ebook img

Key to the larvae of European Orthetrum Newman (Anisoptera: Libellulidae) PDF

6 Pages·1993·0.73 MB·English
by  ButlerS G
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Key to the larvae of European Orthetrum Newman (Anisoptera: Libellulidae)

Odonalologica22(2): 191-196 June I. 1993 Key tothe larvaeofEuropeanOrthetrum Newman (Anisoptera: Libellulidae) S.G. Butler Red Willow,AllStretton,Shropshire, SY66HN, United Kingdom Received October8, 1992 /Revised and AcceptedDecember 14, 1992 Based onlaboratoryreared material,adescriptivekey ispresentedofthe ultimate instarlarvae(exuviae)of8 spp.,viz.albistylum(Sel.),anceps (Schneider),brunneum (Fonsc.), cancellatum (L.), chrysostigma (Burnt.), coerulescens (Fabr.),nitidinerve (Sel.)andtrinacria(Sel.).Thepreviousdescriptionsarecriticallydiscussed,andsome additional structural features forspeciesseparationarestated. INTRODUCTION Current available keys to the European Orthetrum larvae are eitherregional or selective: GARDNER, 1954 (UK.); CONCI & NIELSEN, 1956 (Italy); FRANKE, 1979(Central Europe); CARCHINI, 1983(Italy); BELLMAN 1987 (Central Europe); CONESAGARCIA 1990(Spain). ASKEW (1988) draws together a selection ofpublished larval keys, but ex- cludes O. trinacriaandO. anceps.CONCI & NIELSEN (1956) figure detailed illustrations, including amuchcopied atypical labiumofO. coerulescens (p.265 fig. 149 andexplained p. 266 note [1]). CARCHINI (1983) does not appear to separate O.ancepsandO. coerulescens, particularly withrespectto thepresence or absence of dorsal abdominal spines (cf. BUTLER, 1992).KUMAR (1971) states that O. brunneumhas large dorsalabdominalspines — certainly not the case inEuropean individualsofthisspecies, although this is a featureon which FRANKE (1979)isalsounclear — andBELYSHEV(1973)describesitashaving no lateralspines. O. nitidinervehasbeen describedaseitherhavingno lateralspines (CONESA GARCIA, 1990),or lateralspines only on segment 8 (NIELSEN, 1955),larvae andexuviaeexaminedhave shownthesedetails so fartobe incorrect(BUTLER, 1992). 192 S.G. Butler With these current ommissions and contradictions in mind, a first attempt is madetoproduce akey tothelarvaeoftherelatively fewbutproblematic European species ofthis genus. MATERIALAND METHODS LarvaeofalleightspecieswererearedinUK.Adults wereobtainedfromallexcept forO.trinacria, larvae ofwhich died atF-1. The distinctive exuviae ofthis species wereobtained fromasitewhere it wasflyingin numbers. Material waspinned, cleanedand setwith thelabiumextended, but not flattened. Itwasthen examined usingx4O magnification. O. albistylum (Sel., 1848). Brenne, France, 13-VIII-I989;- Aliakamon River.Thessalo- niki, Greece, 28-VII-1992. [II larvae,3exuviae]. O. brunneum (Fonsc., 1837).- RiverVerdoule,Quissac,France,10-VIII-1989; - Aliakamon Delta, Thessaloniki, Greece, 21-VIII-1990; - El Burgo,Andalucia, Spain,20-VIII-1991. [l2 larvae, 14exuviae]. O. cancellatum (L.,1758).- Brenne,France, 13-VIII-I989; AliakamonDelta,Thessalo- niki, Greece, 21-VIII-I990; - Adra, Spain, 27-VIII-I99I; Henlow, Bedfordshire, UK, 29-VI- -1979. [22 larvae, 41 exuviae]. O. chrysostigma (Burnt., 1839). EIBurgo,Andalucia,Spain,20-VII-1991,25-IX-1992, J.Mason). [9 larvae, 10exuviae], O. coerulescens (Fab., 1798). Albufuera, Majorca, Spain,28-VIII-1987; Cramer Gutter,Shropshire,UK, 13-VIII-I99I; New Forest,Hants,UK,I-VIII-1982. [29larvae,56exu- viae]. O. nitidinerve (Sei., 1841). Churriana, Malaga,Spain,20-IV-1990, 21-VII-1991. [3 larvae, 3exuviae]. O. anceps (Schneider, 1845). Stavros, Thessaloniki, Greece; 10-VIII-1990,4-VIII-1992; - PetresRiverGorge,Rethymnon,Crete,Greece,6-IV-1991,R.G. Kemp). [l2larvae,lOexuviae]. O. trinacria (Sei. 1841). Adra, Spain,27-VIII-1991. [3 larvae,20exuviae]. Althoughthe numberand distribution oflabialandmentalsetaeareimportantspecificcharacteris- tics, afew individuals show slightvariations inthisrespect, therefore other featureshave beenused asprimaryseparationcharacters where possible. Alsoshortdescriptions have been added in order toreinforceidentification. Maximum/minimum