ebook img

Klamath-Iron Gate Watershed analysis : version 1.1 PDF

274 Pages·2000·90.7 MB·English
by  
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Klamath-Iron Gate Watershed analysis : version 1.1

U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management ® Medford District Office Ashland Resource Area 3040 Biddle Road Medford, Oregon 97504 January 2000 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT -Klamath-lron Gate | Watershed Analysis Version 1.1 “ser bLV r >L DG 5( JEN\ vsEtews R. FEDERAL CEN TER __.__P.O. BOX 25047 DENVER,¢ C OLORADO 80225 ts As the Nation’s principal conservation agency, the Department of the Interior has responsibility for most of our nationally owned public lands and natural resources. This includes fostering the wisest use of our land and water resources, protecting our fish and wildlife, preserving the environmental and cultural values of our national parks and historical places, and providing for the enjoyment of life through outdoor recreation. The Department assesses our energy and mineral resources and works to assure that their development is in the best interest of all our people. The Department also has a major responsibility for American Indian reservation communities and for people who live in Island Territories under U.S. administration. BLM/OR/WA/PT-00/014+1792 Klamath-Iron Gate Watershed Analysis Version 1.1 EPr .Ow.r eBvOeXl 2504C7E NT ci Tier She 2 oe (~f 1 fITRBOA Tas Ay ee re SY A oe oe yg me eat be 2 Ste 3 Bureau of Land Management, Medford District Ashland Resource Area January 2000 «d Re ore re s iat ‘! ny e- yi if rv . a yi nd al i ad) 0 | it7 j - May . ac iis Roe r a“ 7 Air e7 w5 e Lo i at : LAU , x ‘aN re ‘fa a eaer e 2 ie coe a4 ~ eT Se! a : ii ' 1 Was <a & oy Mo _ ; % attei e en wsai eh oe Klamath-Iron Gate Watershed sis - Version 1.1 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Re CULEVe LSUAl Veen er Tt te et eles teins ene aie, Ne a nailer e's ae chins, % >)° V Titroduction Beseee sCaeaihek e63.60 5. 2: Fs cl ee eth SARS Saert ers altea p 1 Tssucs'and Key QuestiOn sim aw mes Plotea can 60805 ns ee eS, te Se. Wate ets ae, sees 4 Weacersued (haracten7auone Sine, ears fee eer ce nate iete mee etS is eis 5,6 .2 @ , 5 ora y 17 Game eantola) |b ge tg igR w Sa a ge AI eset Lie i ne args orn Ooa e 17 PIV (ATELS Cs Mere ee ene fie RO ty ree ore so, mes. s,© 19 Cli die Rar aan Pee Re ret ee Ste ee ee eee oe ee mere. 0.e ase 2 GeologyveandsGeomorpnologyae sini: <6 24s se at eee a tee 8, 24 ETOSiONsPrOCESSES ees Aloe Ale wh Verrniewil ins Gade enter e lane ete tse e ete, «ae 26 Soil Productivity gewcunityn-io: OP Pe Ais tabynh Bete Wot Me eee ares 27 TANASCADORV EVCLANONSLATLCII sie et htt Sis Feud yieterets fee tamer rte, «areas aie. sale 28 Plantes pecies-andeHabitatsiee. + me ausious Syms Foti. EE Ee ee es s,s 30 Hire andvAir, Ouality tun ee ee came « Peet Syeda Oy vs lide oh ia veers os «> 32 Terrestrial Wildlife Species and Habitats ..........ee.e e.ee. e-ev-e e 33 Hydrologymrav Hove22.y i .24. ee anes Seams EDGAR ORE YE NONE TIS & 34 Stream Channel ........... Ja attests Let iie etalk eerie. aoa ieea er ae 37 WateteC ality mamun "preriaheme Us otenanas RT MILCR BA teh OLS Sol es ee ete os 38 RIDAnIANEA TCaSemane entre eat re eS es: StU Ets 0 ig apt ie are ween 8 eo 38 Aquatic Wildlife Species and Habitats ..... 2... . 