ALMANACS OF AMERICAN WARS oo K W A OR EAN AR LMANAC Paul M.Edwards Dedicated to Gregg Edwards:friend,colleague,son. Ifthe best minds in the world had set out to find us the worst possible location in the world to fight this damnable war,politically and militarily,the unanimous choice would have been Korea! —Dean Acheson Quoted in Michael E.Hass,In the Devil’s Shadow (Annapolis,Md.:Naval Institute Press),p.1. Korean War Almanac Copyright © 2006 by Paul M.Edwards All rights reserved.No part ofthis book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means,electronic or mechanical,including photocopying,recording,or by any infor- mation storage or retrieval systems,without permission in writing from the publisher.For information contact: Facts On File,Inc. An imprint ofInfobase Publishing 132 West 31st Street New York NY 10001 Library ofCongress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Edwards,Paul M. Korean War almanac / Paul M.Edwards—1st ed. p.cm.—(Almanacs ofAmerican wars) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-8160-6037-1 (hardcover :alk.paper) 1.Korean War,1950–1953—Chronology.2.Korean War,1950–1953.3.Korean War, 1950–1953—United States.4.United Nations—Armed Forces—Korea I.Title II.Series. DS918.E365 2008 951.904'2—dc22 2005009374 Facts On File books are available at special discounts when purchased in bulk quantities for businesses,associations,institutions,or sales promotions.Please call our Special Sales Department in New York at (212) 967–8800 or (800) 322–8755. You can find Facts On File on the World Wide Web at http://www.factsonfile.com Text design by Erika K.Arroyo Cover design by Pehrsson Design Maps by Dale Williams Printed in the United States ofAmerica VB FOF 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 This book is printed on acid-free paper. C o ONTE NTS Preface v Acknowledgments vii Introduction ix Chronology 1 Biographies 454 Weapons 492 Participation 512 Glossary,Abbreviations,Designations,and Terms 529 Appendices I.MEDALOFHONORWINNERSINKOREA 533 II.UNITEDNATIONSSENIORMILITARYCOMMANDERS 537 III.U.S.SHIPSSUNKORDAMAGED 540 IV.GROUNDTROOPCOMMITMENTBYNATION 543 V.COMBATSORTIESBYMISSION 544 VI.ACESOFTHEKOREANWAR 545 MAPS 548 Bibliography 562 Index 572 P o R E FAC E Most ofthose involved in the Korean War,whether in the military or the political arena,seem to feel that it was the wrong war.While both the decision to go to war and the interpretation ofwhat happened during the war will be argued for decades to come,it is clear that it was a war that America was not prepared to fight,either psychologically or militarily.Coming as it did so close to the victories ofWorld War II,it was a war that America did not want.At the same time,pressed with a fear of the expansion ofcommunism and well aware ofthe increasing role played by the United States in international affairs,it was a war the administration ofPresident Harry S.Truman believed had to be fought.And,as it turned out,it was a highly sig- nificant war.In many respects it was a watershed in the flow ofboth American and international history. Today,after more than a half-century,it is still difficult to understand all that happened during the Korean War.Arguments continue among respected histori- ans about the causes,the fighting,and the outcome ofthe war and most certainly about the legacy ofthe war.New information that has become available from the archives of our onetime enemies has shed new light on our inquiries and some- times provided new evidence for our established theories.To those studying the cold war (when it was important enough to be capitalized),the outcome of the Korean War often seems to be more interesting and significant than the war itself. Most ofus,however,without acknowledging the source ofthe condition,live out our lives in the shadow of decisions made and goals accomplished during those often desperate days. Since the 1950–53 conflict,the United States as well as the rest ofthe world has been involved in many struggles.The blood ofthe men and women ofmany nations has soaked the earth in the defense ofinternational peace and the pursuit oflocal- ized ideologies.Americans continue to fight and die in the continuation ofnational policies established and doctrines accepted during the days ofthe Korean War. Veterans ofthe Korean War do not seem to speak out as much as other veter- ans. They call their war the “Forgotten War.” They do not hold as many unit reunions;they do not produce a lot ofunit newsletters.They have not written as many memoirs,novels,poems,or songs to commemorate their service.They are not inclined to identify themselves as quickly by personal automobile plates or stickers in car windows.The reason for this behavior is one ofmany questions that