ebook img

Kajian Malaysia, Vol. XXI, Nos. 1&2, 2003 THE TAQWA VERSUS QUWII/AH DICHOTOMY PDF

40 Pages·2010·2 MB·English
by  
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Kajian Malaysia, Vol. XXI, Nos. 1&2, 2003 THE TAQWA VERSUS QUWII/AH DICHOTOMY

KajianM alaysia,V ol. XXI, Nos.1 &2, 2003 THE TAQWA VERSUS QUWII/AH DICHOTOMY: AN ISLAMIC CRITIQUE OF DEVELOPMENT VIA THE MALAYSIAN BAMIPUTERA POLICY AhmadF auziA bdul Hamid Schooolf DistanceE ducation UniversiStia insM alaysia Penang One will not dispute the contribution made by various planks oJ' the BumiputeraP olicy to the improvementi n Malay economic conditions, and the consequents hift oJ'a portion oJ'the Malays to what may be termed as the'middle class'. The rapid industrialisation and modernisation oJ- a developing country have conventionqlly been associatewd ith classs hifts involving the expansionr tf'a dynamic middle classT. he emergenceo fa Malay middle cla,ssh ecomeo bservablew ith 'New thep opularisation of'the term Malay' in the national prtlitical' economicle xicon o/'the 1990s.B ut it is questionablew hether the so- called| [ew Malay is comparable to the middle class who,sed ynamism historically. /uetted economic expansion' In the Malaltsian case' it is arguedt hat under the aegis o.f the state, the New Malay has .failed to nurture competitive characteristics essentiql to withstQnd external pressuresa, s shown in the debacle befalling Malay businessesi n 1997- 1998T. his hes been in part, due to the.focuso n materiul acquisition of wealtha s the end in the whole package of'the Bumiputera Policy, to the neglecot f other issuesw hich are neverthelessim portant in building an honourablec iviliscttion.T he issueso J'attitudes,m otivation and mrtralit.y ares omee xamples.I t is pertinent here to cctnsidera n Islamic critique o.f the Bumiputera Policy. The scope of investigation narrows dou'n towqrds unraveling the /actors for the success of the bqnned Darul Arqammovemenat nd itsd efacto successorR, uJaqa'Corporation. Their successs hows that, through.faith in God and religious solidarity, it is possiblef or Bumiputeras to assume middle class credentials without relyingo n statep atronage.D arul Arqam and Rufaqa'formed part of the informat sector of the Malal' middle class, by which is meant the sector which elfected advancements in socio-economic terms without depending on state-conditioned networks rt' the Bumiputera Policl'. Theseg roups, which invariablyJbcused on small and medium industries (SMIs),w ere criticctt of the Bumiputero Policy.for its inculcation qmong 123 ,AhnadF au:i Abdul Hamid the Melavs o/' .financial dependencv on the state and its detrimentql e/jects on Molat,attitttdes and motivation. INTRODUCTION This paper examinest he dichotomy that has emergedb etwecnt wo scemingly competing approaches in the efforts to fostcr Muslim development.T hese are, the quwwah-baseda pproach and the taqwa' baseda pproach.O n one hand, quww'ahr ef-erst o material strength,s uch that prevails in fields with tangible output such as in sciencea nd technologyi,n military capacity,i n politicsa nd in the economy.rO n the other hancl,t oqttct refers primarily to the strength of one's soul in its relationshipto God, as indicatedb y one's instinctivef ear of God, to the extent that one is afraid of cornmitting even the slightest sin.2 Hence, while rTrrn'r.raefnt compassems ental and physicald imensionst.a qu'ai s usuallys eena s a spiritually-ladenc oncept,a lthought his doesn ot mean that the attainmento f taqv'a deniest he improvemento f the mental and physical facultics.T he importanceo f taqwu is indicatedb y the fact that reminding about it is one of the requirementsi n Friday sermons, meaning that at worst, Muslims will listen to the significanceo f attainingl aq\Naa t least once a week. Quranic versese njoining taqwa and praising the muttaqin,i .e. thosew ho attain taqwa, abound.S omea re given here( the direct translationso f taqwa andm uttaqiria re in bold): Hold firmly to what We have given you, and bring (ever) to remembrancwc hat is therein,p erchancey ou may fear Allah. (Al- Baqarah2 :63) So fear Altah, for it is Allah that teachcsy ou. And Allah is well acquaintedw ith all things. (Al-Baqarah2 :282) Nay, thoset hat keept heir plightedf aith and act aright.V erily Allah lovest hosew ho act aright. (Al-i-'hnran3 :76) It is frorn the Arabic Eru'wah that we dcrive the Malay word kuul, meantng 'strong'. For comparativcd efinitionso f taqwa,s eeA shaariM uhammad( l98tta: I l2) andM awdud(i1 991I: l6 ll9). 