Jeffrey Burton Russell Lucifer The Devil in the Middle Ages Corned. University Press Ithaca and London Copyright © 1984 by Cornell University Press All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations in a review, this book, or parts thereof, must not be reproduced in any form without permission in writing from the publisher. For information, address Cornell University Press, 124 Roberts Place, Ithaca, New York 14850. First published 1984 by Cornell University Press. Second printing, 1988. First printing, Cornell Paperbacks, 1986. Second printing, 1988. International Standard Book Number 0-8014-1503-9 (cloth) International Standard Book Number 0-8014-9429-x (paper) Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 84-45153 Printed in the United States of America Librarians: Library of Congress cataloging information appears on the last page of the book. The paper in this book is acid-free and meets the guidelines for permanence and durability of the Committee on Production Guidelines for Book Longevity of the Council on Library Resources. For the Caseholts, Kaufmans, Ratcliffs, and Traynors, whose kindness and wisdom made my youth in Berkeley a happy one. LAETEEFCABANT IUVENTUTEM MEAM. ■) Contents List of Illustrations 9 Preface 11 1. The Life of Lucifer >9 2. The Devil in Byzantium 28 3. The Muslim Devil 52 4. Folklore 62 5. Early Medieval Diabology 92 6. Lucifer in Early Medieval Art and Literature 129 7. The Devil and the Scholars •59 8. Lucifer in High Medieval Art and Literature 208 9- Lucifer on the Stage 245 10. Nominalists, Mystics, and Witches 2 74 11. The Existence of the Devil 302 Essay on the Sources 3*3 Bibliography 331 Index 347 ■) List of Illustrations Christ separating the sheep from the goats, mosaic, sixth century 24 Meister of Schloss Lichtenstein, The Temptation of Christ, oil on canvas, fifteenth century 33 Christ raises Lazarus from the dead, Byzantine manuscript illumination 39 Christ pointing out the traitor Judas, manuscript illumination, eleventh century 45 Cernunnos, the Celtic horned god of the wilderness, detail from the Gundestrup cauldron, second or first century b.c. 70 The legend of Theophilus, manuscript illumination, c. 1200 75 Demons in hell depicted as stylized monsters, manuscript illumination, fifteenth century 109 Saint Jerome tempted by an imp-like Devil, manuscript illumination, fifteenth century * * 3 Angels beheading the Beast of the Apocalypse, manuscript illumination, eleventh century 116 An Anglo-Saxon portrayal of the magician James, manuscript illumination, eleventh century >37 to List of Illustrations Hell as a giant monster swallowing the damned, manuscript illumination, eleventh century ’43 Christ leading John the Baptist and the Hebrew patriarchs out of hell, manuscript illumination, c. 1150 146 Christ drawing the just out of hell, manuscript illumination, c. 1200 ’5° Saint Michael and a demon disputing the fate of a soul, altar frontispiece, thirteenth century ’79 The archangel “binds the Dragon,” manuscript illumination, eleventh century i8z Giotto, Judas receiving payment for his betrayal of Christ, oil on canvas, 1306 186 Satan torturing the damned while he is bound to a fiery grill, manuscript illumination, fifteenth century ’9’ Michael Pacher, Saint Wolfgang and the Devil, oil on canvas, fifteenth century 228 Dante surrounded by hell, purgatory, the heavenly spheres, and heaven, tempera on wood, fourteenth century 229 Demons tormenting sinners for avarice and usury, fresco by Taddeo di Bartoli, 1362-1422 234 Eve and the serpent, statue, thirteenth century 258 The Devil as an amorphous monster devouring sinners, fresco by Giusto da Menabuoi, fourteenth century 262 Witches bestowing the osculum infame on the Devil’s posterior, manuscript illumination, fifteenth century 289 Goya, Aquelarre, oil on canvas, 1794/1795 294 The witch of Berkeley being carried off by the Devil, woodcut, fifteenth century 298 Preface This third volume in the history of the concept of the Devil follows The Devil (1977) and Satan (1981). The first volume traced the concept through the period of the New Testament; the second took it to the mid-fifth century, by which time its basic lines had been drawn. The present volume describes ideas about the Devil that were prevalent in the Middle Ages. It includes Eastern Orthodox and Islamic views but emphasizes Western Christian thought, which gives the Devil most due. Because I do not know the languages requisite to a study of Islam in detail, I offer only a brief comparative description of its view of the Devil. The primary components of Christian diabology in the medi eval period are patristic, scholastic, and mystical theology; art, liter ature, and drama; popular religion, homiletics, and saints’ lives; and folklore. Although a few medieval literary works distinguish between the persons of Satan and Lucifer, the tradition as a whole affirms their unity and uses the terms indiscriminately as names of a single person age, the Devil, the personification of evil. The name “Lucifer” was born through the association of the great prince of Isaiah 14, the morning star, Helel-ben-Shahar, who falls from the heavens through his pride, with the cherub of Ezekiel 28, who was “perfect in his ways 12 Preface from the day he was created until iniquity was found in him,” and of both with Satan, prince of this world and obstructor of the kingdom of God. Exactly when the three concepts came together is uncertain, but Origen treated them as a unity in the third century. Throughout these volumes I have been drawing the history of a concept. My philosophy is unabashedly idealist; it assumes that ideas are important in themselves and that the social context in which they arise is less important for understanding the ideas than the other way around. I differ from the materialism presently dominant in the histor ical profession and deny that modern materialism possesses any objec tive framework within which or by which ideas are to be judged. Rather, the first function of history is to open our minds to the infinite wealth of possible world views and to help us to understand that our own view, whatever it may be, is precarious, limited, and open to sudden and radical change. The social context influenced diabology only in a broad sense— early medieval culture, dominated by monasticism, followed the tradi tional view of the Devil developed by the desert fathers; later, the rise of towns permitted the growth of universities and the scholastic ap proach to diabology and theology in general. But the similar develop ment of Christian and Muslim ideas of the Devil and the closeness of seventeenth-century Protestant views to thirteenth-century scholastic ones indicate that vastly different social settings could produce nearly identical ideas. On the whole diabology changed during this period in refined detail rather than on main points. This unusual consistency follows from the general consistency of Christian theology in the Middle Ages, which can be attributed to its relative cultural isolation and security from threatening new ideas. Only from the late seventeenth century, when Europe was awash with new ideas, did Christianity come under a broad criticism that forced it to amend its views in fundamental ways. Diabology was more consistent than other aspects of theology, proba bly because a useful means of dehumanizing one’s opponents was to accuse them of being tools of Satan. Diabology was not subjected to serious attack until the witch craze of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries had produced intolerable cruelties founded on and justified by belief in the Devil. Because the sources are much more numerous for medieval than for earlier diabology, this book can offer only a rational selection. Certain themes important in themselves but tangential to the personification of