remain about the war.But when seeing the extent ofthis conflict laid out on a daily basis,it v vi Korean War Almanac is possible to recognize the American commitment and the personal courage that appear day after day. We still do not know a great deal about the war.Some parts ofit seem immune to inquiry and understanding.The war was a very complex venture at an extremely complicated time in American and world history.The simple answers provided by orthodox and revisionist historians do not always apply. Often called a “police action,”a “conflict,”the “Korean Question,”a “limited action,”“Truman’s War,”the “war before Vietnam,”and traditionally the “forgotten war,”the action in the Korean War was warlike.It was a war in every sense and meaning ofthe word.It embraced all the political turmoil,the national pride,the military aggression,the dying,and the suffering that are reflected in any war. It was not,however,a popular war,nor was it a war that most persons,certainly most Americans,really understood.Following on the heels ofthe vastly popular and dramatically concluded World War II—during which nearly every American was deeply and personally involved—events in Korea seemed an unwelcome breech of a peace so dearly bought.The coming ofthe war was an interruption in the eco- nomic growth ofthe nation and an inconvenience to those who were called upon to fight once again and so quickly.The war was not personally felt by most other Americans.The draft,weakened by an elaborate deferment system,left the burden to only a few,generally lower-income families.There was no rationing and few shortages to be faced.Nothing happened,or was attempted,to impress on the Amer- ican people the seriousness ofwhat was occurring in that distant Asian nation.Later, the war in Korea was lost in the military and political turmoil ofthe growing con- flict in Vietnam,and its memory faded quickly from the American mind. There is still a great deal to be learned from the Korean War,as well as about the war.It was a war that was waged on land,at sea,and in the air.It was a war of combined operations,ofmilitary unpreparedness,offierce controversies and pro- longed negotiations.It was a war that reflected much ofthe major confrontation between the Free World and the communist world—between East and West.It wit- nessed a significant shift in American policy and strategy.And,it was a war during which limited objectives became both necessary and advantageous. A o C KNOWLE DG M E NTS I wish to acknowledge the major sources used for this work.Because ofthe scope of the task and the wide variety ofentries,it has been necessary to rely heavily on many secondary sources from which the bulk ofthe information presented here has been gleaned.The last few years have seen an increase in the scholarly work done,and a growth in the materials produced,about the Korean War.But there is still a consid- erable limitation as to what is available.In comparison to the information now on- hand about World War II,or even about the more debated war in Vietnam,the number ofsources remains small.There are not yet nearly enough ofthe monographs or narrative histories that are so important to the researcher.But fortunately there have been some excellent documentary works,as well as official histories produced in the last decade or so.A large number ofbooks,articles,and papers have been ref- erenced in the Almanac,and they are referenced in the attached bibliography.Some sources,however,require special mention.These are Kathryn Weathersby,coeditor, Cold War International History Project Bulletin(Korean Initiative);Walter G.Hermes, Truce Tent and Fighting Front(Office ofthe ChiefofMilitary History,1988);Roy E. Appleman,South to the Naktong,North to the Yalu(ChiefofMilitary History,1960); Donald Knox,The Korean War: Uncertain Victory(Harcourt Brace Jovanovich,1988); David Rees,The Limited War(1964);Lee Ballenger,The Outpost War: U.S.Marines in Korea,1953(Brassey,2001);Lee Ballenger,Final Crucible: U.S.Marines in Korea, 1952(Brassey,2000);Charles Whiting,Battleground Korea: The British in Korea(Sut- ton,2003);Ted Barris;Deadlock in Korea: Canadians at War,1950–1953(Macmil- lan,1999);William C.Russell,The Days at White Horse (Arlington,1988);Lynn Montross and Nicholas A.Canzona,U.S.Marine Operations in Korea,5 vol.