Land Use Law & Zoning Digest 1994: Vol 46 Index

25 Pages·1994·10.4 MB·English

Judicial Decisions
Bankoff v. Board of Adjustment (Okla.),
Author Index to Case Number Index 334
Commentary and Bannum, Inc. v. City of St. Charles (U.S.
ZD No. 1 1-32 App., 8th Cir.), 79
Case Comments ZD No. 2 33-65 Barnes, State ex rel., v. Hunter (Mo. App.),
ZD No. 3 66-99 324
Berger, Michael M., “Nollan Meets Dolan ZD No. 4 100-134 Battaglia Properties, Ltd. v. Florida Land
Rollin’ Down the Bikepath” (Commen- ZD No.5 135-170 and Water Adjudicatory Comm’n (Fla.
tary), No. 2 at 3. ZD No. 6 171-208 App.), 180
Berger, Michael M., “Not Always Right to ZD No. 7 209-242 Baugh v. City of Milwaukee (U.S. trial,
Try to Get As Much As You Can” (Com- ZD No. 8 243-275 E.D. Wis.), 65
mentary), No. 7 at 4. ZD No. 9 276-312 Beatty v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer Dist.
Blaesser, Brian W., “New Federal Wetlands ZD No. 10 313-345 (Mo.), 323
Policy: The Landowner’s Perspective” ZD No. 11 346-384 Beck v. Springfield Township Bd. of Zon-
(Commentary), No. 1 at 3. ing Appeals (Ohio App.), 162
Bosselman, Fred, “The Douglas Commis- Bellefonte Land Inc. v. Bellefonte (Ky. App.),
sion Remembered” (Commentary), No. 147
3 at3. Case Name Index Bennett v. Sullivan’s Island Bd. of Adjust-
Callies, David L., “After Nollan: Dolan v. ment (S.C. App.), 270
City of Tigard” (Commentary), No. 2 at 4. A Bishop Nursing Home, Inc. v. Zoning Hear-
Callies, David L., “Nexus Redux on Re- AAK, Inc. v. City of Woonsocket (U.S. trial, ing Bd. (Pa.App.), 306
quired Land Dedications” (Commentary), R.L.), 201 Board of Adjustment v. Town of Swansboro
No. 7 at 3. Acquisition of Billboard Leases and Ease- (N.C.), 84
Freilich, Robert H., and Doyle, RoxAnne, ments, In re, (Mich. App.), 364 Board of County Comm'rs v. Martin (Colo.
“Taking Legislation: Misguided and Dan- Adams, County of, v. Romeo (Wis. App.), App.), 37
gerous” (Commentary), No. 10 at 3. 207 Board of County Comm'rs v. Snyder (Fla.),
Kelly, Eric Damian, “Nollan, Lucas, and Adkins v. Board of Appeals (N.Y. App.), 181
Dolan: Respecting Expectations” (Com- 226 Board of Zoning Adjustment v. Murphy
mentary), No. 2 at 5. Aguirre v. Lee (Cal. App.), 138 (Ga. App.), 249
Kelly, Eric Damian, “Supreme Court Strikes Akron, Borough of, v. Hollinger (Pa. App.), Borough of Akron v. Hollinger (Pa. App.),
Middle Ground on Exactions Test” (Com- 233 233
mentary), No. 7 at 6. Albany, City of, v. Feignenbaum (N.Y. Boston, City of, v. Back Bay Cultural Ass’n
Larsen, Wendy U., and Larsen, Marcella, App.), 367 (Mass.), 363
“Moratoria as Takings Under Lucas” Alexanderson v. Clackamas County (Ore. Boulder City v. Cinnamon Hills Assoc.
(Commentary), No. 6 at 3. App.), 267 (Nev.), 294
Mandelker, Daniel R., “Zoning Discrimi- American Waste & Pollution Control Co. Bowling Green, City of, v. Cooksey (Ky.
nation Against Group Homes Under the v. St. Martin Parish Police Jury (La.), 184 App.),5
Fair Housing Act” (Commentary), No. Anderson v. Douglas County (U.S. App., Brady Dev. Co. v. Town of Hilton Head
11 at 3. 8th Cir.), 187 Island (S.C.), 202
Meck, Stuart, “Newsracks: Regulate with Annand v. Board of Supervisors (Pa. App), Bravo Vending v. City of Rancho Mirage
Caution” (Case Comments), No. 1 at 21. 235 (Cal. App.), 35
Morgan, Terry D., “Exactions as Takings: Anthony v. Town of Brookhaven (N.Y. Bright Dev. v. City of Tracy (Cal. App.), 140
Tactics for Dealing with Dolan” (Com- App.), 16 Brookhaven, Town of, v. Spadaro (N.Y.
mentary), No. 9 at 3. Appeal of Gregor (Pa. App.), 25 App.), 372
Schindler, Kurt H., “Lessons from New Appeal of Miller and Son Paving (Pa. App.), Brown v. Town of Davidson (N.C. App.),
Zealand’s Land-Use Laws” (Commen- 337 230
tary), No. 8 at 3. Application of Rouse & Assoc. Ship Road Brown v. Lowell Mining Co. (Ind. App.),
Tarlock, A. Dan, “Local Government Pro- Land Ltd. Partnership, In re (Pa. App.), 359
tection of Diversity: What Is Its Niche?” 339 Budco Theatres v. Zoning Hearing Bd. (Pa.
(Commentary), No. 4 at 3. Aranosian Oil Co. v. City of Portsmouth App.), 129
Weinstein, Alan C., “Courts Take Close (N.H.), 50 Buford, City of, v. Ward (Ga. App.), 284
Look at Adult Use Regs” (Commentary), Arens v. City of St. Louis (Mo. App.), 293 Bukaka, Inc. v. County of Benton (U.S.
No. 5at3. Armour and Co. v. Inver Grove Heights trial), 322
(U.S. App., 8th Cir.), 47 Bullard v. Lake County Code Enforcement
Asselin v. Town of Conway (N.H.), 51 Bd. (Fla. App.), 41
Associated Students of the Univ. of Mon-
tana v. City of Missoula (Mont.), 156 C
West Reporter Citations Ayers v. Board of Adjustment (N.C. App.), C.B.H. Properties Inc. v. Rose (N.Y. App),
231 374
46 ZD 61 635 A.2d 612 C.LC. Corp. v. Township of East Brunswick
46 ZD 221 114S.Ct. 2038 B (N.J. App), 120
46 ZD 232 114S.Ct. 2309 B Street Commons, Inc. v. Board of County California Country Club Homes Ass’n v.
Comm'rs (U.S. trial), 248 City of Los Angeles (Cal. App.), 102
BAC, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors (Pa.), Campbell v. City Council (Mass.), 46
234 Caprari v. Town of Colesville (N.Y. App.),
Baldassare v. Planning Bd. (N.Y. App.), 261 225
Bank of Waukegan v. Village of Vernon Car Spa, Inc. v. High Tech of S & C (NJ.
Hills (Ill. App.), 318 App.), 122
Land Use Law December 1994 3
indexes
Cardinale v. Ottawa Regional Planning Communications Properties v. County of Eccles v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals (N.Y. App.),
Comm'n (Ohio App.), 332 Steele (Minn. App.), 116 228
Carman v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment (Pa. Community Concerned Citizens, Inc. v. Edward Kraemer & Sons, Inc. v. Sauk
App.), 308 Union Township Bd. of Zoning Appeals County Bd. of Adjustment (Wis. App.),
Centex Real Estate Corp. v. City of Vallejo (Ohio), 21 32
(Cal. App.), 67 Concerned Citizens of Brentwood v. Dis- Ehrlich v. City of Culver City (Cal. App.),
Chesapeake B & M v. Harford County (U.S. trict of Columbia Bd. of Zoning Adjust- 137
trial, Md.), 111 ment (D.C. App.), 142 Erickson & Assoc. v. McLerran (Wash.),
Childress, State ex rel., v.A nderson (Mo. Connecticut Resources Recovery Author- 311
App.), 155 ity v. Planning and Zoning Comm'n Eugene, City of, v. Miller (Ore.), 304
Chrysler Realty Corp. v.Oneck (N.Y. App.), (Conn.), 40 Eugene, City of, v. Miller (Ore. App.), 163
19 Cope v. City of Cannon Beach (Ore.), 60 Everett v. City of Tallahassee (US. trial,
Chuilli v. Town of Putnam Valley (N.Y. Copeland v. City of Chattanooga (Tenn. Fla.), 214
App.), 12 App.), 237 Ex Parte Pine Brook Lakes, Inc. (Ga.), 4
Citizens Assn. of Georgetown v. District of Corn v. City of Lauderdale Lakes (U.S.
Columbia Bd. of Zoning Adjustment App., 11th Cir.), 42 F
(D.C.), 357 County of Adams v. Romeo (Wis. App.), Farrington Close Condominium Bd. of
Citizens’ Awareness Now v. Marakis (Utah), 207 Managers, In re, v. Incorporated Village
343 County of Venango v. Borough of Sugar- of Southampton (N.Y. App.), 329
City of Albany v. Feignenbaum (N.Y. App.), creek Zoning Hearing Bd. (Pa.), 95 Feriozzi Co. v. City of Atlantic City (N_J.
367 trial), 80
City of Boston v. Back Bay Cultural Ass’n D Fine v. Town of Hempstead (N.Y. App.),
(Mass.), 363 Dallas / Fort Worth Int'l Airport Bd. v. City 229
City of Bowling Green v. Cooksey (Ky. of Irving (Tex. App.), 167 Firstbank Co. v. City of Springfield (Ill.
App.),5 Danis Montco Landfill Co. v. Jefferson App.), 286
City of Buford v. Ward (Ga. App.), 284 Township Zoning Comm'n (Ohio App.), 515 Associates v. City of Newark (N.J.),
City of Dellwood v. Lattimore (Mo. App.), 85 11
49 Davenport v. City of Tigard (Ore. App.), Flavell v. City of Albany (Cal. App.), 100
City of Eugene v. Miller (Ore. App.), 163 91 Forty Mill Realty Venture v. Missouri (Mo.
City of Eugene v. Miller (Ore.), 304 Davis v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment (Tex.), App.), 292
City of Hampton v. Briscoe (Ga. App.), 43 204 Foster, State ex rel., v. City of Morgantown
City of Huntingburg v. Phoenix Natural Davis-Kidd Booksellers v. McWherter (W.Va.), 31
Resources (Ind. App.), 217 (Tenn.), 236 4900 Vets Corp. v. Scheyer (N.Y. App.),
City of Irvine v. Irvine Citizens Against D’Emilio v. Board of Supervisors (Pa. App.), 161
Overdevelopment (Cal. App.), 352 92 Freeburg v. City of Seattle (Wash. App.),
City of Ladue v. Gilleo (U.S.), 221 Deberandis v. Zoning Comm’n (Conn.), 99
City of Miami Beach v. Galbut (Fla.), 143 355 Freeport, Town of, v. Ocean Farms of Maine
City of New York v. Shakespeare (N.Y. Dellinger v. City of Charlotte (N.C. App.), (Me.), 150
App.), 297 302 Frick v. City of New Orleans Dept. of Safety
City of Orange Beach v. Perdido Pass De- Dellwood, City of, v. Lattimore (Mo. App.), and Permits (La. App.), 185
velopers (Ala.), 276 49 Friends of the Law v. King County
City of Phoenix v. Clauss (Ariz. App.), 243 Department of Transp. v. Weisenfeld (Fla. (Wash.), 274
City of St. Joseph v. Preferred Family App.), 144 Fromer v. Two Hundred Post Assoc. (Conn.
Healthcare (Mo. App.), 154 Desmond v. County of Contra Costa (Cal. App.), 141
City of Springdale v. CSX Railway Corpo- App.), 279
ration (Ohio), 333 DiBlasi v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals (Conn.), G
City of Wapello v. Chaplin (lowa App.), 39 Gagliardi v. Village of Pawling (U.S. App.
110 DiStefano v. Town of Stoughton (Mass. 2d Cir.), 296
City of Woonsocket v. Forte Brothers, Inc. App.), 321 Gamble v. Eau Claire County (U.S. App.,
(R.L.), 341 Distributec, Inc. v. New Jersey Dept. of 7th Cir.), 134
Clackamas County v. Marson (Ore. App.), Envtl. Protection and Energy (N.J. App.), Gardner v. City of Baltimore Mayor and
335 366 City Council (U.S. App., 4th Cir.), 7
Cleveland Area Bd. of Realtors v. City of District of Columbia v. Wical Ltd. Partner- Garrity v. Morrisville Zoning Bd. of Ad-
Euclid (U.S. trial, N.D. Ohio), 126 ship (D.C. App.), 70 justment (N.C. App.), 376
Clinton County Solid Waste Auth. v. Wayne Dodd v. Hood River County (Ore.), 59 Gemtel Corp. v.Community Redev. Agency
Township (Pa. App.), 382 Dolan v. City of Tigard (Ore.), 22 (U.S. App.), 315
Coats v. City of Cripple Creek (Colo. App.), Dolan v. City of Tigard (U.S.), 232 Gerrish Township v. Esber (Mich. App.),
212 Downriver Plaza Group v. City of Southgate 113
Cohen v. City of Des Plaines (U.S. App., (Mich.), 290 Giambrone v. City of Aurora (Ohio App.),
7th Cir.), 108 Doylestown Township v. Teeling (Pa. App.), 57
Cohen v. Vecchio (N.Y. App.), 123 336 Golden Gate Hotel Ass’n v. City and
Cohen v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals (Mass. Dyches v. McCorkle (Ga. App.), 283 County of San Francisco (U.S. trial, Cal.),
App.), 152 101
Collier v. City of Tacoma (Wash.), 30 E Golden State Homebuilding Assoc. v. City
Collins v. Lonergan (N.Y. App.), 158 Earth Movers of Fairbanks v. Fairbanks of Modesto (Cal. App.), 351
Commonwealth v. Rogers (Pa. App.), 164 North Star Borough (Alaska), 172 Graff v. City of Chicago (U.S. App., 7th
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. East Greenwich, Town of, v. O'Neill Cir.), 107
Harchelroad (Pa. App.), 62 (R.L.), 26 Gregor, Appeal of, (Pa. App.), 25
4 December 1994 Land Use Law
Judicial Decisions
Grand Brittain, Inc. v. City of Amarillo J Levada v. Board of Zoning Appeals (N.Y.
(U.S. App., 5th Cir.), 383 J.C. Reeves Corp. v. Sherwood Educ. Dist. App.), 223
Greenberg v. DiBiase (Me.), 255 (Ore. App.), 266 Levald, Inc. v. City of Palm Desert (U.S.
Jago-Ford v. Planning and Zoning Comm'n App., 9th Cir.), 36
H (Conn. App.), 356 Lindsay v. City of Philadelphia (U.S. trial),
HWK, Inc. v. County of Kendall (Ill. App.), Jaworski v. Earth Removal Bd. (Mass. App.), 268, 269
146 288 Littlejohn v. City of N. Chicago (Ill. App.),
Hampton, City of, v. Briscoe (Ga. App.), 43 Jordan’s Partners v. Goehringer (N.Y. App.), 287
Hansel v. City of Keene (N.H.), 191 370 Lopes v. City of Peabody (Mass.), 289
Harp Advertising Illinois v. Village of Chi- Jurkiewicz v. Butler County Bd. of Elec- Lyons, Town of, v. Bashor (Colo. App.),
cago Ridge (U.S. App.), 109 tions (Ohio App.), 88 280
Harris v. City of Costa Mesa (Cal. App.),
348 K M
Harris Bank of Hinsdale v. County of “K” Care, Inc. v. Town of Lac du Flambeau McArthur, State ex rel., v. Board of Adjust-
Kendall (Ill. App.), 251 (Wis. App.), 208 ment (Mo. App.), 291
Harrison, Township of, v. Smith (Pa. App.), Kamp v. Stebens (Iowa App.), 320 McCusky v. Canyon County (Idaho), 145
340 Karatinos v. Town of Juno Beach (Fla. App.), McKay Creek Valley Ass’n v. Washington.
Hawaii's Thousand Friends v. City and 72 County (Ore. App.), 23
County of Honolulu (Hawaii), 73 Kaufman & Board Cent. Valley v. City of Macedonian Orthodox Church v. Planning
Heintz v. Edwards (N.Y. App.), 227 Modesto (Cal. App.), 350 Bd. (N.J. App.), 327
Helm v. Citizens to Protect Prospect Area Kawaoka v. City of Arroyo Grande (U.S. Maidencreek, Township of, v. Stutzman
(Ky. App.), 148 trial, Cal.), 33 (Pa. App.), 379
Henry v. Board of Appeals (Mass. App.), Kelley Property Dev. v. Town of Lebanon Manhattan Sepulveda, Ltd. v. City of Man-
219 (Conn.), 103 hattan Beach (Cal. App.), 246
Hess Realty Corp. v. Planning Comm’n Kelly v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency Mann v. Lower Makefield Township (Pa.
(N.Y. App.), 124 (Nev.), 118 App.), 199
Hill v. Zoning Hearing Bd. (Pa.), 94 Kern County Farm Bureau v. County of Markowitz, In re, v. Town Bd. (N.Y. App.),
Hilltop Terrace Homeowner's Ass'n v. Is- Kern (Cal. App.), 68 331
land County (Wash. App.), 169 Kirkland v. Planning Comm’n (Ala. App.), Martin v. Zoning Hearing Bd. (Pa. App.), 93
Hirsch v. Zoning Hearing Bd. (Pa. App.), 313 Marx v. Planning Bd. (N.Y. App.), 54
307 Kirsch v. Prince George’s County (Md. Matthews v. Shelby County Comm’n (Ala.
Historic Charleston Found. v. Krawcheck App.), 44 App.), 136
(S.C.), 309 Klein v. Council of City of Pittsburgh (Pa. Memory Gardens Cemetery v. Village of
Hodge, State ex rel, v. Turtle Lake (Wis.), App.), 378 Arlington Heights (Ill. App.), 74
133 Klein v. Shadyside Health, Educ. and Re- Menkhus, State ex rel., v. City of Pevely
Hoke v. Moyer (Wyo.), 275 search Corp. (Pa. App.), 381 (Mo. App.), 190
Holmberg v. City of Ramsey (U.S. App., Kline v. Bernardsville Association (N.J. Metropolitan Outdoor Advertising Corp.