2. eee eee eee et es 39 Biieren tC ONGIION Sirabitny 0 Orie, Bt Safa or spine ewo geee so fs ya cs ates, wiiesay eoa peiey 9 mae 40 Puiniansh SCS y peemommmras eee reenter ee cs eye cree cya t,o, they one ee ea ole 40 SSP OClAl GA TEAS memes OMEN MPRA ce oe gk ae, tra a asa ce yo ye giey ocm eg oso y4 ,e ca es, #,8 pa y* 49 ETOSIONVETOCESSES ee Ce etee, Sere manners Eas See, eI, Bee ete ee Shes 50 SOLMETOCUCIEIVC Y sem rmenn tenM edBoet ee i kye thets ihe fee satea nie vaiieria v s:w ine <4{ ec ane 53 IPlanteSpecicsianaeabitats monte eee tree sk peter ses i hein eS eR. S aes ce ee ts 54 BOTesti Density and sv1SOls ewe er. eee PESO eo ek cee eis cw se ws 8 37 ire ance ilyQ uality em eon eck rien s Eis ats crem, es Lie SS eee ee tene e ™eh sete nas 60 Terrestrial Wildlife Species and Habitats .........0.. .ee. ee. ee.ee e 62 Ry POLOG Y Ronee etree en tae Mn ngec i? Sateen tue Sistah es rere et Ss ste 68 SET ETO, NSRP I PR eR en en 72 WVALCTLOUIAUITY Maman McRae hart suet mum eben Seen NE) fee sci Sg Stat a leon oie did. CeCe ete 74 OreR t) fee LE ys Ope A hat oie oe Ars Mie is ea Mehra Sees ae eee 80 Aquatic Wildlife Species and Habitats .... 2... 2... eee eee eee ee eee 80 Pe eTeCNCCHCONCILIONS mane weire Sot fos ee mun eres rot ag rer gs sk SS 58k Sue SPs gg ee 86 PAINE SCS ME ee Po col Sonata dues veel spel wehe s)< ee yes 42 86 SpcciaWAfeas@ ts ret ss Hew re te heat teaches heer se 97 ety ROMEL OECS G CS ert ttt PA RE eas Selig ole snp ece: eas tate eidl aoe eee 98 SEH EUTE R WI 35 2 EER y rays “Py Gut arp Seon Gene a ea 98 Klamath-Iron Gate Watershed Analysis - Version 1.1 Table of Contents Landscape Vegetation Pattern. |. 2 sci 4S eae scenes ce ie ee Cees 99 Plant. Species and Habitats? fae © tage ie 6 Fee ae eos ere is ete te os tees 100 Forest Density and Vigor) So: . ieee hiss sens eee Rane ahs mee eas 101 Fire and Air Quality °.e<5. 0.005) S708 Se lo aie feh et ec ols fo ann 101 Terrestrial Wildlife Species'and) Habitats 9.5..0-ucn,0 e0e --)- a oped Lr Ls h{tiuel (0-4 So ee es URAC rere ary Meni geen otek oS 104 Stream ‘Channel. 79. beh ooie ha teehee eine ct Cec eden. cen tne ee ee 104 Water Quality)... 2 Ga ns oak nt ole eo dee 105 Riparian Areas. 205 rics) ota kco e ee ee uo Penns fee ek et ee 106 Aquatic Wildlife Species and Habitats .°.2..52.. .0 gauer.sboet:eeeee.e t ame 107 Synthesis and Interpretation ’.....) [559.28 ake oe nee etn ele le oie. cea ae 109 Human Uses 6c as fact aceuee yee cern ce, ute ec ae ie, cec ence rr 109 Special Areas 20... 260. Sk. Geis a hens e+e foe ae Neier ist caec iecne ee re 111 Erosion Processes 03.5% 65s e)0 2 Fee es aces ole sells vo/a 4 2 eee man ees 111 Soil Productivity). 1/0005 bee cae da wen 9 oie a sete phates vef ener 112 Landscape ‘Vegetation Pattern .... 0/5; .. . . . -aee eens cee 113 Plant Species and Habitats. ....4..o.u «. » su.netea.neds. ben'e a.ne: .ee e 114 Forest Density and Vigor... 5)... .:......sie.ge)2 S.N .e.ee 115 Fire. and Air. Quality 9. .).0.s oc. 24% s pepe eet thing eg wee Secu eee 117 Terrestrial Wildlife Species and Habitats .....:........ .p.ea.n.. 118 Hydrology.2)0 0. iso Shas titticcah o's ate ola lae cle) biele a tekg sg. tebe Ane eae ee 121 Stream: Channel” ).0.57 32 Giro areas atet eve n:o Wi gotten © oet ea): on od ee 122 Water: Quality: (oo. tec eee oe atlas 0 bb Wate eee ecu 2 tos gue Ae 123 Riparian Areas i550) hb wio e oes oo 0d oph eebie RE trae cates eee Daten. 124 Aquatic Wildlife Species and Habitats ........c.ec.e .cs.cc.ce.cc s 124 Management Objectives and Recommendations for BLM-Administered Lands ....... 126 Landscape Planning Objectives and Recommendations for BLM-Administered Lands ... 149 Data Gaps... ee eee terete tts tsetse: : ees eee ines 154 Monitoring Recommendations ..°. . 2)... 