Long Term Accommodation Plan

203 Pages·2016·25.98 MB·English

2
0
1
5
-
2
0
1
Long Term
6

Accommodation
Plan
April 1, 2016
Revised April 7, 2016
Table of Contents

Introduction _____________________________________________________________________ 1
Capital Project Initiatives ____________________________________________________________ 2
Enrolment and Boundary Issues Summary Table _________________________________________ 4
Long Range Projection Methodology __________________________________________________ 8
Glossary of Terms ________________________________________________________________ 10
“How to Read the LTAP” Guide _______________________________________________________ 11
Historical Enrolments _____________________________________________________________ 14
SK to Grade 1 French Immersion Historical Progression ___________________________________ 17
Grade 8 to Grade 9 French Immersion Historical Progression _______________________________ 18
Projected Enrolments ______________________________________________________________ 19
Elementary and Secondary Review Areas ______________________________________________ 25
Burlington ________________________________________________________________ 25
Oakville ___________________________________________________________________ 81
Milton ____________________________________________________________________ 133
Halton Hills ________________________________________________________________ 169

LTAP - April 1, 2016 HALTON DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD

Introduction
The Long Term Accommodation Plan (LTAP) is an annually reviewed planning tool that provides enrolment projections and
guides accommodation planning for a ten-year time period. The 2015/2016 LTAP provides enrolment projections for the
years 2016 to 2025 for each Elementary and Secondary Review Area (ERA and SRA), and each elementary and secondary
school in the Board. Projecting future enrolments is a trend analysis exercise that incorporates quantitative data from
existing school communities, new growth from developments and birth data. The LTAP also identifies accommodation
pressures resulting from these projected enrolments and proposes strategies to address them.
The purpose of this plan is to identify new capital project initiatives for the Board from 2017/2018 to 2020/2021 in
preparation for any potential updates as required by the Ministry of Education for the Capital Priorities Template. It also
provides an opportunity to identify boundary studies and to address accommodation pressures due to new residential
development, changing demographics, and program pressures. Proposed strategies and studies will adhere to HDSB’s
Program and Accommodation Review Policy, Community Planning and Partnership Policy, and other policies and
administrative procedures.
Due to the dynamic nature of program and accommodation planning, capital project initiatives contained within this plan
should be viewed as proposed solutions and may change with changing accommodation pressures faced by the Board. In
addition, the Board is currently undertaking a “Program Viability Review” as it relates to the provision of English and French
Programming within the Board. The results of this review and approval of recommendations by the Board could eventually
impact the areas where there are enrolment issues, including low English Program enrolment (dual track schools) and empty
pupil places.
Enrolment projections are dated April 1, 2016.
LTAP
Long Term Enrolment Projections developed.
(See Methodology)
CAPITAL PRIORITIES
NEW BOUNDARIES Projections provide basis for Capital
IMPLEMENTED Priorities Submissions (Funding
Boundary Reviews are completed and Requests to the Ministry for New
new boundaries are implemented. Schools and Additions).
These changes are then modelled in
the development of the next LTAP. (See Elementary and Secondary Capital
Project Initiatives)
BOUNDARY REVIEWS &PROGRAM AND
ACCOMMODATION REVIEWS
In some cases funding approvals guide the need for
Boundary Reviews (e.g. when boundaries are established
for new schools). In other cases Program and
Accommodation Reviews are required to be completed
in advance of funding requests (e.g. Oakville SW #1 ps).
(See Boundary & Enrolment Issues Summary Table)
LTAP - April 1, 2016 HALTON DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD 1
Elementary Capital Project Initiatives

Completed Projects
Status of Formal
New OTG Source
School Approval of
School (ERA) Year of Impact School of
(Owned by Funding from
Capacity Funding
HDSB) Ministry
Heritage Glen PS (ERA 115) 2015/2016 780 Yes Yes Yes
6 classroom retrofit/addition.
Oodenawi PS (ERA 118) 2015/2016 776 Yes Yes Yes
Boyne PS (ERA 127) 2015/2016 776 Yes Yes Yes

Projects in Progress
Status of Formal
New OTG Source
School Approval of
School (ERA) Year of Impact School of
(Owned by Funding from
Capacity Funding
HDSB) Ministry
Alton Village PS (ERA 109) 2016/2017 855 Yes Yes Yes
5 Classroom addition.
Martin Street PS Rebuild (ERA 119) 2017/2018 753 Yes Yes Yes

Proposed Projects Subject to Ministry Funding and/or Site Acquisition/Availability
Proposed Status of Formal
Source
OTG School Approval of
School (ERA) Year of Impact of
School (Owned by Funding from
Funding
Capacity HDSB) Ministry
Milton SW #10 ps (ERA 127) 2018/2019 776 No No No
Timing is contingent on Ministry funding, site
acquisition and issuance of Municipal Approvals
/Building Permits.
Milton SW #11 ps (ERA 127) 2020/2021 776 No No No
Timing is contingent on Ministry funding, site
acquisition and issuance of Municipal Approvals
/Building Permits.
Oakville NE #2 ps (ERA 118) 2018/2019 776 In process No No
Timing is contingent on Ministry funding, site
acquisition and issuance of Municipal Approvals
/Building Permits.
Oakville SW #1 ps (ERA111) TBD 740 Yes No No
Subject to undertaking a Program and
Accommodation Review (PAR). Size of facility
ultimately dependent on PAR. Also, timing is
contingent on Ministry funding and issuance of
Municipal Approvals/Building Permits.

LTAP - April 1, 2016 HALTON DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD 2
Secondary Capital Project Initiatives

Completed Projects
Status of Formal
OTG Source
School Approval of
School (SRA) Year of Impact School of
(Owned by Funding from
Capacity Funding
HDSB) Ministry

Projects in Progress
Status of Formal
OTG Source
School Approval of
School (SRA) Year of Impact School of
(Owned by Funding from
Capacity Funding
HDSB) Ministry
Craig Kielburger SS (SRA 105) 2017/2018 1389 Yes Yes Yes
10 classroom addition.

Proposed Projects Subject to Ministry Funding and/or Site Acquisition/Availability
Proposed Status of Formal
Source
OTG School Approval of
School (SRA) Year of Impact of
School (Owned by Funding from
Funding
Capacity HDSB) Ministry
Milton SW #1 hs (SRA 104) 2019/2020 1200 No No No
Timing is contingent on Ministry funding, site
acquisition, and issuance of Municipal
Approvals /Building Permits.
Oakville NE #1 hs (SRA 108) 2020/2021 1200 No No No
Timing is contingent on Ministry funding, site
acquisition and issuance of Municipal
Approvals /Building Permits.

