Hughes, Nicholas David (2011) Living with cancer in old age: a qualitative systematic review and a narrative inquiry. PhD thesis. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/2651/ Copyright and moral rights for this thesis are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Glasgow Theses Service http://theses.gla.ac.uk/ LIVING WITH CANCER IN OLD AGE: A QUALITATIVE SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND A NARRATIVE INQUIRY Living with Cancer in Old Age: A Qualitative Systematic Review and a Narrative Inquiry Nicholas David Hughes MSc., BA (Hons.) Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of PhD. Medical Sociology Medical Research Council Social and Public Health Sciences Research Unit College of Social Sciences University of Glasgow December 2010 1 LIVING WITH CANCER IN OLD AGE: A QUALITATIVE SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND A NARRATIVE INQUIRY Abstract „Living with Cancer in Old Age‟ is an exploration of older people‟s experiences of living with cancer, using qualitative research methods. A qualitative systematic review of international literature found that the experience of living with cancer in old age is characterised by ambiguity. There are sources of suffering, imposed by cancer itself, by treatments for cancer and by co-morbid disease. At the same time older people have access to sources of comfort and strength, both internal (attitudes of mental fortitude) and external (strong relationships with family, friends, communities and health professionals) which mitigate the worst effects of suffering. This literature study synthesised and interpreted findings from 11 studies covering a heterogeneous population of people aged 55-90+, representing a wide range of cancers at different stages of progress and treatment, across four countries (Israel, Canada, Sweden, USA) and using a range of qualitative methods. A subsequent empirical study using narrative methods focused on a more homogenous population of older people aged 74-87, all resident in the same geographical region (NW England), with one of the four most common cancers (breast, colon, prostate and lung) at different stages of progress and treatment, but treated at the same cancer centre. In this study a biographical/narrative method of interviewing was used, in which 20 participants (13 men and 7 women) were invited to tell the „story‟ of their life both before and after cancer. Interpretation of life history data reported by participants in this study suggests that the overriding features of life with cancer for people in their 70s and 80s are hope and hardiness, together forming a kind of resilience which appears to be psychologically protective and which fosters a determination to continue living positively, even at an advanced stage of illness. Whereas this „fourth age‟ has been presented by sociologists as a life stage of inevitable decline, findings from the two studies conducted in this doctoral study indicate a quality of continuing robustness in the lives of some older people which runs counter to common assumptions about their vulnerability and frailty. 2 LIVING WITH CANCER IN OLD AGE: A QUALITATIVE SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND A NARRATIVE INQUIRY Contents Introduction Page 8 Part One ‘Experiencing Cancer’: A Qualitative Systematic Review Chapter 1 Search Strategy and Review Methods Page 15 Chapter 2 Analysis and Interpretation of Findings Page 49 Part Two ‘Cancer Stories’: A Narrative Inquiry Chapter 3 Research design, ethical considerations, sampling Page 68 and recruitment Chapter 4 Data generation and analysis Page 98 Chapter 5 Analysis and interpretation of findings (1): Page 120 First signs or symptoms of cancer and medical Consultations Chapter 6 Analysis and interpretation of findings (2): Page 143 Diagnosis and reaction Chapter 7 Analysis and interpretation of findings (3): Page 156 Treatment Chapter 8 Analysis and interpretation of findings (4): Page 181 Situating self in a life with cancer Chapter 9 Discussion and Conclusions Page 203 Reference List Page 219 3 LIVING WITH CANCER IN OLD AGE: A QUALITATIVE SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND A NARRATIVE INQUIRY Appendix 1 Research Protocol Page 239 Appendix 2 Participant Information Sheet: Long Version Page 253 Appendix 3 Participant Information Sheet: Brief Version Page 257 Appendix 4 Consent Form Page 258 Appendix 5 Link to peer-reviewed publication: Page 260 Hughes, N., S.J.Closs and D.Clark (2009). Experiencing Cancer in Old Age: A Qualitative Systematic Review. Qualitative Health Research, 19 (8): 1139-1153. http://qhr.sagepub.com/content/19/8/1139 4 LIVING WITH CANCER IN OLD AGE: A QUALITATIVE SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND A NARRATIVE INQUIRY List of Tables and Boxes Table 1.1 Provisional bibliographic sample and location source Table 1.2 Summary of analytic techniques applied to extracted findings from research reports Table 1.3 Initial Appraisal Template/Reading Guide Table 1.4 Summary data from provisional bibliographic sample Table 1.5 Cross Comparison of Study Reports by Topic Table 3.1 Cancer Stories: Demographic characteristics Table 3.2 Cancer Stories: Disease Characteristics Table 5.1 First Symptoms and Medical Consultation Table 7.1 Treatments experienced by each participant Box 1.3 Example of search including „filter‟ for qualitative research Box 1.4 Journals searched manually Box 1.5 Decision Rules for Extracting Findings from Qualitative Research Reports for an Integration Study Box 4.1 The developing „SQUIN‟ Box 4.2 Extracts from field texts regarding chosen method of narrative interviewing Box 8.1 Defining attributes of resilience Box 9.1 Extracts from Reflective Research Journal considering the challenge of linking two different studies 5 LIVING WITH CANCER IN OLD AGE: A QUALITATIVE SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND A NARRATIVE INQUIRY Acknowledgements Several organisations and many individuals have supported me in the course of my doctoral research. Macmillan Cancer Support provided