Judicature 1995 - 1996: Vol 79 Index

5 Pages·1.9 MB·English

Annual Index, Volume 79 A brief history of state jury reform efforts, Munster- Trial by jury or judge: which is speedierEi?s,en -
man, G. Thomas, 216-219. berg, Theoadndo Clrermeon t, Kevin M., 176-
The contested role of the civil jury in business litiga- 180, 199.
Cumulative indexes have been tion, Hans, Valerie P., 242-248.
‘Courting Customers’ exercise improves court ser- Constitutional
compiled for JUDICATURE volumes vices (focus), Frank, Lauren, 48, 50. The tribal courts today, Endre-
1-20 and 21-45. Volumes 45-78 are Criticizing judges, Pollak, Louis H., 298-302. son, Douglas B.L., 142-146.
indexed in separate annual indexes. Enhancing the jury system (editorial), 212. Explaining transformations in Supreme Court
Evaluating the performance of judges standing for policy, Goldstein, Leslie Friedman and Stech,
For microfilm editions, write retention, (panel discussion), 190-197.
University Microfilms, Inc., P.O. Box Facilitating caseflow (letter), Cousins, William J., 5. The first-term ‘performance of Justice Stephen
A holistic approach to criminal justice scholarship
1307, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106.
(viewpoint), Pizzi, William T., 58-59, 102.
The impact of sequestration on juries, Levine,
James P., 266-272. lawgiinv aectiron , Schwartz, Bernard, 24-29.
Jury reform: the Arizona experience, Dann, B. Multiple sovereignties: Indian tribes, states, and the
Ss U B Cc Michael and Logan Ill, George, 280-286. federal Resnik, Judith, 118-125.
A new label (letter), Newman, Jon O., 5. The smaller the jury, the greater the unpre-
Access to justice Public access: the ultimate guardian of fairness in dictability, Saks, MichaelJ. , 263-265.
Anticipating the future of the courts (editorial), 168. our justice system, Zemans, Frances Kahn, 173- Stratified juror selection: cross-section by design,
The chailenges facing tribal courts today, Endres- 175. King, Nancy J. and Munsterman, G. Thomas,
on, Douglas B.L., 142-146. Simpson's trial and the rush to reform (editorial), 273-278.
‘Courting Customers’ exercise improves court ser- 56-57. Tribal courts: providers of justice and protectors of
vices (focus), Frank, Lauren, 48, 50. Stratified juror selection: cross-section by design, sovereignty, Pommersheim, Frank, 110-112.
Facilitating caseflow (letter), Cousins, William J., 5. King, Nancy J. and Munsterman, G. Thomas,
A federal commitment to tribal justice systems, 273-278. Corrections
Reno, Janet, 113-117. Improving collection of court-ordered restitution,
A new label (letter), Newman, Jon O., 5. Civil justice system Davis, Robert C. and Bannister, Tanya M., 30-33.
Protecting the child vs. punishing the offender The contested role of the civil jury in business litiga-
(viewpoint), Libow, Julius, 297, 329-330. tion, Hans, Valerie P., 242-248. Court facilities
Determining the proper allocation of cases between ‘Courting Customers’ exercise improves court ser-
Alternatives to adjudication federai and state courts (viewpoint), Newman, vices (focus), Frank, Lauren, 48, 50.
Facilitating caseflow (letter), Cousins, William J., 5. Jon O., 6-7, 46.
Indigenous justice systems and tribal society, Facilitating caseflow (letter), Cousins, William J., 5. Court financing and
Melton, Ada Pecos, 126-133. The fragmentation of the federal rules, Friedman, Does rural court consolidation save costs?,
A new era of federal-tribal court cooperation, Barry and Chemerinsky, Erwin, 67-73.
Wallace, J. Clifford, 150-153. Increasing juror participation in trials through note
The reemergence of tribal society and traditional taking and question asking, Heuer, Larry and from the Hill and the federal bench (panel discus-
justice systems, Vicenti, Carey N., 134-141. Penrod, Steven, 256-262. sion), 303-309.
Standards of Conduct for Mediators, Feerick, John A new label (letter), Newman, Jon O., 5.
D., 314-317. A step above anecdote: a profile of the civil jury in Court information systems
A successful binding summary jury trial, Feagley, the 1990s, Ostrom, Brian J., Rottman, David B., ‘Courting Customers’ —w
Michael R. and Rogers, Walter M., 181-184. and Goerdt, John A., 233-241.
A successful binding summary jury trial, Feagley,
Alternatives to incarceration Michael R. and Rogers, Walter M., 181-184.
Improving collection of court-ordered restitution, Trial by jury or judge: which is speedier?, Eisen-
Davis, Robert C. and Bannister, Tanya M., 30-33. berg, Theodore and Clermont, Kevin M., 176- Keep government out of the citation business,
Indigenous justice systems and tribal society, 180, 199. rd, and . Andrew
Melton, Ada Pecos, 126-133. R., $1, 63-66.
The reemergence of tribal society and traditional Civil procedure National Fine Center centralizes payment collection
justice systems, Vicenti, Carey N., 134-141. The fragmentation of the federal rules, Friedman, (focus), Frank, Lauren, 92.
Barry and Chemerinsky, Erwin, 67-73. A simplsysitefm oif ceitadtio n, Sherman, Gary, 60,
AJS Increasing juror participation in trials th note 62-63
Anticipating the future of the courts (editorial), 168. taking and question asking, Heuer, Larry and Stratified juror selection: cross-section by design,
Enhancing the jury system (editorial), 212. Penrod, Steven, 256-262. King, Nancy J. and Munsterman, G. Thomas,
Evaluating the performance of judges standing for The smaller the jury, the greater the unpre- 273-278.
retention, (panel discussion), 190-197. dictability, Saks, Michael J., 263-265.
A new approach to long-range planning for the fed- A successful binding summary jury trial, Feagley, Court management
eral courts (editorial), 4-5; Not far enough (letter), Michael R. and Rogers, Walter M., 181-184. A brief history of state jury reform efforts, Munster-
Cohn, Avern, 101; Unsound criticisms (letter), man, G. Thomas, 216-219.
Mengler, Thomas M., 57, 100. Complex ! ‘Courting Customers’ exercise improves court ser-
Public access: the ultimate guardian of fairness in A successful binding summary jury trial, Feagley, vices (focus), Frank, Lauren, 48, 50.
our justice system, Zemans, Frances Kahn, 173- Michael R. and Rogers, Walter M., 181-184. Determining the proper allocation of cases between
175. federal and state courts (viewpoint), Newman,
Simpson's trial and the rush to reform (editorial), Computers and courts—see Court Jon O., 6-7, 46.
56- technology Enhancing the jury system (editorial), 212.
The impact of sequestration on juries, Levine,
Appellate courts Congestion and delay James P., 266-272.
Congress considers bill to split Ninth Circuit (focus), Facilitating caseflow (letter), Cousins, William J., 5. Increasing juror participation in trials through note
Tobias, Carl, 198-199. A new label (letter), Newman, Jon O., 5. taking and question asking, Heuer, Larry and
Explaining transformations in Supreme Court A successful binding summary jury trial, Feagley, Penrod, Steven, 256-262.
policy, Goldstein, Leslie Friedman and Stech, Michael R. and Rogers, Walter M., 181-184. Jury reform: the Arizona experience. Dann, B.
Diana, 80-85. Michael and Logan Ill, George, 280-286.
The first-term performance of Justice Stephen A new approach to long-range planning for the fed-
Breyer, Smith, Christopher E., Baugh, Joyce A., KEY eral courts (editorial), 4-5.
and Hensley, Thomas R., 74-79. The pages used in the index listings Stratified juror selection: cross-section by design,
Justice Brennan and the Brandenburg decision—a refer to the following months. King, Nancy J. and Munsterman, G. Thomas,
lawgiver in action, Schwartz, Bernard, 24-29. Pages Month 273-278.
Justice Brennan and the institutionalization of dis- Warren Burger: a man of ‘common sense and prac-
sent assignment, Cook, Beverly Blair, 17-23. 1-52 July-August 1995 tical ideas’, Wheeler, Russell, 8-9.
Bar activities 53-104 September-October Court
Standards of Conduct for Mediators, Feerick, John 105-164 November-December ‘Courting Customers’ exercise improves court ser-
D., 314-317. 165-208 January-February 1996 vices (focus), Frank, Lauren, 48, 50.
209-292 March-April Does rural court consolidation save costs?,
Citizens and courts 293-336 May-June Edeiman, Mark A. and Raun, Terry L., 86-90.
Anticipating the future of the courts (editorial), 168.
Volume 79, Number 6 Judicature 331
Court nnel anne, 185-189. Judicial selection—federal
‘Courting Customers’ exercise improves court ser- Perspectives on court-Congress relations: the view Perspectives on court ress relations: the view
vices (focus), Frank, Lauren, 48, 50. from the Hill and the federai bench (panei discus- from the Hill and the federal bench (panel discus-
Criticizing judges, Pollak, Louis H., 298-302. sion), 303-309. sion), 303-309.
