Table Of Content

446 Contents Volume 35 Vol. 35, No. 1 Long-range transport of ammonia released in a major chemical accident at Ionava, Lithuania J. Kukkonen, A.L. Savolainen, I. Valkama, S. Juntto and ee I IS Fall oon Ci nkankesbddrrtearsee edesbsnacsgseave'enres 1 Coal agloflotation and supercritical wet oxidation: Novel remediation techniques for ultra-cleaning of contaminated soils M.P. Kasi, F.O. Azzam and S. Lee (Akron, OH, USA).......cc.c .ce.ce. c.ec.e e.ee ee 17 A three-dimensional air flow model for soil venting: Superposition of analytical functions ee ED I, Ss OEE S40D ies cee ecid eeh csc rtesscccespicsctesscrwcccesch@dveremabies 31 Solidification/stabilization of a synthetic electroplating sludge in cementitious binders containing NaOH A. Roy, H.C. Eaton, F.K. Cartledge and M.E. Tittlebaum EEN SR eS er ee rrr Pe tE Aden ened nered.yy 53 Stabilization of mercury containing sludge by a combined process of two-stage pretreatment and solidification C.-Y. Chang, C.P. Hsu, J.S. Jann, Y.W. Chen, Y.C. Shih, C.F. Mao, W.Y. Lin, K.L. Yin and Y.M. Wu (Taiwan, Republic of China)...........0.. cc.c. ce.ce. e.e.ns 73 Soil remediation by agglomeration with Blue Creek coal M.B. Rahnama and D.W. Arnold (Tuscaloosa, AL, USA)...........0c.. c.e.e. e.en s 89 Dust explosion research. State-of-the-art and outstanding problems R.A. Eckhoff (Fantoft-Bergen, Norway) ..........0.cccccccccsccccccccccccscccccecees 103 Review Pollution prevention technologies: A review and classification DEP. TRIOS CORRE TAGIOG; Dia ATMA) ooo ccc cece ceececcceccevcccsccccbevsestos 119 I 25 su dias 4 dda on.6 00 kt URE OEINS 4446006044 00d ov hns 6008 0s 6 dabeksng abet «RAs 151 EE VASES ERO CES rt crn Sane k CO ey eee ne ee ne eT rr rrr 162 Vol. 35, No.2 Special issue: Role of Environmental (Ecological) Assessment in the Management of Chemical Pollution a a a ee ee ees eae iii Endangered species: The eye of the storm De Nis sa Ven ceebbaenevnecbes sdednueneesueese e 163 447 EPA responsibilities for administering ecological regulations P.R. Jutro and T.B. Carter (Washington, DC, USA) ......0.... c.ece. ce.ce. e.ee e es 173 Biota and business — Opposing forces? D.D. Anderson (Richmond, VA, USA) ....0. c.cc c.ece c.ece .cece .eee e.ecee.eeee.eeeu es 183 Corporate environmentalism: Emerging responsibilities for public disclosure in the European Community M.L. Keene (Washington, DC, USA) .......... 0.0 cece cece eeeeeeeeeees 197 Environmental assessment: U.S. requirements in new drug applications PAs. VaR Sea, EE PCN ob RRS ATL RU EI UA 211 Requirements of the FDA for the environmental assessment of animal health products C.J. Haley, J.C. Matheson III and C.E. Eirkson III COE, HUEY MUTIUES 6.6 + 00 b:ai ne yinen 06000509050) 6004000005. c00esese PPh eres 217 Protecting cultural resources in managing chemical pollution J.L. Friedman and B.J. Little (Bethesda, MD, USA)................ccccceeeeeceuue s 229 Ecological risk assessment: A scientific perspective J.H. Gentile, M.A. Harwell, W.H. van der Schalie, S.B. Norton and D.J. Rodier Coane [Ties mma a os ak eee SLAC AY EDA AV AWW. LIISA 241 Using toxicity data to evaluate ecological effects at Superfund sites a I GI, Se ag AEE bs wow be sere dvsdresescvervesetoussTseIcOesNs 255 Stress to indicator species as assessment endpoints ee MEY CIID, TED, SEINE nc 0c ccevederdcnricnrcsccsesecascuacntabees 273 Environmental biomarkers as indicators of chemical exposure P.J. Kloepper-Sams and J.W. Owens (Cincinnati, OH, USA) ....................... 283 The role of ecological assessments in the evaluation of contaminated sites S. Lemont (Linthicum, MD, USA), W.D. Eaton and R.L. Wiley SN. Be ER oye walls bar swgerind «Fees i GRRE A FOR. CINE Fad. a 1b AG 295 Selection of field and laboratory studies for environmental assessment J.M. Stamm (North Chicago, IL, USA) and R.R. Velagaleti GA, SIE, CIE occ seth vesesereneeencees cbnerennewsasaescrectesssneeeemeees vii 313 Use of physical and chemical properties to assess environmental transport and fate L. Marple and L. Throop (Palo Alto, CA; UBA). 6.0.6 bocce ccc cree cee cecsucseeeess 331 PII is §.06 500 906-05 EAA FRAO AERA ATA Baas 337 Vol. 35, No. 3 Special issue: The Use of Risk Assessment at DOE Facilities A ie aeG A Pe ON oeOe IAS AP eA Pe Reig gM aaa Np Nala aby men ea gy AD MERI ili 448 Risk computation for environmental restoration activities J.G. Droppo, Jr., J.W. Buck, D.L. Strenge and B.L. Hoopes (Richland, WA, USA) Using the RESRAD computer code to evaluate human health risks from radionuclides and hazardous chemicals J.-J. Cheng and C. Yu (Argonne, II, USA) Necessity of uncertainty analyses in risk assessment L. Shevenell and F.O. Hoffman (Oak Ridge, TN, USA) Evaluation of remediation worker risk at radioactively contaminated waste sites C.C. Travis, P.A. Scofield and B.P. Blaylock (Oak Ridge, TN, USA) Impacts of the use of institutional controls on risk assessments for U.S. Department of Energy facilities R.K. White, A. Redfearn, R. Shaw and A.D. King (Oak Ridge, TN, USA) “Smart” pump and treat W.F. Isherwood, D. Rice, Jr., J. Ziagos (Livermore, CA, USA) and E. Nichols (Emeryville, CA, USA) High-priority Hanford Site radioactive waste storage tank safety issues: An overview H. Babad, R.J. Cash, J.L. Deichman and G.D. Johnson (Richland, WA, USA) 427