8th Cir.), 256 App.), 82 v. City of Santa Ana (Cal. App.), 247
Home Builders Ass’n of Cent. Arizona v. Kmart Corp., State ex rel., v. City of Westlake Miami Beach, City of, v. Galbut (Fla.), 143
City of Scottsdale (Ariz.), 347 Planning Comm'n (Ohio), 196 Michiels v. Fulton County (Ga.), 3
Home Builders Ass’n of Greater St. Louis Knipple v. Geistown Borough Zoning Hear- Midland Enters. v. City of Elmhurst (IIl.
v. City of St. Peters (Mo. App.), 189 ing Bd. (Pa. App.), 165 App.), 182
Howell v. City of New Orleans (U.S. trial), Knudtson v. City of Coates (Minn. App.), Miller and Son Paving, Appeal of, (Pa.
254 114 App.), 337
Huntingburg, City of, v. Phoenix Natural Krisnathevin v. Board of Zoning Appeals Mobile Home Village, Inc. v. Mayor and
Resources (Ind. App.), 217 (Va.), 29 Council (N.J. App.), 157
Hy Kom Dev. Co. v. Manatee County (U.S. Kudloff v. City of Billings (Mont.), 117 Montgomery County v. Waters Landing
trial, Fla.), 178 Ltd. Partnership (Md. App.), 151
L Moody Hill Farms Inc. v. Zoning Bd. of
I L.M. Everhart Construction v. Jefferson Appeals (N.Y. App.), 260
ILQ Investments v. City of Rochester (U.S. County Planning Comm’n (U.S. App., Moore v. Board of Adjustment (N.C. App.),
App., 8th Cir.), 365 4th Cir.), 64 195
In re Acquisition of Billboard Leases and Ladue, City of, v. Gilleo (U.S.), 221 Moorman v. Department of Community
Easements (Mich. App.), 364 Laird v. Town of Montezuma (N.Y. App.), Affairs (Fla. App.), 213
In re Application of Rouse & Assoc. Ship 18 Morehart v. County of Santa Barbara (Cal.),
Road Land Ltd. Partnership (Pa. App.), Lakeside Imports, Inc. v. State (La.), 361 317
339 Lancaster Redevelopment Agency v. Dibley Moroney v. Mayor and Council (N.J. App.),
In re Barlow (Vt.), 131 (Cal. App.), 211 259
In re Farrington Close Condominium Bd. Larson v. Multnomah County (Ore. App.), Multimedia Publishing Co. of S. Carolina
of Managers v. Incorporated Village of 90 v. Greenville-Spartanburg Airport Dist.
Southampton (N.Y. App.), 329 Leavitt v. Jefferson County (Wash. App.), (U.S. App., 4th Cir.), 27
In re Markowitz v. Town Bd. (N.Y. App.), 345 Murphy v. Kotlik (Mass. App.), 10
331 Leblanc-Sternberg v. Fletcher (U.S. trial), Murray v. Columbia River Gorge Comm’n
In re Rudey v. Landmarks Preservation 298 (Ore. App.), 197
Comm’n (N.Y.), 330 Leisure Time Billiards v. Rose (N.Y. App.),
In re Rusin (Vt.), 384 263 N
Irvine, City of, v. Irvine Citizens Against Leo Fedus and Sons Constr. Co. v. Zoning National Paint and Coatings Ass’n v. City
Overdevelopment (Cal. App.), 352 Bd. of Appeals (Conn.), 38 of Chicago (U.S. trial IIl.), 106
Land Use Law December 1994 5
\
Indgres—_
Neill v. Bedminster Township Bd. of Su- Pinnock v. Internation House +e m Shubert Org., Inc. v. Landmarks Preserva-
pervisors (Pa. App.), 200 cakes Franchisee (U.S. jal), 245 son Comm'n (N.Y. App.), 55
Nelson v. Carlson (Cal. App.), 34 Pius v. Suffolk County SierraSb v. Department of Forestry and
New Hampshire Motor Transport Ass'n v. Servs. (N.Y. App.), 193 Fire Proté@n (Cal. App.), 174
Town of Plaistow (U.S. trial, N.H.), 119 Polk v. Edwards (La.), 218 Simpkins v. City"Saaffney (S.C. App.), 28
New Jersey Coalition Against War in the Potomac Greens Associates Pa Simpson v. City of CR&aatte (N.C. App),
Middle East v. J.M.B. Realty Corp (N.J. City Council (U.S. App., Va.), 303
App.), 81 Potomac Group Home Corp. v. M Smith & Lee Assoc. v. City of ‘aye (U.S.
New York, City of, v. Shakespeare (N.Y. ery County (U.S. trial, D. Md.), 4 App., 6th Cir.), 220
App.), 297 Prince George’s County v. Sunrise Smith v. State (Tex. App), 238
New York State Ass’n of Realtors v. Shaffer Limited Partnership (Md. App.), 9 South Anchorage Concerned Coalition v.
(U.S. trial), 262 Coffey (Alaska), 171
New York Telephone Co. v. City of R |a Sparks v. Douglas County (Wash. App.),
Amsterdam (N.Y. App.), 369 R.A. Putnam and Assoc. v. City of Mendota 240
Newton Grove, Town of, v. Sutton (N.C. Heights (Minn. App.), 188 ~ Springdale, City of, v. CSX Railway Corp.
App.), 125 R/L Assoc. v. City of Seattle (Wash. App.), (Ohio), 333
Non-Profit Affordable Housing Network 272 Star Enterprise v. Pitts (N.Y. App.), 299
of New Jersey v. New Jersey Council on Racich v. County of Boone (Ill. App.), 253 Star Enterprise v. Wilder (N.J. App.), 258
Affordable Housing (N.J. App.), 53 Ramona Convent of the Holy Names v. State v. Castellano (Minn. App.), 115
Norquest/RCA-W Bitter Lake Partnership City of Alhambra (Cal. App.), 175 State v. Miccosukee Village Shopping Center
v. City of Seattle (Wash. App.), 239 Reel Pipe & Valve Co. v. Consolidated (Fla. App.), 71
City of Indianapolis-Marion County (Ind. State Dept. of Transp. v. Altimus (Ore.
O App.), 360 App.), 198
OS Advertising Co. of Georgia v. Rubin Reed-Custer Community Unit School Dist. State ex rel. Barnes v. Hunter (Mo. App.),
(Ga.), 215 v. City of Wilmington (Ill. App.), 216 324
O'Keefe v. Donovan (N.Y. App.), 300 Restigouche v. Town of Jupiter (U.S. trial), State ex rel. Childress v. Anderson (Mo.
O’Mara v. Douglas County (Ore. App.), 89 282 App.), 155
Oakman v. Town of Florence (Miss.), 78 Revere Nat'l Corp. v. Prince George’s State ex rel. Foster v. City of Morgantown
Ojavan Investors v. California Coastal County, (U.S. trial, Md.), 8 (W.Va.), 31
Comm'n (Cal. App.), 349 River Park v. City of Highland Park (U.S. State ex rel. Hamilton v. Clinton County
Old Tuckaway Assoc. Ltd. Partnership v. App.), 319 Bd. of Elections (Ohio), 87
City of Greenfield (Wis. App.), 242 Riverhead, Town of, v. New York State State ex rel. Hodge v. Turtle Lake (Wis.),
Oliver Constr. Co. v. Village of Villa Park Dept. of Envtl. Conservation (N.Y. App.), 133
(Ill. App.), 285 160 State ex rel. Kmart Corp. v. City of Westlake
Olon v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Rockford Blacktop Constr. Co. v. Boone Planning Comm'n (Ohio), 196
(Pa.), 63 County (Ill. App.), 358 State ex rel. McArthur v. Board of Adjust-
11126 Baltimore Blvd., Inc. v. Prince George’s Rockland Properties v. Town of Brookhaven ment (Mo. App.), 291
County (U.S. trial, Md.), 112 (N.Y. App.), 375 State ex rel. Menkhus v. City of Pevely
Oneida County v. Converse (Wis.), 241 Rudey, In re, v. Landmarks Preservation (Mo. App.), 190
Orange Beach, City of, v. Perdido Pass Comm'n (N.Y.), 330 State ex rel. Zonders v. Delaware County
Developers (Ala.), 276 Rusin, In re, (Vt.), 384 Bd. of Elections (Ohio), 264
Oxford House-C v. City of St. Louis (U.S. Russell Minerals Fayette, Inc. v. Zoning Steadham v. Board of Zoning Adjustment
trial), 257 Hearing Bd. (Pa. App.), 166 (Ala.), 209
Oxford House, Inc. v. Town of Babylon Strucker v. Summit County (Utah App.),
(U.S. trial, N.Y.), 13 S 271
St. Charles, Parish of, v. Frickey (La. App.), Sturbridge, Town of, v. McDowell (Mass.
P 362 App.), 186
Parker v. Board of County Comm'rs (Fla.), St. Joseph, City of, v. Preferred Family
179 Healthcare (Mo. App.), 154 T
Parish ofJ efferson v. Jacobs (La. App.), 149 St. Louis County v. Taggert (Mo. App.), TBCH v. City of Albuquerque (N.M. App.),
Parish of St. Charles v. Frickey (La. App.), 153 328
362 Saad v. City of Berkeley (Cal. App.), 314 TK’s Video, Inc. v. Denton County (U.S.
Patrick Media Group v. City of Clearwater Saladino v. Fernan (N.Y. App.), 371 App.), 342
(U.S. trial, Fla.), 104 Save Elkhart Lake v. Village of Elkhart Tabb Lakes Ltd. v. United States (U.S. App.),
Penilyn Lands v. Board of Supervisors (Pa. Lake (Wis. App.), 312 205
App.), 380 Save Our State Park v. Board of Clallam Tahoe Keys Property Owners’ Assn. v. State
People v. Graham (N.Y. trial), 56 County Comm’rs (Wash. App.), 344 Water Resources Control Bd. (Cal. App.),
People v. Scott (Cal. App.), 176 Schnider v. County of San Diego (U.S. App., 316
People v. Smith (N.Y. trial), 368 9th Cir.), 353 Tanana Oil Corp. v. Town Bd. (N.Y. App.),
Petersen v. City of Clemson (S.C. App.), Seiler v. City of Granite City (Ill. App.), 252 373
203 Sekuterski v. Village of Lancaster (N.Y. Taylor v. Board of County Comm'rs (Idaho
Philm Corp. v. Washington Township (Pa. App.), 301 App.), 105
App.), 305 Shank v. Town of Dryden (N.Y. App.), 20 Teachers Ins. and Annuity Ass’n of America
Phoenix, City of, v. Clauss (Ariz. App.), 243 Sharp v. Zoning Hearing Bd. (Pa. App.), 96 v. City of New York (N.Y.), 159
Pierce v. Northeast Lake Washington Sewer Sheridan Race Car Ass’n v. Rice Ranch Thoma v. Planning and Zoning Comm'n
and Water Dist. (Wash.), 273 (Wyo.), 170 (Conn. App.), 1
Pine Tree Telephone and Telegraph Co. v. Sherman v. Dayton Bd. of Zoning Appeals Thoma v. Planning and Zoning Comm’n
Town of Gray (Me.), 77 (Ohio App.), 86 (Conn.), 281
6 December 1994 Land Use Law
Judicial Decisions
Tinicum Township v. Tinicum Township Wapello, City of, v. Chaplin (lowa App.), White’s Excavation and Constr. Co. v. Board
Zoning Hearing Bd. (Pa. App.), 24 110 of Zoning Adjustments (Ala. App.), 346
Tire America, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing Bd. Warren v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals (Ill. App.),
(Pa. App.), 128 250 ALASKA
Tobe v. City of Santa Ana (Cal. App.), 210 Washington v. City of Winchester (Ky. Earth Movers of Fairbanks v. Fairbanks
Town of Brookhaven v. Spadaro(N.Y. App.), App.), 183 North Star Borough (Alaska), 172
372 Weichert Ad & P Inc. v. Department of South Anchorage Concerned Coalition v.
Town of East Greenwich v. O'Neill (R.I.), 26 Transp. (Pa. App.), 127 Coffey (Alaska), 171
Town of Freeport v. Ocean Farms of Maine West 97th-98th Streets Block Ass’n v. Vol- Zerbertz v. Municipality of Anchorage
(Me.), 150 unteers of America of Greater New York (Alaska), 66
Town of Lyons v. Bashor (Colo. App.), 280 (N.Y. App.), 14
Town of Newton Grove v. Sutton (N.C. Whitehead Oil Co. v. City of Lincoln (Neb.), ARIZONA
App.), 125 325, 326 City of Phoenix v. Clauss (Ariz. App.), 243
Town of Riverhead v. New York State Dept. White’s Excavation and Constr. Co. v. Board Home Builders Ass’n of Cent. Arizona v.
of Envtl. Conservation (N.Y. App.), 160 of Zoning Adjustments (Ala. App.), 346 City of Scottsdale (Ariz.), 347
Town of Sturbridge v. McDowell (Mass. Wiederspiel v. Leifeld (N.Y. App.), 121
App.), 186 Wilkinson v. Board of County Comm’rs CALIFORNIA
Township of Harrison v. Smith (Pa. App.), (Colo. App.), 354 Aguirre v. Lee (Cal. App.), 138
340 Wilson v. City of Seattle (Wash.), 168 Bravo Vending v. City of Rancho Mirage
Township of Maidencreek v. Stutzman (Pa. Wnuk v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals (Conn.), 2 (Cal. App.), 35
App.), 379 Woodcreek Land Ltd. Partnerships v. City Bright Dev. v. City of Tracy (Cal. App.),
Trail Mining, Inc. v. Village of Sun (La. of Puyallup (Wash. App.), 206 140
App.), 6 Woodstock, Village of, v. Bahramian (Vt.), California Country Club Homes Ass’n v.
Transamerica Realty Services Inc. v. Cali- 130 City of Los Angeles (Cal. App.), 102
fornia Coastal Comm’n (Cal. App.), 244 Woonsocket, City of, v. Forte Brothers, Inc. Centex Real Estate Corp. v. City of Vallejo
Transportation Alternatives, Inc. v. (R.L.), 341 (Cal. App.), 67
Gotbaum (N.Y. App.), 224 Wyzykowski v. Rizas (N.J.), 52 City of Irvine v. Irvine Citizens Against
Traverso v. People ex. rel. Department of Overdevelopment (Cal. App.), 352
Transp. (Cal.), 139 X Desmond v. County of Contra Costa (Cal.
Triomphe Investors v. City of Northwood Xiloj-Itzep v. City of Agoura Hills (Cal. App.), 279
(U.S. trial), 265 App.), 278 Ehrlich v. City of Culver City (Cal. App.),
137
U Y Flavell v. City of Albany (Cal. App.), 100
Unification Theological Seminary v. City Yakima County Fire Protection Dist. v. City Gemtel Corp. v. Community Redev. Agency
of Poughkeepsie (N.Y. App.), 222 of Yakima (Wash.), 98 (U.S. App.), 315
Union Bank v. Fay (Ala. App.), 277 Yater v. Hancock County Planning Comm’n Golden Gate Hotel Ass’n v. City and County
Union County v. Hoffman (S.D.), 310 (Ind. App.), 75 of San Francisco (U.S. trial, Cal.), 101
United Artists’ Theater Circuit v. City of Yee v. Mobilehome Park Rental Review Golden State Homebuilding Assoc. v. City
Philadelphia (Pa.), 61 Bd. (Cal. App.), 69 of Modesto (Cal. App.), 351
United States v. Edwards (U.S. App., 9th Young v. Department of Community Af- Harris v. City of Costa Mesa (Cal. App.),
Cir.), 173 fairs (Fla.), 177 348
United States v. Morrow (USS. trial, Ala.), Kaufman & Board Cent. Valley v. City of
135 Z Modesto (Cal. App.), 350
United States v. Village of Airmont (U.S. Zaremba Dev. Co. v. City of Fairview Park Kawaoka v. City of Arroyo Grande (U.S.
trial, N.Y.), 194 (Ohio App.), 58 trial, Cal.), 33
United States v. Village of New Hempstead Zerbertz v. Municipality of Anchorage Kern County Farm Bureau v. County of
(U.S. trial, N.Y.), 83 (Alaska), 66 Kern (Cal. App.), 68
Zimmerman v. Zoning Bd. (Pa. App.), 97 Lancaster Redevelopment Agency v. Dibley
Vv Zonders, State ex rel., v. Delaware County (Cal. App.), 211
Valatie, Village of, v. Smith (N.Y. App.), 15 Bd. of Elections (Ohio), 264 Levald, Inc. v. City of Palm Desert (Cal.
Valatie, Village of, v. Smith (N.Y.), 295 App.), 36
Varnado v. Southern Univ. at New Or- Manhattan Sepulveda, Ltd. v. City of Man-
leans (La. App.), 76 hattan Beach (Cal. App.), 246
Vartan v. Zoning Hearing Bd. (Pa. App.), Metropolitan Outdoor Advertising Corp.
338 Index by State v. City of Santa Ana (Cal. App.), 247
Vezza v. Bauman (N.Y. App.), 17 Morehart v. County of Santa Barbara (Cal.),
Village of Valatie v. Smith (N.Y. App.), 15 ALABAMA 317
Village of Valatie v. Smith (N.Y.), 295 City of Orange Beach v. Perdido Pass De- Nelson v. Carlson (Cal. App.), 34
Village of Woodstock v. Bahramian (Vt.), velopers (Ala.), 276 Ojavan Investors v. California Coastal
130 Kirkland v. Planning Comm’n (Ala. App.), Comm'n (Cal. App.), 349
Village Supermarket v. Mayfair Supermar- 313 People v. Scott (Cal. App.), 176
kets (N.J. trial), 192 Matth~ ws v. Shelby County Comm’n (Ala. Pinnock v. International House of Pan-
Vulcan Materials Co. v. Guilford County App.), 136 cakes Franchisee (U.S. trial), 245
Bd. of County Comm'rs (N.C.), 377 Steadham v. Board of Zoning Adjustment Ramona Convent of the Holy Names v.
(Ala.), 209 City of Alhambra (Cal. App.), 175
Ww Union Bank v. Fay (Ala. App.), 277 Saad v. City of Berkeley (Cal. App.), 314
Wagner v. Jackson County Bd. of Zoning United States v. Morrow (U.S. trial, Ala.), Schnider v. County of San Diego (U.S. App.,
Adjustment (Mo. App.), 48 135 9th Cir.), 353
Land Use Law December 1994 7
Indexes
Sierra Club v. Department of Forestry and Corn v. City of Lauderdale Lakes (U.S. Racich v. County of Boone (Ill. App.), 253
Fire Protection (Cal. App.), 174 App., 11th Cir.), 42 Reed-Custer Community Unit School Dist.
Tahoe Keys Property Owners’ Assn. v. State Department of Transp. v. Weisenfeld (Fla. v. City of Wilmington (Ill. App.), 216
Water Resources Control Bd. (Cal. App.), App.), 144 River Park, Inc. v. City of Highland Park
316 Everett v. City of Tallahassee (U.S. trial, (U.S. App.), 319
Tobe v. City of Santa Ana (Cal. App.), 210 Fla.), 214 Rockford Blacktop Constr. Co. v. Boone
Transamerica Realty Services Inc. v. Cali- Hy Kom Dev. Co. v. Manatee County (U.S. County (Ill. App.), 358
fornia Coastal Comm’n (Cal. App.), 244 trial, Fla.), 178 Seiler v. City of Granite City (Ill. App.), 252
Traverso v. People ex. rel. Department of Karatinos v. Town of Juno Beach (Fla. App.), Warren v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals (Ill. App.),
Transp. (Cal.), 139 72 250
United States v. Edwards (U.S. App., 9th Moorman v. Department of Community
Cir.), 173 Affairs (Fla. App.), 213 INDIANA
Xiloj-Itzep v. City of Agoura Hills (Cal. Parker v. Board of County Comm'rs (Fla.), Brown v. Lowell Mining Co. (Ind. App.),
App.), 278 179 359
Yee v. Mobilehome Park Rental Review Patrick Media Group v. City of Clearwater City of Huntingburg v. Phoenix Natural
Bd. (Cal. App.), 69 (US. trial, Fla.), 104 Resources (Ind. App.), 217
Restigouche v. Town of Jupiter (U.S. trial), Reel Pipe & Valve Co. v. Consolidated
COLORADO 282 City of Indianapolis-Marion County (Ind.
B Street Commons, Inc. v. Board of County State v. Miccosukee Village Shopping Center App.), 360
Comm'rs (U.S. trial), 248 (Fla. App.), 71 Yater v. Hancock County Planning Comm’n
Board of County Comm'rs v. Martin (Colo. Young v. Department of Community Af- (Ind. App.), 75
App.), 37 fairs (Fla.), 177
Coats v. City of Cripple Creek (Colo. App.), IOWA
212 GEORGIA City of Wapello v. Chaplin (lowa App.), 110
Town of Lyons v. Bashor (Colo. App.), 280 Board of Zoning Adjustment v. Murphy Kamp v. Stebens (lowa App.), 320
Wilkinson v. Board of County Comm'rs (Ga. App.), 249
(Colo. App.), 354 City of Buford v. Ward (Ga. App.), 284 KENTUCKY
City of Hampton v. Briscoe (Ga. App.), 43 Bellefonte Land Inc. v. Bellefonte (Ky. App.),
CONNECTICUT Dyches v. McCorkle (Ga. App.), 283 147
Connecticut Resources Recovery Author- Ex Parte Pine Brook Lakes, Inc. (Ga.), 4 City of Bowling Green v. Cooksey (Ky.
ity v. Planning and Zoning Comm'n Michiels v. Fulton County (Ga.), 3 App.),5
(Conn.), 40 OS Advertising Co. of Georgia v. Rubin Helm v. Citizens to Protect Prospect Area
Deberandis v. Zoning Comm'n (Conn.), 355 (Ga.), 215 (Ky. App.), 148
DiBlasi v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals (Conn.), Washington v. City of Winchester (Ky.
39 HAWAII App.), 183
Fromer v. Two Hundred Post Assoc. (Conn. Hawaii's Thousand Friends v. City and
App.), 141 County of Honolulu (Hawaii), 73 LOUISIANA
Jago-Ford v. Planning and Zoning Comm’n American Waste & Pollution Control Co.
(Conn. App.), 356 IDAHO v. St. Martin Parish Police Jury (La.),
Kelley Property Dev. v. Town of Lebanon McCusky v. Canyon County (Idaho), 145 184
(Conn.), 103 Taylor v. Board of County Comm'rs (Idaho Frick v. City of New Orleans Dept. of Safety
Leo Fedus and Sons Constr. Co. v. Zoning App.), 105 and Permits (La. App.), 185
Bd. of Appeals (Conn.), 38 Howell v. City of New Orleans (U.S. trial),
Thoma v. Planning and Zoning Comm’n ILLINOIS 254
(Conn. App.), 1 Bank of Waukegan v. Village of Vernon Lakeside Imports, Inc. v. State (La.), 361
Thoma v. Planning and Zoning Comm'n Hills (Ill. App.), 318 Parish ofJ efferson v. Jacobs (La. App.), 149
(Conn.), 281 Cohen v. City of Des Plaines (U.S. App., Parish of St. Charles v. Frickey (La. App.),
Wnuk v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals (Conn.), 2 7th Cir.), 108 362
Firstbank Co. v. City of Springfield (Il. Polk v. Edwards (La.), 218
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA App.), 286 Trail Mining, Inc. v. Village of Sun (La.
Citizens Assn. of Georgetown v. District of Graff v. City of Chicago (U.S. App., 7th App.), 6
Columbia Bd. of Zoning Adjustment Cir.), 107 Varnado v. Southern Univ. at New Or-
(D.C.), 357 HWK, Inc. v. County of Kendall (Ill. App.), leans (La. App.), 76
Concerned Citizens of Brentwood v. Dis- 146
trict of Columbia Bd. of Zoning Adjust- Harp Advertising Illinois v. Village of Chi- MAINE
ment (D.C. App.), 142 cago Ridge (U.S. App.), 109 Greenberg v. DiBiase (Me.), 255
District of Columbia v. Wical Ltd. Partner- Harris Bank of Hinsdale v. County of Pine Tree Telephone and Telegraph Co. v.
ship (D.C. App.), 70 Kendall (Ill. App.), 251 Town of Gray (Me.), 77
Littlejohn v. City of N. Chicago (Ill. App.), Town of Freeport v. Ocean Farms of Maine
FLORIDA 287 (Me.), 150
Battaglia Properties, Ltd. v. Florida Land Memory Gardens Cemetery v. Village of
and Water Adjudicatory Comm'n (Fla. Arlington Heights (Ill. App.), 74 MARYLAND
App.), 180 Midland Enters. v. City of Elmhurst (Ill. Chesapeake B & M v. Harford County (U.S.
Board of County Comm'rs v. Snyder (Fla.), App.), 182 trial, Md.), 111
181 National Paint and Coatings Ass'n v. City Gardner v. City of Baltimore Mayor and
Bullard v. Lake County Code Enforcement of Chicago (U.S. trial Ill.), 106 City Council (U.S. App., 4th Cir.), 7
Bd. (Fla. App.), 41 Oliver Constr. Co. v. Village of Villa Park Kirsch v. Prince George’s County (Md.