Evaluating the performance of judges standing for The problems of applying Daubert to psychological
retention, (panel discussion), 190-197. syndrome evidence, Richardson, James T., Judicial selection—state
Ginsburg, Gerald P., Gatowski, Sophia, and Dob- Evaluating the performance of judges standing for
Courts of limited jurisdiction bin, Shirley, 10-16. retention, (panel discussion), 190-197.
Facilitating caseflow (letter), Cousins, William J., 5. A successful binding summary jury trial, Feagley, Recent Voting Rights Act challenges to judicial
A new label (letter), Newman, Jon O., 5. Michael R. and Rogers, Walter M., 181-184. elections, Scruggs, Anna M., Mazzola, Jean-
Trial by jury or judge: which is speedier?, Eisen- Claude, and Zaug, Mary E., 34-41.
Court structure berg, Theodore and Clermont, Kevin M., 176-
Congress considers bill to split Ninth Circuit (focus), 180, 199. Jury trial
Tobias, Carl, 198-199. A brief history of state jury reform efforts, Munster-
Does rural court consolidation save costs?, Judicial education and qualifications man, G. Thomas, 216-219.
Edelman, Mark A. and Raun, Terry L., 86-90. Evaluating the performance of judges standing for The capital jury: is it tilted toward death?, Bowers,
retention, (panel discussion), 190-197. William J., 220-223.
Criminal procedure The contested role of the civil jury in business litiga-
The capitai jury: is it tilted toward death?, Bowers, Judicial ethics tion, Hans, Valerie P., 242-248.
William J., 220-223. Recommendations by judges: what are the limits?, Enhancing the jury system (editorial), 212.
A holistic approach to criminal justice scholarship Gray, Cynthia, 310-313. The impact of sequestration on juries, Levine,
(viewpoint), Pizzi, William T., 58-59, 102. James P., 266-272.
The impact of sequestration on juries, Levine, Judicial evaluation Improving decisions on death by revising and test-
James P., 266-272. Evaluating the performance of judges standing for ing jury instructions, Diamond, Shari Seidman
Improving decisions on death by revising and test- retention, (panel discussion), 190-197. and Levi, Judith N., 224-232.
ing jury instructions, Diamond, Shari Seidman Increasing juror participation in trials through note
and Levi, Judith N., 224-232. Judicial history and philosophy taking and question asking, Heuer, Larry and
The peremptory challenge in the eyes of the trial A brief history of state jury reform efforts, Munster- Penrod, Steven, 256-262.
judge, Smith, Christopher E. and Ochoa, Rox- man, G. Thomas, 216-219. Jury reform: the Arizona experience, Dann, B.
anne, 185-189. The challenges facing tribal courts today, Endre- Michael and Logan Ill, George, 280-286.
Pretrial prejudice in Canada: a comparative per- son, Douglas B.L., 142-146. Jury research and reform: an introduction, King,
spective on the criminal jury, Vidinar, Neii, 249- Criticizing judges, Pollak, Louis H., 298-302. Nancy J., 214.
255. Development of tribal courts: past, present, and fu- The peremptory challenge in the eyes of the trial
Protecting the child vs. punishing the offender ture, Myers, Joseph A. and Coochise, Elbridge, judge, Smith, Christopher E. and Ochoa, Rox-
(viewpoint), Libow, Julius, 297, 329-330. 147-149. anne, 185-189.
The smalier the jury, the greater the unpre- Explaining transformations in Supreme Court Pretrial prejudice in Canada: a comparative per-
dictability, Saks, Michael J., 263-265. policy, Goldstein, Leslie Friedman and Stech, spective on the criminal jury, Vidmar, Neil, 249-
Diana, 80-85. 255.
Evidence A federal commitment to tribal justice systems, Simpson's trial and the rush to reform (editorial),
Increasing juror participation in trials through note Reno, Janet, 113-117.
taking and question asking, Heuer, Larry and The first-term performance of Justice Stephen The smaller the jury, the greater the unpre-
Penrod, Steven, 256-262. : Breyer, Smith, Christopher E., Baugh, Joyce A., dictability, Saks, Michael J., 263-265.
The problems of applying Daubert to psychological and Hensley, Thomas R., 74-79. A step above anecdote: a profile of the civil jury in
syndrome evidence, Richardson, James T., The fragmentation of the federal rules, Friedman, the 1990s, Ostrom, Brian J., Rottman, David B.,
Ginsburg, Gerald P., Gatowski, Sophia, and Dob- Barry and Chemerinsky, Erwin, 67-73. and Goerdt, John A., 233-241.
bin, Shirley, 10-16. Justice Brennan and the Brandenburg decision—a Stratified juror selection: cross-section by design,
lawgiver in action, Schwartz, Bernard, 24-29. King, Nancy J. and Munsterman, G. Thomas,
Expert witnesses Justice Brennan and the institutionalization of dis- 273-278.