5... sss ss ee cele ee eee eh anes ae ee 157 Research Recommendations, <0.) go. 2-55 5 c/s ons Coa tpn lees ee eh) 160 Maps 3. igre ae le eta hve ow ays when bvepe a Cees! oC isle ebena e cele nN oe 162 Listiof Preparers: 0.5 20.0 se os ec nis nts 6 os cactus ere Pe 185 RELCTENCES 6 oe oe ea oie a lathe neh Et vv tatav'e tg)s cold Uden sau edle cues ea ae ee rr 186 ADPOENAICES (5 ose a ele aig eee ite ta ea een ects ae et ne 194 Klamath-Iron Gate Watershed sis - Version 1.1 Table of Contents LIST OF TABLES Table 1. BEANO COWNETSNIQ ge tie fis hatte oon ueG ee ne csoa hd s SER Ser eiQAT - J - Table 2. Pederaimand Use Allocauonshy. si. ok Fin 1 oes See) peut «2 Table 3. Precipitations Zone Distributions: <) ey.c cc tih on Repeal Peonels Bares baddies Table 4. Structural Classification of Klamath-Iron Gate Watershed Vegetation Table 5. iVe getationrZones Dy Elevation’ >:t o. WlovscchaveOcwiena.n n1geM oiya Fiacne - Table 6. Ownership and Stream Information by Subwatershed Table 7. Stream Miles by Stream Category for BLM-Administered Lands Table 8. Wetlands Table 9. USGS Gaging Stations Table 10. Stream Channel Types Table 11. Most. Recent.Bi.Mi Fimber:Salest fap rhastctowe ore.s bbiaeer l,.f . Table 12. Acres Harvested and Volume Removed on BLM-Managed Lands Table 13. Grazing Information for BLM-Administered Lands Table 14. Special Status Plants Table 15. Survey and Manage Plant Species and Habitats fait indorsed guetta. Table 16. Values at Risk Due to Fire Exclusion, High Intensity Wildfire, or Wildfire Suppression Activities Table 17. Hire; Hazard. Ratings. ii sie wimias: is agen pete, os ate age eM ee anec ot trekte) ¢ Table 18. Representative Wildlife Species a “e le Ve te) @ (6 se (ene) 6 . 6 Te Vie, a) le (erie eo) 6) el 04 @ 6 6) ee) 6@) @, Table 19. Special Status Terrestrial Vertebrate Wildlife Species or ‘a. oe) ie (8 (e6. © 56) 6 e@ Je é 8 8) 'o Table 20. Road Information by Subwatershed oe Se @)terte ee (ete £6 ta.8 07 @F 8 ©), 16 AO) Ce) ote (6 je 8) ee Table 21. Estimated Percent of Hydrologic Recovery by Subwatershed eee ee © © © © © © © Table 22. Surface Water Rights Gie & Fei) 6) <@ ie) @ € fe ser ‘ete oF 6's ‘8 ee lene 6! © 8 8 € © O 6 @¢ 6 te; pie « © Table 23. Water Quality Limited Streams oe, 16. WO He; (el ge Te) et 8 6: jae, 46@. (6) @ 0 16) ‘OL .e 4 0 oe tebe eo je) @ef ie @ ile" © Table 24. Stream Temperature Monitoring Data @ue 0 ve’ ee lie pe ye « @€ @ 6 © 6 \@ 6 8.8 @¢ © 8 9 & © 6 Table 25. Fish of Iron Gate Reservoir LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Precipitation at Copco Dam and Howard Prairie Dam NOAA Stations Figure 2. Air Temperature at Howard Prairie Dam NOAA Station............... Figure 3. Air Temperature at Yreka NOAA Station Klamath-Iron Gate Watershed Analysis - Version 1.1 ; Table of Contents LIST OF MAPS Map-1.- "Watershed Location 20/4. cm 0-0 SA 2 ee 163 Map 2. «Land Ownership 2000s. 5.= 8 aoe oe alte Mae ee ne 164 Map 3. Federal Land Use Allocations: ...). . 43. . Rae 2 ae 165 Map 4.: Transportation Systeme"? 3227 OR. ee, 1 a eee ee 166 Map 5. Average Annual Precipitation..................... BE Sda 167 Map 6." Precipitation ‘Zones =. (2806 PHAN S Ne PUG a ee Re eee |e 168 Map 7. General Soil’Types ers ca. Soe Lane ett ee) ets, 169 Map 8. Vegetation Condition Classes... 1.84.Ge 1le. ee)e ae 170 Map 9. .S ubwatersheds "3.06 ee Se PE eee ore ae 171 Map 10. Stream Categories +)..004.20.... 4[eum5 S.RA 4e.e ¢e.e8 ee 172 Map. 11. Wetlands: >. 3:0). 4s oN Sl od SR, RE Si Rn 173 Map 12. Channel Morphology Classification... .......00..0 .cc .ece. ee.ce es 174 Map 13. Riparian Reserves +. Poa Oe ee NORRITSD } Pa: 175 Map 14. Fish Distribution’. 25. i eo) See a 176 Map 15.'Grazing ‘Allotments ¥x7. . << 7k, 8 Pee, SEs Se ee ee 177 Map 16, Fire Hazard: °° 0 ee ES Be, RR Be Te RUS SS 178 Map 17. Spotted Owl Critical Habitat Unit ...2. O<RR .a .Se.e.: 179 Map: 18. Deer Winter Range*o. 008. VN. ne ee eee, 180 Map 19, High Road Density Sections’ .+ +4...) S55 Saye) Pee pee: 181 Map.20. Water Right DiversionSs2/a% S402 0). Seer oe, Ree, ns ee Gee 182 Map 21. 15% Late-Successional Retention Areas ...................-0200c0- 183 Map-22. Landscape Planning 02% 40).9 827020 eee at a eden a, 184 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A. Public Comment Summary ....... 2... .20..0.4)415. 050 s A-1 Appendix,B.. ‘Noxious Weeds i005 0 Ss a ee es B-1 Appendix C. Channel Morphology Classification................