LTAP - April 1, 2016 HALTON DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD 3
Burlington Elementary Enrolment and Boundary Issues Summary Table
Planning Available Over-Utilized Over-Utilized
2015 2015 2015 Available Space UNDER UTILIZATION OVER UTILIZATION
Area School Space Space in School Space
Enrolment OTG Total Cap in School (%)
(ERA) (#) (%) (#) 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
ALDERSHOT ELEM 255 460 690 205 45% 220 248 248 246 246 52% 46% 46% 47% 47%
0 GLENVIEW 319 366 458 47 13% 44 65 54 55 48 88% 82% 85% 85% 87%
0
1 KING'S ROAD 201 337 383 136 40% 131 140 135 134 140 61% 58% 60% 60% 59%
MAPLEHURST 378 519 634 141 27% 139 127 127 142 138 73% 76% 75% 73% 73%
ERA TOTAL 1153 1682 2165 529 31% 534 580 565 576 571 68% 66% 66% 66% 66%
BURLINGTON CENTRAL 244 345 391 101 29% 64 82 100 69 54 81% 76% 71% 80% 84%
CENTRAL 343 409 409 66 16% 71 75 74 79 84 83% 82% 82% 81% 79%
1
0 LAKESHORE 217 328 466 111 34% 103 97 87 80 77 69% 70% 74% 76% 77%
1
TOM THOMSON 443 274 504 62% 169 164 162 173 144 144 160% 159% 163% 153% 152%
ERA TOTAL 1247 1356 1770 109 8% 74 92 88 84 71 95% 93% 94% 94% 95%
JOHN T. TUCK 731 541 725 35% 190 199 179 161 154 171 137% 133% 130% 128% 132%
PAULINE JOHNSON 269 242 380 11% 27 22 14 7 17 22 109% 106% 103% 107% 109%
2
0 RYERSON 234 527 665 293 56% 301 286 287 270 277 43% 46% 45% 49% 48%
1
TECUMSEH 257 442 603 185 42% 174 186 196 197 192 61% 58% 56% 55% 56%
ERA TOTAL 1491 1752 2373 261 15% 254 279 315 296 276 86% 84% 82% 83% 84%
FRONTENAC 463 777 892 314 40% 309 305 288 265 238 60% 61% 63% 66% 69%
3 MOHAWK GARDENS 362 504 688 142 28% 162 176 184 188 185 68% 65% 64% 63% 63%
0
1 PINELAND 770 662 800 16% 108 39 94% 114 98 69 26 117% 115% 110% 104%
ERA TOTAL 1595 1943 2380 348 18% 357 383 402 426 461 82% 80% 79% 78% 76%
BRANT HILLS 261 420 558 159 38% 134 124 136 128 129 68% 71% 68% 70% 69%
BRUCE T. LINDLEY 335 354 584 19 5% 27 24 24 34 28 92% 93% 93% 90% 92%
5
0 C.H. NORTON 515 583 767 68 12% 82 91 76 98 92 86% 84% 87% 83% 84%
1
PAUL A. FISHER 194 305 581 111 36% 122 135 140 141 140 60% 56% 54% 54% 54%
ERA TOTAL 1305 1662 2490 357 21% 365 374 376 400 389 78% 78% 77% 76% 77%
CLARKSDALE 461 553 829 92 17% 102 94 93 101 101 82% 83% 83% 82% 82%
DR. CHARLES BEST 268 297 550 29 10% 26 39 53 64 59 91% 87% 82% 79% 80%
6
0 ROLLING MEADOWS 462 584 860 122 21% 113 107 135 105 102 81% 82% 77% 82% 82%
1
SIR E. MACMILLAN 377 415 553 38 9% 62 60 71 67 66 85% 86% 83% 84% 84%
ERA TOTAL 1568 1849 2792 281 15% 303 300 352 338 327 84% 84% 81% 82% 82%
CHARLES R. BEAUDOIN 811 722 814 12% 89 18 29 54 98% 96% 92% 73 35 110% 105%
7
0 FLORENCE MEARES 610 645 783 35 5% 32 46 35 95% 93% 95% 19 32 103% 105%
1
ERA TOTAL 1421 1367 1597 4% 54 11 53 10 23 99% 96% 99% 98% 41 103%
ALEXANDERS PS 731 645 921 13% 86 34 87 117 144 95% 87% 82% 78% 20 103%
8 JOHN WILLIAM BOICH 817 717 993 14% 100 9 14 99% 98% 86 50 13 112% 107% 102%
0
1 ORCHARD PARK 547 544 820 1% 3 6 36 55 99% 93% 90% 29 9 105% 102%
ERA TOTAL 2095 1906 2734 10% 189 80 162 213 96% 91% 89% 135 25 107% 101%
9
0 ALTON VILLAGE 947 740 1,039 28% 207 113 152 177 227 235 136% 141% 145% 152% 153%
1
0
1 KILBRIDE 277 363 593 86 24% 91 101 109 109 103 75% 72% 70% 70% 72%
1
Indicates <200 Empty Pupil Places or < 60% Utilization Indicates Projected Enrolment Exceeding Total Capacity
100% 100%
OTG - Provincially recognized pupil place capacity of the school building, which may include addi(cid:415)ons, or altera(cid:415)on to the school building. This figure is recognized as the opera(cid:415)ng capacity of the school. This figure does not include portables or portapaks.