City of Miami Beach v. Galbut (Fla.), 143 (Ill. App.), 285 App.), 44
8 December 1994 Land Use Law
Judicial Decisions
Montgomery County v. Waters Landing City of St. Joseph v. Preferred Family Star Enterprise v. Wilder (N.J. App.), 258
Ltd. Partnership (Md. App.), 151 Healthcare (Mo. App.), 154 Village Supermarket v. Mayfair Supermar-
11126 Baltimore Blvd., Inc. v. Prince George’s Forty Mill Realty Venture v. Missouri (Mo. kets (N.J. trial), 192
County (U.S. trial, Md.), 112 App.), 292 Wyzykowski v. Rizas (N.J.), 52
Potomac Group Home Corp. v. Montgom- Home Builders Ass’n of Greater St. Louis
ery County (U.S. trial, D. Md.), 45 v. City of St. Peters (Mo. App.), 189 NEW MEXICO
Prince George’s County v. Sunrise Dev. Oxford House-C v. City of St. Louis (U.S. TBCH v. City of Albuquerque (N.M. App.),
Limited Partnership (Md. App.), 9 trial), 257 328
Revere Nat'l Corp. v. Prince George’s St. Louis County v. Taggert (Mo. App.), 153
County, (U.S. trial, Md.),8 State ex rel. Barnes v. Hunter (Mo. App.), NEW YORK
324 Adkins v. Board of Appeals (N.Y. App.),
MASSACHUSETTS State ex rel. Childress v. Anderson (Mo. 226
Campbell v. City Council (Mass.), 46 App.), 155 Anthony v. Town of Brookhaven (N.Y.
City of Boston v. Back Bay Cultural Ass’n State ex rel. McArthur v. Board of Adjust- App.), 16
(Mass.), 363 ment (Mo. App.), 291 Baldassare v. Planning Bd. (N.Y. App.),
Cohen v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals (Mass. State ex rel. Menkhus v. City of Pevely 261
App.), 152 (Mo. App.), 190 C.B.H. Properties Inc. v. Rose (N.Y. App),
DiStefano v. Town of Stoughton (Mass. Wagner v. Jackson County Bd. of Zoning 374
App.), 321 Adjustment (Mo. App.), 48 Caprari v. Town of Colesville (N.Y. App.),
Henry v. Board of Appeals (Mass. App.), 225
219 MONTANA Chrysler Realty Corp. v.Oneck (N.Y. App.),
Jaworski v. Earth Removal Bd. (Mass. App.), Associated Students of the Univ. of Mon- 19
288 tana v. City of Missoula (Mont.), 156 Chuilli v. Town of Putnam Valley (N.Y.
Lopes v. City of Peabody (Mass.), 289 Kudloff v. City of Billings (Mont.), 117 App.), 12
Murphy v. Kotlik (Mass. App.), 10 City of Albany v. Feignenbaum (N.Y. App.),
Town of Sturbridge v. McDowell (Mass. NEBRASKA 367
App.), 186 Whitehead Oil Co. v. City of Lincoln (Neb.), City of New York v. Shakespeare (N.Y.
325, 326 App.), 297
MICHIGAN Cohen v. Vecchio (N.Y. App.), 123
Downriver Plaza Group v. City of Southgate NEVADA Collins v. Lonergan (N.Y. App.), 158
(Mich.), 290 Boulder City v. Cinnamon Hills Assoc. Eccles v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals (N.Y. App.),
Gerrish Township v. Esber (Mich. App.), 113 (Nev.), 294 228
In re Acquisition of Billboard Leases and Kelly v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency Fine v. Town of Hempstead (N.Y. App.),
Easements (Mich. App.), 364 (Nev.), 118 229
Smith & Lee Assoc. v. City of Taylor (U.S. 4900 Vets Corp. v. Scheyer (N.Y. App.),
App., 6th Cir.), 220 NEW HAMPSHIRE 161
Aranosian Oil Co. v. City of Portsmouth Gagliardi v. Village of Pawling (U.S. App.
MINNESOTA (N.H.), 50 2d Cir.), 296
Anderson v. Douglas County (U.S. App., Asselin v. Town of Conway (N.H.), 51 Heintz v. Edwards (N.Y. App.), 227
8th Cir.), 187 Hansel v. City of Keene (N.H.), 191 Hess Realty Corp. v. Planning Comm’n
Armour and Co. v. Inver Grove Heights New Hampshire Motor Transport Ass’n v. (N.Y. App.), 124
(U.S. App., 8th Cir.), 47 Town of Plaistow (U.S. trial, N.H.), 119 In re Farrington Close Condominium Bd.
Bukaka, Inc. v. County of Benton (U.S. of Managers v. Incorporated Village of
trial), 322 NEW JERSEY Southampton (N.Y. App.), 329
Communications Properties v. County of C.LC. Corp. v. Township of East Brunswick In re Markowitz v. Town Bd. (N.Y. App.),
Steele (Minn. App.), 116 (N.J. App), 120 331
Holmberg v. City of Ramsey (U.S. App., Car Spa, Inc. v. High Tech of S & C (N,J. In re Rudey v. Landmarks Preservation
8th Cir.), 256 App.), 122 Comm'n (N.Y.), 330
ILQ Investments v. City of Rochester (U.S. Distributec, Inc. v. New Jersey Dept. of Jordan’s Partners v. Goehringer (N.Y. App.),
App., 8th Cir.), 365 Envtl. Protection and Energy (N.J. App.), 370
Knudtson v. City of Coates (Minn. App.), 366 Laird v. Town of Montezuma (N.Y. App.),
114 Feriozzi Co. v. City of Atlantic City (N.J. 18
R.A. Putnam and Assoc. v. City of Mendota trial), 80 Leblanc-Sternberg v. Fletcher (U.S. trial),
Heights (Minn. App.), 188 515 Associates v. City of Newark (N.J.), 11 298
State v. Castellano (Minn. App.), 115 Kline v. Bernardsville Association (N.]. Leisure Time Billiards v. Rose (N.Y. App.),
App.), 82 263
MISSISSIPPI Macedonian Orthodox Church v. Planning Levada v. Board of Zoning Appeals (N.Y.
Oakman v. Town of Florence (Miss.), 78 Bd. (N.J. App.), 327 App.), 223
Mobile Home Village, Inc. v. Mayor and Marx v. Planning Bd. (N.Y. App.), 54
MISSOURI Council (N.J. App.), 157 Moody Hill Farms Inc. v. Zoning Bd. of
Arens v. City of St. Louis (Mo. App.), 293 Moroney v. Mayor and Council (N.J. App.), Appeals (N.Y. App.), 260
Bannum, Inc. v. City of St. Charles (U.S. 259 New York State Ass’n of Realtors v. Shaffer
App., 8th Cir.), 79 New Jersey Coalition Against War in the (US. trial), 262
Beatty v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer Dist. Middle East v. J.M.B. Realty Corp (NJ. New York Telephone Co. v. City of
(Mo.), 323 App.), 81 Amsterdam (N.Y. App.), 369
City of Dellwood v. Lattimore (Mo. App.), Non-Profit Affordable Housing Network O'Keefe v. Donovan (N.Y. App.), 300
49 of New Jersey v. New Jersey Council on Oxford House, Inc. v. Town of Babylon
City of Ladue v. Gilleo (U.S.), 221 Affordable Housing (N.J. App.), 53 (U.S. trial, N.Y.), 13
Land Use Law December 1994 9
Indexes
People v. Graham (N.Y. trial), 56 Danis Montco Landfill Co. v. Jefferson County of Venango v. Borough of
People v. Smith (N.Y. trial), 368 Township Zoning Comm’n (Ohio App.), Sugarcreek Zoning Hearing Bd. (Pa.), 95
Pius v. Suffolk County Dept. of Health 85 D’Emilio v. Board of Supervisors (Pa. App.),
Servs. (N.Y. App.), 193 Giambrone v. City of Aurora (Ohio App.), 92
Rockland Properties v. Town of Brookhaven 57 Doylestown Township v. Teeling (Pa. App.),
(N.Y. App.), 375 Jurkiewicz v. Butler County Bd. of Elec- 336
Saladino v. Fernan (N.Y. App.), 371 tions (Ohio App.), 88 Hill v. Zoning Hearing Bd. (Pa.), 94
Sekuterski v. Village of Lancaster (N.Y. Sherman v. Dayton Bd. of Zoning Appeals Hirsch v. Zoning Hearing Bd. (Pa. App.),
App.), 301 (Ohio App.), 86 307
Shank v. Town of Dryden (N.Y. App.), 20 State ex rel Hamilton v. Clinton County In re Application of Rouse & Assoc. Ship
Shubert Org., Inc. v. Landmarks Preserva- Bd. of Elections (Ohio), 87 Road Land Ltd. Partnership (Pa. App.),
tion Comm'n (N.Y. App.), 55 State ex rel. Kmart Corp. v. City of Westlake 339
Star Enterprise v. Pitts (N.Y. App.), 299 Planning Comm’n (Ohio), 196 Klein v. Council of City of Pittsburgh (Pa.
Tanana Oil Corp. v. Town Bd. (N.Y. App.), State ex rel. Zonders v. Delaware County App.), 378
373 Bd. of Elections (Ohio), 264 Klein v. Shadyside Health, Educ. and Re-
Teachers Ins. and Annuity Ass’n of America Triomphe Investors v. City of Northwood search Corp. (Pa. App.), 381
v. City of New York (N.Y.), 159 (U.S. trial), 265 Knipple v. Geistown Borough Zoning Hear-
Town of Brookhaven v. Spadaro(N.Y. App.), Zaremba Dev. Co. v. City of Fairview Park ing Bd. (Pa. App.), 165
372 (Ohio App.), 58 Lindsay v. City of Philadelphia (U.S. trial),
Town of Riverhead v. New York State Dept. 268, 269
of Envtl. Conservation (N.Y. App.), 160 OKLAHOMA Mann v. Lower Makefield Township (Pa.
