Life and Death at Work Industrial Accidents as a Case of Socially Produced Error PLENUM STUDIES IN WORK AND INDUSTRY Series Editors: lvar Berg, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and Arne L. Kalleberg, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina WORK AND INDUSTRY Structures, Markets, and Processes Arne L. I<alleberg and Ivar Berg THE BUREAUCRATIC LABOR MARKET The Case of the Federal Ovil Service Thomas A. DiPrete ENRICHING BUSINESS ETHICS Edited by Clarence C. Walton ENSURING MINORITY SUCCESS IN CORPORATE MANAGEMENT Edited by Donna E. Thompson and Nancy DiTomaso INDUSTRIES, FIRMS, AND JOBS Sociological and Economic Approaches Edited by George Farkas and Paula England LIFE AND DEATH AT WORK Industrial Accidents as a Case of Socially Produced Error Tom Dwyer MATERNAL EMPLOYMENT AND CHILDREN'S DEVELOPMENT Longitudinal Research Edited by Adele Eskeles Gottfried and Allan W. Gottfried THE STATE AND THE LABOR MARKET Edited by Samuel Rosenberg WORKERS, MANAGERS, AND TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE Emerging Patterns of Labor Relations Edited by Daniel B. Cornfield A Continuation Order Plan is available for this series. A continuation order will bring delivery of each new volume immediately upon publication. Volumes are billed only upon actual shipment. For further information please contact the publisher. Life and Death at Work Industrial Accidents as a Case of Socially Produced Error Tom Dwyer Universidade Estadual de Campinas Sao Paulo, Brazil Springer Science+Business Media, LLC L1brary of Congreea Catalog1ng-1n-Publ1cat1on Data Dwyer, To•. L1fe and daath at work : 1ndustr1al acc1dants as a casa of soclally produced error 1 Tol Dwyar. p.' c1. -- <Plenu• studlas In work and lndustry> Includas b1bllographlcal refarencas and Index. ISBN 978-1-4899-0608-3 ISBN 978-1-4899-0606-9 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-1-4899-0606-9 1. Industrial accldents. 2. Industrial safety. I. Tltla. II. Sarles. HD7262.088 1991 363. 11' 1--dc20 91-22166 CIP Cover illustration: Black-and-white reproduction of Diagonale by Wassily Kandinsky, Sprengel Museum, Hanover, Germany. Copyright 1991 ARS, N.Y.I ADAGP. ISBN 978-1-4899-0608-3 © 1991 Springer Science+Business Media New York Originally published by Plenum Press, New York in 1991 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1s t edition 1991 Ali rights reserved No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, microfilming, recording, or otherwise, without written permission from the Publisher To Cassia Preface This book benefited from the financial support of a French Government scholarship between 1976 and 1978. It sponsored a doctoral thesis in which initial theoretical, empirical, and historical reflections on acci dents were developed and written while I was a student at the Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales in Paris. The New Zealand Depart ment of Labour funded a study on industrial accidents and night work during 1979-80. In 1982-83, the award of a postdoctoral fellowship by the University of Canterbury (New Zealand) permitted a first version of this book to be finished. In the summer of 1986-87 the Funda~ao de a Amparo Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) and the Labora toire d'Ergonomie et de Neurophysiologie du Travail of the Centre Na tional des Arts et Metiers joined forces to fund a stay in Paris where the second draft of this book was presented in a special doctoral seminar series. The third draft was completed during a 1988 research leave granted by the Conjunto de Ciencia Politica of the Universidade Es tadual de Campinas (UNICAMP). On a further research leave from the same unit, and thanks to a postdoctoral fellowship from the Brazilian Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnol6gico (CNPq), final redrafting was carried out between August and October 1990 when I was a visiting fellow in the Science, Technology, and Society Program at Cornell University. I am deeply grateful to these institutions for their generosity. To carry out research such as this, much more than financial sup port is necessary. Various trade unions affiliated with the New Zealand Federation of Labour, as well as the New Zealand Employers' Federation and the New Zealand Manufacturers' Association, all opened doors to facilitate access to research sites. In France a similar role was played by the Parisian section of the Organisme Professionnel de Prevention du vii viii Preface Batiment et des Travaux Publics (OPPBTP) and the construction and factory inspectors' sections of the Confederation Fran~aise du Travail (CFDT). Once companies had agreed to research being conducted, and once introduced into workplaces, I observed work, examined company statis tics and records, and conducted many semistructured interviews. Work ers, unionists, foremen, managers, medical specialists, ergonomists, and others spared their time to talk with me. Their judgments, reflec tions, and perceptions provide crucial raw material for this book. How ever, another side of my contact with many of these people left a pro found impression: their harsh judgments of, indignation at, and emotional reactions to their exposure to risks that others, frequently more privileged, did not experience. A strong impression was also left by others, especially those who in positions of responsibility suffered genuine moral dilemmas as they managed work in ways that they knew would lead to accidents. The efforts of both parties to cover up and sublimate the question and their seemingly paradoxical eagerness to talk about it provided a constant stimulus to push forward with research and reflection. Thus, the information these people provided, the warmth with which they received me, and the manner in which they opened up their hearts were important ingredients of this research process. Many safety professionals and government employees outside of the research sites have also generously given of their time and wisdom in trying to help me better understand their worlds. Over the years a number of people, milieus, and events have been crucial to the development of my intellectual life and through this have played a role in shaping this book. My earliest research into accidents reflected the combined input of three teachers at Victoria University (New Zealand): Stephen Mugford, my first sociology teacher; Jan Pouw er, my first theory teacher; and Allan Levett, my first teacher of so ciological theory. This book is made up of six chapters, each of which was written at a different point in time and space. The influence of an intellectual milieu such as that provided by Paris or Sao Paulo is something that almost by a process of osmosis penetrates and constantly reshapes one's views of social theory and of the world. Also, crucial events, such as the explo sion of the space shuttle Challenger, would call for modifications to certain theoretical notions that I had thought already "fully developed." The shape of a final text has much to do with such influences. The inputs of certain individuals have also left their marks; to cite some by name: Plenum Series Editors Arne Kalleberg and Ivar Berg, David Buxton, Adrian Raftery, Maurice Godelier, Bill Willmott, Sami Preface ix Dassa, Dan Berman, Bob Gidlow, Katy Richmond, and especially Geoff Fougere and Allan Levett. These people have, either by reading drafts, discussing ideas, or pointing in certain directions, contributed to the book. Gratitude that goes back to a distant past when Raphael Samuel and Maxine Berg in England gave some crucial dues and support in my first primitive attempts to understand the history of accidents must also be expressed. The initial ideas that gave rise to this book were brought together in a doctoral thesis that was defended in a public "trial by jury" in Paris in December 1978. M. Jacques Lautman suggested that future research be conducted in more controlled environments than those studied in my research of the construction sector. This suggestion influenced the shape of future testing of the theory. M. Alain Wisner, who would later kindly provide further guidance and support, developed arguments that would force me to be more attentive to the work that other disciplines, and in particular ergonomics, were doing in the field. On that same day a number of points of ongoing debate with my thesis supervisor, Alain Touraine, would be aired. Over the years, M. Touraine has been both patient and generous in his encouragement of this research. His remark able sociological intuition has helped push the research forward in new directions and his perceptive critical comments have served to guide me out of many a theoretical jungle. Should I appear to the reader to have flawed reasoning, or to be lost or without direction, the responsibility is no one's other than my own. ToM DWYER Contents Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Life and Death at Work: Three Insights, One Context . . . . . . . . . . 2 Changing Images of Work Accidents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 A "Near Miss'' Accident: The Original Motivation for Sociological Inquiry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 The Casting of a Shadow: The Distance between Emergent Sociological and Modern Approaches to Safety . . . . . . . . . 4 A Case of Socially Produced Error: Industrial Accidents . . . . . . . . 4 Accidents as a Social Problem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Relationships between Research Methods and Theory Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Chapter 1 From Sin to Social Peace: The Origins of the Modem Treatments of Industrial Accidents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 The Birth of the Modem Notion of Industrial Accidents . . . . . . . . 14 The Children's Employment Commission . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 The Birth of Safety Engineering: Employers, Workers, and the Davy Lamp . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Six Effects of Technically Conceived Safety Instruments . . . . 21 A Turning Point . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 The Victory of the Industrial Capitalist Model of Prevention . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 Accident Prevention as Political Rationality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 Compensation for Accidents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 xi