306 Research Article + Light-activation of the Archaerhodopsin H -pump reverses age-dependent loss of vertebrate regeneration: sparking system-level controls in vivo Dany Spencer Adams*, Ai-Sun Tseng*,` and Michael Levin§ DepartmentofBiologyandTuftsCenterforRegenerativeandDevelopmentalBiology,TuftsUniversity,200BostonAvenue,Suite4600,Medford,MA 02155,USA *Theseauthorscontributedequallytothiswork `Presentaddress:SchoolofLifeSciences,UniversityofNevada,LasVegas,4505MarylandParkway,LasVegas,NV89154-4004,USA §Authorforcorrespondence([email protected]) BiologyOpen2,306–313 doi:10.1242/bio.20133665 Received20thNovember2012 Accepted28thNovember2012 Summary Optogenetics,theregulationofproteinsbylight,hasrevolutionized endogenous regenerative pathways. Electroneutral pH change, the study of excitable cells, and generated strong interest in the inducedbyexpressionofthesodiumprotonexchanger,NHE3,did therapeutic potential of this technology for regulating action notrescueregeneration,implicatingthehyperpolarizingactivityof potentials in neural and muscle cells. However, it is currently Archaerhodopsin as the causal factor. The data reveal that unknown whether light-activated channels andpumps will allow hyperpolarizationisrequiredonlyduringthefirst48hourspost- control of restingpotential inembryonic or regenerating cells in injury,andthatexpressioninthespinalcordisnotnecessaryfor vivo.Abnormalitiesinioncurrentsofnon-excitablecellsareknown theeffecttooccur.Ourstudyshowsthatcomplex,coordinatedsets n e to play key roles in the etiology of birth defects and cancer. ofstablebioelectriceventsthatalterbodypatterning—prevention p O Moreover, changes in transmembrane resting potential initiate ofbirthdefectsandinductionofregeneration—canbeelicitedby Xenopus tadpole tail regeneration, including regrowth of a thetemporalmodulationofasingleioncurrent.Furthermore,as y g functioning spinal cord, in tails that have been inhibited by optogeneticreagentscanbeusedtoachievethatmanipulation,the o ol natural inactivity of the endogenous H+-V-ATPase pump. potential for this technology to impact clinical approaches for Bi However, existing pharmacological and genetic methods allow preventive, therapeutic, and regenerative medicine is neithernon-invasivecontrolofbioelectricparametersinvivonor extraordinary. We expect this first critical step will lead to an theabilitytoabrogatesignalingatdefinedtimepoints.Here,we unprecedented expansion of optogenetics in biomedical research showthatlightactivationofaH+-pumpcanpreventdevelopmental and in the probing of novel and fundamental biophysical defects and induce regeneration by hyperpolarizing determinantsofgrowthandform. transmembrane potentials. Specifically, light-dependent, Archaerhodopsin-based, H+-flux hyperpolarized cells in vivo and (cid:2)2013.PublishedbyTheCompanyofBiologistsLtd.Thisis thus rescued Xenopus embryos from the craniofacial and an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the patterning abnormalities caused by molecular blockade of CreativeCommonsAttributionNon-CommercialShareAlike endogenous H+-flux. Furthermore, light stimulation of Arch for License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0). only 2 days after amputation restored regenerative capacity to inhibited tails, inducing cell proliferation, tissue innervation, and Keywords: Bioelectricity, Optogenetics, Regeneration, Tail, upregulationofnotch1andmsx1,essentialgenesintwowell-known Transmembrane voltage, Xenopus Introduction can be facilitated by the flexibility of spatio-temporal control The use of light-activated ion-transporting proteins to alter provided by optogenetics. Especially interesting is the potential transmembrane voltage is an important part of the field of applicability of this technology to regenerative medicine, where optogenetics and has led to remarkable breakthroughs in our bioelectrical signals have been shown to initiate regeneration of abilityto elicit and inhibit action potentials in nerve and muscle complex, multi-tissue organs and appendages (Adams et al., cells (Kno¨pfel et al., 2010). However, it is unknown whether 2007;Beaneetal.,2011;Levin,2012;Paietal.,2012;Tsenget these tools are adaptable for use in developing or otherwise al., 2010). dynamic systems, especially during complex patterning and A powerful model for studying regeneration of complex disease events (Levin, 2012). This is a critical issue as vertebratestructuresistheXenopustadpoletail,whichcomprises endogenous bioelectrical signals are known to regulate cellular spinal cord, notochord, muscle, nerves, vasculature, and skin. processes including proliferation, differentiation, migration, and Aftertailamputation,thetailstumpbecomeshighlydepolarized. morphology (Levin, 2009). Thus biomedical applications that A bioelectrical hyperpolarizingsignal is then required to initiate harnesstheseprocessesbymanipulatingrestingpotentialinvivo regeneration and is one of the earliest signals identified in this Optogenetic regeneration 307 process(Adamsetal.,2007).Startingat6 hourspost-amputation (hpa),theprotonpumpH+-V-ATPaseisstronglyexpressedinthe plasmamembraneoftheregenerationbudcellsattheinjurysite. The H+-V-ATPase-dependent H+-efflux acts to repolarize the regeneration bud and this event is required to initiate proliferation, directed innervation, and induction of regenerative signaling pathways, leading to successful replacement of the missing tail (Tseng and Levin, 2012). Conversely, molecularly or chemically inhibiting H+-V-ATPase activity blocks regeneration. Interestingly, Xenopus tadpoles exhibit age-dependent changes in regenerative ability similar to humans (Beck et al., 2003). The absence of endogenous H+- effluxandtheunrelieveddepolarizationofthetailstumpinhibits regeneration during this age-specific physiological non- regenerative (also known as the ‘‘refractory’’) period of development (Adams et al., 2007). We explored the ability of optogenetics to address two important unknowns. First, can a minimally invasive method be developedforprecisecontrolofbioelectricstatesofcellsoutside of the neuromuscular system in vivo? Second, because pharmacological reagents cannot be reliably washed out of 3- dimensional tissues, itis difficulttoput a temporal boundary on Fig.1. PhenotypescausedbyinhibitionoftheH+-V-ATPase.