publishedlengthsaregiven,however the overlappingofrelatedspeciesand the tendancy ofboth larvae and exuviae totelescope reduces the value ofprecise measurement as an identification feature. Finallythe needto prepare specimensin order to check thepresence or absence ofabdominalspines(BUTLER, 1992),cannotbe overstressed. DESCRIPTIVE KEY I Some abdominal segments with dorsal spines 2 No dorsal abdominal spines 4 2 Finalinstars smallerthan23mm. Dorsal spinesonsegments 4-7, labial palps with 3 (rarely4) setae(Fig.5) coerulescens (Dorsal spines often hiddenby dirtand surroundingsetae. Midtodarkbrown,epiproctrelatively short, length 16-20 mm). Final instars largerthan 23 mm 3 3 Dorsal spinesonsegments6,5and4(Fig.I).Ratiolength/widthofepiproct~2 cancellatum (Paired spots noticeable on the dorsal abdominal surface ofclean larvae and exuviae (Fig.2); Larvalkey ofEuropean Orthetrum 193 Figs 1-12. Structural features oftheEuropeanOrthetrum larvae: (1-2) cancellatum (L.); — (3-4) trinacria(Sel.).; — (5)coerulescens (Fab.); — (6-7)albistylum(Sel.); - (8)nitidinerve (Sel.); — (9-10)brunneum (Fonsc.);— (11-12)chrysostigma(Burnt.). —[Figs 1,3,6;abdomen, lateralview, scalebar 10mm; - Fig. 2: abdomen, dorsal view,scale bar7 mm; — Figs 4-5, 7-8, 10,12:labia, dorsalview, scalebar 3 mm; — Figs 9, 11;anal appendages,dorsal view, scalebar 1mm]. on segments 9and 10oflive larvae there isapaleareacontainedwithin thespots,labial palps with 8 setae, length23-28 mm). Dorsal spinesonsegments 4and5only (Fig. 3).Epiproctlengthened,ratio length/widthatleast 2,5 „ trinacria (No abdominal spottingas above, but noticeable darkeningboth dorsally and ventrallyonlast three segments, labial palps with5 setae(Fig.4),length 23-30 mm). 4 Labialpalps with5orless setae 5 194 S.G. Butler Labialpalps withmorethan5 setae 6 5 Longepiproct.ratio 1/w ~ 2.Total length> 20mm ialbistylum (Largelarva similar toO.cancellatum, but with less pronounced abdominal spotting and mid- -dorsalclumpsofsetae,andno spines(Fig.6). Segments8.9and 10withdarkbrown suffusion dorsally and ventrally. Labialpalps with 5setae(rarely 6) (Fig.7). length 23mm). Shortepiproct. ratio <2. Totallength <20 mm anceps (Closeinappearanceto O.coerulescens, butwithoutdorsalspinesand generallyalighterbrown colourwhencleaned, labial palps with3 setae, (see alsoFig. 5).length 16-18 mm). 6 Prementum withsingle long outer setae nitidinerve (Midbrown appearance, few markingsand littlecoloration.Labial palps with 6setae,(Fig. 8), length 20-22 mm). Prementumwithseveral longouter setae 7 7 Prementum with3longsetae. Total length ~ 20mm brunneum (Variable incoloration and size.Epiproctalmostequilateralin dorsal view (Fig,9). labial palps with6(rarely7) setae.(Fig. 10). length 18-22mm). Prementum with 4+longsetae.Total length<20mm chrysostigma (Mid todarkbrownincolour. Epiproctwithmore slenderisoscelid appearance (Fig. 11),labial palps with7(rarely 8) setae.(Fig. 12), 18-19mm). DISCUSSION Alleight species occur in both still and running water bodies. In Europe, O. cancellatum appears to inhabit the widest range of habitats, including lakes, ponds, gravel pits, marshes, peat bogs, ditches, streams and slow flowing large rivers. O. coerulescens inhabitsallbut the largerlakes andrivers. O. nitidinerve has been recorded up to an altitude of 2300 m. (ASKEW, 1988), whilst O. brunneum is deemeda lowland species (ROBERT, 1958). Larvae are almost always found concealed inmud, thepresence orabsence of vegetation does not appear to be significant. Exuviae are commonly found on vertical emergent vegetation at the margins ofwater bodies, mostly atheights ranging from 10 - 90 cm above the ground. MORPHOLOGICAL FEATURES Overall length (interspecific overlaps reduce thisasa valuablefeature, butthreemaingroupscanbediscerned). — (1)albistylum,trinacria, cancellatum: >22mm; — (2)brunneum,chrysostigma, nitidinerve: 18-22mm; — (3) coerules- cens, anceps: 16-20mm. Abdomen.— Dorsal spots canbe seen in cleanspecimens ofalhistylum, hrunneum and anceps, less so in chrysostigma and coerulescens. The boldest marking is incancellation.Markings canbeenhanced by wetting dirty specimens of larvae and exuviae. Anal appendages. — Thesearenoticeably long inalhistylum,cancella- tionandtrinacria.Theoverallshape oftheepiproct alsoseems tobeareasonable separation feature between chrysostigma and hrunneum. Larvalkey ofEuropean Orthetrum 195 Lateral spines. — Thesearepresenton segments8 and9inallEuropean species, butparticularly hard to detectwithoutcare inbrunneumandnitidinerve (cf. BELYSHEV, 1973; CONESA GARCIA, 1990). Dorsal spines. — These are present only in cancellatum, coerulescens andtrinacria.Inotherspecies, particularly inalbistylum andanceps,thecombina- tionof dorsalprotuberances and clumps ofsetae give the impression ofspines in both larvae andexuviae.Careful cleaning and observation are therefore vital to specific identification. Labium. — The numberand distributionoflabialsetae, although variable in a small percentage of individuals, is most important in the separation of hrunneumandchrysostigma andwill help toreinforceidentificationinother spe- cies. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am thankful to BOBKEMPand JOHN MASONforspecimens,GRAHAM VICK for advice andcomments on thekey and toBASTIAANKIAUTA forsuggestionsandreferences. REFERENCES d'AGUILAR, J.. J.-L. DOMMANGET& R. PRECHAC. 1985. Guide des libellules d'Europeet d'Afrique duNord. Delachaux & Niestle. Neuchätel - Paris. ASKEW,R.R., 1988. The dragonfliesofEurope. HarleyBooks. Martins. BELLMAN, H., 1987. Libellen:beobachten, bestimmen. Neumann-Neudamm, Melsungen-Berlin- -Basel-Wien. BELYSHEV, B.F. 1973. ThedragonfliesofSiberia (Odonata),Vol. I.pi. 1.Nauka, Novosibirsk. — [Russ., with Engl,title]. BUTLER. S.G.,1992. Thelarva ofOrthetrum nitidinerve(Selys, 1841) (Anisoptera:Libellulidae). Odonalologica21(1): 73-78. BUTLER, S.G., 1992. The larva ofOrthetrum anceps (Schneider. 1845)(Odonala: Libellulidae). Opusc. zool.flumin. 100: 1-6. CAMMAERTS.R„ 1980.Lalarved'Orthetrumchrysostigma(Burmeister, 1839)(Anisoptera:Libel- lulidae). Odonalologica4(2): 73-80. CARCHINI, G., 1983. Akey totheItalianodonatelarvae. Soc.ini.odonalol. rapidComm.(Suppl.) I; vi + 102 pp, CLOPEAU, R„ M. LEVASSEUR & F. BOUDIER. 1987. Cld pour Lidentification des exuvies des especes Ouest-Europeennes du genre Gomphus(Leach. 1815) (anisopteres: Gomphidae). Martinia5; 3-12. CONCI, C.& C. NIELSEN, 1956. Fauna d'Italia,Vol. I: Odonala. Calderini, Bologna. CONESA GARCIA. M.A., 1990. Akey tothe Iberian Orthetrumlarvae (Anisoptera;Libellulidae). Notul. odonalol. 3(6):86-88. CORBET,P.S., 1953. Aterminologyfor the labium oflarval Odonata. Entomologist86: 191-196. DUMONT, H.J., 1972. Contribution äla connaissance des Odonates du Maroc. Bull. Soc.Sei. nat. Phys. Maroc 52(3-4)pp. 149-179. DUMONT, H.J., 1991. Odonata ofthe Levant. Israel Acad. Sei.. Jerusalem. — [FaunaPalestina, Insecta5J. 196 S.G. Butler DUNKLE,S.W., 1989. SpursonOdonata legs,Selysia 18(1): 1. FRANKE, U„ 1979. BildbestimmungsschlüsselmitteleuropäischerLibellen-Larven. Slung. Beilr. Naturk. (A) 333: 1-17. GARC1A-PARRON, M.J., &A. BENITEZ-DONOSO, 1988.Arecord ofthe exuviae ofOrthetrum trinacria(Sei.)fromnorthernExtremadura, Spain(Anisoptera:Libellulidae).Nolul. odonatol. 3(2): 33-34. GARDNER,A.E., 1954,Akey tothelarvae oftheBritishOdonata. Enl.Gaz. 5: 157-171, 193-213. KUMAR, A., 1971. The larval stages ofOrthetrum brunneum brunneum (Fonscolombe) with a description ofthe last instar larva ofO. taeniolatum (Schneider).J.nat.Hist. 5: 121-132. MACNEILL, N.,The larvaofOrthetrum coerulescens (Fabricius)and itshabitat. Enl. Gaz., 19(3): 159-163. NIELSEN, C„ 1955.Esuvia ninfaledel genre "OrthetrumNewmann”referibile probabilimenteall’ "O. nitidinerve Selys”. Boll. 1st.Enl. Unix. Bologna21: 197-200. ROBERT,P.-A., 1958.Les libellules(odonales).Delachaux etNiestle,Neuchatel-Paris. SCHNEIDER, W„ 1985.The types ofOrthetrum anceps(Schneider,1845) andthetaxonomic status ofOrthetrumramburii (Selys, 1848)(Insecta;Odonata: Libellulidae).Senckenhergianahiol. 66(1/3):97-104.

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.