Transportation Alternatives, Inc. v. Bankoff v. Board of Adjustment (Okla.), App.), 199
Gotbaum (N.Y. App.), 224 334 Martin v. Zoning Hearing Bd. (Pa. App.),
Unification Theological Seminary v. City 93
of Poughkeepsie (N.Y. App.), 222 OREGON Neill v. Bedminster Township Bd. of Su-
United States v. Village of Airmont (U.S. Alexanderson v. Clackamas County (Ore. pervisors (Pa. App.), 200
trial, N.Y.), 194 App.), 267 Olon v. Commonwealth (Pa.), 63
United States v. Village of New Hempstead City of Eugene v. Miller (Ore. App.), 163 Penllyn Lands v. Board of Supervisors (Pa.
(U.S. trial, N.Y.), 83 City of Eugene v. Miller (Ore.), 304 App.), 380
Vezza v. Bauman (N.Y. App.), 17 Clackamas County v. Marson (Ore. App.), Philm Corp. v. Washington Township (Pa.
Village of Valatie v. Smith (N.Y. App.), 15 335 App.), 305
Village of Valatie v. Smith (N.Y.), 295 Cope v. City of Cannon Beach (Ore.), 60 Russell Minerals Fayette, Inc. v. Zoning
West 97th-98th Streets Block Ass’n v. Vol- Davenport v. City of Tigard (Ore. App.), 91 Hearing Bd. (Pa. App.), 166
unteers of America of Greater New York Dodd v. Hood River County (Ore.), 59 Sharp v. Zoning Hearing Bd. (Pa. App.), 96
(N.Y. App.), 14 Dolan v. City of Tigard (Ore.), 22 Tinicum Township v. Tinicum Township
Wiederspiel v. Leifeld (N.Y. App.), 121 Dolan v. City of Tigard (U.S.), 232 Zoning Hearing Bd. (Pa. App.), 24
J.C. Reeves Corp. v. Sherwood Educ. Dist. Tire America, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing Bd.
NORTH CAROLINA (Ore. App.), 266 (Pa. App.), 128
Ayers v. Board of Adjustment (N.C. App.), Larson v. Multnomah County (Ore. App.), Township of Harrison v. Smith (Pa. App.),
231 90 340
Board of Adjustment v. Town of Swansboro McKay Creek Valley Ass’n v. Washington Township of Maidencreek v. Stutzman (Pa.
(N.C.), 84 County (Ore. App.), 23 App.), 379
Brown v. Town of Davidson (N.C. App.), Murray v. Columbia River Gorge Comm'n United Artists’ Theater Circuit v. City of
230 (Ore. App.), 197 Philadelphia (Pa.), 61
Dellinger v. City of Charlotte (N.C. App.), O’Mara v. Douglas County (Ore. App.), 89 Vartan v. Zoning Hearing Bd. (Pa. App.),
302 State Dept. of Transp. v. Altimus (Ore. 338
Garrity v. Morrisville Zoning Bd. of Ad- App.), 198 Weichert Ad & P Inc. v. Department of
justment (N.C. App.), 376 Transp. (Pa. App.), 127
Moore v. Board of Adjustment (N.C. App.), PENNSYLVANIA Zimmerman v. Zoning Bd. (Pa. App.),97
195 Annand v. Board of Supervisors (Pa. App),
Simpson v. City of Charlotte (N.C. App), 303 235 RHODE ISLAND
Town of Newton Grove v. Sutton (N.C. Appeal of Gregor (Pa. App.), 25 AAK, Inc. v. City of Woonsocket (U.S. trial,
App.), 125 Appeal of Miller and Son Paving (Pa. App.), R.L.), 201
Vulcan Materials Co. v. Guilford County 337 City of Woonsocket v. Forte Brothers, Inc.
Bd. of County Comm'rs (N.C.), 377 BAC, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors (Pa.), 234 (R.I.), 341
Bishop Nursing Home, Inc. v. Zoning Hear- Town of East Greenwich v. O’Neill (R.L.),
OHIO ing Bd. (Pa. App.), 306 26
Beck v. Springfield Township Bd. of Zon- Borough of Akron v. Hollinger (Pa. App.),
ing Appeals (Ohio App.), 162 233 SOUTH CAROLINA
Cardinale v. Ottawa Regional Planning Budco Theatres v. Zoning Hearing Bd. (Pa. Bennett v. Sullivan’s Island Bd. of Adjust-
Comm'n (Ohio App.), 332 App.), 129 ment (S.C. App.), 270
Cleveland Area Bd. of Realtors v. City of Carman v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment (Pa. Brady Dev. Co. v. Town of Hilton Head
Euclid (U.S. trial, N.D. Ohio), 126 App.), 308 Island (S.C.), 202
City of Springdale v. CSX Railway Corpo- Clinton County Solid Waste Auth. v. Wayne Historic Charleston Found. v. Krawcheck
ration (Ohio), 333 Township (Pa. App.), 382 (S.C.), 309
Community Concerned Citizens, Inc. v. Commonwealth v. Rogers (Pa. App.), 164 Multimedia Publishing Co. of S. Carolina
Union Township Bd. of Zoning Appeals Commonwealth v. Harchelroad (Pa. v. Greenville-Spartanburg Airport Dist.
(Ohio), 21 App.), 62 (U.S. App., 4th Cir.), 27
10 December 1994 Land Use Law
Judicial Decisions
Petersen v. City of Clemson (S.C. App.), Yakima County Fire Protection Dist. v. City to continue operation while its license
203 of Yakima (Wash.), 98 application is pending (U.S. App.), 342
Simpkins v. City of Gaffney (S.C. App.), 28 Adult use licensing is unconstitutional when
WEST VIRGINIA it permits delay while licensing depart-
SOUTH DAKOTA L.M. Everhart Construction v. Jefferson ment awaits reports from county agency
Union County v. Hoffman (S.D.), 310 County Planning Comm’n (U.S. App., inspections (U.S. trial, Md.), 111
4th Cir.), 64 Adult use stores may be banned from resi-
TENNESSEE State ex rel. Foster v. City of Morgantown dential areas—if allowed in other ar-
Copeland v. City of Chattanooga (Tenn. (W.Va.), 31 eas—without violating First Amendment
App.), 237 and equal protection rights of an adult
Davis-Kidd Booksellers v. McWherter WISCONSIN bookstore owner (Tex. App), 238
(Tenn.), 236 Baugh v. City of Milwaukee (U.S. trial, Charging $750 licensing fee on “adult caba-
E.D. Wis.), 65 ret” but $125 of nonadult enterprises
TEXAS County of Adams v. Romeo (Wis. App.), violates the First Amendment when city
Dallas/Fort Worth Int'l Airport Bd. v. City 207 does not base higher fee on desire to
of Irving (Tex. App.), 167 Edward Kraemer & Sons, Inc. v. Sauk prevent harmful secondary effects of adult
Davis v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment (Tex.), County Bd. of Adjustment (Wis. App.), uses (U.S. trial, R.I.), 201
204 32 City is entitled to preliminary injunction
Grand Brittain, Inc. v. City of Amarillo Gamble v. Eau Claire County (U.S. App., against juice bar featuring nude dancers
(U.S. App., 5th Cir.), 383 7th Cir.), 134 when use is prohibited in property’s zon-
Smith v. State (Tex. App), 238 “K” Care, Inc. v. Town of Lac du Flambeau ing district (N.Y. App.), 367
TK’s Video, Inc. v. Denton County (U.S. (Wis. App.), 208 City ordinance is void when enacted to
App.), 342 Old Tuckaway Assoc. Ltd. Partnership v. prohibit nude dancing in liquor estab-
City of Greenfield (Wis. App.), 242 lishments rather than to control harmful
UTAH Oneida County v. Converse (Wis.), 241 secondary effects of nude dancing (Minn.