(A)Dorsal the activity of membrane voltage in regenerative pathways. viewofnormalstage47tadpole.Whitearrowsindicatenormaleyes,olfactory bulbsandbranchialarches.(B–D)Craniofacialphenotypescommonlyseen Given the ability of light-gated ion pumps to be regulated afterinjectionattheone-cellstagewithmRNAencodingYCHE78,adominant temporally, we hypothesized that using such a tool in negativeH+-V-ATPasesubunit.Bshowsabnormallysmallbranchialarches; regenerating cells could allow us to control the external thearrowinCpointstoectopicpigmentsintheopticnerve;thearrowsinD n manipulation of V at precisely defined time points. As this pointtoamissingeyeandanabnormalolfactorybulb.ScalebarinC(forCand e mem p approach has not yet been experimentally investigated, a D)50.5mm.(E)Profileofanormalstage42embryo.Arrowsforcomparison O withF.(F)Stereotypicalswellingscausedbyincubationoftadpolesin10nM successful result would: represent an important additional use y concanamycinfor24hoursfollowingtailamputationatstage40.Evenif g for optogenetic methods, identify novel schemes for clinical removedfromconcanamycinatthisstage,alltadpolessubsequentlydie. o therapies, and reveal new aspects of the mechanisms of Anterioristotheleftanddorsalisup.(G)Aregeneratedtailshown ol bioelectrical regulation during development and regeneration. approximately8dayspost-amputation.Theamputationplanewasjustanterior Bi to(totheleftof)theleftmostwhitearrow.(H)Anon-regeneratingtail.After To test the ability of a light-gated ion translocator to alter amputationatstage47,thistaildidnotgrowback,acharacteristicoftailscutat endogenous voltage and thereby induce regeneration in non- thisagethatdefinestherefractorystage.Theredarrowpointstothearea regenerative tadpole tails, and to further probe the temporal referredtoastheregenerationbud;theamputationplaneisimmediately requirements of ion flows during regeneration, we employed anterior.Exceptwherenoted,scalebars51mm. Archaerhodopsin (Arch), a light-activated, hyperpolarizing H+- pump (Chow et al., 2010) to manipulate H+-flux-dependent chemicalH+-V-ATPaseinhibitor,atanearlytadpolestagecauses initiationofregeneration.Here,weshowthatArchactsinalight- edemas in the headand trunk andsubsequent lethality (compare dependent manner in larval Xenopus tissues in vivo to Fig. 1E,F). H+-V-ATPase function is also required for initiating hyperpolarize cells, and thus can functionally replace the tadpole tail regeneration. During the refractory period, the endogenous V-type proton pump. Light-activated Arch, absence of endogenous H+-V-ATPase activity after tadpole tail functioning outside of the spinal cord, rescues both amputationpreventsregenerativeregrowth(compareFig. 1G,H). developmental and regenerative defects caused by age- Together, these observed phenotypes demonstrate essential dependent (endogenous) or experimental inhibition of normal requirements for stable H+ efflux in normal craniofacial H+-efflux,anditactsthroughNotchandMSX1.Light-activation development, osmotic balance, and tail regeneration. for only 48 hours post-injury, followed by continuous darkness, The multiple roles of H+ efflux during development and is sufficient to initiate the entire program of regeneration of this regenerationsuggestthatthisioncurrentshouldbeanimportant complex neuromuscular appendageat agesthat otherwisewould target for therapeutic manipulation of tissues. We therefore not regenerate. sought to identify optogenetic tools that induce stable, controllable H+ efflux in vivo and to use an optogenetic Results approach to prevent developmental defects, correct ion Absence ofH+efflux induces developmentaland regenerative imbalance, and initiate the restoration of a complex appendage, defects the tail. During Xenopus development, inhibition of H+-V-ATPase function, molecularly or chemically, leads to both embryonic The light-activatedprotonpump,Arch, isactive inXenopus and regenerative defects (Fig. 1). Injection of mRNA encoding cells YCHE78,adominantnegativeH+-V-ATPasesubunit,attheone The Archaerhodopsin-3 (Arch) protein is a light-gated proton cell stage results in craniofacial malformations including small pump (Chow et al., 2010) that is active when expressed in branchial arches, and irregular eye, ear and olfactory bulb neurons. To determine whether Arch is functional in Xenopus structure,(Fig. 1A–D).Treatmentwithconcanamycin,aspecific embryonic cells, we first examined Arch expression. After Optogenetic regeneration 308 injection of the Arch mRNA into early embryos, a linked fluorescent tag (GFP or Tomato) was imaged. Both epifluorescence and spinning disk confocal microscopy consistently detected strong Arch protein on cell surfaces from approximately the 32-cell (Fig. 2A) through tadpole stages (Fig. 2B,C), indicating that it is expressed as predicted. Toverifythelight-dependentactivityofArchinXenopuscells, we measured resting membrane voltage and intracellular pH in vivo. Impaling early embryonic cells showed the expected hyperpolarization of Arch-expressing light-stimulated cells (Arch+Light) relative to Arch-expressing, unstimulated cells maintained in the dark (Arch+Dark; 24067 mV versus 22268 mV; n512, t53.541, P50.002) (Fig. 2D). To establish whether Arch-Tomato could pump H+ ions out of cells, we measuredintracellularpHunderconditionswhenArchwaseither inactive or active. BCECF is a fluorescent pH reporter whose excitationwavelengthsdonotstronglystimulateArch(Fig. 2E). UsingBCECF,wefoundthatthedifferencebetweenpHofcells expressingArch-Tomatoandthosethatarenotexpressingitwas 0.360.2 pHunitsonaverage(Fig. 2F,G,H).UsingSNARF-5F,a fluorescentpHreporterwhoseexcitationwavelengthsmaximally stimulate Arch and for which the irradiance of the illumination sourceusedwashigherthanthoseusedforBCECF,wefoundan averagedifferenceof0.760.3 pHunits(Fig. 2I,J,K).Thesedata confirmthatArchisactivatedbylighttopumpH+ionsoutofthe minimally differentiated cells in the regeneration bud. Together, n the V measurements and the pH results establish that Arch e mem p functions in a light-dependent manner as a proton pump to O increase polarization in Xenopus cells in vivo. y g o Light-inducedArchactivity rescuesdevelopmental defects ol Bi OurexperimentalevidencesuggeststhatArchactivityshouldbeable tosubstituteforthefunctionofH+-V-ATPase,theendogenousproton pump, during development. To test whether light-illuminated Arch Fig.2. ArchisexpressedandcanbeactivatedinXenopuscells. couldinfactactasagainoffunctiontooltorescuedeficienciesinH+- (A–C)ExpressionofArch-GFPatthestagesindicated.mRNAforArch-GFPwas fluxregulation,wefirstexaminedtheabilityofactiveArchtoprevent injectedattheonecellstageandlastsforatleastthe8daysrequiredforthelongest embryonic defects caused by molecular inhibition of H+-flux. As experiments.(A)ViewofanimalpoleofaStage7embryo,thestageatwhich electrophysiologywasperformed.Arch-GFPexpressionisespeciallyvisibleatcell– shown in Fig.1, expression of YCHE78 blocks endogenous H+-V- cellboundaries(e.g.whitecircle)wherethecellshavelesspigment.(B)Arch-GFPis ATPase function resulting in patterning and craniofacial stillpresentinthemembranesofhexagonally-packedectodermalcellsatstage30, abnormalities(Vandenbergetal.,2011).Consistentwithrestoration wellafterthedevelopmentalstagesthatarerelevantforcraniofacialdevelopment. ofH+effluxbylight-activatedArch,raisingembryosexpressingboth (C)Arch-GFPisstillstronglyexpressedatstage47,therefractorystage,during which,ifthetailiscut,itdoesnotgrowbackduetoendogenousinhibition.Theblack YCHE78 and Arch under light prevented those developmental arborizedcellsaremelanophores,thelongeralignedcellsaremusclecells,andthe defects,aswellaslethality,ascomparedtosiblingembryosraisedin hexagonallyarrayedcellsareepidermis.(D)Restingpotential(V )ofimpaled mem thedark,(n5149,Z53.423,P,0.001).Similarly,edemasinducedby cellsinembryosatstage7.Arch-tomatowasinjectedat1cell,thenhalfofthese concanamycin treatment at the tadpole stage (Fig.1F) were also embryosandhalfoftheuninjected(NT5notreatment)controlswereplacedunder bluelightwhiletheotherhalveswerekeptinthedarkuntilstage7.TheV of suppressed by concurrent Arch activation via light treatment. Thus mem untreatedembryoswasabout22962mVandwasunaffectedbylight.Arch- Arch activity functionally replaced the normal H+ efflux during injectedembryoskeptinthedarkweredepolarizedwhileArch-injectedembryos development and suppressed embryonic defects and physiologic keptinthelightwerehyperpolarized.(E)ExplanationofpHmeasuringexperimental imbalance. protocol.TwodyeswereusedtocomparepHofArch-tomatoexpressingcellswith pHofcellsshowingnoexpression.BCECFisexcitedby450and500nmlight, whichdoesnotactivateArchverystrongly,whileSNARF-5Fisexcitedby540nm, Light-inducedArchactivity initiatesregeneration whichmaximallyactivatesArch.ThepredictionisthatthepHsmeasuredbyBCECF HavingdemonstratedthatArchfunctionsinnon-excitableembryonic willdifferbylessthanthepHsmeasuredbySNARFbecauseArchshouldbe tissuestosuppressdefectscausedbymolecularinhibitionofH+-V- maximallyactivatedunderthelatterconditions,thuscausingpHtoincreaseinArch ATPase, we sought to test the therapeutic potential of using this expressingcells.(F–K)ResultsofpHmeasurementsusingtwodyes.(F,I) Brightfieldimagesshowingpositionsofregenerationbuds.(G,J)ImagesofArch- approach to induce vertebrate regenerative repair. During the tomatofluorescenceusedtochooseregionsofinterest(ROIs)definedbyhighand refractory period, tadpoles exhibit human-like age-dependent lowtomatofluorescence.(H,K)ROIsfromGandJweretransferredtotheratio regenerative ability: tail regeneration is endogenously blocked imagesgeneratedbythedyes(seeMaterialsandMethods).Aspredicted, duringonephaseoftadpoledevelopment,justasdigitregeneration measurementsmadeunderlowArch-activationconditions(BCECF,F–H)show onlya0.360.2pHunitdifferencebetweenArch-tomatoexpressingandnon- isendogenouslyblockedinchildrenovertheageofseven(Douglas, expressingcells.Incontrast,underArch-activatingconditions(SNARF-5F,I–K),the 1972; Illingworth, 1974; Illingworth and Barker, 1980). To test pHdifferenceisapproximatelydoubledto0.760.3pHunits.Anterioristotheleftin whetherArchactivitycouldreversethisnaturalinhibition,weasked allimagesexceptA.Scalebars5100mm. Optogenetic regeneration 309 whether light-activated Arch H+ pump activity can initiate Table S1). Moreover, in contrast to previous results showing regenerationduringtherefractoryperiod. thatconstitutiveH+-effluxbothbeforeandafteramputationcould Arch-Tomato mRNA was injected into earlyembryos and the lead to refractory regeneration, here we initiated hyperpolariza- embryos were allowed to develop in darkness. During the tion only after amputation, a more relevant model for clinical refractory period, tadpole tails were amputated and immediately applications, and for only 2 days. Importantly, after 2 days of placedeitherunderlightorinthedarkfor2daysandthenfurther light exposure, Arch activity did not cause any side effects such grown in the dark for 5 additional days. We found that the age- as tissue abnormalities. specific refractory inhibition of regeneration was reversed in To better characterize the role of Arch activity in the light- light-stimulatedArch-expressingtadpolesbutnotinunstimulated induced refractory regeneration, we examined the spatial Arch-expressing tadpoles, with light approximately doubling distribution of Arch expression in regenerated and non- regenerative ability (n516 groups representing 428 tadpoles regenerated tails. Concentrated Arch expression (as evidenced total, t53.709, P50.002) (Fig. 3A; supplementary material bythepresenceofTomatofluorescence)wasseenatthedistaltip of all of the successful tail regenerates after light stimulation (Fig. 3B,C). Non-regenerated tail stumps, in contrast, showed randomizedregionsofArchexpression.Similarly,nocorrelation betweenArchlocalizationandregenerativesuccesswasobserved in tails of tadpoles expressing Arch but grown in the dark (Fig. 3D). Forsuccessfulregenerationtooccur,propernervepatterningis essential, so we examined whether Arch expression correlated with the position of neurons. Surprisingly, expression of Arch- Tomato in the spinal cord was not required for full regeneration (Fig. 3E,F). Consistent with this observation, amputated tail stumps that contained strong Arch-Tomato expression in the neural tissue, but lacked strong distal expression, failed to n regenerate after light activation (Fig. 3G,H). Our data establish e that temporally inducing H+ efflux via Arch activation after p O refractory tail amputation is sufficient to initiate regeneration y during this endogenous non-regenerative state. Furthermore, g Archactivityisnotrequiredintheneuralcellsoftheamputated o ol tail stump, but rather in a small distal population. Bi Fig.3. Arch-Tomatoactivitypromotesregenerativerepair. (A)Comparisonofregenerationindices,ameasureofregenerationsuccess,of thetailsofArch-Tomatoexpressingtadpolesamputatedattherefractorystage. Significantlybetterregenerationwasfoundintadpolesthatwereexposedto Arch-activatinglightfor48hoursfollowingamputationrelativetothosekept inthedark(t-test).(B)ComparisonoflocalizationofArch-Tomatointadpoles exposedtodarkversuslightfor48hourspost-amputation.UnderArch- activatinglight,regenerationcorrelatedperfectlywiththepresenceofagroup ofArch-Tomatoexpressingcellsattheverytipoftheregeneratingtail(seeC below).Incontrast,amongthetadpoleskeptinthedark,regenerationsuccess didnotcorrelateatallwithlocalizationofArch-tomato.Thedistributionsare highlysignificantlydifferent(x2).(C)Arch-Tomatolocalizationina regeneratedtail8daysafteramputationatthenon-regenerativestage47.Arch- Tomatoexpressionisstillstrongintheuncutpartofthetailtotheleft,andina smallclumpofcellsatthedistalmosttipoftheregeneratingtail(whitearrow). Otherwise,asexpected,thereisverylowifanyexpressionofArch-tomatoin theregenerate.Scalebar5100mm.(D)Arch-Tomatoexpressioninatailthat didnotregenerate.Whilethereisexpressionallthewaytothedistaledgeofthe amputationplane,expressionisrelativelyeven,thatis,thereisnogroupof particularlybrightcells.ScalebarasinC.(E–H)Highermagnification brightfieldandfluorescenceviewsoflight-stimulatedtailsandArch-Tomato expression.YellowNsindicatethenotochords.WhiteSCsandsmall arrowheadsindicatethespinalcord.Letterswerepositionedonthebrightfield imagesthentransferredtothefluorescenceimages.Atthedistalends(tothe right)largerarrowheadsindicatetheposteriorextentsofthenotochord(yellow) andspinalcord(white).Scalebars525mm.(E,F)Brightfieldandfluorescence imagesofaregeneratedtailshowingthebrightcellstobefurtherdistal,and largelyventral,tothespinalcord.Thebrightcellsareindicatedbyawhite arrowinF.(G,H)ArefractorytailthatdidnotregenerateshowingArch-tomato expressingneuraltissueextendingtothedistaltipofthenon-regeneratingbud. Forallimages,anterioristotheleftanddorsalisup. Optogenetic regeneration 310 pHchangealone isnot sufficientto restoreregeneration (Praetoriusetal.,2000;Sabirovetal.,1999).Incubationofthese SinceArchfunctionmodulatesboth,V andpH,wesoughtto embryosinculturemediumcontaininghigh[Na+]thatfacilitates mem determine which of these physiological properties was causal in H+-efflux through this antiport should, like Arch activity, raise initiatingregeneration.Previousdataalreadyshowedthatcellular internal pH but unlike Arch activity, should not affect V . In mem hyperpolarization(usingachloridetransporter,independently of the tail regeneration rescue assays performed during the non- proton flux) is sufficient to induce regeneration (Tseng and regenerativerefractoryperiod,comparisonsofNHE3-expressing Levin, 2012). Thus, we asked whether pH change alone would tadpolesinhigh[Na+]mediumtothoseinnormalmediumorto improve regenerative response. To alter pH without changing uninjected controls in either high [Na+] or normal medium gave V , embryos were injected with mRNA encoding no evidence of improved regenerative ability (total n5255, mem constitutively active NHE3, an electroneutral Na+/H+ exchanger Kruskal–Wallis plusDunn’s Q, P.0.5 for allcomparisons). We interprettheseresultstobeinconsistentwithamodelinwhichan increase in pH is sufficient to induce refractory regeneration. Together with the evidence that shows V change alone is mem sufficient to rescue refractory regeneration (Tseng and Levin, 2012), we conclude