The problems of applying Daubert to psychological sent assignment, Cook, Beverly Blair, 17-23. A successful binding summary jury trial, Feagley,
syndrome evidence, Richardson, James T., Multiple sovereignties: Indian tribes, states, and the Michael R. and Rogers, Walter M., 181-184.
Ginsburg, Gerald P., Gatowski, Sophia, and Dob- federal government, Resnik, Judith, 118-125. Trial by jury or judge: which is speedier?, Eisen-
bin, Shirley, 10-16. A new approach to long-range planning for the fed- berg, Theodore and Clermont, Kevin M., 176-
eral courts (editorial), 4-5; Not far enough (letter), 180, 199.
Foreign justice systems Cohn, Avern, 101; Unsound criticisms (letter),
Pretrial prejudice in Canada: a comparative per- Mengler, Thomas M., 57, 100. Juvenile justice
spective on the criminal jury, Vidmar, Neil, 249- A new era of federal-tribal court cooperation, Protecting the child vs. punishing the offender
255. Wallace, J. Clifford, 150-153. (viewpoint), Libow, Julius, 297, 329-330.
Perspectives on court-Congress relations: the view
Future and the courts from the Hill and the federal bench (panel discus- Law and psychology
Anticipating the future of the courts (editorial), 168. sion), 303-309. The problems of applying Daubert to psychological
A new approach to long-range planning for the fed- Resolving state-tribal jurisdictional dilemmas, syndrome evidence, Richardson, James T.,
eral courts (editorial), 4-5; Not far enough (letter), Feldman, Stanley G. and Withey, David L., 154- Ginsburg, Gerald P., Gatowski, Sophia, and Dob-
Cohn, Avern, 101; Unsound criticisms (letter), 156. bin, Shirley, 10-16.
Mengler, Thomas M., 57, 100. Tribal courts: providers of justice and protectors of
sovereignty, Pommersheim, Frank, 110-112. Legal education
Judicial decision making Warren Burger: a man of ‘common sense and prac- A holistic approach to criminal justice scholarship
Criticizing judges, Pollak, Louis H., 298-302. tical ideas’, Wheeler, Russell, 8-9. (viewpoint), Pizzi, William T., 58-59, 102.
Determining the proper allocation of cases between
federal and state courts (viewpoint), Newman, Judicial immunity Legal ethics
Jon O., 6-7, 46. Criticizing judges, Pollak, Louis H., 298-302. Standards of Conduct for Mediators, Feerick, John
Explaining transformations in Supreme Court D., 314-317.
policy, Goldstein, Leslie Friedman and Stech, Judicial/legislative relations
Diana, 80-85. Congress considers bill to split Ninth Circuit (focus), Legai history
The first-term performance of Justice Stephen Tobias, Cari, 198-199. Development of tribal courts: past, present, and fu-
Breyer, Smith, Christopher E., Baugh, Joyce A., Criticizing judges, Pollak, Louis H., 298-302. ture, Myers, Joseph A. and Coochise, Elbridge,
and Hensley, Thomas R., 74-79. Jury reform: the Arizona experience, Dann, B. 147-149.
Increasing juror participation in trials through note Michael and Logan Ill, George, 280-286. Indigenous justice systems and tribal society,
taking and question asking, Heuer, Larry and Multiple sovereignties: Indian tribes, states, and the Melton, Ada Pecos, 126-133.
Penrod, Steven, 256-262. federal government, Resnik, Judith, 118-125. Multiple sovereignties: Indian tribes, states, and the
Justice Brennan and the Brandenburg decision—a A new approach to long-range planning for the fed- federal government, Resnik, Judith, 118-125.
lawgiver in action, Schwartz, Bernard, 24-29. eral courts (editorial), 4-5; Not far enough (letter), The reemergence of tribal society and traditional
Justice Brennan and the institutionalization of dis- Cohn, Avern, 101; Unsound criticisms (letter), justice systems, Vicenti, Carey N., 134-141.
sent assignment, Cook, Beverly Blair, 17-23. Mengier, Thomas M., 57, 100.
A new approach to long-range planning for the fed- Perspectives on court-Congress relations: the view Legal profession
eral courts (editorial), 4-5. from the Hill and the federal bench (panel discus- Footnote fight (letter), Billings, Carol D., 108; The
The peremptory challenge in the eyes of the trial sion), 303-309. authors respond (letter), Bergsgaard, Donna M.
judge, Smith, Christopher E. and Ochoa, Rox- and Desmond, Andrew R., 108.
332 Judicature Volume 79, Number 6 May-June 1996
Keep government out of the citation business, William J., 220-223. Clermont, Kevin M. and Eisenberg, Theodore, Trial
Bergsgaard, Donna M. and Desmond, Andrew Improving collection of court-ordered restitution, by jury or judge: which is speedier?, 176-180,
R., 61, 63-66. Davis, Robert C. and Bannister, Tanya M., 30-33. 199.
A simplified system of citation, Sherman, Gary, 60, Cohn, Avern, Not far enough (letter), 101.
62-63. Sentencing Coochise, Elbridge and Myers, Joseph A., Develop-
The capital jury: is it tilted toward death?, Bowers, ment of tribal courts: past, present, and future,
Legal services William J., 220-223. 147-149.
‘Courting Customers’ exercise improves court ser- Improving collection of court-ordered restitution, Cook, Beverly Biair, Justice Brennan and the insti-
vices (focus), Frank, Lauren, 48, 50. Davis, Robert C. and Bannister, Tanya M., 30-33. tutionofa dislsenit zassaigntmeint,o 1n7-2 3.
Footnote fight (letier), Billings, Carol D., 108; The Cousins, WilliamJ. , Facilitating casefiow (letter), 5
authors respond (letter), Bergsgaard, Donna M. Smail claims courts Dann, B. Michael and Logan Ill, George, Jury re-
and Desmond, Andrew R., 108. Facilitating caseflow (letter), Cousins, William J., 5. form: the Arizona experience, 280-286.
Indigenous justice systems and tribal society, A new label (letter), Newman, Jon O., 5. Davis, RobertC . and Bannister, Tanya M., improv-
Melton, Ada Pecos, 126-133. ing collection of court-ordered restitution, 30-33.
Keep government out of the citation business, Social science and courts Desmond, AndrewR . and , Donna M.,
Bergsgaard, Donna M. and Desmond, Andrew The problems of applying Daubertt o psychological Keep government out oft he citation business, 61.
R., 61, 63-66. syndrome evidence, Richardson, James T., 63-66; A response to “A simplified system of cita-
A simplified system of citation, Sherman, Gary, 60, Ginsburg, Gerald P., Gatowski, Sophia, and Dob- tion,” 65; The autrhespoond r(lestte r), 108.
62-63. bin, Shirley, 10-16. Diamond, Shari Seidamnda Lnev i, Judith N.,
quai Gunhinpastaiapenainivensies
Legislation Statutory reform ing jury instructions, 224-232.
The challenges facing tribal courts today, Endre- A brief history of state jury reform efforts, Munster-
son, Douglas B.L., 142-146. man, G. Thomas, 216-219.
Congress considers bill to split Ninth Circuit (focus),
Tobias, Carl, 198-199. Tort reform
Development of tribal courts: past, present, and fu- A step above anecdote: a profile of the civil jury in Edelman, Mark A. and Raun, Terry L., Does rural
ture, Myers, Joseph A. and Coochise, Elbridge, the 1990s, Ostrom, Brian J., Rottman, David B., court consolidsaavte icoostns? , 86-90.
147-149. and Goerdt, John A., 233-241. Eisenberg, Theodore and Clermont, Kevin M., Trial
A federal commitment to tribal justice systems, by jury or judge: which is speedier?, 176-180,
Reno, Janet, 113-117. Trial courts, general jurisdiction 199
The fragmentation of the federal rules, Friedman, Determining the proper allocation of cases between Endreson, Douglas B.L., The challenges facing
Barry and Chemerinsky, Erwin, 67-73. federal and state courts (viewpoint), Newman, tribal courts today, 142-146.
A new era of federal-tribal court cooperation, Jon O., 6-7, 46. Feagley, Michael R. and Rogers, Walter M.A, su c-
Wallace, J. Clifford, 150-153. The peremptory challenge in the eyes of the trial cessful binding summajurry tyri al, 181-184.
Perspectives on court-Congress relations: the view judge, Smith, Christopher E. and Ochoa, Rox- Conductfo r Media-
from the Hill and the federal bench (panel discus- anne, 185-189.
sion), 303-309. Trial by jury or judge: which is speedier?, Eisen- Feldman, StanleyG . and Withey, David L., Resolv-
Protecting the child vs. punishing the offender berg, Theodore and Clermont, Kevin M., 176- ing state-tribal jurisdictional dilemmas, 154-156.
(viewpoint), Libow, Julius, 297, 329-330. 180, 199. Frank, Lauren, ‘Courting Customers’ exercise im-
The reemergence of tribal society and traditional proves court services (focus), 48, 50; National
justice systems, Vicenti, Carey N., 134-141. Victim compensation Fine Center centralizes payment collection (fo-
Resolving state-tribal jurisdictional dilemmas, Improving collection of court-ordered restitution, cus), 92.
Feldman, Stanley G. and Withey, David L., 154- Davis, RobertC . and Bannister, Tanya M., 30-33. FrieBardry mand aChenmer,insk y, ErwiThen f,rag -
156. National Fine Center centralizes payment collection mentation of the federal rules, 67-73.
(focus), Frank, Lauren, 92. Gatowski, Sophia, Richardson, James T., Gins-
Media and courts
The impact of California v. Simpson on cameras in Victims and witnesses
the courtroom, Alexander, S.L., 169-172. Improving collection of court-ordered restitution,
The impact of sequestration on juries, Levine, Davis, Robert C. and Bannister, Tanya M., 30-33.
James P., 266-272. Protecting the child vs. punishing the offender
Pretrial prejudice in Canada: a comparative per- (viewpoint), Libow, Julius, 297, 329-330.
spective on the criminal jury, Vidmar, Neil, 249-
255.
Public access: the ultimate guardian of fairness in David B., A step above anecdote: a profile of the
A U T H Oo R s
our justice system, Zemans, Frances Kahn, 173- civil jury in the 1990s, 233-241.
175. Goldstein, Leslie Friedanmd aStnec h, Diana, Ex-
Simpson's trial and the rush to reform (editorial), Alexander, S.L., The impact of Californiav ee
56-57. Simpson on cameras in the courtroom, 169-172.
Bannister, Tanya M. and Davis, Robert C., improv- cyC ynthia, by judges: what
Mediation ing collection of court-ordered restitution, 30-33. are the limits?, 310-313.
Standards of Conduct for Mediators, Feerick, John Baugh, Joyce A., Smith, Christopher E., and Hans, ValerieP. , The controele osf tthe ecividl j ury
D., 314-317. Hensley, Thomas R., The first-term in business litigation, 242-248.
of Justice Stephen Breyer, 74-79. Hensley, Thomas R., Smith, Christopher E., and
Native American courts Bergsgaard, Donna M. and Desmond, Andrew R.,
The challenges facing tribal courts today, Endre- Keep government out of the citation business, 61,
son, Douglas B.L., 142-146. 63-66; A response to “A simplified system of cita- > juror
Development of tribal courts: past, present, and fu- tion,” 65; The authors respond (letter), 108. ean in trials through note taking and
ture, Myers, Joseph A. and Coochise, Elbridge, Billings, Carol D., Footnote fight (letter), 108. question asking, 256-262.
147-149. Bowers, William J., The capital jury: is it tilted to- King, Nancy J., Jury research and reform: an intro-
A federal commitment to tribal justice systems, ward death?, 220-223. duction, 214.
Reno, Janet, 113-117. Chemerinsky, Erwin and Friedman, Barry, The frag- King, Nancy J. and Munsterman, G. Thomas, Strati-
Indigenous justice systems and tribal society, mentation of the federal rules, 67-73. fied juror selection: cross-sbey cdetsiign,o n273 -
Melton, Ada Pecos, 126-133. 278.
Multiple sovereignties: Indian tribes, states, and the Levi, Judith N. and Diamond, Shari Seidman, Im-
federal government, Resnik, Judith, 118-125. KEY proving decisions on death by revising and test-
A new era of federal-tribal court cooperation, The pages used in the index listings ing jury instructions, 224-232.
Wallace, J. Clifford, 150-153. refer to the following months. Levine, James P., The impact of sequestrationo n
Theju striecee mseyrsgteenmcse, Voifc etnrtiib,a l Casroceiye tNy. , an13d4 -t1r4a1d.i tional Pages Month
Resolving state-tribal jurisdictional dilemmas, 1-52 July-August 1995 offender (viewpoint), 297, 329-330.
Feldman, Stanley G. and Withey, David L., 154- 53-104 September-October Logan Ili,G eorangd Dean n, B. Michael, Jury re-
156. form: the Arizona experience, 280-286.
Tribal courts: providers of justice and protectors of 105-164 November-December Mazzola, Jean-Claude, Scruggs, Anna M., and
sovereignty, Pommersheim, Frank, 110-112. 165-208 January-February 1996 Zaug, Mary E., Recent Voting Rights Act chal-
209-292 March-April lenges to judicial election34s-4,1 .
Probation and parole 293-336 May-June
The capital jury: is it tilted toward death?, Bowers, tribal society, 126-133.