Total Cap (Total Capacity)- The total of the OTG pupil places and portable and portapak capacity pupil places.
LTAP - April 1, 2016 HALTON DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD 4
Oakville Elementary Enrolment and Boundary Issues Summary Table
Planning Available Over-Utilized Over-Utilized
2015 2015 2015 Available Space UNDER UTILIZATION OVER UTILIZATION
Area School Space Space in School Space
Enrolment OTG Total Cap in School (%)
(ERA) (#) (%) (#) 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
BROOKDALE 276 354 469 78 22% 89 101 109 115 128 75% 71% 69% 67% 64%
EASTVIEW 456 562 838 106 19% 102 82 105 105 92 82% 85% 81% 81% 84%
GLADYS SPEERS 374 395 510 21 5% 32 40 39 53 68 92% 90% 90% 87% 83%
2
1 OAKWOOD 161 360 475 199 55% 200 195 199 203 202 44% 46% 45% 44% 44%
1
PINE GROVE 739 567 843 30% 172 168 143 121 109 78 130% 125% 121% 119% 114%
W.H. MORDEN 542 429 636 26% 113 173 226 259 236 211 140% 153% 160% 155% 149%
ERA TOTAL 2548 2667 3771 119 4% 82 48 71 132 201 97% 98% 97% 95% 92%
E. J. JAMES 540 377 607 43% 163 175 184 189 213 201 146% 149% 150% 156% 153%
JAMES W. HILL 553 501 777 10% 52 4 99% 56 44 19 14 111% 109% 104% 103%
3
1 MAPLE GROVE 545 561 607 16 3% 28 58 77 70 69 95% 90% 86% 87% 88%
1
NEW CENTRAL 262 259 374 1% 3 15 27 38 37 34 106% 110% 115% 114% 113%
ERA TOTAL 1900 1698 2365 12% 202 218 197 169 194 161 113% 112% 110% 111% 109%
CAPTAIN R. WILSON 668 668 944 11 30 50 56 98% 96% 93% 92% 3 100%
4 EMILY CARR 834 743 1019 12% 91 17 98% 44 36 20 5 106% 105% 103% 101%
1
1 PALERMO 792 718 994 10% 74 24 97% 63 24 24 7 109% 103% 103% 101%
ERA TOTAL 2294 2129 2957 8% 165 38 97 98% 95% 110 48 14 105% 102% 101%
ABBEY LANE 352 441 579 89 20% 105 115 116 128 134 76% 74% 74% 71% 70%
FOREST TRAIL 853 708 984 20% 145 146 133 102 68 37 121% 119% 114% 110% 105%
5 HERITAGE GLEN 731 780 872 49 6% 34 17 26 39 39 96% 98% 97% 95% 95%
1
1 PILGRIM WOOD 666 685 961 19 3% 23 27 43 46 63 97% 96% 94% 93% 91%
WEST OAK 870 703 1117 24% 167 134 96 67 44 35 119% 114% 110% 106% 105%
ERA TOTAL 3472 3317 4513 5% 155 16 101 164 100% 97% 95% 119 70 104% 102%
MONTCLAIR 399 458 481 59 13% 58 63 65 66 84 87% 86% 86% 86% 82%
MUNN'S 529 492 607 8% 37 63 83 113 132 147 113% 117% 123% 127% 130%
6 POST'S CORNERS 539 600 876 61 10% 59 64 88 102 129 90% 89% 85% 83% 79%
1
1 RIVER OAKS 515 636 912 121 19% 164 106 44 74% 83% 93% 38 124 106% 120%
SUNNINGDALE 626 613 843 2% 13 18 64 90 104 122 103% 110% 115% 117% 120%
ERA TOTAL 2608 2799 3719 191 7% 200 86 93% 97% 5 107 181 100% 104% 106%
FALGARWOOD 412 536 674 124 23% 135 144 148 132 160 75% 73% 72% 75% 70%
7 JOSHUA CREEK 925 806 1082 15% 119 24 53 97% 93% 89 66 11 111% 108% 101%
1
1 SHERIDAN 232 242 426 10 4% 7 17 21 24 25 97% 93% 91% 90% 90%
ERA TOTAL 1569 1584 2182 15 1% 53 95 158 180 238 97% 94% 90% 89% 85%
8
1 OODENAWI PS 600 776 1052 176 23% 5 99% 92 194 278 361 112% 125% 136% 146%
1
Indicates <200 Empty Pupil Places or < 60% Utilization Indicates Projected Enrolment Exceeding Total Capacity
Oakville SW #1 ps -There are currently no schools in ERA 111. Students residing in the review area are divided between ERA 103 and ERA 112. A
Program and Accommodation Review would be required before consideration could be given to building a school on this site.The site is board
owned.
OTG - Provincially recognized pupil place capacity of the school building, which may include addi(cid:415)ons, or altera(cid:415)on to the school building. This figure is recognized as the opera(cid:415)ng capacity of the school. This figure does not include portables or portapaks.
Total Cap (Total Capacity)- The total of the OTG pupil places and portable and portapak capacity pupil places.
LTAP - Revised April 7, 2016 HALTON DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD 5
Milton Elementary Enrolment and Boundary Issues Summary Table
Planning Available Over-Utilized Over-Utilized
2015 2015 2015 Available Space UNDER UTILIZATION OVER UTILIZATION
Area School Space Space in School Space
Enrolment OTG Total Cap in School (%)
(ERA) (#) (%) (#) 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
E.W. FOSTER 393 328 604 20% 65 82 60 50 41 35 125% 118% 115% 112% 111%
J.M. DENYES 207 343 527 136 40% 131 132 143 142 140 62% 61% 58% 59% 59%
MARTIN STREET 221 282 397 61 22% 86 571 577 580 511 70% 24% 24% 23% 32%
9
1 ROBERT BALDWIN 438 426 702 3% 12 7 28 20 31 39 98% 93% 95% 93% 91%
1
SAM SHERRATT 578 415 645 39% 163 194 191 173 178 167 147% 146% 142% 143% 140%
W.I. DICK MIDDLE 395 412 481 17 4% 11 1 97% 100% 16 3 11 104% 101% 103%
ERA TOTAL 2232 2206 3356 26 463 518 531 477 83% 81% 80% 82% 41 102%
BRUCE TRAIL 1108 850 1218 30% 258 255 237 216 189 162 130% 128% 125% 122% 119%
CHRIS HADFIELD 799 593 1099 35% 206 199 194 172 159 158 134% 133% 129% 127% 127%
0 HAWTHORNE VILLAGE 1137 723 1229 57% 414 387 346 312 270 238 154% 148% 143% 137% 133%
2
1 IRMA COULSON 1015 793 1161 28% 222 256 286 269 263 255 132% 136% 134% 133% 132%
TIGER JEET SINGH 1113 896 1172 24% 217 236 252 240 242 227 126% 128% 127% 127% 125%
ERA TOTAL 5172 3855 5879 34% 1317 1333 1314 1210 1123 1039 135% 134% 131% 129% 127%
ANNE J MACARTHUR 956 839 1253 14% 117 147 241 305 365 414 118% 129% 136% 144% 149%
1 ESCARPMENT VIEW 1093 853 1175 28% 240 240 232 210 209 186 128% 127% 125% 125% 122%
2
1 P. L. ROBERTSON 960 818 1094 17% 142 153 180 180 191 172 119% 122% 122% 123% 121%
ERA TOTAL 3009 2510 3522 20% 499 540 653 695 765 772 122% 126% 128% 130% 131%
3
2 BROOKVILLE 402 420 512 18 4% 22 44 62 73 99 95% 89% 85% 83% 76%
1
7
2 BOYNE PS (Milton #9) 513 776 1052 263 34% 18 369 660 881 1094 102% 148% 185% 214% 241%
1
Indicates <200 Empty Pupil Places or < 60% Utilization Indicates Projected Enrolment Exceeding Total Capacity
Martin Street PS Rebuild - Students from Martin Street PS are temporarily at Boyne PS in ERA 127 as they await the opening of the newly
constructed 753 pupil place facility. Projected utilization and empty spaces are based on the status quo. A Boundary Review study will be
undertaken to expand the catchment resulting in full utilization of the new, larger school.
Halton Hills Elementary Enrolment and Boundary Issues Summary Table
Planning Available Over-Utilized Over-Utilized
2015 2015 2015 Available Space UNDER UTILIZATION OVER UTILIZATION
Area School Space Space in School Space
Enrolment OTG Total Cap in School (%)
(ERA) (#) (%) (#) 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
ETHEL GARDINER 620 625 901 5 1% 27 71 101 122 120 104% 111% 116% 119% 119%
JOSEPH GIBBONS 136 213 443 77 36% 72 66 65 70 73 66% 69% 69% 67% 66%
4 PARK 227 283 375 56 20% 64 70 67 64 69 77% 75% 76% 77% 76%
2
1 SILVER CREEK 568 645 921 77 12% 91 116 144 141 173 86% 82% 78% 78% 73%
STEWARTTOWN 355 331 469 7% 24 18 14 33 28 94% 96% 90% 91% 19 106%
ERA TOTAL 1906 2097 3109 191 9% 181 199 190 186 222 91% 90% 91% 91% 89%
CENTENNIAL 439 492 768 53 11% 70 65 48 42 45 86% 87% 90% 92% 91%
5 GEORGE KENNEDY 504 584 745 80 14% 82 70 52 36 36 86% 88% 91% 94% 94%
2
1 HARRISON 219 343 458 124 36% 127 135 154 165 166 63% 61% 55% 52% 52%
ERA TOTAL 1162 1419 1971 257 18% 279 270 254 242 247 80% 81% 82% 83% 83%
GLEN WILLIAMS 222 262 354 40 15% 47 57 47 49 57 82% 78% 82% 81% 78%
LIMEHOUSE 155 187 233 32 17% 40 42 54 59 62 79% 77% 71% 69% 67%
