Live donor nephrectomy and return to work - RePub - Erasmus

111 Pages·2005·1.06 MB·English

Laparoscopic versus open living
donor nephrectomy
M.Y. Smits-Lind
This thesis was fi nancially supported by:
Nierstichting Nederland
Johnson & Johnson Medical B.V.
Fujisawa Holland B.V.
Roche Nederland B.V.
Tyco Healthcare Nederland B.V.
Novartis Pharma B.V.
Olympus Nederland B.V.
B. Braun Medical B.V.
Laparoscopic versus open living donor nephrectomy.
Thesis, Erasmus University Rotterdam
© M.Y. Smits-Lind
All rights reserved. No part of this thesis ma y be reproduced, stored in a retrieval of any nature,
or transmitted in any form by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or
otherwise, without the permission of the author.
Cover: The Kiss by Gustav Klimt.
With permission of the Oesterreichische Galerie Belvedere Vienna.
Printed by Optima Grafi sche Communicatie, Rotterdam
Laparoscopic Versus Open Living Donor Nephrectomy
Laparoscopische versus open nier donatie bij leven
Proefschrift
ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de
Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
op gezag van de rector magnifi cus
Prof.dr. S.W.J. Lamberts
en volgens besluit van het College voor Promoties.
De openbare verdediging zal plaatsvinden op
woensdag 12 oktober 2005 om 15.45 uur
door
May Yvonne Smits-Lin d
geboren te ’s Gravenha ge
PROMOTIECOMMISSIE
Promotor: Prof.dr. J.N.M. IJzermans
Overige leden: Prof.dr. W. Weimar
Prof.dr. J. Klein
Prof.dr. R. Benner
Copromotor: Dr. I.P.J. Alwayn
CONTENTS
Chapter 1 Introduction 9
Adapted from: BJU Int. 2002; 89(2):162-168 .
Chapter 2 Right-sided laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Is re luctance sti ll 25
justifi ed?
Transplantation 2002; 74(7): 1045-1048.
Chapter 3 Body image a fter laparoscopic or open donor nephrectom y 33
Surg Endosc. 2004; 18(8): 1276-1279 .
Chapter 4 Live donor nephrectomy and return to work. Does the operative 41
technique matter?
Surg Endosc. 2003; 17(4): 591-595.
Chapter 5 The eff ect of laparoscopic and open donor nephrectomy on the long 51
term renal function in donor and recipient: A retrospective stud y
Transplantation 2005; in press.
Chapter 6 Eff ect of prolonged warm ischemia and pneumoperitoneum on renal 61
function in a rat syngeneic kidney transplantation model
Surg Endosc. 2005; in press.
Chapter 7 Laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectom y: Ureteral complications 73
in recipients
Urology 2004; 63(1): 36-39.
Chapter 8 A randomized, blinded, study comparing laparoscopic and minimal 83
invasive open donor nephrectomy: The short term result s
Chapter 9 General discussion and conclusions 95
Discussie en conc lusies 101
Dankwoord 107
Curriculum Vitae 111
To my mother, thank you for your unconditional love .
To Loet, thank you for being a part of our lives .
To Jeroen, thank you for your love, friendship and support.
Chapter
1
Introduction
Adapted from:
M.Y. Lind, J.N.M. IJzermans, H.J. Bonjer.
Department of Surgery
Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam
Open versus laparoscopic donor
nephrectomy in renal transplantation.
BJU Int. 2002;89(2):162-168.