Volume 79, Number 6 Judicature 333
Mengler, Thomas M., Unsound criticisms (letter), BOO K REvicéEws Sentencing Matters, by Michael Tonry, reviewed by
57, 100. Marc Mauer, 158, 160.
Munsterman, G. Thomas, A brief history of state Speedy Disposition: Monetary Incentives and
jury reform efforts, 216-219. BOOK AUTHORS Policy Reform in Criminal Courts, by Thomas W.
Munsterman, G. Thomas and King, Nancy J., Strati- Abramson, Jeffery, We the Jury: The Jury System Church and Milton Heumann, reviewed by Harold
fied juror selection: cross-section by design, 273- and the Ideal of Democracy, reviewed by Albert L. Rubenstein, 42, 45.
278. W. Alschuler, 200-204. We the Jury: The Jury System and the Ideal of De-
Myers, Joseph A. and Coochise, Elbridge, Develop- Adler, Steven, The Jury: Trial and Error in the mocracy, by Jeffery Abramson, reviewed by
ment of tribal courts: past, present, and future, American Courtroom, reviewed by Albert W. Albert W. Aischuler, 200-204.
147-149. Alschuler, 200-204.
Newman, Jon O., Determining the proper allocation Church, Thomas W., and Heumann, Milton, Speedy BOOK REVIEWERS
of cases between federal and state courts (view- Disposition: Monetary incentives and Policy Re- Alschuler, Albert W., The Jury: Trial and Error in the
point), 6-7, 46; A new label (letter), 5. form in Criminal Courts, reviewed by Harold L. American Courtroom, by Steven Adier, 200-204;
Ochoa, Roxanne and Smith, Christopher E., The Rubenstein, 42, 45. We the Jury: The Jury System and the Ideai of
peremptory challenge in the eyes of the trial Creeden, Sharon, Fair is Fair: World Folktales of Democracy, by Jeffery Abramson, 200-204.
judge, 185-189. Justice, reviewed by Jona Goldschmidt, 45-46. Burbank, Stephen B., A Civil Action, by Jonathan
Ostrom, Brian J., Rottman, David B., and Goerdt, Daniels, Stephen and Martin, Joanne, Civil Juries Harr, 318, 320-321.
John A., A step above anecdote: a profile of the and the Politics of Reform, reviewed by David Goldschmidt, Jona, Fair is Fair: World Folktales of
civil jury in the 1990s, 233-241. Partlett, 288. Justice, by Sharon Creeden, 45-46.
Penrod, Steven and Heuer, Larry, Increasing juror Finkel, Norman J., Commonsense Justice: Jurors’ Hays, Steven W., Court Reform and Judicial
participation in trials through note taking and Notiofo thne sLa w, revibey wMareshad B . Liss, Leadership: Judge George Nicola and the New
question asking, 256-262. 287-288. Jersey Justice System, by Paul B. Wice, 96-97.
Pizzi, William T., A holistic approach to criminal jus- Gangi, Williarn, Saving the Constitution from the Liss, Marsha B., Commonsense Justice: Jurors’
tice scholarship (viewpoint), 58-59, 102. Courts, reviewed by Jeremy Rabkin, 325, 330. Notions of the Law, by Norman J. Finkel, 287-
Pollak, Louis H., Criticizing judges, 298-302. Harr, Jonathan, A Civil Action, reviewed by Stephen 288.
Pommersheim, Frank, Tribal courts: providers of B. Burbank, 318, 320-321. Mauer, Marc, Sentencing Matters, by Michael
justice and protectors of sovereignty, 110-112. Heumann, Milton and Church, Thomas W., Speedy Tonry, 158, 160.
Raun, Terry L. and Edelman, Mark A., Does rural i ition: Menetary Incentives and Policy Re- Partlett, David, Civil Juries and the Politics of Re-
court consolidation save costs?, 86-90. form in Criminal Courts, reviewed by Harold L. form, by Stephen Daniels and Joanne Martin,
Reno, Janet, A federal commitment to tribal justice Rubenstein, 42, 45. 288.
systems, 113-117. Martin, Joanne and Daniels, Stephen, Civil Juries Pillsbury, Samuel H., Reconstructing Justice: An
Resnik, Judith, Multiple sovereignties: Indian tribes, and the Politics of Reform, reviewed by David Agenda for Trial Reform, by Franklin Strier, 322-
states, and the federal government, 118-125. Partlett, 288. 324.
Richardson, James T., Ginsburg, Gerald P., Strier, Franklin, Reconstructing Justice: An Agenda Rabkin, Jeremy, Saving the Constitution from the
Gatowski, Sophia, and Dobbin, Shirley, The prob- for Trial Reform, reviewed by Samue! H. Pills- Courts, by William Gangi, 325, 330.
lems of applying Daubert to psychological syn- bury, 322-324. Rubenstein, Harold L., Speedy Disposition: Mon-
drome evidence, 10-16. Tonry, Michael, Sentencing Matters, reviewed by etary Incentives and Policy Reform in Criminal
Rogers, Walter M. and Feagley, Michael R., A suc- Marc Mauer, 158, 160. Courts, by Thomas W. Church and Milton
cessful binding summary jury trial, 181-184. Wice, Paul B., Court Reform and Judicial Lead- Heumann, 42, 45.
Rottman, David B., Ostrom, Brian J., and Goerdt, ership: Judge George Nicola and the New Jersey Shiffman, Stuart H., Judicial Enigma: The First Jus-
John A., A step above anecdote: a profile of the Justice System, reviewed by Steven W. Hays, tice Harlan, by Tinsley E. Yarbrough, 94, 96.
civil jury in the 1990s, 233-241. 96-97.
Saks, Michael J., The smaller the jury, the greater Yarbrough, Tinsley E., Judicial Enigma: The First
the unpredictability, 263-265. Justice Harlan, reviewed by Stuart H. Shiffman,
Schwartz, Bernard, Justice Brennan and the 94, 96.
Brandenburg decision—a lawgiver in action, 24- The editors would like to thank
29. BOOK TITLES
Scruggs, Anna M., Mazzola, Jean-Claude, and A Civil Action, by Jonathan Harr, reviewed by
Zaug, Mary E., Recent Voting Rights Act chal- Stephen B. Burbank, 318, 320-321. the many individuals who
lenges to judicial elections, 34-41. Civil Juries and the Politics of Reform, by Stephen
Sherman, Gary, A simplified system of citation, 60, Daniels and Joanne Martin, reviewed by David
62-63; A response to “Keep government out of Partlett, 288. reviewed manuscripts
the citation business,” 64. Commonsense Justice: Jurors’ Notions of the Law,
Smith, Christopher E., Baugh, Joyce A., and by Norman J. Finkel, reviewed by Marsha B. Liss,
Hensley, Thomas R., The first-term performance 287-288. submitted for publication
of Justice Stephen Breyer, 74-79. Court Reform and Judicial Leadership: Judge
Smith, Christopher E. and Ochoa, Roxanne, The George Nicola and the New Jersey Justice Sys-
peremptory challenge in the eyes of the trial tem, by Paul B. Wice, reviewed by Steven W. during the past year.
judge, 185-189. Hays, 96-97.
Stech, Diana and Goldstein, Leslie Friedman, Ex- Fair is Fair: World Folktales of Justice, by Sharon
plaining transformations in Supreme Court policy, Creeden, reviewed by Jona Goldschmidt, 45-46.
80-85. Judicial Enigma: The First Justice Harlan, by
Tobias, Cari, Congress considers bill to split Ninth Tinsley E. Yarbrough, reviewed by Stuart H.
Circuit (focus), 198-199. Shiffman, 94, 96.
Vicenti, Carey N., The reemergence of tribal society The Jury: Trial and Error in the American Court-
and traditional justice systems, 134-141. room, by Steven Adler, reviewed by Albert W.
Vidmar, Neil, Pretrial prejudice in Canada: a com- Alschuler, 200-204.
parative perspective on the criminal jury, 249- Reconstructing Justice: An Agenda for Trial Re-
255. form, by Franklin Strier, reviewed by Samuel H.
Wallace, J. Clifford, A new era of federal-tribal court Pillsbury, 322-324.
cooperation, 150-153. Saving the Constitution from the Courts, by William
Wheeler, Russell, Warren Burger: a man of ‘com- Gangi, reviewed by Jeremy Rabkin, 325, 330.
mon sense and practical ideas’, 8-9.
Withey, David L. and Feldman, Stanley G., Resolv-
ing state-tribal jurisdictional dilemmas, 154-156. KEY
Zaug, Mary E., Scruggs, Anna M., and Mazzola, The pages used in the index listings
Jean-Claude, Recent Voting Rights Act chal- refer to the following months.
lenges to judicial elections, 34-41.
Pages Month
Zemans, Frances Kahn, Public access: The ulti-
mate guardian of fairness in our justice system, 1-52 July-August 1995
173-175. 53-104 September-October
105-164 November-December
165-208 January-February 1996
209-292 March-April
293-336 May-June
334 Judicature Volume 79, Number 6 May-June 1996