-.2eeeceee C-1 Appendix D. Grazing Use on BLM-Administered Lands .................... D-1 Appendix E. Introduced Plant:Species #0...) eee eee E-1 Appendix F.., “Road ‘Densities’>4.0'mi/mi?, 22 Ut SOge WeP eers ae F-1 Appendix G. Stream Habitat Survey Data .....................00ceceee G-1 Appendix H. Schoheim Road Issues and Options ....................-000. H-1 Appendix I. 15% Late-Successional Retention Areas .................-0000e- I-i Appendix J. Instruction Memorandum No. OR-95-028 .................00-. J-1 Appendix K. Information Bulletin No. OR-97-064 .............0ce0ce0 0ue e K-1 Appendix L. Guidelines for Site Restoration (Native/Non-native Grass) .......... L-1 Appendix M. Roads of Concem 27 1. p24. aie so es ee M-1 iv Klamath-Iron Gate Watershed Analysis - Version 1.1 Executive Summary EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction Watershed analysis is the primary tool for generating information to implement ecosystem management as directed in the Northwest Forest Plan and the Medford District Resource Management Plan. The Klamath-Iron Gate Watershed Analysis describes conditions and interrelationships of ecosystem components for the Klamath-Iron Gate Watershed. The analysis focuses on issues and key questions that are most relevant to the management questions, human values, and resource conditions within the watershed. Management objectives and recommendations for BLM-administered lands are prioritized based on conclusions reached through the analysis. The watershed analysis formulates an overall landscape plan and recognizes the inventory, monitoring, and research needs for the watershed. The Klamath-Iron Gate Watershed Analysis was prepared by an interdisciplinary team of resource professionals and specialists from the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Ashland Resource Area and Medford District Staff. Some information regarding the California portion of the watershed was provided by the BLM Redding Field Office. The watershed analysis team followed the six- step process outlined in the Ecosystem Analysis at the Watershed Scale, Federal Guide for Watershed Analysis, version 2.2. The six steps or sections included in the Klamath-Iron Gate Watershed Analysis are: 1) characterization, 2) issues and key questions, 3) current conditions, 4) reference conditions, 5) syntheses and interpretation of information, and 6) recommendations. The Klamath-Iron Gate Watershed Analysis addresses the entire analysis area and is based on existing information and recent data collection. Where resource information is missing, a data gap is identified. The watershed analysis process is iterative and new information will be used to supplement future versions of the analysis. Public participation for the Klamath-Iron Gate Watershed Analysis included two public meetings in April 1999 and the opportunity to submit written and/or verbal comments. Approximately 1,200 notices regarding the open houses were sent to residents within the analysis area, people who had previously submitted comments regarding the Cascade/Siskiyou Ecological Emphasis Area Plan, local agencies, local groups, and the Klamath Tribe, the Quartz Valley Indian Reservation, the Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Indians, and the Confederated Tribes of Siletz and Grand Ronde. The notice provided a map of the area, explained watershed analysis, and included a comment form for people to mail if they couldn’t attend the open house. The first open house was held at Bogus Elementary School in Montague, California and the second was at the U.S. Forest Service’s Ashland Ranger District Office in Ashland, Oregon. The Ashland open house was for both the Klamath-Iron Gate and Upper Bear Creek Watershed Analyses. The purpose of the open houses was to give the public the opportunity to share with the watershed analysis team their ideas, concerns, information regarding the historic or current conditions, and recommendations on how the watershed should be managed. Klamath-Iron Gate Watershed Analysis - Version 1.1 Executive Summary Watershed Characterization The Klamath-Iron Gate Watershed covers approximately 66-square miles (42,360 acres) within the Upper Klamath River Subbasin. The watershed is located at the intersection of the Klamath Mountains and the southern Cascade range and extends from the ridge between Soda Mountain and Pilot Rock in the north to the Iron Gate Reservoir in the south. It includes Scotch Creek to the west and Fall Creek to the east, but does not include Jenny Creek. The watershed includes land in both Oregon and California. Land ownership within the Klamath-Iron Gate Watershed includes: Bureau of Land Management (18,075 acres), State of California (4,063 acres), and private lands (20,222 acres). Federal land use allocations include: Matrix, Riparian Reserves, District Defined Reserves, Special Areas (Pilot Rock Area of Environmental Concern, Scotch Creek Research Natural Area, Bean Cabin Recreation Site, Horseshoe Ranch Wildlife Area, Pokegama Wild Horse Management Area and Cascade/Siskiyou Ecological Emphasis Area), a Special Recreation Management Area (Pacific Crest National Scenic Trail), and a Wilderness Study Area (Soda Mountain). Regional public issues reflect the dominant uses of the watershed and include: concerns with off- highway vehicle use; grazing and timber harvest on public lands; concerns over general degradation of the natural environment; concerns about fish and water quality; and concerns regarding Siskiyou/Cascade ecological linkages. Public concerns more specific to this watershed include: land acquisition for Horseshoe Ranch and management of the Ranch for deer winter range; Schoheim road; the spread of noxious weeds; the Soda Mt. land exchange; access concerns (both by those wanting limited access and those wanting unlimited access); closing roads to prevent wildlife harassment and keeping roads open to provide access for fire suppression; and concerns over private property rights. The Klamath-Iron Gate Watershed is characterized by mild, wet winters and hot, dry summers. The lower elevations of the watershed are classified as having a low severity fire regime with frequent, low intensity fires, while the mid-elevations and drier portions of higher elevations have a moderate fire regime with less frequent fires and varying intensity. The Klamath-Iron Gate Watershed lies mainly within the Western Cascade Subprovince of the Cascade Mountain Geologic Province. The terrain within the watershed consists of steep hillsides and flat valley bottoms. The steeper slopes are subject to mass soil movement during rain-on- snow or intense storm events. The northern portion of the watershed is dominated by forest lands intermixed with large patches of shrublands and woodlands and some grasslands. Tree species in the northwest portion of the watershed are predominantly Douglas-fir and white fir or incense cedar with sugar pine and ponderosa pine scattered throughout. Douglas-fir and ponderosa pine dominate the northeastern portion with some incense cedar and white fir. The southern portion of the watershed is composed of juniper, shrubs, and grasses. There are 13 populations (three species) of special status vascular plants known to exist within the watershed and four sites (three species) of Survey and Manage plants. Noxious weed species known to occur within the watershed include St. Johnswort (Klamath weed), yellow starthistle, and medusahead wildrye. Other non-native species that have Vi

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.