6 MCKENZIE-SMITH BENNETT 669 749 910 80 11% 79 90 80 75 97 89% 88% 89% 90% 87%
2
1 PINEVIEW 192 307 583 115 37% 120 123 125 130 130 61% 60% 59% 58% 58%
ROBERT LITTLE 350 400 584 50 13% 59 76 92 111 118 85% 81% 77% 72% 71%
ERA TOTAL 1588 1905 2664 317 17% 345 388 398 423 463 82% 80% 79% 78% 76%
Indicates <200 Empty Pupil Places or < 60% Utilization Indicates Projected Enrolment Exceeding Total Capacity
OTG - Provincially recognized pupil place capacity of the school building, which may include addi(cid:415)ons, or altera(cid:415)on to the school building. This figure is recognized as the opera(cid:415)ng capacity of the school. This figure does not include portables or portapaks.
Total Cap (Total Capacity)- The total of the OTG pupil places and portable and portapak capacity pupil places.
LTAP - Revised April 7, 2016 HALTON DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD 6
Secondary Enrolment and Boundary Issues Summary Table
Planning Available Over-Utilized Over-Utilized
2015 2015 2015 Available Space UNDER UTILIZATION OVER UTILIZATION
Area School Space Space in School Space
Enrolment OTG Total Cap in School (%)
(SRA) (#) (%) (#) 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
ALDERSHOT 436 558 558 122 22% 114 82 92 84 97 80% 85% 84% 85% 83%
BURLINGTON CENTRAL 595 870 996 275 32% 302 301 281 285 277 65% 65% 68% 67% 68%
LESTER B. PEARSON 416 642 936 226 35% 245 247 255 261 289 62% 61% 60% 59% 55%
0
0 M. M. ROBINSON 730 1347 1599 617 46% 646 696 705 703 714 52% 48% 48% 48% 47%
1
NELSON 998 1341 1593 343 26% 349 293 264 256 230 74% 78% 80% 81% 83%
ROBERT BATEMAN 799 1323 1386 524 40% 521 559 582 583 597 61% 58% 56% 56% 55%
SRA TOTAL 3974 6081 7068 2107 35% 2177 2177 2179 2172 2203 64% 64% 64% 64% 64%
1
0 DR. FRANK J HAYDEN SS 1408 1194 1446 18% 214 360 430 525 541 605 130% 136% 144% 145% 151%
1
ABBEY PARK 956 891 1143 7% 65 142 156 170 204 174 116% 118% 119% 123% 120%
IROQUOIS RIDGE 1358 1218 1344 11% 140 220 281 327 318 363 118% 123% 127% 126% 130%
2 OAKVILLE TRAFALGAR 1245 1158 1389 8% 87 111 89 114 59 63 110% 108% 110% 105% 105%
0
1 T.A. BLAKELOCK 1124 1335 1419 211 16% 226 249 227 204 147 83% 81% 83% 85% 89%
WHITE OAKS S.S. 1867 1797 2301 4% 70 106 167 224 273 378 106% 109% 112% 115% 121%
SRA TOTAL 6550 6399 7596 151 353 445 608 651 830 106% 107% 109% 110% 113%
3
0 GARTH WEBB 1092 1203 1455 111 9% 25 147 242 272 258 102% 112% 120% 123% 121%
1
4
0 MILTON DISTRICT 922 1053 1305 131 12% 4 100% 149 305 457 598 114% 129% 143% 157%
1
5
0 CRAIG KIELBURGER SS 1506 1179 1557 28% 327 381 192 319 431 481 132% 114% 123% 131% 135%
1
ACTON DISTRICT 445 654 843 209 32% 209 189 180 170 158 68% 71% 72% 74% 76%
7
0 GEORGETOWN DISTRICT 1656 1683 1683 27 2% 27 64 88 82 54 98% 96% 95% 95% 97%
1
SRA TOTAL 2101 2337 2526 236 91 236 253 268 251 213 90% 89% 89% 89% 91%
Indicates <200 Empty Pupil Places or < 60% Utilization Indicates Projected Enrolment Exceeding Total Capacity
Oakville NE #1 hs - There are currently no schools in SRA 108. Students are directed to schools in SRA 102. The proposed new high school is
identified to open in 2020/2021 subject to Site Acquisition, Ministry Funding Approvals and municipal permits.
OTG - Provincially recognized pupil place capacity of the school building, which may include addi(cid:415)ons, or altera(cid:415)on to the school building. This figure is recognized as the opera(cid:415)ng capacity of the school. This figure does not include portables or portapaks.
Total Cap (Total Capacity)- The total of the OTG pupil places and portable and portapak capacity pupil places.
LTAP - April 1, 2016 HALTON DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD 7