substantial funds in the form of a four year part-time Research Fellowship. My employers in the School of Healthcare at the University of Leeds have been generous in allowing modifications to my teaching and administrative commitments. Members of the International Observatory on End of Life Care at Lancaster University welcomed me and housed me as a colleague over several years. At a late stage of my research the Social and Public Health Sciences Unit at the Medical Research Council, University of Glasgow accepted me as a postgraduate research student and provided me with a much-valued additional supervisor. I owe deep and abiding thanks to my first supervisor, Professor David Clark, who has nurtured my skills and sustained my morale over the whole course of my studies. My second supervisor, Professor Kate Hunt, added importantly to my work with her enthusiasm for my project and her detailed, rigorous feedback. Professor José Closs supported me with perceptive and insightful mentorship and with substantial contributions to thinking about, and analysis of, my qualitative systematic review. Professors Julia Addington-Hall and Sheila Payne provided encouragement and feedback at various stages. Dr. Jim Elliott, Dr. Katie Booth and Dr. Ziv Amir at Macmillan Cancer Support provided organisational infrastructure for the conduct of my research, along with all-important funding and an arena for dissemination. Colleagues and fellow doctoral students at Lancaster University supported me in many important ways, listening to my developing ideas and invariably expressing interest in and enthusiasm for my work. I wish to record my gratitude and thanks to: Zoe Cockshott, Dr. Iris Cohen Fineberg, Anthony Greenwood, Tom Lynch, Phil Swarbrick, Dr. Mary Turner, Justin Wood, Dr. Michael Wright. Dr. Maggie Mort, Dr. Anne Grinyer and Dr. Celia Roberts formed my review panel at Lancaster University and gave me invaluable feedback. Special thanks to Dr. Katherine Froggatt for encouraging me back into research activity some years 6 LIVING WITH CANCER IN OLD AGE: A QUALITATIVE SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND A NARRATIVE INQUIRY before beginning my PhD, and for kindly and trenchant critique at significant points. In research presentations and informal discussions, Dr. Chris Bailey, Dr. Jane Hopkinson and Dr. Caroline Nicholson provided role-models of doctoral-level intellectual inquiry. Dr. Janice Brown, Dr. Sue Duke, Dr. Joanna Hok and Dr. Angie Rogers stimulated my thinking about narrative methods. Dr. Michelle Briggs introduced me to the concept and practice of qualitative metasynthesis and Dr. Liz McDermott furthered my learning about this method of systematic review. Dr. Carrie Birch has maintained a strong interest in my work, while conducting her own intensive research. Dr. Janet Hirst provided invaluable support for creating an „effective writing environment‟ during crucial late stages of finishing my thesis. Many clinicians and staff at the research site for my empirical study provided support and facilitated recruitment of patients, including: Dr. Wiebke Appel, Diane Evans, Dr. Andy Hindley, Dr. Shabbir Susnerwala and Dr. Elaine Young. Dr. Angie Parker provided invaluable guidance in gaining ethical and research governance approval. I wish to record very special thanks to all the men and women who agreed to participate in my empirical research and to tell me their „cancer stories‟. I dedicate this work to them and to their families, to my own extended family and, more particularly, to my wife Kate Fleming and our children, Róisín Hughes and Séan Hughes. 7 LIVING WITH CANCER IN OLD AGE: A QUALITATIVE SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND A NARRATIVE INQUIRY Author’s Declaration I declare that, except where explicit reference is made to the contribution of others, this thesis is the result of my own work and has not been submitted for any other degree at the University of Glasgow or any other institution. Signature: Printed name: Nicolas David Hughes 8 LIVING WITH CANCER IN OLD AGE: A QUALITATIVE SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND A NARRATIVE INQUIRY INTRODUCTION This thesis reports the methods and findings of a research inquiry which investigated older people‟s experiences of living with cancer. In this Introduction I set out the background to two studies which I conducted to answer the overarching research question: „What are the subjective experiences of older people of living with cancer?‟ I explain the research problem and the aim of my studies and indicate the research questions which guided my inquiry. I make some observations on the nature of cancer in older age and on specific features of ageing in modern society. I close the Introduction with a chapter-by-chapter summary of the structure and contents of the thesis. Research Problem Despite increasing longevity and generally improving health in Western populations the process of ageing is associated with greater incidence of disease and illness, in particular of degenerative conditions such as musculo-skeletal disorders, ischaemic heart disease, neurological impairments and cancers. Comorbidity is common in individuals aged 70 and older (Stevenson et al 2004; Extermann 2000) and cancer has its highest incidence in older populations. There is extensive literature reporting the incidence and prevalence of cancers in older age groups along with approaches to treatment and the effects and management of comorbidity (Bennahum et al 1997, Extermann et al 1998, Satariano & Silliman 2003). However, the subjective perceptions of older individuals undergoing the experience of cancer remain largely unknown. Aim of the research Approximately half of all cancers diagnosed in the United Kingdom are in people aged 70 or older (NCIN, 2008). The aim of my research inquiry was to investigate the experiences of older people of living with cancer. My specific focus of interest was the experience of people aged 75 and older, since this appears to be a hidden population whose experiences are largely unknown. Individuals 9