124 TheT aqv'uv ersusQ uw'--oDh ic'hotom.v o you who believelP ersevcreim patiencea nd constancyv; ie in such perseverances; trengthene ach other; and fear Allah; that you may prosper. (Al-i-'lmran3 : 200) Be just, that is next to Piety, and fear Atlah. For Allah is well- acquaintedw ith all thaty ou do. (Al-Maidah5 : t3) If the peopleo f the towns had but believeda nd feared Allah, We shouldi ndeedh aveo penedo ut to them (all kinds ot) blessingsfr om heavena nd earth.B ut thcy rejected( thc truth) and we brouglrtt hem to book for their misdeeds. (Al-A'raf 7: 96) And he who bringst he Truth, and he who confirms( ands upports)it - sucha ret he men who do right. (Az-Zunar3 9: 33) Of Allah: it is only wrongdoers( that stand as) protcctors,o ne to another.B ut Allah is the Protectoro f the Righteous. (Al-Jathiya 45:1 9) O mankindl We createdy ou from a single (pair) of a male and a female, and rnade you into nations and tribes, that ye may know each other (not that ye may despisee ach othcr). verily the most honouredo f you in the sight of Allah is (he who is) the most Righteouso f you. (Al-Hujurat4 9: l3) And for those who fear Allah, He (ever) preparesa way out, and He providesf or him from (sources)h e never could expect"" And for thosew ho fear Allah, He will maket hingsc asyf br thern' (At- Talaq65:2-4) while the dichotomy per-vadetsh e thinking of Muslim policy-makcrs globally,t his paperf ocuseso n Muslimsi n Malaysiaa s an cxampleo f an environment in which approaches to Islamic dcvelopment are concomitantly pursued by different movements and organisations, whethers tate-basedo r independentlys tructured.E ventually, the scope of investigationn arrows down to one selectedm ovement,v iz. thc sutl- revivalistD arul Arqam and its de. facto stlccessorR, ufaqa' Corporation. The findings show how this movement'su nconventionaal nd as some may claim, undue emphasiso n taqwa at the expenseo f quwwah, have yleidedi nterestingre sultsw hich may be takena s a lessonb y all aspiring 125 AhmadF auziA bdulH ctmid Muslims.T he positive and negativei mplicationso f sucha n approacha re assessedto, wardsa formulation of a strategicp lan for the ummah' TAQWA VERSUS QI]WWAH IN MUSLIM DTSCOURSE In Muslirn discourseso n the stateo f contemporaryI slam' whethera t the scholarly or the popular level, it has been fashionablet o detcct at least 'decline three f-actorsr esponsiblef or the so-called of Islam', viz. Muslims' own deviation from the true path, the intransigenceo f lslam against accepting any form of reformation or compromise with modernity; and the West and its pervasive influence within Muslim nation-statesm, any of whom had themselvesb een victims of Western colonialisrn (Piscatori 1986: 24 26). As a result of the different diagnoseso ffered, different schools of thought have emerged among H,luilim studentso f the global phenomenonv ariously known as Islamic resurgenceI,s lamic revival, Islamic reawakeninga nd Islamic renewal. This is without yet mentioning the countlessw orks and opinions that Western scholarsa nd observersh ave produced and fonnulated on the subject.l Of practical interest to us here is not these abundantW estern analyses,w hich Muslims are bound to reject as deriving from non- Muslim sources and having vested interests,b ut rather the panacea offeredb y Muslim analystss eeingt he world from a Muslim angle' Discussionsp ertainingt o Muslim-centrics olutionsh avem arkedlyr isen since the new pressuresp ut on the ummtth by the West since the late 1980s.W hile antagonismb etweent he Westerna nd Islamic worlds had arguablyb eeni n existences incet he medievald ays,t he presentp ressures are unpreceilentedi n thc post-second World War intemational order. Two major developmentsc ontributedt o this. First, an end to a bipolar world as sparkedo ff by the crumbling of the communist empire which had hitherto acted as a countervailing power to attempted Western hegemony.T he scenario was given a completely new dimension by 'clash Huntington's thesis which posited a future of civilisations' betweent he Judeo-Christiana nd Confucian-Islamicp eoples( Huntington 1993).S econd,t he huge rise in warlike and terorist-relateda ctivities attributed, sometimes falsely, to Muslims as representingt heir iihad t For an overview, seeM uhammad Abu Bakar (1987: chapterl 3) and Ahmad FauziA bdul Hamid( 2001a). t26 TheT aqn*av ersusQ uwwahD ic:hotomy (holyw ar) againstt he West. Events such as the bombingso f the World TradeC entre( WTC) in New York in 1993 and of the Alfred P. Murah FederaBl uilding in OklahomaC ity in 1995c reateda n atmospherwe ell- preparedf or the ceaselessv ilification of Islam and Muslims in the Westernm edia, following the devastating blows to the WTC and Pentagonb y suicide hijackers of commercial flights on l1 September 2001.S ecurityo f Muslims becamea global concernw ith the relative easeb y which, in their hunt for allegedly Islamic terrorists, the American-ledA llied forces invaded and willfully determinedt he fate of Afghanistana nd Iraq. This was the latest in a series of catastrophes whichh ad seenM uslims being victims of exterminationin the 1990si n Bosnia,C hechnya, India and Israel, among others. Taking all these disastroues ventsi nto perspective,a nd acknowledgingt he existenceo f a crisis,M uslim leadersh ave beenh ard-pressedto come up with solutions to thep redicamento f the ttmmah. In thea bsenceo f specificallyI slamicm odelso f nationb uilding,M uslim leadersa nd intellectualsr esoftedt o hypothesesa nd an arbitrary reading of historyi n coming out with propositionsa nd viewpoints.T he remedies to ills befalling Muslims generallyt ook the position of being either taqwa-basedo r quwwah-based.O pting for one did not mean totally neglectinge lementso f the other. Rather, it was a question of priority. But the less prioritised element did not feature significantly enough to have an impact on the chosen policy. Amongst scholars with strong trainingi n madrasah-basedtr aditional Islamic sciences,w hat seemedt o be like taqwa-baseda pproachesw ere generally preferred, although in reality, taqwa was seldom, if ever, mentioned in such traditionalists' discoursesH. owever, most disappointingly,t he proposed solutions of traditionalistsfa iled to integratet raditional Islamic sciencesw ith modern scientific education. Most settled for a simplistic course of action involving regenerationo f imctn (faith) via ritualistic forms of ibadah (worship) and direct missionary effort, directed especially at lax Muslims (cf. Ehteshamul Hasan 1989). Such thinkers espoused a romantic view of history which lauded glorious achievements of Muslimso f early generationsb, ut they failed to apply the fundamentals of thosee arly generationsin a mannerw hich would harnesst he positive valueso f modern education.S tuck in intellectual slumber,t hey opt for traditionali nstitutionsa nd methodst o regenerateth e Muslim masses( cf. El-Muhammady1 987:1 27 129). t27 Ahmatl Fuuzi Abtltrl Hcrmid Convcntionasl trandso f revivalismh avc beenh eavilyc riticiseda sb eing engrosscdi n rhetoric, unduly simplistic in interpretingt he modern worlcl. lacking a substantiveu nderstandingo f competing ideologies, lackingd irectiona nd lacking a concertedp lan of actiont o realiset heir envisionecslo ciety( cf. Babeair1 993).W hile the basiso f such critique may be difficult to disputc,t he alternativesg,r oundedo n analysesw hich deny explicrtly or implicitly the dccline of taqwa as the major factor behinclt hc eclipseo f Islam's influence,h ad the possibly unintended cffect of highlighting economic and intellectualr egenerationa s the major prioritiesi n any efforl of Islamic revival (cf. Amin 1989:2 21- 226). This docs not mean that considerationpse rtainingt o taqwa were neglecteda ltogetherb, ut rather.e vcni f it wasm entionedr,e ferencetso it wcie rather perfunctory (cf-. Abdul Mujib 1'994: 4l). Taqwa may be viewed,f br instancea, s merely a componento f morality (cf. Mawdudi 1991:l l l), the gcneralu pliftingo f which is deemedt o be a necessary conciitionin any processo f Islamic revival.Y et, even in concedingt his nced for a moral-cum-intellectual-cum-economiacd vancement, scholars' discussionse xhibit a bias stressingt he intellectual and economicc omponentt,o the extento f claimingt hatI slamicm oralv alues will cornea bout as a result rathert han act as a causeo l economic strength(c f. Siddiqi1 995:6 9). TAQWA VERSUS QLTWWAHI N MALAYSIA 'periphery" As part of the classicalI slamic however anomaloust his designationrn ight haveb een,M alaysiat ook time to establishit self as a leading player-in thc Muslim comity of nation-states.aA paft from its geographicadl istancefr om thc heartlandso f Islam,t he pluralisticn ature of iis poputationg ave it a unique social compositionw herebyp olitics was dominatedb y communalisml.s lam was seent o be peripherala s a rnobilisingf brce.E nvisioningM alaysiaa s a future Islamics tatew as out of the question( cf. Rosenthal1 965:2 81. Means 1969:2 83)' However, under the Premiershipo f Dr. Mahathir Mohamad (1981- 2003). this scenarioh as transformedd ramatically.T he multiplicity of 1 On the historical clivision of the utnmair into a Middle Eastcrnc cntre and a non-Middle Eastcrn pcriphery and problems associatedw ith such a simplifications. eeA hrnadF auziA bdul Hamid (2001a:3 0 39)' 128 TheT aqwav ersusQ uwwahD ichotttmy Islamic institutions in diverse fields such as banking, education, insurancee.n teftainmenta nd architecture,a nd the significant impact of Islam upon the country's legal and administrative system had emboldeneMd alaysia's leaderst o declareM alaysia as having acquired thes tatuso f an Islamics tate.5B y reachingo ut to the massesin avenues andt hroughm eanst hat the stateh ad limited capacityt o entera nd utilise, independenIts lamic movements have greatly contributed to Islamic revival.A lthough they have been accused of focusing on ritualistic aspectasn d the outer form of Islam (cf. Zainuddin Maidin 1993'M d. SallehY aapar 1993),i t was their zealousm issionarye fforts at grassroots levetlh at galvanisedth e Islamic consciousnesosf Malay-Muslimsw ho thenl ent suppoft to state-sponsoredIs lamic institutions. ln fact, even thoughu nablet o realise substantiveI slamic programmesd ue to lack of resourcetsh,e Islamic movements'm ere existencea nd demonstrationo f populars upport were enough to pressure the state into adopting an Islamic agenda which appropriately served the people's needs. Malaysianle aders have been proud of their widely acknowledged achievemenitns guiding Malaysia towards a middle path which evadcd extremisatn dr etrogressivtee ndencie(sS yedA hmad Hussein1 998:3 31.0 5 First declaredb y Dr. Mahathir Mohamad on 29 September2 00 I on thc occasiono f the 30'h National Conventiono f the Cerakan Pcople's Party (MingguanM ala.vsia3 0.09.01).S eea lso corroboratings tatementsb y Deputy PrimeM inisterA bdullahA hmad Badawi( (JtttsanM alal'5i6l '10'01)' hcado f the Malaysian Dakwah Foundation [Yayasan Dakwah Islarniah Malaysia (YADIM)1, Nakhaie Ahmad (ibid); and chairmano f the National Fatwa Council (NFC), Dr. Ismail Ibrahim (ibid 4.10.01). Thc unequivocal declarationw as reputedly made aftcr consulting 70 rcligious scholars, 'Discussion academicasn d notablesd uringt he state-sponsored on the Islamic State'( Muzakarah Daulah Islamiah) on 3 August 2001. Chaired by the ReligiousA dvisor to the Prime Minister, Datuk Dr. Abdul Hamid Othman, theD iscussionc oncludedt hat Malaysia qualified as an Islamic state on the basiso f scholarly opinions since the days of thc Umayyad and Abbasid caliphatelsib id. I . 10.0l ; seea lso the statemen t by Abdul Kader Talip, Grand Imamo f the PutrajayaM osque (Mingguan Malal,.sia5 .08.01)]. Since then, Dr. Mahathir has reiteratedt his position many times, see fbr example his speecheisn officiating the Conferenceo n Islamic Capital Markets (Utusan Malaysia 21. 03.02) and the 53"r United Malays' National Organisation (UMNO)G eneraAl ssembly,( ibid. 21.06.03). 6 Seef or instancet he keynote addressb y thc then Deputy Prime Minister, Anwarl brahim, at the Inten.rationaWl orkshop on Islam in SoutheastA sia, 'Dunict Petalingl aya (New straits Times 6.03.96); Dr. Mahathir's article, 129 AhmacFl auziA bdttlH amid At the scholarlyl evel, hopest hat Malaysia would lead the Muslim world haveb eene xpressedin terms of tapping the vast potential of the Malay nation.w hich would determinet he future courseo f Islamic civilisation (SiddiqF adzil 1992:33-37, Almascaty 1994,H ashim Hj. Musa 2002: 839). While such opinions have come from increasingly confident Malay-lndonesiani ntellectuals,e ven intemational Muslim scholarso f repute have voiced out similar optimism. As the eminent Muslim economist,M uhammadN ejatullah Siddiqi wrote: TheM uslimso f SouthE astA sia of Malaysial,n donesiaa,n d possiblyth eM uslimm inoritiesin resurgenCt hina areb etter equippedto leadt he processo f regeneratiotnh ant he resto f theM uslimw orld.T heya reu ncommittetdo anyp owersT. hey are unconstrainebdy promiscst o keep and debtst o repay. Theira pproactho Islami s simplea nde lementar-y something which besidesit s disadvantageasls ok eepst hem away from the strangulatinhgo ld of a scholarshipu nfit to lead in the modernw orld. They can learn.M any othersc an hardly so. And most importanto f all, they are alreadyo n the road to economicp rosperitys, ecuritya nds trength- somethingw hich maye ludeo therM uslimc ountriesfo r a longt imet o come. (Siddiqi1 995:24) Malaysian Muslims need not rest upon their laurels upon hearing such accoladesa nd words of admiration. They have been given a rude awakening since the onset of the SoutheastA sian economic crisis in l99l andt he political turmoil that followed. Insofar as the optimism was dependenot n the buoyant economicm ood and relatively stablep olitical climate of the 1990s,i t was based on quwwah, and was therefore not viable and not sustainableW. e should acceptt he reality that history was not all the time rosy for Muslims, but whatever trials and tribulations that befell Muslims, Muslims regained strength and re-emergeda s a significantf orce by relying on taqwa. Referringt o the various calamities that have struck contemporaryM uslims, we have recourset o the fact that vicissitudeso f life involving alternatep eriodso f decline and revival have been a recuffent theme in Islamic history (Hopwood 1971, Israr Islam Masa Kini (The contemporary Muslim world) (Utusan Malaysia 'Model 2.11.99); and the article, Nation' by Khairy Jamaluddin, special officer-cum-son-in-lawo f then Deputy Prime Minister, Abdullah Ahmad Badawti line 10.03.03). 130 TheT aqwav ersusQ uwwahD ichotomY Ahmad lgg2). Muslims had undergones evered istressw ith the downfall of Baghdad to the Mongols in 1258, the defeat of Granada to the Christiansi n 1492a nd the dismantlingo f the Ottomanc aliphatei n 1924, to mention just a few difficult episodes for Muslims. While the economicc risis was especially stressfulf or SoutheastA sia, the whole ummah appears to presently be in a state of fear and insecurity as demonstratidi n the relatively meek submissiono f Kabul and Baghdad to USA-led Allied forces in 2001 and 2002, respectively. Evidence backingt he incursionsw as thin and perhapsn on-existent,y et they were executedw ith neither remorse nor recourset o internationallya ccepted legal procedures.t As such, a totally new atmosphere of fear and apprehensionh as developed, bearing in mind the fact that Muslims lagged far behind non-Muslims in science and technology, which seimedt o be the deterrninantf actor in both the Afghan and Iraqi wars. For Malaysian Muslims, this was a double blow, as they had yet to recover from the economic diffrculties that started from Western speculatorsa' ttack on the SoutheastA sian foreign exchangem arket in 1997." 7 Afghanistanw as attackedo n 7 october 200 I for its govemment's alleged harbouringo f terroristsf rom the Al-Qaeda network led by osama bin Laden. Its Taliban governments wiftly collapseda nd was rcplacedb y a US-supported government led by Hami d Karzai, but the whereabouts of Osama was never iccurately establisheda nd is still unknown. Iraq was assaultedo n 20 March 2003 foi its government's alleged secret production of weapons of mass destruction( wfr,fl) and support of global tefforism. But despitet he loss of humanl ives and the succcssfulo ustero f SaddamH ussein,n o WMD has been found. 8 At the beginning of the crisis, Dr. Mahathir singularly rebuked activities of 'tiger' cunency speculators for deliberately undermining the booming economies.-His main target was George Soros, the Hungarian-American financier who owned Quantum Fund. As Soros was of Jewish origin, Dr. Mahathir then claimed that the crisis was sparkedo ff as part of the Jewish 'Soros conspiracyt o undermineM uslim economies.S ee criticisesM alaysian pM, (Fiiancial Times 22.9.91); 'Mahathir-Soros row hits ringgit' (ibid. 23.9.97:'Dr Mahathir and the markets: the Prime Minister of Malaysia's attempts to punish foreign speculators is both misguided and '(cid:0)Krisis counterproductive'( The Economist, editorial, 6.9.9'7); mata wdnS angkari Yahudi (Currency crisis: Jews are the culprit)" (Berita Harian tt.tO.SZ); 'Washington marah Mahathir sebut Yahudi (Washington resents Mahathir'ss ingling out Jews)' (ibid. 17.10.97).T his xenophobia,p articularly againstA nglo-saxons and Jews, has appearedt o remain in Dr. Mahathir's 131 AhmadF auziA hdulH amid A brief glancea t the recentt hinking of Muslim intellectualsin Malaysia revealst hat despitet he latestp roblemsb esettingt he ummah,t he priority of taqwa over quwwaft is far from being established.W hen proposing solutions, they adopt the view that Muslims have lost behind due to inadequaciesi n scientific and technological advancementr ather than their levels of taqw,a,r elationshipt o God and spirituality. Some feel that 'ctin there are enough of theseJ 'ard (individual obligation) requirements and Muslims need no more of them, as compared with .fard kifayah (collective obligation) requirements.W orse still, past glory of the trmmahi s interpretedi n terms of its material and mental achievements. Below are a few excerptsf rom the media: Disproportionatefo cus on leaming religion, ways to pray (sulat) and Islamic laws will renderu s lessa ble to think of essentialsw hich in reality are also demandedi n Islam. Thesei nclude effbrts to develop the ummcth'.sc apacity to get out of poverty and defend it from enemies.A ttention also needst o be given to educationi n the fields of engineerings, cience,t echnology,c omputersa nd whatevern ew branch of knowledge. lDebat Sekularismeh alang kemajuan umat (Debate on Secularismh ampers progress of the ummah), Utusan Malaysia,e ditorial,I 3.06.0l, author'st ranslation]. Can we protect Muslims from a nuclear bomb attack?W e are only given relevant examplesf rom the days of the Prophet Muhammad (peaceb e upon him). In those days, the rclevant weapon to defend Muslims were horsesa s vehiclesa nd arrows,s pearss, words,e tc.I f the situationt akesp lacet oday,t he Prophetw ould havet old the new 'You converts to Islam, must have a nuclear bomb'.... Today Muslims are very weak bccausew e ignore a lot of what the Quran mindsetu p till his resignationf rom all political postso n 3l October2 003. This was demonstratedb y his vituperative attack on the threat posed by 'Europeans' in his keynote addresst o the 54"' UMNO General Assembly (ibid. 20.06.03),d uring which copieso f Henry Ford's book, International Jew, reprinted in Kuala Lumpur rn 2002, were distributed to the delegates. Dr. Mahathir's last internationals pecch as Prime Minister, during the Organisationo f Islamic Countries( OIC) sumrnit in mid-October2 003 in 'Jews Putrajaya,c ausedW estcrn uproar by his outspokena ssertiont hat rule the world by proxy' ({JtusanM alaysia 17.10.032, 3.10.03);P aul Krugman, 'Listening 'After to Mahathir' (New York Times2 1.10.03); Mahathir' (The 'Exit Economist3 0.1 0.03); the StrongM an' (Time 10.I 1.03)1. 132

Description:
1 Sep 2001 honourable civiliscttion. This paper examines the dichotomy that has emerged betwecn two Some are Hold firmly to what We have given you, and bring ( ever) to And for those who fear Allah, He (ever) prepares a way out, and . However, under the Premiership of Dr. Mahathir Mohamad
See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.