophilidae) 143 cludedinthediagnosis.WhenCaspers(1991)de- semblagethatcouldnotbejustifiedphylogeneti- scribed E. chandleri it was apparent that it was cally. Further study is necessary including all alsodivergentfromthetypicalformofthegenus; characterstoresolverelationships. itresembledE.gracilisinformbutagaindiffered stronglyinstructureofgenitaliaandinlackinga Acknowledgements.Wearegratefultothecollectorswho sensoryarea(tibialorgan)onthemalemidtibia, referredthenewmaterialofL.chandleritous.Thework waspartiallyfinancedbyCentrodeBiologiaAmbiental. whichispresentingracilisasinotherspeciesof thegenus. ItispossiblethatEctrepesthoneuragracilisis References related to the new genus. It also has the gono- coxites separate medially. The structure of the Caspers,N.1991:NewandremarkablespeciesofMyceto- ovipositorfiguredbyChandlerandGatt(2000)is philoidea (Diptera, Nematocera) from the Medi- very similar to that of Lusitanoneura grando- terraneanregion.—Spixiana14:321–338. lensis, agreeing in the presence of strong mar- Chandler,P.J.1980:TheEuropeanandeasternNearctic ginal setae on sternite 8, while these setae are fungus-gnatsinthegenusEctrepesthoneura(Myceto- philidae).—Syst.Entomol.5:27–41. finerinL.chandleri.Itis,however,excludedat Chandler,P.J.2004:Mycetophilidae.In:deJong,H.(ed.), presentbecauseitpossessesamalemidtibialor- Fauna Europaea: Diptera, Nematocera. — Fauna ganandtherearedifferencesinthemalegenitalia Europaeaversion1.1.[wwwdocument]URLhttp:// suchastheformofthegonostylus.Asimilarovi- www.faunaeur.org. positor with strong setae on sternite 8 is also Chandler,P.J.2006:AdditionsandchangestotheBritish faunaoffungusgnats(Diptera:Mycetophilidae).— foundinsomeotherGnoristinaeincludingBole- Bt.J.Ent.Nat.Hist.19:77–89. tinatrivittata(Meigen,1818)andintherecently Chandler,P.J.&Gatt,P.2000:FungusGnats(Diptera: discovered female of Creagdhubhia mallo- Bolitophilidae, Keroplatidae and Mycetophilidae) chorumChandler,1999(Chandler2006). fromtheMalteseislands.—StudiaDipterol.7:69–81. Thesubfamilyortribalpositionofthesegen- Chandler,P.J.,Bechev,D.&Caspers,N.2006:TheFun- gus Gnats (Diptera: Bolitophilidae, Diadocidiidae, eraisstillnotresolved.Onthebasisofthewing Ditomyiidae, Keroplatidae and Mycetophilidae) of venation they have traditionally been placed in Greece, its islands and Cyprus. — Studia Dipterol. Leiini(orLeiinae)butVäisänen(1986)strongly (2005)12:255–314. arguedfortheirinclusioninGnoristinae(treated Søli,G.1997:OnthemorphologyandphylogenyofMy- astribeGnoristinibysomeauthors)andwehave cetophilidae,witharevisionofCoelosiaWinnertz.— Entomol.Scand.,Suppl.50:1–139. followedhimintheassignmentofgenera,includ- Søli,G.E.E.,Vockeroth,J.R.&Matile,L.2000:Families ing in the systematic arrangement in Fauna ofSciaroidea.—In:Papp,L.&Darvas,B.(eds),Con- Europaea (Chandler 2004). As indicated above tributionstoaManualofPalaearcticDiptera,Appen- Søli(1997)suggestedthattheyshouldberetained dix:604.ScienceHerald,Budapest. inLeiinionthebasisofhisphylogeneticconclu- Väisänen,R.1986:ThedelimitationoftheGnoristinae: criteriafortheclassificationofrecentEuropeangener- sionsbasedonnon-genitalcharacterswhilesug- a(Diptera,Mycetophilidae).—Ann.Zool.Fenn.23: gesting that Gnoristini was a plesiomorphic as- 197–206.