that it is principally the effect of light- stimulated Arch on V , not on pH, that initiates regeneration. mem Stimulation of Arch-dependentH+-efflux restores regeneration bytriggering endogenousdownstream geneticmechanisms Because Arch activity restored refractory regeneration, we examined the potential downstream mechanisms by which this process was carried out. Notch1 and Msx1 are two well- characterizedbiochemicalsignalingcomponentsthatarerequired to drive regenerative outgrowth and patterning (Beck et al., 2003).WeaskedwhetherArchpromotedtailregrowthbyacting through these known downstream regenerative pathways. In situ n e hybridization revealed that light stimulation of Arch induced p upregulation of both Notch1 and Msx1 (Coffman et al., 1990; O Feledy et al., 1999) (Fig. 4A,B as compared to Fig. 4C,D). We y g alsoexaminedtheeffectofArchstimulationoncellproliferation o and nerve patterning, two processes that are required for ol Bi regeneration. Light-dependent Arch activation more than doubled the number of mitotic cells in the tail regeneration bud region (n522, t55.273, P,0.001) (Fig. 4E) and promoted proper nerve patterning (compare Fig. 4F,G to Fig. 4H,I). Together, these results show that Arch-induced H+ efflux initiates regenerative tail growth through endogenous mechanisms. Discussion In this study, we asked whether an optogenetic strategy could successfully initiate regeneration of a complex vertebrate structure in vivo. Previous work from our laboratory has demonstrated that a specific early proton efflux generated by Fig.4. Endogenousregenerativepathwaysfollowarchactivationbylight. (A–D)Whole-mountinsituhybridizationsforNotch1andMsx1,components ofregenerationsignalingpathways.(A,B)Expressionintheregenerationbuds ofArch-tomatoinjectedembryosmaintainedinthedark(whitearrows).(C,D) Expressioninthe3dayspost-amputation(dpa)regenerationbudsofArch- Tomatoinjectedembryosmaintainedinthelightfor48hoursafteramputation (redarrows).Expressionismuchhigherinthelight-stimulatedtails. (E)Comparisonofthenumberofcellspositiveforphospho-histoneH3(H3P,a markerofmitoticactivity)intheregenerationbudsofArch-tomatoexpressing tailskeptinthedarkversusthelight.Thereweresignificantlymoreinthelight- stimulatedtails(t-test).(F–I)DICandfluorescenceimagesofa-tubulin(a neuronalmarker)ofArch-Tomatoexpressingtailsat3dpa.Tadpoleswerekept inthedarkversusthelightfor48hpa.(F,G)Non-regeneratingtailskeptinthe darkshowthetypicalarrangementofneuronsthathavestoppedgrowingor growninacurvetowardsthemidline.(H,I)Regeneratingtailskeptinthelight showthenormalarrangementofneuronsinaregeneratingtailthatisgrowing paralleltotheAPaxisofthetailandextendingintothegrowingtail,although notreachingallthewaytothedistaltip.Inallimages,anterioristotheleftand dorsalisup.Scalebars525mm. Optogenetic regeneration 311 trigger normal biochemical signaling pathways downstream of bioelectric triggers. Prior to measuring V , Arch-expressing embryos were mem incubated under the light or in the dark, but then were kept at ambientlightforupto15 minutespriortobeingmeasured.Thus, theaveragerelativehyperpolarizationof22 mVcausedbylight- stimulationofArchwasstableforatleastthatlong,orevenmore pronounced before the time spent at ambient conditions. This outcome highlights a critical difference between the cells under investigation here and the previously reported kinetics of Arch activation,wheretheassayforactivityisinhibitionorstimulation of an action potential lasting milliseconds. Specifically, the changeinV thatisinitiatedbyArchstimulationissustained mem for a much longer time. Light activation of Arch induces a H+-flux. Consistent with this function, our results showed that light-activated Arch alters both V and pH in Xenopus cells. Changes in V correlate mem mem with tadpole regenerative ability whereas a role for pH in regeneration has not been documented. To address this question we changed V and pH individually, to see whether either mem alone was sufficient for inducing regeneration. We recently showed that altering V by the use of an exogenous chloride mem channel is sufficient to regulate regenerative ability in tadpoles (TsengandLevin,2012).Here,wereportthatexpressionofNHE (asodium-protonexchangerthatproducesthepHgradientbyan electroneutral process), which tested the role of pH without a n e concomitant Vmem change, induced no improvement of p Fig.5. SummaryoftheeffectsoflightactivationofArch-tomatoon regeneration. Combined, these results suggest that it is unlikely O embryoswithblockedH+-V-ATPase.(A)Embryosexpressingadominant- that pH is a critical part of the mechanism for the initiation of gy negativeH+-V-ATPasesubunitdevelopseverecraniofacialdefects. regeneration and implicate the voltage change induced by Arch o (B)Illuminatingco-expressedArch-tomatofromstage9tostage26 as the key causal factor. ol significantlyreducesthenumberofcraniofacialabnormalities.(C)Embryos Bi exposedtothehighlyspecificH+-V-ATPaseinhibitorconcanamycinfor Wealsodiscoveredthatage-dependentregenerationrescueby 24hoursafteramputationatstage40developstereotypicalswellingsthendie, light-stimulated H+-pumping only occurs in tails with small consistentwithaneffectonosmoticbalanceregulation.(D)IlluminatingArch- populations of Arch-expressing cells at the distal tip of the tail; tomatoduringexposuretoconcanamycinpreventsswellingandsubsequent furthermore,thereisnocorrelationbetweenthepositionofthese mortality.(E)Tadpoletailsamputatedatstage47normallydonotregenerate. cells and the positions of neural tissue. Correct nerve patterning (F)IlluminatingArch-tomatofor48hoursafteramputationsignificantly increasesthenumberofregeneratingtailsifthereisasmallgroupofArch- has been shown to be necessary for full regeneration; however, expressingcellsatthedistalmosttipofthetail.Scalebars51mm. thepresenceofArch-expressingcellsindistal,non-neuronalcells of regenerates is more highly correlated with stimulation of the V-ATPase H+ pump at the amputation site is required to regeneration,aswellaswithnormalgrowthoftheneuronsalong initiate Xenopus tail regeneration, while inactivation of V- the anterior–posterior axis. As H+-V-ATPase is not expressed in ATPase function in amputated tail stumps leads to regenerative thespinalcordampullaeaftertailamputation,thesedatasuggest failure.Asproof-of-concept,wedemonstratethatthelight-gated that the repolarization of regeneration bud cells through H+- H+ pump, Archaerhodopsin, can be expressed in non-excitable efflux is likely acting non-cell autonomously to drive embryonic and tail cells of Xenopus laevis and it hyperpolarizes regeneration of neural tissue and then the tail. The thosecellswhenexposedtolight(Fig. 2).Furthermore,weshow development of tissue-specific tools in Xenopus will enable us that light-activated Arch activity restores regeneration in the to further address this question in the future. absence of endogenous H+ efflux (Fig. 3). Exploiting the Thedatarevealedseveralimportantnewaspectsofbioelectric temporal control of Arch afforded by its light-sensitivity, we control of regeneration. First, the light stimulation was stopped establish that the duration of H+-flux needed to start the precisely at 48 hours post-injury; reliable wash-out of regeneration pathway need not be long term, and, importantly pharmacological inhibitors or inactivation of misexpressed forfuturebiomedicaluse,thatH+-effluxtherapycanbeginafter genes cannot be done in this system, and these data amputation. Consistent withthe knownrole of voltage-mediated demonstrated that hyperpolarization during the first 2 days is earlystepsinregeneration,light-activatedArchsignalsupstream sufficienttoinducethe entirecomplex,highlycoordinated,self- of canonical pathways required for tail regrowth (Fig. 4). limiting7-daycascadeoftailrebuilding.Second,itwasseenthat Importantly, it overcomes the chemical and molecular function of Arch in the spinal cord was not required for inhibition of endogenous H+-flux and, notably, the regeneration (Fig. 3C,D). Given the known importance of nerve physiological inhibition of regeneration such as is found in supplyforregeneration(Gaeteetal.,2012;Thornton,1970),itis humans.Toourknowledge,thesearethefirstdatatodemonstrate important for the development of biomedical strategies to note thatanoptogeneticapproachisfeasibleandusefulindeveloping that bioelectric stimulation of other tissues can induce a strong and regenerative systems in vivo, and that it can successfully repairprogram.Finally,weshowedthatoptogeneticinductionof Optogenetic regeneration 312 regenerative repair activates known transcriptional cascades asimilartemperature,butunderalightblockingcover.After2days,tadpoleswere transferredtofresh0.16MMRat22˚C,thenscored5dayslater.Priortodirect (Fig. 4) and can thus potentially be used to regulate these measurementofmembranevoltage(V )byimpalingwithamicroelectrode,the pathways in multiple contexts. lightregimewasalteredto5secondsmoenmthen10secondsofftoinsurethatArch In summary, we utilized the temporal activation of an ion wasactiveandcouldbelight-stimulatedbeforecellsweretoosmall. current via a light-gated pump to initiate coordinated system- level changes to prevent craniofacial malformations or restore pHmeasurements Tails of Arch-Tomato expressing stage 47 tadpoles were amputated. Four days age-dependent loss of regenerative ability (Fig. 5). Instead of later,afterincubationinthelight,tadpoleswereincubatedin5mM29,79-Bis-(2- controllinganimalbehaviororspikingintheCNSormuscle,our Carboxyethyl)-5-(and6)-Carboxyfluorescein,AcetoxymethylEster(BCECF-AM) studyindicatesthatitispossibletoaffectfundamentalalteration or Semi-Naphthyl Rhodofluor-5 Acetoxymethyl Ester (SNARF-5F) for 2hours. in body structures, without adversely affecting overall Excess dye was washed out, then the embryos were lightly anesthetized with 0.15%MS222andimaged.MeasurementsweremadeusinganOlympusBX-61 development, by manipulation of bioelectrical signals. This withepifluorescenceoptics;illuminationwasfromaLumen200metalhalidelamp. finding has important implications since ion transport is well- ToimageBCECF,adualexcitationdye,filterswereEX450/20,D460,EM535/ knownforbeingessentialnotonlyforexcitablecellbehavior,but 30(theisobesticpoint)andEX500/20,D515,EM535/30.ToimageSNARF-5F, adualemissiondye,filterswereEX540/25,D565andD610,andEM580/25(the also for the body’s anatomical homeostasis. Furthermore, the isoemissive point) or EM 640/25. Metamorph software was used to perform regulationofionfluxhasincreasinglybeenidentifiedasacritical darkfieldandflatfieldcorrectionsandtocreateratioimages,500/450forBCECF player in diseases including cancer. Moreover, there have and 640/580 for SNARF-5F. Images were transferred to PhotoshopTM with no recently been concerns raised about the safety of proton pump changestopixelintensitiesandthehistogramfunctionwasusedtocalculatemeans andstandarddeviationsofpixelintensitiesinregionsofinterest(ROIs)chosenon inhibitors taken during pregnancy and their links to resulting images of Arch-tomato fluorescence then transferred to the ratio images. birth defects (Gill et al., 2009; Pasternak and Hviid, 2010). Our Conversion from differences in intensity to differences in pH were made using application of optogenetics to the control of complex conversiondatafromtheliterature(Morleyetal.,1996;Sasakietal.,1992). developmental and regenerative bioelectrical events, and the Electrophysiology regulation of known transcriptional cascades by brief optical V wasmeasureddirectlyusingaWarnerInstrumentsOocyteClampAmplifier stimulation of cells demonstrates the enormous potential for mem model OC-725C with oocyte pathclamp model 7251.I (Harvard Apparatus expanding the use of light-controlled ion flux beyond regulating Company, Hampden, CT). Borosilicate microelectrodes (O.D. 1.0mm, I.D. action potentials in nerve and muscle tissues. Indeed, there is 0.50mm)werepulledonaSutterInstrumentsFlamingBrownP-97micropipette puller (P5500; heat5257; pull560; vel5100; time5200) and the tips were tremendous potential to address questions about ion-flux based n brokenbyhand.Electrodeswerefilledwith2MKClandtheembryoswerebathed e disease, such as cancer, and especially for new approaches in in0.16MMR.EmbryosthathadbeeninjectedwithArchmRNAattheonecell p regenerative medicine. stage,thenkeptunderlightorinthedark,weremovedtotherigandkeptunder O ambientlightforupto15minutespriorto,andthenduring,measurement. y g Materials and Methods o Xenopushusbandryandexperimentation Scoringofregenerationefficiency ol Thisstudywascarriedoutinstrictaccordancewiththerecommendationsinthe Regenerativeabilitywasquantifiedbyexaminingtheamputatedtails7daysafter Bi GuidefortheCareandUseofLaboratoryAnimalsoftheNationalInstitutesof amputation.Ascoringsystemwasusedtodividethetadpolesintofourcategories: no,bad,good,andfullregeneration,asdescribedpreviously(Adamsetal.,2007). Health.TheprotocolwasapprovedbyTuftsUniversity’sInstitutionalAnimalCare Regenerative ability was then summarized as a score called the Regeneration andUseCommittee(TuftsIACUCprotocol#M2011-70).Embryoswerecollected Index,with0indicatingnoregenerationofanyindividualand300indicatingfull and maintained as described previously (Sive et al., 2000) and grown in 0.16 regeneration of all animals. YCHE78’s effect on development was scored by ModifiedMarc’sRingers(MMR).StagingwasaccordingtoNieuwkoopandFaber dividing embryos into three categories: normal patterning and face; heterotaxia (Nieuwkoop and Faber, 1967). Tail amputation was performed at stage 47 (a (abnormal left–right positioning of the gut, gall bladder or heart loop) and/or refractorystage)forphysiologicalinhibition,asdescribedpreviously(Adamset craniofacialabnormalities;ordead. al.,2007;Tsengetal.,2010).Formolecularstudies,Xenopusembryoswerefixed overnight in MEMFA (Sive et al., 2000). In situ hybridization was carried out accordingtostandardprotocols(Harland,1991)withprobestoNotch1(Coffman Microscopy etal.,1990),andMsx1(Feledyetal.,1999).Antibodiesusedwereanti-acetylated Fluorescence microscopy was performed on an Olympus BX-61 compound a-tubulin(Sigma#T6793),andanti-phospo-histone-3(H3P;Upstate#05-598)at microscope using, for Arch-GFP EX470/20, D485, EM517/23, and for Arch- 1:1000dilution. tomatoEX545/20,D565,EM595/50.Forlowermagnification/resolutionimages,a NikonSMZ-1500withepifluorescenceopticsandsimilarfiltersetswasused. mRNAinjection Arch-GFPorArch-Tomatowasinjectedat60610pg;thisdosewasdeterminedto Statistics haveactivitywithoutcausinglethality.BecauseoftheverylowsalinityofMMR, Alltestsonoptogeneticconstructscomparedthelightversusdarktreatments.The othercandidatehyperpolarizingoptogeneticreagentswerefoundtobeunsuitable effectsoflightanddarkintheabsenceofArch(noArchcontrols)werecompared forthissystem;additionally,nooptogeneticreagentthatcandepolarizeembryonic separatelyandshowednodifferences(supplementarymaterialTableS1).T-tests orectodermalXenopuscellswerefoundinourtestingofdozensofoptogenetic were used to compare the results of electrophysiological measurements, protein constructs. Injection of 461ng of YCHE78 mRNA at the one cell physiological inhibition experiments, and numbers of H3P-positive cells. A (fertilized egg) stage caused both left–right patterning defects and craniofacial Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare the distributions of wild-type, abnormalities.Formolecularinhibitionrescue,60610pgofArch-TomatomRNA abnormal,anddeadtadpolesresultingfromYCHE78injection.ForArchactivity, wasco-injected with the YCHE78 mRNA (Adams etal., 2007). Forthe NHE3 thenumberofH3P-positivecells,andArch+YCHE,samplesizeswerethenumber experiments, because intracellular [Na+] in blastomeres is higher than [Na+] of ofindividualtadpoles.Tocompareregenerationindices(regenerationability)after MMR(21mMversus9.9mM),0.16MMRwassupplementedwith42mMNa- refractory amputation, the sample sizes were the number of dishes, which gluconatetofacilitateactivityoftheNHE3antiporter. collectively represented 428 tadpoles. The effects of NHE by [Na+]ext were comparedusingaKruskal–WallistestfollowedbyDunn’sQtoidentifypairwise significantdifferences. Lighttreatment LighttreatmentconsistedofplacingPetridishesoftail-amputatedtadpoleseither (a)beneathanarrayofsixLEDs(471nm)atadistanceresultinginirradianceof Acknowledgements 0.560.1mW/mm2or(b)intoalight-tightboxcontainingtwofiberopticcables TheauthorsthankPunitaKoustubhanandAmberBrandforXenopus connected to SugarCube LEDs (Boston Engineering, Waltham, MA) delivering care;EdBoydenforArch-GFPandadviceonoptogenetics;Ravshan 0.860.1mW/mm2of463nmlight.Topreventphototoxicityandheatingofthe SabirovfortheNHE3plasmid;JoanLemireandClaireStevensonfor mediumduringthe48hoursofexposure,disheswereplacedoncoolingstagesto maintainthetemperaturebetween18and20˚Candlightswererepeatedlyturned cloningoftheplasmids;andTalShomratandBrookChernetforhelp onfor500millisecondsthenofffor2seconds.Alldarkcontroldisheswerekeptat with electrophysiology. M.L. gratefully acknowledges support from Optogenetic regeneration 313 NIH (GM078484, AR055993), NSF (DBI-1152279), and the Illingworth,C.M.(1974).Trappedfingersandamputatedfingertipsinchildren.J. G. Harold and Leila Y. Mathers Charitable Foundation. This work Pediatr.Surg.9,853-858. Illingworth, C. M. and Barker, A. T. (1980). Measurement of electrical currents wasalsosupportedbytheTelemedicine andAdvanced Technology emergingduringtheregenerationofamputatedfingertipsinchildren.Clin.Phys. Research Center (TATRC) at the US Army Medical Research and Physiol.Meas.1,87. Materiel Command (USAMRMC) through award W81XWH-10-2- Kno¨pfel,T.,Lin,M.Z.,Levskaya,A.,Tian,L.,Lin,J.Y.andBoyden,E.S.(2010). 0058. Towardthesecondgenerationofoptogenetictools.J.Neurosci.30,14998-15004. Levin,M.(2009).Bioelectricmechanismsinregeneration:uniqueaspectsandfuture perspectives.Semin.CellDev.Biol.20,543-556. Competing Interests Levin, M. (2012). Molecular bioelectricityin developmental biology:new tools and The authors havenocompetinginterests todeclare. recentdiscoveries:controlofcellbehaviorandpatternformationbytransmembrane potentialgradients.Bioessays34,205-217. Morley, G. E., Taffet, S. M. and Delmar, M. (1996). Intramolecular interactions References mediatepHregulationofconnexin43channels.Biophys.J.70,1294-1302. Adams, D. S., Masi, A. and Levin, M. (2007). H+ pump-dependent changes in Nieuwkoop, P. D. and Faber, J. (1967). Normal Table Of Xenopus Laevis membrane voltage are an early mechanism necessary and sufficient to induce (Daudin): A Systematical And Chronological Survey Of The Development From Xenopustailregeneration.Development134,1323-1335. TheFertilizedEggTillTheEndOfMetamorphosis,2ndedition.Amsterdam:North- Beane,W.S.,Morokuma,J.,Adams,D.S.andLevin,M.(2011).Achemicalgenetics HollandPublishingCompany. approachrevealsH,K-ATPase-mediatedmembranevoltageisrequiredforplanarian Pai,V.P.,Aw,S.,Shomrat,T.,Lemire,J.M.andLevin,M.(2012).Transmembrane headregeneration.Chem.Biol.18,77-89. voltagepotentialcontrolsembryoniceyepatterninginXenopuslaevis.Development Beck,C.W.,Christen,B.andSlack,J.M.(2003).Molecularpathwaysneededfor 139,313-323. regenerationofspinalcordandmuscleinavertebrate.Dev.Cell5,429-439. Pasternak,B.andHviid,A.(2010).Useofproton-pumpinhibitorsinearlypregnancy Chow,B.Y.,Han,X.,Dobry,A.S.,Qian,X.,Chuong,A.S.,Li,M.,Henninger, andtheriskofbirthdefects.N.Engl.J.Med.363,2114-2123. M.A.,Belfort,G.M.,Lin,Y.,Monahan,P.E.etal.(2010).High-performance Praetorius,J., Andreasen, D., Jensen, B. L.,Ainsworth, M. A., Friis, U. G. and geneticallytargetableopticalneuralsilencingbylight-drivenprotonpumps.Nature Johansen, T. (2000). NHE1, NHE2, and NHE3 contribute to regulation of 463,98-102. intracellularpHinmurineduodenalepithelialcells.Am.J.Physiol.278,G197-G206. Coffman,C.,Harris,W.andKintner,C.(1990). Xotch,theXenopushomologof Sabirov, R. Z., Azimov, R. R., Ando-Akatsuka, Y., Miyoshi, T. and Okada, Y. Drosophilanotch.Science249,1438-1441. (1999). Na+ sensitivity of ROMK1 K+ channel: role of the Na+/H+ antiporter. J. Douglas,B.S.(1972).Conservativemanagementofguillotineamputationofthefinger Membr.Biol.172,67-76. inchildren.Aust.Paediatr.J.8,86-89. Sasaki,S.,Ishibashi,K.,Nagai,T.andMarumo,F.(1992).Regulationmechanismsof Feledy,J.A.,Beanan,M.J.,Sandoval,J.J.,Goodrich,J.S.,Lim,J.H.,Matsuo- intracellularpHofXenopuslaevisoocyte.Biochim.Biophys.Acta1137,45-51. Takasaki,M.,Sato,S.M.andSargent,T.D.(1999).Inhibitorypatterningofthe Sive, H. L., Grainger, R. M. and Harland, R. M. (2000). Early Development Of anteriorneuralplateinXenopusbyhomeodomainfactorsDlx3andMsx1.Dev.Biol. Xenopus Laevis: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor (NY): Cold Spring 212,455-464. HarborLaboratoryPress. Gaete,M.,Mun˜oz,R.,Sa´nchez,N.,Tampe,R.,Moreno,M.,Contreras,E.G.,Lee- Thornton,C.S.(1970).Amphibianlimbregenerationanditsrelationtonerves.Am. n Liu, D. and Larra´ın, J. (2012). Spinal cord regeneration in Xenopus tadpoles Zool.10,113-118. e proceedsthroughactivationofSox2-positivecells.NeuralDev.7,13. Tseng, A.-S. and Levin, M. (2012). Transducing bioelectric signals into epigenetic p Gill,S.K.,O’Brien,L.,Einarson,T.R.andKoren,G.(2009).Thesafetyofproton pathwaysduringtadpoletailregeneration.Anat.Rec.295,1541-1551. O pump inhibitors (PPIs) in pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 104, Tseng,A.S.,Beane,W.S.,Lemire,J.M.,Masi,A.andLevin,M.(2010).Induction 1541-1545,quiz1540,1546. of vertebrate regeneration by a transient sodium current. J. Neurosci. 30, 13192- y g Harland,R.M.(1991).Insituhybridization:animprovedwholemountmethodfor 13200. o Xenopusembryos.InXenopusLaevis:PracticalUsesInCellAndMolecularBiology Vandenberg, L. N., Morrie,R. D. andAdams, D. S. (2011). V-ATPase-dependent ol (MethodsInCellBiology,Vol.36)(ed.B.K.KayandH.B.Peng),pp.685-695.San ectodermalvoltageandpHregionalizationarerequiredforcraniofacialmorphogenesis. Bi Diego(CA):AcademicPress. Dev.Dyn.240,1889-1904. Optogenetic regeneration S1 Supplementary Material DanySpencerAdamsetal.doi:10.1242/bio.20133665 Table S1. Summary of statistical analyses. Valuefor Valuefor Valueof Experiment Measurement N dark light Test statistic P Archactivity V 12 2268 4067 t-test t53.541 0.002 mem Arch+YCHE Craniofacialabnormalities 149 6309 4866 MWU Z53.423 ,0.001 Arch+stage47amputation Regenerativeability 16 45624 111658 t-test t53.709 0.002 Arch+stage47amputation NumberofH3P-positivecells 22 463 1264 t-test t55.237 ,0.001 NoArchcontrols Notreatment V 6 2962 2962 t-test t50.346 0.426 mem YCHE78 Craniofacialabnormalities 105 2665 2901 MWU Z520.67 .0.5 Stage47amputation Regenerativeability 14 69644 49630 t-test t51.464 0.167 n e p O y g o ol Bi