Citizens’ Awareness Now v. Marakis (Utah), Save Elkhart Lake v. Village of Elkhart App.), 114
343 Lake (Wis. App.), 312 County board members are absolutely im-
Strucker v. Summit County (Utah App.), State ex rel. Hodge v. Turtle Lake (Wis.), mune from personal liability to adult
271 133 use promoters for adopting adult use
regulations and denying special use per-
VERMONT WYOMING mit for topless nightclub (U.S. trial, Colo.),
In re Barlow (Vt.), 131 Hoke v. Moyer (Wyo.), 275 248
In re Rusin (Vt.), 384 Sheridan Race Car Ass’n v. Rice Ranch Deadlines in adult use licensing scheme
Village of Woodstock v. Bahramian (Vt.), (Wyo.), 170 are reasonable where, despite poten-
130 tial delays, processing must be com-
pleted within 150 days and prompt
VIRGINIA judicial review is available (U.S. trial,
Krisnathevin v. Board of Zoning Appeals Md.), 112
(Va.), 29 Subject Index Establishment is not required to meet or-
Potomac Greens Associates Partnership v. dinance requirements of adult uses when
City Council (U.S. App., Va.), 132 ACCESSORY USES it provides entertainment featuring fe-
Tabb Lakes Ltd. v. United States (U.S. App.), City council may deny conditional uses male dancers with opaque theatrical
205 permit for accessory apartment when makeup sufficient to satisfy ordinance’s
denial is based on substantial evidence requirement that dancers’ breasts be cov-
WASHINGTON relating to low density residential neigh- ered. (N.M. App.), 328
Collier v. City of Tacoma (Wash.), 30 borhood and impacts of second units on Owner of an adult bookstore and theater
Erickson & Assoc. v. McLerran (Wash.), 311 aesthetic and property values (Cal. App.), who may choose among 63 relocation
Freeburg v. City of Seattle (Wash. App.), 348 sites has sufficient alternatives to pre-
99 Connecting garage to house via breeze- clude violation of his First Amendment
Friends of the Law v. King County (Wash.), way does not exempt garage from height rights (U.S. App., 5th Cir.), 383
274 and setback requirements of accessory When enacting adult use regulation, city is
Hilltop Terrace Homeowner’s Ass'n v. Is- use provisions (lowa App.), 320 not required to ignore other cities’ stud-
land County (Wash. App.), 169 Parking commercial dump trucks on prop- ies of harmful effects of adult uses just
Leavitt v. Jefferson County (Wash. App.), erty zoned residential is not impliedly because bookstores in other cities may
345 permitted accessory use (Mo. App.), have different characteristics (U.S. App.,
Norquest/RCA-W Bitter Lake Partnership 153 8th Cir.), 365
v. City of Seattle (Wash. App.), 239 Planning board’s approval of mixed use in Zoning ordinance requiring city’s first adult
Pierce v. Northeast Lake Washington Sewer historic commercial zone is invalid when business to relocate because it was lo-
and Water Dist. (Wash.), 273 proposed apartments have no relation- cated within 1,000 feet of protected use
R/L Assoc. v. City of Seattle (Wash. App.), ship to proposed commercial uses other is constitutional and not a pretext for
272 than proximity (N.J.), 52 banning adult uses (U.S. App., 8th Cir.),
Save Our State Park v. Board of Clallam Skateboard ramps are permitted accessory 256
County Comm'rs (Wash. App.), 344 uses customarily incidental to homes in
Sparks v. Douglas County (Wash. App.), residential zones (N.Y. App.), 158 AESTHETICS
240 Ban on retail sale of spray paint and large
Wilson v. City of Seattle (Wash.), 168 ADULT USES markers is invalid when only one per-
Woodcreek Land Ltd. Partnerships v. City Adult business in existence at time adult cent of these products are used by graf-
of Puyallup (Wash. App.), 206 uses regulation was adopted is entitled fiti vandals and ban has little possibility
Land Use Law December 1994 11
Indexes
of reducing or eliminating graffiti (U.S. City may condition provision of sewer ser- City council’s denial of use permit is proper
trial, N.D. Ill.), 106 vices beyond its borders on landown- when one ambiguous finding is unsup-
ers’ agreement to agree to future annex- ported by evidence but other findings
AGRICULTURE ation efforts (Wash.), 98 adequately support denial (Cal. App.),
Although farm zoning prohibits commer- City was required to pay damages to devel- 314
cial soil removal, landowner may re- oper for its breach of agreement to annex District may deny building permit for pro-
move up to 400,000 cubic yards of soil to island owned by developer and zone it posed towers that would pose safety
accommodate Christmas tree farming for development when lost development threat to Vice President of United States
(Mass. App.), 219 profits are established (Ala.), 276 (D.C. App.), 70
Commercial composting operation is nota Developers do not have vested right in Holder of building permit to construct por-
permitted use in an agricultural zone special use permits under zoning ordi- table cement plant cannot construct plant
(N.Y. App.), 260 nance that expires with annexation agree- on land purchased after the permit was
Denial of subdivide application is proper ment under which it was enacted (lll. issued (Ill. App.), 146
when commission determines that cu- App.), 318 Inland wetland permit to develop 50-unit
mulative impacts from parcelization are condominium project is not terminated
adverse to scenic area and threaten agri- APPEALS AND APPEAL with change in land ownership because
cultural uses (Ore. App.), 197 PROCEDURES it runs with land (Conn. App.), 141
Fish-for-a-fee business and retail sale of Administrative agency may not adopt regu-
fish and other products is not agricul- lations that alter authorizing statute (Cal. CIVIL RIGHTS
tural use of property under shoreland App.), 244 Arbitrary denial of building permit sub-
protection ordinance (Wis. App), 207 Burden of proof is on Florida’s Depart- jects city to damages under federal Civil
In agriculture zone, dogs may be kept for ment of Community Affairs when it ap- Rights Act (Wash. App.), 239
breeding as livestock; but boarding, peals a county development permit be- Developer has property interest claim un-
grooming, and training dogs are not ag- fore the Land and Water Adjudicatory der federal civil rights act when he re-
ricultural uses (Mass. App.), 186 Commission (Fla.), 177 ceived building permit and secured loans
Under Oregon statutes, asphalt/cement Town council may abolish board of zoning and made expenditures in reliance on
plant is not allowed within two miles of appeals and then recreate it with all new permit (U.S. trial, Fla.), 178
a planted vineyard whether plant is in members when board is neither required Hotel developer has not stated compensable
or out of exclusive agriculture zone (Ore. nor established by law (N.C.), 84 claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 when county
App.), 89 Zoning board of adjustment does not have imposed wage, hour, and benefit restric-
power to review board of commissioners’s tions on proposed hotel that allegedly
AIRPORT/AIR RIGHTS decisions (N.C. App.), 376 led to withdrawal of hotel proposal from
County airport board may not condemn redevelopment project (U.S. App.), 315
property when landowner grants access ASSESSMENT Racial discrimination has not occurred with
to property and agrees to limit land uses City may not require assessment reimburse- denial of commercial zoning for largely
to those compatible with airport's needs ments for road improvements when city black-owned residential neighborhood
(Ky. App.),5 has not adopted ordinance requiring own- and granting of commercial rezonings
Federal laws dealing with air traffic con- ers to elect to install improvements as of several white-owned vacant lots (N.C.
trol do not preempt local zoning or pre- prerequisite to development (Wash. App.), 230
clude town from enforcing its zoning App.), 206 Town’s refusal to allow landowners to place
against illegal airport (N.Y. App.), 372 mobile home for mentally ill daughter
Host cities are not prevented, via preemp- ATTORNEY FEES on nonconforming residential, commer-
tion, from exercising zoning authority When suit is not timely filed, it is improper cially zoned property does not violate
over airport land (Tex. App.), 167 for court to award attorney fees; how- state’s fair housing act (N.C. App.), 125
State may enforce statute requiring state ever, damages for civil rights violation Zoning requirements limiting houses of
approval of obstructions in airport ap- are proper (Wash. App.), 272 worship valid if they do not impair prac-
proach areas even when statute requires tice of religion (U.S. trial, N.Y.), 194
municipalities to adopt zoning regula- BUILDING CODES
tions for same purpose (Pa. App.), 164 City is liable to duplex owner for water COASTAL AND WETLAND
damage from plumbing in common wall REGULATION
AMORTIZATION when owner cannot repair it because Agency has authority to deny permission
Code provision terminating nonconform- original construction violated city build- for development of new port when there
ing use of mobile home outside mobile ing code (La. App.), 185 is no showing of inadequacy of existing
home park upon change in ownership is Owner of dilapidated pool hall is entitled ports or compatibility of proposed port
not valid amortization scheme because to decide whether to attempt repairs on with surrounding uses (N.J. App.), 366
period of ownership does not relate to the building rather than demolish it even Beachfront owner’s suit against town for
owner’s investment or land use (N.Y. when repair costs exceed its assessed taking damages is not viable when state
App.), 15 value (Ky. App.), 183 regulations would have barred devel-
Village may terminate nonconforming use opment and state purchased land in 1991
of mobile homes upon change of owner- BUILDING PERMITS (Fla. App.), 72
ship rather than on expiration of amorti- Arbitrary denial of building permit sub- Land buyers are subject to development
zation period (N.Y.), 295 jects city to damages under federal Civil restrictions when they fail to challenge
Rights Act (Wash. App.), 239 restrictions within 60-day statute of limi-
ANNEXATION Cellular telephone company’s second ap- tations (Cal. App.), 349
Annexed property “automatically” assigned plication to build microwave facility is Local wetlands ordinance applies only to
single-family zoning is unzoned because barred when it is not substantially dif- parcels identified in official wetlands
automatic designation is invalid (Pa. ferent from application denied two map and measuring one-half acre or more
App.), 233 months earlier (Wash. App.), 169 in area (N.Y. App.), 12
12 December 1994 Land Use Law