ebook img

Lead Ammunition Survey Summary PDF

27 Pages·2016·2.36 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Lead Ammunition Survey Summary

Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Lead Ammunition Survey Summary Concern and scrutiny over the use of lead ammunition in regards to human health and wildlife has increased in recent years. California’s 2013 legislative action to phase out all lead ammunition has brought heightened attention to lead ammunition use in Oregon and other states. This concern and attention prompted the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife to partner with Oregon State University’s Survey Research Center and Wildlife Extension to design and conduct a public opinion survey on lead ammunition use and related issues. The results of the 2014 survey are currently being analyzed by Oregon State University for publication in a scientific journal. The knowledge gained from this survey will inform decision makers of perceptions about the use of lead ammunition and the perceived impacts on humans and wildlife by both the hunting community and the general public. Separate surveys were designed and conducted for hunters and the general public. The hunter survey included 33 questions in order to get more specific details on current firearm and ammunition usage for big game and unprotected mammal & furbearer hunts. Therefore the general public survey consisted of fewer questions. Both groups responded to a subset of questions that allowed comparison of opinions, knowledge, and preferences between the two groups. The following provides a basic summary of the findings; and in some cases hunter and public responses to questions were displayed side by side in order to best present the data. All tables and charts were generated from survey responses and created by Oregon State University’s Survey Research Center. Due to differences in response rate to individual questions, percentage may not total exactly 100 percent. For more information about the survey and to see the survey questions you can go to: http://www.dfw.state.or.us/wildlife/lead/index.asp Response Information Hunter - All Mail and Web/Mail Response Rate by Mode 40% 35% 30% 25% 15% 20% Web 35% Paper 15% 10% 16% 5% 0% All Mail Web/Mail Public – Conducted solely by mail. Hunter - Response Rates for each Region by Survey Mode, with a consistent Response Rate across Regions 40.0% 35.0% 30.0% 6.3% 8.1% 7.4% 8.1% 25.0% 20.0% Web 15.0% 26.8% 26.6% 24.2% 24.3% 10.0% Paper 5.0% 0.0% Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife P a ge | 2 Hunting Experience (Hunter & Public) Public Q2: Have you ever hunted using a firearm? Percent of Respondents (Public) 2% 42% 56% Random sample of public showed a relatively high percentage of people who had hunted at some time in the past. Hunter Q3: Did you hunt in Oregon anytime from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013? Percent of Respondents (Hunters) Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife P a ge | 3 Hunter Q4: For 2013, did you use a bow, firearms, or both bow and firearms to hunt? Percent of Respondents Using Bow, Firearms, or Both to Hunt in Oregon in 2013 Firearms users (shotgun and/or rifle) comprise the bulk of hunters surveyed. Hunter Q5: About how many total days did you spend hunting with a firearm in Oregon during 2013? Number of Days in 2013 Respondents Hunted 22% 22% 17% 14% 13% 12% 0% 1-3 days 4-6 days 7-9 days 10-13 days 14-20 days21 or more No days response Firearms hunters include upland birds, waterfowl, big game, furbearers and unprotected mammals. Number of days hunted may reflect hunting multiple species and seasons. Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife P a ge | 4 Hunter Q6-9: Did you hunt migratory game birds, waterfowl, upland game birds, turkey, or big game in Oregon in 2013? 82% 21% 17% 15% Q6. Migratory game Q7. Upland game Q8. Big game with Q9. Big game with birds and waterfowl birds or wild turkey non-lead lead with non-lead Some hunters are already hunting with non-lead ammunition. Until now, we have not had any solid information on use of non-lead ammunition in Oregon. Migratory game birds includes dove and band-tailed pigeon. Hunter Q10: When hunting big game using ammunition that contains lead do you mostly use ammunition off-the-shelf/mail order, reloaded, or an equal combination of both? 1% Mostly off-the-shelf/mail order 16% Mostly reloaded Equal combination of off- 24% the-shelf/mail order and 60% reloaded No response Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife P a ge | 5 Hunter Q11: Type of firearm used for hunting big game in Oregon in 2013? 92% 32% 18% 9% 5% Centerfire rifle Handgun Shotgun Muzzleloader Other Hunter Q12: What are the reasons, if any, that would influence you to switch to non-lead ammunition for hunting big game in Oregon? Among hunters, use of non-lead ammunition is affected by questions about performance, the science behind the issue, availability and cost. Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife P a ge | 6 Hunter Q15: When hunting unprotected mammals or furbearers using ammunition that contains lead do you mostly use ammunition off-the-shelf/mail order, reloaded, or an equal combination of both? Hunter Q16: Type of firearm used for hunting unprotected mammals or furbearers in Oregon in 2013? 80% 76% 45% 43% 7% 3% Centerfire Rimfire rifle Handgun Shotgun Muzzleloader Other rifle Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife P a ge | 7 Hunter Q17: What are the reasons, if any, that would influence you to switch to non-lead ammunition for hunting unprotected mammals or furbearers in Oregon? 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% i. Under no circumstances would I switch to non-lead ammunition. c. If I knew non-lead ammunition performance (e.g., accuracy, killing… b. If I knew there were negative health effects of lead on Oregon’s wildlife … d. If there were greater local availability of non-lead ammunition. a. If I knew there were negative health effects of lead on people. h. If I received a coupon that would offset the additional cost of purchasing… e. If there were greater availability of non-lead ammunition online. j. Other g. If the cost was no more than 25% higher than lead-based ammunition. f. If the cost was 25% - 50% higher than lead-based ammunition. These responses provide insights to the factors respondents would consider in making a switch to non-lead ammunition when hunting unprotected mammals and furbearers. Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife P a ge | 8 Hunter Q19: Which of the following have been sources of information for you regarding the effects of ammunition that contains lead? 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% h. Sportsmen's magazine i. Mass media d. Other hunters f. NRA or other k. Hunting organization b. ODFW printed materials a. ODFW website j. Federal agency l. Conservation/Environmental… c. ODFW employee(s) g. Health provider/doctor e. OSU Extension service m. Other Hunter Q20: Of those that have been a source of information for you (as stated in Q19), which 3 do you feel are the most reliable sources. 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% h. Sportsmen's magazine f. NRA or other k. Hunting organization d. Other hunters b. ODFW printed materials a. ODFW website i. Mass media j. Federal agency m. Other l. Conservation/Environmental… g. Health provider/doctor c. ODFW employee(s) e. OSU Extension service Sports magazines, NRA, and hunters are the preferred sources of information on this issue. Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife P a ge | 9 COMPARISON – Source vs Credibility (Hunters) m. Other e. OSU Extension service g. Health provider/doctor c. ODFW employee(s) l. Conservation/Environmental… j. Federal agency a. ODFW website Source b. ODFW printed materials Credibility k. Hunting organization f. NRA or other d. Other hunters i. Mass media h. Sportsmen's magazine 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% Identifies various sources hunters use to gather information and provides insights into the credibility of each of these sources. Hunter Q22: Information about ammunition choices and lead effects can be delivered to hunters in many ways. Which 2 of these do you most prefer? 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Printed materials (newsletters, magazines,… ODFW hunting regulations Online Personal contact TV or radio Email Other Social media Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife P a ge | 10

Description:
When asked about an option in which region-specific regulations would allow use of lead-based ammunition but require gut pile removal from the hunting field, there was general agreement between general public and hunter respondents, although strong opposition was greater among hunters.
See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.