Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2004 The Art of History: Livy's Ab Urbe Condita and the Visual Arts of the Early Italian Renaissance Jillian Curry Robbins Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES THE ART OF HISTORY: LIVY’S AB URBE CONDITA AND THE VISUAL ARTS OF THE EARLY ITALIAN RENAISSANCE By JILLIAN CURRY ROBBINS A Dissertation submitted to the Program in the Humanities in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Degree Awarded: Spring Semester, 2004 The members of the Committee approve the dissertation of Jillian Curry Robbins defended on November 8, 2004. ________________________ Jack Freiberg Professor Directing Dissertation ________________________ Nancy T. de Grummond Outside Committee Member ________________________ David H. Darst Committee Member The Office of Graduate Studies has verified and approved the above named committee members. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I would like to thank my husband, Eric, for his patience and support during the dissertation process. I would also like to thank my mother for her incisive editing and ready ear. I am also extremely grateful to the staff and fellows of the Center for Hellenic Studies, who provided endless understanding and encouragement. Finally, I would like to express my appreciation to the members of my committee for their assistance, particularly as the project began to take shape. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures.............................................................................................................................v Abstract.....................................................................................................................................vi CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................1 Aims of the Present Study.......................................................................................................1 Argument and Methodology....................................................................................................2 CHAPTER 2: LIVY’S AB URBE CONDITA: ANCIENT COMPOSITION AND RENAISSANCE RECEPTION.................................................................................................10 Formative Influences.............................................................................................................10 Methods of Composition.......................................................................................................13 Structure and Style................................................................................................................16 Reception and Revival of the Text.........................................................................................25 The “Cult of Livy”................................................................................................................33 Livy in Fifteenth-Century Italian Society..............................................................................40 CHAPTER 3: LIVY’S AB URBE CONDITA IN THE VISUAL ARTS OF THE RENAISSANCE.......................................................................................................................50 Development and Diffusion..................................................................................................50 CHAPTER 4: LIVY, ALBERTI, AND THE RENAISSANCE ISTORIA................................80 Non-Livian Influences on Livian Narratives in the Visual Arts.............................................80 Leon Battista Alberti and the Renaissance Istoria..................................................................95 CHAPTER 5: LIVIAN ART IN ITS BROADER CONTEXT................................................105 Livian Art in the Sixteenth Century.....................................................................................108 Implications of the Present Study........................................................................................113 APPENDIX: CHECKLIST OF EXAMPLES..........................................................................115 BIBLIOGRAPHY...................................................................................................................219 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH...................................................................................................245 iv LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Engraving, Marcus Curtius. Lucas Cranach, early sixteenth century.........................71 Figure 2. Roman carnelian gem, Mucius Scaevola;..................................................................77 Figure 3. Roman lapis lazuli gem, Mucius Scaevola;................................................................77 Figure 4. Spalliera, The Banquet of Tarquin. Anonymous, Cracow,........................................86 Figure 5. Roman Republican silver denarius. Museum of Fine Arts, Boston.........................128 v ABSTRACT This study assembles the representations of Livy’s Ab urbe condita in the visual arts of the Italian Renaissance, focusing on the fifteenth century and following the imagery as it developed in the early part of the sixteenth century. Analysis of these images, presented as a checklist in the appendix, shows that art based on Livy’s text first became prevalent in the domestic painting of Tuscany in the second half of the Quattrocento. As painted furnishings fell out of fashion, the imagery of the Ab urbe condita was taken up by makers of small metal plaquettes and painted maiolica. These highly portable media and the artistic environment that created them provided a vehicle for the dissemination of these Livian images throughout central and northern Italy in the first half of the sixteenth century. Examination of these images reveals a growing awareness of Livy’s literary text in Italy during the period from 1450 to 1550. The development of this Livian art in many ways parallels that of Italian art as a whole. The role of these images in Italian society emphasizes the importance of the Ab urbe condita not only in the scholarly community, but in the political and social spheres of the Italian elite as well. This study further demonstrates that the concept of istoria, or narrative painting, as put forth by Leon Battista Alberti in the years 1435 and 1436, was both influenced by the Ab urbe condita and shaped the artistic interpretations of Livy’s history. The distinctive character of Livy’s Latin narrative helped to shape its depictions in Tuscan domestic painting of the second half of the fifteenth century, which in turn played an important role in establishing the visual imagery of the Livian plaquettes and maiolica of the first half of the sixteenth century. Alberti’s definition of istoria, created with dramatic narratives like Livy’s in mind, was influential in establishing a visual vocabulary for the depiction of these Livian stories that could then be adapted for use on a smaller scale in plaquettes and maiolica. vi CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Aims of the Present Study History is not a work of philosophy, it is a painting; it is necessary to combine narration with the representation of the subject, that is, it is necessary simultaneously to design and to paint… --François-René Chateaubriand What chiefly makes the study of history wholesome and profitable is this, that you behold the lessons of every kind of experience set forth as on a conspicuous monument; from these you may choose for yourself and for your own state what to imitate, from these mark for avoidance what is shameful in the conception and shameful in the result.1 --Livy The Roman historian Titus Livius, writing around the year 27 B.C., recorded his view of history in the introduction to his own account of the Roman state, entitled Ab urbe condita (“From the Founding of the City”). Livy’s history reflects this notion that the value of history lies in the human actions it presents. The chronological narrative of the Ab urbe condita centers around the deeds and personalities of the men and women who shaped the history of Rome from its beginnings. This treasure trove of exemplars, both positive and negative, was a central 1 “Hoc illud est praecipue in cognitione rerum salubre ac frugiferum, omnis te exempli documenta in inlustri posita monumento intueri; inde tibi tuaeque rei publicae quod imitere capias, inde foedum inceptu, foedum exitu, quod vites.” Livy praef. 10. Translation is by B. O. Foster, in Livy, with an English translation by B.O. Foster, 14 vols. Loeb Classical Library (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1919-59), 1:3. 1 element in the rise in awareness of Livy’s history among the elite of fifteenth-century Tuscany. As the knowledge of and interest in Livy’s text grew, a corresponding rise in the number of artistic interpretations of the Ab urbe condita began to develop. This study will examine the seminal role of fifteenth-century Tuscan domestic painting in the establishment of a distinctive visual vocabulary for the depiction of episodes from Livy’s history, and the subsequent diffusion of that vocabulary in the small-scale private art of the first quarter of the sixteenth-century. It will be shown that analysis of these fifteenth- and early sixteenth-century works of art based on Livy’s history reinforces the role of small, portable works of art in disseminating themes and motifs drawn from antiquity throughout central and northern Italy. It will be further argued that the concept of istoria, or narrative painting, as put forth by Leon Battista Alberti in the years 1435 and 1436, was both influenced by the Ab urbe condita and shaped the artistic interpretations of Livy’s history. Finally, it will be demonstrated that the distinctive character of Livy’s literary narrative helped to shape its depictions in Tuscan domestic painting of the second half of the fifteenth century, which in turn played an important role in establishing the visual imagery of the Livian plaquettes and maiolica of the first half of the sixteenth century. Argument and Methodology Chapter 2: Ancient Composition and Renaissance Reception Chapter Two introduces the text of Livy’s Ab urbe condita and its composition, demonstrating the historian’s use of vocabulary and grammatical structure to shape the narrative and create dramatic and affecting episodes within his broader account of Rome’s history. Next, the transmission of the text during the Middle Ages is examined, culminating with a discussion of the role of Petrarch in assembling and emending the text as it was known at that time. Chapter Two also deals with the “cult of Livy,” examining the interest in Livy’s personality and work that was inspired by the discovery of his putative tomb in his hometown of Padua in the second quarter of the fourteenth century. Finally, this chapter explores the awareness of the Ab urbe 2 condita in fifteenth century Italy, from the public life of Florence to the court of Alfonso of Aragon in Naples. This chapter makes extensive use of the scholarship of the Italian scholar Giuseppe Billanovich. His work on the medieval transmission of the text of the Ab urbe condita demonstrates that the different Decades, or groups of ten books, suffered widely varying fates.2 Building on the work of Billanovich, Ronald Witt argues further that the multilingual culture of the educated classes in the twelfth-century Veneto fostered the interest in classical philology in general, and in Livy in particular, seen in the work of the Paduan poet and scholar Lovato Lovati (1240-1309) and his circle.3 Most significantly, Billanovich’s work establishes the centrality of Petrarch in both the textual tradition of the Ab urbe condita and the recognition of Livy’s account as a prime source for the history and values of ancient Rome. Along with Pierre de Nolhac, Billanovich was the first to identify the manuscripts owned and annotated by Petrarch. His work is also instrumental in defining Petrarch’s pivotal role in the fledgling philological and humanist movements of northern Italy in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries.4 2 Giuseppe Billanovich, “Dal Livio di Raterius (Laur. 63,19) al Livio del Petrarca (B.N., Harl. 2493),” Italia medioevale e umanistica 2 (1959): 103-78; Giuseppe Billanovich, “The Role of the Papal Library in Saving Livy’s Histories,” in The Classics in the Middle Ages, Papers of the Twentieth Annual Conference of the Center for Medieval and Early Renaissance Studies, ed. Aldo S. Bernardo and Saul Levin (Binghamton, NY: Center for Medieval and Early Renaissance Studies, 1990), 79-94. 3 Ronald G. Witt, In the Footsteps of the Ancients: The Origins of Humanism from Lovato to Bruni (Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2000), 82-112. 4 Pierre de Nolhac, “Le Tite-Live de Pétrarque,” Giornale storico della letteratura italiana 18 (1891): 440; Giuseppe Billanovich, La tradizione del testo di Livio e le origini dell’umanesimo, 2 vols. Studi sul Petrarcha, no. 9 (Padua: Editrice Antenore, 1981); Giuseppe Billanovich, “Petrarch and the Textual Tradition of Livy,” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 14 (1951): 137-208. 3
Description: