LIVING WORKING AND SPACE IN A NASA HISTORY OF SKYLAB W. David Compton Charles D. Benson Introduction to the Dover Edition by Paul Dickson Dover Publications, Inc. Mineola, New York NASA maintains an internal history program for two principal reasons. (1) Publication of official histories is one way in which NASA responds to the provision of the National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958 that requires NASA to “provide for the widest practicable and appropriate dissemination of information concerning its activities and the results thereof.” (2) Thoughtful study of NASA history can help managers accomplish the missions assigned to the agency. Understanding NASA’s past aids in understanding its present situation and illuminates possible future directions. One advantage of working on contemporary history is access to participants. During the research phase, the authors conducted numerous interviews. Subsequently they submitted parts of the manuscript to persons who had participated in or closely observed the events described. Readers were asked to point out errors of fact and questionable interpretations and to provide supporting evidence. The authors then made such changes as they believed justified. The opinions and conclusions set forth in this book are those of the authors; no official of the agency necessarily endorses those opinions or conclusions. Copyright Introduction copyright © 2011 by Paul Dickson All rights reserved. Bibliographical Note This Dover edition, first published in 2011, is a slightly altered republication of the work originally published in NASA History Series (NASA SP—4208), Washington D.C., in 1983. The color photos originally on pages 355–360 are now in black and white within the book, and have been reproduced in color on the inside covers. The color artwork and information originally on the inside covers has been moved to page xiv and has been reproduced in black and white. A new Introduction by Paul Dickson has been added to this edition. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Compton, William David, 1927– Living and working in space: a NASA history of skylab W. David Compton, Charles D. Benson. — Dover ed. introduction to the Dover edition by Paul Dickson. p. cm. Originally published: Washington, D.C.: Scientific and Technical Information Branch, National Aeronautics and Space Administration: For sale by the Supt. of Docs., U.S. G.P.O., 1983; in series: NASA History Series; and NASA SP; 4208. With new introd. Summary: “The official record of America’s first space station, this book from the NASA History Series chronicles the Skylab program from its planning during the 1960s through its 1973 launch and its conclusion in 1979. It presents definitive accounts of the project’s goals and achievements as well as its use of discoveries and technology developed during the Apollo program. 1983 edition” — Provided by publisher. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 13: 978-0-486-48218-7 (pbk.) ISBN 10: 0-486-48218-9 (pbk.) 1. Skylab Program. I. Benson, Charles D. II. Title. TL789.8.U6S5546 2011 629.44'2—dc22 2011006734 Manufactured in the United States by Courier Corporation 48218901 www.doverpublications.com Contents INTRODUCTION TO THE DOVER EDITION PREFACE PART I. FROM CONCEPT THROUGH DECISION, 1962–1969 1. WHAT TO DO FOR AN ENCORE: POST-APOLLO PLANS Directions for Manned Spaceflight Space Stations after 1962 Sizing Up a Space Station Air Force Seeks Role in Space President Calls for NASA’s Plans Mueller Opens Apollo Applications Program Office 2. FROM SPENT STAGE TO ORBITAL CLUSTER, 1965–1966 Early Proposals to Use Spent Stages Marshall Sponsors the Spent Stage Concept to Design: Bounding the Problem Concept to Design: Defining the Workshop The Cluster Concept 3. APOLLO APPLICATIONS: “WEDNESDAY’S CHILD,” Initial Plans and Budgets Seeking New Justification AAP vs. MOL Center Roles and Missions Presidential Approval 4. A SCIENCE PROGRAM FOR MANNED SPACEFLIGHT Science in Space to 1965 Organizing for Manned Space Science Scientists and Man in Space Solar Observatories in Orbit Experiments for the Workshop More Advice from the Scientific Community 5. YEARS OF UNCERTAINTY, 1967–1969 Impact of the Fire Problems with the Cluster Missions AAP under Internal Attack Shrinking Budgets and Shrinking Program The Wet Workshop Goes Dry Retrospect and Prospect PART II. DEVELOPMENT AND PREPARATIONS TO FLY, 1969–1973 6. MANAGING THE DESIGN PHASE Moving Out of Apollo’s Shadow A Second Skylab Management Tools The Problem of Changes The Problem of Reentry 7. LIVING AND WORKING IN SPACE Habitability of Early Spacecraft Habitability of the Wet Workshop Contribution of Industrial Designers Habitability of the Dry Workshop The Food System Marshall Calls for a Reassessment 8. THE MEDICAL EXPERIMENTS Defining the Experiments A Space Toilet Building the Medical Hardware A Simulation and What Came of It 9. STUDYING THE SUN Solar Instruments Apollo Telescope Mount Mission Plans and Operating Procedures Technical Progress and Problems 10. LATE ADDITIONS TO THE EXPERIMENTS Observing the Earth Earth-Resource Experiments Selecting the Investigators Flight Planning and Instrument Development Student Experiments 11. PUTTING THE PIECES TOGETHER More Work for Contractors Test Program Module Development: Airlock and Docking Adapter Trainers and Mockups Module Development: The Workshop Reentry Reexamined 12. PREPARATIONS FOR FLIGHT Defining Center Responsibilities Operations Planning in Houston Huntsville Organizes for Mission Support Test Pilot vs. Scientist-Astronaut Crew Training 13. LAUNCHING SKYLAB Selecting the Launch Complex The Milkstool Preparing a Launch Plan Facility Modifications Handling the Experiments Relations with Huntsville Problems of New Hardware From Certification Review to Liftoff PART III. THE MISSIONS AND RESULTS, 1973–1979 14. SAVING SKYLAB The Accident Maneuvering for Minimum Heat, Maximum Power Assessing the Heat’s Effect Devising a Sunshade Plans to Increase Skylab’s Power Launch and Docking Accomplishing the Repair Investigation Board 15. THE FIRST MISSION Private Communications Physical Fitness in Space Flight Planning: The Astronauts’ View Fight Planning: The Investigators’ View The Long-Awaited Solar Flare Critique of the First Mission 16. THE SECOND MISSION Motion Sickness A Rescue Mission? Deploying the Twin-Pole Sunshade Solar Viewing Earth-Resource and Corollary Experiments More Mechanical Problems A Routine Day in Space A Team of Overachievers 17. THE LAST MISSION Changes to the Mission An Error in Judgment Activation Getting to Work First Month’s Accomplishments A Comet for Christmas Carr Calls for an Assessment Around the World for 84 Days Coming Back 18. RESULTS Medical Findings Solar Observations Earth Observations NASA’s Own Experiments Comet Observations and Student Experiments Skylab Science: An Assessment 19. WHAT GOES UP … Plans to Save the Workshop Regaining Control of Skylab Last days of Skylab APPENDIXES A. Summary of the Missions B. Major Contractors C. International Aeronautical Federation World Records Set by Skylab D. Experiments E. Astronauts’ Biographies F. Comet Kohoutek G. Joint Observing Program 2, Active Regions SOURCE NOTES INDEX THE AUTHORS INTRODUCTION TO THE DOVER EDITION Mention the word Skylab to people of a certain age and their eyes will most likely look skyward for a fraction of a second. This is because during the spring and early summer of 1979 the abandoned U.S. space station was drifting from its decaying orbit and was heading back to earth. The cry went up: “Skylab is falling! Skylab is falling!” On March 28, the Three Mile Island nuclear reactor near Harrisburg, Pennsylvania had a partial melt down. Coming two weeks after the release of the nuclear disaster film, The China Syndrome, the dream of nuclear power as a peaceful, environmentally sound option was over. Then Skylab crowded Three Mile Island out of the headlines. People were initially afraid there would be death and destruction. Technology suddenly seemed demonic. On July 11, over six years after it went into orbit, Skylab fell to earth, breaking up in the atmosphere and scattering its remains across the Indian Ocean and the Australian outback. While there was no damage to life or property, there was more than a little damage to NASA’s reputation, which in its post-lunar landing phase was, as Time magazine later put it, “starting to look as adrift as Skylab itself.” Nine days after the fall of Skylab the world celebrated the tenth anniversary of the Apollo 11 moon landing, suggesting backward rather than forward movement. If there was anyone rejoicing, it was a seventeen-year-old beer truck driver who found some charred Skylab fragments in his backyard. He bagged them up, grabbed the next flight to California, and claimed the $10,000 prize, which a San Francisco newspaper had offered to the first person to bring a piece of Skylab to its office. To this day there are many whose only recollection of Skylab was the fiery return of the largest machine man had put into space. This is unfortunate because the real story of Skylab is more complicated, heroic, and successful than that. For starters, America’s first space station was something of a makeshift thing. It was retrofitted from the enormous, nine-story tall, third stage of a Saturn V booster, which would no longer be needed to send men to the moon after the cancellation of the Apollo program. Skylab also picked up practical
Description: