Title Pages a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by license, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reproduction rights organization. Inquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above. You must not circulate this work in any other form and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer. CIP data is on file at the Library of Congress ISBN 978–0–19–005386–4 1 3 5 7 9 8 6 4 2 Printed by Sheridan Books, Inc., United States of America Access brought to you by: Page 2 of 2 PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. Subscriber: OUP-Reference Gratis Access; date: 07 October 2019 Acknowledgments I am grateful to my family for their love that is and always was everything to me. Most of all, I thank my husband Roy for his support and for being there for me in all the happy as well as painful moments that accompanied my writing. (p.x) Without his love this book would not have been possible. To my children who listened to the story of Philoctetes at bedtime so many times: I thank Ori for our conversations and her beautiful questions, Adam for his unique sensitivity and ability to make me laugh also in painful moments, and Yotam whose insights about empathy accompany this book. The work was written amid many conversations with Werner Hamacher. I am grateful for his attention, generosity, and belief in the project. Werner passed away just a few months before the manuscript was completed and our last meeting was devoted to discussing its final details. It is a great sadness that he did not live to see it in print. This book is dedicated to him. Access brought to you by: Page 2 of 2 PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. Subscriber: OUP-Reference Gratis Access; date: 07 October 2019 Abbreviations Abhandlung über den Ursprung der Sprache. In Werke: Bd. 1: Frühe Schriften 1764–1772, ed. Urich Gaier, 697–810. Deutscher Klassiker Verlag, 1985. Treatise “Treatise on the Origin of Language.” In Philosophical Writings, trans. and ed. Michael N. Forster, 65–164. Cambridge University Press, 2002. Versions of Philoctetes Gide, Philoc. André Gide. “Philoctetes; or, the Treatise on Three Ethics.” In Philoctetes and the Fall of Troy: Documents, Iconography, Interpretations, ed. and trans. Oscar Mandel, 158–178. University of Nebraska Press, 1981. Herder, Philoc. Johann Gottfried Herder. “Philoktetes: Szenen mit Gesang.” In Nachlaß veröffentlicht, Sämmtliche Werke. [Abt.] Zur schönen Literatur und Kunst 6. Theil, ed. J. G. Herder, 113–126. Cotta, 1806. Müller, Philoc. Heiner Müller. “Philoctetes.” In Philoctetes and the Fall of Troy, trans. Oscar Mandel in collaboration with Maria Kelsen Feder, 222–250. University of Nebraska Press, 1981. Sophocles, Philoc. Sophocles. Philoctetes. trans. Hugh Lloyd-Jones. Loeb Classical Library. Harvard University Press, 1998. Work by Rousseau Essay “Essay on the Origin of Languages.” In Essay on the Origin of Languages and Writings Related to Music (Collected Writings of Rousseau, vol. 7), trans. and ed. John T. Scott, 247–299. University Press of New England, 1998. Access brought to you by: Page 2 of 2 PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. Subscriber: OUP-Reference Gratis Access; date: 07 October 2019 On Pain and the Origin of Language fully expressed in language, something we can never entirely communicate or share with others. Its unmediated nature tends to be deemed private, inasmuch as any attempt to articulate it publicly is doomed to fail. Along these lines, language seems to be everything that pain is not. Its underlying principles are those of shareability, communication, and various forms of the self’s extension into the world and toward others. Regardless of our theoretical orientation toward language—whether analytical, continental, or logical—this configuration of language, and the various ways by which it refers, represents, expresses, and communicates, is common to them all. Language not only challenges the private and solipsistic structure of pain, but it also constitutes itself as inherently distinct from everything that is of-the- body, somatic, or nonsymbolic. In this sense, physical pain and the body as such must be overcome in order for language to emerge. If the emergence of language marks humans’ departure from the bestial, then the violence and intensity of cries of pain are precisely what can turn us back into animals, or at least—momentarily—expose the animality that saturates our linguistic being. Language Pangs challenges these already familiar conceptions and proposes a reconsideration of the relationship between pain and language in terms of an essential interconnectedness rather than the common exclusive opposition. My premise is both that we cannot truly penetrate the experience of pain without taking account of its inherent relation to language, and, vice versa, that the nature of language essentially depends on our understanding of its inherent (p. 2) relationship with pain. I question the assumption that the experience of pain puts a basic limit to our linguistic abilities, neutralizing us as linguistic beings. On the contrary, the exploration of the nature and origins of language reveals a very strong kinship to pain. It is therefore necessary to shift away from considering this relationship in terms of essential rivalry and opposition and turn toward a notion of inherent interconnection and profound intimacy between pain and language, an abiding intimacy. Although it might be irrefutable that in states of extreme pain, language seems to crumble or collapse, depriving us of words, considering this characterization in itself is problematic and partial, stemming perhaps from the way in which pain and language are conceptualized and defined in the first place. Although I concentrate mainly on physical and not psychic pain or suffering, my discussion is not limited to the physical aspects and implications of pain (if it is at all possible to treat pain as having merely physical implications). The prevalent use of the word “pain” in the context of mental suffering (the pain of loss, longing, or even love) reveals the kinship between physical and mental pain. It is moreover difficult, perhaps impossible, to find philosophical discussions of physical pain that do not “spill over” into its mental, psychological effects. Discussions that remain within the boundaries of the merely physical aspects of pain are, generally speaking, disciplinary and therefore rather limited Page 2 of 28 PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. Subscriber: OUP-Reference Gratis Access; date: 07 October 2019