(Histor- ical Branch,1954–72);T.R.Fehrenbach,This Kind ofWar(Brassey,2000 ed.);James I.Matray,Historical Dictionary ofthe Korean War(Greenwood Press,1991);Roy E. Appleman,Escaping the Trap(Texas A & M University Press,1990);Roy E.Appleman, Disaster in Korea(Texas A & M University Press,1989);Billy C.Mossman,Ebb and Flow: November 1950–July 1951(Center ofMilitary History,1990);James A.Field, Jr.,History ofUnited States Naval Operations,Korea(1962);and The Marines in the Korean War Commemorative Series,published during the 50th anniversary of the Korean War.This series,written by reliable historians from primary sources,is an excellent tool for anyone studying the war,but the various titles lack an index.Also of considerable value is the series of pamphlets produced by the United States of America Korean War Commemoration Committee (U.S. Army). Also to be vii viii Korean War Almanac mentioned,with thanks,are the individual contributors,with offerings in dictio- naries and encyclopedias;among these I would acknowledge the contributions of Clay Blair,Stanley Sandler,Allen Millett,James Matray,and Roger Dingman. Among the primary sources consulted were those found at the archive and library at the Center for the Study ofthe Korean War,located at Graceland Univer- sity’s campus in Independence,Missouri;Central Plains Region National Archives and Records Administration (Kansas City,Missouri);the Dwight D.Eisenhower Presidential Library (Abilene,Kansas);the Harry S.Truman Presidential Museum and Library (Independence,Missouri);and the Allied Forces Command and Staff College Library (Fort Leavenworth,Kansas).Appreciation is also expressed for the librarians and staffofthe University ofMissouri at Kansas City and ofPark Uni- versity,in Parkville,Missouri.Special thanks to the staff and administration of Graceland University,essentially to those at the Independence campus,where so often the seeds ofinquiry grow into blossoms ofunderstanding.And to the history faculty at Graceland University,even to those who do not think it is important. For aid in the work-up ofthe photographs used I am most grateful for the help ofLisa Hecht ofthe Center for the Study ofthe Korean War.Special thanks go to Megan Bethel for help with the maps and to Joni Wilson for her professional eye. Personal acknowledgment goes to my long-suffering wife,Carolynn;to Paula, Jeff,Gregg,DeAnne,Alison,Courtney,Megan,and McKenzie,now all delightful adults.Thanks to colleagues and friends Lisa Hecht,Leroy (Jack) Eller,Judith Charl- ton,Greg Smith,Cindy Roberts,and Nancy Eisler.And,ofcourse,to Bailey,who is never absent. I o NTRODUCTION The war in Korea (1950–53) is perhaps best understood if recognized as being fought in four phases.Each phase is fairly distinct.Initially,following the North Korean invasion ofSouth Korea,there was a period ofretreat in the face ofover- whelming odds.The Communist drive was met with increasing resistance as first the Republic ofKorea Army and then the United States and finally United Nations (UN) forces,began to fight back.Yet even after the effort was boosted by the polit- ical and military support of many nations, the United Nations Command was forced to withdraw in the face ofthe aggressive enemy.Soon the UN was driven inside a defensive perimeter running in an arc some 28 miles inland from the port city ofPusan.There the Eighth Army held fast in the southeasternmost part ofthe beleaguered nation. The second phase is represented by the dramatic end-around accomplished when General Douglas MacArthur’s X Corps landed at the port of Inchon,caught the North Korean Army unprepared,cut offits supplies,and began a drive north.At the same time,Eighth Army broke free from the desperate defense at Pusan and moved north to join with X Corps,after which the two units pushed inland.The North Korean Communist forces were driven back across the 38th parallel.At this point the United Nations halted only briefly.Then the decision was made to complete the job by crossing the arbitrary division between the Koreas.The objective was to destroy the North Korean Army and return all ofKorea to UN control.From the 38th parallel the United Nations Command began its move toward the Manchurian border at the Yalu River.The North Korean Army was initially shattered by the drive ofthe attacking forces and moved ever northward.In late October,troops ofthe advancing army reached their northernmost point,some even to the Yalu River.By November 1950,a conclusion to the war appeared imminent.The efforts to unite the Korean people under one government—friendly to the United States—seemed to be near fulfillment. The third phase ofthe war began when soldiers ofthe Chinese People’s Libera- tion Army—defined by the Chinese as volunteers—crossed the Yalu River and inter- vened in the war.The massive impact of these combat-seasoned Chinese troops caught the United Nations offguard and turned the once proud advance into a mas- sive retreat.The UN forces were driven back,both on the east coast,where X Corps was caught at the Chosin Reservoir,and on the west coast,where Eighth Army was involved in a widespread withdrawal.The Chinese soldiers who poured into Korea ix
Description: