LAUGHING FROM THE OUTSIDE: HIPSTERS AND AMERICAN STAND-UP COMEDY By CHRISTOPHER PERKINS Bachelor of Arts in English Texas State University San Marcos, Texas 2006 Master of Arts in English Texas State University San Marcos, Texas 2008 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May, 2017 LAUGHING FROM THE OUTSIDE: HIPSTERS AND AMERICAN STAND-UP COMEDY Dissertation Approved: Dr. Elizabeth Grubgeld Dissertation Adviser Dr. Jeffrey Walker Dr. Richard Frohock Dr. Perry Gethner ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project was made possible through the support of the faculty in the English department at Oklahoma State University, the careful critique of my advisory committee, and the thoughtful guidance of my advisor Dr. Elizabeth Grubgeld. I am also eternally grateful to my family for their love and support throughout the years. Finally, Dr. Jennifer Edwards has remained by my side throughout the process of composing this dissertation, and her love, patience, and criticism have played an essential role in its completion. iii Acknowledgements reflect the views of the author and are not endorsed by committee members or Oklahoma State University. Name: CHRISTOPHER PERKINS Date of Degree: MAY, 2017 Title of Study: LAUGHING FROM THE OUTSIDE: HIPSTERS AND AMERICAN STAND-UP COMEDY Major Field: ENGLISH Abstract: In recent years, stand-up comedy has enjoyed increased attention from both popular and scholarly audiences for its potential as a forum for public intellectualism. This study traces this rise in prominence to the hipster as both a cultural figure in post- war America and a comic persona in the years that followed. Through identification and analysis of the hipster and its aesthetic traits, I attempt to follow this persona and the type of comedy it performs from its origins to its current examples in order to understand what role this persona may play in both stand-up’s popularity and in society at large. The hipster is a stand-up persona that utilizes a hip sensibility and satiric perspective both to produce itself and to critique the modes of production and consumption with which it interacts through constant and evolving use of technology and new media as a conduit for personal, existential, and social play. I begin with Lenny Bruce’s hipster and, using the development of technology as my organizing principle, follow the footprints of hip through Bruce to Richard Pryor and then to twenty-first-century comedians Bo Burnham and Aziz Ansari. This study reveals the comic and intellectual sensibility of the hipster persona in its various iterations and examines that persona’s role in the development of comedy as an intellectual forum in American society in the last half-century. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page PREFACE: WHAT WE TALK ABOUT WHEN WE TALK ABOUT STAND-UP COMEDY ................................................................................................................1 I. WHAT IS A HIPSTER? .............................................................................................6 Footprints: Tracing the Hipster ................................................................................7 Hip Performance ....................................................................................................14 Hip Humor: A Beginning.......................................................................................23 Hip Satirists and Satiric Hipsters ...........................................................................26 Hip Conduit: Hipsters and Media, a Shape for this Study .....................................33 II. COMEDY ALBUMS: VERBAL AND VISUAL PERSONA ON FANTASY RECORDS’ LENNY BRUCE ALBUMS 1959-1961 ...........................................40 Autobiography and Confessional Poetry ...............................................................44 Lenny Bruce and Hipster Comedian ......................................................................51 Visual Rhetoric/Visual Persona: The Sick Humor of Lenny Bruce (1959) ............57 Who Wore it Best?: Lenny Bruce, Mort Sahl, and Jewish Masculinity ................62 What’s so Sick about Peace, Love, and Understanding? .......................................68 The Humor of The Sick Humor of Lenny Bruce ....................................................72 Audaciously Paradoxical: I am Not a Nut, Elect Me! (1960) ................................80 American (1961) ....................................................................................................90 III. HIPSTERS ON FILM: LENNY BRUCE, RICHARD PRYOR, AND STAND-UP’S NEXT MEDIUM ...................................................................................................96 People v. Hipster: Lenny’s “Blah Blah Blah” .......................................................99 Old v. Aging Hipsters: Performance Films and Rhizomatice Persona ................105 Exit Bruce. Enter Richard Pryor: A Portrait of the Hipster on Film....................115 Wattstax, Documentary Film, and the Signifying Hipster ...................................119 Hip Interpreter: Richard Pryor Live in Concert ..................................................123 The Hipster’s Evolution: Richard Pryor Live on the Sunset Strip .......................130 Conclusion ...........................................................................................................140 v Chapter Page IV. NEW AND CONVERGENT MEDIA: POST-HIPSTERS BO BURNHAM AND AZIZ ANSARI.....................................................................................................142 Becoming Bo Burnham........................................................................................146 The Postmodern Self as Comic Subject ...............................................................148 what. Who: Beckett and Burnham and Postmodern Comedy..............................152 what. Why: Burnham and Bruce and the Post-Hipster ........................................158 what. Who: The Remix ........................................................................................161 Aziz Ansari: The Brown White Negro ................................................................164 The Sitcom Hipster: Aziz as Tom Haverford, or, Satirizing Superficial Hip ......166 Love and Marriage and Hipsters ..........................................................................172 Love, Empathy, and the Hip Nightmare: Superficial Reflections on Rude Shitty People ..................................................................................................................179 CONCLUSION: HIP TODAY AND TOMORROW: AZIZ ANSARI ON SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE, JANUARY 21, 2017 ....................................................................184 REFERENCES ..........................................................................................................192 APPENDIX ................................................................................................................202 vi LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1: The Sick Humor of Lenny Bruce ...........................................................................63 2: Mort Sahl’s Sweaters ............................................................................................64 3: I am Not a Nut, Elect Me! .....................................................................................84 4: Lenny Bruce--American ........................................................................................92 5: Bo Burnham: Postmodern Rock Star ..................................................................163 vii PREFACE WHAT WE TALK ABOUT WHEN WE TALK ABOUT STAND-UP COMEDY Comedy is all the rage these days. In popular media, critics like The Atlantic’s Megan Garber seek to understand “How Comedians Became Public Intellectuals” (May 2015). Beginning February 2017, CNN aired its eight-part documentary The History of Comedy exploring “what makes people laugh and how comedy has affected the social and political landscape throughout history.” In academic circles, the 2016 MLA Convention included its first-ever panel on stand-up, seeking “to provide a forum for serious consideration of the cultural and rhetorical work of stand-up comedy” (Rhetoricomedia). And, at the recent conference on Lenny Bruce’s legacy held at Brandeis University in October 2016, comedian Lewis Black jokingly accused conference participants of “legitimizing” comedy. Taken together, these examples indicate a growing awareness that, at this moment in American history, comedy seems particularly capable of capturing the public’s imagination and inspiring critical thought. To explore this phenomenon, I suggest a literary approach to the examination of American stand-up comedy’s rise in popularity and continued social importance by focusing my attention on the development of the 1 trickster figure as a stand-up persona. In the postwar years, a new type of trickster came onto the scene and altered the course of stand-up comedy and, I will argue, America’s relation to it. The trickster—well known and theorized in discussions of comedy, folklore, and American culture—becomes a popular and visible figure in stand-up comedy through the hipster persona of Lenny Bruce and then in the various hipsters that have taken the stage in the half-century since Bruce’s death.1 Recognizing that the label “hipster” is fraught with multiple, contradictory, and often negative connotations today, I want to employ it here as the subject of my study for three reasons. First, labeling the comedians under study here “hipsters” rather than simply “tricksters” points to an important point of separation between stand-up comedians and literary characters: unlike the rogues and clowns of novels or the tricksters of folklore, hipster comedians share a coterminous body with an actual living human being that is essential both to their humor and to that humor’s satiric potential as I will define and explore it in the coming chapters. Second, the contradictory and competing connotations of the hipster label lend 1 For a theoretical introduction to the comic and European literary origins of the trickster, see Bakhtin’s “Forms of Time and Chronotope in the Novel” in which Bakhtin theorizes the functions of Rogues, Clowns, and Fools as character types that exist as outsiders and subject humanity to parodic laughter; Bakhtin’s theories are taken up by Kathleen Rowe’s study of female comedians in The Unruly Woman in which Rowe argues for the disruptive force of the female trickster as a regenerative satirical trope. Mel Watkins’s history of African American humor from slavery to Chris Rock, On the Real Side, follows similar lines of thought specifically associating African American comedy with the tricksters of African and African American folklore, particularly Brer Rabbit and his human counterpart the cunning slave “John (sometimes Jack, Golias, Pompey, or Nehemiah)” (75). Watkins importantly recognizes the trickster as a figure that exists in many folklores, but whose African American iterations have played a crucial role in both the development of African American humor and the development of American society in the twentieth-century—a development which is also of interest to this study—because of their ability to enact social critique through ironic double-consciousness. John Leland’s Hip: the History places the trickster at the center of his discussion of hip’s history as America’s history when he argues that “tricksters are hip’s animating agents” (162). 2 themselves to this study because comedy deals precisely in these things: paradox, irony, and incongruity underlie all major theories of comedy and laughter from ancient Greece to the present day.2 Like comedy, which becomes increasingly difficult to define or explain the more scrutiny one gives it, hipness and its extreme embodiment in the hipster defy easy explanation and by their very nature subvert attempts at stable definition, a point that will become increasingly important to this study and help to establish this figure’s role within and without American society. Finally, the hipster label as I will define it in the first chapter offers a more fitting umbrella under which to place the comedians studied here because its evolution from the early twentieth-century to the early twenty-first is intertwined with the intellectual, comic, economic, and technological evolutions of American society during that time in a way that “trickster” is not. The hipster as a stand-up persona is closely related to the hipster as a social phenomenon and is thus linked to society’s development in the late twentieth and early twenty-first- centuries. This interconnectedness of the hipster figure to its contemporary society heavily informs my analysis of early hipster comedians Lenny Bruce and Richard Pryor and contemporary hipster comedians Bo Burnham and Aziz Ansari. Through this 2 For a detailed exploration of traditional theories of laughter and humor including primary materials and secondary commentary, see John Morreall’s The Philosophy of Laughter and Humor. Morreall provides the foundational texts of the three major theories of comedy in Western thought: the Superiority Theory, the Relief Theory, and the Incongruity Theory. While each of these theories and their various particular iterations succeeds in explaining some instances of comedy, none is capable of encapsulating all humor and the student of comedy is better served thinking of comedy for its inability to be succinctly defined than under the umbrella of any one theory. Contemporary thinkers like Simon Critchley and Michael North offer theories of humor as an intellectual stance in which humorist and audience alike express, through comedy, awareness of the ineffable multiplicity of all life and all attempts to define it in clean and easy terms. These latter arguments will form much of the basis of my work here as it develops in the following pages, but for now they suggest that humor, like hipness as I will define it in the next chapter, becomes less clearly identifiable the closer one looks at it. 3
Description: