ebook img

Juries, Science and Popular Culture in the Age of Terror: The Case of the Sydney Bomber PDF

293 Pages·2017·3.771 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Juries, Science and Popular Culture in the Age of Terror: The Case of the Sydney Bomber

Edited by DAVID TAIT and JANE GOODMAN-DELAHUNTY J U R I E S, S C I E T i N HE n t CE CAS he A and E OF GE of POPU T T L H E A E R R S R C Y O U D R L N T E U Y RE B O M B E R Juries, Science and Popular Culture in the Age of Terror David Tait • Jane Goodman-Delahunty Editors Juries, Science and Popular Culture in the Age of Terror The Case of the Sydney Bomber Editors David Tait Jane Goodman-Delahunty Western Sydney University Charles Sturt University Penrith, New South Wales, Australia Manly, New South Wales, Australia ISBN 978-1-137-55474-1 ISBN 978-1-137-55475-8 (eBook) DOI 10.1057/978-1-137-55475-8 Library of Congress Control Number: 2016957365 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017 The author(s) has/have asserted their right(s) to be identified as the author(s) of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Design and Patents Act 1988. This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and trans- mission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. Cover illustration: © Mark Strozier / Alamy Stock Photo Printed on acid-free paper This Palgrave Macmillan imprint is published by Springer Nature The registered company is Macmillan Publishers Ltd. London Acknowledgements This Linkage Project 0667764 “Juries and interactive visual evidence: Impacts on deliberation processes and outcomes” was funded by the Australian Research Council. The Chief Investigators who collaborated in designing and conducting the studies were Professor David Tait, Professor Jane Goodman-Delahunty, Professor Janelle Kyd, Dr. Jacqueline Horan, Professor Graham Brawn, Professor Greg Battye, Professor James R. P. Ogloff, Professor Chris Lennard, Professor Anne Wallace and Professor Damian Schofield. Principal Investigators were Diane Jones, Justice Richard Refshauge and Dr. James Robertson. The industry partners were the Australasian Institute of Judicial Administration, PTW Architects, Lyons Architects, the Australian Federal Police, the Australian Capital Territory Director of Public Prosecutions and ICE Design. Our Project Manager, Dr. Karen Mow provided oversight and skilled management to ensure that the research project ran smoothly, on time and on budget. We are grateful to the APAI students funded by the grant and who assisted with the development of the experimental materials: Arwen Mow-Lowy, Sharmila Betts and Elizabeth Ockenden. We thank the many research assistants who provided additional support for this project in fielding the study, and collecting and entering the data, including Kate v vi Acknowledgements O’Brien, Stella Palmer and Berenike Waubert de Puiseau. Dr. Karen Gelb provided invaluable support in editing. The New South Wales Department of the Attorney General/ Department of Justice generously provided access to the King Street Court providing a realistic setting to conduct the live simulated trial. We thank the many jury-eligible citizens who volunteered their time as mock jurors. Contents 1 Understanding Terrorism Trials 1 David Tait 2 The Legal Landscape in Terrorism Trials 11 Jacqueline Horan and Jane Goodman-Delahunty 3 Terrorist Trials: Forensic Science and the Trial Process 37 Chris Lennard and Anne Wallace 4 Animating the Bomber: The Sydney Bomber Trial 55 Christina Spiesel, Greg Battye and Neal Feigenson 5 Gruesome Evidence: The Use of Beheading Videos and Other Disturbing Pictures in Terrorism Trials 67 Christina Spiesel 6 Assessing Unfair Prejudice from Extremist Images in Terrorism Trials 87 Jane Goodman-Delahunty vii viii Contents 7 Displaying the Bomb on the Train: The Challenge of Preparing Visual Evidence 123 Damian Schofield 8 Research Aims and Methods 145 David Tait and Jane Goodman-Delahunty 9 The Sydney Bomber Study: Introducing the Mock Jurors 161 David Tait 10 Images of Interactive Virtual Environments: Do They Affect Verdict? 173 David Tait and Jane Goodman-Delahunty 11 How Juries Talked About Visual Evidence 193 Greg Battye and Meredith Rossner 12 CSI Effects on Jury Reasoning and Verdicts 217 Jane Goodman-Delahunty and David Tait 13 The Effect of Deliberation on Jury Verdicts 235 David Tait and Jane Goodman-Delahunty 14 Making Sense of the Evidence: Jury Deliberation and Common Sense 249 David Tait and Meredith Rossner 15 C onclusions 273 David Tait and Jane Goodman-Delahunty Index 287 About the Authors Greg Battye is a professor in arts and design at the University of Canberra in Australia. He writes on photography and its connections with aspects of literary theory and psychology, and is the author of Photography, Narrative, Time: Imaging our Forensic Imagination (2014). Neal Feigenson is a professor of law at Quinnipiac University. He writes about the psychology of legal decision-making and visual evidence. He is the author of Legal Blame (2000) and the forthcoming Experiencing Other Minds in the Courtroom (2016), and co-author, with Christina Spiesel, of Law on Display (2009). Jane Goodman-Delahunty is a research professor at Charles Sturt University, Australia, and a Member of the New South Wales Civil and Administrative Tribunal. Her recent books include Legal Psychology in Australia (2015), Trends in Legal Advocacy: Interviews with Leading Prosecutors and Defence Lawyers around the Globe (2016) and Expert Evidence and Criminal Jury Trials (2016). Jacqueline Horan is a senior lecturer at Melbourne University School of Law and a jury researcher and the author of Juries in the 21st Century (2012). She was the lead investigator in a large-scale empirical project examining jurors’ percep- tions of expert evidence, and co-author of Expert Evidence and Criminal Jury Trials (2016). Chris Lennard is a professor of forensic science in the School of Science and Health at Western Sydney University. He has operational forensic science ix x About the Authors experience with the Australian Federal Police as well as teaching and research experience in fields that include fingerprint detection and the chemical analysis of trace evidence. Meredith Rossner is an assistant professor of criminology at the London School of Economics. She received her PhD degree in criminology and sociol- ogy from the University of Pennsylvania. She is the author of Just Emotions: Rituals of Restorative Justice (Oxford University Press, 2013). Her research inter- ests include emotions and interactions in criminal justice, criminology theory, restorative justice and juries. Damian Schofield is a professor in the State University of New York (SUNY), where he is a director of human computer interaction, as well as a director of Aims Solutions Ltd., a UK-based company to provide computer graphics visu- alization services and virtual reality-based simulation training products to a wide range of public and private sector organizations. He has been an expert witness in courts all over the world and has worked on many high profile cases. Christina Spiesel is an adjunct professor of law at Quinnipiac University, a senior research scholar in law and an Affiliated Fellow of the Information Society Project at Yale Law School. She writes about the intersection of law, pictures and technology and is co-author, with Neal Feigenson, of Law on Display (2009). David Tait is a professor of justice research at Western Sydney University, Australia, and an adjunct professor at Telecom Paristech, France. His research focuses on how to make justice environments and processes more humane. His recent work includes Fortress or Sanctuary: Enhancing Court Safety by Managing People, Places and Processes (2014), and reviews of the prejudicial effect of the dock in criminal trials. Anne Wallace is based in the School of Business and Law at Edith Cowan University in Perth, Western Australia. She has teaching expertise in Criminal Law & Procedure, Evidence, Forensic Evidence and Justice Administration. She was a chief investigator in the Sydney Bomber Project and performed the role of defence counsel in the live simulated trial.

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.